Concentrated Solar Power Technology
Concentrated Solar Power Technology
Concentrated Solar Power Technology
1/18
3/18
INTRODUCTION
Solar thermal energy (STE) is a technology for harnessing solar energy for thermal energy (heat) Solar thermal collectors are classified by the United States Energy Information Administration as low, medium or high-temperature collectors High temperature collector is also called as CSP collectors - use mirrors to reflect & concentrate sunlight onto receivers that collect solar energy & convert it to heat This thermal energy can then be used to produce electricity via a steam turbine/heat engine that drives a generator More efficient than photovoltaics Heat storage is possible. With current technology, storage of heat is much cheaper & more efficient than storage of electricity. In this way, the CSP plant can produce electricity day and night With reliability, unused desert, no pollution, and no fuel costs, the obstacles for large deployment for CSP are cost, aesthetics & land use Development is underway for CSP projects for around 14,000MW
5/18
VARIETIES
Cylindrical Parabolic Collector (Parabolic Trough) Compound Parabolic Collector Dish/Engine technology Fresnel Lens Collector Central Tower Concept
SOLAR RADIATION
CONCENTRATOR
RECEIVER
6/18
Most optimum orientation Focal Axis is N-S & horizontal Tilting of trough in E-W direction needed to absorb the suns radiation Heat transfer fluid(Synthetic thermal oil) circulates in tube, temp reaches about 400oC Passed through a series of Heat Exchangers to produce superheated steam Steam runs the conventional Steam turbine to produce Electricity. Better for large capacity power plant The overall efficiency from collector to grid is about 15%, similar to PV Cells but less than Stirling dish concentrators Can be used in Hybrid concept Heat storage feasible for electricity generation when there is no Sun. 20+ Power plants established so far worldwide. Largest SEGS plant with 5 collector fields with 354MW generation capacity @ Kramer Junction, California, USA 7/18 45+ Under construction/Announced
8/18
ANDASOL (SPAIN) Parabolic Trough (50 MW) using thermal oil heat transfer fluid and molten salt storage (7 h)
9/18
10/18
11/18
12/18
13/18
SOLAR CENTRAL POWER TOWER 2nd most matured Technology as on date (2 sq mile) Circular/Rectangular Array of Heliostats (Flat Mirrors) Central Receiver mounted on Tower Parabolic Concentrator 2 axis Tracking Heat Transfer Fluid (HTF) HTF temp reaches about 1000o F (538C) Passed through a series of Heat Exchanger to produce superheated steam Steam runs the conventional Steam turbine to produce Electricity. Better for large capacity power plant Can be used in Hybrid concept Heat storage feasible for electricity generation when there is no Sun. 5+ Power plants established so far worldwide. Biggest - 20 MW Spain Seville 10+ Under Construction/Announced 200 MW California, Mojave
14/18
15/18
Appropriate capacity under construction and proposed (MW) > 10,000 > 3,000 > 1000 > 500
1150 93
16/18
CONCLUSION
Of all of these technologies the solar dish/Stirling engine has the highest energy efficiency. (A single solar dish-Stirling engine installed at Sandia National Laboratories National Solar Thermal Test Facility (NSTTF) produces as much as 25 kW of electricity, with a conversion efficiency of 31.25%) Solar parabolic trough plants have been built with efficiencies of about 20% Fresnel reflectors have an efficiency that is slightly lower (but this is compensated by the denser packing) Since a solar power plant does not use any fuel, the cost consists primarily of capital cost with minor operational and maintenance cost. If the lifetime of the plant and the interest rate is known, the cost per kWh can be calculated. This is called the levelised energy cost The first step in the calculation is to determining the investment for the production of 1 kWh in a year. Example, the fact sheet of the Andasol 1 project shows a total investment of 310 million euros for a production of 179 GWh a year. Since 179 GWh is 179 million kWh, the investment per kWh a year production is 310 / 179 = 1.73 euro A study done by Greenpeace International shows that by 2050, CSP technologies could account for around 25% of worlds energy demands
THANK YOU!!!!