Project LOGMOS-Progress Report I October 2011 en
Project LOGMOS-Progress Report I October 2011 en
Progress Report l
October 2011
Page 1 of XX
Inception Report
Contractor
8, Lysenko Street, office 39, Kiev 01034, Ukraine Tel/Fax: +380 44 234 03 88, +380 44 288 08 92
Egis International Place des Frres Montgolfier 78286 Guyancourt Cedex France
Progress Report I
Page 1 of 68
Recipient list: Name PS IGC TRACECA AZ 1005, Address 8/2, Aliyarbekov Str., Baku, Azerbaijan AZ 370000 Tel. number Fax number E-mail Contact Person +99412 498 27 18 +99412 498 64 26 [email protected] Mr Eduard Biriucov
Name
Permanent Representative of PS IGC TRACECA in Armenia P.O. Box 69 28, Nalbandyan Str., Yerevan, 0010 Armenia +37410 59 00 88 +37410 52 38 62 [email protected] Mr Gagik Grigoryan
Address
Name
Permanent Representative of the IGC TRACECA in Azerbaijan 8/2, Aliyarbekov Str., Baku, AZ 1005 Azerbaijan
Address
Page 2 of 68
Progress Report I
Name
Address
Name
Permanent Representative of the PS IGC TRACECA in Georgia 12, G. Chanturia Str. Tbilisi, 0108 Georgia
Address
Name
Permanent Representative of the IGC TRACECA in Kazakhstan 32/1, Kabanbai batyr av., Astana, Kazakhstan
Address
Progress Report I
Page 3 of 68
Name
Representative of the PS IGC TRACECA in Kyrgyzstan 42, Isanova Str., 720017 Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
Address
Name
Representative of the PS IGC TRACECA in Moldova 162, Stefan cel Mare avenue
Address
Name
Permanent Representative of the IGC TRACECA in Tajikistan 80, Rudaki Str., Dushanbe, Tajikistan +992 372 21 09 70 [email protected] Mr Solih Muminov
Address
Page 4 of 68
Progress Report I
Name
Address
Name
Address
Name
Address
Progress Report I
Page 5 of 68
Name
Address
Name
Permanent Representative of the IGC TRACECA in Turkey Hakk Turayli Caddesi No:5
Address
Page 6 of 68
Progress Report I
27 October 2011 27 July 2011 27 October 2011 Egis International / Dornier Consulting GmbH
EU M & E team
EU Delegation in Azerbaijan ________________ __ [name] EU Delegation in Armenia ___________________ [name] EU Delegation in Georgia __________________ [name] EU Delegation in Kazakhstan __________________ [name] EU Delegation in Kyrgyzstan __________________ [name] EU Delegation in Moldova __________________ [name] __________ ____________ [signature] [date] __________ ____________ [signature] [date] __________ ____________ [signature] [date] __________ ____________ [signature] [date] __________ ____________ [signature] [date] __________ ____________ [signature] [date]
Progress Report I
Page 7 of 68
EU Delegation in Tajikistan Europa House in Turkmenistan EU Delegation in Turkey EU Delegation in Ukraine Europa House in Uzbekistan __________________ [name] __________ ____________ [signature] [date] __________________ [name] __________ ____________ [signature] [date] __________________ [name] __________ ____________ [signature] [date] __________________ [name] __________ ____________ [signature] [date] __________________ [name] __________ ____________ [signature] [date]
Page 8 of 68
Progress Report I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 2 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 10 PROJECT SYNOPSIS ........................................................................................................................... 11 ANALYSIS OF THE PROJECT ............................................................................................................. 14 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4 RELEVANT PROJECT CONTEXT .......................................................................................................... 14 IMPLEMENTATION APPROACH ............................................................................................................ 15 ADDITIONAL TASKS AND DEVIATIONS .................................................................................................. 15 COOPERATION WITH THE TRACECA, EU PROJECTS AND SECTORAL STAKEHOLDERS ......................... 17
PROJECT PLANNING .......................................................................................................................... 25 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 25 MAIN OUTPUT OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................. 25 REPORTING PERIOD III- APRIL 2012 OCTOBER 2012 ....................................................................... 28 REPORTING PERIOD IV- OCTOBER 2012 - APRIL 2013 ....................................................................... 30 REPORTING PERIOD V - APRIL 2013 OCTOBER 2013 ....................................................................... 31 FINAL REPORTING PERIOD OCTOBER 2013 - APRIL 2014 ................................................................ 31
5 6
PROJECT PROGRESS IN THE REPORTING PERIOD ...................................................................... 53 PROJECT PLANNING FOR NEXT SIX MONTH .................................................................................. 65
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Overall Plan of Operations ............................................................................................................... 33 Table 2: Overall Output Performance Plan .................................................................................................... 42 Table 3: Resource Utilisation Report ............................................................................................................. 49 Table 4: Plan of Operations for the Next Period (Work Programme) (1) ....................................................... 50
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Project Approach ............................................................................................................................ 15 Figure 2: LOGMOS Planning ......................................................................................................................... 25
Progress Report I
Page 9 of 68
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The project Logistics Processes and Motorways of the Sea II, launched by the European Commission in April 2011, is the successor of three projects: Motorways of the Black and Caspian Seas, International Logistics Centres for Western NIS and the Caucasus and Logistical Centres for Central Asia. As a result, five Pilot MoS projects for the Black and Caspian Seas and eleven pre-feasibility and feasibility studies of logistics centres in 10 TRACECA countries are on the LOGMOS TRACECA implementation agenda. The present report documents the activity of the LOGMOS technical assistance project during the first six months of its implementation. The report provides short information on the project, and elaborates on its start and initial implementation period. This paper documents the plans of the project team till the end of the project in the context of situation with local stakeholders and cooperation with project partners and target groups. This planning is presented from the point of view of performance indicator delivery and lists the identified missions and events. The report points out the additional tasks and deviations which were identified for inclusion into the mandate of the project since its start. The current paper delivers an overview on the country based activities aimed at the results of each particular component. The document provides an outline of planning activities for the next reporting period. This administrative report is accompanied with a number of technical annexes including: Annex 1 Logframe Annex 2 List of Meetings in August 2011 October 2011 Annex 3 TRACECA Inland Waterways Dnepr Case Study Annex 4 Documents of the Baku Task Force Meeting Annex 5 Documents of the Ukrainian Working Group Meeting Annex 6 Documents of the LOGMOS Regional Meeting in Tbilisi Appendix A: Short Introduction to the Country Profiles The report explains the overall objective of the current project contributing to the long term sustainable development of logistics infrastructure and multimodal transport along the TRACECA corridor. The paper explains project approach enhancing development and implementation of coherent strategies for establishment of intermodal integrated transport and logistics chains underpinned by MoS are in focus of the present assignment. The report points out the project will be implemented in the interactive manner, pursuing the regional dialogue, international partnerships and facilitating to ownerships of the beneficiaries and stakeholders over identified pilot initiatives.
Page 10 of 68
Progress Report I
PROJECT SYNOPSIS
Project Name: ENPI TRACECA Regional Project Logistics Processes and Motorways of the Sea II ENPI contract No. 2011/264 459 Beneficiary countries: Direct the ENPI East partners (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine) and the Central Asia TRACECA countries (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan) Indirect Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey Wider Objectives: This project has been conceived as the followup of three previous TRACECA EU Funded Projects, namely: Motorways of the Sea (MoS) for Black Sea and Caspian Sea International Logistical Centres for Western NIS and Caucasus International Logistical Centres for Central Asia The overall objective of the current project is to contribute to the long term sustainable development of logistics infrastructure and multimodal transport along the TRACECA corridor. The assignment will enhance the development and implementation of coherent strategies for establishment of intermodal integrated transport and logistics chains underpinned by MoS. Specific Project Objectives: By assessing the network from a regional perspective the assignment will ensure that infrastructure and soft projects planned or implemented contribute to the continuity of TRACECA. The focal points entail: 1. Removal of logistical bottlenecks, focusing on those which hamper the flow of goods between ports and the hinterland with the objective of enhancing trade at regional and international levels. 2. Facilitation of efficient flow of goods between Black Sea ports and between Caspian Sea ones, ensuring better interoperable connections from the ports to the hinterland through logistics platforms and improved maritime services. 3. Targeting regulatory framework and sector reforms for port, maritime and logistics operations as well as introduction of port environmental management systems. Results: Result 1: Implementation of the Motorways of the Sea concept through existing and future pilot projects and their hinterland dimension. Result 2: Development and promotion of the concept of regional networks of Logistics Centres and intermodal interfaces. Result 3: Master Plan for the implementation of TRACECA LOGMOS concept Result 4: Technical Assistance National/Regional Regulatory Adjustment Result 5: Communication, Visibility and Information Plan
Progress Report I
Page 11 of 68
Activities: 1A: Maritime dimension of MoS projects Setup of and technical assistance to national, bilateral and regional working groups and task forces on already selected pilot projects Training activities and study tours on bordercrossing related issues Identification, approach and gathering of EU stakeholders and customers Communication and dissemination activities to strengthen awareness of the MoS concept through regional support Assessment and recommendations on feasibility of projects that were not previously selected and new pilot projects Technical assistance aimed at mobilisation of different sources of financing for the implementation of MoS projects Monitoring and reporting on the implementation of the MoS pilot projects 1B: Hinterland dimension of MoS projects Set up of working groups and tasks forces and technical assistance for improving efficiency (including simplification of bordercrossing procedures) and attractiveness of commercial conditions Development and implementation of a restricted number of case studies on connections between ports and logistical zones 2A: Concept of the regional networks of Logistics Centres Setup of bilateral and regional working groups for promoting logistics processes and network possibilities Identification of the core networks between ports and logistics hubs Development of recommendations and guidelines for the TRACECA network of logistics centres Organisation of study tours and training 2B: Logistics Centres projects implementation Identification of interfaces to be adjusted to promote the network of logistics centres Identification and promotion of synergies between identified logistics centres Technical assistance related to establishment of network modalities Followup of feasibility studies and promotion of identified sites, raising awareness and enhancing interest Establishment of a dialogue and cooperation between the promoters and developers of the logistics centres 3: LOGMOS Master Plan Developing recommendations and guidelines for LOGMOS Two/three case studies to be selected and developed as pilot projects, small working groups to be set up to for addressing bottlenecks / defining required technical assistance Support and capacity building for attracting funding
Page 12 of 68
Progress Report I
4: Technical Assistance to Regulatory Adjustments Case study related assessment of maritime and intermodal legislation and environment Organization of training, seminars and working groups to identify changes needed Development of a monitoring mechanism on regulatory adjustments Target Group: Ministries of transport, port and maritime administrations, port and terminal managements, border crossing agencies, transport associations, railway entities, shipping companies, local associations and institutions, business community etc. Beneficiaries: Ministries of Transport of TRACECA memberstates, PS IGC TRACECA Project starting date: Project duration: Long Term Key Experts: Team Leader: Key Expert 2: Key Expert 3: Short Term Experts: Senior Experts: Junior Experts: Project main office: 8, Lysenko Street, office 39, Kiev 01034, Ukraine Tel/Fax: +380 44 234 03 88, +380 44 288 08 92 1,000 MD 1,500 MD 660 MD 660 MD 660 MD 27 April 2011 36 months
Progress Report I
Page 13 of 68
The reporting phase encompasses the first six months of the project implementation from late April 2011 till November 2011. Continuation of stakeholder dialogue and ownership driven implementation were pointed out as a basis for future assignment. The coordination with the European Commission took part throughout the overall project implementation. The project had a dynamic start on 27 April 2011 to ensure a proper follow up and continuity of the previous technical assistance projects on logistics centres and motorways of the sea. The key expert team took over the outputs of the MoS I project, at their final event for the Black Sea in Brussels on 28 April 2011. The kickoff meeting at European Commission was held Brussels on 29 April 2011. The office in Kiev was made operational after the start of the project in the beginning of May 2011. The key experts were mobilised on site after the meetings in Brussels. The core team of short-term experts was gradually mobilised. The project moved its activities from West to the East during the first progress reporting period. All countries of TRACECA were approached during either in missions, or at regional events and TRACECA meetings. The PS was involved in coordination work. The project synopsis was approved by the EC on 18 May 2011. The document streamlined the assignment for LOGMOS to fit it to current situation based on the TOR. The approved version was distributed to beneficiaries and the stakeholders. The EU Delegations in Ukraine, Moldova, Georgia, Kazakhstan, and Tajikistan were informed. The EU Delegation in Ukraine was involved in project registration process. Several regional events and missions to eight out of ten were carried out in the first six months of the project (See Annexes 2 List of Meeting of the Inception and Progress reports I). Team Leader reported on all project activities on a monthly basis to the Project Manager at DEVCO.
3.1
The LOGMOS project is a follow up of three previous TRACECA interlinked projects: Motorways of the Seas in the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea, and International Logistic Centres in the Western NIS and the Caucasus and for Central Asia. These projects identified five MoS pilotprojects and eleven logistics centres approved by the beneficiaries. The previously identified pilot projects vary in terms of scope, relevance for TRACECA corridor, degree of maturity or promotional support in the beneficiary countries. The LOGMOS is to follow-up these pilot projects in terms of updating priorities for project implementation. In the reporting period the project team has identified, discussed and revised action plans for each of the pilot initiatives. The action plans are deemed to be stakeholder owned and serve as a framework for implementation. The dedicated working groups and task forces were formed to implement the action plans. During the reporting period the LOGMOS team started to develop country profiles for all of the beneficiary countries, summarising the current status of the transport sector, transport flows relevant to the project, the process of legal reforms in this sector and existing bottlenecks as a basis for further project activities. The pilot projects may be reassessed and combined with each other in case this increases their efficiency, improves attractiveness for investors or eliminates a missing corridor link. The LOGMOS team encouraged the countries to submit their proposals in logistics and multimodal sectors for evaluation till April 2012 in view of defining the new pilot projects. The
Page 14 of 68
Progress Report I
assessment will be organised by means of Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA) at regional and project levels. The individual projects should contribute to the cohesion of the TRACECA network and hinterland connections needed for optimisation of cargo flows. The MCA will take into account in the provisions of the TEN-T policy review. The LOGMOS TOR charges the project with development of the comprehensive TRACECA motorways of the sea master plan in accordance with the term of reference. The analysis of the beneficiary countries however revealed necessity to include hinterland connections and nodal hubs of landlocked countries in the master plan. Therefore, a LOGMOS master plan is proposed to include both maritime and logistics dimensions.
3.2
Implementation approach
The implementation approach is based on defined activities and implementation phases. Activities have been designed for each defined project result area. Each main activity includes a number of related tasks (1A-1D, 2A-2B, 3A-3C and 4A-4C + 5) which were streamlined in consultations with the beneficiaries and the European Commission. The result of the work program is indicated in the approved project synopsis. In this process the current project context has been analysed taking into account recent developments in the beneficiary countries and the EU TEN-T policy review with an objective to target technical assistance to the beneficiary needs. This process has been implemented in coordination with TRACECA counterparts The tasks which basically lead to achievement of the common performance indicators were streamlined and consolidated. The overall approach is schematically presented in the figure below. Figure 1: Project Approach
3.3
For the activities of the Component 1: Implementation of the Motorways of the Sea and Component 2: Development and promotion of the concept of regional networks of Logistics
Progress Report I
Page 15 of 68
Centres the project team proposed to tackle the achievement of the respective goals through existing and future pilot projects adding their hinterland dimensions. For Component 3 dealing with MoS master plan, the project team proposed to develop a LOGMOS Master Plan in line with directions on the TEN-T policy review applicable for TRACECA. This allows to include the landlocked countries of TRACECA in both core and comprehensive networks capitalising on their hinterland potential. Thus, expanding the MoS master plan to landlocked countries under the LOGMOS umbrella constitutes an additional domain of activities for achievement of result 3. The terms of reference include a Component 4 on national and regional regulatory reforms in the maritime and intermodal sectors. The implementation of this component implies consideration of several factors: First, currently in TRACECA these issues are addressed by various initiatives of national governments, membership in dedicated international organisations like IMO, IRU, IRF, UIC, OSZD or dedicated projects of EU under twinning or national programmes. Donor institutions and international organisations (e.g. UNECE, WCO) promote these issues using their regional mandate. Second, several previous EU TRACECA projects were developing recommendations in this respect. Their implementation is still on-going and put onto the agenda of TRACECA and individual governments. Third, the recommendations on legal basis related to maritime and intermodal sector may require the changes in the national legislation. This process requires a mandate for law making initiative, and is associated with a lengthy process related to law drafting and negotiation with stakeholders involved. At the same time an intensive follow up and promotion of such initiatives is needed, and has to be organised in each beneficiary country concerned.
Adapting similar global approach under into the project mandate will lead to distortion of limited resources. The achievement of tangible results on global issues seems unrealistic during three year of implementation. Therefore, the practical approach of addressing implementable issues on maritime and intermodal issues was opted for. Namely, the project team proposed to address legal change within respective action plans involving task forces of each project. The specific steps and recommendations that do not require the change in primary legislation will be identified and their implementation will be promoted. This component will be implemented as technical assistance to stakeholders to remove specific hindrances to trade related to each pilot project. The pilot project task forces will act as regional trade facilitation working groups given the cross-border nature of MoS and Logistics projects. The overall process will be implemented with the involvement of PS IGC TRACECA. In addition, the project will cooperate with major trade facilitation organisations active in TRACECA region on similar issues to organise information exchange, involve them in the working groups and training measures. The contractor will work closely with the PS on this subject. The overall approach of project implementation will follow the principles of interactive participation of stakeholders and ownership over implementation of the action plans. Progress will be measured in accordance with key performance indications identified and set by the task forces in the framework of action plans. The project team put emphasis on Component 5 Communication, Visibility and Information as a tool to reach the technical results. All events of the project are devoted to specific technical components. Beyond the Progress reports issued every 6 months, the results
Page 16 of 68
Progress Report I
of day-to-day work of the project (Newsletters, Updated Action plans, Country profiles and Conclusions of Regional meetings) will be published in the LOGMOS section of the TRACECA web page. In addition, several supplementary tasks mandated to the project team upon the request of the beneficiaries and identified in the inception phase are listed below: 1. Preparation of the MCA analysis based on the updated EU TEN-T policy review criteria relevant to TRACECA. 2. Extended presentation of the MoS Master Plan as a LOGMOS master plan to allow for inclusion of landlocked counties connections. 3. Collection of trade and transport data for 2010 for the master plan preparation. As of October 2011 the TRACECA database contained data only for 2008 and partly 2009. 4. Co-financing of the PS meetings and PS operative costs from the incidental budget of the LOGMOS team that were not foreseen under the contract of the LOGMOS project. 5. Specific proposals addressed by the beneficiaries and approved by the European Commission as additional tasks of the team. In the inception phase these included supplementary tasks on design and cost estimation of the transport access to the ILC in Yerevan to allow for complete project presentation at the TRACECA investment forum, following the inclusion of this project into the priority programme; and elaboration of specific recommendations on overcoming problems faced by Armenia as a landlocked country. In order to fulfil the principles of targeted and responsive technical assistance, following the approval of the European Commission, additional inputs and budgets for implementation of newly emerged tasks will be determined. At the future stages of the contract implementation, the Contractor shall discuss with the EC and apply for compensation of these resources diverted to additional tasks following the established addendum procedure.
3.4
The important local stakeholders for LOGMOS project are the National Secretaries in each direct and indirect beneficiary country and the PS. The project team perceives TRACECA structures as its main agents and partners to promote the LOGMOS tasks and activities. The project partners are the donor community, logistics platforms, promoters of similar initiatives in the regions, as well as other EU projects. Representatives of IFIs and private and international companies have been approached and invited to the first regional seminar. Cooperation has also been established with relevant EU financed projects at regional and national level. They include: "Transport dialogue and networks interoperability between the EU and its neighbouring countries and Central Asian countries" "Development of security management and maritime safety and ship pollution prevention for the Black Sea and Caspian Sea" "Support to the integration of Ukraine in the Trans European Network TEN T "Ukraine port development feasibility study All TRACECA stakeholders have been informed about the start of the project. Several Bilateral meetings were held with NS or their representatives. All beneficiary countries and the SG of PS IGC TRACECA has been regularly informed about the projects activities. The project team organised the work with TRACECA counterparts and stakeholders:
Progress Report I
Page 17 of 68
within the bilateral meetings at external events round tables and working group meetings in working groups at regional seminars and capacity building measure,
The bilateral meetings held by the project team in this reporting period are presented in the Annex 2. The project has been presented at the following external events:
Country Belgium, Brussels Georgia, Tbilisi Ukraine, Odessa Italy, Milan Bulgaria, Sofia Azerbaijan, Baku Ukraine, Odessa Turkmenistan, Turkmenbashi
Date 28 April 2011 3-4 May 2011 2 June 2011 8 June 2011 14June 2011 16-17 June 2011 14-16 2011 22-23 2011
Event Regional Event of the Black Sea Pilot Projects of the MOS I Tbilisi LED Forum Odessa Transport week Wrapup session of the TRACECA Investment projects in Milan Balkan Intermodal Conference in Sofia Field visit to during the TransCaspian exhibition in Baku
September 5th International Black Sea Container Summit 2011 September Third Joint Meeting of Port Managers of the Caspian Sea Littoral States at Turkmenbashi International Sea Port PS Working Group Meeting of the National Secretaries Expert Working Group meeting on competitiveness of the combined transportation on TRACECA
Georgia, Tbilisi
6 October 2011
Ukraine, Kiev
18 October 2011
First meeting of the Interministerial Working Group on introduction of the project One Window Local Solution under patronage of the State Customs Authority of Ukraine
Ukraine, Odessa
1920 2011
October The 14th International Conference on transport and logistics: Transit potential of Ukraine. Effective infrastructure and logistics on transport in South-East European countries
The following round tables or working group meetings were organised in the TRACECA countries since the project start:
Page 18 of 68
Progress Report I
Country Georgia
Description A field mission of the Team Leader and Key Expert 2 took place in Georgia at the end of July 2011. The round table with the projects stakeholders involved in implementation of the Block container train Poti-Baku and ILC in Tbilisi project were organised. The field mission of Key Expert 2 and Project Coordinator in Georgia was organised to Poti/Batumi and to Sarpi. A joint task force meeting took place with the owner of the Borispol Airport Commerce Park (BACP), the approved site for the International Logistics Centre in Kiev, and the railway design institute involved in designing the passenger railway link to Borispol airport. Information on the project progress concerning the inclusion of a freight link to the ILC site was exchanged.
Ukraine
July 2011
Azerbaijan
August 2011 / Bilateral meeting and working group meeting of the experts of September the TRACECA National Commission under authority of the 2011 TRACECA National Secretary of Azerbaijan on action plans implementation. The working group meeting was conducted by the team leader
Georgia
August 2011
Task force meeting on land use issue for the TAM land, operation for the TAM/Veli site, involvement of the Georgian Railways and the Georgian railways Transcontainer (GRTC) expressed its readiness to cooperate with the project. Working group meeting on the LOGMOS action plans with participation of Ukraine first meeting of the joint working group of the stakeholder representing Customs service, Ukrainian railways and representatives of the private sector. During the meeting the LOGMOS issues in Ukraine (action plans on BSAP 1, Borispol ILC, Euroterminal ILC) were discussed at the Ministry of Infrastructure with the concerned stakeholders to monitor the progress since the regional meeting in July 2011.
Ukraine
September 2011
Based on the Logical framework approach (Annex 1) the performance indicators were identified. The progress of their achievement is summarised in the table below:
Outputs PI: Project inception a) Project Mobilisation b) Adjustment on the work Agreed Objective Verifiable Comments Indicators 1 Kick off in Brussels Core project team completely mobilised 29.04.2011 By July 2011 Status achieved achieved
Progress Report I
Page 19 of 68
Outputs plan
Agreed Objective Verifiable Comments Indicators Project office established May 2011
Status achieved
Regional field missions took place in beneficiary countries Counterpart structures established Preparation, distribution and update of action plans on 5 MoS identified projects and further action plans for new projects National, bilateral and regional working groups and task forces on 5 MoS pilot projects are set up and work within the first year of the project National, bilateral and regional working groups and task forces set up for LOGMOS additional projects At least one international stakeholder interested in development of pilot projects is identified
All countries were approach in the inception phase in field missions or during events
achieved
1A: Maritime dimension of MoS projects a) Training activities and study tours b) Dialogue with a gathering of EU stakeholders and customers c) Communication and dissemination activities to strengthen the dissemination and awareness of the MoS concept through regional support d) Assessment and recommendations on feasibility of previously unselected and new pilot projects e) Technical assistance aimed at mobilisation of different sources of financing for the implementation of MoS projects f) Monitoring and reporting on the implementation of the MoS pilot projects
In progress, on track
In progress, National working groups / task forces on track are set up in Ukraine, Azerbaijan, Georgia
International stakeholders as UND, UTICAD, Maersk, CMA, Sea Link, Polzug, etc are involved in project implementation
In progress, on track
1B: Hinterland dimension of MoS projects a) Set up of working groups and task forces and technical
Shipping line updates for Black Sea and Caspian Sea are issued every six months and included into the reports
st
In progress, on track
Page 20 of 68
Progress Report I
Outputs assistance for improving efficiency. b) Development and implementation of a restricted number of case studies on connections between ports and logistical zones
Agreed Objective Verifiable Comments Indicators In 13 beneficiary countries assessment and recommendations on feasibility of previously unselected and new pilot projects is implemented Technical assistance aimed at mobilisation of different sources of financing for the implementation of MoS projects milestones to be defined as fit for each reporting period Set up of the key performance indicators for pilot projects and updates Under implementation
NA
In progress, Included into the action plan. Subject on track is being discussed with the stakeholders Distributed in July 2011 Updates in October 2011 for ILCs in Western Part In progress, National working groups / task forces on track are set up in Ukraine, Azerbaijan, Georgia In progress, on track
2A: Concept of the regional networks of Logistics Centres a) Setup of bilateral and regional working groups to promote logistics processes and network possibilities b) Identification of the core networks between ports and logistics hubs c) Development of recommendations and guidelines for TRACECA network of the logistics centres d) Study tours and training organisation 2B: Logistics Centres projects implementation a) Identification of interfaces to be adjusted to promote the network of logistics
Preparation, distribution and update of action plans on 11 ILC identified projects and further action plans for additional projects National, bilateral and regional working groups or task forces on 11 ILC pilot projects as required for scope and status of individual project are set up and work within the first year of the project National, bilateral and regional working groups and task forces set up for LOGMOS additional projects (common indicator as in the Result 1)
Progress Report I
Page 21 of 68
Outputs centres b) Identification and promotion of synergies between identified logistics centres c) Technical assistance related to establishment of network modalities d) Follow up of feasibility studies and promotion of identified sites, raising awareness and enhancing interest e) Establishment of a dialogue and cooperation between the promoters and developers of the logistics centres 3: LOGMOS Master Plan a) Developing recommendations and guidelines for LOGMOS
Agreed Objective Verifiable Comments Indicators Core links between ports and logistics hubs are identified for all beneficiary countries MCA basis has been prepared in July 2011 Work on country profiles to be published online has started Not yet relevant for the first reporting phase
One action plan / guidelines for TRACECA network of the logistics centres Interface projects adjusted to promote the network of logistics centres are adapted 11 feasibility studies are followed up
NA
Updates of the action plans took place for the logistics centres. Follow up in the framework of the action plans takes place MCA methodology basis has been created / publication of the TEN-T policy review is essential for this work In progress Slight postponeme nt of the activities
b) Two/three case studies to be selected and developed as pilot projects, small working groups to be set up to for addressing bottlenecks / defining required technical assistance c) Support and capacity building for attracting
MCA for LOGMOS project identification methodology agreed in the first year of implementation (also relevant to results 1 and 2) MCA runs on project proposals (also relevant to Results 1 and 2) 2 3 case studies on connections between ports and logistical zones (also relevant to Results 1 and 2)
NA
NA
The 1st case study on the CBA for the Block Container train is under elaboration
Page 22 of 68
Progress Report I
Outputs funding
Agreed Objective Verifiable Comments Indicators LOGMOS projects identified for Annual TRACECA Investment Forum (also relevant to Results 1 and 2) A project on road access to the Yerevan logistics centre is being prepared (additional task on road layout and cost calculations are being completed) The project team has started preparations for development of the documents for the TIF for Georgia (subject to final decision of the Government)
4: Technical Assistance to Regulatory Adjustments a) Case study related assessment of maritime and intermodal legislation and environment b) Organization of training, seminars, working groups to identify changes needed c) Development of a monitoring mechanism on regulatory adjustments
Assessment of maritime and intermodal legislation and environment relevant to action plans
The provisions are included in all action plans The recommendations of the EU TRACECA SASEPOL project for MoS part Work started on CBA for the block container train (environment)
Incorporated into the action plans. Activities will be advanced in the next reporting period Activities will be advanced in the next reporting period Prepared and delivered in the inception phase
Tailored training on ad hoc basis for pilot project stakeholders Communication , dissemination and awareness plan / media strategy framework prepared in the inception period Web portal based on TRACECA site launched in the inception phase and updated minimum once a month
NA
5: Communication, Information, Awareness a) Communication, dissemination and awareness plan / media strategy and implementation b) Cooperation with ENPI Info Centre c) Web portal based on TRACECA site and team room for
Project webpage launched in June 2011 Prepared, regular updated (once a week) take place
Progress Report I
Page 23 of 68
Outputs knowledge base on MoS and Logistics and online library d) Cooperation platform meetings of project owners e) Final project dissemination f) Study tours on MoS and Logistics in Turkey and EU g) Dedicated training workshops / capacity building measure (ad hoc basis) h) TRACECA investment forums support in preparation and technical docs (TIF)
Agreed Objective Verifiable Comments Indicators Dissemination materials prepared every six months to all TRACECA beneficiaries Project reports are issued on schedule (inception report in July 2011, progress report 1 in October 2011) Promotion materials were designed (brochures, memory cards) Cooperation platform meetings / round tables of project owners in countries and bilateral held at least two every six months Cooperation platform meetings in 11 conferences (April October 2011) Including a cooperation meeting with the project stakeholders in Turkmenistan 5 Round tables and working group meetings (April October 2011) Five project regional meetings for the countries of Black Sea and Central Asia
Black Sea Regional In progress, ahead the Meeting in July plan 2011 Caucasus, Caspian Sea and Central Asia regional meeting in October 2011 Planned for June 2012 Planned for June 2013 Planned for inclusion into study tour programmes NA NA
Two study tours on MoS and Logistics for all TRACECA countries
Four training measures (on ad hoc basis) in working groups Final project dissemination ( 1 event )
NA
Page 24 of 68
Progress Report I
4 4.1
The overall plan of operation is presented in Table 1 of the present report. The quick start and intensive follow up helped assure a smooth continuity of activities between the former ILC and MoS projects and the LOGMOS project. The plan of operations was adjusted to current requirements of the beneficiaries to allow for a certain degree of flexibility in delivery of the technical assistance in line with the TOR. Any activities that result in deviations or supplementary tasks were and will be provided for consideration of the European Commission to define a modus operandi. The project will be implemented in three years with six month sequence of reporting. The reports will reflect major milestones achieved by the project. Some technical components of the projects are implemented in parallel from the beginning of the project. This includes a follow-up to Component 1 dealing with MoS projects and Component 2 on ILCs. With growing maturity and implementation of the most promising pilot projects, and with identification of new initiatives on the missing links in the second year of implementation, the project team will proceed with the LOGMOS master plan envisaged under Component 3. The technical assistance for regulatory changes will be in the project teams focus in the second reporting phase, once the relevant country profiles are updated and action plans are agreed. Component 5 will accompany all technical work packages of the LOGMOS project. Tentatively the project is split into three phases corresponding to each year of implementation. Figure 2: LOGMOS Planning
The tentative contents of the project work is summarised below following the determined steps for each subsequent reporting phase. The results achieved will materialise in the outputs of the project team and will be partly published online or in the subsequent progress reports. Also for each reporting period a tentative mission schedule is presented, as orientation for the beneficiaries in terms of the mission contents, and steps to take.
4.2
The main outputs of this reporting phase will be the MCA methodology, further elaboration of Country profiles, definition of the KPIs for the action plans, working on the legal issues and update of the inland waterways report. In terms of events, the project team plans a working group meeting for the railways on the issues of purely sectoral character related to implementation of the action plans of the Black
Progress Report I
Page 25 of 68
Sea motorways, and the third regional technical seminar for the TRACECA countries in Brussels. The field missions will be organised on the ad hoc basis to solve specific issues related to the actions plans, or to prepare ground for further implementation. The summary tables on report outputs, missions and regional events are presented below. Report Work to be implemented MCA Outputs
Draft MOU / Committed Work on project identification has statement on support of the started pilot projects Work on conferences, in countries Tentative training plan and in Europe on attraction of the Updated inland waterways international stakeholders to study participation in pilot projects. Publication of Country Work on definition of the KPIs, profiles Elaboration of the monitoring Shipping line newsletter indicators for the action plans Elaboration of the training programme (themes and contents) Work on sources of funding Upgrade of the inland waterway study Finalising/Update of the Country profiles Shipping line updating Assistance in project preparation for the annual investment forum
Purpose
Participants
IGC meeting, coordination meeting Key experts with the EC Upgrade Danube of of the the information information on Short-term experts on Key experts, experts Key experts, experts short-term
Chisinau
Upgrade Danube
Follow up of the action plans Georgia Working group of the railways short-term
Page 26 of 68
Progress Report I
Follow up of the action plans Armenia Follow up of the action plan Support to the TIF presentation of ILC Zvartnots, Yerevan Azerbaijan Follow up of Alyat action plan fact Short-term experts finding mission on the Alyat port Follow up of action plans for ferry lines to Aktau and Turkmenbashi Working group meeting in spring Key experts 2012 Uzbekistan Kyrgyzstan Turkey Follow up of the action plan Follow up of the action plan Preparation of the study tour Update on the participation of the international stakeholders Germany Ukraine Brussels Update on the participation of the Key experts international stakeholders Follow up of the action plans Working group of the railways Coordination meeting Preparation of the TRACECA regional technical seminar Key Experts Short-term experts Key experts Key experts Key experts Key experts Short-term experts
Countries
3rd TRACECA Follow up of the action plans and All TRACECA regional LOGMOS progress technical seminar February March 2012
The working groups are planned in the countries of Central Asia and in Azerbaijan. The tentative schedule is presented below.
Progress Report I
Page 27 of 68
Events
Nov 2011
Dec 2011
Jan 2012
Mar 2012
Apr 2012
Regional meetings Multilateral meetings Country Working Groups/ Task Forces Kazakhstan Ukraine Georgia Armenia Georgia Kyrgyzstan Ad hoc basis in other countries
Kazakhstan
Azerbaijan
Uzbekistan
Armenia
4.3
This reporting phase will focus on MCA elaboration and presentation of the short-list for the new pilot projects; the action plans for the new projects will be elaborated. In terms of events, the project team plans a regional study tour for the beneficiaries, and ad hoc training measures required for implementation of the pilot projects. The multilateral working groups will be conducted in the framework of the regional events. The field missions will be organised as planned on the follow up subjects and on issues of the master plan elaboration. The activities are summarised briefly in the following tables. Report Work to be implemented Outputs
Progress report MCA runs on new proposals MCA results assessment III matrix and short list Preparation and distribution of the April 2012 action plans for the new projects 2-3 Action plans for the new / combined projects October 2012 Set up of the working groups on additional projects Country profiles online update Elaboration of the methodology basis for the master plan, Methodology basis for the elaboration of the contents of the master plan master plan report Draft action plan / guidelines Updating country profiles for the TRACECA network of the logistics centres Drafting action plan / guidelines for the TRACECA network of the logistics centres Dissemination materials will be
Page 28 of 68
Progress Report I
Updates for the cross-references for Key experts, the master plan experts Updates for the cross-references for Key experts, the master plan experts
Ad hoc missions Ad hoc questions - the missions will Key experts, to direct be planned in greater detail in the experts beneficiary next reporting period countries
Regional Contents Events / Time frame June 2012 Study tour and training
Countries
Direct stakeholders and project owners (max. 3 persons per country), profiles to be defined of the pilot TRACECA
September 2012 Regional Meeting for Central Asia Stakeholders and Caucasus project, institutions Regional Meeting for the Black Sea region Ad hoc basis
Specific trainings will be Direct stakeholders and implemented as per training project owners, Stakeholders schedule
The schematic presentation of the event plan is shown in the figure below.
Progress Report I
Page 29 of 68
Events
May 2012
July 2012
Aug 2012
Sep 2012 Black Sea Central Asia and Caucasus Ad hoc basis TRACECA
Oct 2012
Regional meetings
Multilateral meetings Country Working Groups / Task Forces Ad hoc basis TRACECA
Ad hoc basis TRACECA Ad hoc basis TRACECA Ad hoc basis TRACECA Ad hoc basis TRACECA
4.4
This reporting period starts in a year from now. The team plans to be ready to present a draft master plan report as a first paper for discussion in countries. The core network definition for LOGMOS will be proposed and discussed. The candidate case studies will be nominated for elaboration. The approval of the European Commission in consultation with the beneficiaries will be needed for their elaboration. The work on the legal part will be coming to its finalisation: the monitoring mechanism on regulatory adjustment will be prepared and included into the master plan. In term of regional events, the regional meeting for the Black Sea is planned for April May 2013. The meeting will be organised for the stakeholders of the Black Sea area action plan projects to report on the progress. Some multilateral working groups may be conducted during this event. The framework planning for this phase is presented below. Progress report Working on the master plan Draft master plan report IV October Work on core network (infrastructure Draft analysis of the core 2012 -April 2013 and trade) analysis network Updating the of the action plans Assistance in project preparation for the TRACECA annual investment Updated action plans forums Monitoring mechanism on Working on report on regulatory regulatory adjustments adjustments summary methodology and approach will be included into the Work on the project proposals for the master plan. investment forum
Dissemination materials will be prepared to all TRACECA beneficiaries
The detailed planning for this phase will be presented in April 2012.
Page 30 of 68
Progress Report I
4.5
During this reporting period the project team will continue the work on the master plan. The team will be in close contact with the representatives of countries to discuss the provisions of the master plans. The definition of the core network for LOGMOS will be finalised. The draft case studies will be prepared and submitted for review with the beneficiaries. The strict deadlines on agreement of approach and methodology at the beneficiary level will be essential at this stage in order to assure the duly completion of the case studies. The activities will be coordinated with the European Commission and the beneficiaries. The legal part of the project will be finalised and included into the master plan following the comments of the previous phase. In term of regional events, the project team plan to organise the second study tour for the beneficiaries, the tailored training measures will be associated with this event. The multilateral working group meetings and country working groups will be implemented as scheduled at the beginning of the reporting period. The scope of work in this phase is summarised below: Progress report Working on the master plan Updated draft master plan V April 2013 report Continuation of work on core October 2013 network (infrastructure and trade) Draft case studies analysis Updating the of the action plans Assistance in project preparation for the TRACECA annual investment forums Working on report on regulatory adjustments summary Elaboration of the case studies The detailed planning for this phase will be presented in October 2012.
4.6
The final phase of the project will be devoted to polishing of the master plan and issuing the final version of the case studies. The project team will concentrate on presenting the action plan on future steps and recommendations based on the LOGMOS master plan. This will take a form of updated documents for the rest of the steps needed to be moved in each of the pilot projects. The final event will be organised to summarise the work done and to determine the steps for the future initiatives based on ownership driven implementation. The outputs to be delivered with the two last reports of the project as shown in the table below comprise the LOSMOS master plan and the case studies.
Progress Report I
Page 31 of 68
Draft final report Work on master plan and case Draft final master plan studies Draft final case studies October 2013 February 2014 Final report Work on master plan and case Final master plan studies February 2014 Final case studies April 2014 Recommendations future The detailed planning for this phase will be presented in April 2013.
for
the
Page 32 of 68
Progress Report I
2012
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
SE 1000 JE 1500
a b
x x x
x x x x x x x x x x x x x X x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
Maritime 1A dimension/MoS a
Training / study tours
Progress Report I
Page 33 of 68
Beneficiary countries: Project title: LOGMOS Project number 2011/264459 : Direct: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Number of Tajikistan and Turkmenistan Pages: 9 Indirect: Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey Planning period : 27 April 2011 27 April 2014 Project objective: The overall objective of the current project is to contribute to the long term sustainable development of the logistics infrastructure and multimodal transport along the TRACECA corridor.
No MAIN ACTIVITIES TIME FRAME 2011
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5
2012
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
Page 34 of 68
Progress Report I
Beneficiary countries: Project title: LOGMOS Project number 2011/264459 : Direct: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Number of Tajikistan and Turkmenistan Pages: 9 Indirect: Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey Planning period : 27 April 2011 27 April 2014 Project objective: The overall objective of the current project is to contribute to the long term sustainable development of the logistics infrastructure and multimodal transport along the TRACECA corridor.
No MAIN ACTIVITIES TIME FRAME 2011
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5
2012
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
Regional 2A networks
ILC
Progress Report I
Page 35 of 68
Beneficiary countries: Project title: LOGMOS Project number 2011/264459 : Direct: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Number of Tajikistan and Turkmenistan Pages: 9 Indirect: Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey Planning period : 27 April 2011 27 April 2014 Project objective: The overall objective of the current project is to contribute to the long term sustainable development of the logistics infrastructure and multimodal transport along the TRACECA corridor.
No MAIN ACTIVITIES TIME FRAME 2011
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5
2012
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
ILC 2B implementation
Page 36 of 68
Progress Report I
Beneficiary countries: Project title: LOGMOS Project number 2011/264459 : Direct: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Number of Tajikistan and Turkmenistan Pages: 9 Indirect: Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey Planning period : 27 April 2011 27 April 2014 Project objective: The overall objective of the current project is to contribute to the long term sustainable development of the logistics infrastructure and multimodal transport along the TRACECA corridor.
No MAIN ACTIVITIES TIME FRAME 2011
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5
2012
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
b c d
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
Progress Report I
Page 37 of 68
Beneficiary countries: Project title: LOGMOS Project number 2011/264459 : Direct: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Number of Tajikistan and Turkmenistan Pages: 9 Indirect: Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey Planning period : 27 April 2011 27 April 2014 Project objective: The overall objective of the current project is to contribute to the long term sustainable development of the logistics infrastructure and multimodal transport along the TRACECA corridor.
No MAIN ACTIVITIES TIME FRAME 2011
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5
2012
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
X
case
Page 38 of 68
Progress Report I
Beneficiary countries: Project title: LOGMOS Project number 2011/264459 : Direct: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Number of Tajikistan and Turkmenistan Pages: 9 Indirect: Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey Planning period : 27 April 2011 27 April 2014 Project objective: The overall objective of the current project is to contribute to the long term sustainable development of the logistics infrastructure and multimodal transport along the TRACECA corridor.
No MAIN ACTIVITIES TIME FRAME 2011
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5
2012
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
Progress Report I
Page 39 of 68
Beneficiary countries: Project title: LOGMOS Project number 2011/264459 : Direct: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Number of Tajikistan and Turkmenistan Pages: 9 Indirect: Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey Planning period : 27 April 2011 27 April 2014 Project objective: The overall objective of the current project is to contribute to the long term sustainable development of the logistics infrastructure and multimodal transport along the TRACECA corridor.
No MAIN ACTIVITIES TIME FRAME 2011
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5
2012
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
b c
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
X X
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
Page 40 of 68
Progress Report I
Beneficiary countries: Project title: LOGMOS Project number 2011/264459 : Direct: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Number of Tajikistan and Turkmenistan Pages: 9 Indirect: Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey Planning period : 27 April 2011 27 April 2014 Project objective: The overall objective of the current project is to contribute to the long term sustainable development of the logistics infrastructure and multimodal transport along the TRACECA corridor.
No MAIN ACTIVITIES TIME FRAME 2011
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5
2012
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
X X X
x x x x
x x x x
x x x x
x x x x
x x x x
x x x x
x x x x
x x x x
x x x x
x x x x
x x x x
x x x x
x x x x
x x x x
x x x x
x x x x
x x x x
x x x x
x x x x
x x x x
x x x x
x x x x
x x x x
TOTAL
KE 2 660 KE 3 660
Progress Report I
Page 41 of 68
The overall objective of the current project is to contribute to the long term sustainable development of the logistics infrastructure and multimodal transport along the TRACECA corridor.
Outputs
Assumptions
1 Kick off in Brussels Core project team completely mobilised Project office established
Office established Availability and participation of the counterpart staff to engage in meetings, project steering and working panels Timely response on Contractors requests by the beneficiaries
Regional field missions took place in beneficiary countries Counterpart structures established
Page 42 of 68
Progress Report I
Beneficiary countries: Project title: LOGMOS Project number : 2011/264459 Number Direct: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia, of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan Pages: 7 Indirect: Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey EC Contractor : Egis International / Dornier Consulting
The overall objective of the current project is to contribute to the long term sustainable development of the logistics infrastructure and multimodal transport along the TRACECA corridor.
1A: Maritime dimension of MoS projects g) Training activities and study tours h) Dialogue with a gathering of EU stakeholders and customers i) Communication and dissemination activities to strengthen the dissemination and awareness of the MoS concept through regional support Assessment and recommendations on feasibility of previously unselected and new pilot projects
Preparation, distribution and update of action plans on 5 MoS identified projects and further action plans for new projects National, bilateral and regional working groups and task forces on 5 MoS pilot projects are set up and work within the first year of the project National, bilateral and regional working groups and task forces set up for LOGMOS additional projects At least one international stakeholder interested in development of pilot projects is identified
Availability and participation of the counterpart staff Favourable regional relations between countries Favourable investment environment in the countries Countries remain committed to the results of the previous projects Stakeholders are willing to cooperate under the format of a task force and remain active in implementation of the results Customs and other border authorities provide full support to implementation of the project Stakeholders are ready to capitalize on other project success stories to enable a quicker implementation of pilot projects and technical regulatory/normative reforms
j)
k) Technical assistance aimed at mobilisation of different sources of financing for the implementation of MoS projects l) Monitoring and reporting on the implementation of the MoS pilot projects
Progress Report I
Page 43 of 68
Beneficiary countries: Project title: LOGMOS Project number : 2011/264459 Number Direct: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia, of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan Pages: 7 Indirect: Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey EC Contractor : Egis International / Dornier Consulting
The overall objective of the current project is to contribute to the long term sustainable development of the logistics infrastructure and multimodal transport along the TRACECA corridor.
1B: Hinterland dimension of MoS projects c) d) Set up of working groups and task forces and technical assistance for improving efficiency.
Development and implementation of a restricted number of case studies on connections between ports and logistical zones
Shipping line updates for Black Sea and Caspian Sea are issued every six months and included into the reports In 13 beneficiary countries assessment and recommendations on feasibility of previously unselected and new pilot projects is implemented Technical assistance aimed at mobilisation of different sources of financing for the implementation of MoS projects milestones to be defined as fit for each reporting period Set up of the key performance indicators for pilot projects and updates For events see Result 5: Communication, Visibility and Information Plan
The beneficiaries pursue committed action in terms of necessary legal adjustments Free access to the project sites, availability of information and documents IFIs strategies fit TRACECA objectives Country governmental policies allow for IFI funding and loans remain a possible instrument of public investments Interest of the international stakeholders in the region Strategies of the international shipping business include activities in the TRACECA region Investment forums are organised
Page 44 of 68
Progress Report I
Beneficiary countries: Project title: LOGMOS Project number : 2011/264459 Number Direct: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia, of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan Pages: 7 Indirect: Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey EC Contractor : Egis International / Dornier Consulting
The overall objective of the current project is to contribute to the long term sustainable development of the logistics infrastructure and multimodal transport along the TRACECA corridor.
2A: Concept of the regional networks of Logistics Centres e) Setup of bilateral and regional working groups to promote logistics processes and network possibilities f) Identification of the core networks between ports and logistics hubs g) Development of recommendations and guidelines for TRACECA network of the logistics centres h) Study tours and training organisation 2B: Logistics Centres projects implementation f) Identification of interfaces to be adjusted to promote the network of logistics centres g) Identification and promotion of synergies between identified logistics centres h) Technical assistance related to establishment of network modalities i) Follow up of feasibility studies and promotion of identified sites, raising awareness and enhancing interest j) Establishment of a dialogue and cooperation between the promoters and developers of the logistics centres
Preparation, distribution and update of action plans on 11 ILC identified projects and further action plans for additional projects National, bilateral and regional working groups or task forces on 11 ILC pilot projects as required for scope and status of individual project are set up and work within the first year of the project National, bilateral and regional working groups and task forces set up for LOGMOS additional projects (common indicator as in the Result 1) Core links between ports and logistics hubs are identified for all beneficiary countries One action plan / guidelines for TRACECA network of the logistics centres Interface projects adjusted to promote the network of logistics centres are adapted 11 feasibility studies are followed up
Countries remain committed to the results achieved in the previous projects Policies are favourable to implementation Customs sector is willing to cooperate and introduce change Recommendations of the project are actively followed up by the tasks forces and promoted by the participants of the action plans Countries relations are not undergoing regional tensions Stakeholders are promoting a regional approach International stakeholders are interested in exploiting new business opportunities in the transport sector in TRACECA Decision making is consistent and appropriate Stakeholders at the national level realise the potential of the network and understand the winning results from participation
Progress Report I
Page 45 of 68
Beneficiary countries: Project title: LOGMOS Project number : 2011/264459 Number Direct: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia, of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan Pages: 7 Indirect: Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey EC Contractor : Egis International / Dornier Consulting
The overall objective of the current project is to contribute to the long term sustainable development of the logistics infrastructure and multimodal transport along the TRACECA corridor.
3: LOGMOS Master Plan d) Developing recommendations and guidelines for LOGMOS e) Two/three case studies to be selected and developed as pilot projects, small working groups to be set up to for addressing bottlenecks / defining required technical assistance f) Support and capacity building for attracting funding
MCA for LOGMOS project identification methodology agreed in the first year of implementation (also relevant to results 1 and 2) MCA runs on project proposals (also relevant to Results 1 and 2) 2 3 case studies on connections between ports and logistical zones (also relevant to Results 1 and 2) LOGMOS projects identified for Annual TRACECA Investment Forum (also relevant to Results 1 and 2)
Countries are available for consultations Decision making process is favourable for the project environment Decision making is clear and consistent Counterpart staff remains committed and proactive in terms of implementation IFIs remain committed to improvement of the infrastructure in the region Availability of funds and programmes Country macroeconomic policies envisage external borrowing TRACECA investment forum is organised Ports are following the strategy of regional development and understand benefits from partnership
Page 46 of 68
Progress Report I
Beneficiary countries: Project title: LOGMOS Project number : 2011/264459 Number Direct: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia, of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan Pages: 7 Indirect: Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey EC Contractor : Egis International / Dornier Consulting
The overall objective of the current project is to contribute to the long term sustainable development of the logistics infrastructure and multimodal transport along the TRACECA corridor.
4: Technical Assistance to Regulatory Adjustments d) Case study related assessment of maritime and intermodal legislation and environment e) Organization of training, seminars, working groups to identify changes needed f) Development of a monitoring mechanism on regulatory adjustments
Assessment of maritime and intermodal legislation and environment relevant to action plans Monitoring mechanism on regulatory adjustments Tailored training on ad hoc basis for pilot project stakeholders
Legal mechanisms allow for prompt changes and counterpart staff remains committed to the implementation of the recommendations PS counterpart is available for consultations International stakeholders remain interested in the TRACECA region
Progress Report I
Page 47 of 68
Beneficiary countries: Project title: LOGMOS Project number : 2011/264459 Number Direct: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia, of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan Pages: 7 Indirect: Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey EC Contractor : Egis International / Dornier Consulting
The overall objective of the current project is to contribute to the long term sustainable development of the logistics infrastructure and multimodal transport along the TRACECA corridor.
5: Communication, Information, Awareness i) Communication, dissemination and awareness plan / media strategy and implementation j) Cooperation with ENPI Info Centre k) Web portal based on TRACECA site and team room for knowledge base on MoS and Logistics and online library l) Cooperation platform meetings of project owners m) Final project dissemination n) Study tours on MoS and Logistics in Turkey and EU o) Dedicated training workshops / capacity building measure (ad hoc basis) p) TRACECA investment forums support in preparation and technical docs (TIF)
Communication , dissemination and awareness plan / media strategy framework prepared in the inception period Web portal based on TRACECA site launched in the inception phase and updated minimum once a month Dissemination materials prepared every six months to all TRACECA beneficiaries Cooperation platform meetings / round tables of project owners in countries and bilateral held at least two every six months Five project regional meetings for the countries of Black Sea and Central Asia Two study tours on MoS and Logistics for all TRACECA countries Four training measures (on ad hoc basis) in working groups Final project dissemination ( 1 event )
Counterpart staff is available for consultations and participation at events Beneficiaries respond to contractors requests and suggestions Counterparts remain committed to implementation and assist in organisation of meetings in their respective countries
Page 48 of 68
Progress Report I
Beneficiary countries: Project title: LOGMOS Project number : 2011/264459 Direct: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Republic of Moldova, Ukraine, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Number of Pages: 3 Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan Indirect: Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey Planning period : 27 April 2011 27 April 2014 Prepared on: 27 October 2011 EC Contractor : Egis International / Dornier Consulting
Project objective: The overall objective of the current project is to contribute to the long term sustainable development of the logistics infrastructure and multimodal transport along the TRACECA corridor. RESOURCES/INPUTS PERSONNEL Team Leader Key Experts II Key Expert III Senior Short Term Experts Junior Short Term Experts OTHER INPUTS (%) (incidental expenditures) 100% 17% <17% <17% >83% 660 MD 660 MD 660 MD 1000 MD 1500 MD 120 120 120 209 315 126 128 111,5 137,5 230 126 128 111,5 137,5 230 534 532 548,5 862,5 1270 TOTAL PLANNED PERIOD PLANNED PERIOD REALISED TOTAL REALISED AVAILABLE FOR REMAINDER
Progress Report I
Page 49 of 68
Table 4: Plan of Operations for the Next Period (Work Programme) (1)
Project title: LOGMOS Project number : 2011/264459 Beneficiary countries: Direct: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Republic of Moldova, Ukraine, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan Indirect: Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey Planning period : 27 April 2011 27 April 2014 Project objective: The overall objective of the current project is to contribute to the long term sustainable development of the logistics infrastructure and multimodal transport along the TRACECA corridor. Prepared on: 27 October 2011 EC Contractor : Egis International / Dornier Consulting Number Pages: 3 of
2011 (months) No
PI a b 1A a b c d e
ACTIVITY
Project inception Mobilisation Work plan Maritime dimension/MoS
Training / study tours Dialogue with EU stakeholders Communication and dissemination Assessment of new pilot projects TA on funding mobilisation
Nov
INPUTS PERSONNEL Key Non key Experts Experts TL 100 KE II 100 KE III 100 SE 128 JE 195
OTHER
x x
x x x x x
x x x x x x
x x
X X
x x
x x
Page 50 of 68
Progress Report I
f 1B a b 2A a
x x x
X X X
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
Hinterland dimension/MOS
Working groups and tasks force Case studies
x x
X X
x x
x x
x x
x x
d 2B a
ILC implementation
Interfaces to pursue the network of logistics centres
b c d e 3 a b c
Synergies between logistics centres Network modalities Follow up of feasibility studies Stakeholder Dialogue
x x x x
Progress Report I
Page 51 of 68
TA to Regulatory Adjustments
Case study related assessments Trainings, seminars Monitoring mechanism
a b c 5
x x x x
X X X X
x x x x
x x x x
x x x x
x x x x
a b c d
x x x
X X X
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x x
e f g h
Final project dissemination Study tours Capacity building measures Support in (TIF)
x x x
SE 128 JE 195
Page 52 of 68
Progress Report I
The Project team has presented their activities in beneficiary countries from August 2011 till October 2011 in the geographic dimension. The activities during inception period have been covered in the Inception report end of July 2011. Such perspective allows to provide a different view onto the implemented work on technical components.
Armenia
The activities in Armenia contained work on regular project assignments and on the additional tasks the project team was charged with. 1: Pilot projects The beneficiary expressed a need for the LOGMOS project support in preparation of the documents for the TRACECA Investment forum 2012. Additional to the results of the ILC project in Zvartnots an updated map showing the new transport access to the ILC site is intented to be presented to the potential investor. In this respect the review of the feasibility study of the former ILC Project has started with the view of inclusion of the updated socioeconomic data into the cost-benefit analysis of the concerned investment project. The action plan was discussed at the Tbilisi regional seminar in October 2011. 2: Concept of the regional networks of Logistics Centres and Implementation 3: LOGMOS Master Plan A draft country profile for Armenia has been prepared with the analysis of the logistics capabilities of Armenian transport sector. The inland dry ports and the land transport infrastructure have been evaluated. The document will serve a basis for elaboration of the LOGMOS master plan. Further work will be coordinated with the IDEA project in terms of data consistency. 4: Technical Assistance to Regulatory Adjustments The initial provisions were included into the country profile. The project team will address specific issues within the action plan prepared for Armenia.
5: Communication, The country profile is prepared for the internet upload. Information, The representatives of Armenia took part at Tbilisi regional seminar. Awareness Additional Tasks Following the request of the beneficiary, the work to support the design of new transport access, connecting the ILC Zvartnots site to newly planned road investment projects (ADB financed North-South corridor and Yerevan city centre by-pass) and the railway network were implemented.
Progress Report I
Page 53 of 68
The task has been discussed with the TRACECA National Secretary. The Ministry of Transport and Communication of Armenia provided extensive support in obtaining recent data, organization of the site visit and elaboration of the task. The project team has developed a cost-benefit analysis for the proposed options for road connection. The work was based on a concept plan approved by all sides. The work on the report on the transport access to the ILC site shall be finished by end of November 2011. A draft road map for the acquisition of a maritime flag for Armenia was handed over the beneficiary.
Azerbaijan
The activities in Azerbaijan contained work on regular project assignments devoted to the work on the action plans. 1: Pilot projects The six Action plans concerning Azerbaijan were discussed during a round table meeting of the task force in Baku on 2nd September 2011. A separate meeting took take place 1st September with Caspar Shipping Company. During the meetings, substantial progress was announced in the field of future customs procedures in Azerbaijan and a positive position of Azerbaijan Railways was stated concerning the issue of the Block train Poti - Baku (within the framework of the overall 1.5 bn. USD railway modernisation plan of Azerbaijan), although no formal agreement has been signed with the Georgian side, yet. This MOU on this subject is planned to be signed in November at the meeting of the Deputy Heads of the Railways, as announced by the stakeholder delegation from Azerbaijan at the Tbilisi regional seminar. The project team will follow up the subject in the next reporting phase. 2: Concept of the regional networks of Logistics Centres and Implementation The draft country profile for Azerbaijan has been prepared to include the provisions on the role of country in the international trade. The position of Alyat logistics centre at the new Caspian sea gateway of Azerbaijan is crucial for regional development. The logistics centre in Alyat is the key link for the regional supply chain establishment. For Azerbaijan the ILC at Alyat is deemed to contribute to the solution of the problem with empty return of wagons to the direction of Aktau. The action plans contain provisions on regional cooperation aimed at establishment of the solid logistics network on TRACECA in terms of infrastructure and service quality. 3: LOGMOS Master Plan The country profile will serve a basis for the master plan. The work with stakeholder interviews was started in the framework of the project
Page 54 of 68
Progress Report I
events, working group meetings and field missions of the experts. 4: Technical Assistance to Regulatory Adjustments The provisions on legal change were included into the action plans. The work on this dimension is being coordinated with the National Secretary in the framework of the task force meetings.
5: Communication, The information on the task force meeting in Azerbaijan was published Information, online. Awareness The presentations of the stakeholders prepared for the Tbilisi meeting were also uploaded at the project webpage. The project team would like to stress the point that in Azerbaijan no additional effort of the experts on publicity of the project is needed, since the National Secretary carries out very active work with mass media in Azerbaijan and in the region to increase the public awareness on the EU technical assistance.
Bulgaria
1: Pilot projects 2: Concept of the regional networks of Logistics Centres and Implementation
The BSAP 1 Varna Ilyichevsk Kerch Poti/Batumi was updated and discussed with the stakeholders. The example of the inland waterways development on Danube (business case) was taken into consideration in elaboration of the initial version of the inland waterway report. The project team plans to involve experts active in inland waterway shipping and logistics on Danube for elaboration on business case study investigation for TRACECA inland waterways.
The TEN-T network of Bulgaria will be cross-referenced to the TRACECA LOGMOS master plan. The work on this dimension is carried out by Bulgaria in the framework of its membership in the EU.
5: Communication, The shipping line update was published. Information, The updated action plan will be available online. Awareness The constant dialogue with the stakeholders in Bulgaria is being carries out.
Progress Report I
Page 55 of 68
Georgia
1: Pilot projects
In order follow up the previous meetings, a Team Leader mission was conducted to Georgia in August 2011 to discuss further action of the beneficiary and of the LOGMOS project concerning the identified projects in Georgia (ILC at the TAM/Veli site, Block container train BCT - Poti-Baku) and a possible combination of these two projects for the TIF 2012. During meetings the representatives of the beneficiary stated that the land use issue for the TAM land plot would be officially solved within the near future as a result of negotiations with the Ministry of Defence. At the Tbilisi seminar in October 2011, the representatives of the Ministry of Defence confirmed their positive attitude towards development of the ILC at their site. A tender is being prepared to find an operator for the TAM/Veli site. The draft ToR would be transmitted to the LOGMOS project for review and comment. At the same time, negotiation went on with Georgian railways concerning their participation in the project. An IPO was planned (for a minor share of Georgian Railways) for the end 2011 beginning 2012. The LOGMOS project confirmed its readiness to provide a CBA for the Block train Poti Baku and handed over a data request of the project for this purpose. In August 2011, Georgian railways Transcontainer (GRTC) initially expressed its readiness to cooperate with the LOGMOS project. Furthermore, GRTC expressed no objection position to consider in principle a relocation of its container handling operation in to Veli, market demand provided. In October 2011, GRTC explained the company would look at other facilities as well, and no committed position towards Veli could be confirmed. Thus, no confirmation concerning an operational combination of the proposed BCT and the ILC at TAM/Veli could be achieved. In addition, the decision on TAM / Veli is pending, according to the beneficiary in Georgia, till the end of the year. The provision of the clear position on the development of TAM / Veli plot till the end of November is essential to enable the project team prepare supportive documents for the TRACECA investment forum 2012. The absence of such information till the end of November will jeopardize the presentation of the project of Georgia at TIF with support of the LOGMOS team.
The country profile was being elaborated, and will be discussed with the beneficiary in the next reporting period.
Page 56 of 68
Progress Report I
and Implementation 3: LOGMOS Master Plan 4: Technical Assistance to Regulatory Adjustments The country profile will serve as basis for analysis of Georgian position on TRACECA and role of this country in the regional logistics processes. This component is partly covered by the action plans. Further work on customs facilitation and transit issues facilitation has started. The cooperation with the Ukraine TEN-T project on PAEIS system has started to be considered for inclusion under LOGMOS research.
5: Communication, The regional seminar was organized in Tbilisi in October 2011. The Information, TRACECA Secretariat in Tbilisi has organized the event coverage in Awareness local media. The project team established the contacts to the mass media colleagues and provided information on the TRACECA webpage. The stakeholders of Georgia took part in the regional seminar. The work on organization on the railway working group meeting on the Black Sea has started with the representatives of Georgian railways. The EU Delegation was present at the event and updated information on the project has been provided.
Kazakhstan
1: Pilot projects
During a field mission of Key Experts the action plans and further steps were discussed with former TRACECA National Secretary, Mr. Bekmagambetov, TRACECA National Secretary, the Road Carriers Association, Globalink and the Forum of Entrepreneurs of Kazakhstan. The market demand for a well organised and scheduled ferry line service Aktau Baku was confirmed during the meetings, shortcomings were named to be overcome. Globalink pointed out that the Company was interested in investment into the Logistics centre in Aktau, and that, unfortunately, the Feasibility study prepared by the former TRACECA project did not provide any firm basis for investment decisions. A separate market analysis was, therefore, ordered from KPMG. During a mission to Astana project work, Action plans and further steps were discussed with the Ministry of Transport and the Kazakhstan Railways, the World Bank representatives and the Customs Brokers Association.
The subject is partly included in the action plans, and in the country profile under elaboration.
Progress Report I
Page 57 of 68
and Implementation 3: LOGMOS Master Plan 4: Technical Assistance to Regulatory Adjustments The country profile will serve a basis to present the role of Kazakhstan in the logistics processes and MOS Master plan for TRACECA. The subjects are considered in the action plans.
5: Communication, The country profiles will be published online. Information, The stakeholders of Kazakhstan took part in the Tbilisi regional Awareness seminar. The project team was invited to take part at TransEurasia transport exhibition in Astana in November 2011.
Kyrgyzstan
1: Pilot projects 2: Concept of the regional networks of Logistics Centres and Implementation 3: LOGMOS Master Plan 4: Technical Assistance to Regulatory Adjustments
The action plan was updated. The action plan was discussed during the Tbilisi meeting in October 2011. The points on the landlocked counties were presented at the Tbilisi workshop in October 2011. The work on the country profile has started. The work will start in the next reporting period. The subjects of the legal issues are included into the action plan and will be considered at the ad hoc basis during the project implementation.
5: Communication, The field mission to Kyrgyzstan is planned. Information, The stakeholders took part in the Tbilisi regional meeting. Awareness
Moldova
1: Pilot projects
A Team leader mission took place to Chisinau on in early August 2011 to discuss the action plan concerning the ILC at the Free economic zone of Marculesti and in preparation of the expert mission later in
Page 58 of 68
Progress Report I
August 2011. A mission of Short term experts of the project was conducted to Chisinau and Giurgiulesti to analyse the potential of river transport and river-sea transhipment in Moldova at the port of Giurgiulesti (including hinterland connections) late August 2011. The results are published in Progress report I. 2: Concept of the regional networks of Logistics Centres and Implementation The role of Moldova in the regional logistics process, including the contribution of its transport system in exploiting the inland waterways has been analysed. The country profile is under elaboration and will be published online during the next reporting period. 3: LOGMOS Master Plan 4: Technical Assistance to Regulatory Adjustments The work will start in the next reporting period. The basis provisions for the LOGMOS Master plan are included into the country profile of Moldova. The subjects of the legal issues are included into the action plans and will be considered at the ad hoc basis during the project implementation.
5: Communication, The country profile will be published online. The background Information, documents on the Moldova transport sector updates are being Awareness elaborated. The constant dialogue with the beneficiary in Moldova was carried out.
Romania
1: Pilot projects
The cross-references to the TEN-T networks of Romania are considered in elaboration of the action plans for the Black Sea. Currently, there are no direct pilot projects with participation of the Romanian stakeholders. The project team will identify practical interfaces for involvement of the Romanian transport sector stakeholders in the coming reporting periods.
2: Concept of the regional networks of Logistics Centres and Implementation 3: LOGMOS Master Plan
The cross-references to the TEN-T networks of Romania are considered in elaboration of the action plans for the Black Sea.
The work on this component for Romania will start in the next reporting period.
Progress Report I
Page 59 of 68
The work on this dimension is carried out by Romania in the framework of its membership in the EU.
5: Communication, The stakeholders from Romania will take part in all regional events Information, envisaged for TRACECA and the Black Sea region. Awareness The shipping line update has been published. A field mission to Romania is planned for the next reporting periods.
Tajikistan
1: Pilot projects
During a key expert mission to Tajikistan in September 2011, stakeholder meetings were organised at the MoT and with ABBAT (International road carriers of Tajikistan) and a site visit to Nijniy Pjandj and to Kolkhoz Abad took place. The beneficiary requested the consultant to consider the new planned Railway connection to Kolkhoz Abad Nijnij Pjandj (presented at the Tbilisi meeting) in the LOGMOS Master plan and for possible consideration at the TRACECA investment forum. The project team started evaluation on aluminium logistics flows (alumina and aluminium products) related to Tajikistans Aluminium Company TALCO. This work will be coordinated with IDEA project in relation to the trade data.
The stakeholders informed that EvraZES under its common transport space initiative (http://www.evrazes.com/docs/view/68) has developed and adopted a strategy baseline on international logistics centre network of EvraZES (available in Russian at http://www.evrazes.com/docs/view/434) The document has been analysed by the project team. The paper is of general manner and declarative character. The document provisions, since they are adopted by some TRACECA national governments will be considered in the LOGMOS concept as well.
The work on country profile has started. The work on the master plan will be further advanced in the next reporting period. The issues will be considered on the ad hoc basis within the action plan working groups.
5: Communication, The presentations of the ILC in Nijniy Pjandj and Kolkhoz Abad Information, Nijniy Pjandj railway were delivered at Tbilisi meeting.
Page 60 of 68
Progress Report I
Awareness
Turkmenistan
1: Pilot projects
Preparatory work for a TRACECA technical meeting in Turkmenistan with participation of representatives from Azerbaijan and Turkey was continued in August, confirmation has been received for the participation in the annual meeting of Caspian ports to be held 22-24 September 2011 in Turkmenbashi. During a meeting of the Team leader and TRACECA Secretary General with the Turkmen Ambassador to Azerbaijan the LOGMOS project has been introduced, support for the project activities connected to Turkmenistan was promised by the Ambassador. The project team and representatives from the Turkish Maritime administration and representatives from UND (Turkish Truckers Association) and UTIKAD (Turkish Freight Forwarders Association) took an active part in the 3rd annual meeting of Caspian ports in September 2011 in Turkmenbashi. During a separate meeting with the Maritime and River transport Administration of Turkmenistan, the Action plans for the development of the rail and Ro-Ro ferry operations Baku - Turkmenbashi were discussed and the market demand stressed by the Turkish representatives. The Turkmen side documented a high interest in an active participation in TRACECA activities.
2: Concept of the regional networks of Logistics Centres and Implementation 3: LOGMOS Master Plan 4: Technical Assistance to Regulatory Adjustments
The work will start in the next reporting period. The provisions of regional importance are considered in the action plans.
5: Communication, The work of project in Turkmenistan is complicated by the requirement Information, of official registration with Government structures. The registration is Awareness currently underway. Due to recent change in the transport sector management, the work has be reactivated with the support of the local experts. Ad hoc missions to Turkmenistan will be required.
Progress Report I
Page 61 of 68
Turkey
1: Pilot projects
The constant dialogue with the representatives of the Turkish logistics and transport industry was organized. The stakeholders from Turkey plan an active part in the development of the LOGMOS action plans both for the Black Sea and for the Caspian Sea areas. The development of the logistics centres network in Turkey will be taken into consideration in the concept development. The experience of Turkey with special industrial zones, and logistics centres linked to such hinterland will be taken into account as well. The role of Turkish transport sector and practical experience of the Turkish logistics industry in TRACECA will be highlighted in the master plan. Turkey implements extensive work on this subject under IPA initiatives.
2: Concept of the regional networks of Logistics Centres and Implementation 3: LOGMOS Master Plan 4: Technical Assistance to Regulatory Adjustments
5: Communication, Representatives from Turkey took part in meetings in Turkmenistan in Information, September 2011 to discuss the perspectives of Ro-Ro ferry lines Awareness Turkmenbashi Baku. The representatives of Turkey took part at the Tbilisi regional seminar. The study tour to Turkey is put onto the project agenda in 2012-2013.
Ukraine
1: Pilot projects
The project team organized regular meetings took place with National Secretary of TRACECA, concerning the issues arising from the Action plans for Ukraine. During key expert missions to Odessa in August and October 2011 further steps concerning the ILC at Euroterminal Odessa were discussed with Euroterminal and the Odessa Sea port. The Euroterminal has opened the customs terminal at its territory in October 2011. This fact provides for better logistics capabilities and services of the site. Issues concerning the Viking train and customs reform in Ukraine
Page 62 of 68
Progress Report I
were discussed with representatives of PLASKE. A meeting of the inter-ministerial working group in Ukraine was conducted in late September 2011 with representatives of the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine, representatives of the Customs service, Ukrainian railways and representatives of the private sector. During the meeting the LOGMOS issues in Ukraine (action plans on BSAP 1, Borispol ILC, Euroterminal ILC) were discussed at the Ministry of Infrastructure with the concerned stakeholders to monitor the progress since the regional meeting in July 2011. The detailed conclusions of the meeting were prepared and distributed to the EC and the participants. The action plans were updated based on the recommendations of the working group. 2: Concept of the regional networks of Logistics Centres and Implementation 3: LOGMOS Master Plan The country profile of Ukraine has been prepared and will be distributed for the approval of the beneficiary in November 2011.
A mission of Short term experts of the project to analyse the potential of river transport in Ukraine was conducted 29-31 August 2011 to Dnepropetrovsk, Zaporozhe and Kherson. The subjects are included into the action plans. The subject related to the railway regulatory issues in the Black Sea are is planned to be discussed within a working group of the railways of Ukraine, Georgia and Armenia indicatively planned for December 2011.
5: Communication, The key experts took part in the 5th Black Sea container summit in Information, Odessa in September 2011 and had intensive talks with stakeholders Awareness in the Black Sea region, including the new port management of the port of Poti, customs officials of Ukraine, shipping lines and container terminals. During the meeting several participants informed about a forthcoming BSEC meeting in Novorossiysk in November 2011 concerning a Motorways of the Sea master-plan for the Black Sea. The Team Leader presented the project at the First meeting of the Inter-ministerial Working Group on introduction of the project One Window Local Solution under patronage of the State Customs Authority of Ukraine in mid-October 2011, and at the 14th International Conference on transport and logistics: Transit potential of Ukraine. Effective infrastructure and logistics on transport in South-East European countries
Uzbekistan
Progress Report I
Page 63 of 68
1: Pilot projects 2: Concept of the regional networks of Logistics Centres and Implementation 3: LOGMOS Master Plan 4: Technical Assistance to Regulatory Adjustments
The action plan was updated. The action plan was discussed during the Tbilisi meeting in October 2011. The points on the landlocked counties were presented at the Tbilisi workshop in October 2011. The work on the country profile has started. The work will start in the next reporting period. The subjects of the legal issues are included into the action plans and will be considered at the ad hoc basis during the project implementation.
5: Communication, The field mission to Uzbekistan is planned for the next reporting Information, period. Awareness The stakeholders took part at the Tbilisi meeting.
Page 64 of 68
Progress Report I
The next reporting period encompasses the six month from November 2011 till April 2012. The information on project activities within this period is already presented in the chapter 3 of the present report. The current chapter provides the summary of the dedicated activities. PI: Project inception This phase included activity a) Project Mobilisation and b) Adjustment of the work plan. Both activities are completed, as all performance indicators have been achieved in the inception phase. 1A: Maritime dimension of MoS projects The work on this component will continue and will be delivered as per tasks specified below. Activities of the project will be coordinated with the PS. a) Training activities and study tours The capacity building activities will continue within the framework of the task forces. Klaipeda / Slawkow or Turkey / Izmir area, as well as Bologna - Trieste / Italia were selected as possible locations of the logistics centres. The June 2012 and June 2013 were selected as indicative dates for the study tours. These dates will be communicated to the PS for inclusion into the TRACECA calendar. b) Identification, approach and bringing together of EU stakeholders and customers This work will continue in the working groups and task forces. c) Communication and dissemination activities to strengthen awareness of the MoS concept through regional support The webpage will be continuously updated. The presentations will be delivered. The ENPI coverage work will be continued. Newsletters will be submitted to the PS every 3 months. d) Assessment and recommendations on feasibility of previously unselected and new pilot projects The collection of project proposals will continue. The beneficiaries were informed during Tbilisi meeting on submission of their project proposals. The preparation of the MCA will be progressing and draft proposals will be discussed with the countries. The monitoring of the pilot projects will be organised. e) Technical assistance aimed at mobilisation of different sources of financing for the implementation of MoS projects The meetings with investors, private sector stakeholders will continue in the framework of the field missions. Coordination with IFIs will progress on most promising projects that have already generated the interest of IFIs. The beneficiary countries will be assisted in preparation of the logistics and MoS projects for the investment forum where appropriate in cooperation with the IDEA project. f) Monitoring and reporting on the implementation of the MoS pilot projects This activity will continue within the working groups and meetings of task forces. The reporting on progress monitoring will be organised on the action plan basis, 1B: Hinterland dimension of MoS projects a) Set up of working groups and task forces and technical assistance for improving efficiency (including simplification of bordercrossing procedures) and attractiveness of commercial conditions
Progress Report I
Page 65 of 68
The activity will continue and the TRACECA regional technical working group will meet preliminarily in February - March 2012 (adjacent to the investment forum 2012), the dates will be coordinated with the TRACECA event calendar. The training needs will be identified and a regional training delivered to participants of the task forces. The results of the Central Asia, Caucasus and Caspian working group and the Black Sea working group will be followed up. The work will be coordinated with the PS. b) Development and implementation of a restricted number of case studies on connections between ports and logistical zones The preparatory work will start. The initial assessment of the countries proposals at the macro level will be organised. The work will be coordinated with the PS. 2A: Concept of the regional networks of Logistics Centres a) Setup of bilateral and regional working groups for promoting logistics processes and network possibilities This work will continue, and the crossreference of the ILC pilot projects with MoS will be followed up to provide for synergy. The work will be coordinated with the PS. The working group meeting of the railways of Georgia, Armenia and Ukraine on railway technical matters is planned for mid-December 2011. The project team will approach the stakeholders in coordination with National Secretaries to organise the event. b) Identification of the core networks between ports and logistics hubs This work will continue within individual action plans and country profiles and will be coordinated with the PS. c) Development of recommendations and guidelines for the TRACECA network of logistics centres The analysis will be implemented based on the collected information and status of the action plans. The work will be coordinated with the PS. d) Organisation of study tours and training The dates of the study tours are identified for June 2012 and June 2013. The information will be communicated to the PS for inclusion into the TRACECA calendar. 2B: Logistics Centres projects implementation These activities in focus of the project team during the second year of implementation. Some preliminary work as data collection and updates of the country profiles is relevant for the scope of the next reporting phase. a) Identification of interfaces to be developed to promote the network of logistics centres b) Identification and promotion of synergies between identified logistics centres c) Technical assistance related to establishment of network modalities d) Followup of feasibility studies and promotion of identified sites, raising awareness and enhancing interest e) Establishment of a dialogue and cooperation between the promoters and developers of the logistics centres 3: LOGMOS Master Plan The preparatory work will start following the provisions of the updated guidelines of the TEN-T policy review. The coordination work with IDEA project revealed that the TRACECA database will not be updated in the near future, since the IDEA team has been charged with different priorities as far
Page 66 of 68
Progress Report I
as the database is concerned. The IDEA team has communicated to the LOGMOS experts the source files of data at UNCOMTRADA databank that was originally used for the TRACECA database. This therefore will be laid as a basis for LOGMOS team computations in the country profiles and later in the LOGMOS master plan. Such a decision was taken by the project team in order not to jeopardise the implementation of this particular task. In fact, this task constitutes an additional activity that has not been listed in the project ToR. The needed data was assumed by the LOGMOS project team to be readily available since IDEA project contains an extensive component on the database and transport model development. The resources spent on this task will be shifted from other tasks of the project. The exact records will be done and communicated to the European Commission for inclusion into the contract addendum. a) Developing recommendations and guidelines for LOGMOS The initial investigations will start. The basic methodology will be discussed with the beneficiaries and EC. b) Two/three case studies to be selected and developed as pilot projects, small working groups to be set up to for addressing bottlenecks / defining required technical assistance The list of candidate projects will be selected and evaluated using the MCA with an objective to define projects that shall be evaluated in the framework of case studies. c) Support and capacity building for attracting funding The initial activities will start following the task force approach 4: Technical Assistance to Regulatory Adjustments This component lies within the scope of the next reporting phase, addressed via pilot projects. The work will be coordinated with the PS. a) Case study related assessment of maritime and intermodal legislation and environmental measures The recommendations will be provided on an action plan / working group basis. Various dedicated aspects will be finalised. The recommended measures will be followed up. The work on PAEIS will be considered for inclusion as a follow up task into the LOGMOS activities. The coordination with TEN-T Ukraine project in this respect will be continued. b) Organization of trainings, seminars, working groups to identify changes needed Regular working groups on a country and bilateral basis will be organised. A regional technical working group for TRACECA is scheduled for MarchApril 2012. The work will be coordinated with the PS. c) Development of a monitoring mechanism for regulatory adjustments The activities will continue on a case by case basis 5: Communication, Information, Awareness a) Communication, dissemination and awareness plan / media strategy and implementation Activities will be implemented in accordance with the TOR as per communication plan presented in Annex 3 of the inception report. Cooperation with ENPI Info Centre will continue on an ad hoc basis b) Web portal based on TRACECA site and team room for knowledge base on MoS and Logistics and online library The project webpage will be updated. The work will be coordinated with the PS.
Progress Report I
Page 67 of 68
The sections on the action plans and country profiles will be established. c) Cooperation platform meetings of project owners will be organised in accordance with the communication plan. d) Final project dissemination This activity is relevant for the final reporting period. e) Study tours on MoS and Logistics The preparatory work will start. f) Dedicated training workshops / capacity building measure (ad hoc basis) Dedicated training programme for the task forces will be drafted. The trainings will be organised on the ad hoc basis in the working groups g) TRACECA investment forums support in preparation and technical docs (TIF) Activities for the preparation of projects for the investment forum will continue. The work on the Armenian project presentation will be finalised. In case the beneficiary in Georgia provides a clear decision on TAM / Veli site, including a commitment concerning the future operational use of the site for the block container train, the potential for combination of the TAM / Veli ILC project and the block container train project will be investigated by LOGMOS team in view of presentation of the extended project at the TRACECA investment forum 2012. .
Page 68 of 68
Progress Report I
This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication is the sole responsibility of Egis International / Dornier Consulting and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.
Progress Report I
Page 69 of 68
Progress Report I
Page 1 of XX
Inception Report
Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2
October 2011
LOGFRAME
Intervention Logic Overall Objectives This project has been conceived as the follow-up of three previous TRACECA EU Funded Projects, namely: Motorways of the Sea (MoS) for Black Sea and Caspian Sea International Logistical Centres for Western NIS and Caucasus International Logistical Centres for Central Asia The overall objective of the current project is to contribute to the long-term sustainable development of the logistics infrastructure and multimodal transport along the TRACECA corridor. The assignment will enhance the development and implementation of coherent strategies for establishment of intermodal integrated transport and logistics chains underpinned by MoS. Objectively Verifiable Indicators Increased volumes of good on the TRACECA corridor in export, import and transit Reduction of transport costs from/to/via the TRACECA countries in export/import/transit operations Increased share of containerisation of goods Larger share of multimodal operations in transport transactions Concrete projects on improvement of the logistics capabilities / motorways of the sea connection on the regional and country level in TRACECA corridor Agreed master plan on LOGMOS Sources of Verification National statistics TRACECA database TRACECA investment forum publications ENPI Alerts Statistics and reports of the international organisations State and regional programmes and action plans Reports of the international organisations Assumptions NA at the overall objective level as per logframe approach
Progress Report I
Annex 1 - Logframe
Page 1 of 16
Intervention Logic Project Purpose By assessing the network from a regional perspective the purpose of the assignment will ensure that infrastructure and soft projects planned or implemented contribute to the continuity of TRACECA. The focal points entail :
Objectively Verifiable Indicators Two / three case studies implemented in TRACECA At least one mature LOGMOS project proposal for TRACECA annual TRACECA Investment Forum Higher level of investment / public granting / IFI financing or PPP in case of project realisation Inclusion of identified projects in the regional and national transport action plans, TRACECA action plans Improvement in the Logistics Performance Index of the WB and improvement in the TRAX indicator Agreed provisions and set of recommendations submitted to consideration of countries as per action plans
Sources of Verification National statistics and TRACECA database WB reports on Logistics Performance Index IFI funding reports and programming documents and action plans Publications of professional investment promoters and international organisations Official governmental publications Transport strategies and programming documents of TRACECA countries Project reports Documents of the Investment forum
Assumptions The partner governments continue their political commitment to regional cooperation; Stakeholders are ready to implement the measures required in terms of legal, technical and institutional reforms and allocate adequate resources; Increased ownership TRACECA Permanent Secretariat assists in coordination in beneficiary countries. Established order of legal initiative favours and considers recommendations of the project
Progress Report I
Annex 1 - Logframe
Page 2 of 16
Results Intervention Logic Result PI: Project inception Project Mobilisation and adjustment on the work plan
Objectively Verifiable Indicators Kick off meeting in Brussels Core project team completely mobilised Project office established Regional field missions took place in beneficiary countries Counterpart structures established Preparation, distribution and update of action plans on 5 MoS identified projects and further action plans for new projects National, bilateral and regional working groups and task forces on 5 MoS pilot projects are set up and work within the first year of the project National, bilateral and regional working groups and task forces set up for LOGMOS additional
Sources of Verification Project reports Project documentation Official communications of beneficiaries Registration letters
Assumptions Free access to necessary information and data Beneficiary facilitated the formalities of the project registration procedure and accreditation of the key experts Visa regimes favourable for international travel of experts in the region Counterpart staff Availability
Result 1: Implementation of the Motorways of the Sea concept through existing and future pilot projects and their hinterland dimension
Programming documents Documents of the round tables Case study documents Decisions and recommendations ENPI Alerts PS Internal Directives Project and PS WebPages Investment forum documents Updates of the TRACECA
Adherence of the stakeholders to the results achieved in the previous projects No change in the national policy affecting implementation of the MoS concepts Availability and willingness to cooperate at regional level Coherent management and absence of radical change in the transport sector supervision Favourable conditions in the transport sector management to
Progress Report I
Annex 1 - Logframe
Page 3 of 16
Objectively Verifiable Indicators projects At least one international stakeholder interested in development of pilot projects is identified Shipping line updates for Black Sea and Caspian Sea are issued every six months and included into the reports In 13 beneficiary countries assessment and recommendations on feasibility of previously unselected and new pilot projects is implemented Technical assistance aimed at mobilisation of different sources of financing for the implementation of MoS projects milestones to be defined as fit for each reporting period Set up of the key performance indicators for pilot projects and updates For events see Result 5: Communication, Visibility and
Assumptions facilitate the maturity of the proposed action Availability of counterpart staff
Progress Report I
Annex 1 - Logframe
Page 4 of 16
Sources of Verification
Assumptions
Result 2: Development and promotion of the concept of regional networks of Logistics Centres and intermodal interfaces
Preparation, distribution and update of action plans on 11 ILC identified projects and further action plans for additional projects National, bilateral and regional working groups or task forces on 11 ILC pilot projects as required for scope and status of individual project are set up and work within the first year of the project National, bilateral and regional working groups and task forces set up for LOGMOS additional projects (common indicator as in the Result 1) Core links between ports and logistics hubs are identified for all beneficiary countries
Concept documents Updated list of the priority projects Project reports ENPI Alerts PS Internal Directives PS and Project Webpage Investment forum documents Updates of the TRACECA strategies and Action Plans Official letters of the national counterparts MOUs, cooperation documents, letters of intent
Regional cooperation remains priority of countries Cooperative attitude of the transport sector stakeholders Endorsing advantages of the ILC network based on the EU 27 experience Availability of information Free access to facilities and data
Progress Report I
Annex 1 - Logframe
Page 5 of 16
Objectively Verifiable Indicators One action plan / guidelines for TRACECA network of the logistics centres Interface projects adjusted to promote the network of logistics centres are adapted 11 feasibility studies are followed up
Sources of Verification
Assumptions
MCA for LOGMOS project identification methodology agreed in the first year of implementation (also relevant to results 1 and 2) MCA runs on project proposals (also relevant to Results 1 and 2) 2 3 case studies on connections between ports and logistical zones (also relevant to Results 1 and 2) LOGMOS projects identified for Annual TRACECA Investment Forum (also relevant to Results 1 and 2) For events see Result 5:
TRACECA GIS traffic Database Government reports and decisions IGC Action Plans ENPI Alerts IFI reports Publications and information reports in mass media Study tour documents
Beneficiaries support and continuity in decision-making Favourable political and economic situation Willingness of stakeholders and authorities to cooperate under coherent, integrated logistics network solution and MoS concepts Relevant legislation and regulatory framework exists and is being developed Market conditions are attractive to the potential investors Access of project team to all countries within region, and to all project relevant areas (e.g. ports,
Progress Report I
Annex 1 - Logframe
Page 6 of 16
Sources of Verification
Assumptions border crossing points, airports, terminals, etc.) Approval process for promotion of project activities takes place in time Availability of the counterpart staff
Assessment of maritime and intermodal legislation and environment relevant to action plans Monitoring mechanism on regulatory adjustments Tailored training on ad hoc basis for pilot project stakeholders For events see Result 5: Communication, Visibility and Information Plan
Project reports Reports of the PS Documents of the PS Working Groups National regulatory agenda and publications
Legal and regulatory initiative of respective bodies Procedures favourable for implementation of the recommendations Regulatory agenda remains priority in countries Interest groups are not pursuing polar interests on the national and regional level Transparent process of the regulations Access to data and information is facilitated and provided PS is capable to pursue the
Progress Report I
Annex 1 - Logframe
Page 7 of 16
Sources of Verification
Assumptions recommendations of the projects Availability of the counterpart staff Institutional environment is favourable to reforms
Communication, dissemination and awareness plan / media strategy framework prepared in the inception period Web portal based on TRACECA site launched in the inception phase and updated minimum once a month Dissemination materials prepared every six months to all TRACECA beneficiaries Cooperation platform meetings / round tables of project owners in countries and bilateral held at least two every six months Five project regional meetings
Project reports Webpage ENPI Alerts and interviews Memos IFI documents PS communications
Progress Report I
Annex 1 - Logframe
Page 8 of 16
Objectively Verifiable Indicators for the countries of Black Sea and Central Asia Two study tours on MoS and Logistics for all TRACECA countries Four training measures (on ad hoc basis) in working groups Final project dissemination (1 event)
Sources of Verification
Assumptions
Progress Report I
Annex 1 - Logframe
Page 9 of 16
Intervention Logic / Activities PI: Project inception 1A: Maritime dimension of MoS projects 1B: Hinterland dimension of MoS projects 2A: Concept of the regional networks of Logistics Centres 2B: Logistics Centres projects implementation 3: LOGMOS Master Plan 4: Technical Assistance to Regulatory Adjustments 5: Communication, Information, Awareness
Objectively Verifiable Indicators Inputs: Key experts: Team leader: 660 man days Other key experts: 1320 man days Short-term experts: Senior Experts: 1000 MD Junior Experts: 1500 MD
Sources of Verification Costs Fee budget on key experts and short-term experts
Assumptions
Progress Report I
Annex 1 - Logframe
Page 10 of 16
Intervention Logic / Activities PI: Project inception a) Project Mobilisation b) Adjustment on the work plan Office established
Assumptions
Availability and participation of the counterpart staff to engage in meetings, project steering and working panels Timely response on Contractors requests by th e beneficiaries
1A: Maritime dimension of MoS projects a) Training activities and study tours b) Dialogue with a gathering of EU stakeholders and customers c) Communication and dissemination activities to strengthen the dissemination and awareness of the MoS concept through regional support d) Assessment and recommendations on feasibility of previously unselected and new pilot projects e) Technical assistance aimed at mobilisation of different sources of financing for the implementation of MoS projects f) Monitoring and reporting on the implementation of the MoS pilot projects
Availability and participation of the counterpart staff Favourable regional relations between countries Favourable investment environment in the countries Countries remain committed to the results of the previous projects Stakeholders are willing to cooperate under the format of a task force and remain active in implementation of the results Customs and other border authorities provide full support to implementation of the project Stakeholders are ready to capitalize on other project success stories to enable a quicker implementation of pilot projects and technical regulatory/normative reforms The beneficiaries pursue committed action in terms of necessary legal adjustments Free access to the project sites, availability of
Progress Report I
Annex 1 - Logframe
Page 11 of 16
Intervention Logic / Activities a) Set up of working groups and task forces and technical assistance for improving efficiency. b) Development and implementation of a restricted number of case studies on connections between ports and logistical zones
Assumptions information and documents IFIs strategies fit TRACECA objectives Country governmental policies allow for IFI funding and loans remain a possible instrument of public investments Interest of the international stakeholders in the region Strategies of the international shipping business include activities in the TRACECA region Investment forums are organised Countries remain committed to the results achieved in the previous projects Policies are favourable to implementation Customs sector is willing to cooperate and introduce change Recommendations of the project are actively followed up by the tasks forces and promoted by the participants of the action plans Countries relations are not undergoing regional tensions Stakeholders are promoting a regional approach International stakeholders are interested in
2A: Concept of a regional networks of Logistics Centres a) Set up of bilateral and regional working groups to promote logistics processes and network possibilities b) Identification of the core networks between ports and logistics hubs c) Development of recommendations and guidelines for TRACECA network of the logistics centres d) Study tours and training organisation 2B: Logistics Centres pro jects
Progress Report I
Annex 1 - Logframe
Page 12 of 16
Intervention Logic / Activities implementation a) Identification of interfaces to be adjusted to promote the network of logistics centres b) Identification and promotion of synergies between identified logistics centres c) Technical assistance related to establishment of network modalities d) Follow up of feasibility studies and promotion of identified sites, raising awareness and enhancing interest e) Establishment of a dialogue and cooperation between the promoters and developers of the logistics centres
Assumptions exploiting new business opportunities in the transport sector in TRACECA Decision making is consistent and appropriate Stakeholders at the national level realise the potential of the network and understand the winning results from participation
Progress Report I
Annex 1 - Logframe
Page 13 of 16
Intervention Logic / Activities 3: LOGMOS Master Plan a) Developing recommendations and guidelines for LOGMOS b) Two/three case studies to be selected and developed as pilot projects, small working groups to be set up to for addressing bottlenecks / defining required technical assistance c) Support and capacity building for attracting funding
Assumptions Countries are available for consultations Decision making process is favourable for the project environment Decision making is clear and consistent Counterpart staff remains committed and proactive in terms of implementation IFIs remain committed to improvement of the infrastructure in the region Availability of funds and programmes Country macroeconomic policies envisage external borrowing TRACECA investment forum is organised Ports are following the strategy of regional development and understand benefits from partnership
4: Technical Assistance to Regulatory Adjustments a) Case study related assessment of maritime and intermodal legislation and environment b) Organization of training, seminars, working groups to identify changes needed c) Development of a monitoring mechanism
Legal mechanisms allow for prompt changes and counterpart staff remains committed to the implementation of the recommendations PS counterpart is available for consultations International stakeholders remain interested in the TRACECA region
Progress Report I
Annex 1 - Logframe
Page 14 of 16
Assumptions
5: Communication, Information, Awareness a) Communication, dissemination and awareness plan / media strategy and implementation b) Cooperation with ENPI Info Centre c) Web portal based on TRACECA site and team room for knowledge base on MoS and Logistics and online library d) Cooperation platform meetings of project owners e) Final project dissemination f) Study tours on MoS and Logistics in Turkey and EU
Counterpart staff is available for consultations and participation at events Beneficiaries respond to contractors requests and suggestions Counterparts remain committed to implementation and assist in organisation of meetings in their respective countries
g) Dedicated training workshops / capacity building measure (ad hoc basis) h) TRACECA investment forums support in preparation and technical docs (TIF)
Progress Report I
Annex 1 - Logframe
Page 15 of 16
Assumptions
Governance structure: weakness of maritime authorities bodies in the administration structure, lack of adequately skilled experts and high staff turn-over, insufficient financial resources; lack of intra and inter-organisation coordination and communication. Inter-state tensions in the Caucasus region as well as in Central Asia might create difficulties in terms of regional coordination of transport flows, cross-border cooperation and trade facilitation. These risks should be minimised by the use of already functioning mechanisms for cooperation between the transport key stakeholders of the neighbouring states and the EU, e.g. cooperation with Eastern Partnership and Black Sea Synergies structure. A strong coordination between the EC, EU Delegations and the TRACECA Permanent Secretariat can as well increase the coordination, minimising the risk of de-commitments of certain countries.
Progress Report I
Annex 1 - Logframe
Page 16 of 16
October 2011
Mr Grigol Bolkvadze, Chief Commercial Officer Mr Zviad Chkhartishvili, Head of Marketing Department Batumi Sea Port (BSP) / Batumi International Container Terminal (BICT), Batumi
Mr Michel Gueriot Dr Georgi Doborjinidze Mr Ilia Tsivadze, Commercial Manager, BSP Ms Ketevan Oragvelidze, Marketing Manager, BICT Sarpi Georgian-Turkish Border Crossing Point , Sarpi Mr Vladimir Lazarashvili, Chief of Customs, Sarpi BCP
Progress Report I
Page 1 of 16
Institutions / Events / Persons Met August 2011 Armenia Ministry of Transport and Communication, Yerevan Mr Manuk Vardanyan, Minister of Transport and Communication Mr Gagik Grigoryan, Head of Foreign Relations Department and Programmes Department, Ministry of Transport and Communication, National Secretary of IGC TRACECA in Armenia Azerbaijan PS IGC TRACECA, Baku
LOGMOS Participants
Mr Andreas Schoen
Status quo of the Zvartnots International Airport/ILC Maritime flag issue Regional seminar of LOGMOS project in Tbilisi, October 2011 Future cooperation and further steps to be taken
Mr Andreas Schoen Mr Eduard Biriucov, Secretary General Embassy of Turkmenistan to Azerbaijan, Baku Mr Toyly Komekov, Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary Ambassador of Turkmenistan to Azerbaijan Mr Eduard Biriucov, Secretary General of the PS IGC TRACECA
Project status quo Preparation of the regional seminar of LOGMOS project in Tbilisi, October 2011 Coordination of LOGMOS project activities with the PS Visibility and accounting issues
Mr Andreas Schoen
Introduction and project overview Project activities in Turkmenistan Future cooperation and further steps to be taken
Progress Report I
Page 2 of 16
Institutions / Events / Persons Met Georgia Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia, Tbilisi
LOGMOS Participants
Ms Yulia Usatova Mrs Ketevan Salukvadze, Head of Transport Corridor Development Division, Transport Policy Department Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia, Tbilisi Mr David Giorgadze, Deputy Minister Mrs Ketevan Salukvadze, Head of Transport Corridor Development Division, Transport Policy Department Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia, Tbilisi Mr Vadim Turdzeladze, Consultant Mrs Ketevan Salukvadze, Head of Transport Corridor Development Division, Transport Policy Department NN, TAM Representatives Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia, Tbilisi Mrs Ia Janashia, Head of Transport Policy Mr Andreas Schoen Mr Andreas Schoen
Submission of the Inception Report Comments of the beneficiaries on the Action Plans Revitalization of TRACECA National Commission in Georgia Regional seminar of LOGMOS project in Tbilisi, October 2011 Future cooperation and further steps to be taken Introduction and project overview Preparation for the TIF 2012 Issues concerning the use of TAM territory for ILC and the Block Train Poti-Baku Future cooperation and further steps to be taken
Status quo of the ILC on the TAM territory and Block Train Poti-Baku Future cooperation and further steps to be taken
Mr Andreas Schoen
Introduction and project overview Preparation for the TIF 2012 Regional seminar of LOGMOS project in Tbilisi, October 2011
Progress Report I
Page 3 of 16
Institutions / Events / Persons Met Department Mrs Ketevan Salukvadze, Head of Transport Corridor Development Division, Transport Policy Department Kazakhstan TRACECA National Secretariat, Almaty Mr Murat Bekmagambetov, TRACECA National Secretary Globalink Logistics Group LLC, Almaty Mr Siddique Khan, President and CEO Mr Noel Garrino, General Manager of Road Transport Division KazATO Union of International Road Carriers of the RK (KazATO), Almaty Mr Alexandr Denissenko, Deputy Secretary General Headquarters of Forum of Kazakhstan Entrepreneurs, Almaty Mrs Munavara Paltasheva, COO Kazakhstan Association of Customs Brokers (KATB), Almaty Mr Gennady Shestakov, Chairman of Council
LOGMOS Participants
Issues Discussed / Investigated Status quo of the ILC on the TAM territory and Block Train Poti-Baku Future cooperation and further steps to be taken
Introduction and project overview Project status quo in Kazakhstan Future cooperation and further steps to be taken Introduction and project overview Overview and core activities of the company Status quo of Aktau ILC Future cooperation and further steps to be taken Project status quo in Kazakhstan Main freight flows Bottlenecks Participation in the regional seminar of LOGMOS project in Tbilisi, October 2011 Introduction and project overview Overview and core activities of Forum Constrains in the development of logistics in Kazakhstan Further steps to be taken Introduction and project overview Overview and core activities of KATB Bottlenecks Recommendations on improvement of operations in port
Mr Andreas Schoen Mr Michel Gueriot Mrs Elena Pissanaya Mr Andreas Schoen Mr Michel Gueriot Mrs Elena Pissanaya
Progress Report I
Page 4 of 16
Institutions / Events / Persons Met DAMU Logistics Group JSC, Almaty Mr Saken Toilybaev, CEO Mr Nikolai Kashirin, Chairman of the Board Mr Timur Ospanov, Adviser to the Chairman Moldova Free International Airport Marculesti (FIAM), Marculesti Mr Sergiu Ciobanu, General Manager Mr Boris Muntean, Deputy Director Giurgiulesti International Free Port (GIFP), Chisinau Mrs Ala Aydov, General Director Ministry of Transport and Road Infrastructure of the Republic of Moldova, Chisinau Mr Boris Gherasim, Deputy Minister of Transport and Road Infrastructure Mr Valeriu Ciubuc, Deputy Minister of Transport and Road Infrastructure Mr Andrei Cuculescu, Director of Road Development Department, TRACECA National Secretary Mrs Alina Diacenco, Deputy Head of National Railway Technical Department
Introduction and project overview Overview and core activities of the company Visit of DAMU Logistics ILC Exchange of information
Introduction and project overview Status quo of FIAM Development plans Future cooperation Future mission planning Development plans of GIFP Integration of Moldova into Viking train project Future cooperation and further steps to be taken
Introduction and project overview Marculesti International Logistics Centre status quo Seaborne and riverborne transportation through the Danube Giurgiulesti River Port Road/railway connections within country and Europe Logistics centre nearby Chisinau
Progress Report I
Page 5 of 16
Institutions / Events / Persons Met Mr Vigo Legzdins, Adviser to the Minister of Transport (EU Policy Advice Team) Mr Zaharia Igor, Head of Water Transport Department Ministry of Transport and Road Infrastructure of the Republic of Moldova, Chisinau Mr Zaharia Igor, Head of Water Transport Department Mr Petru Codreanu, Giurgiulesti Harbour Master Giurgiulesti International Free Port (GIFP), Giurgiulesti Mrs Ala Aydov, General Director Mr Vladimir Flocea, State Port Controller/Dispatcher Ukraine Euroterminal LLC, SE Odessa Commercial Sea Port,Odessa Mr Mikhail Vanenkov, Deputy Director on Commerce and Development Mr Vyacheslav Voronoi, Logistics and Commercial Department, Odessa Commercial Sea Port
LOGMOS Participants
Overview of LOGMOS activities in Moldova Overview of Giurgiulesti Port Port development plans Further steps to be taken
Overview of LOGMOS activities in Moldova Overview GIFP and Danube Logistics activities GIFP development plans Visit to Port
Mr Andreas Schoen
Status quo of customs terminal at Dry Port Euroterminal Shipping line vision for Ro-Ro project Development plans of Euroterminal Cooperation of Port of Odessa and Euroterminal Future cooperation and further steps to be taken
Progress Report I
Page 6 of 16
LOGMOS Participants
Mr Andrei Tchaiko, General Director Site visits to Kherson Ports, Kherson Mr Viktor Bublykov, Government of Kherson Region, Member and Adviser in Transport Policy Mr Vyacheslav Sokolov, Kherson Deputy Harbour Master, State Port Administration Mr Ivan Zavizion, Director, Kherson River Port (Part of Ukrrichflot) Mr Aleksey Antoshkin, Deputy Director, Kherson River Port (Part of Ukrrichflot) Mr Vasiliy Donets, Director, Kherson Shipyard (Part of Ukrrichflot) Mr Valeriy Zhurov, Deputy of Director General on Investments Policy and Development, SE Kherson Commercial Sea Port
Issues Discussed / Investigated PLASKE initiatives in customs and legal issues Extension of the operation of the train Viking in Georgia, Azerbaijan and Moldova Status of Working Group in Ukraine Future cooperation and further steps to be taken Introduction and project overview Overview of the company Development of river traffic and river ports Bottlenecks Prospects or development of container traffic on inland waterways Permits for visiting river ports on the Dnieper
Introduction and project overview Port hub in Kherson Presentation of Kherson River Port (Ukrrichflot) and site visit Presentation of Kherson Shipyard (Ukrrichflot) and site visit Presentation of Kherson Commercial State Sea Port and site visit Prospects for development of container direction
Progress Report I
Page 7 of 16
Institutions / Events / Persons Met Zaporozhe River Port Administration, Zaporozhe Mr Alexander Zyskind, General Manager Mr Sergey Agafonov, Port Operations Manager Mr Igor Kamenev, Head of Commercial Department Mr Dmitry Brusnitsin, Deputy Head of Commercial Department Mr Victor Bondar, Chief Technologist Dnepropetrovsk River Port Administration, CSAV NORASIA Representative Office in Dnepropetrovsk, Dnepropetrovsk Mr Vadim Shpak, Deputy Commercial Director (Ukrrichflot), Dnepropetrovsk River Port Mr Alexander Detsyura, CSAV NORASIA Representative in Dnepropetrovsk Mrs Anastasyia Zadorozhnaya, Representative of Freight Forwarder with CSAV NORASIA September 2011 Armenia National Secretariat of IGC TRACECA in Armenia Mr Gagik Grigoryan, Head of Foreign Relations Department and Programmes Department, Ministry of Transport and Communication, National Secretary of IGC TRACECA in Armenia
LOGMOS Participants
Introduction and project overview Overview of the Port Site visit Prospects for development of container direction
Introduction and project overview Overview of the Port CSAV NORASIA operations in Dnepropetrovsk Site visit on areas dedicated to container business
Project status quo Presentation of findings and approach of the team Technical constrains of the access road to the ILC at Zvartnots Site visit Future cooperation and further steps to be taken
Progress Report I
Page 8 of 16
Institutions / Events / Persons Met Azerbaijan TRACECA National Secretary, Baku Mr Akif Mustafayev, TRACECA National Secretary PS IGC TRACECA, Baku Mr Akif Mustafayev, TRACECA National Secretary Mr Vahid Aliyev, First Deputy Director, Baku International Sea Commercial Port Mr Elnur Kazimli, Head of Foreign Relations Department, MoT Mr Samed Garalov, Head of Main Department of Customs Control, State Customs Committee Mr Teymur Mammadov, Head of Operations and Transport Processes Department, ADDY Mr Rafail Mirgulamov, Deputy Head of Commercial Department, Baku International Sea Commercial Port Mr Nazim Mammadov, Representative of CASPAR Mr Melikov Husameddin, Deputy Head of Tariff and Transport Service Department, ADDY Mrs Yuliana Stasiuc, Expert, PS IGC TRACECA CASPAR, Baku Capt. Mukhtar Akhundov, Vice-President Mr Nazim Mamedov, Expert in Maritime Operations, PS IGC TRACECA
LOGMOS Participants
Set-up of the LOGMOS Azerbaijan Working Group Status quo of the of the new port at Alyat Future cooperation and further steps to be taken
Introduction and project overview Pilot-projects and future developments BCT agreement issue Modernization of Customs Committee Future cooperation and further steps to be taken
Introduction and project overview Overview and core activities of the company Future development plans Participation of CASPAR in the regional seminar of LOGMOS project in Tbilisi, October 2011
Progress Report I
Page 9 of 16
Institutions / Events / Persons Met NN, Chief of Ferries Operations PS IGC TRACECA, Baku
LOGMOS Participants
Issues Discussed / Investigated PR activities of LOGMOS project Facilitation in participation of the Turkmenistan delegation in the regional seminar of LOGMOS project in Tbilisi, October 2011 Website hosting issues PS participation in the regional seminar of LOGMOS project in Tbilisi, October 2011 Action plans implementation approach Regional seminar of LOGMOS project in Tbilisi, October 2011: participants and presentations of the Azerbaijani delegation Country profiles: Azerbaijan Action plans of the pilot-projects Participation of the LOGMOS KE II at the working group on combined transport Coordination of the further steps to be taken LOGMOS Webpage training
Ms Yulia Usatova Mrs Fatima Atakishyeva Mr Eduard Biriucov, Secretary General TRACECA National Secretary, Baku Mr Akif Mustafayev, TRACECA National Secretary PS IGC TRACECA, Baku Mr Anar Ismayil, PS Land Transport Expert PS IGC TRACECA, Baku Mr Anar Mammedov, Web Administrator PS IGC TRACECA Georgia Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia, Tbilisi Dr Georgi Doborjinidze Mrs Ia Janashia, Head of Transport Policy Department Ms Yulia Usatova Mrs Fatima Atakishyeva Ms Yulia Usatova Mrs Fatima Atakishyeva Ms Yulia Usatova Mrs Fatima Atakishyeva
Update of the project activities in Georgia CBA of Georgian Block Train Future cooperation and further steps to be taken
Progress Report I
Page 10 of 16
Institutions / Events / Persons Met Kazakhstan Ministry of Transport and Communications of Kazakhstan, Astana Mr Rustan Jenalinov, Director of Strategic Planning and Logistics Department Mr Bolat Jansugurov, Director of Road and Water Transport Department (DAVT) Mr Marat Saduov, Adviser to the Minister Mr Serik Bashimov, Head of Transit Policy Administration Mr Janat Kurmankulov, Key Expert, Strategic Planning Department Mr Bakhtiar Omarov, Expert Water Transport Administration (DAVT) Mr Alibek Sultanov, Expert, International Organizations Administration (DMS) Mr Gennadi Yan, Deputy Head of Legal Department, Aktau International Sea Commercial Port (AISCP) World Bank Country Office, Astana Mrs Aliya Mukay, Operations Officer, Infrastructure Sustainable Development Department JSC National Company Kazakhstan Temir Zholy (KTZ), Astana Mr Rustam Sadykov, Head of International
LOGMOS Participants
Introduction and project overview Pilot-projects and future developments Action plans implementation approach Exchange of information
Introduction and project overview WB involvement in financing of current infrastructure projects Introduction and project overview Development plans of KTZ in the field of national logistics Participation of KTZ in the regional seminar of LOGMOS project in Tbilisi, October 2011
Progress Report I
Page 11 of 16
Institutions / Events / Persons Met Cooperation Department, KTZ Mr Erkhat Iskaliev, Vice-President, KTZ Mr Oralkhan Kulakov, President, JSC National Centre of Transport Logistics Developments, KTZ Mr Vitaly Ausharipov, Director, Infrastructural and Innovative Projects, KTZ Delegation of the European Union to the Republic of Kazakhstan, Astana Mr Mushtaq Hussain, Head of Trade Section Mrs Rasa Jautakaite, Transport and Customs Expert Ms Gulnara Dusupova, Project Manager Tajikistan TRACECA National Commission in Tajikistan, Ministry of Transport, Dushanbe Mr Kurbon Saidov, Head of the Road Transport and Transport Safety Department of the Land Transport Unit of the Ministry of Transport Mr Feruz Makhmudov, Chief Expert of the International Economic Relations Department of the Ministry of Transport Mr Rustam Ishankhodjaev, Chief Expert of the Railway Transport Department Mr Solih Muminov, TRACECA National Secretary TRACECA National Commission in Tajikistan, Ministry of Transport, Dushanbe
LOGMOS Participants
Introduction and project overview Project activities in Kazakhstan Action plans implementation approach Future cooperation and further steps to be taken
Ms Yulia Usatova
Introduction and project overview Railway construction project Kolhozabad-Nijniy Pjandj Regional seminar of LOGMOS project in Tbilisi, October 2011:coordination of the participation in the event Status quo of LC in Nijniy Pjandj Trends in transportation in Tajikistan Take away materials on aluminium trade
Ms Yulia Usatova
Progress Report I
Page 12 of 16
Institutions / Events / Persons Met Mr Eshonov Boimurod, First Vice-President, Association of the International Automobile Carriers of the Republic of Tajikistan (ABBAT) Mr Solih Muminov, TRACECA National Secretary Site visit to Nijnij Pjandj ILC Mr Solih Muminov, TRACECA National Secretary Mr Nimatullo Sohibov, State Unitary Enterprise Research, Design and Survey Institute, Ministry of Transport Mr Kurbon Saidov, Head of the Road Transport and Transport Safety Department of the Land Transport Unit of the Ministry of Transport Turkmenistan Europa House in Turkmenistan, Ashkhabad Mr Theo Hensels, Coordinator Mrs Valeriya Danilchenko, Deputy Coordinator Turkmenbashi International Sea Commercial Port (TISCP), State Service of Maritime and River Transportation of Turkmenistan (SSMRTT having status of Ministry),Turkmenbashi His Excellency Meylis Mutdikov, Chairman of the SSMRTT with Rank of Minister Mr Yazgeldy Nazarov, Chairman of TISCP
LOGMOS Participants
Issues Discussed / Investigated Action plans implementation approach Position of the ABBAT in transport sphere of Tajikistan Statistics data
Ms Yulia Usatova
Status quo of Nijnij Pjandj FEZ Nijnij Pjandj Bottlenecks Finding on oil transhipment point Requests for information Follow up of the provisions of the feasibility study and the action plan for Nijnij Pjandj
Introduction of the parties Project overview Pilot-projects and future developments Exchange of information
Introduction of the parties Project overview TISCP development plans Railway issues Participation of TISCP representatives in the regional seminar of LOGMOS project in Tbilisi, October 2011 Throughput statistics Bottlenecks and recommendations
Progress Report I
Page 13 of 16
Institutions / Events / Persons Met TISCP Port Captain Mr Yakub Valiyev, Responsible for TRACECA Issues in Turkmenistan Mr Emre Dincer, Expert, Ministry of Transport and Communication, Turkey Mrs Hacer Uyuslar, Secretary General of UTIKAD, Turkey Mr Burak iga, Expert, UND, Turkey Ukraine Euroterminal LLC, Odessa Mr Mikhail Vanenkov, Deputy Director on Commerce and Development 5th Black Sea Container Summit, Odessa Information exchange on LOGMOS related issues Mr Jaanus Paas, President, EVR Cargo (Freight Transport Subsidiary Company), EESTI RAUDTEE (Estonian Railways) Capt. Heiko Poehlemann, Director Terminal Logistics, HPC Ukraine (Terminal Operator) Mr Rachid Bouda, Commercial Manager, HPC Ukraine (Terminal Operator) Mr Alexander Di Leonardo, Business Development Executive, Giurgiulesti International Free Port Mr Dorian Musteata, Business Development Executive, Giurgiulesti International Free Port (GIFP)
LOGMOS Participants
Mr Andreas Schoen
Status quo of railway link project Customs terminal issue Future cooperation and further steps to be taken
Updates on operations of Viking and Zubr Situation with cargo containerization in Ukraine Hinterland connections Giurgiulesti-Chisinau Bottlenecks at the crossing border with Moldova Development plans of GIFP Future cooperation
Progress Report I
Page 14 of 16
Institutions / Events / Persons Met Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine, Kiev Inter-ministerial working group in Ukraine Mr Kostantin Savchenko, Deputy Director of the Policy Development Infrastructure Transport and Tourism Department, Ministry of Infrastructure Mr Grygorii Legenkyi, TRACECA National Secretary Mr. Oleksandr Diachuk, Chief Specialist, Department for the Policy of Transport and Tourism Infrastructure Development, Ministry of Infrastructure Ms Yulia Migai, Head of the International Legal Affairs Division, Legal Support Department, Ministry of Infrastructure Mr Vladislav Plugin, Chief Specialist of the European Integration and International Organizations Division of International Relations Department, Ministry of Infrastructure Ms Vitaliya Suchina, Chief Specialist, Department of Economy and Finance, Ministry of Infrastructure Mr Alexandr Kondrat, Head of the Tariffs and Regulation of Natural Monopolies Division of the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine Mr Alexandr Zabara, Head of the Technical Policy, Audit Work and Regulation of Natural Monopolies Division of the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine Mr Yuriy Merkulov, First Deputy Head of the Main Commercial Department of Ukrzaliznytsya Mr Vakhtang Mikadze, Commercial Director, BFgroup
LOGMOS Participants
Introduction of the parties Project realisation in Ukraine: Introduction and Methodology Development of intermodal (rail-road) transport in Ukraine Simplification of Customs and other border crossing procedures Port Tariffs Improvement Participation of representatives of the working group in regional TRACECA working groups
Progress Report I
Page 15 of 16
Institutions / Events / Persons Met Mr Viktor Yatsenko, Consultant, Plaske JSC Mrs Olena Moshinska, Deputy Head of the Department, State Customs Service of Ukraine Mr Valeriy Lugovets, Head of the International Technical Assistance Division, State Customs Service of Ukraine
LOGMOS Participants
Progress Report I
Page 16 of 16
Logistics Processes and Motorwaysof of the Sea Logistics Processes and Motorways the Sea II II
in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan
Inception Report Annex 4 Progress Report I - Annex 3 Action Plans TRACECA Inland Waterways Dnepr Case Study October 2011 July 2011
Progress Report I
Annex 3
Page 1 of 30
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 2 3 GENERAL PERSPECTIVE FOR EXPLOTING TRACECA INLAND WATERWAYS ............................ 3 SECTOR ORGANISATION, CONDITION OF PORTS AND THE FLEET .............................................. 5 PROBLEMS OF SHIP OWNERS/AGENTS/FORWARDERS WORK ON THE RIVER DNEPR AND SEA PORTS OF UKRAINE ................................................................................................................... 10 3.1 TARIFF POLICY OF SEA AND RIVER PORTS AND OTHER ENTITIES OF WATER INFRASTRUCTURE OF UKRAINE.......................................................................................................................................... 10 3.2 PROCEDURES OF REGISTRATION OF ARRIVAL/DEPARTURE OF VESSELS IN THE POINTS OF STATE BORDER CROSSING. ......................................................................................................................... 10 3.3 NAVIGATION ON THE DNEPR .............................................................................................................. 12 3.4 MANDATORY PILOTAGE ..................................................................................................................... 13 4 5 CONTAINER TRAFFIC POTENTIAL ON THE DNEPR ....................................................................... 14 EXISTING EXAMPLES OF CONCEPTS AND BUSINESS SOLUTIONS: ........................................... 16 5.1 KHERSON ......................................................................................................................................... 16 5.1.1 JSC Kherson Shipyard ......................................................................................................... 16 5.1.2 State Enterprise Kherson Commercial Sea Port ............................................................. 17 5.1.3 Kherson Shipyard, Ukrrichflot .............................................................................................. 17 5.1.4 Kherson River Terminal (freight village) .............................................................................. 18 5.2 ZAPOROZHE ..................................................................................................................................... 20 5.2.1 JSC "Zaporozhe Automobile Building Plant" (JSC "ZAZ") ................................................... 20 5.2.2 Port of Zaporozhe, Ukrrichflot .............................................................................................. 20 5.3 DNEPROPETROVSK ........................................................................................................................... 21 5.3.1 Port of Dnepropetrovsk, Ukrrichflot ...................................................................................... 21 5.3.2 Aquarelle Ltd. Cargo Terminal ("TAVRIA LINE") ................................................................. 24 5.4 KIEV ................................................................................................................................................ 27 6 7 THE EU CONTRIBUTION ..................................................................................................................... 28 RECOMMENDATIONS.......................................................................................................................... 29
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Commodity Structure of the Potential Cargo Base for River Transport till Year 2015 ( 000 tonnes)14 Table 2: Regional Structure of the Potential Container Traffic via Dnepropetrovsk or Zaporozhe River Port (TEU) ..................................................................................................................................................... 15 Table 3: Regional Structure of the Potential Container Traffic via Kiev River Port (TEU) ............................. 15 Table 4: Speciality of Main Perspective Projects of the Terminal .................................................................. 19
Progress Report I
Annex 3
Page 1 of 30
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
FEZ IMTP KMTP Ro-Ro SCSU TRACECA Free Economic Zone Ilyichevsk Commercial Sea Port Kerch Commercial Sea Port Roll-on / Roll-off vessel State Customs Service of Ukraine Transport Corridor Europe Caucasus Asia
Page 2 of 30
Annex 3
Progress Report I
The international importance of the Ukrainian inland waterways is attributed to such rivers as the Danube (Reni, Izmail and Ust-Dunaisk) and the Dnepr. While the potential of Danube is well covered by various technical studies as part of the greater Danube shipping market, the Dnepr role remains not so well investigated. The purpose of this report is to highlight the role of the Dnepr in the transport system of Ukraine in particular and for TRACECA in general taking into account the European experience and current trends in the region. On national level, the Dnepr River may play an important role in connecting the central part of the country including Kiev to the Black Sea. For TRACECA the inland waterways of Ukraine constitute a major part of its inland waterway network in the former CIS countries. The Dnepr is international inland waterway of category E open for call to foreign vessels. The factor allows Dnepr to contribute to improved distribution of traffic flows from the Central and Northern Europe via the Black Sea ports, provided adequate logistics infrastructure is developed and navigation conditions are improved, Dnepr may play a role in logistics chains connected to Danube, Black and Mediterranean seas. With lines to the Sea of Azov, the Don and the Volga-Don channel vessels may reach ports on the Volga as well as on Caspian and Baltic seas. The European experience demonstrates the following factors that need to be considered in view of successful development of the inland waterway potential: Reduction in Landside Transportation Costs: container river ports located upriver close to the hinterland markets have potential of gaining market share from those ports located at the coast. This trend is a result of shippers intention to minimize landside transport costs by choo sing ports located farther inland. Targeting in Modal Market Shares: Despite inland waterways are an absolutely vital part of the multi-modal system, specifically in the case of bulk/liquid commodities, the global trend is that they losing market share versus the road mode. Therefore, the inland waterway system should seek its place in international container and domestic intermodal markets by providing the services required by the supply chains. Container-on-barge Services are Viable: Container-on-barge services in Europe have become an essential link in the transport of containers between hinterland markets and coastal ports. This solution could be also considered for TRACECA as well, of course bearing in mind existing technical barriers along its waterways. This is also connected to the overall containerisation situation in TRACECA. Since container-on-barge services require significant existing or potential volumes of international maritime containers moving between the requisite international gateway port and inland regional markets. Reliable Scheduled Services: The conditions provided by waterway system should be regular, rapid and reliable. These include proper navigation, container facilities and manageable distances. The experience in Europe shows that frequency and level of service is the most important factor to for competing with road transport. Mode Shift Policies and Mechanisms: It is the policy of the European Union to affect a modal shift from trucks to rail and waterways. For instance such traditionally external costs emissions and traffic congestion were converted into market based subsidies designed to take traffic off the highways and on to the waterways. Policies, incentives and subsidies would be become an
Progress Report I
Annex 3
Page 3 of 30
important tool for development of the integral logistics in TRACECA, including utilisation of the inland waterway potential in the supply chains. Marketing, Linkage with Shippers, Carriers and Ports: Marketing measures promoting certain segments of the network may be useful in targeted relationships with shippers seeking reliable mode options. Innovations and Technology: The use, reliability and efficiency of the waterway system are enhanced through application of modern technologies and innovations. Certainly these lessons learned cannot be put in place overnight, but they provide a vision for exploiting potential of the inland waterway system, and sketch the steps need to be taken.
Page 4 of 30
Annex 3
Progress Report I
The state, with the capacities of the State Sea and River Transport Policy Department of Ukraine is the main regulatory body for the river transport in Ukraine. In the following subchapters the regulatory issues are discussed in greater detail. The major players of the Dnepr transportation include: Ukrrechflot, the main river carrier and port owner offering large scope of transportation services on inland waterways of Ukraine. In addition, the company maintains shipbuilding and ship-repairing entities. Ukrvodshliakh, the state-owned Waterways Enterprise, is responsible for works on public inland waterways in order to provide appropriate conditions for the safe navigation. The state-owned River Ports Administration enterprise is in charge of the preservation and the proper maintenance of river hydraulic engineering works and the most efficient use of the state-owned property not included into authorised funds of river ports (hydraulic engineering structures, vessels and other property), as well as the provision of the relevant services. Dnepr's river ports are located on inland waterways (IWW) of international importance (Category E). They are located in places of the major concentration of Ukraine's industrial and agrarian potential. The total throughput of cargo terminals is 150 million tonnes per year. However, neither the size of the navigable waterway network, nor the potential of the ports can outweigh the small market share of the contemporary inland waterways traffic, which is noticeably low in comparison with any other mode of transport in Ukraine. The potential of the river transport remains unused mainly due to the following factors: Natural reasons: The Dnepr has a tortuous layout making a long distance of 850km from Kherson to Kiev, instead of 510km Odessa-Kiev by road and 713 km (tariff distance) by railway OdessaKiev. The river freezes in winter time which closes navigation between 50 and 100 days per year. Ice-breakers can extend the navigation period. Still this cannot guarantee uninterrupted service. Thus, river lines should be secured by /combined with on-land routes. The average distance between Dnepr estuary, in the West of Kherson to the closest deep see ports of Ilyichevsk, Odessa or Yuzhni is about 100km on the open sea. This long distance is considered to be a navigation barrier for purely river-going units calling deep see ports. Structural and technical reasons: Only few ports attract significant cargo flows. In general, the river transport handles less than 10% of potential traffic. Kherson lacks a suitable transhipment base for exchanging cargo between river units and sea-going vessels. The vessels have to pass five series of locks on the route from Kiev to the Black Sea. In addition, several low bridges require lifting operations to allow for passage of vessels. In most ports, the facilities are not fully utilised; the equipment and the infrastructure are obsolete or, often, decommissioned. River ports lack suitable handling equipment for containers (the only operational container facility is located in Dnepropetrovsk).
Progress Report I
Annex 3
Page 5 of 30
The efficiency of the utilisation of the available facilities is generally low. The maintenance requires large costs. It results in inflated operating expenses and high market prices. As a result, the internal river transport can hardly compete with other modes of transport. The major use of river ports and the river infrastructure includes the transportation of the low-value bulk cargo, such as sand, scrap metal, ore, metal, etc. This mode of transport suffers from lack of integration with the Ukrainian intermodal transportation network mainly attributed to its substantial inefficiency in transit cargo transportation and the inadequate infrastructure. Before the GEC of 2008, almost no new vessels were added to the existing obsolete fleet. Only JSSC Ukrrichflot implemented an operating fleet upgrade programme. This situation resulted in the reduction of the commercial fleet of river ports by half. The number of tug fleet units dropped by a factor of 1.5, and the service and auxiliary fleet decreased by a factor of 4. The lack of fleet replacement contributed to increase in its technical obsolescence. The average age of vessels exceeds 25 years. River ports are no longer properly equipped for bunkering. For most ports being situated in city centres, development or expansion is either difficult, or outright impossible. Proper maintenance is no longer ensured for dredging and for aids to navigation (buoys, lights, landmarks). Maintenance of locks and dams looks is also inadequate. This hampers navigation and constitutes a serious environmental hazard risk for population living along the river. For instance a possible failure of the 50m-high lock/dam in Zaporozhe may lead to environmental disaster and catastrophic consequences for the population. The technical and economic features, and the current operating capacity could allow the use of river ports as a part of the network of international transportation corridors in spite of the substantial physical wear and tear, and obsolescence of port facilities (hydraulic engineering structures, transport and warehousing equipment, transhipment equipment, etc.) in view of the economic benefits, energy savings and environmental advantages of river transport, as well as the range and volumes of traffic in the basin. However, it only applies to bulk cargo. Economic reasons: In the 90s the collapse of the USSR and the breakdown of traditional commercial relations with neighbouring countries entailed drastic economic consequences. Erratic privatization has led to the breach of common vision and cooperation between the regions of Ukraine and Ukrainian enterprises, which now belong to different owners, sometimes from foreign countries, with different priorities. All river ports on the Dnepr are privatised. Since 2008 Ukraine was hit by the worldwide crisis. The economic crisis continues to affect the inland water transportation negatively. The river fleet is mainly used for the transportation of the low-tariff cargo. The global trends did not change cargo patterns on the Dnepr. These mostly include local construction materials, such as sand, crushed rock, stones, slag, etc. The sand is the main cargo transported by fleets of the local ports. A large part of the Dnepr fleet was designed for bulk cargo, mainly sand and ore. Therefore most units are inappropriate for general cargo and containers. A major overhaul and upgrade of the out-of-date domestic fleet is not realistically feasible. For this reason, this cannot be regarded as a way out of the current situation. It substan-
Page 6 of 30
Annex 3
Progress Report I
tially hampers the competitiveness of inland waterways in comparison with other means of transport. The reduced volumes of traffic and low returns pushed most shipping companies toward suspending their commercial activities or moving them elsewhere. Still, private investment projects are being implemented due to the development of the agrarian sector. For instance, an investment project of Nibulon Agricultural limited liability company worth USD 470m is aimed at the revival of the navigation on Ukrainian rivers. It provides for the construction of 57 self-propelled and non-propelled vessels with the total deadweight of 200,000 tonnes, including 14 sea and river tug boats, as well as grain elevators (the 20th one will be commissioned on 1 November 2011), including 10 river elevators on the Dnepr, the Southern Bug, and other rivers. Nibulon are going to transport 2,000,000 tonnes of grain cargo per year on the Dnepr. Twenty-four non-propelled vessels and 4 tug boats have been built already and are operating successfully. Four river terminals were built on the Dnepr only with 3 further terminals being under construction. Recently, EBRD granted a loan of USD 50m to Nibulon for the construction of five grain elevators, including river grain elevators with the total capacity of about 300,000 tonnes of grain. These examples are very important, because it supports Ukraine's move towards specialised transportation in view of international trade, and confirms the competitiveness of the transportation through Ukraine's inland waterways. Status of the Regulatory Framework, the State Governance of the Sector, and Human Resources The distinction in legal nature of the sea and river transport in is a specific feature of Ukrainian legislation in the field of water transport. According to the Ukrainian law, the state regulates the river transportation and acts as a single regulator for the sector. The provisions of tariff and tax policy of the state are, therefore, essential for efficient operation of river ports and attraction of traffic. For instance as per Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 1548 of 25 December 1996 "On Setting out Powers of Executive Agencies and Executive Bodies of City Councils Regarding the Regulation of Prices (Tariffs)" the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine is to set the "charges for the use of river port hydraulic engineering structures and fees for specialised services provided at river ports (on terminals) of Ukraine (berthing, vessel, anchorage and administrative services) in co-ordination with the Ministry of Economy and the Ministry of Finance. The following still needs to be addressed to satisfy the needs of users of the transport system: introduction of a clear procedure for the conveyance of the state-owned property under a commercial management; the contracts concluded with regional departments of the State Property Fund of Ukraine for the operation of state-owned hydraulic engineering structures are outside of legal relations; the procedure of the contribution of investments into the construction and the major overhaul of hydraulic engineering structures is not regulated; putting in place mutual responsibility and feedback between companies in charge of the operation and the modification of inland waterways and the State Enterprise Ukrvodshliakh, which is responsible for the condition thereof (i.e., the responsibility in front of the State); the integration of the EU regulations in the field of the river transport. This sector will require specific legal regulation in the future, since the currently applicable legislation is either inefficient or missing;
Progress Report I
Annex 3
Page 7 of 30
Ukraine's regulatory framework in the field of the operation of the inland waterways is fragmented; it does not solve major issues in the field of operation and does not create conditions for the sustainable development of the river sector; it does not provide a link between the functioning of a river with the operation of coastal industrial areas and cities; the relations between state authorities and owners of private river ports and terminals, as well as tariffs and other charges are today governed by a number of opaque laws associated with considerable costs and opening broad opportunities for abuse. With limited administrative capacity the State Sea and River Transport Policy Department of Ukraine needs intuitional and financial support in order to ensure adequate functioning of the river transport. The privatisation of the river transport sector resulted in the fact that all oversight and strategic infrastructure maintenance duties of the state were transferred to the private sector. The following structural difficulties are currently observed in this respect private companies are financially unable to perform technical maintenance duties without endangering their own stability; they are unable to compete with the special anti-crisis railway tariffs offered by Uk rzaliznytsia; the continued evasion of duties by state authorities could eventually result in the irreversible degradation of inland waterways and the complete suspension of traffic. Specialised academic institutions Currently there are no specialised educational institutions in Ukraine for training of river fleet personnel. In Soviet Union and until a certain moment in Ukraine the Kiev River School trained the command personnel for river fleet. Today this school has been transformed into Kyiv River Transport Academy which trains seamen in conventional maritime professions. No command personnel is trained in Ukraine for self-propelled barges, tug-boats, pusher tugs, etc. (This means combined professions that are in demand specifically in river fleet - captain-mechanic, mate-mechanic, etc.). Requirements for combined profession diplomas for river vessel personnel are still in effect. Ukrainian river-related documents do not comply with international standards. Special attention is required for the analysis of problems of the maritime sector of Ukraine in container transport The volume of containers handled in transhipment through Ukrainian ports during the first eight months of this year amounted to a mere 4,000 TEU. This is the result after one year of amendments to the Transit law, which, theoretically, should have opened the door fully to transhipment in Ukrainian ports. The total transhipment volume in one year amounted to 5,388 TEU (28 vessels handled since the 22nd of September, 2010 The above amount represents about 0.8% of the total container volume through Ukrainian ports. In the explanatory memorandum to the Law prepared by the Ministry of Infrastructure, the prospect was to attract 400,000 TEU per year in transhipments, which would have brought an additional 50-60 million USD revenue The following reasons were identified as factors attributing to low traffic flows: 1. The Customs-clearance of containers in the ports remains tedious:
Page 8 of 30
Annex 3
Progress Report I
a. A container in transit mode passes the formalities in 6 to 12 hours, an import container takes from 18 to 22 hours or even up to several days (in the EU ports 30 minutes). The procedures include up to 12 control services, duplicating each other (in the EU - two or three). Veterinary Control requires the original veterinary certificates for the goods in the container not later than 24 hours before vessel call. Environmental Control insists on the radiological control for containers in transhipment mode which is not logical, since the goods are not imported into the territory of Ukraine. Regulatory documents that govern the work of these 12 services do not allow to distinguish the responsibility between them. b. 20-50% of the transit containers are scanned and inspected and until very recently it was the case for 100% of the import ones (in the EU 1 and 5% respectively). c. The actions of the controlling agencies in combating smuggling, paralyzes the work of the terminals do not take into account European experience in risk management system. In the working process the police, the Security Service of Ukraine, Tax Police, etc. can interfere at any time and stop the operation of a port, which occasionally happens. d. At the same time it is virtually impossible to establish the degree of responsibility of each of these services in the delays for the containers. 2. Transhipment is not possible for excise, dangerous goods because of the restrictions in the Transit law. 3. The total costs for the ship's call (disbursements) in Ukrainian ports is, on average, 30% higher than in other Black Sea ports. 4. The seasonal ice dues are charged in Ukraine, to ship-owners not to the cargo-owners. As a result, this year, CMA CGM, one of the main customers for the transhipment of containers at Odessa, transhipped containers at Constanta, in order to avoid paying this additional fare. 5. There are limitations to the so-called domestic (cabotage) transhipment, i.e. the transport of containers on board small tonnage ships between Ukrainian ports on the Dnepr River and the Azov and Black sea. The Port of Odessa, JSSC "Ukrrichflot", and the Customs developed and agreed upon the necessary technological steps to be followed and reported accordingly to the Ministry of Justice. Should this document be adopted, Ukraine could be looking forward to a real development of domestic (cabotage) transport of containers between the river and sea ports of Ukraine.
Progress Report I
Annex 3
Page 9 of 30
3 3.1
PROBLEMS OF SHIP OWNERS/AGENTS/FORWARDERS WORK ON THE RIVER DNEPR AND SEA PORTS OF UKRAINE Tariff policy of sea and river ports and other entities of water infrastructure of Ukraine.
There is not any kind of stimuli for Ukrainian-flag vessels (since January 2005 discounted port charges for Ukrainian flag have been cancelled, since April 2008 discounted port charges and service fees for foreign shipping vessels of companies that have the status of national transport operator have been cancelled). The status of "international carrier" has been introduced by the resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine for all vessels including Ukrainian since 2009. In respect to water transport, a vessel is considered an international carrier if it actually has cargo or passengers on board. In this case it is not subject to VAT for tonnage, canal and light port charges. At the same time a vessel which is heading in ballast for loading is not considered an international carrier and therefore is subject to VAT to the full extent. In accordance with all canons of maritime industry, the next voyage of a vessel starts immediately after unloading is completed, i.e. it often include an in-ballast passage to the place of loading (especially for vessels carrying bulk cargoes). In other words a lot of (Ukrainian) ship owners have to incur additional expenditures just because the commodities exported in bulk constitute the basis for the Ukrainian foreign trade. Ukrainian-flag vessels pay 20% VAT for all port charges and services, including agent fee which is taxed at zero rate for foreigners. Local port tariffs are artificially inflated under the pretence of ensuring navigation safety). In many ports: when vessels transferred from inner harbour as per the order of the port administration pull anchor heading to sea, they have to use the harbour tug for turning regardless of specific weather conditions, size and construction of the vessel (two screws, availability of steering nozzles or lateral thrusting propeller). Additional ship owner's expenditures, exclusive of extra charges for work at night time and during holidays, range from 100-300 USD; By resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine of 24/12/2003 No. 1989 "Issues of passage across the state border of automotive, water, railroad and air means of transport of carriers and cargo carried by them" the obligation to deliver members of commissions and representatives of controlling organizations to the place of control and back is put on the port administration or marine agent. In reality the expenditures for bringing the commissions on board are incurred solely by ship owners especially when the vessel is at anchorage. In summer such delivery costs for ship owners range from 50 to 150 USD and in ice conditions - up to 1500 USD. In violation of provisions of the "Convention on Facilitation of International Maritime Traffic of 1965", which was ratified by Ukraine in 1993 and which envisages free of charge work of state services, unreasonably high tariffs are established in the port for the "services" of the Inspection State Inspectorate of the Port on registration of arrival and departure of vessels. The official cost of such "services" makes 100-360 USD excluding side payments which remain a serious problem. Users report the fraud practices often to complicate the working process.
3.2
Page 10 of 30
Annex 3
Progress Report I
Contrary to the provisions of the Convention on Facilitation of International Maritime Traffic, despite the timely presentation of all necessary information in written form, free pratique by radio is never granted. Resolutions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine of 24/12/2003 No. 1989 and of 02/04/2009 No. 320 envisage granting of free pratique (vessel port call and beginning of cargo operations) without commission's presence on board of the vessel. In theory this should significantly facilitate and accelerate the working process. But as the decision on application of such simplified form of control is made by executives of controlling bodies (checkpoint, customs office, etc.), in practice, this norm is not applied. It would be necessary to develop a clear and transparent scheme determining whether free pratique shall be granted without participation of the commission on board or the procedures shall be applied on the usual terms. Otherwise there is a clear possibility of aggravating the already mentioned corruption issues. The amount and composition of documents required from a vessel significantly exceeds the norms established by the afore-named 1965 Convention. It is reported the time of waiting for the procedures may sometimes be up to 24 hours. The number of members of the commission often exceeds those of the vessel's crew (agent 1, sanitary inspector 1, border patrol 5-6 persons + dog, customs 4-5 persons, agricultural quarantine inspector 1, veterinary control inspector 1, total 13-15 persons). All of them have to be accommodated, provided with conditions for performance of their functions, granted attention, etc. Each service participating in the work of the commission requires from the ship owner or its agent complete information presented in written form in advance about prospective arrival or departure of the vessel with several subsequent adjustments of time. In addition, such information shall be presented by a ship owner's representative or agent in person in the form of the original application with "wet" stamp. Sometimes the terms for submission of the application are established up to 10 days in advance. Even with the contemporary state of communications, applications (as well as any other correspondence) sent by fax or email are not considered. Standardization of the procedure of submission of necessary information to the controlling bodies using modern means of communication (email) would allow avoiding unnecessary waste of working time and money and help to improve coordination between all participants of this process. Also, taking into account that the time of passage between many ports of Black Sea, Sea of Marmara and Mediterranean Sea is 14 days, the submission of information 10 days in advance is most often unfeasible. The common standard of work schedules (shifts) of all controlling services in the port should be harmonized. Currently non-coordination of shift changes of various services causes the work of the commission to stop from 07:30 to 10:00 and from 17:00 to 19:00, causing unproductive idle periods of vessels and ports. The Decree of the State Customs Service of Ukraine of 17/09/04 No. 678 "On approval of the Instruction on organization of customs control and customs registration of vessels and goods transported by them" and Decree of the State Customs Service of Ukraine, Administration of the State Border Service of Ukraine, Ministry of Transport and Communication of Ukraine, Ministry of Health Protection of Ukraine and other related Ministries No. 1167/886/824/643/655/424/858/900 of 28/11/05 "On approval of time standards of performance of control operations by officials exercising control of persons, goods and means of transport in the points of state border crossing of Ukraine" envisage the following:
Progress Report I
Annex 3
Page 11 of 30
In case of a vessel carrying imported containerized cargo, provided each container holds a separate type of cargo, the term for processing of the vessel may range from the minimum of 12 hours to a maximum depending on the amount of containers on board. Users generally emphasize a high level of acquisitive offence in all controlling services with people demanding money just for the normal and unbiased performance of their duties.
3.3
The following infrastructural factors limit navigation at Dnepr: Maintenance of mid-channel dimensions, dredging operations are not performed at the needed level; Passing of loaded heavy-tonnage vessels of the "river-sea" type is possible only up to Dnepropetrovsk. Further up the depths do not allow using these vessels for full-fledged freight traffic; while vessels with a draft of up to 3.80-4.00 m may pass up to Dnepropetrovsk (depending on the water level), the section between Dnepropetrovsk and Dneprodzerzhinsk HPP has passage drafts of 2.40 and in case of evacuation of water 3.00 m; Navigational support means (buoys, ranges, landmarks) are worn out and in bad condition, lighting is sometimes weak or not operational, landmarks are destroyed;
Page 12 of 30
Annex 3
Progress Report I
Communication between vessels, directors of ports and locks is performed by means of obsolete radio equipment (VHF radios of the KAMA type). Maritime radio stations that are available on almost any vessel and that ensure much higher quality communication are not used. Passing of bridges with limiting dimensions (Dnepropetrovsk two-tier and Kremenchuk) involves vessel idleness and unreasonable expenditures of ship owners. It would be possible to change the financial structure of bridge lifting (including both ship owners and cargo owners who are interested in vessel passage like with ice dues) and develop more convenient and flexible schedule of lifts. Currently the schedule is compiled by the railway management at the beginning of the year for the year ahead (while it is hardly possible to compile a schedule for the year ahead for vessels). The cost of lifting of Dnepropetrovsk bridge ranges from 850 USD to 2500 USD (by request of railway management); Service of vessels in ports (discarding of oil-contaminated and waste water and garbage) in accordance with MARPOL requirements is virtually absent, there are no collector vessels (except for Dnepropetrovsk which still lacks facilities for elimination of waste); Compliance with provisions of the "Instruction on the procedures of collection and jettisoning of water load in water areas of internal river water routes of Ukraine No. 461" is impossible because of the absence of technical means.
3.4
Mandatory pilotage
Mandatory pilotage in the Black Sea basin in general and Dnepr-Bug estuary channel and Kherson seaway channel in particular is monopolized by the state enterprise "Delta-lotsman". Delays of vessels because of absence of free pilots are said to be frequent.
Progress Report I
Annex 3
Page 13 of 30
The Transport Strategy of Ukraine till Year 2020 sets implementation of a state programme of the development of inland waterways. This programme is described in detail in documents of the EU "Support to the Integration of Ukraine in the Trans-European Transport Network TEN-T". The programme sets the systemic packages of reforms and measures including: legislative reforms; administrative reforms; operating reforms; infrastructural reforms and human-resource provision. According to forecasts made by the TEN-T Project, the following indicators are attainable in case of the implementation of reforms (Table 1). Table 1: Commodity Structure of the Potential Cargo Base for River Transport till Year 2015 (000 tonnes) Cargo Sand Iron ore materials raw 2008 (actual) 9,500 2,356 2010 8,000 7,500 2011 8,250 8,800 2012 9,250 2013 2014 2015 Increase 15/08 2,500 9,144
Manganese ore, coke and ferroalloys Ferrous metals Grain Coal Total
A potential market niche for the container traffic on the Dnepr is associated with cargo flows in the regions which could be shifted from landside transport to the river. The TEN-T project assessment suggest the river traffic share to attain the level of 411,800 TEU (including 188,800 TEU as imports and 223,000 TEU as exports), mainly via Dnepropetrovsk and Zaporozhe River Ports (Table 2).
Page 14 of 30
Annex 3
Progress Report I
Table 2: Regional Structure of the Potential Container Traffic via Dnepropetrovsk or Zaporozhe River Port (TEU) Imports Oblast (area) TEU Dnepropetrovsk Donetsk Zaporozhe Lugansk Poltava Kharkov Total 36,771 43,048 53,827 13,985 13,440 27,766 188,837 % 19.47 22.80 28.50 7.41 7.12 14.70 TEU 62,471 66,531 38,295 16,300 14,482 24,904 % 28.02 29.84 17.17 7.31 6.49 11.17 TEU 99,242 109,579 92,122 30,285 27,922 52,670 411,820 % 24.10 26.61 22.37 7.35 6.78 12.79 100.00 Exports Total
The potential volume of the container traffic via Kiev River Port can reach 347,600 TEU, including 177,400 TEU going up the river and 170,000 TEU going down the river (Table 3), which would ensure a balanced trade.
Table 3: Regional Structure of the Potential Container Traffic via Kiev River Port (TEU) Imports Oblast (area) TEU Zhitomir Kyiv Sumy Chernigov Total 13,917 137,602 12,757 13,167 177,443 % 7.84 77.55 7.19 7.42 100.00 TEU 12,179 136,455 11,634 9,877 170,145 7.16 80.20 6.84 5.81 100.00 TEU 26,096 274,057 24,391 23,044 347,588 % 7.51 78.85 7.02 6.63 100.00 Exports Total
The total volume of containers transported on the river can attain the level of 759,400 TEU, including 366,300 TEU going up the river and 393,100 TEU going down the river with the potential annual growth by 5 to 10% in line with the global container traffic growth trend.
Progress Report I
Annex 3
Page 15 of 30
5 5.1
Location: 15-25 km from the estuary of the river Dnepr Kherson is the main port on the major inland waterway (Dnepr) with the largest industrial and agrarian regions of Ukraine situated on its banks. Trade from and to Eastern and Central Europe, as well as from and to the Black and Mediterranean Seas can be carried directly by riverand-sea vessels, while exports to more distant countries is possible by means of direct transhipment from river barges to sea-going vessels. Eight regions on the Dnepr, including Kherson, produce almost half of the total grain crop of Ukraine: their yearly average production exceeds 18 million tonnes or 46% of the total for Ukraine. Kherson Region State Administration started working on the development of a feasibility study for dredging of the navigable part of the Dnepr Delta and the establishment of Kherson Intermodal Transport Logistics Centre in view of the presidential and governmental initiatives on resumption of the navigation on inland waterways. This explains why there is a great deal of proposals for the development of the river traffic, as well as solutions, designs and concepts of cargo container terminals. Some of the most significant initiatives are described below.
JSC Kherson Shipyard provides round the year services for the handling of various types of cargoes, including containers, oversized cargoes, arriving by waterway, railway and road. Its 365m long jetty is equipped with two gantry cranes, 100/16 T l.c. each and 10 T l.c. crane. It can receive vessels with a maximum length of 200 m and draft of 6.6m. The adjacent railways can accommodate 100 railway carriages. The jetty includes an open storage yard of 19,000 sq. m, and covered storehouses over an area of 1,700 sq. m
Page 16 of 30
Annex 3
Progress Report I
Layout of the Prospective Plan of the Socio-economic Development of "Kherson Commercial Sea Port". till Year 2015. Source: port administration.
1. Carrying out of bottom deepening works for a volume of 20 000m3. 2. Construction of a berthing wall of 150 m long. 3. Formation of the warehouse areas 2500 sq. m. 4. Creation of structure of engineering constructions and networks.
Progress Report I
Annex 3
Page 17 of 30
constructions first, such as workshops, outdoor gantries, warehouses etc. Besides, the area is locked by the city and does not offer efficient connection to regional road/rail networks. Project parameters of the terminal are: Length 575 m Width 105 m Depth at the berth - 7.6 m Development area 6 ha Annual capacity 60.000 TEUs
Layout of the design of a container terminal on the premises of Kherson Shipyard. Source: JSSC Ukrrichflot
Page 18 of 30
Annex 3
Progress Report I
SPECIALITY
CONTAINERS
GRAIN
R-R
VEGETABLE OIL
TOTAL
DESIGN CAPACITY, PER YEAR COMPLEX TOTAL AREA, ha LENGTH OF THE BERTH WALL, m CAPITAL INVESTMENTS m USD
250,000 TEU
1 MT
50,000 units
1,5 MT
50
30
13
107
800
750
360
180
180
2270
120
20
30
15
15
200
The project still needs to be supported by a market study, and would require strong commercial efforts in order to attract customers. Its functional organization can be improved. It would also require a phased development.
Situational Diagram of the Kherson River Terminal. Provided by Kherson City State Administration
The availability of an estuary intermodal terminal (hub) in Kherson provides an opportunity for the competitive further relay of containers up the Dnepr with specialised profitable river contain-
Progress Report I
Annex 3
Page 19 of 30
er vessels. It is possible to use specialised vessels with the capacity ranging from 200 to 470 TEU on the basis of the European experience. The Kherson Intermodal Terminal will set an example and provide the necessary experience for the establishment of a network of small river container terminals on a stage-by-stage basis along the Dnepr between Zaporozhe and Kiev; it will encourage the development of the necessary infrastructure and the creation of a large number of jobs in these regions. The Kherson Intermodal Terminal will catalyse the resumption of the navigation on the Dnepr and provide Ukraine with an opportunity for the full-fledged participation in the European NAIADES and MARCO POLO 2 programmes.
5.2
Zaporozhe
Page 20 of 30
Annex 3
Progress Report I
the Krivaya (curve) bay - Zaporozhe shipyard (Shipbuilding and ship repair). The planned berth is on the territory of Zaporozhe shipyard, with present access roads (railway and road). Main problems: all areas have a limited possibility for development, pinch-off the city. The 1st district is far from the possible berth of PJSC "ZAZ", locking is needed in the Zaporozhe lock. PJSC "ZAZ" transferred all customs processing offices on plant territories. Development area 6 ha Length of the berth 300 m with further development up to 700 m Depth at the berth 3,75 m
Layout of the design of a container terminal on the premises of Zaporozhe Shipyard (provided by JSSC Ukrrichflot)
Transportation: the railway track is connected to the railway node of Zaporozhe River Port there is a direct access to the intercity highway Annual project capacity 20,000TEUs. The plans of Ukrrichflot are not connected with the analogical plans of CJSC "ZAZ". Zaporozhe shipyard is not ready as yet, also because of complications with vessels manoeuvring making navigation difficult.
5.3
Dnepropetrovsk
Progress Report I
Annex 3
Page 21 of 30
The port of Dnepropetrovsk handled some containers but stopped the operation - at the moment containers are being handled by another terminal to the North of the river port territory, also on the left bank. Handling rates: Loaded containers 100-110 TEU/day Empty containers 150-170 TEU/day Lifting of railway bridge 1 time per day which is enough for operating the vessel belonging to TAVRIA-LINE, which carries a maximum of 112 TEU on-board. The productivity is however low for the bigger sea-river vessels belonging to Ukrrichflot (DESNA Class 168 TEU BUG Class 331TEU ). River ports are handling containers by pairing conventional cranes, which is inadequate and unsafe and may result in container breakage. However the river port (Ukrrichflot) plans a redevelopment of container business, on the same area, which is well connected to road and rail networks. Development area 3.21 ha Length of the berth 211 m Depth at the berth 3,5 m Transportation: the railway track is connected to the railway node of Dnepropetrovsk River Port there is a direct access to the intercity highway
Page 22 of 30
Annex 3
Progress Report I
Layout of the design of a container terminal on the premises of Dnepropetrovsk River Port (provided by JSSC Ukrrichflot)
Progress Report I
Annex 3
Page 23 of 30
Aquarelle Ltd. Cargo Terminal Port Facility TAVRIA-LINE performs (since 1999) container and general cargo transportation in private (own) containers from Black and Marmara sea ports up the river Dnepr to the Aquarelle Terminal in Dnepropetrovsk. In 2010 TAVRIA-LINE opened a new service from Constanta (Romania) to Dnepropetrovsk. For their operations in Kherson TAVRIA-LINE uses the "JSC Kherson Shipyard" berth and crane. Port complex Aquarelle (Dnepropetrovsk) resources: Portal crane Kranbau Tukan, capacity 40 t
Page 24 of 30
Annex 3
Progress Report I
Gantry crane KC-50-42, capacity 50 t Moorage wall, length 115 m Railroad side-track Container area (customs zone) S=2,600 sq. m Open storage areas for bulk and general cargoes Open areas for cargo storage. CSAV NORASIA as a shipping line is not responsible for the transportation on the Dnepr, and covers only the worldwide legs to/from Constanta and transhipment in Constanta. However, thanks to this cooperation, Dnepropetrovsk and the Dnepr are now included in the world network of CSAV NORASIA. The key commercial factors include: 400-500 TEU/ month import from China 150 TEU/month export worldwide The feeder carriage is performed with 2 vessels of "TAVRIA LINE" which additional chartering of a 3rd ship during the peak seasons. CSAV NORASIA have expressed their readiness to extend this scheme providing additional freight and client base from other ship-owners and opening extra feeder lines from Istanbul or Constanta . Besides, CSAV NORASIA offers favourable conditions for the return of containers to Black Sea terminals with a free demurrage time of more than 20 twenty days.
Handling of a 3000-mt general cargo vessel in the Aquarelle Ltd. Cargo Terminal
Progress Report I
Annex 3
Page 25 of 30
The vessels particulars are as follows: m/v ALKOR, IMO: 8811651 Owner: AQUARELLE LTD Built: 1988 Port of registry: Kherson Flag: Ukraine
m/v ATLAS IMO: 8521866 Owner: AQUARELLE LTD Built: 1985 Port of registry: Kherson Flag: Ukraine
Container capacity: Empty 112 TEU: 34 TEU in hold 78 TEU on hatch covers Loaded from 72 to 92 TEU, depending on weight / stability. The success of Tavria Line relies: on the primary use of own vessels and time-to-time chartering of vessels from other shipowners, a cargo base composed of own and CSAV NORASIA cargo in own and CSAV NORASIA containers handling, clearing and distributing by their own means (including even with their own trucks) Thus offering a full door-to-door service to their and CSAV NORASIAs clients.
Page 26 of 30
Annex 3
Progress Report I
5.4
Kiev
Location: 856 km from the estuary of the river Dnepr Kiev Development Strategy till Year 2025 does not foresee the establishment of a river multimodal facility. Ukrrichflot, on their side, contemplates the future of container transportation along the Dnepr as follows: Their prospective investment projects are intended to cover 20% of the segment (about 100,000TEUs per year) through Dnepropetrovsk (20,000TEUs per year), Zaporozhe (20,000TEUs per year), Kherson (60,000TEUs per year), using their current fleet of river-sea vessels Desna and Bug. Dnepropetrovsk and Zaporozhe terminals are able to provide efficient logistics servicing to Dnepropetrovsk, Donetsk, Zaporozhe, Poltava, Kirovograd, Sumy, Chernigov, Cherkassy and Kharkov regions. Kherson container terminal is able to provide the same to Kherson, Nikolayev and Crimea. This gives an opportunity to cover about 33% of the regional container market (including regions close to Kherson, Zaporozhe and Dnepropetrovsk). Based on volumes which they consider commercially achievable, Ukrrichflot favours the idea of comparatively small terminals.
Progress Report I
Annex 3
Page 27 of 30
THE EU CONTRIBUTION
Since the beginning of the 90s the EU has constantly been supporting Ukraine with regard to redevelopment of inland waterway transportation. The first EU-funded project was entrusted to BCEOM in 1994 under the TACIS programme (Medium-Term Strategy for Inland water Transport in Ukraine) while the most recent one was achieved by Corporate Solutions in 20092010 (Support to the Integration of Ukraine in the Trans-European Transport Network, Waterway Policy Paper). The report issued in 1995 by BCEOM already highlighted some key points such as the need for gearing the inland waterway transport industry to a market economy, the need to make the ports and the fleet more suitable for container traffic, the advantages of developing exchanges between Black Sea ports and Dnepr ports, but unfortunately very few actions were undertaken in this regard. In September 2010 the fully documented Waterway Policy Paper which was issued by Corp orate Solutions in the frame of the European Unions Programme for Ukraine (Integration of Ukraine in the Trans-European Transport Network) proposed an updated action plan aimed at preparing new grounds for re-development of transportation on the Dnepr, consisting of the two following key steps: Improve, strengthen and enforce the draft Law of Ukraine on Inland Waterway Transport. The paper notably foresees introduction in this future Ukrainian law of the legislation of European Union river transport related to marketing systems, access to profession, safety of navigation and river information services. Set up a Directorate for Inland Waterways or River Transport Directorate" within the existing the State Department for Maritime Policy in Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine, aimed at 1) providing increased autonomy for the various river transport functions, activities and business lines, 2) re-orienting the role of the Administration by focusing on legislation, coordination and control, 3) modernising river transport through introduction of commercial intent in management of the river and adjacent territories, 4) stimulating innovation in all sectors related to river transport. However it seems that this recent Waterway Policy Paper was not followed by any practical actions, which is regrettable. The Consultant did notice an inland waterway section in the Transport Strategy of Ukraine for the Period of up to 2020 issued in 2011, but the section provides only principles.
Page 28 of 30
Annex 3
Progress Report I
RECOMMENDATIONS
The 2010 Waterway Policy Paper forms is a solid ground and effort should now be deployed in order to implement its recommendations, which will require a strong political commitment. With regard to exchanges between Black Sea ports and Dnepr ports the 2010 Waterway Policy Paper lacks ambition. The large number of idle river-sea going vessels should be put in condition for operating on routes between the Black Sea and the hinterland, which will first require improved border-crossing procedures in the river mouth region. Effort is also required to facilitate transhipment operations in Kherson. With regard to container trade a river master plan should be elaborated, sharing out the Dnepr basin into several regions each connected to a river port, taking also into account competition with road and rail. Currently, Ukraine is not a real transit state in spite of its geography. It is either the shipper or the end recipient of the cargo (i.e., one of the ends in the logistical chain). The volume of transit of (for instance, high-tariff) cargo is minimal. The Ukrainian river transport complex still relies on technologies of the 1990s. However, the transportation of cargo (especially high-tariff containerised cargo) has changed a lot since that time. Currently, the cargo is transported within logistical networks and between networks of logistical centres. The availability of logistical networks and centres is a factor determining the transit appeal. In order to become a member of the European Transportation Network, it is necessary to establish logistical centres of the European standard attractive for international investors. The development of logistical centres within the existing river ports is constrained by their location in the centres of the respective cities. There is an example of such a logistical centre on the Dnepr in the form of Aquarelle Ltd. Cargo Terminal in Dnepropetrovsk. It is confirmed by the successful operation of the terminal. Development programmes of private companies are pragmatic. They are not always considered in the prospects of the development of the country and do not encourage the development of cargo flows; they rather support them. However, their very existence and implementation are positive factors. The Kherson River Terminal (KRT) project supported by Kherson City State Administration is the most comprehensive solution both for the city of Kherson and for the traffic on the Dnepr in general. If the project is implemented, KRT will enhance the attractiveness of the TRACECA corridor through Ukraine; it is however advisable to develop terminal in progressive stages matching the development of the traffic and to gradually increase the depths of the approach channel. The construction of modern specialised multimodal terminals (with the possible combination of three modes of transport) being parts of regional logistics and distribution centres adapted to the current transportation requirements and integrated into international intermodal logistical schemes should become one of the first initiatives aimed at the encouragement of the river traffic on the Dnepr. The decision to place intermodal logistical centres along the Dnepr and the placement of state orders for the training of qualified workers for the river transport sector must be made on the basis of the development of a State Concept of the Formation and Development of the Logistical Transportation and Distribution Structure of Regions Adjacent to the Dnepr, and the Human Resource Support thereto. The existing projects and business practices confirm that Dnepropetrovsk is currently the most optimal point on the Dnepr for handling container trade delivery based on distance and cost of the transportation, and its competitiveness versus road and rail transport. Measures should also be taken to avoid conflicting container terminal projects in a given port, such as in Dnepropetrovsk. Since the area, in which Ukrrichflot is planning to develop the container transhipment, is very close to (in fact, it is only separated with a fence from) the Aqua-
Progress Report I
Annex 3
Page 29 of 30
relle Terminal (Tavria Line), it would be logical for the companies to join their efforts and projects. The same recommendations hold true for development projects in Zaporozhe (Ukrrichflot and CJSC ZAZ), where the latter could import parts and ship out cars via the river. It would also make sense to use Ukrrichflot's vessels in the overall project due to their larger container capacity and, accordingly, the lower cost of the transportation, the better class of vessels and, accordingly, the higher reliability of the transportation. Developing the existing cooperation and synergy between (a) large shipper(s) guaranteeing regular cargo flows and ship-owners is most desirable. The logistical chain does not amount to a berth and transhipment facility only; it is necessary to pay attention as well to logistics infrastructure and software (modern storage and processing areas, electronic records, and control of the cargo at all stages along the chain, multimodal logistics and distribution centres, etc.) As can be seen from the above report, there are several different approaches and concepts of terminals which is normal since there is plenty to choose from and compare. Some projects encompass the traditional berth handling only. Hub-3 modal terminal - logistics centre would certainly better match the goal of generating synergies, maximize the efficiency of the investments while reducing the necessary funding needs. There is a clear need for a systematic governmental approach of the location of the terminals in order to account for the environmental and socio-economic dimensions of the projects and their harmonious integration within the cities and regions, with a minimum negative result for the environment, an optimal financial performance, a clear outlook and opportunity for further development and integration in the logistics chain. This evidently calls for a permanent, active dialogue involving all key players and professionals from the national, regional and municipal public and private sectors under the leadership of the state.
Page 30 of 30
Annex 3
Progress Report I
October 2011
Page 1 of XX
Inception Report
PROTOCOL OF THE MEETING OF THE LOGMOS AZERBAIJAN TRACECA WORKING GROUP ON THE 2ND OF SEPTEMBER, 2011, IN BAKU
The TRACECA National Secretary in Azerbaijan shared his views and approach towards the Logistical Processes and Motorways of the Sea II (LOGMOS) Project, and agreed on the proposal of the project team to establish a dedicated Working Group of Stakeholders to address the issues hampering the implementation of the LOGMOS pilot projects in Azerbaijan. The meeting was attended by the Head of Group of Experts of the PS IGC TRACECA, the LOGMOS project Team Leader and Key Expert II (list of participants is enclosed to this Protocol). The TRACECA National Secretary selected the participants having the best knowledge and experience in the two previous TRACECA projects in order to maximise the efficiency of the Working Group and benefit from the outcomes of those implemented projects. During this first meeting the Project experts had an opportunity to brief the participants on project objectives, as well as the principles and implementation methodology proposed by the team. The approach was welcomed by the TRACECA National Secretary and other participants. The participants discussed the actions to eliminate remaining barriers and obstacles, in particular, improvement of out-dated practices and adoption of state-of-the-art management tools for building new infrastructures. The participants from Azerbaijan also briefed the TA Team about the latest hard and soft plans, the recent achievements and progress in the transport industry in Azerbaijan, particularly: the decree issued by the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan, Mr. Ilham Aliyev, regarding the modernization of the Railways with a massive 1,5 Bios USD investment plan which includes capital repair of a large portion of the rail network as well as purchase of new rolling stock and locomotives, the rapid progress of the preparatory works in the new Port and ILC location at Alyat, the introduction of a set of new regulations by the State Customs Committee aiming at trade facilitation, improvement of the risk-management system, reducing costs and administrative hassle and addressing human dignity issues, the adoption by the Milli Mclis (Assembly) of Azerbaijan of the New Customs Code. The open discussion on the existing pilot projects gave the participants an opportunity to address also the issue of the Trans-Caspian shipping services offered by the National Shipping Company of Azerbaijan, CASPAR, in terms of regularity, and capacities of the vessels. The implementation of the Block Container Train Poti-Baku project will become a significant achievement for Azerbaijan in the context of the efficient operation and full use of logistics potential of the Alyat Port. For the purpose of the launch and efficient operation of the block train, additional rail-ferry space will be necessary depending both on the type of vessel deployed and shuttle services following the strict schedule. It was also recognized that CASPAR, in order to retain its leadership in the Caspian Basin, has to meet the growing market demand for TIR-truck / Ro-ro services to Aktau and Turkmenbashi ports. The Project team emphasized as well the necessity of obtaining results in a short run in elimination of delays, increasing cost-efficiency and staff retention, benefitting from best practices and lessons learnt in other TRACECA and ex-Soviet non-TRACECA countries in terms of port management, EDI between Customs Houses, unified transport documentation
Progress Report I
Annex 4
Page 1 of 2
(such as those developed for the operation of the Viking Train which Azerbaijan is looking forward to joining soon). The Action Plans prepared by the Project team have been disseminated among the Participants and after this introductory meeting, further sessions will be held with the support of the TRACECA National Secretary in Azerbaijan in order to monitor and assess the level of implementation of recommended actions. The participants from Azerbaijan demonstrated a constructive, result-oriented and friendly spirit highly appreciated by the project team.
Page 2 of 2
Annex 4
Progress Report I
October 2011
Page 1 of XX
Inception Report
LOGISTICS PROCESSES AND MOTORWAYS OF THE SEA II FIRST WORKING GROUP MEETING ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PILOT PROJECTS IN UKRAINE KIEV, 28 SEPTEMBER, 2011
AGENDA Venue: Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine, room 303, 14, Peremohy Str., Kyiv, Ukraine 01135 Host: TRACECA National Commission in Ukraine Participants: As per list attached
28 SEPTEMBER 2011, WEDNESDAY 15:00 17:30 15:00-15:15 Introduction Konstantin Savchenko, Deputy Director of Policy Development Infrastructure Transport and Tourism Department Andreas Schoen, Team Leader of the project 15:15-16:00 Consideration of project proposals, namely: Project realisation in Ukraine: Introduction and Methodology Andreas Schoen, Team Leader of the project Michel Gueriot, Logistics and Shipping Expert Discussion Improvement of combined types of transportation, Extension of the Viking train to other TRACECA countries (Turkey, Georgia) Michel Gueriot, Logistics and Shipping Expert Representative of UKRZALIZNYTSYA Representative of PLASKE All participants interactive discussion and comments on the topic 16:00-16:30 Port Tariffs Improvement Michel Gueriot, Logistics and Shipping Expert Representative of PLASKE
Progress Report I
Annex 5
Page 1 of 6
All participants interactive discussion and comments on the topic 16:30-17:00 Creating new national and international channels and improving existing ones of electronic documents interchange between public and private companies for cargo flows Representative of State Customs Service of Ukraine Representative of PLASKE All participants 17:00-17:30 Other questions Konstantin Savchenko, Deputy Director of Policy Development Infrastructure Transport and Tourism Department All participants
Page 2 of 6
Annex 5
Progress Report I
Conclusions of the meeting Participants of the first Working Group meeting on implementation of the Pilot projects in Ukraine: welcomed continuous support of the European Commission to logistics and MOS development on TRACECA within the framework of the current project; expressed gratitude to the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine and TRACECA National Secretary in Ukraine in support to workshop organization; constituted the continuation of regional dialogue and proactive cooperation within TRACECA intermodal transport and logistics dimensions; focused discussions on RO-RO, containerization trends, logistics initiatives, hinterland connections and interactions with TRACECA countries; invited private sector operators to continue interactive communications on logistics and MOS dimensions of TRACECA in particular aimed at involvement in pilot projects. The beneficiaries and stakeholders: took a note on methodology for reaching the targets set to the LOGMOS project; concluded that results achieved by the former MoS and ILCs TRACECA projects are to be further upgraded in the framework of the current LOGMOS project; noted on further action plans on follow up of the previous MOS and Logistics Projects; considered that TRACECA MoS concepts are to be targeted trough implementation of the pilot projects. Regarding the Pilot Projects: The stakeholders of the Black Sea 1 Varna-Illyichevsk-Kerch-Poti-Batumi International Logistics centre Dry port Euroterminal, Odessa International Logistics centre Commercial park Airport Borispol agreed on methodology recommended in a corresponding action plans to improve the intermodal service and increase cost-effectiveness, agreed that it was necessary to revive negotiations with shipping companies, rail road and port administrations of the three countries to eliminate bottlenecks in order to improve the regularity and competitiveness of the TRACECA ferry lines; considered options to improve the tariff policy of key players and involvement of relevant groups to attract cargoes; offered to establish the so-called door to door rates for regular transportation service (rail road, processing, shipping) to improve competitiveness, proposed the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine to attract the members of the Public Council working under the Ministry in this process; agreed that with the launch of regular traffic, the tariffs and additional charges should be brought to a competitive level as compared to the alternative routes and/or transport types; discussed issues of interoperability between the system of Electronic Customs Declaration of the EU (NCTS) and the Unified Automated Information System of the State Customs Service of Ukraine, as well as ways to improve them, agreed that this topic will be further considered and options for solutions / recommendations will be delivered within the LOGMOS project; examined the current practice of customs clearance, applied for the "Viking" train, using the example of Ukraine, Belarus and Belarus-Lithuania as a positive example for other
Progress Report I
Annex 5
Page 3 of 6
countries in the TRACECA corridor, including Georgia, Azerbaijan for now and the countries of Central Asia in the near future, suggested the use of experience and achievements of the PLASKE company to address this issue. Offered to use international shipping lines to attract cargo and their operation on a regular basis; accepted proposed measures as a basis for their cooperation and implementation guidelines to be further upgraded and shaped within implementation of the project; expressed willingness to capitalize on lessons learned and success stories experienced by the private sector in elaboration of the specific steps in the action plans; emphasized on the commitment and ownership attitude on the pilot project.
Page 4 of 6
Annex 5
Progress Report I
List of Participants
# Institutions Contact details
National Secretaries / authorised representatives National Secretary of IGC TRACECA in Ukraine 14, Peremogi av., Kiev, Ukraine Tel.: + 044 461 65 40 Fax: + 044 486 53 38 E-mail: [email protected] Representatives of the public sector (Ministry of Transport, Railways, Customs Service) 1. Mr Grygorii Legenkyi National Secretary of IGC TRACECA in Ukraine 2. Mr Konstantin Savchenko Deputy Director Department for the Policy of Transport and Tourism Infrastructure Development Ministry of Infrastructure Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine 14, Peremogi av., 01135, Kiev, Ukraine Tel.: + 044 461 65 50 Fax: + 044 486 53 38 E-mail: [email protected] Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine 14, Peremogi av., 01135, Kiev, Ukraine Tel.: + 044 271 41 18, Fax: + 044 271 41 11 Mob.: +38 097 970 98 53 E-mail: [email protected] Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine 14, Peremogi av., 01135, Kiev, Ukraine Tel.: + 044 271 41 61, Fax: + 044 461 52 78 E-mail: [email protected] Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine 14, Peremogi av., 01135, Kiev, Ukraine Tel.: + 044 271 48 79, 351 48 79 Mob.: +38 067 486 97 79 E-mail: [email protected] Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine 14, Peremogi av., 01135, Kiev, Ukraine Mob.: + 38 096 996 36 59 Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine 14, Peremogi av., 01135, Kiev, Ukraine Tel.: + 044 271 41 92 Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine 14, Peremogi av., 01135, Kiev, Ukraine
3.
Mr Oleksandr Diachuk Chief expert Department for the Policy of Transport and Tourism Infrastructure Development Ministry of Infrastructure
4.
Ms Yulia Migai Head of the International Legal Affairs Division Legal Support Department
5.
Mr Yuri Tomchuk Chief Specialist, Department of State Policy in the Railway Sector
6.
Mr Vladislav Plugin Chief Specialist of the European Integration and International organizations Division of International Relations Department Ms Vitaliya Suchina Chief Specialist, Department of Economy and Finance Mr Alexandr Kondrat Head of the Tariffs and Regulation of Natural Monopolies Division of the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine
7.
8.
Progress Report I
Annex 5
Page 5 of 6
# 9.
Institutions Mr Alexandr Zabara Head of the Technical Policy, Audit Work and Regulation of Natural Monopolies Division of the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine Mr Yuriy Merkulov First Deputy Head of the Main Commercial Department of Ukrzaliznytsya
Contact details Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine 14, Peremogi av., 01135, Kiev, Ukraine Tel.: + 044 351 46 93
Ukrainian Railways 5 Tverska Str., Kyiv, 03680, Ukraine. Tel.: + 38 044 465 12 01 E-mail: [email protected] State Customs Service of Ukraine 11. Mrs Olena Moshinska Deputy Head of the Department 11-g, Dehtiarivska Str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 04119 el.: +38 044 483 79 10 Mob.: +38 066 408 26 66 State Customs Service of Ukraine 12. Mr Valeriy Lugovets Head of the International Technical Assistance 11-g, Dehtiarivska Str., Division Kyiv, Ukraine, 04119 el.: +38 044 289 15 23 Mob.: +38 067 445 51 89 E-mail: [email protected] Representatives of private sector (site owners, developers and stakeholders) 10. BFgroup 11 Sahaidachnogo Str., Kyiv, 04070, Ukraine Tel/Fax: +38 044 220 42 82 Mob.: +38 050 703 95 22 E-mail: [email protected] Plaske JSC 14. Mr Viktor Yatsenko Consultant P.O.Box 299, 65001, Odessa, UKRAINE el.: +38 048 7 385 385 el.: +38 044 361 37 30 Fax: +38 048 7 385 375 Mob.: +38 094 926 07 30 E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] EC TRACECA Logistics Processes and the Motorways of the Sea ll project 01034, 8, Lysenko Str., of. 39, Kiev, Ukraine 15. Mr Andreas Schoen Tel/Fax: +380 44 234 03 88, +380 44 288 08 92 Team Leader Mob.: +380 95 877 41 70 E-mail: [email protected] 01034, 8, Lysenko Str., of. 39, Kiev, Ukraine 16. Mr Michel Gueriot Tel/Fax: +380 44 234 03 88, +380 44 288 08 92 Key Expert ll Mob.: + 7 903 788 03 56 E-mail: [email protected] 01034, 8, Lysenko Str., of. 39, Kiev, Ukraine 17. Mrs Olena Nevmerzhytska Tel/Fax: +380 44 234 03 88, +380 44 288 08 92 Regional Project Coordinator Mob.: +380 50 383 77 07 E-mail: [email protected] 13. Mr Vakhtang Mikadze Commercial Director
Page 6 of 6
Annex 5
Progress Report I
October 2011
Page 1 of XX
Inception Report
LOGISTICS PROCESSES AND MOTORWAYS OF THE SEA II REGIONAL MEETING OF LOGMOS PROJECT FOR THE COUNTRIES OF CAUCASUS, CASPIAN SEA REGION AND CENTRAL ASIA TBILISI, 3 - 5 OCTOBER 2011
AGENDA Global objective of the workshop: Promotion of the EC technical assistance to the transport sector in the TRACECA region Facilitation to establishment of the TRACECA corridor based on a network of logistics centres (ILCs) and a network of motorways of the sea (MoS) Encouraging dialogue and regional cooperation within TRACECA intermodal transport and logistics dimensions Specific objectives of the workshop: Summary of the results achieved by the former MoS and ILCs Western TRACECA projects in Caucasus, Caspian Sea region and Central Asia Presentation of the LOGMOS project and its place within the frame of the EU transport policy Proposed methodology for reaching the targets set to the project Adoption of a working procedure, scheduled action-plan and performance indicators by and between the stakeholders of the existing MoS and ILCs pilot projects with the support of the LOGMOS team Host: EC funded project Logistics Processes and Motorways of the Sea II/Regional ENPI East 3 5 OCTOBER 2011, MONDAY- WEDNESDAY LOCATION: Tbilisi, Georgia Venue: Radisson Blu Iveria Hotel, Meeting room 6 Rose Revolution Square 1, 0108, Tbilisi Georgia Tel.: +995 32 2 402 200 Fax: +995 32 2 402 201 Contacts of Event Coordination Team: Yulia Usatova (technical matters, financial settlements) +49 151/526 30 272 Inna Pokydko (conference logistics) +380 93 53 18 988 Local Tbilisi phone numbers of the project team +(995) 557 115 986 / +(995) 557 115 873
Progress Report I
Annex 6
Page 1 of 27
2 OCTOBER 2011 Arrival of participants Free time 3 OCTOBER 2011, MONDAY DAY ONE Venue: Radisson Blu Iveria Hotel, Meeting room 6 Rose Revolution Square 1, 0108, Tbilisi Georgia Tel.: +995 32 2 402 200 / Fax: +995 32 2 402 201
10:00 10:30
Workshop opening and welcome by the Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia Georgi KARBELASHVILI, Deputy Minister, TRACECA National Secretary Welcome by the Representatives of the European Commission Carmen FALKENBERG, Head of Sector European Commission, DG DEVCO,Unit A.3 Centralized Operations for Europe, the Mediterranean and the Middle East Welcome by the Representatives of the European Union Delegation to Georgia Michel JAMBOU, Programme Manager, Transport Sector Welcome and presentation of the purpose of the meeting and adoption of agenda Andreas SCHOEN, Team Leader of the Logistical Processes and Motorways of the Sea II Technical explanation on the format of the meeting Yulia USATOVA, Key Expert III of the Logistical Processes and Motorways of the Sea II
Page 2 of 27
Annex 6
Progress Report I
SESSION 1
10:30 12:30 Methodology for the Achievement of LOGMOS Targets Chair: Carmen FALKENBERG, Head of Section European Commission, DG DEVCO, Unit A.3 Centralized Operations for Europe, the Mediterranean and the Middle East Co-chair: Andreas SCHOEN, TL LOGMOS 10:30 10:45 Presentation of the general objectives and expected results of the new LOGMOS project based on the results achieved by the former Motorways of the Sea for the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea and ILCs Western TRACECA Andreas SCHOEN, TL, LOGMOS 10:45 11:00 LOGMOS Existing projects and working groups Action Plans on follow up of the previous MOS and Logistics Projects Michel GUERIOT, KE II, LOGMOS 11:00 11:15 11:15 11:45 11:45 12:00 Discussion and feedback Coffee break Methodology for the achievement of LOGMOS targets in the regions of Caucasus, Caspian Sea and Central Asia LOGMOS Time-tables and milestones Andreas SCHOEN, TL LOGMOS 12:00 12:15 12:15 12:30 LOGMOS Approach and Event Schedule Yulia USATOVA, KE III Discussion and feedback 12:30 14:30 Lunch hosted by the Project at Hotel Radisson Iveria
Progress Report I
Annex 6
Page 3 of 27
SESSION 2
14:30 17:15 LOGMOS Targets within TRACECA project identification Chair: Carmen FALKENBERG, Head of Section European Commission, DG DEVCO, Unit A.3 Centralized Operations for Europe, the Mediterranean and the Middle East Co-chair: Andreas SCHOEN, TL LOGMOS 14:30 15:00 LOGMOS targets in new projects identification Criteria list Assessment procedure Selection Michel GUERIOT, KE II, LOGMOS Discussion and feedback 15:00 15:30 Development of Pre Arrival Exchange Information System (PAEIS) in Ukraine, Moldova and Belarus as a best practice of C2C: Cooperation on Transit Vadim TURDZELADZE, Senior Expert, EU-Funded Support to the Integration of Ukraine in the Trans-European Transport Network, TEN-T Project Discussion and feedback 15:30 16:00 16:00 16:15 16:15 16:30 16:30 16:45 PAEIS System in Georgia and recommendations Representative of Georgian State Revenue Service Questions and answers Coffee break Logistics Centres in Turkey Ylmaz Asm OZALP, Expert, Undersecretariat For Maritime Affairs Questions and answers 16:45 17:0 UTICAD Presentation Hacer UYARLAR, Secretary General of UTIKAD Questions and answers 17:00 17:15 UND TRANS-CASPIAN PROJECT A new prospect for cooperation between Georgia, Azerbaijan and Turkey in road transportation Burak IGA, UND 17:15 17:45 From 17:45 Wrap up of the introductory day and settlement of agenda for the day 2 Andreas SCHOEN, TL LOGMOS Consultations with the project team upon request / free time
Page 4 of 27
Annex 6
Progress Report I
19:00 19:30 on
Departure to the welcome dinner Gathering at the hotel lobby bus transfer to Tsikvisi (Mill) Restaurant Welcome Dinner at Tsikvili Restaurant Digomi, Beliashvili Str. Tbilisi, Georgia Tel.: + 995 322 53 0797
Progress Report I
Annex 6
Page 5 of 27
4 OCTOBER 2011, TUESDAY DAY TWO Venue: Radisson Blu Iveria Hotel, Meeting room 6 Rose Revolution Square 1, 0108, Tbilisi Georgia Tel.: +995 32 2 402 200 / Fax: +995 32 2 402 201 SESSION 3
09:00 11:00
presentations
port
development
and
Chair: Carmen FALKENBERG, Head of Section European Commission, DG DEVCO, Unit A.3 Centralized Operations for Europe, the Mediterranean and the Middle East Co-chair: Andreas SCHOEN, TL LOGMOS 09:00 09:15 Welcome by Permanent Secretariat of the IGC TRACECA Eduard BIRIUCOV, Secretary General Introduction of the session and agenda Andreas Schoen, TL LOGMOS 09:15 09:30 Presentation of the Poti Port container terminal Zviad CHKHARTISHVILI, Head of Marketing Department Questions and answers 09:30 09:45 Presentation of the port of Batumi by Ilia TSIVADZE, Commercial Manager Questions and answers 09:45 10:00 Presentation of the Batumi International Container Terminal by Ketevan ORAGVELIDZE, Marketing Manager Questions and answers 10:00 10:30 Presentation of the Georgian Railway and GR Transcontainer by Grigol JINCHARADZE, Freight Transportation Deputy Director, Ltd Georgian Railway Mirza DOLIDZE, General Director, Ltd Georgian Railway, Transcontainer Questions and answers 10:30 10:45 10:45 11:00 Wrap up of the session by LOGMOS Team Coffee break
Page 6 of 27
Annex 6
Progress Report I
SESSION 4
Participation is obligatory for the delegates of Azerbaijan and Georgia, Armenia and representatives of the PS Other delegations are welcome to attend 11:00 13:00 Technical Session on Action Plan BT Poti - Tbilisi Baku and Trade Facilitation Aspects Chair: Co-chair: Andreas SCHOEN, TL LOGMOS Co-chair: Michel GUERIOT, KE II, LOGMOS Objectives of the session : establishment of the action plan task force elaboration on next steps needed to implement the action plan suggestions on practical actions to start mitigate the problems decision on format of project presentation with the action plan decision basis for investment forum presentation / on content of the project Introduction of the purpose of the session Andreas SCHOEN, TL LOGMOS Introduction of the Tentative Action Plan Michel GUERIOT, KE II, LOGMOS All participants interactive discussion and comments of action plan for the task force 12:45 13:00 13:00 15:00 Brief conclusions of the session Andreas SCHOEN, TL LOGMOS Lunch hosted by the Project at the Radisson Hotel for all participants
Progress Report I
Annex 6
Page 7 of 27
SESSION 5
Participation is obligatory for the delegates of Georgia and representatives of the PS Other delegations are welcome to attend 15:00 16:30 Technical Session on Action Plan Tbilisi ILC Chair: Andreas SCHOEN, TL LOGMOS Co-chair: Michel GUERIOT, KE II, LOGMOS Objectives of the session : establishment of the action plan task force elaboration on next steps needed to implement the action plan decision basis for investment forum presentation / as a core project or as an additional project Introduction of the purpose of the session Andreas SCHOEN, TL LOGMOS Introduction of the Tentative Action Plan Michel GUERIOT, KE II, LOGMOS All participants interactive discussion and comments of action plan for the task force Brief conclusions of the session Andreas SCHOEN, TL LOGMOS 16:15 16:30 Coffee break
Page 8 of 27
Annex 6
Progress Report I
SESSION 6
Participation is obligatory for the delegates of Azerbaijan and representatives of the PS Other delegates are welcome to attend 16:30 18:00 Technical Session on Action Plan Baku ILC Chair: Andreas SCHOEN, TL LOGMOS Co-chair: Michel GUERIOT, KE II, LOGMOS Objectives of the session: establishment of the action plan task force elaboration on next steps needed to implement the action plan decision basis for investment forum presentation / as a core project or as an additional project 17:30 18:00 FREE TIME Conclusions of the session
Progress Report I
Annex 6
Page 9 of 27
5 OCTOBER 2011, WEDNESDAY DAY THREE Venue: Radisson Blu Iveria Hotel, Meeting room 6 Rose Revolution Square 1, 0108, Tbilisi Georgia Tel.: +995 32 2 402 200 / Fax: +995 32 2 402 201 SESSION 7
PARTICIPATION IS OBLIGATORY TO ALL DELEGATIONS 09:00 10:30 Presentations of the Stakeholders on New LOGMOS Initiatives in Azerbaijan, Armenia, Georgia and Central Asia focus on RO-RO, containerisation, logistics initiatives, hinterland connections and interactions with TRACECA countries Chair: Carmen FALKENBERG, EC Co-Chair: Andreas SCHOEN, TL LOGMOS 09:00 09:15 09:15 09:30 09:30 09:45 Introduction of the session and agenda by Andreas Schoen, TL LOGMOS Containerisation trends in Central Asia and Caspian Region by CMA Selim MAKZUME, CMA-CGM General Manager for Caucasus Port of Baku Akif MUSTAFAYEV, National Secretary of IGC TRACECA in Azerbaijan Actual Status of Baku Alyat Questions and answers 09:45 10:00 Port of Aktau and logistics in Aktau Dauren KUTPANBAYEV, First Deputy Director New Development of the Aktau port relevant to MOS project initiatives Questions and answers 10:00 10:15 Port of Turkmenbashi by NN New Development of the Turkmenbashi port relevant to MOS project Initiatives Questions and answers 10:15 10:30 ILC in Navoi
Page 10 of 27
Annex 6
Progress Report I
Kamol SHARAKHMEDOV, Expert of the National TRACECA Committee,Uzbekistan The Present Status of Development of the ILC in Navoi Questions and answers 10:30 11:00 11:00 11:15 Coffee break ILC in Osh Manas RAIMAKHUNOV, Chief expert, Road and Railway Transport Department, MoT The Present Status of Development of the ILC in Osh Questions and answers 11:15 11:30 ILC in Nijniy Pjanj Nimatullo SOHIBOV, Deputy Director SUE NI and FDI MoT RT (+1) The Present Status of Development of the ILC in Nijniy Pjandj Questions and answers 11:30 11:45 Railway Kolkhoz-Abad Nijniy Pjand Rustam ISHAN-KHODJAEV, Chief Specialist of the Land Transport Department, MOT Questions and answers 11:45 12:00 12:00 12:15 12:15 14:00 South Caucasian Railway Presentaiton Vage DAVTYAN, South Caucasiam Railway Wrap up of the session Lunch at the Hotel Radisson
Progress Report I
Annex 6
Page 11 of 27
SESSION 8
Participation is obligatory for the delegates of Armenia, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Turkey, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and representatives of the PS Other delegates are welcome to attend 14:00 15:30 Presentation of the action plans for ILC in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Armenia Chair: Andreas SCHOEN, TL LOGMOS Co-Chair: Michel GUERIOT, KE II, LOGMOS Approach of the LOGMOS Team towards ILCs in landlocked countries Interactive discussions Wrap up of the session 15:30 15:45 Coffee Break
Page 12 of 27
Annex 6
Progress Report I
SESSION 9
Participation is obligatory for the delegates of Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Turkey, representatives of the PS Other delegates are welcome to attend 15:45 17:30 Technical Session on Action Plan Caspian MOS Baku- Aktau Turkmenbashi Chair: Michel GUERIOT, KE II, LOGMOS Co-Chair: Andreas SCHOEN, TL LOGMOS Objectives of the session: establishment of the action plan task force elaboration on next steps needed to implement the action plan conclusions
Progress Report I
Annex 6
Page 13 of 27
SESSION 10 CLOSING SESSION Venue: Radisson Blu Iveria Hotel, Meeting room 6 Rose Revolution Square 1, 0108, Tbilisi Georgia Tel.: +995 32 2 402 200 / Fax: +995 32 2 402 201
PARTICIPATION IS OBLIGATORY TO ALL DELEGATES 17:30 18:00 Adoption of the conclusions of the meeting
NOTE: 6 October continuation of the PS IGC TRACECA Meeting for the National Secretaries and Expert Working Group on competitiveness of combined railway and maritime transportation on TRACECA. The participation is obligatory for the invited parties. The programme of the event was announced by the PS IGC TRACECA.
Page 14 of 27
Annex 6
Progress Report I
Conclusions of the meeting The first Caucasus and Central Asia Project meeting: welcomed continuous support of the European Commission to logistics and MOS development on TRACECA within the framework of the current project; expressed gratitude to the Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia and TRACECA National Secretary in Georgia in support to workshop organization; constituted the continuation of regional dialogue and proactive cooperation within TRACECA multimodal transport and logistics dimensions; focused discussions on RO-RO, containerization trends, logistics initiatives, hinterland connections to cargo generating centers in TRACECA countries; elaborated on development plans of the Railway Companies in Caucasus to better answer the market demand and address efficiently socio-economic and ecological issues related to transport in the Region, and of the Caspian Sea ports of Baku (Alyat), Aktau and Turkmenbashi, as well as on logistics sector trends in Turkey relevant for unlocking potential for improved trade and international cooperation in the region; underlined the need for active involvement of Shipping Lines in the Black and Caspian Sea in these processes; appreciated the readiness of the Turkish logistics, rail and road industry (as Kars Logistics Center Project) to bring their know-how and actively contribute to improvement of the multimodality and MOS projects in the Caspian Sea; invited private sector operators to continue interactive communications on logistics and MOS dimensions of TRACECA in particular aimed at involvement in pilot projects. The beneficiaries and stakeholders: took a note on methodology for reaching the targets set to the LOGMOS project; concluded that results achieved by the former MoS and ILCs TRACECA projects are to be further upgraded in the framework of the current LOGMOS project; considered and elaborated on the tentative event schedule proposed by the LOGMOS team in the framework of TRACECA calendar; noted on further action plans on follow up of the previous MOS and Logistics Projects; considered that TRACECA MoS concepts are to be targeted through implementation of the pilot projects; recognized a future need for prioritisation of funding for core networks projects in the field of MoS, including exploring alternative means in addition to the TRACECA Investment Forum. The stakeholders of the Caucasus and Central Asia MOS and International Logistics Centers Pilot Projects: agreed on methodology recommended in the corresponding action plans for improvement of service quality and cost efficiency; accepted proposed measures as a basis for their cooperation and implementation guidelines to be further upgraded and shaped within implementation of the projects; expressed willingness to capitalize on lessons learned and success stories experienced by the private sector elsewhere in elaboration of the specific steps in the action plans; considered the examples of efficient implementation of Pre Arrival Exchange Information System (PAEIS) between Ukraine and Moldova (EUBAM) and the facilitation of customs
Progress Report I
Annex 6
Page 15 of 27
procedures practiced in Viking train as a positive step to be noted for development in TRACECA countries in Caucasus and Central Asia; emphasized on the commitment and ownership attitude on the pilot project. The meeting appreciated the support offered by the Permanent Secretariat to facilitate the promotion and implementation of the LOGMOS pilot projects. The participants appreciated continuous support of the European Commission and welcomed the possibility of the individual country meetings to target technical assistance of the LOGMOS project towards actual regional needs.
Page 16 of 27
Annex 6
Progress Report I
Conclusions of the Technical Sessions of the Project Working Groups The Working Groups of stakeholders on the Caucasus, Caspian Sea and Central Asian pilot projects of the LOGMOS Project: Agreed on the methodology recommended by the Project Team for the implementation of the pilot project, namely: - A clear and permanent identification of remaining issues and barriers, - the set up of dedicated working groups to address them, - the drawing of Action Plans in order to formalize the 2 previous points. The Action Plans being meant to be a reference and flexible / adjustable framework, - the splitting of issues between short and long term ones, - the prioritization of technical difficulties, - the elaboration of a working schedule to monitor the results achieved by the working groups. Understood and agreed upon the important role to be played by the working groups in performing the necessary tasks and duties to reach the commonly decided targets. Approved the proposed role of coordination and monitoring of the Project Team in the process. Discussed the contents and distribution of tasks and duties between named stakeholders of the Action Plans prepared by the Project Team, bringing necessary amendments. The Project Team accordingly will issue and distribute a revised version of the Action Plans on the 14 October 2011. MOS Caspian Sea Pilot Projects The Working Group of stakeholders Exchanged actively on issues related to the improvement of the shipping service and, in particular, those whose solution would result in its increased regularity and therefore enhanced attractiveness, a reduction of operational costs and adjustment of existing sea freight tariffs, Emphasized in this respect the necessity: - for the railway companies to address without delay the issues linked with pure railway matters such as planning, preparation and regular up-dating of full and empty wagon loading lists at Aktau and Turkmenbashi and circularizing of same to all involved parties before arrival of the vessels at ports, etc. - for stakeholders to implement such a procedure. The project team will approach them to define by January 2012 a commonly agreed schedule for implementation and period of revision of the practice once in force. These specific deadlines will be included in the next revision of the corresponding action plans. - for the Shipping Line, Ports and Railway Companies to clearly agree upon their working procedures and respective obligations and accordingly sign and implement soonest corresponding operational agreements, - to explore, in cooperation with foreign specialists, the possibilities to implement in the short-term efficient Ro-Ro services across the Caspian Sea to answer the pressing demand from TRACECA trucker associations.
Progress Report I
Annex 6
Page 17 of 27
Agreed upon the fact that, in order to save time and efforts, the stakeholder working groups should capitalize on the experience and achievements of other projects, such as - the Viking Train, for trade facilitation issues - and other TRACECA and ex-Soviet non-TRACECA ports in the Region to upgrade the quality of service and effectiveness of vessels operations at Caspian Sea ports. Agreed that a Technical steering committee shall be established, coordinated by the LOGMOS Project to define and monitor KPIs based on statistical data provided by the stakeholders according to the CS1 and CS2 Action plans. Considered the importance of improving marketing measures, both in pilot projects and by individual stakeholders in regards to TRACECA corridor. This includes measures on routes to Aktau that suffer from limited return loading caused by deficiency in export and transit traffic flows towards/through this destination. Agreed that with the development of the Action plans other stakeholders from Turkey and Central Asian landlocked countries shall be involved in the work of the working groups. Block Container Train Poti-Tbilisi-Baku The Working Group of stakeholders: Exchanged actively on technical, operational and commercial issues related to the implementation of the proposed train. Recognized the enhanced attractiveness of rail transport across the Caucasus would bring about positive results in terms of: - alleviating the problems linked with road transport especially congestion, road accidents and safety of indigenous populations, CO2 emissions, as confirmed by the involved stakeholders - considering decrease in the urgency and amount of investments and maintenance in the road network as a direct result of the block container train or Ro-La operation, - facilitating the regional and international trade through the development of containerization in the Caucasus contributing in turn to the reduction of logistics costs, - opening the possibility to contemplate its implementation further across the Caspian Sea. Agreed upon the fact that, in order to save time and efforts, the stakeholder working group should capitalize on the experience and achievements of other projects, such as the Viking Train, for trade facilitation issues. Agreed to explore the possibility of involving foreign professional block container train specialists to give consulting advice and / or be involved in and / or monitor implementation process. Agreed that a dialogue should be maintained with the users, the Container Shipping Lines in particular. Agreed upon the necessity of an intensive marketing and promotion action of the Block Train through appropriate dedicated means. Noted on implementation of Joint Commission of Deputy Head of Railways which is due to meet in November 2011 for signing the agreement between Georgia and Azerbaijan regarding the block container train.
Page 18 of 27
Annex 6
Progress Report I
Agreed to duly observe the relevant provisions of the existing TRACECA Multilateral Agreement and make the recommendations they consider useful to the PS IGC TRACECA in view of implementation of the block container train. Appreciated support of the LOGMOS project in defining and assistance in monitoring KPIs based on statistical data provided by the stakeholders according to the BCT Action plan. ILC Tbilisi The Working Group of stakeholders: Recalled the European experience on establishment of the logistics centres in Western Europe and state support in creation of the external infrastructures and land acquisition. Noted the clear formulation of the investment project parameters to be an essential initial step to start development of the logistics project Considered that by the end of 2011, a governmental decision on logistics centre development issues will be made including a nomination of the management company for the project promotion. Information on main project parameters as per action plan if obtained by November 2011 will enable duly assistance of the LOGMOS project team in preparation of the project documents for the TRACECA investment forum 2012. Considered the need to define pragmatically the combination of ILC and Block Container train project. ILC Alyat The Working Group of stakeholders: Elaborated on positive aspects of discussing and possibility of streamlining the infrastructure investment projects at the partner ports in view containerization needs expressed by the corridor users, as well as necessity to develop the services to satisfy the global supply chains. Agreed on continuation of the cooperation with the Ministry of Transport to be the main project coordinator to settle the issues of the project implementation issues with the Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Land Resources and other state bodies involved. Noted on the progress of works on construction of the port of Alyat in view of its putting into operation in 2014, and considered important the simultaneous launch of the international logistics centre at the new port. Stressed the necessity of the investor attraction, and activation of work in this at least two years before the port Agreed to direct the LOGMOS project support on assistance in tender elaboration including updates of the feasibility studies and coordination of the infrastructure development plans with the port. Agreed to prepare and to conduct the working group meeting in Baku in March April 2012. ILCS in landlocked countries The Working Groups of stakeholders: Agreed to consider the multimodal connections in the development of the logistics centres in the future, namely: In Uzbekistan to consider the project in the context of the extension towards the multimodality, integration into the hinterland of Caspian ports in Central Asia, and to elaborate on the meaning of the Navoi logistics centre as a distribution hub in Uzbekistan and beyond.
Progress Report I Annex 6 Page 19 of 27
In Tajikistan to consider the Nijniy Pjandj Logistics Centre in the context of development of the transregional railway corridors and to include the extension of site to incorporate railway container terminal. To consider the presentation of the investment project Construction of new railway Kolhozabad-Nijniy Pjandj at the TIF 2012. In Kyrgyzstan, note that the decision of the state bodies is needed for the site boundary, and consideration of Osh in the new railway corridors will be needed. In Kazakhstan to analyse the results of the previous EU funded project on establishment of the logistics centres in Central Asia and to consider the alternative development models with the private investor. To advance the action plans accordingly within the following six months. In terms of Turkmenistan expressed willingness to welcome Turkmenistan at the next meeting. In terms of logistics centre in Armenia, the participants have considered the continuation of the current project work targeted at the support on preparation of the project documents for the presentation at the TRACECA Investment Forum 2012. Agreed to consider the role of the identified logistics centres for the motorways of the sea pilot projects of LOGMOS.
Page 20 of 27
Annex 6
Progress Report I
List of Participants
# Institutions Contact details
Representatives of European Commission 1. Mrs Carmen Falkenberg Head of Sector, DG DEVCO, Unit A.3 Centralised Operations for Europe, the Mediterranean and the Middle East Mr Michel Jambou Attach -Project Manager Ms Camilla Aberg Expert Mr Eduard Biriucov Secretary General DG DEVCO
2. 3.
PS IGC TRACECA 4. Permanent Secretariat of the IGC TRACECA 8/2, General Aliyarbekov Str., AZ-1005 Baku - Azerbaijan Tel.: +994 12 598 27 18, 498 92 34, 498 72 47 Fax: +994 12 498 64 26 Email: eduard.biriucov(@ps.traceca-org.org Permanent Secretariat of the IGC TRACECA 8/2, General Aliyarbekov Str., AZ-1005 Baku - Azerbaijan Tel.: +994 12 598 27 18, 498 92 34, 498 72 47 Fax: +994 12 498 64 26 Email: [email protected]
5.
Beneficiaries Armenia 6. 7. Mrs Ovsanna Stepanyan Director Mr Ilya Klperis Deputy Director of Transportation Sphere, Head of Commercial Work Service in the Sphere of Freight Transfer Jit Express LLC Email: [email protected] JSC "South Caucasus Railway" 50 Tigran Metsi ave., 0005 Yerevan, Republic of Armenia Tel.: +37410 57 27 22 Mob.: +37499 40 02 62 Email: [email protected] JSC "South Caucasus Railway" Tel.: +37410 573674 Mob.: +37499 400 356 Email: [email protected] JSC "South Caucasus Railway" Tel.: +37410 575002 Mob.: +37499 400 219 Email: [email protected] Translogistics Service Freight Forwarding Company Tel.: +37410 561193 Mob.: +37491 40 54 93 Email: [email protected]
8.
9.
Progress Report I
Annex 6
Page 21 of 27
# Azerbaijan
Institutions
Contact details
12. Mr Rafail Mirqulamov Deputy Head of Commercial Department 13. Mr Teymur Mammadov Head of the Department of Transport Processes and Commerce CJSC Azerbaijan Railways 14. Mr Talat Zeynalov Head of argo-Ferry Transport Department, Caspian Shipping Company Georgia 15. Mr Georgi Karbelashvili Deputy Minister, TRACECA National Secretary
National Secretary of IGC TRACECA in Azerbaijan 8/2 General Aliyarbekov Str., AZ-1005, Baku, Azerbaijan Tel.: + 994 50 493 37 78 Fax: + 994 12 493 37 76; 498 64 26 Email: [email protected] Baku International Trade Sea Port Tel.: +994 50 225 52 51 Email: [email protected] CJSC Azerbaijan Railways Tel.: +994 50 291 52 26 Email: [email protected] CASPAR
18. Ms Ketevan Salukvadze Head of Transport Corridor Development Division, Transport Policy Department
19. Mr Giorgi Pirtskhalaishvili Head of Land Transport Division, Transport Policy Department
The Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia 12, Chanturia Str., 0108 Tbilisi, Georgia Tel.: +995 32 299 10 82 Email: [email protected] The Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia 12, Chanturia Str., 0108 Tbilisi, Georgia Tel.: 995 322 991043 Email: [email protected] The Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia 12, Chanturia Str., 0108 Tbilisi, Georgia Tel.: 995 322 991140 Email: [email protected] The Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia 12, Chanturia Str., 0108 Tbilisi, Georgia Tel.: 995 322 991043 Mob: +995 599 092504/900773 Email: [email protected] The Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia 12, Chanturia Str., 0108 Tbilisi, Georgia Tel.: 995 322 991029 Email: [email protected] The Ministry of Economy and Sustainable
Page 22 of 27
Annex 6
Progress Report I
Institutions Chief Specialist of Transport Corridor Development Division, Transport Policy Department
Contact details Development of Georgia 12, Chanturia Str., 0108 Tbilisi, Georgia Tel.: 995 322 991043 Email: [email protected] The Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia 12, Chanturia Str., 0108 Tbilisi, Georgia Tel.: 995 322 991043 Email: [email protected] The Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia 12, Chanturia Str., 0108 Tbilisi, Georgia Tel.: 995 322 991043 Email: [email protected] The Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia 12, Chanturia Str., 0108 Tbilisi, Georgia Tel.: 995 322 991095 Email: [email protected] The Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia Ministry of Defence of Georgia
21. Mr Nikoloz Archvadze Chief Specialist of Transport Corridor Development Division, Transport Policy Department
22. Mr Guga Urushadze Specialist of Transport Corridor Development Division, Transport Policy Department
23. Mr David Javakhadze Chief Specialist, Maritime Transport Division, Transport Policy Department
24. Ms Rusudan Tushuri First Deputy Head of Maritime Transport Agency 25. Mr Vephkvia Grigalashvili Acting Head of Legal Department, Ministry of Defence of Georgia 26. Mr Bakar Metreveli Head of Legal Department, LEPL State Military Scientific-Technical Center DELTA 27. Mr Ilia Tsivadze Commercial Manager
Ministry of Defence of Georgia Tel.: +995 577 28 46 47 Email: [email protected] Batumi Sea Port Ltd 3, Gogebashvili Str., 6003, Batumi, Georgia Tel.: +995 422 27 67 86 Mob: +995 577 20 26 04 Email: [email protected] Batumi International Container Terminal 3, Gogebashvili Str., 6003, Batumi, Georgia Mob.: +995 577 17 27 17 Email: [email protected] Batumi International Container Terminal 3, Gogebashvili Str., 6003, Batumi, Georgia Poti Sea Port (ATM Terminals) Tel.: +995 597 01 40 20 Email: [email protected] Poti Sea Port (ATM Terminals)
29. Mr Giorgi Tsuladze Operations Manager 30. Mr Zviad Chkhartishvili Head of Marketing Department 31. Mr Grigol Bolkvadze
Progress Report I
Annex 6
Page 23 of 27
Contact details 52, D. Aghmashenebeli Str., 4401, Poti Georgia Tel.: +995 493 70126 Mob.: +995 577 426082 E-mail: [email protected] Association of Freight Forwarders of Georgia Tel.: +995 599 93 09 17 Email: [email protected] Georgian International Road Carriers Association Tel.: +995 32 222 75 81 Email: [email protected] Georgian International Road Carriers Association Tel.: +995 32 222 75 81 Email: [email protected] Revenue Service of Georgia Tel.: +995 322 26 11 85 Mob: +995 577 053388/559 24 74 27 Email: [email protected] Revenue Service of Georgia Tel.: +995 322 26 13 66 Ltd Georgian Railway Transcontainer Tel.: +995 599 09 50 05 Email: [email protected] Ltd Georgian Railway Tel.: +995 32 219 89 98 Email: [email protected] Ltd Georgian Railway Tel.: +995 91 19 0088 Email: [email protected] Ltd Georgian Railway Email: [email protected] JS Tam-Tbilisi Aircraft Manufacturing 181 B. Kmelnitski Str., 0136, Tbilisi, Georgia Tel.: +995 32 708412 Fax: +995 32 982551 Mob.: +99577 425917 Email: [email protected] CMA CGM Caucasus Tel.: +995 32 940889 Mob.: +995 77 571212 Email: [email protected] MSC (Mediterranean Shipping Company) Email: [email protected] POLZUG Intermodal LLC Tel.: +995 32 2258200
35. Mr Kakha Markelia Chief Officer, Economic Border Defense Department 36. Mr Tsotne Amashukeli Specialist of International Relations Department 37. Mr Mirza Dolidze General Director
38. Mr Grigol Jincharadze Freight Transportation Deputy Director 39. Mr Ivane Marchavariani Adviser 40. Mrs Salome Kelenjeridze Railway Expert 41. Mrs Nona Tordia Chairman of Supervisory Board
Page 24 of 27
Annex 6
Progress Report I
Contact details Mob.: +995 32 2258200 Email: [email protected] EISA Ltd 12b Al. Kazbegi ave., Tbilisi 0160, Georgia Tel: +995 32 233-59-99 Fax:+995 32 237-48-96 Mob: +995 5 77 40-52-55 Email: [email protected] Economic Prosperity Initiative Tel.: +995 32 243 89 24 Mob: +995 5 99 56 49 89 Email: [email protected] Tel.: +30 210 9400151 Mob: +30 6974 300 376 Email: [email protected] National Secretary of IGC TRACECA in Kazakhstan Mob.: +7701 111 08 96 Email: [email protected] Ministry of Transport and Communications of Kazakhstan 47 Kabanbay Batyr Avenue 010000, Astana City Tel/fax: +7 7172 24 32 94 Email: [email protected] Port Aktau Umirzak, Aktau Mangistau region, 130000 Republic of Kazakhstan Tel/fax.: + 77292445127 Email: [email protected] Port Aktau Umirzak, Aktau Mangistau region, 130000 Republic of Kazakhstan Tel/fax.: +77292445135 Email: [email protected] JSC National Center of Transport Logistics Development Tl.: +7 7172 611736 Email: [email protected] Ministry of Transport and Communications of the Kyrgyz Republic 42, Isanova Str., Bishkek 720017 Kyrgyz Republic Tel.: +996 312 314266 Fax: +996 312 312811
47. Mr Ian Naughton-Rumbo General Manager Liner Services Kazakhstan 48. Mr Marat Saduov National Secretary of IGC TRACECA
49. Mr Alibek Sultanov Expert, International Organizations Division, International Cooperation Department
52. Mrs Azhar Kedelbayeva Vice-President JSC National Centre of Transport Logistics Development at JSC NC Kazakhstan temir zholy Kyrgyzstan 53. Mr Adylbek Akmatov National Secretary of the IGC TRACECA in the Kyrgyz Republic
Progress Report I
Annex 6
Page 25 of 27
Institutions
Contact details Mobile:+996 517 223 747 www.mtk.gov.kg Email: [email protected] Ministry of Transport and Communications of the Kyrgyz Republic Isanova 42 Str., Bishkek 720017 Kyrgyz Republic Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] UTIKAD Senlikky Mah. Sai Sk. No:4/F Floryan 34153 Bakirky / ISTANBUL Tel.: + 90 212 663 62 61 Email: [email protected] www.utikad.org.tr UND Nispetiye cad. Seheryldz sok. No:10 ETLER / STANBUL Tel.:+ 90 212 359 26 00 Fax:+90 212 359 26 26 Email: [email protected] www.und.org.tr TRACECA National Secretariat 80, Rudaki Str., Dushanbe, Republic of Tajikistan Tel.: +992 372 21 09 70 Mobile: +992 91 86 59 491 Email: [email protected] Ministry of Transport of the Tajik Republic Email: [email protected]
54. Mr Manas Raimakhunov Chief expert, Road and Railway Transport Department, MoT
Turkey 55. Mr Ylmaz Asm zalp 56. Mrs Hacer Uyarlar Secretary General of UTIKAD
Tajikistan 58. Mr Solih Muminov National Secretary of the IGC TRACECA in the Republic of Tajikistan
59. Mr Rustam Ishan-Khojaev Chief expert of the Railways Department at the Main Office of the Land Transport, Ministry of Transport of the TR 60. Mr Nimatullo Sohibov Deputy Director of the SUE "Designing, Surveying and Research Institute"" Uzbekistan 61. Mr Olimjon Buranov National Secretary of the IGC TRACECA in the Republic of the Uzbekistan
SUE "Designing, Surveying and Research Institute" Email: [email protected] TRACECA National Secretariat Mustakillik Ave., room 501, 68-A Tashkent, Republic of Uzbekistan Tel.: +998 97 727 57 27 Mobile: +998 71 23 94 149 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected]
EC TRACECA Logistics Processes and the Motorways of the Sea ll 01034, 8, Lysenko Str., of. 39, Kiev, Ukraine 63. Mr Andreas Schoen Tel/Fax: +380 44 234 03 88, +380 44 288 08
Page 26 of 27
Annex 6
Progress Report I
# Team Leader
Institutions
Contact details 92 Mob.: +380 95 877 41 70 Email: [email protected] Tel.: + 7 903 788 0 56 Email: [email protected] 01034, 8, Lysenko Str., of. 39, Kiev, Ukraine Tel/Fax: +380 44 234 03 88, +380 44 288 08 92 Mob.: +49 151/526 30 272 Email: [email protected] Egis International Tel.: +33 1 30 12 48 34 Fax: +33 1 30 60 04 89 Email: [email protected] Egis International Email: [email protected] Egis International Email: [email protected] 01034, 8, Lysenko Str., of. 39, Kiev, Ukraine Tel/Fax: +380 44 234 03 88, +380 44 288 08 92 Mob.: +380 50 383 77 07 E-mail: [email protected] 1 Bakhtrioni Str., 0194 Tbilisi, Georgia Mob.: + 995 577 473 332 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Tel/fax : + 7 727 258 24 49 E-mail: [email protected]
64. Mr Michel Gueriot Key Expert ll 65. Ms Yulia Usatova Key Expert lll
66. Mrs Marie-Gaelle Chabot Project Coordinator 67. Mr Jean-Paul Labattu Financial and PPP Expert 68. Mr Andr Merrien Inland Waterways Engineer 69. Mrs Olena Nevmerzhytska Regional Coordinator
70. Mr George Doborjginidze Logistics Specialist / Coordinator for Caucasus Focus region Georgia / Armenia 71. Mrs Oksana Novoseletska Transport Economist 72. Mrs Elena Pissanaya Regional Coordinator 73. Ms Inna Pokydko Project Assistant
Tel/Fax: +380 44 234 03 88, +380 44 288 08 92 Email: [email protected] [email protected] EC Project Support to the Integration of Ukraine in the Trans-European Transport Network TEN-T 57 Pobedy Ave., 74. Mr Vadim Turdzelatze Office 1312 Senior Expert Kiev, 03113, Ukraine Mob.: +995 322 991043/ +38067 8777315 Email: [email protected] MEDIA 75. Mr David Nioridze Journalist Newspaper Rezonans Email: [email protected]
Progress Report I
Annex 6
Page 27 of 27