Acid-Base Crime Scene Titration
Acid-Base Crime Scene Titration
Rojas, Tracy Chemistry Period 5 May 11, 2013 Procedure 1. Safety Goggles were worn. Following materials were used. 50 mL graduated cylinder 50 mL burette, stand, and clamp 125 mL Erlenmeyer flask. Phenolphthalein indicator Glass Funnel
2. The stopcock was turn to the bottom of the burette so that it was perpendicular to the tube of the burette 3. The burette was filled to the top with the 1.0 molarity of NaOH base. The initial volume of NaOH was recorded. 4. An acid was measure exactly 20 (mL) using a graduated cylinder. Then was pour into the Erlenmeyer flask. The flask was positioned on a white paper towel, directly beneath the burette to see the color change. 5. 3 drops of phenolphthalein indicator were added to the acid. 6. The unknown acid was titrated with NaOH by opening the stopcock until there was a slow stream of NaOH 7. The flask was gently swirled to make the color disappear and observations were recorded. 8. When solution turned pink it was reaching neutralization 9. The stopcook was then turn to partly open. Where individual drops were coming from the burette one at a time. 10. The stopcook was closed once it reached a pink color. 11. The final volume of NaOH was recorded.
2
Rojas, Tracy Chemistry Period 5 May 11, 2013 12. The total volume (mL) of NaOH that was used was calculated to neutralize the suspects acid sample and was recorded on the data table. 13. The burette was refilled with NaOH and the procedures were repeated for other samples.
.50 M HCl .50 M HCl .21 M HCl .22M HCl .80 M HCl .78 M HCl .50 M HCl .48 M HCl
Extremely pink Pink Really Pink Pink Extremely Pink Light pink Too Pink Successfully Slightly Pink
Furthermore, the conclusion was based on trial 2, due to having some sort of error in trial 1 of the crime scene. For the crime scene HCl acid in trial one, the molarity was .50M indicating that there was some sort of error. A possible source of error could be carbon dioxide because it made the solution of HCl inside the flask to become acidic causing an increased on the molarity of NaOH as result. Another source of error can be the Erlenmeyer flask because it was not being rinsed at all. As seen in the data, Mrs. Kirkpatrick molarity of HCl was supposed to be a little less than that of the Crime scene HCl. And since the Erlenmeyer flask was not being rinsed it could have caused contamination with the other neutralized solution causing the Mrs. Kirkpatrick the suspect to need less volume to reach neutralization. As a result the total amount of NaOH used to successfully neutralize the solution was 9.6 mL NaOH which caused the molarity, .50 HCl, to be more than the crime scene of HCl acid, .48 M. In conclusion the molarity of suspect A did not match exactly with that of the crime scene HCl acid, due to the contamination.