Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 35 views

    Notes, Speculation About Intellectual Dissonance and The Occasion To Challenge The Leadership

    Uploaded by

    BetterHomes
    The document discusses several topics related to intellectual dissonance and national security cases including: 1) The need for all exculpatory evidence to be presented if the punishment is death, especially for US citizens targeted through programs like PRISM. 2) Speculation that the identities of a medical student and naval war college scholar matched a DOD employee, and that the author's wallet was lost in locations related to past shootings. 3) Concerns that a campus shooting was related to a pharmaceutical company facing legal issues, rather than national security, and that proper protocols were not followed in alerting authorities about the suspicious student.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Notes, Speculation About Intellectual Dissonance and The Occasion To Challenge The Leadership

    Uploaded by

    BetterHomes
    35 views2 pages
    The document discusses several topics related to intellectual dissonance and national security cases including: 1) The need for all exculpatory evidence to be presented if the punishment is death, especially for US citizens targeted through programs like PRISM. 2) Speculation that the identities of a medical student and naval war college scholar matched a DOD employee, and that the author's wallet was lost in locations related to past shootings. 3) Concerns that a campus shooting was related to a pharmaceutical company facing legal issues, rather than national security, and that proper protocols were not followed in alerting authorities about the suspicious student.

    Original Title

    *draft* Notes 2013_07_22

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document discusses several topics related to intellectual dissonance and national security cases including: 1) The need for all exculpatory evidence to be presented if the punishment is death, especially for US citizens targeted through programs like PRISM. 2) Speculation that the identities of a medical student and naval war college scholar matched a DOD employee, and that the author's wallet was lost in locations related to past shootings. 3) Concerns that a campus shooting was related to a pharmaceutical company facing legal issues, rather than national security, and that proper protocols were not followed in alerting authorities about the suspicious student.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    35 views2 pages

    Notes, Speculation About Intellectual Dissonance and The Occasion To Challenge The Leadership

    Uploaded by

    BetterHomes
    The document discusses several topics related to intellectual dissonance and national security cases including: 1) The need for all exculpatory evidence to be presented if the punishment is death, especially for US citizens targeted through programs like PRISM. 2) Speculation that the identities of a medical student and naval war college scholar matched a DOD employee, and that the author's wallet was lost in locations related to past shootings. 3) Concerns that a campus shooting was related to a pharmaceutical company facing legal issues, rather than national security, and that proper protocols were not followed in alerting authorities about the suspicious student.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Notes, Speculation about Intellectual Dissonance and the Occasion to Challenge the Leadership

    July 22, 2013 Regarding exculpatory evidence in a national security case, if the punishment is death then all evidence must be brought forward, but only if we are in the United States of America. Without that, anyone could be targeted by PRISM by anyone with the know-how. Foreign targets certainly have been aided in that know-how with the recent disclosures by Snow. The prosecution having full access to incriminate any US citizen by virtue of its own will merely because it has no culpability but only goodwill to protect the state, is no longer valid. Online, I have found a fellow purportedly in the DOD whose face is identical to the medical students. The name of the medical student is shared with a national security scholar in VAs Naval War College. Personally, I have lost my wallet three times over a five year span in two different states: that of Mr. Holmes and of Mr. Kazinskis. I currently reside about five ten miles away from San Quentin, whose delivery of recent releases across the Golden Gate Bridge is every day. A Wall Street email is included in BetterHomes archive. Were concerned about another nine eleven incident? They certainly would not be the only ones. TimesWarner CNN Chancellor was all too aware of the heinous campus shootings over the last fifteen years, as a newsman should be. The psychiatrist did not want to place him in a hold but she did want to alert the authorities about her concern, so she called the campus police. Would no one on campus have been able to discern whether the conflict between the two was about intellectual dissonance the school possibly dispenses a pharmaceutical whose company was fined historically the largest ever by the USDOJ? nothing at all to do with national security? An email in the uploaded archive is from a sergeant who stated she de-activated the students card access when she heard the psychiatrists complaint. The student did not have a chance to work the concern out with the BETA team, per campus policy. The effect of a psychiatrists report within the United States, except those protection personnel responsible for homeland security, is apparently fatal and damning; the US Department of Education must become aware and responsible for this oversight, as should the Federal Financial Aid organizations funding students. The BETA team did not adhere to protocol. The team thought the threat was too imminent to contain locally so outreach was conducted, outside of the purview of campus.

    Brady disclosure consists of exculpatory or impeaching information and evidence that is material to the guilt or innocence or to the punishment of a defendant. The term comes from the

    U.S. Supreme Court case, Brady v. Maryland,[1] in which the Supreme Court ruled that suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to a defendant who has requested it violates due process. Following Brady, the prosecutor must disclose evidence or information that would prove the innocence of the defendant or would enable the defense to more effectively impeach the credibility of government witnesses. Evidence that would serve to reduce the defendant's sentence must also be disclosed by the prosecution. Contents [hide]

    1 Examples 2 References 3 Further reading 4 See also

    Examples[edit]

    The prosecutor must disclose an agreement not to prosecute a witness in exchange for the witness's testimony.[2] The prosecutor must disclose leniency (or preferential treatment) agreements made with witnesses in exchange for testimony.[3] The prosecutor must disclose exculpatory evidence known only to the police. That is, the prosecutor has a duty to reach out to the police and establish regular procedures by which the police must inform him of anything that tends to prove the innocence of the defendant.[4] However, the prosecutor is not obligated to personally review police files in search of exculpatory information when the defendant asks for it.[5] The prosecutor must disclose arrest photographs of the defendant when those photos do not match the victim's description.[6] Some state systems have expansively defined Brady material to include many other items, including for example any documents which might reflect negatively on a witness's credibility.[7] Police officers who have been dishonest are sometimes referred to as "Brady cops." Because of the Brady ruling, prosecutors are required to notify defendants and their attorneys whenever a law enforcement official involved in their case has a sustained record for knowingly lying in an official capacity.[8] snip: Brady Disclosure

    wiki

    You might also like