REACTOR
REACTOR
# 2
EXPERIMENTAL SETUP OF DIFFERENT REACTORS FOR VARIOUS DETENTION TIMES AND OVERFLOW RATES, SURFACE LOADING RATES AND VOLUMETRIC LOADING RATES. BACKGROUND:
The tanks and basins in which the treatment is accomplished are commonly known as reactors. These reactors are operated under different conditions to develop process design criteria. For this purpose flow rates are adjusted keeping in view the quality of the water/waste water and the dimensions of the reactor.
OBJECTIVES:
To study about reactors and terms like detention time, overflow rate etc. To establish flow rates for specific design parameters of the reactors of different configurations.
APPARATUS:
Reactor Measuring tape Pump Volumetric flask Stop watch
RELATED THEORY:
REACTOR: A reactor is any vessel, basin or tank in which a reaction is taking place. Natural systems, e.g. lakes, rivers are the examples of the reactor. DIFFERENT TYPES OF REACTORS: There are two main types of reactors:
PFR (Plug Flow Reactor) In a PFR, one or more fluid reagents are pumped through a pipe or tube. The chemical reaction proceeds as the reagents travel through the PFR. In this type of reactor, the changing reaction rate creates a gradient with respect to distance traversed; at the inlet to the PFR the rate is very high, but as the concentrations of the reagents decrease and the concentration of the product increases the reaction rate slows. Some important aspects of the PFR: All calculations performed with PFRs assume no upstream or downstream mixing, as implied by the term "plug flow". 2
Reagents may be introduced into the PFR at locations in the reactor other than the inlet. In this way, a higher efficiency may be obtained, or the size and cost of the PFR may be reduced. A PFR typically has a higher efficiency than a CSTR of the same volume. That is, given the same space-time, a reaction will proceed to a higher percentage completion in a PFR than in a CSTR.
Overflow rate:
Overflow rate is defined as the volume of water flow per unit of time divided by the surface area of the settling basin. It is usually expressed as a velocity in feet per second. Over flow rate =
Volumetric flow rate:The volumetric flow rate, (also known as volume flow rate, rate of fluid flow or volume velocity) is the volume of fluid which passes through a given surface per unit time
PROCEDURE:
Prepare the calibration curve for the pump to adjust the desired flow in the reactor. Prepare the stock solution of the tracer Calculate the flow rates for different overflow rates, detention. times, surface overloading rates and volumetric loading rates. Adjust the speed of the pump to set the desired flow rate for each of the reactors and specified value of the design criteria.
RESULTS:
Overflow rate = 0.126 cm3/cm2.min Detention time = 241.8 min Surface loading rate = 0.13 cm/min Volume loading rate = 0.0041/min
COMMENTS:
This experiment, we learn about the efficiency or optimum capacity of the pump. the over flow rate, detention time, surface loading rate and volume loading rate of a specific reactors at different speed (rpm) can be found out using the approach as used in this experiment.
REFERRENCE:
1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_stirred-tank_reactor 2. http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Why_PFR_requires_less_volume_than_CSTR_for_same_ conversion_and_reaction_rate
Experiment No. # 3
COMPARISON OF ACTUAL FLOW THROUGH PERIOD OF CSTR AND PLUG FLOW REACTOR WITH ITS DETENTION TIME AND RESIDENCE TIME DISTRIBUTION WITH ACTUAL TIME BACKGROUND:
The completely mixed flow reactor is an ideal reactor. The flow pattern in an actual reactor can be significantly different from an ideal flow. It is important that these differences are identified to be accounted for in the design of water/wastewater treatment facilities.
OBJECTIVES:
To compare the actual flow pattern with the idealized flow. To compare residence time of CSTR and PFR with actual. To establish the flow rates for the specific design parameters of the reactors of different configurations.
APPARATUS:
Spectrophotometer or conductivity meter Different types of reactor Methylene blue as the conservative tracer Pump Pipette flask Stop watch
RELATED THEORY:
The main question arises regarding this experiment is that; Why PFR requires less volume than CSTR for same conversion and reaction rate? The reason that PFR require less volume than a CSTR is the difference in residence time distribution between the reactors. Residence time is the amount of time molecules spend in the reactor which equal to v/vo (v=volume of the reactor and v0 is volumetric flow rate). Let us assume that we design a PFR and CSTR that have similar residence time i.e. ratio of volume v and v0 is the same and we are pumping about 100 molecule per minute to each reactor. In the case of PFR, all the 100 molecules will spend exactly the same time inside the reactor (v/v0). In the case of CSTR, things are little more complicated, once the 100 6
molecule hit the CSTR, they mixted instantaneously and thus some of these 100 molcule will leave from the reactor exit stream very early i.e. will spend much less time inside the reactor (less the v/v0) and of course some these 100 molecule will spend more time making the average residence time the same as the PFR. Therefore, with the chance that molecules will spend shorter time in CSTR, we try to compensate for that effect by making bigger reactors so the ratio of these molcules spending short period of time inside the reactor less and thus its performance is comparable to the PFR
PROCEDURE:
Determine the volume of the CSTR and PFR. Prepare the calibration curve for the pump to adjust the desire flow in the reactor. Prepare the stock solution of the tracer. Prepare the solution of various concentrations of the tracer using the stock solution. Develop a calibration curve of the concentrations versus the absorbance using the spectrophotometer at the wavelength of 664 nm. Adjust the speed of the pump to set the desired flow rate of the reactor. Add a known quantity of the trace in the influent with the help of a syringe. Take the samples at regular intervals from the outflow of the reactor till the concentration of the tracer approaches zero. Measure the absorbance for each of the sample using spectrophotometer and determine the concentration using the calibration curve.
Speed
Time
Time (sec) 0 22.81 20.79 19.66 17.82 17 15.88 15.61 14.26 13.95 12.81 12.82 12.55 11.83 11.56 10.04 10.66 10.91 9.99 10.44
Volume Discharge (cm3) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 (cm3/min) 0 65.76 72.15 78.13 84.18 88.24 94.46 100.00 105.19 108.70 117.10 117.04 123.76 126.80 131.58 149.40 140.71 137.49 150.15 143.68
(rpm) (min) 0 0.000 10 0.380 20 0.347 30 0.320 40 0.297 50 0.283 60 0.265 70 0.250 80 0.238 90 0.230 100 0.2135 110 0.2136 120 0.202 130 0.197 140 0.190 150 0.167 160 0.178 170 0.182 180 0.167 190 0.174
Over flow detention time rate (cm/min) (min) 0.000 0.0 0.071 430.6 0.078 392.5 0.084 362.5 0.091 336.4 0.095 320.9 0.102 299.8 0.108 283.2 0.113 269.2 0.117 260.5 0.126 241.8 0.126 241.9 0.133 228.8 0.136 223.3 0.142 215.2 0.161 189.5 0.151 201.2 0.148 206.0 0.162 188.6 0.155 197.1
surface loading rate (cm/min 0 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.15
volume loading rate (1/min) 0 0.0023 0.0025 0.0028 0.0030 0.0031 0.0033 0.0035 0.0037 0.0038 0.0041 0.0041 0.0044 0.0045 0.0046 0.0053 0.0050 0.0049 0.0053 0.0051
CONCENTRATION ABSORBANCE (Ppm) 0 0.096 0.5 0.18 1 0.24 1.5 0.304 2 0.358
Table 3.3: FOR CALLIBRATION CURVE: AFTER TRACER IS ADDED:
0.84 0.8 CONC. (ppm). 0.76 0.72 0.68 0.64 20 40 60 80 TIME (min) 100 120 140
0.4 y = 0.1296x + 0.106 ABSORBANCE 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 CONCENTRATION
CONC.
t 20 40 20 20 25
Table 3.4
Table 3.5
e*t*t = 702.75min
Graph 3.3: E-CURVE:
0.09108 0.08608 EXIT TIME 0.08108 0.07608 0.07108 20 40 60 80 TIME (min) 100 120
10
FOR CSTR:
Table 3.6: FOR CALLIBRATION CURVE.
CONCENTRATION ABSORBANCE (ppm) 0 0.055 0.2 0.079 0.5 0.125 2 0.396 3 0.583 8 1.471
1.316 CONCENTRATION (ppm) 1.116 0.916 0.716 0.516 0.316 20 40 60 TIME (min) 80 100
11
1.6 1.4 1.2 1 ABS. 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 CONC. (ppm) y = 0.1783x + 0.0445
t (min) 20 30 20 20 10
Table 3.9
0.02643 EXIT TIME 0.02143 0.01643 0.01143 0.00643 20 40 60 TIME (min) 80 100
12
RESULTS:
If the stated settling velocity is less, than more fraction of the particle can be removed whose settling velocity is greater than the stated settling velocity. By increasing the settling velocity the removal efficiency decreases. By increasing the detention time the removal efficiency increases.
CONCLUSION:
Detention time is the main parameter which will specify how much particles will be removed or what types of particles will be removed. Although PFR is efficient, but sometimes it is necessary to have mixing in the process like in rapid missing weve to provide CSTR instead of PFRR, so sometimes priority is based on requirement.
REFFERENCES:
3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_stirred-tank_reactor 4. http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Why_PFR_requires_less_volume_than_CSTR_for_same_ conversion_and_reaction_rate
13