Modeling of Nonlinear Effects in Waveguide Silicon On Simox in Optimum Conditions According To The Experiment
Modeling of Nonlinear Effects in Waveguide Silicon On Simox in Optimum Conditions According To The Experiment
Modeling of Nonlinear Effects in Waveguide Silicon On Simox in Optimum Conditions According To The Experiment
= A
c
c
(4)
Where r
. In
our case, both linear steady and dynamical regimes that the
resolution method best suited to multilayer systems is that of
finite differences. In fact, the heat equation and the
conditions at the various interfaces lead to a rather complex
system of equations. Remember also that the substratum is at
ambient thermostat for heat removal, according to the
experiment. The mechanism of heat generation results from
the contribution of various processes, which are:
Photocreated carriers recombination by Auger effect. The
heat source that results is [1,2]:
S
r
=[ (oN)
3
]Eg (5)
represents the coefficient of recombination auger and E
g
is
the width of the forbidden band. The thermalization of
heated free carriers by photon absorption, which implies a
heating source given by [1,2]:
i
t
i
I
si
e
A
t
apl
S cos ) ( )] ( 1 [ = (u
i
)
(6)
470
m
14 m
V
AL N+
P+
Figure 1 : Modelized structure
Y
Z
X
I
i
I
t
Grating coupler
u
i
Si substratum
Oxyde burried
Si
guide
Z.Al-kinani et al., International Journal of Microwaves Applications, 2(2), March April 2013, 51- 57
53
@ 2012, IJMA All Rights Reserved
q(t) is the time-dependent quantum yield, through a variation
in the number of carriers and that of the temperature [1,2].
I
i
(t) is the incident light intensity. Since the heat sources are
time-dependent, the variation of the number of carriers is
determined for each given time t by solving the continuity
equation:
R G
dt
t N d
=
) (
(7)
(We neglect the electric field and the carriers diffusion). G is
the generation speed of the carriers; it is given by the
following equation [2]:
( ) ( )
i
t
i
I
si
A
si
e
t
t G
cos
) (
=
(8)
Hereq(t) is the quantum yield of carrier pairs photocreation ,
e represents the energy of the incident photons.
When we send an incident beam of intensity Ii on the
structure, it results a fraction absorbed Al
i
, a fraction
reflected R.I
i
and another transmitted.TI
i
. The relation of the
uniqueness is checked (A +R +T =1). A represents the
absorptance, it is approximated by a Lorentzian function [2] :
( ) ( )
2
/ 2 1
) (
A +
=
r i
Max
A
i
A
(9)
Where A
max
=0.17 is the maximum absorptance,
r i
,
represent respectively the angle of incidence and the angle of
resonance, and is the angular width at half maximum of
the resonance associated with the excitation of the
fundamental mode = A 1 , 0 [1,2].
4. RESULTS OF THE SIMULATIONS AND
DISCUSSION
The simulation parameters are set according to the
experiment [2]. In these optimal conditions, two parameters
are crucial for the performance optimization of the
components; that is to say that response speed, the good
switching contrast and high sensitivity, these are the incident
power density and the angular offset relative to the
resonance. To encourage non-linear effects of electronic
origin which allow fast switching, throughout our study we
dont make resonance at t=0. We chose an angle of incidence
0
+ =
r i
, as que ou
0
<0. And progressively as the non-
linear effects that are formed and the refractive index
decreases, the guide retunes producing a switching that
results in a sudden variation of the intensity absorbed.
The waveguide device is illuminated with light pulses of
10ns (full width at half height of the static resonance)
because transit time is very low. Considering an angular
offset negative (initial disagreement), we calculated the
evolution of all temporal quantities such as temperature
variation oT, the number of photocreated carriers oN, the
global variation in the refractive index on
t
that results from
it, the resulting angular offset ou and finally the evolution of
diffracted intensities.
For an incident power density as : I
c
=50KW/cm
2
, it is the
threshold power [12] and for the angular offset ou
0
=-0,1, we
calculate the evolution of different sizes (Figure 2).
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0
1
2
3
4
(*10
17cm
-3
)
Time (ns)
(b)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
(K)
Time (ns)
(a)
Z.Al-kinani et al., International Journal of Microwaves Applications, 2(2), March April 2013, 51- 57
54
@ 2012, IJMA All Rights Reserved
There is a sudden change in the number of photocreated
carriers (Figure 2-b), which results a negative change in the
index of electronic origin one, and a significant decrease in
the value of the refractive index of silicon (Figure 2-c). Then
follows a change in the resonance angle in relation to the
initial disagreement ou
0
, the value of which is proportional to
the global variation in the index, such as : ou
r
=Bon
t
, with
(B=60) [7], the resulting variation of the angular offset
(Figure 2-d) is remarked
r
=
0
. A highly
nonlinear behavior is highlighted on the transmitted intensity
(Figure 2-e). In fact, the increase in absorptance resulting
from angular retuning causes change of the power density
absorbed during the growth phase of the light pulse. This
accelerates the increase in the number of free carriers causing
a runaway mechanism and leading to a contrast switching of
electronic origin. It occurs to an index variation
corresponding to the retuning of the system, that is to say to
the passage through resonance when 0
0
= =
r
(Figure.2-d). This relatively fast switching occurs for a value
oN~3,24.10
17
cm
-3
of the concentration of electron-hole pairs
at time t=15.08 ns.
In our study, the transit time is very low, so we need a high
incident power density for the first switching of electronic
origin, when the temperature increases; we notice that there
is a second switch of thermal origin. This second switch is
not very pronounced and not influent on the functioning of
the photodiodes device as a fast switch threshold power.
After having demonstrated the existence of nonlinear effects
in the structure, we will study the evolution of these
depending on the incident power density and angular offset.
By determining the power density incident by I
c
=50KW/cm
2
(value causing the switching for angular offsets (
0
=-0,06,
-0,08, -0,1,-0,2), we study the evolution of the diffracted
intensities depending on angular offsets mentioned above
(Figure 3).
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
I
i
I
t
I
a
Time (ns)
(b)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
I
a
I
t
I
i
Time (ns)
(a)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
I
a
I
t
I
i
Time (ns)
(e)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0.00
0.02
Time (ns)
(d)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
(*10
-3
)
( on
)
( on
T
)
( on
th
)
Time (ns)
(c)
Figure 2: Temporal Evolution of Different Sizes for
ou
0
=-0,1 and for Power Density I
c
=50KW/cm
2
:
(a) : Temperature rise evolution, (b) : Number of carriers
evolution, (c) : Contributions to the variation of the
index, (d) : Resulting angular offset,
(e) : Absorbed and transmitted intensities evolution
Z.Al-kinani et al., International Journal of Microwaves Applications, 2(2), March April 2013, 51- 57
55
@ 2012, IJMA All Rights Reserved
We notice in these different figures that for the values of the
initial angular offset increasingly large, the switching time of
the transmitted intensity reaches more lately, but switching
becomes faster. We see that for ou
0
=-0,2, the switching did
not occur.
For this, we consider the shift of -0.2 according to the
experiment [2]. We search the optimal power, we find that
for I
c
=400KW/cm
2
, taking angular offsets increasingly large
(ou
0
=-0,15, -0,18, -0,2, -0.22) (Figure 4), there is a
significant improvement in speed. The contrast defined as the
ratio between the maximum value of the power transmitted
off-resonance value and the value of the power transmitted
with resonance also increases. The maximum value of the
intensity absorbed increases depending on the angular offset,
the sensitivity is better.
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
I
i
I
t
I
a
Time (ns)
(d)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
I
i
I
t
I
a
Time (ns)
(c)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
I
i
I
t
I
a
Time (ns)
(b)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
I
i
I
t
I
a
Time (ns)
(a)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
I
t
I
a
I
i
Time (ns)
(d)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
I
a
I
t
I
i
Time (ns)
(c)
Figure 3 : Variation of Different Diffracted Intensities Depending
on the Initial Angular Offset for I
c
=50KW/cm
2
: (a) : ou0=-0,06,
(b) : ou
0
=-0,08, (c) : ou
0
=-0,1, (d) : ou
0
=-0,2
Figure 4 : Variation of Different Diffracted Intensities
Depending on the Initial Angular Offset for
I
c
=400KW/cm
2
: (a) : ou0=-0,15, (b) : ou
0
=-0,18,
(c) : ou
0
=-0,2, (d) : ou
0
=-0,22
Z.Al-kinani et al., International Journal of Microwaves Applications, 2(2), March April 2013, 51- 57
56
@ 2012, IJMA All Rights Reserved
By determining the angular offset by ou
0
=-0,06, we study
the evolution of nonlinearities effects depending on power
density incident (Figure 5).
In this case the switching happens earlier in time, when the
incident power density increases, it becomes less rapid. For
fairly high incident intensities (Ic > 300KW/cm
2
), we
observe a very low pronounced switching, which tends to
disappear for higher intensities.
The curves representing the temporal variation of the
resulting angular offset (Figure 6) show that the power
density I
c
=10KW/cm
2
induces a variation insufficient for
switching, there is not compensation of the angular initial
fixed and therefore not passing through resonance.
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0.00
0.02
Time (ns)
(b)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
-0.062
-0.060
-0.058
-0.056
-0.054
-0.052
-0.050
-0.048
()
Time (ns)
(a)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
I
t
I
a
I
i
Time (ns)
(d)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
I
i
I
t
I
a
Time (ns)
(c)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
I
i
I
t
I
a
Time (ns)
(b)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
I
t
I
a
I
i
Time (ns)
(a)
Figure 5: Simulation of the Dynamic Operation of the Device at
Any Optical for ou
0
=-0,06 with Different Values of the Peak
Intensity: (a) : I
c
=10 KW/cm
2
, (b) : I
c
=30 KW/cm
2
,
(c) : I
c
=150 KW/cm
2
, (d) : I
c
=300 KW/cm
2
Z.Al-kinani et al., International Journal of Microwaves Applications, 2(2), March April 2013, 51- 57
57
@ 2012, IJMA All Rights Reserved
As soon as we increase the light intensity the equation
r
=
0
is verified and resonance passage becomes
possible. This study has highlighted the existence of a fast
switching of electronic origin on the transmitted beam. There
is also a second thermally induced switching which is not
very pronounced and not influent on the functioning of the
device (photodiode) as fast switch threshold power. We
determined the area of operation of the switch regarding to
the incident intensities as well as the initial angular offsets
depending to the resonance.
5. CONCLUSION
The purpose of our work was to study the nonlinear effects in
a silicon waveguide structure on insulator of SIMOX type
with grating coupler in optimum conditions according to the
experiment, the goal being to model photodiodes of fast
threshold. We have developed a simulation model which
takes into account both the number of excess carriers in the
structure and local variations in temperature. The simulation
results in pulsed regime highlight the existence of two
switches on the transmitted beam ; one of electronic origin
and another of thermal origin, the second switch is not very
pronounced and not influent on the functioning of the device
as a fast switch. The parameters governing the operation of
the waveguide Si on SIMOX are: the angular offset relative
to the resonance and the incident power density. We
therefore, determined the operating range of this fast switch,
as regards the power densities and the angular offset relative
to the resonance, to obtain the fastest and most contrasting
switching on the transmitted beam. We can conclude that
these components can be under certain operating conditions
that may interest the applications using laser powers.
REFERENCES
1. T.Bouchemat, F.Hobar, A.Koster, S.Laval, M.Bouchemat
et D.Pascal. Theoretical study of nonlinear fast silicon
photoconductive switch, European Physical Journal
Applied Physic, Vol. 6, pp. 165, 1999.
2. T.Boumaza, Z.al-kinani, M.bouchemat, F.Hobar,
A.Koster, D.Pascal, S.Laval. Characterisation and
modeling of a silicon-on--insulator non-linear
photoconductive switch, Optics Communications,
vol. 241, pp. 61, June 2004.
3. S.Laval, N.Paraire. Non linear optics and optical
computing, edited by S.Martelluci, A.N.Chester (Plenum
press), pp. 21, 1990.
4. H.Chelli, A.Niepceron, N.Paraire, M.Carton, S.Laval,
Photonic switching, edited by Gustafson, Smith, Springer
verlag series in electronics and photonics, pp. 129, 1988.
5. A.Koster, W.Chi, N.Paraire, S.Laval, Proceedings of the
ECO3 conferenc, Lahaye, SPIE 1280, pp. 266, 1990.
6. H.Gualous, A.Koster, W.Chi, N.Paraire, S.Laval, Optical
information technology, edited by S.D.Smith, R.F.Neale
springer verlag, pp. 209, 1993.
7. M.Carton, PhD in Science, Univ Paris XI, Orsay, 1988.
8. A.Koster, D.Pascal, R.Orobtchouk, A.Vonsovici, Alayadi,
new optical functions for optical telecommunications,
Proceedings of seminars specific action, No. 1Edition
CENT, March 1995.
9. AEBieber, DFPrelewitz, and TGBrown, Appl. Phys. Lett,
Vol. 66, No. 25,pp. 3401, 1995.
10. N.landru, D.Pascal, A.Koster, S.Laval, electron lett 36,
pp. 161, 2000.
11. D.Pascal, R.Orobtchouk, A.Layadi, and A.Koster
S.Laval, Applied Optics, Vol 12,pp. 2443, 1997.
12. Z.alkinani, Study and characterization of a threshold
photodetector whose basic component is a waveguide
silicon on SIMOX, PhD Thesis State, Univ, Constantine,
Algeria, 2005.
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
-0.08
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
Time (ns)
(d)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
-0.08
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
()
Time (ns)
(c)
Figure 6: Temporal Evolution of the Angular Offset Resulting for
0
=-0,06 and for Various Values of the Incident Intensity:
(a) : I
c
=10 KW/cm
2
, (b) : I
c
=30 KW/cm
2
, (c) : I
c
=150 KW/cm
2
,
(d) : I
c
=300 KW/cm
2