Module I: Electromagnetic Waves: Lecture 8: EM Wave Equation With Sources
Module I: Electromagnetic Waves: Lecture 8: EM Wave Equation With Sources
Module I: Electromagnetic Waves: Lecture 8: EM Wave Equation With Sources
Outline
Coming up...
We already have the wave equation satised by E and B in the absence of any charge or current sources: 2 E and similarly for B. However when sources ( and J) are introduced, they affect E and B in rather complicated ways. Therefore (with hindsight) we formulate our problem in terms of A and , the vector and scalar potentials, respectively. When we come to relativity and covariance of equations, well appreciate the importance of A and even more. 2E E =0 t t 2 (1)
A and : denitions
Maxwells equation B = 0 alows us to write B as the curl of a vector, we dene this vector as A: B=A (2)
Note that this does not dene A completely, since A has not yet been dened, so the uniqueness theorem 1 is not satised. Maxwells equation E = B/ t then implies E = This allows us to write E= A t (4) A t (3)
where is a scalar. This is the denition of . Note that is also not uniquely dened.
with any arbitrary scalar , and these new potentials A and will still give us the same E and B. Since E and B are the physically measurable quntities, the potentials (A, ) and (A , ) are equivalent This freedom of choosing any corresponds to the gauge symmetry. We can choose to do the calculations in any convenient gauge, the nal measurable quantities will turn out to be identical / gauge invariant.
If we now use our gauge freedom to make A + + (/ t ) = 0, (called as the Lorentz gauge), the we get the wave equation for A: 2 A A 2A 2 = Jext t t (8)
Now we use the same Lorentz condition as before to replace A by (/ t ), which leads to 2 2 2 = t t (10)
Note that the form of the equation for is the same as that for A, with the charge a the source, instead of the current.
Coming up...
(11) (12)
= 0 J
We drop the sufx on J for the sake of brevity. We already know that for the static situation, i.e. when the ( 2 / t 2 ) terms are absent: 2 (x) = (x)
0
(x) =
1 4 0 0 4
(x ) 3 d x |x x | J(x ) 3 d x |x x |
(13) (14)
We expect (hope) that the solution to the time-dependent wave equation may be similar.
Fourier analysis
Let us try solving a general equation 1 2 (x, t ) = g (x, t ) (15) c2 t 2 by using the method of Fourier transform and Greens function. 2 (x, t ) Write the solution (x, t ) and the source g (x, t ) in terms of their Fourier transforms and g :
(x, t ) =
(x)ei t d ,
g (x, t ) =
g (x)ei t d , (16)
where the Fourier transforms are dened as 1 1 (x, t ))ei t d , g (x) = (x) = 2 2
g (x, t ))ei t d ,
(17) In terms of the Fourier transforms, the wave equation becomes 2 (x) = g (x) (18) c2 which well now try solving using the method of Greens function. 2 (x) +
(20)
This may be checked by explicit substitution. The Greens equation is spherically symmetric, so we expect a spherically symmetric solution, i.e. G(x x ) is simply G(r ). The Greens equation is then 1 [rG(r )] + k 2 G(r ) = (r ) r r This has a solution (that may be checked by substitution): G(r ) = 1 ikr 1 e G(x, x ) = eik |xx | 4 r 4 |x x | (22) (21)
|x x | J x ,t
|xx | c
d 3x
1 4 0
0 A(x, t ) = 4
|x x |
d 3x
0 4
Denitions of the potentials A and , gauge freedom Lorentz gauge and wave equations for A and in the presence of sources (charges and currents) Solution to the wave equation in vacuum, using Fourier transforms and Greens function Advanced and retarded solutions for the potentials A and