PREVAL

Ie
BUREAU OF MINES
INFORMATION CIRCULAR/1992
PREVAL: Prefeasibility Software
Program For Evaluating
Mineral Properties
Version 1.01
Users Manual
Using Lotus 1-2-3 release 2.01 or newer
By R. Craig Smith
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Mission: As the Nation' s principal conservation
agency, the Department of the Interior has respon-
sibility for most of our nationally-owned public
lands and natural and cultural resources. This
includes fostering wise use of our land and water
resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, pre-
serving the environmental and cultural values of
our national parks and historical places, and pro-
viding for the enjoyment of life through outdoor
recreation. The Department assesses our energy
and mineral resources and works to assure that
their development is in the best interests of all
our people. The Department also promotes the
goals of the Take Pride in America campaign by
encouraging stewardship and citizen responsibil-
ity for the public lands and promoting citizen par-
ticipation in their care. The Department also has
a major responsibility for American Indian reser-
vation communities and for people who live in
Island Territories under U.S. Administration.

Information Circular 9307
PREVAL: Prefeasibility Software
Program For Evaluating
Mineral Properties
Version 1.01
Users Manual
Using Lotus 1-2-3 release 2.01 or newer
By R. Craig Smith
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary
BUREAU OF MINES
T S Ary, Director
Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data:
Smith, R Craig.
Preval : prefeasibility software program for evaluating mineral properties / by
R. Craig Smith.
p. cm. - (Information circular, 9307)
Includes bibliographical references.
1. PREVAL. 2. Mine valuation---{:omputer programs. I. Title. II. Series:
Information circular (U.S. Bureau of Mines); 9307.
TN29S.U4 [TN272] 622 s--dc20 [338.2'3] 91-48033 eIP
CONTENTS
Page
Abstract. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Getting started . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Accessing PREY AL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Running PREY AL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Stopping and restarting PREY AL ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Modifying PREY AL defaults .................... . ...................................... 13
Operational defaults . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Information defaults . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Sensitivity analysis .......... .. ........ .... ....................................... .. .. 15
Price determination ..................................... . .......................... 15
Appendix A-PREVAL technical assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Appendix B.-Spreadsheet map. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Appendix C.-Smelter and refmery locations ..... . ...... ... . ............ .. ............. . .... 25
Appendix D.-Railroad transportation map ...... ... ........................................ 27
Appendix E.-Library information screens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Appendix F.-Sample computer printout . ..... .. ........................................... 32
ILLUSTRATIONS
1. Main menu screen .............................................................. 3
2. Welcome screen ................................... .. ...... ... .................. 4
3. Production rate override screen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. Reserve estimate screen .......................................................... 5
5. Grade estimate screen. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
6. Depth to ore body screen ................................. .... .................... 6
7. Type of deposit screen ......... . .......................................... .. .. . .. 6
8. Width and dip screen ........ . . .. . ..... .......................................... 7
9. Ore strength screen. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 'j
10. Rock strength screen ....... . ...... , ....... , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
11. Mining method selection summary screen ............................................. 8
12. Selected mining method screen ........... ...... ............................ . ....... 9
13. Mill model selection screen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
14. Mill model description screen . ...... . ..................................... ..... ... . 10
15. Caution screen .. .. .. ... . . . ..... .. ...... . ....................................... 10
16. Change grades screen .... .. .............. . ....................................... 11
17. Transportation screen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
18. Mississippi Valley Type screen. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
19. Print summary screen ... .. .. .. ................................................... 12
20. Modification menu screen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
21. Costs menu screen ............. . ............................... .. .... . .......... 14
AI. Flow diagram for mineral property evaluations using PREVAL ............................. 17
C-1. North American smelter and refillery complexes ........................................ 26
A-I.
A-2.
A-3.
A-4.
C-1.
TABLES
Mill recoveries
Transportation rates ......................... ... ............. .. ....... .. ........ .
Concentrate smelter jrefinery schedules ........... . ............... . .............. . .. . .
Economic evaluation assumptions .................................................. .
Smelter and refinery locations ................ . . . ..... ............ ................. .
19
20
20
22
25
UNIT OF MEASURE ABBREVIATIONS IN THIS REPORT
per year mi mile
$ dollar %
cone dollar per short ton concentrate RAM Random access memory
$jst ore dollar per short ton ore st short ton
f.o.b. free on board st/day short ton per day
gjmt gram per metric ton st mi short ton mile
k tr oz troy ounce
km kilometer tr ozjst ounce per short ton
Ib pound
DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY
The U.S. Bureau of Mines expressly declares that are no warranties or which apply to the
software contained herein. By and use said software, which is conveyed to the user without consideration
by the Bureau of the user hereof waives any and all claims damage and/or suits or by reason
of injury, or property including special, consequential or other similar out of or in any
way connected with the use the software contained herein.
PREVAL: PREFEASIBILITY SOFTWARE PROGRAM
FOR EVALUATING MINERAL PROPERTIES
By R. Craig Smith
1
ABSTRACT
This report presents the software documentation for PREY AL, a prefeasibility mineral property
evaluation program developed by the U.S. Bureau of Mines on a Lotus 1-2-3
2
spreadsheet. It is
presented in a step-by-step "users manual" format. Appendixes contain the technical assumptions,
program default values, and a summary printout detailing capital and operating costs and cash-flow
analysis.
IPhysical scientist, Intermountain Field Operations Center, U.S. Bureau of Mines, Denver, CO.
2Reference to specific products does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Bureau of Mines.
2
INTRODUCTION
PREY AL is a software program developed on a Lotus
1-2-3 spreadsheet for prefeasibility valuation of mineral
properties. It is a composite of many products developed
by the U.S. Bureau of Mines for various aspects of mineral
property evaluation, such as the Cost Estimating System
(CES) handbooks and the economic analysis program
(MINSIM). It was developed to enhance studies for the
Minerals Availability and Mineral Land Assessment pro-
grams. The cost models used in PREY AL were developed
by Thomas W. Camm, mining engineer, Bureau of Mines,
Western Field Operations Center, Spokane, WA. The
Federal tax routines were developed by Gary R. Peterson,
mineral economist, Bureau of Mines, Minerals Availability
Field Office, Denver, CO.
PREY AL is unique in that it utilizes aspects of expert
systems programming to ask questions, make decisions,
and then allow for user override. The software is design-
ed to make as estimate of the total cost of production for
a mineral property when not much is known about the
mineral potential. The system works best for comparing
the relative values of mineral properties and playing the
"what if" game. The user should be cautious, however; the
results should not be used as definitive numbers for any
one property. Also, the individual cost components for
each model should not be used separately because they are
less accurate than the total cost estimate.
The PRE VAL advantage is that estimates can become
more accurate, when better information about a property
is obtained, by allowing the user to modify program de-
faults through the menu system. For example, PREVAL
uses a gold recovery of 70% for heap leach processing;
however, if analytical tests of the ore indicate a recovery
of 76%, then the menu system can be used to change the
program default of 70% to 76%. Thus, the results can be
"improved" if the user has additional information about the
ore body.
PREY AL is essentially one giant macro. When the file
is retrieved into 1-2-3, the program starts running automat-
ically. It asks questions, processes information, asks more
questions, and so on until the user has worked through the
entire macro. The last thing the program asks is whether
the user wants a printout or to just display the summary
within the spreadsheet.
GETTING STARTED
Before trying to access the program, copy the disk to
the directory that contains the copy of Lotus 1-2-3. This
step is very important because PREY AL is an autoexecute
program whereby "getting" the file automatically starts the
program. Furthermore, the PREY AL spreadsheet is pur-
posely left unprotected, to allow the user to modify pro-
gram defaults, so it is very easy to accidently write over
cell information.
In order to run PREY AL, the user must have Lotus
1-2-3 release 2.01 or newer installed on the Pc. PRE VAL
requires 640 K of RAM. It is assumed that the user is ac-
quainted with Lotus, but being a proficient operator is not
necessary. New Lotus users should go through the tutorial
program before running PREY AL.
Now follow the instructions in the lotus manual to
start the program. When the blank spreadsheet screen
appears, the user may now retrieve PREVAL and start the
evaluation.
ACCESSING PREVAL
To access PREY AL, first get to the Lotus menu by
pressing "j" for the menu (without the quotes), then press
"P' for File, and then press "R" for Retrieve. Notice that
the menu has several rues, highlight "INTRa" or type in
the file name "INTRa." INTRa is a small rue that
introduces the PREVAL program, includes a Bureau
disclaimer, and then accesses and automatically starts
the PREY AL program. The user can also highlight
"PREV AL" or type in "PREVAL" as a shortcut that
bypasses INTRa.
The first screen to appear when PREY AL is accessed
is shown in figure 1. This is the main menu, which allows
one of three things to be done: RUN the program, MOD-
IFY data within the program, or QUIT and exit the pro-
gram. The user can make a selection by one of two meth-
ods: highlighting the appropriate word in the menu by
using the arrow keys and pressing "Enter" or by typing the
first letter of the word for the desired function.
Start with RUN. When running PREVAL, keep the
following in mind. First, after selecting RUN, note the
3
AA250: MENU
RUN MODIFY QUIT
- RUN - This will begin the evaluation.
AA AB AC AD AE AF AG AH
250
251
252 WELCOME TO THE MAIN MENU
253
254
255
OF THE PREFEASIBILITY METHODOLOGY SYSTEM
(PREVAL)
256
257 PLEASE CONTINUE BY ENTERING YOUR SELECTION
258
259
260 - RUN - This will begin the evaluation.
261 - MODIFY - This will allow you to change evaluation criteria.
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
17-Jan-92
- QUIT Exit the system.
12:22 PM CMD CALC NUM
Figure 1.-Main menu screen.
mode indicator in the upper right-hand corner of the
screen. The mode indicator will show a flashing "WAlT"
while it is working. At any time throughout the program,
do not enter any data until the mode indicator shows
"READY." Be patient because PRE V AL has a lot of work
to do after each set of data is entered.
Second, the cursor (or highlighted cell on the screen) is
always positioned at the cell where the user is required to
enter information. CAUTION, always use the "enter" key
to enter data. If the "arrow" keys are used, the macro
does not input the information and will not run properly.
Also, enter a value where required. This includes "0"
(zero) rather than a blank because Lotus does not neces-
sarily interpret a blank as meaning "0." The same is true
for My" or "N" entries. A blank entry will be misinterpret-
ed by the macro.
Third, if data were inadvertently typed incorrectly and
"ENTER" was not pressed, use the "Backspace" key to edit
the data. However, if data were entered incorrectly and
"Enter" was pressed, it cannot be changed! Stop the mac-
ro and restart PREY AL. Please refer to the section on
Stopping and Restarting PRE V AL.
RUNNING PREVAL
If "R" for RUN was pressed or "RUN" highlighted and
"Enter" pressed, one of two possible screens may appear
depending on previous program use. The first screen to
appear begins with a few "bells" and is actually a two-part
screen that first asks the name of the property to be
evaluated (fig. 2). Type in the property name, check what
was typed by looking in the upper menu area, and then
press "Enter." The second part of the screen will appear.
Type in user's name and press "Enter."
If the above screen does not appear, then the following
screen will appear (fig. 3). This screen is displayed when
PREVAL has been modified to use the production rate
override capability rather than the automatic calculation
method. This capability will be discussed more fully in the
Sensitivity Analysis section. But for now, if the screen
appears, press "ALT" P to put PREVAL in automatic cal-
culation mode and figure 2 will appear.
The next screen (fig. 4) asks for the in situ ore reserve
estimate in short tons. Enter a value and press "Enter."
Once again, always make sure that the mode indicator is
"READY" before entering data. Do not use commas when
entering the estimate.
The next screen asks for the in situ grades for the com-
modities valid for PREVAL (fig. 5.). For commodities re-
quiring percent (%), a value of 0.7% would be typed as
"0.7" and 12.5% would be typed as "12.5." Press "Enter"
after each value is typed. Notice that PREY AL will not
skip any commodities. This is because PREVAL requires
a value entered for each commodity. Remember to use
"0" (zero) rather than a blank or the letter "0" for com-
modities that do not occur in the are body.
B11: [W30]
A
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
17-Jan-92
B
Welcome to the U.S. Bureau of Mines
Prefeasibility Software Package
for Mineral Property Evaluations
What is your property name?
Test Mine
Property evaluated by?
12:24 PM CMD
C
CALC
Figure 2.-Welcome screen.
D E
NUM
AQ84: (H) [W4] 'Return to Menu by "Alt" M
AQ AR AS AT AU AV AW AX AY AZ SA BB Be
84
85
86
87
BB
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
17-Jan-92
****** NOTICE ******
The last evaluation was run with the production rate
manually set rather than calculated by PREVAL.
If you want to manually change the
"ALT" M and use the MENU to make
rate, press
If you want to return to automatic calculation by PREVAL, press
"ALI" P
If you want to continue with the current override rate, press
ALT" R
10,000 ton/day override rate
12:31 PM NUM
Figure 3.-Production rate override screen.
READY
READY
87: (,0)
A
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
17-Jan-92
05: [W12]
A
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
20
[W30J
B c: D
What is the in situ ore reserve estimate in short
12:35 PM CMD CALC
Figure 4.-Reserve estimate screen.
B C
Please enter the in situ grades. For
inappropriate commodities enter zero.
Gold
Silver
Lead
Zinc
Copper
Molybdenum
Platinum
Palladium
Nickel
(Enter the appropriate value or zero)
D
17-Jan-92 12:36 PM CMD CALC
Figure 5.-Grade estimate screen.
READY
E
process.
tons?
HUM
HUM
E
tr oz/st Au
tr oz/st Ag
% Pb
% Zn
% Cu
% MOS2
tr oz/st Pt
tr oz/st Pd
% Hi
READY
5
6
The next screen is either a two-part or three-part
screen, depending on some of the answers (figs. 6, 7, and
8). The first part asks the depth to the top of the ore
body (fig. 6).
select the proper underground mining method, or the user
can override any mining method selection on a later
screen.
PREV AL uses a default value of 200 feet as the cutoff
between open pit and underground mine method selection.
If, for example, there is a near-surface vein system that
obviously will be mined by underground methods, the
program can be "fooled" by entering a value greater than
200 feet (to top of the ore body) in order for PREVAL to
Part two of this screen asks questions about the type of
are body in order to further refine mining method se-
lection (fig. 7). Bedded and stratiform deposits include
sedirnentary-, metamorphic-, and igneous-hosted deposits
that display layering or stratabound characteristics. Ex-
amples are Mississippi Valley Type lead-zinc deposits and
Stillwater Complex platinum-group metal deposits.
02: [1112] READY
A B C o E
1
2 How deep to the top of the ore body? feet
3
4 How deep to the bottom of the ore body? feet
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 All questions must be answered with Y or N or a nUTber"
20
17-Jan-92 1 2 ~ 3 8 PM CMO CALC NUM
Figure 6.-Depth to ore body screen.
09: [1112] READY
A B C o E
1
2 How deep to the top of the ore body? 100 feet
3
4 How deep to the bottom of the ore body? 800 feet
5
6
7
8 Is this a flat-bedded/stratiform deposit?
9 (Y or N)
10 Is the ore body massive/disseminated?
11 (Y or N)
12 Is this a vein deposit?
13 (Y or N)
14
15
16
17
18
19 All questions must be answered with Y or N or a nUTber.
20
17-Jan-92 12:39 PM CMD CALC HUM
Figure 7.-Type of deposit screen.
Note: If the answer is "Y" to the first question,
PREY AL automatically answers "N" to the other two ques-
tions and continues to the next screen. The same applies
to the second question.
Massive and disseminated deposits generally refer to
very large, irregular ore bodies such as porphyry copper
and stockwork molybdenum systems, and sedimentary-
hosted gold deposits. Vein deposits are self-explanatory
and if "Y" is entered for this question, two more questions
appear on the same screen (fig. 8).
017: [W12] 68
A B
7
Figure 8 will appear if the answer is "Y" for a vein de-
posit; otherwise, PREVAL will skip to figure 9. If the
"Y" was entered for the vein deposit, PREY AL will ask for
vein width and dip. It is very important to enter values
for these questions because they are crucial for proper
mining method selection.
The next screen is a two-part screen (figs. 9 and 10).
Figure 9 asks about the relative strength of the ore. Note
again that PREY AL helps the user when the answer is "Y"
READY
C D E
1
2
3
4
5
6
How deep to the top of the ore body? 100 feet
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
How deep to the bottom of the ore body?
Is this a flat-bedded/stratiform deposit?
Is the ore body massive/disseminated?
Is this a vein deposit?
What is the average vein width?
What is the average dip?
n
n
y
600 feet
(Y or N)
(Y or N)
(Y or N)
7 feet
68 degrees
ALL questions must be answered with Y or N or a number.
17-Jan-92 12:53 PM CALC HUM
Figure a.-Width and dip screen.
C3: [W12]
A B C D E
1
2 Is the ore strength:
3 weak (Y or N)
4 moderate (Y or N)
5 strong (Y or N)
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17 Answer al L questions with Y or N.
18
19
20
17-Jan-92 12:55 PM CMO CALC NUM
Figure 9.--Ore strength screen.
READY
8
by filling in the other answers and continuing on to the
second part of the screen.
Figure 10 asks about the strength of the waste or wall
rock. As this point, PREY AL is stilI trying to determine
the best mining method, and knowing the breaking
strength of the rock improves the mining method selection.
IMPORTANT! Before answering these questions, read
the next paragraph.
The next screen is a tabulated summary, by mining
method, of appropriate conditions for mining method
C7: [1112]
A B
1
2 Is the are strength:
3 weak y
4 moderate N
5 strong N
6 Is the wall rock strength:
7 weak
8 moderate
9 strong
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
selection indicated by"X"'s. The bottom line is a total that
is used to pick a mining method (fig. 11). If two or more
methods have the same total, the program picks a mining
method based on economics. CAUTION, this screen is
set to a 5-second timer. Do not attempt to enter data or
press "Enter" while this screen is displayed. The program
will automatically continue after 5 seconds. The next
screen (fig. 12) will automatically appear. It summarizes
the selected mining method and offers the option to over-
ride the selection.
READY
C D E
(Y or N)
(Y or N)
(y or N)
(Y or N)
(Y or N)
(Y or N)
17 Answer all questions with Y or N.
18
19
20
17-Jan-92 12:59 PM
AJ9: (H)
AJ
9
10 Questions
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
dep >200
dep<=200
bed >200
bed<=200
mas >200
mas<=200
vein<=20
vein >20
dip> 60
dip <=60
weak ore
mod ore
strong
wk waste
mod waste
strong
TOTAL
AK
CMD CALC NUM
Figure 10.-Rock strength screen.
AL AM AN AO AP AQ AR AS AT AU AV All AX AY
open sublev room & shrink cut & block
pit stope pillar VCR stope fill cave
X
X
X
X
3 o
X
X
X
2
X
X
2 o
Figure 11.-Mining method selection summary screen.
\lAIT
If satisfied with PREY AL's selection in figure 12, enter
number of the method selected and press "Enter."
Otherwise, select the appropriate method, type in
the and press "Enter."
The next screen (fig, 13) the of mill mod-
els included in PREY AL. Select the method to used
and enter the number. To get additional information
describing which method is most appropriate the
of ore to be type in "help" and press "Enter."
The next screen will give a brief summary of the of
C20: [W12]
1
2
3
4
5
A B C
Based on your geologic information:
The mining method selected is:
The optimum mining rate is:
D E
Sma II Open Pit
3241 ore
6482 waste
260 ng days/yr
6
7
8
2 preproduction years
11 production years
90 % are recovery
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
If you wish to change the mining method,
choose from the following methods:
3 % dilution
1
2
3 .
4 . Room & Pillar
5 - VCR
6 -
7
8 -
20 Select mining method number: (Number)
17-Jan-92 01:03 PM CMO CALC NUM
C19: [I.J12]
A
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
17-Jan-92
12.-Selected mining method screen.
B C D E
The following mill models have been for this
spreadsheet. If you do not know which to
type "help" instead of the number. Information wit be
to help you select a model.
Mill model choices:
1
2
3 -
4 - ptant
5 Free Milling (gravity) plant
6 . SX/EW (Cu leach) plant
7 - Flotation (1 product) plant
8 - Flotation (2 product) plant
9 Flotation (3 product) plant
Select mi II model number: (mxnber or "help")
01:06 PM CMD CALC NUM
figure 13.-MrII model selection screen.
9
READY
READY
10
concentrates could be produced than the mill design in-
dicates. This is purposely done because commodity price
fluctuations or mineralogic characteristics should be con-
sidered by the evaluator, not PREY AL, in order to deter-
mine which commodities can or should be recovered. If
this screen appears, either select a new mill, for example,
two- or three-product flotation mills, or change grades
(delete some commodity grades). If "Change Grades" is
selected, the following screen will appear (fig. 16).
The commodities shown on the screen are the only
ones that need to be modified because each would be pro-
duced as a separate concentrate. The precious metals are
not affected because they are recovered as byproducts
within the concentrates. If sufficient numbers of commod-
ities have not been del eted, PREY AL returns to the same
screen until enough deletions have been made to be valid
for the mill method.
C19: [10'12]
A B C D E
1
2
3
- CCO plant: Use for Au ore with high Ag values. Can also be used
4 2 - CIP plant:
for carbonaceous ore although CIP is cheaper process.
Use for siliceous, carbonaceous, or complex refractory
Au ore. Also use for highgrade oxidized Au ore. 5
63-
74 -
8
95-
10 6-
11
Heap Leach plant: Use for low-grade oxidized Au ore.
Float/Roast/Leach plant: Use for sulfide Au ore (tellurides,
pyrrhotite, arsenopyrite, pyrite, etc.)
Free Milling (gravity) plant: Use for free Au ores.
SX/EW (Cu leach) plant: Use for oxide Cu dump leach. Must be
12 7 - Flotation
13
14 8 - Flotation
15
evaluated separately if flotation plant also used.
(1 product): Use for base and precious-metals recovery
(Mo, PGM ores, Cu/Au/Ag, Ag, Pb/Ag, Pb, Zn ores).
(2 product): Use for base and precious metals recovery
(Cu/Mo, Pb/Zn, Cu/Zn ores, all +/- Au and Ag, etc.).
REAOY
16 9 - Flotation
17
(3 product): Use for base and precious metals recovery
(massive sulfides, complex vein ores, +/- Au and Ag, etc
18
19 Select mill model number:
20
17- Jan-92 01:11 PM CMO
(number)
CALC
Figure 14.-Mill model description screen.
09: [\112]
A B C o
CAUTION
~ U M
You have entered too many commodity grades for this mill.
You must either select another flotation
mill or delete some of the commodity grades.
E
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Select mill: (Y or N)
Change grades: (Y or N)
17- Jan-92 01:26 PM CMO CALC NUM
Figure 15.-Caution screen.
READY
The next possible screen to appear is shown in fig-
ure 17. If the user selected lead, zinc, copper molyb-
denum, or nickel as concentrate products, then trans-
portation distance and mode must be determined for each
commodity. Appendix C contains a map and list of North
American smelter and refmery locations, as well as types
of commodities treated at each facility. Appendix D is a
rail transportation system map, included as an aid for
determining rail transportation routes to these facilities.
The screens are identical for each commodity except
D3: [1112]
A B
1
2 Enter in situ grades:
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
17-Jan-92 01:27 PM
11
molybdenum. This screen contains a note at the bottom
stating that transportation is optional because the price
used in PREY AL, and often the quoted price, is based on
f.o.b. mill. If PREY AL's price is used, enter "0" (zero)
for distance and "N" for shipping. If PREY AL's price is
changed, make sure whether the quote is f.o.b. or deliv-
ered cost. If may be necessary to use the molybdenum
transportation screen.
Once again, PREY AL may show one of two possible
screens. One may ask if the deposit is a Mississippi Valley
C
Lead
Zinc
Copper
Molybdenum
Nickel
CMD CALC
D
HUM
E
% Pb
% Zn
% cu
% MoSz
% Ni
READY
Figure 16.-Change grades screen.
D8: [1112]
A
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
17-Jan-92
B C D
The following questions wilL determine transportation
charges for concentrates. Please refer to the
documentation for smelter locations and routes.
Lead Concentrate:
IIhat is the estimated truck distance?
IIhat is the estimated rail distance?
Are concentrates shipped overseas?
01:39 PM CMD CALC HUM
Figure 17.-Transportation screen.
E
(miLes)
(miLes)
(Y or N)
READY
12
Type are deposit (fig. 18). This screen will appear
if lead and zinc are grades were entered and copper, mo-
lybdenum, and nickel values were zero. The reason this
question is asked is that ores have
significantly different mill other
of deposits. Based on the answer, PREY AL will
appropriate recoveries.
The last screen to appear says "CONGRATULA-
TIONS" and asks if the user wants to print the summa-
ry or not 19). If "Y" for yes is it will auto-
matically start the summary me. IMPORTANT!
Check the printer control codes before entering "PRINT'
03: [1.112]
A B
1
for the summary print file. Check the section "Macro De-
faults in this documentation to set up the control codes
for the printer. If liN" for no is entered, it will automa-
go to the top of the summary print file within the
sprea(isheet so the user can look through the summary.
the macro execution is complete. The arrow
may be used to move around the The
spreadsheet map in Appendix B may be used for assist
ance. Be careful not to enter any data accidently while
looking around in the spreadsheet. It may affect how
PREVAL runs. A comments area is outlined stars (*),
at the top of the D (cell E 805), as a safe area to enter
READY
c D E
2 ls this a Mississippi Valley Type are deposit?
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
'1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
17-Jan-92
09: [1./12J
A
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
17-Jan-92
01:42 PM CMD CALC
Figure 18.-Mlsslsslppi Valley Type screen.
B c
CONGRATULA TrONS!
You have completed a evaluation.
now look at summary by
summary or you may print
Print the surrrnary:
01:30 PM CMD
to the
surrrnary.
CALC
Figure 19.-Print summary screen.
D
(Y or N)
HUM
READY
E
(Y or N)
NUM
any specific information about each run. If the results of
the evaluation are satisfactory, send the summary to the
printer. Make sure the printer setup control codes have
been set, then press: "/" for the menu, "P" for print, "P"
13
for printer, "R" for range, type "prnfl" for the range name,
"Enter," and "G" for go. After the print is completed, the
upper Lotus menu will reappear. Simply press "Q" to be
interactive within the spreadsheet again.
STOPPING AND RESTARTING PREVAL
If a mistake has been made, it is not necessary to run
through the entire macro before starting over. The user
may stop the macro at any time by pressing the "Ctr!"
and "Break" keys at the same time. This will produce
a beep and the mode indicator will have a flashing
"ERROR." Next press the "Esc" key. The macro is now
completely terminated and PREY AL is ready to restart.
To restart PREY AL, press the "Alt" and "M" keys at the
same time. This will return to the main menu where the
user can RUN, MODIFY, or QUIT the program. Simply
highlight which function is wanted and press "Enter" or
type the first letter of the function.
MODIFYING PREVAL DEFAULTS
PRE V AL contains two types of defaults; operational
defaults and information defaults. Operational defaults
are assumptions, logic statements, values, equations, and
command statements that are integral parts of the macro
and macro execution. The defaults discussed in this docu-
mentation are kept to a minimum and are considered im-
portant for user knowledge and/or operation. These
"defaults" should not be changed because the macro may
not operate properly if changed.
Information defaults are values that can be changed
through the MODIFY category of PRE V AL's main menu.
These defaults include operating and capital cost adjust-
ment factors, mill recoveries, strip ratios, transportation
rates, etc.
OPERATIONAL DEFAULTS
The printer control codes are set for a wide carriage
printer at 240 characters. In order to change the printer
codes, consult the Lotus or printer manual. Whichever is
used, changes need to be made through the menu in
PREY AL. To do this, get out of the autoexecute mode of
the program by pressing "Ctrl" and "Break" keys at the
same time. Then press the "Esc" key. The mode indicator
(upper right hand corner) will change from "ERROR" to
"READY." It is now possible to move about within the
spreadsheet and make changes. The printer codes are the
first line of the macro located in cell "BEL" To change
the codes, go to cell BEl by pressing "FS" and typing in
"BEl," then press "Enter." The screen now shows the
contents of cell BEL Change the control codes by typing
the new control code information and pressing "Enter."
The codes can also be changed by first pressing the edit
key "F2," then typing in the new printer control codes, and
pressing "Enter." It would be a good idea to make this
change permanent, so press "/" for the menu, "P' for me,
"S" for save, and "Enter." Now wait until the mode indica-
tor, upper-right portion of the screen, indicates "READY."
Printer control codes are now saved. Start the program
again by pressing "Alt" and "M" keys at the same time.
There are numerous operational defaults within the
macro which will not be discussed. Most have to do with
the logic of running the macro, but others are assumptions
and values that are an integral part of macro execution.
Most of these will become apparent with the use of the
program. Some examples of operational defaults are listed
below:
Preproduction years are either 2, 3, or 4 years, and
are predetermined by mining method. Small open pit uses
2 preproduction years. Cut and fill, sublcveljlonghole,
room and pillar, shrinkage, and large open pit use 3 pre-
production years. Block cave uses 4 preproduction years.
Preproduction expenditures are apportioned 70% to
capitalization and 30% to amortization. Amortization
period is 5 production years. However, if life-of-mine is
less than 5 years, then amortization is life-of-mine.
Working capital is included in the capital costs and
is based on 90 days of operating expenses.
Debt to equity ratio is 60% debt to 40% equity.
State taxes are based on 5% of net taxable income.
Running PREY AL under the various State tax regimes
will not significantly change the cash-flow summary.
Salvage value of mine and mill equipment is zero.
It is assumed that the actual salvage value from a real
operation will be equal to end-of-life reclamation cost.
Therefore, reclamation costs are not addressed.
The beneficiation plant is assumed to be on-site.
Smelting and refining of concentrates are handled offsite
by contract services.
14
It Precious-metal transportation costs to a refinery are
minimal. They are not addressed in PREY AL.
At the main menu (fig. 1), some of the defaults used in
PREY AL can be changed by highlighting the word "MOD-
IFY" or typing "M" for modify. The next screen to appear
(fig. 20), shows which categories of information can be
modified by the user. Only one category, COSTS, has a
submenu for further modification of defaults (fig. 21).
Accessing these categories is accomplished in the same
manner by highlighting the word in the Lotus menu or by
typing the first letter of the word. PRE V AL then sends
the user to an area in the spreadsheet where changes can
be made directly in the cells used by the macro or to li-
braries of data that PREY AL accesses.
INFORMATION DEFAULTS
Information defaults are accessed through the main
PREVAL menu (fig. 1.). When in the spreadsheet but not
running the program, press "Alt" and "M" keys at the same
time to get to the PRE V AL MENU. If running the
program, refer to the documentation section called "Stop-
ping and Restarting PREY AL."
AA290:
METBAL PRICE COSTS FINANCE STRIP TONS QUIT
- Modifies mine/mill recoveries.
AA AB AC AD AE
290
291
AF
292 PREFEASIBILITY METHODOLOGY SYSTEM
293
294 MODIFICATION MENU
295
296 PLEASE CONTINUE BY ENTERING YOUR SELECTION
297
298
299 - Modifies mine/mill recoveries.
300 - Modifies commodity prices.
301 - Cost modification menu.
302 - Modifies financial assumptions.
303 - Modifies the 2:1 strip ratio.
AG AH
304
METBAL
PRICE
COSTS
FINANCE
STRIP
TONS
QUIT
- Modifies the production rate (tons of ore/day).
305
306
307
308
309
17-Jan-92
AA310:
01:46 PM
- Returns to main menu.
CMD CALC NUM
Figure 20.-Modification menu screen.
MINE/MILL TRANSPORT SMELT/REF QUIT
- Modifies mine/mill operating and capital costs.
AA AB AC AD AE AF AG AH
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
17-Jan-92
PREFEASIBILITY METHODOLOGY SYSTEM
COSTS MENU
PLEASE CONTINUE BY ENTERING YOUR SELECTION
MINE/MILL - Modifies mine/mill operating and capital costs .
TRANSPORT - Modifies transportation costs.
SMELT/REF - Modifies smelter/refinery charges and pay-fors.
QUIT - Returns to main menu.
01:47 PM CMO CALC NUM
figure 21.-Costs menu screen.
MENU
MENU
IMPORTANT! When accessing a category within
"MODIFY," the macro moves to the appropriate area in
the spreadsheet, and stops executing. Notice the message
in the Lotus menu, which tells the user to make changes
in the appropriate cells, and then press "Alt" and "M"
keys at the same time. This starts the macro again and
returns to the main menu. After moving to the area or
library to be modified, use the arrow keys to move around
to the specific cells. Be careful not to write in other cells
because damage could occur to the macro. Remember,
almost all cells are unprotected. Use the spreadsheet
areas and library diagrams, shown in Appendix D, as a
reference when working with MODIFY. These diagrams
show by column-letter and row-number the total area the
libraries take up.
Tf changes are made to any cell in the spreadsheet,
PREY AL can be rerun with this new information by
15
pressing "Alt" and "M" keys at the same time to restart the
menu. To recalculate the existing spreadsheet, based on
these changes, press the "F9" key (recalculate). Read the
price determination section for more information on the
"F9" capability. Note: Modifications in the "FINANCE"
menu can only be made after a property has been run
through PREVAL. All of the other modification menus
may be changed before or after a PREVAL run.
If changes are made and the me is saved, the changes
will be permanent within PREY AL if the file is saved as
"PREV AL.WKl." Remember this when PREY AL is used
to evaluate another property. The changes made now for
a particular property may not be valid changes for the next
property evaluated. If the user is not sure what has been
changed, the original disk can be recopied to start with the
original PRE V AL version.
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
After an evaluation has been completed and the results
in the print file have been studied, the user may start
analyzing the property for those items that most affect the
economics of the operation; for example, how the price of
gold affects the economics of the property. To do this,
press "ALT" and "M" keys at the same time, press "M" for
modify, and press "P" for price. Now use the arrow keys
to highlight the value for gold, change the price to $300,
and press "ENTER" To see how the economics change,
press the "FS" key (go to), type in "LOOK," and press
"ENTER" This sends the user to the D area that calcu-
lates DCFROR and NPV. Now press the "F9" key and see
how the numbers change.
Note: The Lotus NPV and IRR commands require a
narrow range for proper closure to an estimate. If the
"ERR" statement appears in the summary, the target
percent can be changed to recalculate the spreadsheet.
1'0 do this, go to cell F994 and change the 15% target
number t o another number. Press the "F9" key to recal-
culate. This may also be done for the 0% target number
in cell J994.
Another desirable analysis to perform is the optimiza-
tion of production rate. PREY AL calculates the optimum
rate using Taylor'S Rule, which is discussed in
Appendix A. This rule is a rather conservative estimation
technique and does not work well for certain types of op-
erations. Heap leach mining operations is one example.
The principle in heap leach mining is to move a large
amount of material very quickly because ore processing
(leaching) takes a long time. This modification can be
easily handled through the "TONS" modification in the
MODIFY MENU.
IMPORTANT! When the "TONS" modification is used,
always use a tonnage higher than what was previously
used, never a lower tonnage because PREY AL cannot add
to the calculated mine life. PREVAL, however, can reduce
mine life when the production rate is increased.
PRICE DETERMINATION
Price determinations are another feature that can
be performed with PREY AL. After running a property
through PREVAL, press the "FS" key (go to), type
"LOOK," and press "ENTER" The DCF and NPV area
of the D is now shown. First, determine the rate of return
(ROR) wanted for the price determination. Use the ar-
row keys to highlight the number (cells F994 and J994) ,
and enter a new value. Press "F9" and look at the values
for NPV and DCFROR. If the values are large, change
the price of the commodity being evaluated to a lower
value; use the MENU system to change prices. Next,
press "FS" and type "LOOK" to get back to the DCF and
NPV area of the D. Now press "F9" to recalculate the
spreadsheet. Check to see how close to ?:ero the NPV is.
Repeat this procedure of changing commodity price until
the NPV is zero or within a few thousand dollars of zero.
At that point, the commodity price for the specified ROR
has been determined.
16
APPENDIX A.-PREVAL TECHNICAL ASSUMPTIONS
INTRODUCTION
One of the Bureau's many functions is the evaluation of
minercl potential for land management agencies, primarily
the Forest Service, the Bureau of Land Management, and
the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Evaluations have been con-
ducted over the last 20 years for Wilderness Study Areas,
RARE II studies, Minerals Availability Supply (MAS)
studies, and a variety of miscellaneous studies, primarily
for land-use and long-term planning purposes. As a result
of these efforts, the Bureau has developed several method-
ologies that assist and simplify the overall evaluation
process. These include the Bureau's Cost Estimating Sys-
tem (CES) and the economic analysis system (MINSIM).
The Bureau's latest methodology, PREY AL, now com-
bines all aspects of property evaluation into one complete
software package, and is enhanced by aspects of expert
system programming. Although the software was devel-
oped for Government use, it is also useful to the mining
industry, especially for the explorationist. PRE V AL was
developed using Lotus 1-2-3, release 2.01, which requires
the user to have a PC with Lotus 1-2-3, release 2.01 or
newer. This appendix will outline the criteria and assump-
tions used in the PREY AL system and how they relate to
other industry methods of evaluation.
There are many levels of property evaluation between
raw prospect discovery and development of a minable re-
serve. Raw prospect evaluation requires only identified
mineralization of potential economic significance whereas
property development requires a complete feasibility study
with quantitative values supported by a high degree of con-
fidence. Exploration is the first stage of property evalua-
tion and may require expenditures of millions of dollars
just to fmd one property worth developing. The goal of
the explorationist, obviously, is to evaluate the greatest
number of properties at the least possible cost and cor-
rectly select the property or properties most likely to be
economic deposits. This can be done economically and
efficiently at the early exploration stage if the appropriate
evaluation techniques are used with a thorough under-
standing of their limits, accuracies, and assumptions.
Methods of evaluation vary widely, but the basic criteria
for economic evaluation include selection of mining and
beneficiation methods, mine-life optimization, capital and
operating cost estimation, material balances, marketable
products and prices, smelter/refmery schedules and pay-
fors, transportation, and economic analysis (fig. A-1). In
addition, sensitivity analysis should also be performed to
give the explorationist evaluation data such as minimum
tons and grade required for break-even economics or mini-
mum commodity price requirements. All of these criteria
are included in PREY AL.
EVALUATION CRITERIA
The previously mentioned evaluation criteria not only
provide the basis for mineral property evaluation but also
provide an avenue for more sophisticated analyses. Be-
sides establishing a common denominator for property
comparisons, the PREY AL system can be used in model-
ing applications. One modeling application is valuation of
multiple mine and mill plans in order to optimize cash-
flow. But before any modeling or evaluation can be done,
the explorationist must at least have an estimate of the po-
tential tonnage and grade of a prospect.
Tonnage and Grade
In order to evaluate a property, PREY AL requires the
evaluator to estimate the potential ore tonnage and an
average grade. These are the most subjective decisions to
be made at the early exploration stage. They cannot be
avoided, but can be tempered into plausible estimates.
Explorationists must utilize their expertise to look at a
prospect's hard data, the geologic environment, existing
mines and ore deposits that occur within that environment,
estimate tons and grade consistent with the expected
geologic models and existing deposits, and fmally, adjust
the estimate by property-specific considerations. Once an
estimate is derived, the valuation procedure can begin.
Worst and best case scenarios should also be considered,
and evaluated with PREY AL to defme a range.
Mine and Mill Selection
Selecting the most efficient and economic mine and
mill methods is the most important aspects of property
evaluation. Once again, at the early exploration stage,
SUbjectivity lies with determining the shape and extent of
the ore body, structural control, and rock competency for
mining method selection, and overall mineralogical com-
position of the ore for selection of beneficiation method.
PREY AL has imposed some rigid criteria for mining
method selection by asking certain geologic questions that
help eliminate mining method choices. If the process does
not eliminate all methods based on geologic criteria, then
economic criteria are used to select the fmal method. For
example, a steeply dipping, narrow vein ore body may be
minable by shrinkage stoping or by cut and fill. The soft-
ware would select the shrinkage stoping method because
it is a more economical mining method. Even though
PREY AL selects the mining method, the user may over-
ride any selection.
Mining method selection criteria for PREY AL are
based on type of ore body (massive or disseminated, flat-
bedded or stratiform, or vein), size and shape of ore body,
17
Tons/Grade estimate
Geologic parameters
Di lu tion/Rec overy
factors
Mine method selection
Mine life optimization
(production rate/Ii fe)
Mill method selection
Materials balance Mill recoveries
(products)
Concentrate grades
Transportation

I
Truck/Rai I/Ocean
I
Smel ti ng/Refin ing
Economic analysis Capital and operating cosh
(N PV and DCF)
Commodity prices
Transportation costs
Smelt/Refine schedule
Sensitivity analysis
Product pay-fors
Tax routines
Results
Figure A-1.-Flow diagram for minerai property evaluations using PREVAL
18
depth to top and bottom of the ore body, vein width and
dip, strength of ore and waste rock (weak, moderate, or
strong), and mining rate. Modified or combination mining
methods are beyond the scope of the PRE V AL system but
should be considered after a reserve has been thoroughly
delineated. The mining methods included in this software
are large open pit (>20,000 tons per day ore plus waste),
small open pit ( < 20,000 tons per day ore plus waste), cut
and fill, shrinkage stope, longhole-sublevel stope, vertical
crater retreat, room and pillar, and block cave. Although
PREY AL selects what it thinks is the best mine method,
reevaluating a property with comparable mining methods
is recommended to further enhance the decision process.
Mill selection is left entirely to the evaluator by
PREY AL, but a "help" screen can be accessed to provide
mill selection information. A careful examination of hand
specimens or drill cuttings along with assays should pro-
vide enough information on ore types to select the prob-
able mill method. For example, if the ore type is a mas-
sive sulfide with copper-lead-zinc-silver values, then a
three-product flotation mill should be selected. If the ore
type is a siliceous, carbonaceous, or complex refractory
gold ore, then a carbon-in-pulp (CIP) processing method
should be selected. The mill models included in PREY AL
are counter-current decantation (CCD), CIP, heap leach,
float/roast/leach, free milling (gravity), solvent extraction
and e1ectrowinning (SX-EW), and one-, two-, and three-
product flotation plants. Short mill summaries are includ-
ed to help with model selection.
Mine-Life Optimization
Selecting the proper mine life is an important process
in property evaluation. Once the mine and mill models
have been selected, it is necessary to determine mining
and milling rates. Evaluating a property with a high pro-
duction rate and short mine life may require prohibitive
capital costs. Conversely, a medium-size ore body evaluat-
ed with a 100-year life may never generate adequate reve-
nue. Neither of these examples takes advantage of opti-
mizing capital and operating costs relative to production
rate. Production optimization can be based on several
different factors and vary from property to property. An
underground mine may be limited by the working space
and mechanical constraints of removing ore and waste;
whereas a large open pit production rate may be based on
the cash-flow analysis. Another property's mine life may
be based on market considerations or risk analysis. What-
ever the basis, the objective is to maximize profitability
within the predetermined constraints.
Some methods used by industry to determine optimum
mine life include the 10- and 20-year life plans, the 100
to 125 vertical feet per year plan, and Taylor's Rule. The
10-year plan simply divides the minable reserve by 10 to
determine the annual ore production rate. Stripping of
waste for open pits and mining of waste for underground
mines must be added to ore production for overall mining
rate. This plan is used for medium to small ore bodies,
primarily to reduce the risk caused by cyclical price fluc-
tuations. The 20-year plan incorporates the same philos-
ophy, but is applied to large ore bodies. For underground
gold mines, Australians and Canadians often use 100 to
125 vertical feet as the optimal mining progress rate per
year. Tonnage throughout can therefore be calculated
from this rule (1).1 PREVAL allows for a manual input
of the production rate, but if no value is entered, the pro-
gram default uses Taylor's Rule. The rule is an empirical
formula for calculating optimal mine life (2). Taylor
essentially incorporated all of the methods and consid-
erations just discussed by developing his formula from
actual and planned mining opel ations. The rule states:
Life (years) "" 0.2 x \fExpected ore tonnage
Capital and Operating Cost Estimation
Capital and operating cost estimates can be made after
selection of mining method, milling method, and produc-
tion rate. There are several methods of estimation avail-
able. Detailed itemized cost estimating is not necessary
at this point because of the low level of confidence. A
good approach is to use cost information from known and
similar mining operations or from literature sources.
PRE V AL's approach is to use simple and quick mathe-
matical modeling methods. Cost equations have been de-
veloped based on many actual operations, usually by min-
ing and milling unit processes, and are normally of the
form Y =A(X)B, where x is tonnage, A and B are constants
estimated through geometric regression analysis, and Y is
the cost. Two of the most notable sources for this type
of estimating are T. A. O'Hara (3-4) and the Bureau of
Mines (5-7). PREY AL uses the Bureau's latest math-
ematical cost models (7) . The estimation technique is
similar to the Bureau' s cost estimating system handbooks
(CES), but has been vastly simplified by further regression
into a few equations that estimate by mine and mill "func-
tion." For these capital and operating cost models, the
funct ions are broken down into labor, equipment, fuelj
lube, steel, explosives, tires, reagents, electricity, con-
struction materials, and sales tax. One significant ad-
vantage of these cost models is that the date of costs can
be easily adjusted by using cost indexes. Estimated capital
and operating costs can be readily updated to current year
dollars or area factors can be applied, such as a labor
factor for high or low wage rates. The indexes are up-
dated annually and can be obtained from the Bureau of
Mines.
lItalic numbers in parentheses refer to references at the end of this
appendix.
Material Balances, Transportation,
Smehingj Refining, Prices
In order to determine the net smelter return, and there-
fore profitability and cash-flow, the mineral values must be
traced from in situ ore through smelting and refining to
salable product. Mining of ore always includes dilution,
which effectively lowers the grade of mineral values in ore
sent to the mill. Beneficiation losses are expected, and can
be variable from day to day, but invariably are higher than
expected. Smelting and refining losses are minimal (1%
to 3%) but must be accounted for.
Determining material balances is extremely subjective
at this stage of evaluation. Mine dilution has been roughly
approximated for each mining method within PREY AL by
averaging hundreds of case studies, but recovery in the
beneficiation process is difficult to estimate. Recovery is
extremely variable and dependent on grain size, degree of
crystal intergrowth, complexity of mineralogy, and process-
ing method. Nevertheless, process recoveries and concen-
trate grades have also been averaged from case studies
and included in the software (table A-I).
At this point in the evaluation, it is presumed that there
is a marketable product which can be handled in either of
two ways. First, the product is assumed to be salable and
may be sold f.o.b. mill, or second, the product is sent to a
smelter/refmery for further processing and then sold at
19
market prices. The first method is not recommended be-
cause the sale price of the product would have to be a
total guess. The second method, used in PREY AL, pro-
vides the evaluation methodology to account for costs,
value, and sale of the product, including transportation
charges to a smelter and/or refmery, smelter and/or re-
fmery charges, and the payment schedule for finished
product.
Transportation distance and mode must be determined
by the evaluator and are based on geographic location,
proximity to infrastructure, and distance to a treatment
facility. For short distances, truck transport is generally
the most economical. For long distances, rail haulage is
best. Ocean transportation is also available. The software
has all three modes available, singly as well as in combina-
tion. PREY AL transportation costs also reflect an econo-
my of scale for transportation distance by using variable
rates (tables A-2). Ocean transportation was added for
European and Asian sme1terjrefmery destinations and
includes European charges based on shipment from the
northeast coast to the northern Atlantic coast of Europe.
Asian transportation charges are based on shipment
from the central Pacific coast to Japan. To assist the
user, PRE V AL documentation supplies North American
smelter/refmery locations and the types of concentration
each facility processes.
Table A-1.-Mill recoveries (Percent)
Commodity Milll MiII2
1 2
Gold 92 89
Silver 74 50
Lead NAp NAp
Zinc NAp NAp
Copper NAp NAp
Molybdenum NAp NAp
Platinum NAp NAp
Palladium NAp NAp
Nickel NAp NAp
NAp Not applicable.
ICCD plant.
ZCIP pl ant.
3Au heap leach.
4Au float/roast/leach.
sAu free milli ng.
Mill
3
Mi ll4 MillS
3 4 5
70 88 93
40 65 NAp
NAp NAp NAp
NAp NAp NAp
NAp NAp NAp
NAp NAp NAp
NAp NAp NAp
NAp NAp NAp
NAp NAp NAp
6SX/8N (recovery = ore in dump + SX/8N plant).
70ne-produc1 flotation.
Mill
6
Mi11
7
,8 Mill8,9 MVT
10
MiII
8
,1l
PGM
I2
6 7 8 ore 9 ore
NAp 76 76 NAp 76 NAp
NAp 90 90 95 90 NAp
NAp 90 90 76 90 NAp
45 91 91 NAp 91 75
8For one-, two-, and three-product fl otation mills, recoveries are based on various mineral combinations and
do not imply all of the commoditi es that are present will be recovered.
flotation.
IOMVT = Mississippi Valley Type ore.
llThree-product flotation.
12PGM = Platinum - group metals ore.
Source: U.S. Bureau of Mines Minerals Availability System (MAS) data base.
20
Table A-2.-Tranaportatlon rates
Truck haulage: Cost ($)
1 to 100 miles 0.20/mi
101 to 300 miles .10/ml
> 300 miles .07/mi
Rail haulage:
1 to 300 miles .08/mi
301 to 600 miles .055/mi
> 600 miles .04/mi
Ocean transQort:
Atlantic 22.5O/st
Pacific 24.00/st
NOTE:-All rates are in average
1989 dollars. Truck rates are based
on a one-way haul and no back haul.
Rail rates Include on- and off-loading
charges. PREVAL uses an average
value of $23.25/st for ocean transpor-
tation. The user can override any of
these values.
Smelting and refining costs often determine whether a
property is ultimately economically viable. A small-scale
operation may be on a toll schedule that costs more to
process than the value of the concentrate plus operating
costs. A large operation may be able to guarantee a con-
sistent supply of uniform concentrate and get a much more
favorable schedule. Deleterious elements may also add
significantly to processing costs. At this prefeasibility
stage, deleterious elements usually cannot be properly
evaluated so they are not included in the PREY AL evalua-
tion process. Rather, the smelter and rerming schedules,
presented in table A-3, represent a best case situation.
Smelting and reftning charges used in PREY AL are ap-
plicable for a medium- to large-scale supplier in average
1989 dollars.
Table A-3.--{:oncentrate smelter/refinery schedules
Concentrate Pay-for concentrate
amount adjusted by:
Gold/silver dore:
Au 0.997%
Ag 0.99%
Lead concentrate:
Pb (-2u/st conc
l
+ .95 rwm2j
Au (- .03 opt conc
3
+ .94 rem
2
)
Ag (-1.25 opt conc3 + .95 rem
2
)
Zinc concentrate:
Zn (-8u/st conc
l
+ .85 rem
2
)
Ag (-3.6 opt conc
3
+ .95 rem
2
)
Copper concentrate:
4
Cu (-lu/st conc
l
+ .97 r e m ~
Au (-.03 opt conc
3
+ .94 r e m ~
Ag (-1.25 opt conc
3
+ .95 rem
2
)
Molybdenum concentrate:
6
MOS
z
PGM concentrate?
NAp
Pt 0.94%
Pd 0.94%
Nickel concentrate:
Ni (-1.5u/st conc
l
+ .93 rem2j
Cu (-1 .5u/st conc
l
+ .95 rem
2
)
NAp Not applicable.
IU = 1 st unit = 20 Ib of concentrate.
2rem = Remaining amount.
30pt = tr oz/st.
4Cathode copper sold f .o.b. mill at $1 .10/lb.
5CU smelter/refinery recovery at 97%.
6Molybdenum concentrate sold f.o.b. mill at $3.05/lb.
Smelter charge Refinery charge
(dollars) (dollars)
NAp 3.5O/tr 0%
NAp 0.75/tr 0%
155.00/st NAp
5.90/tr oz NAp
0.35/tr oz NAp
165.00/st NAp
0.4O/tr oz NAp
NAp NAp
82.00/st 0.10/lb
5
NAp 5.45/tr oz
NAp 0.37/tr oz
NAp NAp
9.33/tr oz 11 .82/tr oz
9.33/tr oz 11 .82/tr oz
145.00/st 0.5O/lb
8
NAp 0.12/lb
8
7Platinum-group metals (PGM) concentrate only accounts for platinum and palladium.
8Ni recovery of 93% and Cu at 95%.
Source: Information derived from MAS data base, Mining Cost Service (9), ASARCO Incorporated
smelter schedule, and personal contacts.
For more advanced evaluations, it would be more
appropriate to tie the price of the commodities to the
smelter/refinery charges. In general, smelter and refinery
charges rise as commodity prices rise, but do not neces-
sarily decrease at the same rate. Vogel and Grey have
demonstrated this correlation and have developed Treat-
ment Charge Factors for lead and zinc (8). The following
equations calculate the payment by the smelter to the mine
per dry ton of concentrate delivered to the smelter:
Zinc: NSRZn = [(0.85 x GRZn) - 0.175] x PRZn
NSRZn Net smelter return
GRZn Amount of metal in the concentrate ex-
PRZn
Lead:
NSRPb
GRPb
PRPB
pressed as a fraction
Price of zinc
NSRPb = (GRPb - 0.455) x PRPb
Net smelter return
Amount of metal in the concentrate ex-
pressed as a fraction
Price of zinc.
Commodity prices can be extremely variable through
time and should therefore be estimated with great caution.
One must consider the life of the operation when trying to
estimate commodity values. Although 1989 values may be
valid for the next 2 years, wide fluctuations may be en-
countered through the production life. If a particular com-
modity's price has recently been fluctuating, a historical
review of price should probably be made. The best ap-
proach when evaluating a property is to use multiple price
scenarios that will cover high, low, and a most likely case
moderate-price estimate. PREVAL allows the user to in-
put their own commodity price estimates but will default
to mid-1989 values if no estimates are entered.
Economic Analysis
Property evaluations cannot be complete without some
sort of cash-flow analysis that measures profitability by
relating capital and operating costs to revenues generated
over the life of the property. The general consensus,
within the mining industry, is the use of discounted cash-
flow (DCF) analysis (10) . The advantage of DCF analysis
is that it measures properties, with different mine lives, on
a common basis by calculating the present values.
Discounting quantitatively adjusts for the time value of
money by "present worthing." Discounted cash-flow rate
of return (DCFROR) is therefore the rate of return that
makes the present worth of cash-flow for an investment
equal to the present worth of all after-tax investments.
Both DCFROR and net present value (NPV), another
economic analysis technique, are included in the PREY AL
21
software. The NPV is also an after-tax analysis that equals
the present worth of cash-flow minus the present worth of
after-tax investments calculated at a predetermined rate of
return (10).
In order to perform these cash-flow analyses, certain
fmancial assumptions must be made. Mine evaluations are
unique compared to nonmineral evaluations because of
certain tax considerations. Depletion is the most signifi-
cant item, but depreciation, acquisition, exploration, and
development costs also affect the cash-flow. Depletion
allowance essentially allows for recovery of capitalized
items such as acquisition, exploration, and some develop-
ment costs. The method used in the software is "percent
depletion." The rates vary by commodity at 15% or 22%
of gross revenue, up to the maximum 50% of taxable in-
come plus the deduction for depletion and royalty. Depre-
ciation is handled by the units-of-production method
(UOP). This method is not necessarily the most advanta-
geous, but it can easily accommodate very small ore bodies
with short life as well as large, long-life ore bodies. This
method also avoids counting depletion as a tax preference
item and eliminates the need of determining equipment
class and depreciation schedules. Acquisition and explor-
ation costs were judged to be too variable to adequately
estimate; therefore, they were not included as separate
categories in the PREY AL evaluation process. PREY AL
accounts for acquisition costs through the royalty rate, and
exploration is partially accounted for in the mine capital
cost models. Development costs are an estimate extracted
from the capital cost models and are handled by expensing
70% of the cost in the proposed year spent and amor-
tizing, over 5 years, the remaining 30%.
Taxes are extremely complex for mining properties (11).
There are many factors that affect taxable income, not
to mention the variations from State to State. Many dif-
ferent bases and accounting procedures can change the
tax rates. Because of these variations and the rapidity of
tax law changes with time, it seemed most appropriate to
average and standardize as many factors as possible. Most
of these are beyond the scope of this software's use.
PREY AL makes assumptions, which simplify the account-
ing, and uses averages for the various rates and bases that
should approximate taxes for actual mining operations.
One important assumption is that PREY AL considers
each property to be a corporate entity so that taxes are
valid and applicable only for that property. Because of the
dollar amount of tax preference items available to mining
operations, it is assumed that every property would be
subjected to the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). The
current rate for AMT is 20%. Most of the economic
assumptions in PREY AL are summarized in table A-4.
These can easily be changed if an evaluator considers the
specific case is too far from these standards.
22
Table A-4.-Economlc evaluation assumptions
Item
Federal tax rate
Tax loss carry (years) . . .
State tax rate ... .. ... .
Severance tax rate .... .
Depreciation method .. .
Amortization (years) ... .
Depletion rate .... ... .
Net proceeds tax rate .. .
Property tax rate ..... .
Debt ... .. . . .. . .. . . .
Loan interest rate ..... .
Loan period (years) ... .
Royalty rate .. ... .... .
NAp Not applicable.
Rate
20%
7
5%
2%
UOP
5
15% or 22%
2%
1.1%
60%
10%
5
6%
Base
Income +preferences.
NAp.
Net taxable income.
Gross revenue.
Production.
NAp.
Gross revenue-royalty.
Gross profit.
Capital costs.
Capital costs.
Amount financed.
NAp.
Net smelter return.
SENSITIVITY ANALYSI S
PREY AL produces a complete summary printout of all
the mining and milling parameters, capital and operating
costs, material balances, transportation charges, smelter
and refmery charges and pay-fors, cumulative cash-flow,
year-by-year cash-flows, and DCF and NPY summaries.
Marginally economic properties may indicate that the pro-
duction life is too short, i.e., not enough reserve, or the
grade is not high enough to produce a profit, or transpor-
tation charges are extreme, or even smelting and refming
charges reduce the commodity value to an unprofitable
condition. At this point, the property can be reevaluated
many times by changing the various parameters. After re-
viewing the results of several scenarios, it is not difficult to
determine which areas of the analysis have the most effect
on profitability. The results effectively identify and quan-
tify the most crucial parameters that affect profitability.
Identification of the most sensitive items allows for early
emphasis in the exploration stage to quantify some of the
items. For Bureau studies, it allows for better land-use
planning by managing agencies.
Price determinations can also be analyzed with
PREY AL. This feature allows the user to establish what
commodity prices would be required to develop an eco-
nomical mining operation. After each evaluation is com-
pleted, the prices used for each commodity may be chang-
ed and the spreadsheet recalculated. By comparing price
changes with the NPY, break-even prices and prices for
targeted rates of return may be determined.
CONCLUSION
Mineral property evaluations, when not much is known
about the mineral potential, do not need to be a "flip of
the coin" decision process. Rather, when a systematic ap-
praisal process is used, SUbjective decisions can be mini-
mized and economical and efficient evaluations and com-
parisons can be accomplished. This process can save the
explorationist time and money and fulfill the goal of eval-
uating the greatest number of prospects at the least pos-
sible cost. It also improves Government agencies' land
management and planning capabilities. The Bureau's soft
ware (PREY AL) achieves this goal yet allows for more
sophisticated analyses as more information becomes avail-
able. Thus, the decision and planning processes are Un
proved at every stage of the exploration process.
REFERENCES
1. Wellmer, F. W. Economic Evaluations in Exploration. Springer-
Verlag, 1986, 163 pp.
2. Taylor, H. K. Mine Valuation and Feasibility Studies. Sec. in
Mineral Industry Costs, ed. by J. R. Hoskins and W. R. Green. Ross
Printing, 2d ed., 1978, pp. 1-17.
3. O'Hara, T. A Quick Guides to the Evaluation of Orebodies. The
Canadian Mining and Metallurgical Bulletin, v. 73, no. 814, 1980,
pp.87-99.
4. __ . Mine Evaluation. Sec. in Mineral Industry Costs, ed. by
J. R Hoskins. Ross Printing, 1982, pp. 89-99.
5. U.S. Bureau of Mines. Cost Estimating System Handbook. Ie
9142, 1987, 631 pp.; and Ie 9143, 1987, 566 pp.
6. __ . Technical Appendices, The Potential Supply of Minerals
from the White Mountains National Recreation Area and The Steese
National Conservation Area in AJaska. OFR 12-89, 1989, 181 pp.
7. Camm, T. W. Simplified Cost Models for Prefeasibility Mineral
Evaluations. BuMines Ie 9298, 1991, 35 pp.
8. Vogel, A, and C. A Grey. Lead and Zinc Smelting Charges.
Presented at the Mining Industry Capital and Operating Cost
Conference, Sydney, Australia, June 5-7, 1990. MINCOsr '90, The
Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, pp. 127-132.
9. Western Mine Engineering, Mining Cost Service. A subscription
cost data update service. Western Mine Engineering, Spokane, WA,
1990.
10. Stermole, F. J. Economic Evaluation and Investment Decision
Methods. Investment Evaluations Corp., 1974, 449 pp.
11. U.S. Bureau of Mines, Methods of Analysis and Impact of Mineral
Tax Law. Technology Transfer Seminar held in association with Am.
Min. Congr., June 1983.
APPENDIX B.-SPREADSHEET MAP
(With index of spreadsheet locations)
A Q AA BA CA DO
1
@ , Q 27 't-
A
-
J
-
3
-
S
--;;;;...--...... BS 55
@ LO 50 AJ 81 14 @ B
8S
73
130 f-
260
390 1--
520 --
650 -
780 iA J
I 800
910

1040 f-

1170
I--' J 1164
I--
1300
AO 841'---....;;l2 .. I,
Q 100 ZIOO -
"':.:'" ",,, I
B8
..ll!.
CA 283

Z 243
'A'A
250
-
-
88300
rnm
- ... @
81 323
- AH365
-
Y463
[[3D
W482
-
-
-
-
M 101 0
I

L AI047 -
-
BP 1200
I
@
J
BP 12431
@
LE 1243
CX 1238
1 I 1 I
23
24
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
" .... LlilJl<U J printout of PREY AL run (file:
SUMPRN.WK1)
Summary cash-flow printout of PREY AL run
SUMPRN2.WK1, SUMPRN3.WK1,
SUMPRN4.WKl)
Prices/depletion/concentrate grade table
Mill recovery table
Smelter schedule table
models (capital costs) (file:
MMODELS.WK1)
Mill models (capital and operating costs) (me:
MMODELS.WK1)
Transportation schedule (costs)
Net present value/rate return/interest/
payment/gross revenue (fIle:
AMT.WK1)
Strip ratio table (fIle:
MMODELS.WK1)
11 model calculation subroutines
12 INTRO macro subroutine
13
14
15 PREY AL macro
16 Mine model calculation subroutine
17 Mine method summary subroutine
18 Macro logic subroutine
19 Macro subroutine to adjust number of com-
modities ",..ot-"' .. ,,..
20 Macro
21 Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) schedules
(me: AMT.WK1)
22 (flie:
23 PREY AL macro continuation
24 TONS override screen
NOTE.-The flies for PREY AL are listed in
parentheses. Location areas within the import fIles are the
same locations as shown for PREY AL on the map.
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
NAp
APPENDIX C.-SMELTER AND REFINERY LOCATIONS
Table C-1.-Smelter and reflnery locations (flg. C-1)
Company Location
CANADIAN SMELTERS AND REFINERIES
Cominco
Sherritt Gordon
Hudson Bay
Inco
Falconbridge
Falconbridge
Inco
Noranda
Noranda
Noranda
Brunswick
Trail, BC
Ft. Saskatchewan, AB
Flin Flon, MB
Thompson, MB
Timmins, ON
Falconbridge, ON
Copper Cliff, ON
Rouyn-Noranda, PO
Valleyfield, PO
Murdochville, PO
Belledune, NB
UNITED STATES SMELTERS AND REFINERIES
Copper Range
Zinc Corporation of America
Jersey Miniere
The Big River Group (formerly AMAX)
Doe Run
Doe Run
ASARCO, Incorporated
Zinc Corporation of America
RTZ Corporation
Phelps Dodge
Cyprus Miami
Phelps Dodge
Phelps Dodge/Mitsubishi
Magma Copper
Phelps Dodge
Industrial Minera Mexico, SA
Met-Mex Penoles, SA
Compania Minera de Cananea, SA
Not applicable.
White Pine, MI
Monaca, PA
Clarksville, TN
Sauget, lL
Herculaneum, MO
Buick, MO
Glover, MO
Omaha, NE
Bartlesville, OK
East Helena, MT
Garfield, UT
Ajo, AZ
Inspiration, AZ
Morenci, AZ
Hurley, NM
Hayden, AZ
San Manuel, AZ
Playas, NM
EI Paso, TX
Corpus Christi, TX
Monterrey, Nuevo Leon
San Luis Potosi, Mexico
Torreon, Coahuila
Avalos, Chihuahua
Cananea, Sonora
Smelter products
Pb, Zn
Ni
Cu, Zn
Ni
Cu, Zn
Cu, Ni
Cu, Ni
Cu
Zn
Cu
Pb
Cu
Zn
Zn
Zn
Pb
Pb
Pb
NAp
Zn
Pb
Cu
Cu
Cu
Cu
Cu
Cu
Cu
Cu
Cu, Pb
Zn
NAp
Cu, Zn
Pb,Cu
Pb
Pb,Cu
Refinery products
Pb, Zn
Ni
Cu, Zn
Ni
Cu, Zn
Cu, Ni
Cu, Ni
Cu
Zn
Cu
Pb
Cu
Zn
Zn
Zn
Pb
Pb
Pb
Pb
Zn
Pb
Cu
Cu
Cu
Cu
Cu
Cu
Cu
Cu
Cu, Pb
Zn
Pb
Cu, Zn
Zn
NAp
Zn
NOTE.-Smelters mayor may not buy concentrates. The individual is responsible for determining where concentrates can
be sent for processing.
25
26
E3 H ,OOOmi o
E3 I

3 3
Figure C 1 - .-North Am . encan smelt er and refinery complexes.
27
APPENDIX D.-RAILROAD TRANSPORTATION MAP
3,700 rni -
EUROPEAN MARKETS
5300 rni
... S.E. A ~ I A MARKETS
o 500 I,OOOmi
E:L: H H t:=i E3 I
32 ~ g
3 3 ~ ~
NOTE.-Numbers reference smelter-refinery complexes listed in Appendix C.
28
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
APPENDIX E.-LIBRARY INFORMATION SCREENS
MAIN MENU
"PRICE"
***************************************************************************
Mid - 1989 Depletion Concentrate *
Commodity Price (US $) (%) Grade (%) PGM's *
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~
Gold $350.00 /tr oz 15% NA *
Silver $4.00 /tr oz 15% NA *
Lead $0.40 /lb 22% 66.00% *
Zinc SO.80 /lb HG 22% 56.00% *
Copper $1.25 /lb 15% 28.00% 1.80%*
Cathode Cu $1.10/lb 15% 99.50% *
Molybdenum $3.05 /lb MoS2 22% 91.00% *
Platinum $485.00 /tr oz 22% NA *
Palladium $135.00 /tr oz 22% NA *
Nickel $5.75 /lb 22% 12.00% 2.50%*
***************************************************************************
COSTS MENU
"SMELT/REF"
***********************************************************************************
Concentrate smelter/Refinery Schedule
Concentrate Pay For
Gold/Silver dore
Au 0.997
Ag 0.99
Lead conc.
Pb (-2u/st conc + .95 rem)
Au (-.03 opt conc + .94 rem)
Ag (-1.25 opt conc + .95 rem)
Zinc conc.
Zn (-8u/st conc + .85 rem)
Copper conc. Cathode $1.10
Cu (-lu/st conc + .97 rem)
Au (-.03 opt conc + .94 rem)
Molybdenum conc.
MoS2 $3.05
PGM conc.
Pt 0.94
Pd 0.94
Nickel conc.
Ni (-1.5u/st conc + .93 rem)
Cu (-1.5u/st conc + .95 rem)
Smelter
Charge
NA
NA
$155.00 /st
NA
NA
$165.00 /st
NA
NA
$82.00 /st
NA
NA
NA
S9.33 /tr
S9.33 /tr
$145.00 /st
NA
oz
oz
Refinery
Charge
$3.50 /tr
$0.75 /tr
NA
$5.90 /tr
$0.35 /tr
NA
$0.40 /tr
NA
oz
oz
oz
oz
oz
SO.10 /lb **
S5.45 /tr oz
$0.37 /tr oz
NA
S11.82 /tr oz
$11.82 /tr oz
SO.50 /lb ***
$0.12 /lb ***
***********************************************************************************
u = 1 st unit = 20 lbs of conc.
rem = remaining amount
opt = tr oz/st
** = Cu smelt/ref recovery @ 97%
*** = Ni recovery of 93% and Cu @ 95%
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
COSTS MENU
"MINE/MILL"
F967: (H) [IJ12] 'Return to Menu by pressing "Alt" M
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
G H
Cost Adjustment/Update Factors
1.000 Mine Operating Cost
1.000 MiLL Operating Cost
1.000 Mine Capital Cost
1.000 MilL Capital Cost
975
976 ************************************************************
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
17-Jan-92 02:32 PM
COSTS MENU
"TRANSPORT"
S465: (H) 'Return to menu by pressing "alt" M
S T U V IJ
465
466 TRUCK
467 o - 100 m SO.20 /st mi
468 101 - 300 SO.10 /st mi
469 > 301 mi SO.07 /st mi
470
471 RAIL
472 o - 300 m SO.080 /st mi
473
301 - 600 SO.055 /st mi
474 >601 mi SO.040 /st mi
475
476 OCEAN
477 AtLantic S22.50 /st
478 Pacific S24.00 /st
479 average S23.25 /st <------/
480 /
481
program uses ave value ---I
482
483
484
17-Jan-92 02:12 PM
CALC NUM
X Y
CALC NUM
29
READY
K
REf,DY
Z
30
MAIN MENU
"STRIP"
Z80: (H) 'Return to Menu by pressing "ALt" M
80
81
Z AA AS AC AD AE
82 Open pit strip ratio in the program is 2:1 (waste to ore)
83 To change the ratio, enter a vaLue for waste in ceLL AC87.
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
1
-- ----------------1 2 waste
.-----------------
AF
17-Jan-92 02:17 PM CALC NUM
MAIN MENU
"FINANCE"
READY
AG
********************* *******************************************************************************.*************
FINANCIAL ASSUMPTIONS SUMMARY:
Rate of Return (DCFROR)
Inflation Rate
Debt (amount financed)
Loan Interest Rate
FederaL Tax Rate
Minimum Tax Rate
State Tax Rate
Severance Tax Rate
Depreciation Method
DepLetion Rate
Property Tax Rate
RoyaLty Rate (NSR)
15.00%
0.00% (op costs)
60.00%
10.00%
ALternative Minimum Tax
20.00%
5.00%
2.00%
Units of Production
15% or 22%
1.10%
6.00%
0.00% Commodity InfLation
5 Years
Cost Adjustment/Update Factors
1.000 MiLL Operating Cost
1.000 Mine CapitaL Cost
1.000 MiLL CapitaL Cost
******************************************************************************** **************.******* ******
Mill Recovery Table
MAIN MENU
"METBAL"
31
* *********************************************************************************k*****************************
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Hi II Mill Mill Mill Mi II Mill Mi II Mill MVT Mill PGM *
Conmodity 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ORE 9 ORE *
------ - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*
Gold 92.00% 89.00% 70.00% 88.00% 93.00% 76.00% 76.00% 76.00% *
Si lver 74.00% 50.00% 40.00% 65.00% 80.00% 80.00% 80.00% *
Lead 90.00% 90.00% 95.00% 90.00% *
Zinc 90.00% 90.00% 76.00% 90.00% *
Copper Table 45.00% 91.00% 91.00% 91.00% 75.00%*
Molybdem.ln Continued
------ -->
90.00% 63.00% 63.00% *
Platinun 91.00% 91.00% 91.00% *
Palladiun 83.00% 83.00% 83.00% *
Nickel 75.00% 75.00% 75.00% *
***************************************************************************************************************
MVT = Mississippi Valley Type ores (Pb rec=.95, Zn rec=.76)
PGM = Plati,lun Group [!octals ores (Cu rec=.75)
Mill 1 = CCD plant Mill 6 = S X / E ~ (recovery = dunp + mill)
Mill 2 = CIP plant Mill 7 = 1 Product Flotation
Mill 3 = Au Heap Leach Mill 8 ? Product Flotation
Mill 4 = Au Float/Roast/Leach Mill 9 = 3 Product Flotation
Mill 5 = Au Free Milling
MAIN MENU
"TONS"
AF84: (H) 'Return to Menu by pressing "Alt" M
AF
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
17-Jan-92
AG AH AI AJ AK AL A ~ I AN AO AP
Production rate (short tons of ore/day) may be changed
here. Open pit strip ratios (waste rock) should be
changed through the MENU. Underground mine waste rock
is calculated by PREVAL and cannot be changed.
Enter production rate:
(short tons of ore/day)
*** IMPORTANT a*
1
----------1<---- Enter Here
---------- (cell AJ95)
If you are adjusting the production rate for a
previous run: * You can only increase tonnage
* You ITlJst press "ALT" T after adjusting
02 : 27 pr; CALC NUM
READY
32
Property Name:
Evaluated By:
Date:
APPENDIX F.-5AMPLE COMPUTER PRINTOUT
Test Mine
Joe Proapector
21-Jan-92 01:21 PM
U.S. Bureau of Mines
PrefeasibilityI:!vr.luatiou-5ummary
Comments:
:$ =- ......................................................................................................................... .
GEOLOGIC SUMMARY:
In situ ore re!lefVe:
In situ grade:
Ore dilution: ..
Ore recove ry:
Calculated recoverable ore regerve:
Calculated diluted ore feed grades:
Gold
SilYer
Lead
Zinc
('-Opper
Molybdenum
Platinum
Palladium
Nic"l
Gold
SilYer
Lead
Zinc
Copper
Molybdenum
Platinum
Palladium
Nic"1
1B,OOO,OOO Short Tons
0.065 Ir oz/st
0.4 Ir oz/st
o %Pb
o %Zn
o %'(;U
0% MoS2
o Ir oz/st
o tr oz/st
o %Ni
3%
90%
16,686,000 Short Tons
0.063 tr oz/st
0.388 tr oz/st
0.000 Pb
0.000 Zn
0.000 Cu
0.000 MoS2
0.000 tr oz/st
0.000 tr oz/st
0.000 Ni
Equivalent Value
2.228 Blmt
13.714 Blmt
0.000 Blmt
0.000 Blmt
2.164 Blmt
13314 Blmt
0.000 Blmt
0.000 Blmt
...... ,. ....................................... ,. ........................................................................................................................ .
MIITAL PRICES FOR TIllS EVALUATION:
(Values in U.S. Dollars) Gold
SilYer
Lead
Zinc
Copper
Molybdenum
Platinum
Palladium
Nic"1
350.00 $Itr oz
4.00 $Itr oz
0.40 $lib
0.00 $lib
1.25 $lib
3.05 $lib MoS2
485.00 $Itr OZ
135.00 $Ilr oz
5.75 $lib
tCathode (;u too mill @
(fob mill)
$1.10 /10)
::t; .......................................... :$ ......................................................................................................................... 11:
MINING SUMMARY:
Mining Method:
Mining Rate - ore
Mining Rate - waste
Operating Days per Year
Preproduction DeveloflTIenl
Mine Life
Ore Recovery
MINERAL PROCESSING SUMMARY:
Processing Method:
Processing Rate
Small Open Pit
4937 st/day
9874 st/day
260 dayslyr
2 y.;ars
13 years
90%
Heap Leach Plant (Au, Ag)
Process ReCOYery:
Gold
SHYer
Lead
Zinc
Copper
Molybdenum
Platinum
Palladium
Nic"i
3,667 st/day
3.50 dayslyr
76.00%
40.00%
Concentrate Ui'ade:
NA
NA
73.00% Pb
5B.00% Zn
28.00% Cu
91.00% MoS2
NA
NA
12.00% Ni
tr oz/st of concentrate
Au Ag
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
RecOYerable Metal per Year:
(Mill Product Only) Gold
Silver
Lead
Zinc
Copper
Molybdenum
Platinum
Palladium
Nickel
61,555.8 tr ozJyr
199,370.9 tr ozJyr
0.00 st/yr concentrate
0.0 tr ozJyr
0.0 tr ozJyr
33
....... :::t ::t ....................................................................................................... "
TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY:
(Concentrates only)
Commodity:
Lead
Zinc
Copper
Molybdenum
Nickel
Truck
Distance
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
Rail
Distance
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
Ocean
Transport
Total
Cost
Total Annual Glarge $0
::t; ::f ................................................................................ "' ** ........................... .
SMELlER AND REFINERY CHARGES:
Commodity:
Gold
Silver
Lead
Zinc
Copper
Molybdenum
Platinum
Palladium
Nickel
Smel ter Char ge
NA
NA
NA
Refinery Charge
$215,445
$149,528
NA
NA
NA
Total Annual Glarge $0 $364,973
Pay For
0.997
0.99
(!lee !!DeIter 9Chedule)
(!lee !lnelter 9Chedule)
(!lee !lnelter 9Chedule, Cathode BOld fob)
(BOld fob mill)
0.94
0.94
(!lee !lnelter 9Chedule)
.......... :a, .......................................................... ::t ........................................... ** .............................................................................. ** IU ,. **,. ,.".,',
MINE COST SUMMARY:
Mining Method
Mining Rate - ore
Mining Rate - wallie
Operating Daye per Year
Cost Canponent:
Labor
Equipment
Steel
Fuel/Lube
Exploaives
Tires
CollBtruction Materials
Sales Tax
Total Cost
Operating Cost per at Ore
Working Capit"al
Small Open Pit
4,937 st/day
9,874 st/day
260 daye/yr
Annual Operating Cost
$2,343,586
$<;69,448
$101,282
$781,676
$579,5<;6
$175,978
$132,264
$118,598
$5,222,430
$4.07 $/111 ore
$1,807,764
Capital Cost
$2,119,022
$17,171,448
$453,340
$342,484
$249,163
$97,206
$749,062
$1,125,197
$22,306,921
,.,.,."' ...... , ................ ,. ,., ..... ,' ........... ,., ."., ........... , .. , .... , .. , .. , .... "., .............................................. , ......................... .
34
BENEFICIATION COST SUMMARY:
Concentration Methcxl
Concentration Rate
Cost Canponent:
Labor
Equipment
Steel
Fuel and Lube
Reagents
Co08truction
Materials
Electricity
Sales Tal[
Total Cost
Operating Cost per st Ore
Working Capital
Heap Leach Plant (Au, Ag)
3,>7 st/dayore
350 days/yr
Annual Operat ing Cost
$1 ,720,165
$468,074
NA
$518,083
$1,668,485
$1,386,126
$312,624
$213,510
$6,287,067
$4.90 S/st ore
$1,616,674
CapitOl Cost
$5,777,340
$10,491,221
$1 ,014,517
NA
NA
$1,694,793
NA
$791,033
$19,768,9('14
::t ....................... . .............. . . . .............................. ., ................. c- ............. ** ............................................. n
FINANCIALASSUMPTJONS SUMMARY:
Rate ofRetum (DeFROR)
Inflation Rate
Debt (amount financed)
Loan Interest Rate
Federal T8lC Rate
Minimum TIlJ: Rate
State Tax Rate
Se'\Ierance T8lC Rate
Depreciation Methcxl
Depletion Rate
PropertyTSl1RatC-
Royalty Rate (NSR)
15.00%
0.00% (op costa)
60.00%
10.00%
Alternative Minimum Tax
20.00%
5.00%
2.00%
Units of Prcxluction
15% or 22%
1.10%
6.00%
0.00% Commodity Inflation
5 Years
Cost Adjiistment/UfxUite Factors
1.000 Mill Opera ting Cost
1.000 Mine Capital Cost
1.000 Mill Cal'italCOO ..
:$ ........................................ , .......................... . ............................................................................................... .
CASH FLOW SUMMARY:
Revenue
Royalty
Operating Costs
Loan Payments (P+I)
Depreciation/Amortization
Depletion
Tax Loes Carry Forward
Net Proceeds Tax
PropertyTuu-'
Se'\Ierance Taxes
State T8J11e8
Federal Taxes
Net Cash Flow
Net Pre8eot Value (NPV)
Internal Rate of Return (DCFROR)
CumuhitiVe Values
289502072

- 154368106
-36008564
o
o
o
-1447283
- 5869595
- 5790041
-695269
-11341460
5689Hl8
-23031544 at an ROR of

15.00% 15585462 at an ROR of 0.00%
". ::t: u .................................................................................................... .... .
PERCENT GROSS REVENUE FROM:
Gold
Silver
Lead
Zinc
Copper
Molybdenum
Platinum
Palladium
Nickel
96.43%
3.57%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
ANNUAL VALUE @ the MILL
21,544,515
797,483
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
TOTAL 22.341 ,999
... , ........................................... : ................................................................................................................... " .. .
ANNUAL CASH FLOW SUMMARY:
Year
Capital Investment
Working Capit&J
Gr08ll Revenue
-Mine Operating Cost
- Mill Operating Cost
-Transportation
- Smel terfR<; 6ncry<Jhar8C-
-Royalty
-Interest Expense
Gr08ll Profit
- Preproduction (70%)
-Depreciation
-Amortization (30%)
- Net Proceeds Tax
-Severance Tal[
- Prope rty Tax
-Depletion
- Tax LO<!8 Carry Forward
Net TSJalbie Income
-State Income Tax
- Federal Income Tal[
-Loan Principal
+ Depreciation
+ Amortization
+ Depletion
-Working Capital
+ Working Capital Recapture
+ I ncome lOllS Ca rry Forward
Annual Cash Flow
Year
Capital Investment
Working Capit'al
Gr08ll Revenue
- Mine Operating Cost
- Mill Operating Cost
-Transportation
-SmelterfR<;6nc.,Chargc-
-Royalty
-Interest Expense:
Gr06ll Profi t
- Preproduction (70%)
- Depreciation
-Amortization (30%)
- Net Proceeds Tax
-Severance Tax
- Property Tax
-Depletion
-Tax LO<!8 Carry Forward
Net Taxable Income
-State Income Tax
-Federal Income Tax
-Loan Principal
+ Depreciation
+ Amortization
+ Depletion
-Working Capital
+ Working Capital Recapture
+ Income LO<!8 Carry Forward
Annual Cash Flow
35
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 &
19,762,948 19,762,948
3,424,438
----------------------------------------------------------------.
22,269,390 22,269,390 22,269,390 22,269,390 22,269,390 22,269,390
5,222,4:}) 5,222,4:}) 5,222,4:}) 5,222,4:}) 5,222,4:}) 5,222,4:})
6;zB7,067 6;zB7,067 6;zB7,067 6;zB7,067 6;zB7,067 6;zB7,067
0 0 0 0 0 0
364,973 364,973 364,973 364,973 364,973 364,973
1,314,265 1,314,265 1,314,265 1,314,265 1,314,265 1,314,265
2,730,016 2,282,846 1,790,959 1,249,884 654,701 0
---------------------------------------------------------------_.
6,350,640 6,m,8(1} 7;zB9,696 7,830,771 8,425,954 9,ffiO,655
892,475 892,475
2,844,305 2,844,305 2,844,305 2,844,305 2,844,305 2,844,305
152,996 152,996 152,996 152,996 152,996
70,127 79,070 88,908 99,729 111,633 124,727
445,388 445,388 445,388 445,388 445,388 445,388
217,392 434,785 434,785 434,785 434,785 434,785 434,785
3,351,3(X) 3,351,3(X) 3,351,3(X) 3,351,300 3,351,30) 3,351,3(X)
0 0 1?5,011 655,265 1,238,544 1,135,827
---------------------------------------------------------------------_.
(892,475) (1,109,868) (948,260) (510,034) (152,996) (152,996) (152,996) 744,324
0 0 0 0 0 37,216
400,608 568,253 664,663 670,260 670,260 963,385
4,471,697 4,918,867 5,410,753 5,951,829 6,547,012 0
2,844,305 2,844,305 2,844,305 2,844,305 2,844,305 2,844,305
152,996 152,996 152,996 152,996 152,996 0
3,351,3(X) 3,351,300 3,351,300 3,351,300 3,351,3(X) 3,351,300
3,424,438
0 0 125,011 655,265 1,238,544 1,135,827
-------------------------------------------------------------------_.
(20,655,423) (20,872,815) (2,976,403) 351,447 245,199 228,781 216,877 7,075,155
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
---------------------------------------------------------------
22,269,390 22,269,390 22,269,390 22,269,390 22,269,390 22,269,390 22,269,390
5,222,430 5,222,430 5,222,4:}) 5,222,4:}) 5,222,4:}) 5,222,4:}) 5,222,4:})
6,287,067 6,287,067 6,287,067 6,287,067 6;zB7,067 6;zB7,067 6,287,067
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
364,973 364,973 364,973 364,973 364,973 364,973 364,973
1,314,265 1,314,265 1,314,265 1,314,265 1,314,265 1,314,265 1,314,265
0 0 0 0
---------------------------------------------------------------
9,ffiO,655 9,000,655 9,ffiO,655 9,ffiO,655 9,ffiO,655 9,ffiO,655 9,ffiO,655
2,844,305 2,844,305 2,844,305 2,844,305 2,814,305 2,844,305 2,844,305
124,727 124,727 124,727 124,727 124,727 124,727 124,727
445,388 445,388 445,388 445,388 445,388 445,388 445,388
434,785 434,785 434,785 434,785 434,785 434,785 434,785
3,351,3(X) 3,351,3(X) 3,351,3(X) 3,351,3(X) 3,351 ,'300 3,351,300 3,351,300
0
-----------------.----------------------------------------------
1,880,151 1,880,151 1,880,151 1,880,151 1,880,151 1,880,151 1,880,151
94,008 94,008 94,008 94,008 94,008 94,008 94,008
1,046,29'J 1,046,290 1,046,290 1,046,290 1,046,290 1,046,290 1,046,290
0 0 0 0
2,844,305 2,844,305 2,844,305 2,844,305 2,844,305 2,844,305 2,844,305
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3,351,300 3,351,300 3,351,300 3,351,3(X) 3,351,300 3,351,300 3,351,300
3,424,438
6,'135,458 6,935,458 6,935,458 6,935,458 6,935,458 6,935,458 10,359,897
-tr U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1 9 92- 61 1 - 2 3 8
INT.BU_OF MlNES,PGH.,PA 29516

PREVAL

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PREVAL

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

PREVAL

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ie

You might also like