Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 707 views

    People vs. Gozo Digest - EDITED

    Uploaded by

    emmaniago08
    - Loreta Gozo built a house within the U.S. Naval Reservation in Olongapo City without obtaining the required building permit from the city mayor, violating Municipal Order No. 14 from 1964. - She argued that the naval base was under U.S. jurisdiction and Philippine laws did not apply. However, the court held that the Philippines maintains sovereignty and jurisdiction over military bases under the 1947 agreement with the U.S. - The court affirmed Gozo's conviction but modified the ruling to allow her 30 days to obtain the required permit before demolition of the house would be enforced.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    People vs. Gozo Digest - EDITED

    Uploaded by

    emmaniago08
    707 views1 page
    - Loreta Gozo built a house within the U.S. Naval Reservation in Olongapo City without obtaining the required building permit from the city mayor, violating Municipal Order No. 14 from 1964. - She argued that the naval base was under U.S. jurisdiction and Philippine laws did not apply. However, the court held that the Philippines maintains sovereignty and jurisdiction over military bases under the 1947 agreement with the U.S. - The court affirmed Gozo's conviction but modified the ruling to allow her 30 days to obtain the required permit before demolition of the house would be enforced.

    Original Title

    People vs. Gozo Digest -- EDITED

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    - Loreta Gozo built a house within the U.S. Naval Reservation in Olongapo City without obtaining the required building permit from the city mayor, violating Municipal Order No. 14 from 1964. - She argued that the naval base was under U.S. jurisdiction and Philippine laws did not apply. However, the court held that the Philippines maintains sovereignty and jurisdiction over military bases under the 1947 agreement with the U.S. - The court affirmed Gozo's conviction but modified the ruling to allow her 30 days to obtain the required permit before demolition of the house would be enforced.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    707 views1 page

    People vs. Gozo Digest - EDITED

    Uploaded by

    emmaniago08
    - Loreta Gozo built a house within the U.S. Naval Reservation in Olongapo City without obtaining the required building permit from the city mayor, violating Municipal Order No. 14 from 1964. - She argued that the naval base was under U.S. jurisdiction and Philippine laws did not apply. However, the court held that the Philippines maintains sovereignty and jurisdiction over military bases under the 1947 agreement with the U.S. - The court affirmed Gozo's conviction but modified the ruling to allow her 30 days to obtain the required permit before demolition of the house would be enforced.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    People vs. Gozo G.R. No.

    L-36409 October 26, 1973 FACTS: Appellant Loreta Gozo bought a house and lot located inside the United States Naval Reservation within the territorial jurisdiction of Olongapo City, which she then demolished to build another one in its place. These she did without securing the building permit from the City Mayor of Olongapo City, as provided for in Municipal Order No. 14 Series of 1964. She was convicted by the trial court of violation of the said ordinance, which she contested by invoking due process as taught in People vs. Fajardo. Appellant Gozo maintained that her house was constructed within the naval base leased to the American armed forces. She argued the validity of Municipal Order No. 14 or at the very least its applicability to her in view of the location of her dwelling within the naval base. ISSUE: Whether or not Municipal Order No. 14 Series of 1964 is valid and may be enforced within the naval base. HELD: Yes. First, the Court held that using the precedent in People vs. Fajardo is fruitless because this case contemplates upon defendant Fajardo who tried securing a permit from the Mayor and, when unable to, built his home nonetheless for needing it badly. The case at bar, on the other hand, shows that the appellant never bothered to comply with the ordinance. The Court reiterated that, under the terms of the Agreement between the Philippines and the United States, The Philippine Government has not abdicated its sovereignty over the bases as part of the Philippine territory or divested itself completely of jurisdiction over offenses committed therein. The United States Government has prior or preferential but not exclusive jurisdiction of such offenses. Jurisdiction of the Philippines over the military bases may be diminished but it does not disappear. These bases are under lease to the American armed forces by virtue of the military bases agreement of 1947. They are not and cannot be foreign territory. WHEREFORE, the appealed decision of November 11, 1969 is affirmed insofar as it found the accused, Loreta Gozo, guilty beyond reasonable doubt of a violation of Municipal Ordinance No. 14, series of 1964 and sentencing her to pay a fine of P200.00 with subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency, and modified insofar as she is required to demolish the house that is the subject matter of the case, she being given a period of thirty days from the finality of this decision within which to obtain the required permit. Only upon her failure to do so will that portion of the appealed decision requiring demolition be enforced. Costs against the accused.

    You might also like