Final Intro To PPP in SA 21 09 07
Final Intro To PPP in SA 21 09 07
Final Intro To PPP in SA 21 09 07
ministers foreword
Since 1999, public private partnerships (PPPs) in South Africa have been regulated under the PFMA, providing a clear and transparent framework for government and its private sector partners to enter into mutually beneficial commercial transactions, for the public good. Over the past seven years, we have progressively increased the number of PPP transactions covering a wide range of sectors, including transport, office accommodation, healthcare, eco-tourism, social development and correctional services. By 2007, there were 20 PPP projects in active implementation with no fewer than six projects reaching financial close during 2006/07. The increased number of projects attests to the growing body of experience related to PPPs, both within government and across the private sector. There have been some key lessons over the years, and some of these are captured in this document. It has taken repeated interactions between government institutions and the private sector to better understand each others needs. Ultimately, the objective of good PPP projects is to achieve win-win outcomes. Such outcomes are best achieved when government institutions have a very clear idea of what type of infrastructure and services are required to meet the needs of the public in a given sector. By communicating these needs precisely to the market, private sector players can come together in consortia that offer the best mix of skills to devise creative solutions through cost-effective designs. Although PPPs are but one avenue for procuring capital projects, the process followed is characterised by diligent planning and transparent bidding features that should be encouraged for all procurement methods. Moreover, the pressing service delivery challenges across all spheres of government suggest that PPPs could play an even greater role in South Africa. This publication makes a strong case for stepping up the application of PPPs in those sectors that lend themselves to private sector participation through effective risk transfer. Trevor A. Manuel, MP
Minister of Finance October 2007
Contents
1. What are PPPs? 2. Why do we use PPPs? 3. PPPs and BEE 4. The PPP process 5. What makes a good PPP? 6. A snapshot of some South African PPPs
4 10 15 18 22
24
.A PPP is any medium to long-term relationship between the public and private sectors, involving the sharing of risks and rewards of multisector skills, expertise and finance to deliver desired policy outcomes. (Standard & Poor) PPPs are long-term partnerships to deliver assets and services underpinning public services and community outcomes. Optimal structuring links private sector profitability to sustained performance over the long term, yielding robust and attractive cash flows for investors in return for delivering better value for money for the taxpayer. (John Laing plc)
A PPP is defined in South African law as:
A contract between a government institution and private party, where: the private party performs an institutional function and/or uses state property in terms of output specifications substantial project risk (financial, technical, operational) is transferred to the private party the private party benefits through: unitary payments from government budgets and/or user fees.
Risk
The public sector does not always manage risk well. For example, if an institution is building infrastructure, construction may be completed late and budgets may be overspent. This is not in the public interest. A key characteristic of PPPs is the transfer of risk from the public sector to the private sector. If the private sector does not complete construction on time and within budget, it will not be paid by the procuring institution. This principle also applies to the provision of services. If the agreed upon services are not available or do not meet the agreed upon standards, the private party faces financial penalties. However, it is important to understand that the institution does not transfer all the risks to the private sector. Only those risks that the private party is best able to manage are transferred.
Affordability
One of the most important tests for a PPP is whether the procuring institution can afford it, given its available budgets. Sometimes, institutions have not budgeted adequately for their infrastructure and service delivery needs. Budgets may need to be reviewed once proper business cases have been prepared and evaluated.
Characteristics of PPPs
A PPP is a clearly defined project, where the procuring institution carefully defines its objectives. The contractual relationship spans a set length of time, which may range from 5 to 30 years.
The private party plays a key role at each stage of the project: funding, development, design, completion and implementation.
What are PPPs?
The funding structures of a PPP sometimes combine public and private funds. Payment arrangements in PPPs are based on outputs, related to the provision of services and/or infrastructure and services. PPPs are not a way of avoiding payment for capital projects. They allow the procuring institution to spread payments for large projects over the projects lifetime. Direct user charges, like road tolls or water fees, may also contribute to a projects revenue. Risks are allocated to the party most able to carry them. This means mitigating their impact and/or being able to absorb the consequences. Fixed and operational assets are adequately maintained over the projects lifetime.
A PPP is not:
The way that a PPP is defined in Treasury Regulation 16 makes it clear that: A PPP is not a simple outsourcing of functions - it is a long-term contract involving substantial risk transfer A PPP is not a donation by a private party for a public good. A PPP is not the privatisation of state assets and/or liabilities.
The legislation
The main legislation governing PPPs at the national and provincial levels of government is the Public Finance Management Act (1999) (PFMA) and Treasury Regulation 16. Municipal PPPs are governed under the Municipal Finance Management Act (2003) (MFMA) and its regulations, and the Municipal Systems Act (2003) (MSA). All this legislation supports and reflects governments policy objectives for delivering infrastructure and public services, in line with its constitutional mandate. As a means of procuring and delivering infrastructure services, PPPs are in line with the intent of both the PFMA and MFMA. Both acts focus on delivering outputs through value-for-money solutions.
Types of PPPs
Treasury Regulation 16 defines two types of PPPs: where the private party performs an institutional function where the private party acquires the use of state property for its own commercial purposes.
A PPP may also be a hybrid of these types. Payment in any scenario involves one of three mechanisms: the institution paying the private party for the delivery of the services, or the private party collecting fees or charges from users of the service, or a combination of these.
Treasury Regulation 16 also allows PPPs to be developed with a range of different characteristics. These all involve transferring risk to the private party for designing, financing, building, and operating infrastructure and services. There are PPPs in many sectors of the South African economy, including health, transport, IT, head office accommodation, tourism, toll roads, fleet management, and education. It is appropriate that PPPs are developed in the sectors where more people require service delivery. (Section 6 of this booklet looks at some examples of the different types of PPP projects in South Africa.)
Financing PPPs
Treasury Regulation 16 is not prescriptive about the financing structure of a PPP . It is assumed that this will vary widely from project to project and sector to sector, and will be closely linked to the funding sources that can be secured for each deal. However, PPPs usually involve the private party raising both debt and equity to finance the project. In most PPPs, a dedicated business entity is set up by the private party. This is called the special purpose vehicle (SPV), whose sole purpose is to deliver the project. The typical structure of an SPV is shown in the diagram below, together with the financing structure. National Treasurys PPP Manual and Standardised PPP Provisions have been developed for this typical PPP structure and provide the mechanism for soliciting sources of funding. PPPs may involve some capital contribution by the institution to the initial costs of the project. Some PPP projects do not involve debt finance at all, being initially funded either wholly through corporate finance or by a combination of government funds and private equity. In end-user-pay projects, there may also be some government funding for either or both the capital and operating costs of the project.
What are PPPs?
Government
PPP agreement
Equity
Shareholding
Loan agreement
Debt
Subcontracts
10
ensure that there is a strong financial incentive to complete construction on time and within budget, as the private party will be keen to start servicing its debt. PPPs leverage private sector skills In handing over certain responsibilities for a project, the procuring institution is using a range of skills offered by the private party. These include all the skills required in the development or upgrading of infrastructure, project management skills, contract management skills, and, if a service is being procured, particular service skills. Because of the acute skills shortage in South Africa, this is a particularly important criterion for choosing a PPP . The procuring institution needs to reflect honestly on its own track record of project delivery. Has it been able to deliver services on time and in budget? Does it have the necessary project management skills? If the institution is procuring a project requiring specialist skills, the private party which has these skills could supplement the institutions existing in-house skills. Where the institution does not yet have the skills, the PPP can contribute to skills transfer and capacity building. Part of the PPP contract should also involve the private party transferring appropriate skills to the procuring institution. PPPs can be good for project planning The PPP regulations require managers to go through a careful planning process centered around the project feasibility study. So PPPs are a good way for government institutions to plan projects, aligning them with their strategic delivery responsibilities using well developed business plans. The private sector takes financial risk over the lifecycle of the project Sometimes the private partys pricing structures in a PPP may seem more expensive than traditional procurement. A reason for this is that in calculating and designing its pricing, the private party is including the cost of the risks that it will be managing for the entire duration of the project. In some traditional procurement, not all the risks and their associated cost are reflected in a contractor/service providers upfront pricing. Rather, the procuring institution will be responsible for any unforeseen delays or hindrances and for any failure on its part to deliver the anticipated services, and it will be penalised accordingly. Risks are allocated to the party best able to manage a particular risk PPPs are designed so that risks are allocated to the party best able to manage them. For example, if the private party has the right skills to manage a project over the long term and the procuring institution does not, it makes sense for the private party to take on the risks associated with project delivery.
11
PPPs deliver budgetary certainty When the PPP agreement is signed, the future cost of a PPP project is clear: the procuring institution will receive specific outputs at specific costs and will budget accordingly. In traditional procurement on the other hand, the costs of completing the project and maintaining the assets in the future are not certain, and are the responsibility of the procuring institution. Also, many institutions do not budget appropriately for the maintenance and operating costs of their assets. The public sector pays only when services are delivered In a PPP , the procuring institution pays only when the private party starts to deliver the services. For example, if the private party is late, the institution does not pay, which means that the taxpayer does not carry the cost for a service that is not happening. The method of payment is carefully linked to the quality of services being provided. If services are not being delivered to the institutions satisfaction and in line with the PPP agreement, the private party may also be liable to pay penalties. So it is in the private partys interest to deliver quality services on time, which in turn benefits the end-user. PPPs force the public sector to focus on outputs and benefits from the start When the procuring institution is working out what it needs to deliver and is considering a PPP as a possible vehicle, it has to specify the outputs of a service, and not concentrate so much on how the service is going to be delivered. The institution therefore focuses on service levels and the successful private party bidder is responsible for designing the details of the project. The quality of service has to be maintained for the duration of the PPP The private party has to maintain the same standard of service delivery for the duration of the contract. This can contrast strongly with traditional procurement, when the condition of an asset declines as the asset gets older and so the service levels decline over time. Specialist skills are developed and transferred to the public sector In a competitive environment, it is in the interests of the private sector to proactively develop skills that will benefit the project and the procuring institution. The PPP contract will specifically require skills to be transferred to the public sector. PPPs encourage the injection of private sector capital The use of borrowed private sector capital for a project means that the lenders of the capital will apply rigorous measures to make sure that a project is viable and stays on track. These include a due diligence, and rigorous monitoring
12
and control mechanisms throughout the project. In addition, returns on debt and equity are only secured if a project is successfully completed and operating properly. This provides an incentive to the private party to implement and manage the project well.
Before deciding whether to pursue a PPP , the procuring institution needs to carefully reflect on a number of important issues related to the tests of risk, affordability and value for money.
13
14
The PPP BEE Code of Good Practice is gazetted under the Broad-based Black Economic Employment Act, together with other industry charters.
15
BEE in an SPV
Institution
PPP agreement
Equity
Shares
Loans
Debt
Black equity
Subcontracts
Every aspect of BEE is carefully considered within the PPP ownership and management structure. For example, to achieve meaningful equity participation in the SPV, it is important that both the percentage of ownership of black partners and the specific strategic role they will play in implementing the project are monitored . In addition, the PPP process is structured to reduce the costs associated with black partners borrowing to purchase equity in the SPV and to shorten the time it takes for them to receive dividends from the project. All other aspects of BEE are continuously evaluated. These include the number of black managers and black female managers, as well as employment equity plans, and skills development programmes for developing black staff. The amount spent on black owned SMME subcontractors is also monitored, to ensure that they benefit from the implementation of the PPP . Features of BEE within the SPV: The private party SPV is a long-term business, making it possible to grow black equity and management over time. There is broad-based BEE impact: PPPs reach big and small entrepreneurs.
16
Risk is clearly identified and costed: Financial institutions will be more likely to lend funds to the SPV. Cash flows are secure where government is the buyer of the service, providing business certainty to BEE equity partners. PPPs create jobs and develop skills for BEE partners. PPPs create significant subcontracting opportunities for black SMMEs. PPPs have created a strong demand for black professionals as transaction advisors to both institutions and private parties.
17
18
Inception
Feasibility study
Procurement
Implementation
Inception:
The procuring institution registers the project with National Treasurys PPP Unit.
Feasibility study: The procuring institution appoints private sector advisors to do a feasibility study on the most appropriate mechanism for procuring the project. Procurement: If the feasibility study shows that a PPP is a viable option, the procuring institution invites the market to submit bids for the infrastructure and/or service provision project.
Implementation: The project is implemented once a suitable bidder has been chosen.
19
20
provides quarterly PPP training for both the public and private sectors produces and distributes the PPP Quarterly and is the PPP knowledge management centre for the country is in touch with international PPP bodies to ensure that South African PPPs keep up with international best practice works with provincial treasuries to oversee provincial PPPs.
21
22
The processes for procuring lower value PPPs are adapted and streamlined so that they can be implemented faster3. The PPP Unit proactively promotes and facilitates PPPs. The public sector has clear and articulate policy goals. There are clear rules for comparing PPP procurement and traditional public procurement. The private sector is incentivised to transfer skills.
It is imperative that the public and private sectors move towards a greater shared vision of the role that PPPs can play in delivering infrastructure and services in South Africa. The onus is on both parties to make PPPs viable through a genuine spirit of co-operation that engenders trust.
National Treasurys PPP Toolkit for Tourism distinguishes between large cap and small cap PPPs, which is reflected in the project cycle. Small cap PPPs are particularly appropriate to the tourism sector, where many projects are carried out by SMMEs. The small cap route is a streamlined and thus quicker process.
23
Projects in operation
Inkosi Albert Luthuli Hospital This is one of the few paperless hospitals in the world. The private party is responsible for the provision and regular upgrading of state-of-the art medical equipment, facility management and an IT system. The integrated IT system allows for the diagnosis and treatment of patients from anywhere in the hospital: all patient information is available electronically to all medical staff at any time. Free State social grants This project allows pensions and other social grants to be provided to the rural poor using state of the art wireless technologies. The distribution method, which uses the electronic fingerprint recognition system, has created greater efficiencies and resulted in a massive reduction in fraud. Emergency healthcare is also provided to elderly pensioners waiting in a queue. IT for the Department of Labour This PPP provides complete IT services and up-to-date, state-of-the-art equipment to the Department of Labour, including LANs, WANs and industryspecific labour software. The project has enabled the department to set up a website for registering domestic workers for social services such as pensions and unemployment benefits. The DTI Campus This project, which provides new head office accommodation for the Department of Trade and Industry and all its entities, was the first PPP head office project.
24
The building incorporates innovative designs for using space and light and the IT system is fully integrated across the campus. The operation and management of all aspects of the infrastructure is outsourced to the private party. SanPark concessions The SanPark concessions for tourism have been particularly important for establishing new SMMEs, which in turn created significant and sustainable job opportunities in the tourism sector. The experience of the SanPark concessions is captured in the first sector-specific PPP toolkit (for tourism).
Financial closure means that all the financial aspects of the deal have been agreed, the financing documents have been signed and project implementation can proceed.
A snapshot
25
A snapshot
agreement is that the provincial health department knows upfront the financial implications of the potential vacancy rates at the facilities, which is conducive to improved value for money. Another feature is that the BEE targets include sourcing a certain percentage of the labour from the local Mitchells Plain communities. The project became operational in March 2007. Commercial closure5: November 2006 Polokwane Hospital renal dialysis service This is the first health PPP in South Africa in which the private party provides 100 per cent of the clinical services. The private party delivers all services related to renal dialysis, including the provision of specialists and pathologists. Having taken over the function from the provincial health department, the private party is phasing in the service. Before this project, patients had to go to GaranKuwa for renal dialysis. Now they have access to medical care at standards that have been benchmarked with the private sector. This PPP could be used as a model for other projects. Financial closure: November 2006 Port Alfred and Settlers hospital In this co-location project6 in Eastern Cape, the private party provides infrastructure and facilities management. The arrangement also has the private sector providing some clinical services to the public sector, and public sector staff providing some clinical services in the private facilities. There are a number of retired medical professionals in Grahamstown, where the Settlers Hospital is located, and under the private party they are able to provide some specialist care at the hospital. Financial closure: May 2007
Commercial closure means that the legal contracts and commercial structure of the PPP have been finalised. Commercial closure comes before financial closure. In a co-location hospital project, the hospital has separate facilities for public patients and for private patients, but also has some shared services. The private party is responsible for running the entire hospital and for ensuring high quality services to all patients.
26
A snapshot
27
A snapshot
30