IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION In re: ) ) JEFFERSON COUNTY,

ALABAMA, ) a political subdivision of the State of ) Alabama, ) ) Debtor. )

Case No. 11-05736-TBB Chapter 9

THE WATER WORKS BOARD OF THE CITY OF BIRMINGHAMS AND THE CITY OF BESSEMERS OBJECTION TO DISCLOSURE STATEMENT REGARDING CHAPTER 9 PLAN OF ADJUSTMENT FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA COME NOW The Water Works Board of the City of Birmingham (the Board), located at 3600 1st Avenue North, Birmingham, Alabama 35222, and the City of Bessemer, Alabama, located at 1800 3rd Avenue North, Bessemer, Alabama 35020 (the City) and object in pertinent part as hereinafter set out to the Disclosure Statement filed by the Debtor, Jefferson County, Alabama (the County), and in support thereof state as follows: INTRODUCTION On or about July 15, 2013, the Board and the City received the Notice of Hearing to Consider Approval of Disclosure Statement Regarding Chapter 9 Plan of Adjustment for Jefferson County Alabama (dated June 30, 2013). The Board is an Alabama public corporation incorporated and existing pursuant to Ala. Code 11-50-230 et seq. It provides potable water to the Birmingham/Jefferson County 1
Case 11-05736-TBB9 Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 1 of 34 Desc

metro area as well as several surrounding counties. The Board has approximately 194,000 water customer accounts, and approximately 113,000 of those water customer accounts are also County Sewer Customers. The Boards customer accounts represent approximately 750,000 citizens who rely upon the Board for their potable water needs. Pursuant to the provisions of Act 619 of the 1949 Acts of the Legislature, Act 616 of the 1953 Acts of the Legislature and Act 886 of the 1961 Acts of the Legislature, the Board collects sewer fees as an agent of the County. The Board sends out a combined water and sewer bill to its water customers that are also County sewer customers. Also, pursuant to Sections 11 and 12 of Act No. 619, the County, acting through its County Commission, may request the Board to disconnect water service for sewer customers for non-payment of their bills, or the County itself may disconnect such customers. Disconnections for sewer service delinquencies impact the Board since the customer is also disconnected from water service, thereby negatively affecting the Boards revenues. As such, the Board has a vested interest in the long term viability and maintenance of the Countys sewer system in order to ensure that it operates sufficiently so as not to negatively impact the Boards business operations. The City of Bessemer, Alabama (the City) is a municipal corporation incorporated and existing pursuant to Ala. Code 11-40-1 et seq. The Citys public utilities provides potable water to the citizens of Bessemer, Brighton, Dolomite, 2
Case 11-05736-TBB9 Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 2 of 34 Desc

Hueytown, Hoover, Lipscomb, Midfield, & portions of the Bessemer Division of unincorporated Jefferson County as well as to the municipal corporations of Helena (Jefferson & Shelby Counties) and Alabaster (Shelby County). The City has approximately 30,263 water customer accounts, and approximately 19,258 of those water customer accounts are also County Sewer Customers. The Citys customer accounts represent approximately 75,000 citizens who rely upon the City for their potable water needs. Pursuant to the provisions of Act 619 of the 1949 Acts of the Legislature and Act 886 of the 1961 Acts of the Legislature, the City collects sewer fees as an agent of the County. The City sends out a combined electric, water and sewer bills to its Bessemer water customers that are also County sewer customers. The City sends out a combined water, garbage and sewer bills to its Hueytown, Midfield and Brighton customers that are also County sewer customers. The City sends out a combined water and sewer bill to its water

customers that are also County sewer customers. Also, pursuant to Sections 11 and 12 of Act No. 619, the County, acting through its County Commission, may request the City to disconnect water service for sewer customers for non-payment of their bills, or the City itself may disconnect such customers. Disconnections for sewer service delinquencies impact the City since the customer is also disconnected from water service, thereby negatively affecting the Citys revenues. As such, the City has a vested interest in the long term viability and maintenance 3
Case 11-05736-TBB9 Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 3 of 34 Desc

of the Citys sewer system in order to ensure that it operates sufficiently so as not to negatively impact the Citys business operations. The Boards and the Citys interests in the Countys Disclosure Statement and Plan are likewise sufficient for them to be parties in interest pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 1109(b), which is incorporated into Chapter 9 cases via 11 U.S.C. 901(a), in that they have a pecuniary and practical interest in the long term viability of the Plan to ensure that adequate provisions are made to provide for needed capital improvements, maintenance, operations and rates in order to ensure that the Plan offers a reasonable assurance of success and will not negatively impact the Boards and the Citys operations. See In re Jefferson County, 474 B. R. 228, 245, n. 4 (Bkr. N.D. Ala. 2012) (determining factor is whether a person or entity has sufficient interest in the proceeding to merit representation, and the interest may be pecuniary or practical.) (citations omitted); Seraphin v. Morris Publishing Group, L.L.C., 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 488 (N.D. Ga. 2010) (entity that has pecuniary interest that is directly or adversely affected by outcome of proceedings is party in interest); In re Lewis, 273 B.R. 739, 743 (Bkr. N.D. Ga. 2001) (citing Nintendo Co., Ltd. v. Patten (In re AlpexComputer Corp.), 71 F.3d 353, 356 (10th Cir. 1995)); Yadkin Valley Bank & Trust Co. v. McGee (In re Hutchinson), 5 F.3d750, 756 (4th Cir. 1993) (party in interest is generally understood to include all persons whose pecuniary interests are directly affected by the bankruptcy proceedings). 4
Case 11-05736-TBB9 Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 4 of 34 Desc

The most important feature of the proposed Reorganization Plan is the issuance of approximately $1.9 billion of sewer revenue warrants. As a practical matter, the issuance of these warrants will require robust financial and other disclosures concerning the System. Thus, our objections with regard to portions of the Disclosure Statement include objections directed to whether or not the Disclosure Statement contains information necessary to support the issuance of the Proposed Warrants which are the sine qua non of the proposed Reorganization Plan. For illustrative purposes of a model of the type of disclosure appropriate in connection with a major debt issue for a sewer system, the Board and the City submit a copy of the Official Statement of Louisville and Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer District Sewer and Drainage System Revenue Bonds, Series 2013 (The Louisville Official Statement attached hereto as Attachment A), while proffering that the Countys proposed $1.9 billion warrant issue will be far riskier than the Louisville issue and thus will require even more extensive financial disclosure. (See The Official Statement of Louisville and Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer District, Series 2013A and Series 2013B, dated April 23, 2013 available at www.emma.msrb.org/EA522367-E).

5
Case 11-05736-TBB9 Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 5 of 34 Desc

OBJECTIONS The County has filed its Disclosure Statement pursuant to Section 1125 of the Bankruptcy Code which requires a finding that such Statement contains adequate information. Adequate information is defined as: information of a kind, and in sufficient detail, as far as is reasonably practicable in light of the nature and history of the debtor and the condition of the debtors books and records, that would enable a hypothetical reasonable investor typical of the holders of claims or interests of the relevant class to make an informed judgment about the plan. 11 U.S.C. 1125(a)(1). Additionally, case law under this section of the Bankruptcy Code has produced a list of factors that are relevant in evaluating the adequacy of a disclosure statement. In re Metrocraft Publication Services Inc., 39 B.R. 567 (Bankr. N. D. Ga. 1984). Disclosure of all factors is not necessary in every case, and there may be cases in which disclosure of all of the factors is still not sufficient to provide adequate information for the proper evaluation of the plan. Metrocraft, 39 B.R. at 567-68. The factors include: (1) the events which led to the filing of a bankruptcy petition; (2) a description of the available assets and their value; (3) the anticipated future of the company; (4) the source of information stated in the disclosure statement; (5) a disclaimer; (6) the present condition of the debtor while in bankruptcy; (7) the scheduled claims; (8) the estimated return to creditors under a liquidation; (9) the accounting method utilized to produce financial information 6
Case 11-05736-TBB9 Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 6 of 34 Desc

and the name of the accountants responsible for such information; (10) the future management of the debtor; (11) the plan or a summary thereof; (12) the estimated administrative expenses, including attorneys and accountants fees; (13) the collectability of accounts receivable; (14) financial information, data, valuations or projections relevant to the creditors decision to accept or reject the proposed plan; (15) information relevant to the risks posed to creditors under the plan; (16) the actual or projected realizable value from recovery of preferential or otherwise voidable transfers; (17) litigation likely to arise in a non-bankruptcy context; (18) tax attributes of the debtor; and (19) the relationship of the debtor with affiliates. Id. Due to the complex nature of the Countys financial status as well as the complex approach the County is proposing to end this bankruptcy case, the Board and the City believe that the Court should not approve the Disclosure Statement for the following reasons:
I.

FAILURE TO ADEQUATELY ADDRESS FINANCIAL INFORMATION, DATA, VALUATIONS OR PROJECTIONS RELEVANT TO THE DECISION TO ACCEPT OR REJECT THE PROPOSED PLAN: A. The Disclosure Statement is devoid of underlying assumptions and

any discussion or background material on why these assumptions are appropriate to use in the projections for the Financing Plan found in Exhibit No. 9. All references hereinafter made to the Financing Plan are to Exhibit No. 9 of the 7
Case 11-05736-TBB9 Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 7 of 34 Desc

Countys Disclosure Statement. Full, complete and detailed disclosure of assumptions supporting the Financing Plan is missing. B. The Disclosure Statement fails to provide in the Financing Plan

information on assumed changes in water consumption for its customers that result from the plan or from exogenous factors. C. The Disclosure Statement fails to contain in the Financing Plan

sufficient detail on the assumed loss or growth of customers. D. The Disclosure Statement fails to contain in the Financing Plan

information on changes in assumed water consumption per customer that may result from factors such as: i. Price elasticity of demand to higher rates instituted by the new rate structure; Impact of water saving fixtures and the water conservation program to be developed by the County; Variation in consumption due to weather; National trends in water consumption; Local trends in water consumption that may be evident by an analysis of historical data.

ii.

iii. iv. v.

E.

The Disclosure Statement fails to contain in the Financing Plan detail

on the components of sewer revenue or the assumptions supporting their growth over the forecast period.

8
Case 11-05736-TBB9 Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 8 of 34 Desc

F.

The Disclosure Statement fails to contain in the Financing Plan detail

on the sources of Miscellaneous Revenue or support for the growth in the category of revenue. G. The Disclosure Statement fails to contain in the Financing Plan detail

on customers by rate class, either historically, currently, or prospectively, and fails to discuss on how the mix of customers may change and the impact this will have on the projections. H. The Disclosure Statement fails to contain in the Financing Plan detail

or discussion of the Operating Expense assumptions. I. The Disclosure Statement fails to identify in the Financing Plan

sources of funds to pay for $1.2 billion in unfinanced capital spending requirements labeled as CAPEX Shortfall on page two of the exhibit , or to discuss the operational or regulatory impact, e.g., Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), etc., of deferring this identified sewer system requirement. J. The Disclosure Statement fails to contain in the Financing Plan detail

on the categories of future capital spending repair and replacement, regulatorydriven or growth related. K. Section 3.B.5. of the Disclosure Statement states that portions of the

major plant improvements made in the 1990s and early 2000s under the Consent 9
Case 11-05736-TBB9 Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 9 of 34 Desc

Decree are now reaching the end of their useful life. Furthermore, given the burdensome requirements of the Consent Decree, the Disclosure Statement does little to speak to the specific topic of Affordability and how it was given consideration in the proposed settlement. The Disclosure Statement fails to

contain in the Financing Plan discussion on the adequacy of assumed future capital spending to repair or replace these substantial assets. L. In light of the tremendous capital spending requirements placed on

Jefferson County in the past by regulatory requirements, and the fact that four of nine basins still have not been released from the Consent Decree as recorded in Section 3.B.5. of the Disclosure Statement, the Disclosure Statement fails to provide in the Financing Plan assumptions on the amount of future capital spending dedicated to meeting regulatory requirements or justification for the adequacy of this assumption. M. The Disclosure Statement fails to contain in the Financing Plan

information on the source of the interest rate assumptions or analysis of the appropriateness of these assumptions by comparison to other similar noninvestment grade financings. N. The Disclosure Statement fails to present in the Financing Plan

alternate scenarios or a downside case that will enable interested parties to judge risks involved in inaccurate assumptions. 10
Case 11-05736-TBB9 Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 10 of 34 Desc

In fact the Jefferson County

Commission, in a meeting held on July 23, 2013, is reported to have modified the Finance Plan less than four weeks after the filing of the original plan. According to The Birmingham News, one reason for the modification is that the Finance Plans assumptions on water consumption have already proven to be too modest and thus revenue collections are lower than projected (www.al.com, July 23, 2013, [posted 5:00 PM], Jefferson County Commission agrees to $5 b ase charge for all sewer customers; a 13% increase to the average residential sewer bill). There is significant uncertainty involved in a forty year projection. The Disclosure

Statement fails to identify in the Financing Plan key assumptions and test various outcomes under adverse conditions. O. The Disclosure Statement fails to present in the Financing Plan

information on historical or current nonpayment of sewer bills and the impact such nonpayment has on cash flow. P. The Disclosure Statement fails to discuss whether an audit of the

County, or of the sewer system, will be available at the time of issuance of the proposed warrants for the fiscal years ending September 30, 2012, and September 30, 2013. Q. The Disclosure Statement fails to discuss whether the County has the

capability of producing reliable financial information in a timely manner on an annual and interim basis. 11
Case 11-05736-TBB9 Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 11 of 34 Desc

R.

The Disclosure Statement fails to describe the Countys financial

management system and its reliability. S. The Disclosure Statement fails to describe the proposed bond

indenture, official statement and other offering documents. T. The Rate Resolution of the Jefferson County Commission dated

November 6, 2013, (Paragraph IX., page 34), authorizing the March 1, 2013, rate increase referenced its rate consultant to find that the new rates were appropriate and proper. There is no discussion in the Financing Plan or a reference to a consultants report addressing the affordability of the rate structure containe d in the Plan. There is no stated assumption on the growth in Median Household Income in the service area over the term of the Financing Plan. The cost of sewer service as a percentage of Median Household Income is a common measure of affordability (and indirectly, the reasonableness) of sewer service. II. FAILURE TO ADEQUATELY RELEVANT TO RISKS: A. ADDRESS INFORMATION

In the rate resolution passed by the Jefferson County Commission on

November 6, 2012, (paragraph FFF.(i.), page 19), the Countys rate consultant, Eric Rothstein, is quoted as testifying that the long term indebtedness of the sewer system per customer is $21,000, a level he described as extraordinary given typical long term indebtedness per customer for most utilities ranges between $1,100 and $2,000. Under the proposed Plan, the debt obligations of the Sewer 12
Case 11-05736-TBB9 Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 12 of 34 Desc

System initially decrease to approximately $1.9 billion post issuance of the New Sewer Warrants. However, as a result of accrual of interest in the Capital

Appreciation and Convertible Capital Appreciation Bonds, indebtedness steadily increases, peaking at $2.55 billion in year 2031 (See Exhibit 1 to the Affidavit of James H. White, III, attached hereto as Attachment B). This represents an increase in debt per customer from approximately $13,000 ($1.9 billion indebtedness divided by 145,000 customers) to $17,000 ($2.55 billion indebtedness divided by 145,000 customers). The Disclosure Statement fails to

discuss the risks involved in exiting bankruptcy and operating a sewer system with such an increasing debt burden, a burden which, to use Mr. Rothsteins standards, still appears extraordinary. B. The Disclosure Statement fails to discuss the implications of the

financial risk remaining in the sewer system after implementation of the Financing Plan and sale of the New Sewer Warrants. The Financing Plan assumes the New Sewer Warrants will have very high interest rates with yields ranging from 3.50% to 6.75%. The extremely high yields required to sell the New Sewer Warrants indicates a high residual financial risk in the sewer system post Plan implementation. The Disclosure Statement fails to discuss whether this financial condition will limit the systems ability to meet its regulatory obligations and will

13
Case 11-05736-TBB9 Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 13 of 34 Desc

pose a risk of re-entry into bankruptcy and whether a sewer system operating in such a condition will discourage economic development in its service area. C. Paragraph XI.C.3.d. of the Disclosure Statement entitled Additional

Regulatory Requirements, appears to give only cursory treatment to regulatory risk. The Disclosure Statement fails to discuss the rules under development or consideration by regulatory agencies, trends in regulation, or potential regulatory requirements discussed in the environmental community that may ultimately migrate into the rulemaking arena. D. The Disclosure Statement fails to discuss the sewer systems ability to

access capital markets to finance anticipated (the $1.2 billion CAPEX shortfall shown in the Financing Plan for the years 2032 to 2053) or unanticipated contingencies. Therefore, while issuance of parity warrants may be authorized, they may be practically impossible with unknown restrictions in the indenture and the poor financial condition of the sewer system. E. The proposed Financing Plan requires increasing debt service

payments throughout the 40-year life of the indebtedness (See Total Gross Debt Service in Exhibit 9 to the Disclosure Statement. (See Exhibit 2 to the Affidavit of James H. White, III attached hereto as Attachment B). The Disclosure

Statement fails to discuss prior precedent among governmental water and sewer utilities of a constantly ascending debt service schedule, and the risks associated 14
Case 11-05736-TBB9 Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 14 of 34 Desc

with such a debt service schedule. Jefferson County should provide more detail regarding its Financing Plan and include discussion about the potential limitations for accessing financial markets for future bond issues due to this debt service structure. F. At the July 24, 2012, Jefferson County Sewer Hearings, the Countys

rate consultant, Mr. Eric Rothstein, presented material stating that selected assets were not used and useful and that the County should Determine debt levels associated with reasonable, prudently incurred costs. Moreover, the Resolution of the Jefferson County Commission dated November 6, 2012, stated that the book value of the sewer systems assets exceeded the value of facilities required to deliver sewer services by $1.6 billion to $1.8 billion due to the overvaluation of the Kipp assets and excessive costs incurred in construction of wastewater treatment plants. This excluded excess costs incurred as a result of admitted waste, fraud or abuse associated with the Consent Decree work. Adjusting the stated book value of $2.8 billion by the higher and lower estimate of excess cost yields an adjusted book value of the System in the range of $1.0 billion $2.8 billion book value less $1.8 billion overvaluation/excess costs) to $1.2 billion ($2.8 billion book value less $1.6 billion overvaluation/excess costs). The Disclosure Statement contains no discussion of the risks associated with debt substantially in excess of the used and useful value of sewer system assets. 15
Case 11-05736-TBB9 Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 15 of 34 Desc

G.

The Financing Plan to the Disclosure Statement defers 48% of

assumed capital spending requirements for the years 2032-2053, to an indeterminate date such deferral apparently for the purpose of freeing up cash flow to make debt service payments. The Disclosure Statement fails to discuss the risk of such a deferral. CONCLUSION WHEREFORE, the Board and the City object to the Debtors Disclosure Statement, and request that the Disclosure Statement, as submitted, not be approved. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Charlie D. Waldrep Charlie D. Waldrep (ASB-9645-D60C) K. Mark Parnell (ASB-5063-E62K) Mary H. Thompson (ASB-1808-M68M) Kelvin W. Howard (ASB-7248-L68H) Attorneys for the Water Works board of the City of Birmingham OF COUNSEL: Waldrep Stewart & Kendrick, LLC 23232nd Avenue North Birmingham, AL 35203 (205) 254-3216 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

16
Case 11-05736-TBB9 Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 16 of 34 Desc

/s/ R. Shan Paden . R. Shan Paden (ASB-3657-P58R) Attorney for the City of Bessemer, Alabama OF COUNSEL: Paden and Paden, PC 1826 3rd Avenue North, Suite 200 Bessemer, AL 35020 (205) 432-0270 telephone [email protected]

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on July 29th, 2013, a copy of the foregoing motion and the exhibit to the motion were served upon the parties identified on the attached service list by the means specified therein.

/s/ Charlie D. Waldrep Of Counsel

17
Case 11-05736-TBB9 Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 17 of 34 Desc

MASTER SERVICE LIST

VIA CM/ECF: Jefferson County, Alabama c/o Patrick Darby c/o Jay Bender Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP 1819 Fifth Avenue North Birmingham, AL 35203 [email protected] [email protected] Jefferson County, Alabama c/o Kenneth Klee c/o Lee Bogdanoff c/o Robert J. Pfister c/o Whitman L. Holt c/o Samuel M. Kidder Klee, Tuchin, Bogdanoff & Stern, LLP 1999 Avenue of the Stars, Thirty-Ninth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067-5061 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] The Bank of New York Mellon, as Indenture Trustee c/o Gerald F. Mace c/o Michael R. Paslay c/o David E. Lemke, Esq. c/o Ryan K. Cochran, Esq. c/o Paul S. Davidson Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis, LLP 511 Union Street, Suite 2700 Nashville, TN 37219 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Jefferson County Special Counsel J.F. Foster Clark, Esq. Balch & Bingham, LLP 1901 6th Avenue North 2600 AmSouth Harbert Plaza Birmingham, AL 35203-4644 [email protected]

Jefferson County Special Counsel J. Hobson Presley, Jr. Balch & Bingham LLP 1901 Sixth Avenue North Suite 1500 Birmingham, Alabama 35203-4642 [email protected]

Bankruptcy Administrator for the Northern District of Alabama (Birmingham) Office of the Bankruptcy Administrator c/o J. Thomas Corbett, Esq. United States Bankruptcy Court Robert S. Vance Federal Building 1800 5th Ave. North Birmingham AL 35203 [email protected]

Case 11-05736-TBB9

Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 18 of 34

Desc

The Bank of New York Mellon, as Indenture Trustee c/o Bridget M. Schessler The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. 525 William Penn Place, 7th Floor Pittsburgh, PA 15259 [email protected]

The Bank of New York Mellon, as Indenture Trustee c/o Larry Childs, Esq. c/o Brian J. Malcom, Esq. c/o Heath A. Fite, Esq. Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis, LLP Regions Harbert Plaza 1901 Sixth Avenue North, Suite 1400 Birmingham, AL 35203 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Liquidity Agent c/o Steve Fuhrman Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP 425 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10017 [email protected]

The Bank of New York Mellon c/o Debra L. Felder Orrick, Herrington, & Sutcliffe LLP Columbia Center 1152 15th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005-1706 [email protected] U.S. Bank, National Association, as Paying Agent 2204 Lakeshore Drive Suite 302 Mail Code: EX-AL-WWPH Homewood, AL 35209 [email protected]

The Bank of New York Mellon c/o Thomas C. Mitchell Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP The Orrick Building 405 Howard Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2669 [email protected] The Bank of New York Mellon Sirote & Permut, P.C. c/o Stephen B. Porterfield c/o Donald Wright 2311 Highland Avenue South Birmingham, AL 35205 [email protected] [email protected]

Bank of America, N.A. c/o David L. Eades c/o Daniel G. Clodfelter c/o David S. Walls Moore & Van Allen, PLLC 100 North Tryon Street, Suite 4700 Charlotte, NC 28202-4003 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Case 11-05736-TBB9

Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 19 of 34

Desc

Blue Ridge Investments, LLC Affiliate of Bank of America, N.A. c/o David L Eades c/o Daniel G. Clodfelter c/o David S. Walls Moore & Van Allen, PLLC 100 North Tryon Street, Suite 4700 Charlotte, NC 28202-4003 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Bank of America, N.A. c/o Joe A. Joseph c/o Clifton C. Mosteller c/o Cathleen Curran Moore Burr & Forman LLP 420 North 20th Street, Suite 3400 Birmingham, AL 35203 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Blue Ridge Investments, LLC Affiliate of Bank of America, N.A. c/o Cathleen Curran Moore Burr & Forman LLP 420 North 20th Street, Suite 3400 Birmingham, AL 35203 [email protected]

JPMorgan Chase Bank c/o Steve M. Fuhrman, Esq. c/o Ian Dattner c/o Mary Beth Forshaw c/o Elisha David Graff c/o Thomas C. Rice c/o William T. Russell, Jr. Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP 425 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10017 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Regions Bank c/o Jayna Partain Lamar c/o J. Leland Murphree Maynard Cooper & Gale, P.C. AmSouth/Harbert Plaza, Suite 2400 1901 6th Avenue North Birmingham, AL 35203-2618 [email protected] [email protected]

State Street Bank and Trust Company c/o William W. Kannel c/o Adrienne K. Walker Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. One Financial Center Boston, MA 02111 [email protected] [email protected]

Case 11-05736-TBB9

Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 20 of 34

Desc

State Street Bank and Trust Company Sirote & Permut, P.C. c/o Stephen B. Porterfield c/o Donald Wright 2311 Highland Avenue South Birmingham, AL 35205 [email protected] [email protected] Societe Generale c/o Mark J. Fiekers c/o Joyce T. Gorman Ashurst LLP 1875 K Street N.W., Suite 750 Washington, DC 20006 [email protected] [email protected]

Regions Bank, as Trustee c/o Brian P. Hall Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP Promenade II, Suite 3100 1230 Peachtree Street, N.E. Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3592 [email protected]

Financial Guaranty Insurance Company c/o William H. Patrick, III c/o Tristan E. Manthey c/o Cherie Dessauer Nobles Heller, Draper, Patrick & Horn, L.L.C. 650 Poydras Street, Suite 2500 New Orleans, Louisiana 70130-6103 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Financial Guaranty Insurance Company c/o H. Slayton Dabney, Jr. Dabney, PLLC 303 Grande Court Richmond, Virginia 23229 [email protected]

Financial Guaranty Insurance Company c/o Robert K. Spotswood c/o Michael T. Sansbury c/o Emily J. Tidmore c/o Grace L. Kipp Spotswood Sansom & Sansbury LLC One Federal Place 1819 Fifth Avenue North Suite 1050 Birmingham, Alabama 35203 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Case 11-05736-TBB9

Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 21 of 34

Desc

Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. c/o Winston & Strawn LLP Lawrence A. Larose, Esq. Samuel S. Kohn, Esq. Sarah L. Trum, Esq. George Mastoris Carrie V. Hardman 200 Park Avenue New York, New York 10166-4193 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. c/o Mark P. Williams Norman, Wood, Kendrick & Turner Financial Center Suite 1600 505 20th Street North Birmingham, AL 35203 [email protected]

Receiver for Countys Sewer System John S. Young, Jr. LLC, as Receiver c/o Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C. Timothy M. Lupinacci, Esq. W. Patton Hahn, Esq. Daniel J. Ferretti, Esq. Bill D. Bensinger, Esq. 1600 Wells Fargo Tower Birmingham, AL 35203 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Receiver for Countys Sewer System John S. Young, Jr. LLC, as Receiver c/o Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C. Joe A. Conner 1800 Republic Centre 633 Chestnut Street Chattanooga, TN 37450 [email protected] Jefferson County Personnel Board c/o Lee R. Benton c/o Jamie A. Wilson Benton & Centeno, LLP 2019 3rd Avenue North Birmingham, AL 35203 [email protected] [email protected]

Syncora Guarantee, Inc. c/o Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP c/o Jonathan E. Pickhardt c/o Jake M. Shields c/o Susheel Kirpalani c/o Daniel Holzman c/o Eric Kay c/o Robert S. Loigman c/o Xochitl Strohbehn 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor New York, NY 10010 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Case 11-05736-TBB9

Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 22 of 34

Desc

Bayern LB c/o Edward A. Smith Venable Rockefeller Center 1270 Avenue of the Americas Twenty-fifth Floor New York, NY 10020 [email protected] Societe Generale c/o Christopher Blackwell c/o Dan Schulman Ashurst LLP Times Square Tower 7 Times Square New York, NY 10036 [email protected] [email protected] Jeffrey Weissman, D.D.S. Jeffrey Weissman, D.D.S., P.C. Keith Shannon Individually and as Class Representatives c/o Wilson F. Green Fleenor & Green, LLP 204 Marina Drive, Ste. 200 Tuscaloosa, AL 35406 [email protected]

Bayern LB c/o Joseph Campagna Vice President 560 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 [email protected]

Ambac Assurance Corporation c/o Charles L. Denaburg Najjar Denaburg, P.C. 2125 Morris Avenue Birmingham, AL 35203 [email protected]

Ambac Assurance Corporation c/o Miles W. Hughes c/o William P. Smith c/o Robert A. DallAsta c/o Greg Kopacz McDermott Will & Emery LLP 227 West Monroe Street Chicago, Illinois 60606 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Ambac Assurance Corporation c/o Gregory Andrew Kopacz McDermott Will & Emery LLP 340 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10173-1922 [email protected]

Jeffrey Weissman, D.D.S. Jeffrey Weissman, D.D.S., P.C. Keith Shannon Individually and as Class Representatives c/o Brian R. Walding WALDING, LLC 505 20th Street North, Suite 620 Birmingham, AL 35203 [email protected]

Case 11-05736-TBB9

Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 23 of 34

Desc

City of Birmingham c/o Michael M. Fliegel Assistant City Attorney Legal Dept. 710 20th Street North Birmingham, AL 35203 [email protected] Societe Generale c/o Donald M. Wright c/o Stephen B. Porterfield Sirote & Permutt, P.C. 2311 Highland Avenue South Birmingham, AL 35205 [email protected] [email protected] National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. c/o Benjamin S. Goldman Hand Arendall LLC 1200 Park Place Tower 2001 Park Place North Birmingham, AL 35203 [email protected]

J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. c/o Clark R. Hammond Johnston Barton Proctor & Rose, LLP 569 Brookwood Village, Suite 901 Birmingham, AL 35209 [email protected] JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. c/o Lindan J. Hill Johnston Barton Proctor & Rose, LLP 569 Brookwood Village, Suite 901 Birmingham, AL 35209 [email protected]

Anne Elizabeth McGowin, Esq. Legal Advisor Office of the Governor State of Alabama State Capitol, Room NB-05 600 Dexter Avenue Montgomery, AL 36130 anneelizabeth.mcgowin@finance City of Center Point, Alabama c/o Robert C. Keller Russo, White & Keller, P.C. 315 Gadsden Highway, Suite D Birmingham, AL 35235 [email protected]

National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. c/o Mark A. Cody Jones Day 77 West Wacker Chicago, IL 60601-1676 [email protected]

Case 11-05736-TBB9

Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 24 of 34

Desc

Syncora Guarantee, Inc. c/o Matthew Scheck Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 [email protected]

Syncora Guarantee, Inc. c/o Richard P. Carmody c/o Henry E. Simpson c/o Lawrence J. McDuff c/o Russell J. Rutherford c/o David K. Bowsher Adams and Reese LLP Regions Harbert Plaza 1901 6th Avenue North, Suite 3000 Birmingham, AL 35203 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. c/o Amy Edgy Ferber Jones Day 1420 Peachtree Street, N.E. Suite 800 Atlanta, GA 30309-3053 [email protected]

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Office of Reorganization Atlanta Regional Office 950 East Paces Ferry Road, N.E., Suite 900 Atlanta, Georgia 30326-1382 Telephone: 404-842-7600 Facsimile: 404-842-7633 E-mail: [email protected] Lloyds TSB Bank PLC c/o Laura E. Appleby Chapman and Cutler LLP 330 Madison Ave. 34th Floor New York, NY 10017 [email protected] Lloyds TSB Bank PLC c/o Ann E. Acker c/o James E. Spiotto Chapman and Cutler, LLP 111 W. Monroe St. Chicago, IL 60603 [email protected] [email protected]

National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. c/o Corinne Ball Jones Day 222 East 41st Street New York, NY 10017-6702 [email protected]

The Securities and Exchange Commission SEC Headquarters 100 F Street, NE Washington, DC 20549-9040 Attention: Morgan Bradylyons, Senior Counsel [email protected]

Case 11-05736-TBB9

Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 25 of 34

Desc

Lloyds TSB Bank PLC c/o Donald M. Wright c/o Stephen B. Porterfield Sirote & Permutt, P.C. 2311 Highland Avenue S. Birmingham, AL 35205 [email protected] [email protected] Appellant William Casey Appeal No. 1101361 in Supreme Court of Alabama c/o Matthew Weathers Weathers Law Firm, LLC P.O. Box 1826 Birmingham, AL 35201 [email protected] Appellant William Casey Appeal No. 1101361 in Supreme Court of Alabama c/o Edward Jason Dennis c/o Samuel B. Hardy, IV Lynn Tillotson Pinker & Cox, LLP 2100 Ross Avenue, Suite 2700 Dallas, Texas 75201 [email protected] [email protected] U.S. Bank National Association, in its capacity as Indenture Trustee c/o Charles R. Johanson III Engel, Hairston, & Johanson, P.C. 4th Floor, 109 20th Street (35203) P.O. Box 11405 Birmingham, AL 35202 [email protected]

The Bank of Nova Scotia c/o Laura E. Appleby Chapman and Cutler LLP 330 Madison Ave. 34th Floor New York, NY 10017 [email protected]

The Bank of Nova Scotia c/o Ann E. Acker c/o James E. Spiotto Chapman and Cutler, LLP 111 W. Monroe St. Chicago, IL 60603 [email protected] [email protected] The Bank of Nova Scotia c/o Donald M. Wright c/o Stephen B. Porterfield Sirote & Permutt, P.C. 2311 Highland Avenue S. Birmingham, AL 35205 [email protected] [email protected]

Appellant Carmella Macon Appeal No. 1101270 in the Supreme Court of Alabama c/o Matthew Weathers Weathers Law Firm, LLC P.O. Box 1826 Birmingham, AL 35201 [email protected]

Case 11-05736-TBB9

Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 26 of 34

Desc

David Perry, Esq. Finance Director Office of the Governor State of Alabama Office of the Governor State Capitol, Room N-104 600 Dexter Avenue Montgomery, AL 36130 [email protected]

Appellant Carmella Macon Appeal No. 1101270 in the Supreme Court of Alabama c/o Edward Jason Dennis c/o Samuel B. Hardy, IV Lynn Tillotson Pinker & Cox, LLP 2100 Ross Avenue, Suite 2700 Dallas, Texas 75201 [email protected] [email protected] U.S. Bank National Association, in its capacity as Indenture Trustee c/o Clark T. Whitmore c/o Kesha L. Tanabe Maslon Edleman Borman & Brand,LLP 3300 Wells Fargo Center 90 South Seventh Street Minneapolis, MN 55402-4140 [email protected] [email protected]

State of Alabama Department of Finance c/o Rachel L. Webber c/o Jerry C. Olshue, Jr. c/o Kristopher D. Sodergren c/o Robin E. Pate Rosen Harwood, P.A. 2200 Jack Warner Parkway, Suite 200 P.O. Box 2727 Tuscaloosa, AL 35403-2727 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Wendell Major Public Employee of Jefferson County Alabama 3775 Gillespie Road Dolomite, AL 35061 [email protected] [email protected] Beers Properties, LLC Creditor c/o W.L. Longshore, III Longshore, Buck & Longshore, P.C. 2009 Second Avenue North Birmingham, AL 35203 [email protected]

Beckman Coulter, Inc. c/o Kirk B. Burkley Bernstein Law Firm, P.C. Suite 2200 Gulf Tower Pittsburgh, PA 15219-1900 [email protected] The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation A Party in Interest c/o Adam T. Berkowitz c/o Jeffrey Chubak Proskauer Rose LLP Eleven Time Square New York, NY 10036-8299 [email protected] [email protected]

Case 11-05736-TBB9

Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 27 of 34

Desc

Mike Hale, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Jefferson County, Alabama c/o Robert R. Riley c/o Keith Jackson c/o Jay Murrill Riley & Jackson, P.C. 1744 Oxmoor Road Birmingham, AL 35209 [email protected] Gene J. Gonsoulin A Party in Interest c/o A. Wilson Webb Webb Law Firm 4416 Linpark Drive Birmingham, AL 35222 [email protected] David Swanson Interested Party c/o Henry J. Walker Walker Law Firm 2330 Highland Ave. Birmingham, AL 35205 [email protected] Bill George c/o Jon C. Goldfarb c/o Daniel Arciniegas c/o L. William Smith Wiggins, Childs, Quinn & Pantazis, LLC The Kress Building, 301 19th Street North Birmingham, AL 35203 [email protected]

City of Birmingham, Alabama c/o U.W. Clemon White Arnold & Dowd P.C. 2025 Third Avenue North, Suite 500 Birmingham, AL 35203 [email protected]

Jefferson County Board of Education c/o Whit Colvin Bishop, Colvin, Johnson & Kent, LLC 1910 First Avenue North Birmingham, AL 35203 [email protected]

All Temps Systems, Inc. c/o Andre M. Toffel Andre M. Toffel, P.C. Suite 300 600 North, 20th Street Birmingham, AL 35203 [email protected] Elevator Maintenance and Repair, Inc. Creditor c/o Charles N. Parnell, III Parnell & Crum, P.A. P.O. Box 2189 Montgomery, AL 36102-2180 [email protected]

Case 11-05736-TBB9

Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 28 of 34

Desc

U.S. Pipe and Foundry Company, LLC c/o Jeffrey B. McClellan, Esq. 1200 Abernathy Road, NE Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30328 [email protected]

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Indenture Trustee c/o Eric A. Schaffer c/o Luke A. Sizemore c/o Mike C. Buckley Reed Smith LLP 225 Fifth Ave., Suite 1200 Pittsburgh, PA 15230-2009 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 64 Robert Thompson, Aubrey Finley and William D. McAnally et al. on behalf of the Employees of the Jefferson County Sheriffs Office c/o Raymond P. Fitzpatrick 1929 Third Avenue North Birmingham, Alabama 35203 [email protected] Medical Data Systems Inc. c/o Bryan G. Hale Starnes Davis Florie LLP 100 Brookwood Place, 7th Floor Birmingham, AL 35209 [email protected] Charlotte Breece Lillie Starks On behalf of all similarly situated persons in Breece, et al v. Jefferson County Tax Collector c/o Lee Wendell Loder Loder, P.C. P.O. Box 13545 Birmingham, AL 35202 [email protected] B.A.S. L.L.P. c/o Salem Resha, Jr. The Resha Firm 1516 20th Street South, Suite A Birmingham, AL 35205 [email protected]

City of Midfield, Alabama c/o David A. Sullivan 1728 3rd Avenue North Suite 400D Birmingham, AL 35203 [email protected]

BBA Development, LLC c/o Amanda M. Beckett Burr & Forman LLP 420 North 20th Street, Suite 3400 Birmingham, AL 35203 [email protected] Lara Swindle c/o Ann C. Robertson c/o H. Wallace Blizzard Wiggins, Childs, Quinn & Pantazis, LLC The Kress Building 301 Nineteenth Street North Birmingham, AL 35203 [email protected] [email protected] John Madison, IV, inmates and others similarly situated at the Jefferson County Jail c/o H. Doug Redd 5343 Old Springville Road Pinson, AL 35126 [email protected]

Case 11-05736-TBB9

Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 29 of 34

Desc

CSX Transportation, Inc. A party-in-interest c/o James H. White, IV Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C. 420 20th Street North 1600 Wells Fargo Tower Birmingham, AL 35203 [email protected] James Pruitt Interested Party c/o Cynthia Forman Wilkinson, Esq. c/o Larry R. Mann, Esq. Wilkinson Law Firm, PC 215 N. Richard Arrington, Jr. Blvd., Ste. 811 Birmingham, AL 35203 [email protected] James R. Crane c/o Steven D. Altmann c/o Charles L. Denaburg c/o Marvin E. Franklin Najjar Denaburg, P.C. 2125 Morris Avenue Birmingham, AL 35203 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] James R. Crane c/o Sydney Gibbs Ballesteros Gibbs & Bruns, LLP 1100 Louisiana, Suite 5300 Houston, Texas 77002 [email protected]

Unisys Corporation Party in Interest c/o Dana S. Plon, Esq. Sirlin Gallogly & Lesser, P.C. 123 South Broad Street, Suite 2100 Philadelphia, PA 19109 [email protected]

John Mason, IV c/o Dan C. King, III Stewart & Stewart, P.C. 1826 3rd Avenue North Suite 300 Bessemer, AL 35020 [email protected]

Owens & Minor, Inc. c/o Robert S. Westermann, Esq. c/o Sheila deLa Cruz, Esq. Hirschler Fleischer, P.C. P.O. Box 500 Richmond, Virginia 23218-0500 [email protected] [email protected]

Collette Funderburg Creditor and Interested Party c/o Michael J. Antonio, Jr. Greystone Legal Clinic 2516 11th Avenue North Birmingham, AL 35234 [email protected]

Case 11-05736-TBB9

Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 30 of 34

Desc

W.C. Rice Oil Company, Inc. c/o James H. White, IV Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C. 420 20th Street North 1600 Wells Fargo Tower Birmingham, Alabama 35203 [email protected] Delores W. Frost c/o W.L. Longshore, III Longshore, Buck & Longshore, P.C. 2009 Second Avenue North Birmingham, Alabama 3203 [email protected]

Universal Hospital Services, Inc. c/o James E. Bailey, III Butler, Snow, OMara, Stevens & Cannada, PLLC 6075 Poplar Avenue, Suite 500 Memphis, TN 38119 [email protected]

Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc. c/o James C. Huckaby c/o Daniel D. Sparks c/o Bradley R. Hightower Christian & Small 505 20th Street North, Suite 1800 Birmingham, Alabama 35203 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] BNSF Railway Company c/o James H. White, IV Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C. 420 20th Street North 1600 Wells Fargo Tower Birmingham, Alabama 35203 [email protected] Moore Oil Company Creditor c/o Brenton K. Morris Benton & Centeno, LLP 2019 Third Avenue North Birmingham, Alabama 35203 [email protected]

AMCAD 15867 North Mountain Road Broadway, VA 22815 [email protected]

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Indenture Trustee c/o Russell M. Cunningham, IV Cunningham Firm, LLC Landmark Center, Suite 600 2100 First Avenue North Birmingham, AL 35203 [email protected]

Case 11-05736-TBB9

Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 31 of 34

Desc

Innovation Depot, successor-in-interest to Entrepreneurial Center, Creditor c/o Russell M. Cunningham, IV Cunningham Firm, LLC Landmark Center, Suite 600 2100 First Avenue North Birmingham, AL 35203 [email protected]

First Commercial Bank As Indenture Trustee c/o David B. Anderson c/o Deanna L. Weidner Anderson Weidner, LLC 505 20th Street North Financial Center, Suite 1450 Birmingham, AL 35203-4635 [email protected] [email protected] First Commercial Bank c/o David A. Wender Alston & Bird LLP 1201 West Peachtree Street Atlanta, Georgia 30309 [email protected] Jefferson County, Alabama George Carpinello Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP 10 North Pearl Street, 4th Floor Albany, New York 12207 [email protected]

Andrew Bennett, Roderick Royal, et al. c/o Calvin B. Grigsby 2406 Saddleback Drive Danville, CA 94506 [email protected]

The Depository Trust Company, on behalf of the holders of the Jefferson County, Alabama, General Obligation Capital Improvement Warrants, Series 2003-A and 2004-A c/o Lawrence S. Elbaum Proskauer Rose LLP Eleven Times Square New York, NY 10036-8299 [email protected] Bayerische Landesbank c/o Edward A. Smith Venable LLP Rockefeller Center 1270 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10020 [email protected] Internal Revenue Service c/o Kenya Bufford 801 Tom Martin Drive M/S 126 Birmingham, AL 35211 [email protected]

AMSOL c/o John K. Rezac Taylor English Duma LLP 1600 Parkwood Circle, Suite 400 Atlanta, Georgia 30339 [email protected]

UAB Health System c/o Kathleen Kauffman Legal Counsel 500 22nd Street South, Suite 408 Birmingham, AL 35233 [email protected]

Case 11-05736-TBB9

Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 32 of 34

Desc

Luther Strange, Esq. Attorney General State of Alabama 501 Washington Avenue Montgomery, AL 36130 [email protected] [email protected] John A. Vos Esq., Interested Party c/o John A. Vos, Esq. 1430 Lincoln Avenue San Rafael, CA 94901 [email protected]

Vekesha Hawes Creditor c/o Tyrone Townsend P.O. Box 2105 Birmingham, AL 35201 [email protected]

Alabama Department of Environmental Management c/o Tom Johnston, Esq. General Counsel 1400 Coliseum Blvd. Montgomery AL 36110 [email protected] [email protected] University of Alabama Health Services Foundation, P.C. Sirote & Permut, P.C. c/o Stephen B. Porterfield 2311 Highland Avenue South Birmingham, AL 35205 [email protected]

Environmental Protection Agency c/o Bill Weinischke U.S. Department of Justice Room 6028 Patrick Henry Bldg. 601 D Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 [email protected] Ad Hoc Sewer Warrantholders c/o Thomas M. Mayer c/o Gregory A. Horowitz c/o Elan Daniels c/o Amy Caton c/o Jonathan M. Wagner Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP 1177 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Environmental Protection Agency c/o William Bush c/o Brad Ammons Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, SW Atlanta, GA 30303-3104 [email protected] [email protected]

Case 11-05736-TBB9

Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 33 of 34

Desc

National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. c/o Jennifer S. Morgan Hand Arendall LLC 30200 RSA Tower Post Office Box 123 Mobile, AL 36601 [email protected] City of Hoover c/o Leslie M. Klasing c/o April B. Danielson Waldrep, Stewart & Kendrick, LLC 2323 Second Avenue North Birmingham, AL 35203 [email protected] [email protected]

Ad Hoc Sewer Warrantholders c/o Justin G. Williams, Esq. Tanner Guin & Crowell, LLC 2711 University Boulevard Tuscaloosa, AL 35401-1465 [email protected]

Depfa Bank PLC c/o Israel David c/o Gary L. Kaplan Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP One New York Plaza New York, NY 10004 [email protected] [email protected]

VIA FEDEX: Shoe Station, Inc. Attn: Michael T. Cronin, Esq. Johnson Pope Bokor Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33576 Morris & Dickson Co LLC 410 Kay Lane Shreveport, LA 71115 AMT Medical Staffing, Inc. 2 20th Street North Suite 1360 Birmingham, AL 35203 John Plott Company Inc. 2804 Rice Mine Road NE Tuscaloosa, AL 35406 Teklinks Inc. 201 Summit Parkway Homewood, AL 35209

Augmentation, Inc. 3415 Independence Drive, Suite 101 Birmingham, AL 35209-8315 Brice Building Co., LLC 201 Sunbelt Parkway Birmingham, AL 35211

Laboratory Corporation of America 430 South Spring Street Burlington, NC 27215 Attention: Legal Department

Case 11-05736-TBB9

Doc 1916 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:08:44 Main Document Page 34 of 34

Desc