Widget Bender Sample For PXT : Profilext
Widget Bender Sample For PXT : Profilext
Candidate Matching
Performance Model Date: 02/04/2010 Printed: 03/19/2013
CONFIDENTIAL
Summary
This report provides a comparison of selected candidates to the Widget Bender ***SAMPLE FOR PXT*** Performance Model. This information will help organize your interviews when more than one candidate is being considered for the same job. The percentage match to this model is shown for each candidate. The percent match reflects each candidate's Thinking Style, Interests and Behavioral Traits combined. You should select candidates appropriate for the Widget Bender ***SAMPLE FOR PXT*** Performance Model listed here and view the report(s) specific to each candidate. Please note that this report does not measure or consider candidates' education, training, or experience, nor does it consider job skill requirements. Candidates Widget Bender ***SAMPLE FOR PXT*** % Match
63%
NOTE: Please consult the User's Guide for additional information on using these results. As discussed in the User's Guide for this product, the results from this, or any assessment should never make up more than a third of the final decision in placements.
Page 1
Summary
The shaded boxes represent the Widget Bender ***SAMPLE FOR PXT*** Performance Model.
Learning Index Verbal Skill Verbal Reasoning Numerical Ability Numeric Reasoning
1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4
5 5 5 5 5
6 6 6 6 6
7 7 7 7
7
8 8
9 9 9 9 9
10 10 10 10 10
8
8 8
Thinking Style
Energy Level Assertiveness Sociability Manageability Attitude Decisiveness Accommodating Independence Objective Judgment
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
3 3 3 3 3 3 3
5 5 5
5 5
6 6 6 6 6 6 6
6
7 7 7 7 7
7
8 8 8
9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
4
4 4 4
8 8
8
Behavioral Traits
4
4
5
5
7
7
8
8
3
3
4
4
5 5
The matching process for Interests is concerned with the top three interests of a Performance Model and how closely a candidate's top three interests match. The three top interests for this model are indicated and ranked from top to bottom below.
Financial/Administrative People Service Enterprising
Interests
Page 2
Employee Descriptions
Thinking Style Scales
Learning Index Employees who assimilate information within expected norms and can appreciate more complex information processing. Employees who communicate within normal expectations and are also comfortable communicating the more complex aspects of their routine functions. Employees who interpret routine communications effectively with an ability to analyze more complex verbal information. Employees who utilize routine numerical information in their work and who may occasionally be required to perform more complex calculations. Employees who can make decisions based on basic numerical data and who understand the basic implications of charts and graphs that explain such data.
Verbal Skill
Verbal Reasoning
Numerical Ability
Numeric Reasoning
Assertiveness
Sociability
Manageability
Attitude
Page 3
Employees who are capable of making timely responses but are quite comfortable using a methodical approach to make decisions. Employees who can appropriately accommodate the needs of customers and coworkers, and also appreciate the occasional need to take a personal position that is different than the group's position Employees who demonstrate some level of independence, but function best when provided supervision and structure. Employees who are most successful when provided ample information to make objective decisions, yet are capable of relying on intuition when necessary.
Accommodating
Independence
Objective Judgment
Interests Scales
Financial/ Administrative People Service Employees who are motivated by administrative duties or financial information processing. Employees who are motivated by a position that offers the opportunity to help others or provide some facilitative service. Employees who are motivated by the competitive, fast-paced world of sales and management.
Enterprising
Page 4