MultiCraft

International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology Vol. 1, No. 1, 2009, pp. 245-253

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY www.ijest-ng.com 2009 MultiCraft Limited. All rights reserved

Effects of superficial gas velocity and fluid property on the hydrodynamic performance of an airlift column with alcohol solution
V. Sivasubramaniana* and B.S. Naveen Prasadb
a

Department of Chemical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Calicut, Kerala 673601, India b Department of Chemical Engineering, Sathyabama University, Chennai, India E-mail: ([email protected] (V. Sivasubramanian), *Corresponding author), Tel: 0495-2286525, 2286544

Abstract In the present study, the influence of superficial gas velocity and fluid properties on gas holdup and liquid circulation velocity in a three-phase external loop airlift column using polystyrene (0.0036 m diameter and 1025.55 kg/m3 density) and nylon-6 (0.0035 m diameter and 1084.24 kg/m3 density) particles with aqueous solutions of alcohols (isoamyl alcohol and propanol) as liquids were investigated. The column was constructed using acrylic tube of inner diameter 0.084m and 2.6m in height. The gas holdup in the riser increased with increase in superficial gas velocity for air-alcohol-solid system. The presence of alcohol surfactants increased the gas holdup in the riser. It was also found that an increase in the superficial gas velocity increased the liquid circulation velocity for air-alcohol-solid system. Correlations were proposed for the prediction of gas holdup and liquid circulation velocity. Keywords: External loop airlift bioreactor, three-phase, effect of additives, hydrodynamics 1. Introduction Airlift reactors have several advantages: simple design concept, high mixing performance, high mass transfer ability, good heat transfer and low energy consumption. Airlift loop reactors find extensive applications in many areas of chemical engineering, especially for homogeneous as well as heterogeneous single and multiphase systems due to their simple construction and operation, directed circulation flow, good mixing and favorable ratio of interfacial area to energy dissipation rate per unit volume, low investment, operational costs and relatively lower power requirements (Merchuk and Siegel, 1988). Based on their configurations, airlift reactors can be classified into two groups: internal-loop and external-loop airlift reactors. An internal-loop airlift reactor contains a vertical baffle or a draft tube by which a loop channel for fluid circulation is formed in the reactor. An external-loop airlift reactor consists of two vertical tubes (a riser and a downcomer) which are connected by horizontal connections at the top and bottom. A distractive difference between the two groups is the presence of the horizontal connections (Choi, 2001). Herskowitz and Merchuk (1986) reported the influence of solid particles on the gas hold and liquid superficial velocity in a novel three phase fluidized bed reactor. Posarac and Petrovic (1988) found that the minimum fluidization velocity of 3-6 mm glass spheres was found to increase with solids loading. Kochbeck et al. (1992) reported the hydrodynamics and local parameters in three-phase-flow in airlift-loop reactors of different scale. Douek et al. (1994) observed that gas holdup and the liquid circulation velocity in the riser increased with increase in gas superficial velocity. A new method for the measurement of solids holdup in gasliquid-solid three-phase systems was proposed by Wenge et al. (1995). Guo et al. (1997) reported the influence of hydrodynamics and mass transfer studies in a novel external-loop airlift reactor. Freitas et al. (1997) proposed a new sampling device for measuring solids holdup in a three-phase system. Freitas and Teixeira (1998) reported on solid-phase distribution in an airlift reactor with an enlarged degassing zone. Freitas et al. (2000) reported the influence of the diameter of the distributor orifice, superficial gas velocity, solid loading and solid density on the hydrodynamics of a three-phase external-loop airlift bioreactor. The development and use of simple method for regime identification and flow characterization in bubble columns and airlift reactors was reported by Vial et al. (2001). Shimizu et al. (2001) developed the phenomenological simulation model for prediction of gas hold-up and volumetric mass

246

Sivasubramanian and Prasad / International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2009, pp. 245-253

transfer coefficients in external-loop airlift reactors. Meng et al. (2002) reported the use of a modified volume expansion (inclined tube) method for determination of overall gas holdup in an external loop airlift bubble column. Wang et al. (2003) reported the determination of gas holdup, liquid circulating velocity and mass transfer coefficient in a mini-scale external- loop airlift bubble column. Blazej et al. (2004) reported the simulation of gas-liquid flow in an airlift reactor using commercially available software Fluent. From the literature, it is observed that most of the studies used pure water as liquid while all applications in wastewater treatment or biochemical reactors use complex aqueous solutions. Studies conducted with regular fluidized beds have shown that the presence of minor liquid impurities can greatly affect the bed hydrodynamics (Saberian-Broujenni et al., 1984; Nacef et al., 1988; Song et al., 1989; Prakash, 1991; Del Pozo et al., 1994). However, little attention has been focused on the effect of additives in the hydrodynamic performance studies in external loop airlift bioreactors. The main objective of the present study is to establish whether changes in liquid coalescing properties caused by minute concentrations of additives can greatly affect the hydrodynamic properties of a three-phase external loop airlift column and to investigate the influence of superficial gas velocity and fluid properties on gas holdup and liquid circulation velocity. 2. Material and methods The schematic diagram of the external loop airlift column used in the present investigation is shown (Figure 1). The column was constructed using acrylic tube of inner diameter 0.084 m and 2.6 m in height. The column consisted of four sections namely riser, downcomer, base and gas-liquid separator. The riser and downcomer were connected with an inclined angle 45o at the top and the bottom section of the column. In order to avoid solids settling, the connection pipes between the riser and downcomer were inclined. The external loop airlift column had a perforated plate gas sparger with 243 holes of 1mm diameter on a triangular pitch placed at the base of the column. Air from the compressor was sparged to the column through an air filter, pressure regulator and calibrated rotameter. Provision was made to insert the dissolved oxygen meter probe above the gas sparger. All runs were made at room temperature (252C). The solid particles used are polystyrene of 0.0036m diameter (1025.55 kg/m3 density) and nylon-6 of 0.0035m diameter (1084.24 kg/m3 density). The physical properties of aqueous solutions of alcohols were given in Table 1. The gas holdup in the riser in three-phase system was determined by manometric technique and the liquid circulation velocity in the downcomer of the column was determined by tracer technique using 10 mm polystyrene spherical particle of density of 1012 kg/m3. Table 1. Physical properties of aqueous solutions of isoamyl alcohol and propanol Density, Surface tension, Viscosity, Additive Concentrations l (mPa.s) l (kg/m3) l (N/m) Isoamyl alcohol 20 mg/l 998 1.0 0.072 Isoamyl alcohol 40 mg/l 998 1.0 0.071 Isoamyl alcohol 60 mg/l 998 0.98 0.069 Isoamyl alcohol 80 mg/l 998 0.97 0.069 Isoamyl alcohol 100 mg/l 997 0.97 0.067 Propanol 0.1 wt % 998 1.0 0.072 Propanol 0.2 wt % 998 1.0 0.072 Propanol 0.3 wt % 998 0.98 0.070 Propanol 0.4 wt % 998 0.97 0.069 Propanol 0.5 wt % 998 0.97 0.068 2.1 Measurement of gas holdup in three-phase system In the three-phase systems, two different types of solid particles Polystyrene and Nylon-6 at various solids loading were used and the solid loadings were varied from 1000-3000 ml (4.25-12.765% (Vol.)). The gas holdup in the riser in three-phase system was determined by manometric technique and are related to solid holdup, s by

( l ) s + ( l h / z ) gr = s ( ) + ( ) l s l g s

(1)

247

Sivasubramanian and Prasad / International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2009, pp. 245-253

10

1. Compressor 2. AirFilter 3. Pressure Regulator 4. Rotameter 5. Calm Section 6. Sparger 7. Manometer Tappings 8. Downcomer 9. Gas-liquid Separator 10. Riser 11. DO Probe

11

7 4

1 2

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of external loop airlift column

248

Sivasubramanian and Prasad / International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2009, pp. 245-253

s =

h ( s l ) z

(2)

2.2 Measurement of liquid circulation velocity The liquid circulation velocity in the downcomer of the column was determined by tracer technique using 10 mm polystyrene spherical particle of density of 1012 kg/m3. The time required for the particle to travel between two ports on the wall of the downcomer was observed to calculate the liquid circulation velocity in the downcomer (Uld). Thirty measurements were taken for each calculation of liquid velocity in the downcomer. The measurement of tracer particle traveling close to the column wall was excluded from the data (Bello et al., 1984; Kawase, 1990; Kemblowski et al., 1993; Wang et al., 2003). The liquid circulation velocity in the riser and downcomer were obtained by

U ld = x c / t c U lr Ar = U ld Ad U lr = U ld ( Ar / Ad )
3. Results and discussion

(3) (4) (5)

3.1 Variation of gas holdup in the riser with superficial gas velocity for air-alcohol-solid systems The variation of gas holdup in the riser, gr with superficial gas velocity for air-alcohol-solid systems is shown in Figure 2. The experiments were carried out with an optimized solids loading of 2000 ml. It was observed that the gr increased linearly with increase in superficial gas velocity. The presence of alcohol surfactants increased the gr. This was mainly due to the suppression of bubble coalescence i.e. number of small bubbles produced in the riser had an insufficient bubble rise velocity to escape from the liquid. A similar trend was observed by Koide et al. (1985), Nicol and Davidson (1988) and Al-Masry and Dukkan (1997). 3.2 Effect of alcohol concentrations on gr The effects of propanol and isoamyl alcohol concentrations on gr are shown in Figures 3. The addition of propanol and isoamyl alcohol was found to increase the gr. The bubble diameter and bubble rise-velocity were the functional parameters, which govern the riser gas holdup for alcohol surfactants. The increase in concentration of surfactants decreased the bubble diameter and rise velocity, which increased the gr. This may be due to the decrease in the surface tension of the liquid phase. 3.3 Variation of liquid circulation velocity in the riser with superficial gas velocity for air-alcohol-solid systems The variation of liquid circulation velocity, Ulr with superficial gas velocity for three-phase systems is shown in Figure 4. It was found that an increase in the superficial gas velocity increased the Ulr. The addition of alcohol surfactants decreased the Ulr. It was also observed that the concentrations of alcohol surfactants did not have any marginal effects on the Ulr, which was obtained by Al-Masry and Dukkan. 3.4 Effect of alcohol concentrations on Ulr The effect of propanol and isoamyl alcohol concentrations on Ulr is shown in Figures 5 for 2000 ml solids loading. It was observed that the addition of solids and an increase in alcohol concentration decreased the Ulr. The alcohol surfactants did not have any marginal effects on the Ulr. A same trend was reported by Al-Masry and Dukkan.

249

Sivasubramanian and Prasad / International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2009, pp. 245-253

Figure 2. Variation of gas holdup in the riser with superficial gas velocity for (a) Air-propanol-polystyrene system; (b) Airpropanol-nylon-6-system; (c) Air-IAA-polystyrene system; (d) Air-IAA-nylon-6 system

250

Sivasubramanian and Prasad / International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2009, pp. 245-253

Figure 3. Effect of alcohol concentrations on gr for (a) Air-propanol-polystyrene system; (b) Air-propanol-nylon-6-system; (c) Air-IAA-polystyrene system; (d) Air-IAA-nylon-6 system

251

Sivasubramanian and Prasad / International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2009, pp. 245-253

Figure 4. Variation of liquid circulation velocity in the riser with superficial gas velocity for air-propanol-polystyrene system

a b Figure 5. Effect of alcohol concentration on liquid circulation velocity in the riser for (a) air-propanol-polystyrene system; (b) air-IAA-polystyrene system 3.5 Correlation for gas holdup in the riser and liquid circulation velocity for air-alcohol-solids system The value of gas holdup in the riser and liquid circulation velocity in the riser for three-phase system have been correlated as

gr = 18.577U sgr
0 Usgr 0.033

( 0.984 +1.1610 4 C s )

0.05 l 0.038 l 0.996

R2 = 0.93 R2 = 1

(6) (7)

U ld = U lr = 2.727U sgr

( 0.384 + 6.5210 C s )

0.0096 l 0.0034 l 0.997

Parity plots between experimental and predicted values of gr and Ulr based on the proposed empirical equations 6 and 7 for airalcohol-solids system are shown in Figures 6a and b respectively. The average RMS error for gr and Ulr are 11.6 and 3.8% respectively. It was found that the proposed equations fitted the experimental data well within 30 and 14% respectively.

252

Sivasubramanian and Prasad / International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2009, pp. 245-253

a b Figure 6. Parity diagram of predicted and experimental values for (a)gr estimated from empirical Eqn 6 for air-alcohol-solid system; (b) Ulr estimated from empirical Eqn 7 for air-alcohol-solid system. 4. Conclusions The gas holdup in riser, gr increased linearly with increase in superficial gas velocity. The addition of propanol and isoamyl alcohol was found to increase the gr. An increase in the superficial gas velocity increased the liquid circulation velocity in the riser, Ulr. It was observed that the addition of solids and an increase in alcohol concentration decreased the Ulr. The proposed correlations for gas holdup in the riser and liquid circulation velocity predicted the experimental data well for air-alcohol (propanol and isoamyl alcohol)-solid system.

Nomenclature Ad downcomer cross sectional area, m2 Ar riser cross sectional area, m2 Cs solids loading, w/v d diameter, m tc time taken between two peaks, s Usgr superficial gas velocity in the riser, m/s Ulr ,Uld liquid circulation velocity in the riser and the downcomer, m/s xc distance between the two adjacent peaks, m IAA iso amyl alcohol z distance between two ports, m h manometric reading, m Greek symbols g gas holdup volume fraction of solids in liquid - solid two-phase slurry surface tension, mN/m viscosity, mPas density, kg/m3 Subscripts d downcomer g gas l liquid r riser s solid

253

Sivasubramanian and Prasad / International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2009, pp. 245-253

References Al-Masry W.A., and Dukkan A.R. 1997. Chem. Eng. J., Vol. 65, pp. 263-271. Bello R.A., Robinson C.W. and Moo-Young M. 1984, Can. J. Chem. Eng., Vol. 62, pp. 573-577. Blazej M., Cartland Glover G.M., Generalis S.C. and Markeos J. 2004. Chem. Eng. Proc., Vol. 43, pp. 137-144. Choi K.H. 2001. Korean J. Chem. Eng., Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 240-246. Del Pozo M., Briens C.L. and Wild G. 1994. Chem. Eng. J., Vol. 55, pp. 1-14. Douek R.S., Livingston A.G., Johansson A.C., and Hewitt G.F. 1994. Chem. Eng. Sci., Vol. 49, No. 22, pp. 3719-3737. Freitas C., and Teixeira J.A. .1998. Biotechnol. Techn., Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 219-224. Freitas C., Fialova M., Zahradnik J., and Teixeira J.A. .2000. Chem. Eng. Sci., Vol. 55, pp. 4961-4972. Guo Y.X., Rathor M.N., and Ti H.C. .1997. Chem. Eng. J., Vol. 67, pp. 205-214. Herskowitz M., and Merchuk, C.J. .1986. Can. J. Chem. Eng., Vol. 64, pp. 57-61. Kawase Y. 1990. Biotechnol. Bioeng., Vol. 35, pp. 540-546. Kemblowski Z., Przywarski J. and Diab A. 1993. Chem. Eng. Sci., Vol. 48, No. 23, pp. 4023-4035. Kochbeck B., Lindert M., and Hempel D.C. 1992. Chem. Eng. Sci., Vol. 47, No. 13/14, pp. 3443-3450. Koide K., Horibe K., Kawabata H., and Ito S. 1985. J. Chem. Eng. Japan, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 248-254. Meng A.X., Hill G.A. and Dalai A.K. 2002. Can. J. Chem. Eng., Vol. 80, pp. 194-199. Merchuk J. C. and Siegel, H. 1988. Chem. Teeh. Biotechnol., Vol. 41, p. 105. Nacef S., Wild G., Laurent A. and Kim S.D. 1988. Entropie, Vol. 143-144, pp. 83-101. Nicol R.S., and Davidson J.F. 1988. Chem. Eng. Res. Dev., Vol. 66, pp. 159-164. Posarac D., and Petrovic D. 1988. Chem. Eng. Sci., Vol. 43, No. 5, pp. 1161-1165. Prakash A. 1991. Enhancement of gas-liquid and particle-liquid mass transfer in bubble columns and three-phase fluidized beds. Ph.D. Thesis. The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada. Saberian-Broujenni M., Wild G., Charpentier, J.C., Fortin, Y., Enzen, J.P. and Patoux, R., 1984. Entropie, Vol. 120, pp. 30-44. Shimizu K., Takada S., Takahadhi T. and Kawase Y. 2001. Chem. Eng. J., Vol. 84, pp. 599-603. Song, G.H., Bavarian, F. and Fan, L.S. 1989. Can. J. Chem. Eng., Vol. 67, pp. 256-275. Vial C., Poncin S., Wild G. and Midoux N. 2001. Chem. Eng. Proc., Vol. 40, pp. 130-151. Wang S., Arimatsu Y., Koumatsu K., Furumoto K., Yashimoto M., Fukunaga K. and Nakao K. 2003. Chem. Eng. Sci., Vol. 58, pp. 3353-3360. Wenge F.W., Chisti. M.Y., and Moo-Young M. 1995. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., Vol. 34, pp. 928-935.

Biographical notes Dr. V.Sivasubramanian is Associate Professor in Chemical Engineering at National Institute of Technology Calicut, India. His research has focused on Wastewater Treatment using Inverse Fluidized Bed Reactor and Treatment of Effluent using Biomembrane Techniques. He is the author of over 20 articles which have appeared in journals such as Asia-Pacific J Chem Eng., J Chem Technol Biotechnol., J Chem Eng Japan, IETECH J Mech Design, J Indian Chem Engr and Rubber India. He is also author of a book titled, Process Economics and Industrial Management. He is the recipient of the award and first prize for an oral presentation from Prof. M. M. Sharma in CHEMCON 2004, Mumbai, India. He is Editor in Intern J Eng., Sci Technol, Nigeria and Medwell Journals. He is also reviewer in Clean, Elsevier, USA, Asia-Pacific J Chem Eng, Wiley Interscience, Australia, Chem Product and Process Modeling, The Berkeley Electronic Press, USA, Chem Eng Sci, Adv Powder Technol, Elsevier, Desalination Journal, Elsevier, USA, Intern J Biotechnol., Inderscience Publishers, Intern J Chem Reactor Eng, The Berkeley Electronic Press, USA, Intern J Eng, Science and Technology, Nigeria and Indian J Sci and Technol. Mr. B.S. Naveen Prasad is Faculty in Chemical Engineering Department at Sathyabama University, Chennai, India. He did his graduation in Chemical Engineering at Kongu Engineering College, Erode. Bharathiar University, Coimbatore. He completed his M.S. (By Research) programme in the Department of Chemical Engineering, A. C. College of Technology, Anna University, Chennai. He registered for his Doctoral programme in Biotechnology Department at Sathyabama University, Chennai.