How To Bioconjugate - Read Solulink's Bioconjugation Primer
How To Bioconjugate - Read Solulink's Bioconjugation Primer
How To Bioconjugate - Read Solulink's Bioconjugation Primer
+ 1 858.625.0670
a)
The classical method used to prepare covalent conjugates makes use of the maleimido/thiol coupling pair. Disadvantages of the maleimido/thiol pair include:
b)
The inherent biological function of the biomolecules must be unaffected after modification and conjugation
a) c) The conjugation reaction occurs directly upon mixing the two modified biomolecules, preferably not requiring addition of an oxidant, reductant, or metal d) e) Modified biomolecules are stable over extended periods Formation of the covalent linkage is stable under a broad pH range and at elevated temperatures f) Quantification of both incorporated linkers and final conjugate is readily performed, i.e, they are spectrophotometrically traceable f) g) Conjugation occurs in buffered aqueous solutions, at a physiological pH g) h) i) j) k) l) Stoichiometrically efficient (e.g., 1:1) Fast reaction kinetics No undesirable covalent side reactions during modification h) e) b) c) d)
The aqueous instability (hydrolysis) of the linker functional group (i.e., maleimide) on biomolecules during conjugation The need to protect the thiol group The slow kinetics of the reaction The need to activate the protected thiol group with a strong reducing agent (e.g., DTT or TCEP) The need to activate the protected thiol group by addition of a strong reducing agent (e.g., DTT) The potential for undesirable homo-dimers via disulfide bridge formation Cleavage and/or partial fragmentation of proteins by reduction of disulfide bonds Reduced or inactive protein function
Next
Linkers can be incorporated on a variety of biomolecules, including oligos and peptides, through solid phase synthesis
v v
No electrostatic/hydrophobic interactions
The solution...
+ 1 858.625.0670
chromophore absorbs at 354 nm with a molar extinction coefficient of 29,000 (Figure 1 inset). This unique property allows the researcher to (1) follow the linking or labeling reactions in real time on a spectrophotometer, (2) directly quantify the number of linkages formed in the conjugate, and (3) visualize or trace conjugate fractions during FPLC or HPLC purification. Further increasing the versatility of the HyNic/4FB couple for the preparation of bioconjugates is the discovery by Dirksen et al.1,2 that aniline significantly catalyzes the formation of the bis-arylhdyrazone bond (Figure 3, with permission). The striking increase in conjugate reaction rate is particularly important for the conjugation of two proteins. As demonstrated in Figure 3, the conjugation of HyNic-IgG (1 mol. equiv.) to 4FB-BSA (1.5 mol. equiv.) proceeds to nearly complete conversion to conjugate in 2 hr in the presence of 10 mM aniline (Solulinks TurboLink Buffer). Maleimido/thiolbased chemistry converts only approximately 50% of IgG to conjugate when a 1:4 IgG:BSA ratio is used. The efficiency of the HyNic/4FB couple results in easier purification, significant cost savings, and better reproducibility. Also to be noted is that the efficiency of conjugation of proteins using maleimido/thiol chemistry is also dependent on the molecular weights of the two proteins. For example, conjugation of IgG (MW 150 kDa) to HRP (MW 45 kDa) proceeds more efficiently than conjugation of IgG to phycoerythrin (R-PE; MW 250 kDa). Any two proteins, regardless of molecular weights, can be efficiently conjugated using the HyNic/4FB couple in the presence of 10 mM aniline.
Figure 3. The HyNic/4FB conjugation couple. Ligation of HyNic and 4FB with aniline-catalyzed hydrazone ligation between 6-hydrazinopyridyl (HyNic)-functionalized peptide 4 and benzaldehyde 5 (left) followed by UV-VIS spectroscopy (340 nm).
Conjugation Examples
To demonstrate the versatility and breadth of utility of Solulinks HyNic/4FB conjugation couple, we show examples of the preparation of protein-protein, peptide-oligonucleotide, and protein-oligonucleotide conjugates (Figures 4, 5, 6). More detailed descriptions can be found in the Solulink white papers. Protein-Protein Conjugation Solulink has taken advantage of the efficiency of conjugation of two proteins using the HyNic/4FB couple in the presence of aniline to develop an All-in-One Conjugation kit that allows preparation of IgG-HRP, IgG-AlkPhos, and IgG-R-PE conjugates without the need for chromatographic purification. Figure 4 presents gel results of the conjugation of HyNic-IgG to 4FB-HRP. Note the near complete conversion of IgG to conjugate (lane 4). A simple centrifugation step removes excess enzyme, and yields purified conjugate.
Figure 4. Protein-protein conjugation. Coomassie blue stained gel of the conjugation of HyNic-antibody to 4FB-HRP showing protein ladder (Lane 1), HyNic-IgG (Lane 2), crude conjugation reaction (Lane 4) and purified IgG-HRP conjugate (Lane 5). It is to be that a polymeric IgG-HRP as produced here is the desired construct fro thse conjugates for optimal sensitivity.
+ 1 858.625.0670
Peptide-Oligonucleotide Conjugation The preparation of these conjugates using maleimido/thiol chemistry is difficult to perform, difficult to reproduce, and is low yielding. The HyNic/4FB couple greatly simplifies the process as both linkers can be incorporated onto their respective sequences during their solid phase syntheses. For example, the HyNic peptide reagents can be incorporated on the N- or C-terminus, or internally during peptide solid phase synthesis (Figure 6-1, 6-2, and 6-3). The 4FB group can be incorporated on the 5- or 3-terminus of an oligonucleotide by a simple, very high-yielding conversion of a 3- or 5-amino oligo using sulfo-S-4FB. Alternatively, a 4FB-phosphoramidite for direct incorporation on the 5-terminus can be used. Simple mixing and incubation of the 4FB- oligonucleotide with a 23 fold excess of the HyNic-peptide, followed by purification by diafiltration, produces the conjugate in near quantitative yield. Protein-Oligonucleotide Conjugation The ability to efficiently and reproducibly prepare antibodyoligonucleotide conjugates has limited their exploitation in multiplexed diagnostic asssays. Solulinks HyNic/4FB bioconjugation couple, as applied to the conjugation of oligonucleotides with antibodies, is stoichiometrically efficient and high yielding, converting >95% antibody to antibody-oligonucleotide conjugate (Figure 7). Furthermore, conjugations of oligomers of 2060 nucleotides are conjugated with equal efficiency. The method is extremely mild,
Figure 6. Structures of Boc-HNA (1) and Fmoc-Lys-e-(Boc-HNA). These reagents are used to incorporate HyNic groups on the N- and C-termini of peptides, respectively. and 4FB-phosphoramidite is used to incorporate 4FB groups on the 5-terminus of oligonucleotides. Figure 5. Peptide-oligonucleotide conjugation. SDS-PAGE gel of conjugates visualized with UV back-shadow. Conjugation of two N-terminal HyNicmodified peptides 121 and 122 (Lanes 2 and 3) reacted with a 5-4FB modified 19-mer oligo (Lane 1) to yield the peptide-oligo conjugates (Lanes 4 and 5). As seen in lanes 4 and 5, conjugate formation was efficient at a 1:3 reaction stoichiometry (oligo:peptide). Conjugate bond stability was tested at 95OC in PBS for two hr (Lanes 6 and 7).
as no metals, reductants, or oxidants are used in the conjugation step. Further enhancing the efficiency of conjugation is the use of aniline as a reaction catalyst. In a standard conjugation
protocol, 5 equivalents of 4FB-oligonucleoitde are used, resulting in the conjugation of 23 oligonucleotides per antibody.
Traceable Biotin and Digoxigenin Labeling of Biomolecules with ChromaLink Linkers Accurate and controlled incorporation of haptens such as biotin
In a second breakthrough for antibody-oligonucleotide conjugation, we developed a method to purify the conjugate by adsorption to a proprietary magnetic affinity matrix that allows removal of excess 4FB-oligonucleoitde, followed by elution of the purified conjugate using mild elution buffers. The overall yield of the antibody-oligonucleotide conjugate is 3050% based on antibody recovery. The conjugate is >95% free from unconjugated HyNic-antibody and 4FBoligonucleotide. Multiple conjugates can be prepared simultaneously, satisfying the requirement for the use of this protocol to prepare multiple antibody-oligonucleotide conjugates for highly multiplexed detection of antigens.
and digoxigenin on biomolecules continues to be problematic due to the inherent lack of an internal chromophore on these tags. To overcome this problem, Solulink incorporated its UV-traceable (354 nm) bis-arylhydrazone chromophore into the linker arm in both biotin and digoxigenin modification reagents, the ChromaLink Biotin and ChromaLink Digoxigenin (Figure 8). Spectrophotometric quantification of the incorporation of these chromophoric haptens is straightforward and highly reproducible. Simply measuring the A280 and A354 absorbance of the modified proteins yields both the protein concentration and number of incorporated labels (Figure 7).
Figure 7. Antibody-oligonucleotide conjugation. The silver stained SDS-PAGE gel presents data for the conjugation and purification of a 40-mer (Lanes 2 and 3) and a 20-mer (Lanes 6 and 7) 4FB-oligonucleotides to HyNic-modified antibodies. In the case of the 40-mer oligonucleotide-antibody conjugate, it is evident that there is virtually no free antibody in the conjugate. In both purified conjugates, there is no visible free oligonucleotide. The broad conjugate bands are due to a distribution of 24 oligonucleotides conjugated to each antibody.
Figure 8. Structures of ChromaLink Biotin and ChromaLink Digoxigenin reagents. UV spectra of unmodified IgG and ChromaLink Biotin-modified IgG.
+ 1 858.625.0670
For antibody labeling, Solulink designed and produced the ChromaLink Biotin and ChromaLink Digoxigenin One-Shot Kits , which include everything required to label, purify, and quantify incorporation of these labels from a single 100 g quantity of antibody. Solulink has also developed the more flexible ChromaLink Biotin Protein Labeling Kit, used in the controlled traceable biotinylation of any protein ranging from 20 to 200 kDa in size, in concentrations ranging from 0.25 to 10 mg/mL. Figure 9 shows the use of biotin- and digoxigenin-modified antibodies in a multiplex immunohistochemistry staining experiment.
Biomolecule Immobilization Immobilization of proteins, especially antibodies, is critically important in many biological applications; including immunoprecipitation, cell enrichment, antigen purification, and immunodetection. For this reason, researchers often require that proteins be immobilized on either a magnetic or non-magnetic surface. There are two main methods used to immobilize proteins: 1) immobilization of biotinylated proteins on streptavidin-modified surfaces or 2) direct covalent immobilization on activated surfaces. Solulink has engineered its conjugation chemistry to offer both alternatives within the NanoLink and MagnaLink family of products.
Figure 9. Biotin- and digoxigenin-modified antibodies in a multiplex immunohistochemistry staining experiment. Brain tissue from rats (Sprague Dawley, 200 g) were initially incubated with unconjugated primary antibody against the first target protein followed by detection with anti-primary secondary antibody conjugated to NorthernLights NL-493 tag (green fluorescence). Subsequently, the same tissue sections were incubated with a mixture of same species biotin-labeled primary antibody (against the second target protein) and DIG-labeled primary antibody (against the third target protein) followed by detection using a mixture of Streptavidin NorthernLights NL-557 tag (red fluorescence) and anti-DIG secondary antibody conjugated to a Cy5 tag (fluorescence in the far red spectral region).
Streptavidin Immobilization NanoLink Streptavidin Magnetic Beads (0.8 m) and MagnaLink Streptavidin Magnetic Beads (2.8 m) possess 3 to 15 times greater biotin binding capacity than any other commercially available magnetic bead (Figures 10,11). Solulink accomplished this by polymerizing streptavidin on an activated bead surface using its proprietary HyNic/4FB chemistry. Higher binding capacity permits the use of less solid phase (beads) to capture a given amount of a biotinylated target protein or biomolecule, resulting in proportionally lower backgrounds and cost.
Figure 11. Comparison of free biotin binding capacity of Solulinks NanoLink and MagnaLink streptavidin-coated magnetic beads and competitor beads.
Figure 10. Comparison of magnetic beads. MagnaLink and NanoLink Streptavidin Magnetic beads and their corresponding solution phase image (light microscope 400x).
Figure 12. Scheme presenting the chemistry used to convalently immobilize HyNic-proteins on 4FB beads.
+ 1 858.625.0670
Direct Immobilization Current methods to covalently immobilize proteins on magnetic and non-magnetic surfaces are similar in that chemically reactive surfaces such as epoxy, tosyl , or NHS functional groups are mixed with biomolecules in anticipation that lysine groups located on the protein surface will covalently bind to the activated surface. There are several problems associated with this paradigm, as immobilization which is directed to lysine groups on proteins is uncontrolled, leading to over-modification and loss of protein function. In addition, for each protein to be immobilized, pH and protein levels must be optimized on a case-by-case basis to ensure optimal functionality. . It is well known that protein immobilization efficiency using these chemistries is often low and can be accompanied by significant amounts of nonspecific binding and/or leaching. These limitations lead to suboptimal assay performance and reproducibility. Solulink has overcome many of these problems by offering an immobilization technology that is highly efficient and reproducible. Solulinks protocols differ (Figure 12) in that the protein to be immobilized is first controllably and reproducibly modified with HyNic groups, then the HyNic-modified protein (or peptide) is simply mixed with a 4FB-activated surface. In this way, protein immobilization efficiency consistently exceeds 75%, with unmatched batch-to-batch reproducibility.
Summary Solulinks HyNic/4FB-based bioconjugation technology has been engineered to efficiently prepare all types of biomolecular conjugates. In most cases, Solulinks conjugation technology is far superior to classical methods and better satisfies the stringent requirements demanded by diagnostic and therapeutic products. As a case in point, Solulinks oligonucleotide-antibody conjugation technology was used during the development of the PCR-based Proximity Ligation Assay8, 17, 20 that is recognized as the most sensitive protein detection assay.
10
8.
Multiplexed Proximity Ligation Assays to Profile Putative Plasma Biomarkers Relevant to Pancreatic and Ovarian Cancer. Clin Chem 54:582-589. 9. Liu G, Dou S, Rusckowski M et al. (2008) An experimental means of viral antigen identification: Improved detection of avian influenza viruses by proximity ligation. J Virol Methods v163, I 1:116-122. 2. Dirksen A and Dawson PE (2008) Rapid Oxime and
and theoretical evaluation of the influence of pretargeting antibody on the tumor accumulation of effector. Mol Cancer Ther 7:1025-1032. 10. 3. Ma Z, Li Q, An H et al. (2009) Targeting HER signaling with Neuregulins Heparin-binding Domain. J Biol Chem 13:284(46):32108-15 Epub Aug 28. 4. Hansen RR, Johnson LM, Bowman CN (2009) Visual, Sharma S, Dominguez AL, Manrique SZ et al. (2008) Hydrazone Ligations with Aromatic Aldehydes for Biomolecular Labeling. Bioconjugate Chem 19:2543-2548.
Systemic targeting of CpG-ODN to the tumor microenvironment with anti-neu-CpG hybrid molecule and T regulatory cell depletion induces memory responses in BALB-neuT tolerant mice. Cancer Res 15;68(18):7530-40. 11. Chaturvedi A, Dorward D, Pierce SK (2008) The B Cell
base-specific detection of nucleic acid hybridization using polymerization-based amplification. Anal Biochem v386, I. 2:285-287. 5. Kwong GA, Radu CG, Hwang K et al. (2009) Modular Nucleic
Receptor Governs the Subcellular Location of Toll-like Receptor 9 Leading to Hyperresponses to DNA-Containing Antigens. Immunity v28, I. 6:799-809. 12. Faintuch BL, Teodoro R, Duatti A et al. (2008)
Acid Assembled p/MHC Microarrays for Multiplexed Sorting of Antigen-Specific T Cells. J Am Chem Soc 131 (28):96959703. 6. Sharma S, Dominguez A, Manrique S et al. (2008) Systemic
Radiolabeled bombesin analogs for prostate cancer diagnosis: preclinical studies. Nucl Med Bio v35, I. 4:401-411. 13. Liu G, Dou S, Yin D et al. (2007) A Novel Pretargeting
Targeting of CpG-ODN to the Tumor Microenvironment with Anti-neu-CpG Hybrid Molecule and T Regulatory Cell Depletion Induces Memory Responses in BALB-neuT Tolerant Mice. Cancer Res 68(18): 7530-40. 7. Sikes D, Hansen R, Johnson L et al. (2008) Using polymeric
Method for Measuring Antibody Internalization in Tumor Cells. Cancer Biother Radio 22:33-39. 14. Levashova Z, Backer J, Backer M et al. (2007) Direct
materials to generate anamplified response to molecular recognition events. Nat Mater 7:52-6.
labeling of single-chain VEGF (sc-VEGF) with Tc99m. J Nucl Med 48 (Supplement 2) 181P.
11
+ 1 858.625.0670
15.
23.
and reversible disruption of the blood-testis barrier by an FSH mutant-occludin peptide conjugate. FASEB J 21:438. 16. Darmanis S, Khler A, Spngberg L et al. (2007) Self-
Catalysis of Hydrazone Formation and Transimination: Implications for Dynamic Covalent Chemistry. J Am Chem Soc 128:15602-3. 24. Dirksen A, Hackeng TM, Dawson PE (2006) Nucleophilic
assembly of proximity probes for flexible and modular proximity ligation assays. Biotechniques 43:443-450.
Catalysis of Oxime Ligation. Angew Chem Int Ed 45:7581-7584. 25. Schallmeiner E, Oksanen E, Ericsson O et al. (2006) Sensitive
17.
protein detection via triple-binder proximity ligation assays. Nat Methods 4:135-137. 26. Buhl A, Metzger JH, Heegaard NHH et al. (2006) Novel
protein detection by proximity ligation for cancer biomarker validation. Nat Methods 4:327. 18. He J, Liu G, Dou S et al. (2007) An improved method
Biosensor-Based Analytic Device for the Detection of Anti-DoubleStranded DNA Antibodies. Clin Chem 10:1373. 27. Dadachova E, Moadel T, Schweitzer AD et al. (2006)
for covalently conjugating morpholino oligomers to antitumor antibodies. Bioconjugate Chem 18:983-8. 19. Vardar-Schara G, Krab I, Yi G et al. (2007) A
Radiolabeled Melanin-Binding Peptides Are Safe and Effective in Treatment of Human Pigmented Melanoma in a Mouse Model of Disease. Cancer Biother Radio 21:117-129. 28. Wong CH, Mruk DD, Lee WM et al. (2006) Targeted and
homogeneous fluorometric assay platform based on novel synthetic proteins. Biochem Biophy Res Co 361:103-108. 20. Jarvius M, Paulsson J, Weibrecht I et al. (2007) In situ
detection of phosphorylated PDGF receptor using a generalized proximity ligation method. Mol Cell Proteomics 6:1500-9. 21. Rennen HJ, Laverman P, van Eerd JE et al. (2007) PET
reversible disruption of the blood-testis barrier by an FSH mutantoccludin peptide conjugate. FASEB J 10:1096. 29. Kubler-Kielb J, Liu TY, Mocca C et al. (2006) Additional
imaging of infection with a HYNIC-conjugated LTB4 antagonist labeled with F-18 via hydrazone formation. Nucl Med Biol v34, I. 6:691-695.
Conjugation Methods and Immunogenicity of Bacillus anthracis Poly-D-Glutamic Acid-Protein Conjugates. Infect Immun 74:4744-4749. 30. Nakamoto K, Wang S, Jenison RD et al. (2006) Linkage
22.
disequilibrium blocks, haplotype structure, and htSNPs of human CYP7A1 gene. BMC Genetics 7:29.
Encoded Antibody Libraries: A Unified Platform for Multiplexed Cell Sorting and Detection of Genes and Proteins. J Amer Chem Soc 129:1959-1967.
12
31.
Acid), Tricine, and Nicotinic Acid, Synthesis and Reactivity. Inorganic, Metal-Organic, and Nano-Metal Chemistry 35:43. 39. Zhong X, Leng L, Beitin A et al. (2005) Simultaneous
Synthetic Modification of Silica Beads That Allows for Sequential Attachment of Two Different Oligonucleotides. Bioconjugate Chem 17:841-848. 32. Liu G, Dou S, He J et al. (2006) Radiolabeling of MAG3-
detection of microsatellite repeatsand SNPs in the macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) gene by thin-film biosensor chips and application to rural field studies. Nuc Acids Res 33:e121. 40. Walker GF, Fella C, Pelisek J et al. (2005) Toward
morpholino oligomers with 188Re at high labeling efficiency and specific radioactivity for tumor pretargeting. Appl Radiat Isotopes 64:971. 33. Liu G, Dou S, Mardirossian G et al. (2006) Successful
Synthetic Viruses: Endosomal pH-Triggered Deshielding of Targeted Polyplexes Greatly Enhances Gene Transfer in vitro and in vivo. Molec Ther 11:418425. 41. Daftarian P, Sharan R, Haq W et al. (2005) Novel
Radiotherapy of Tumor in Pretargeted Mice by 188ReRadiolabeled Phosphorodiamidate Morpholino Oligomer, a Synthetic DNA Analogue. Clin Cancer Res 12:4958. 34. Decristoforo C, Faintuch-Linkowski B, Rey A et al. (2006)
conjugates of epitope fusion peptides with CpG-ODN display enhanced immunogenicity and HIV recognition. Vaccine v23, I. 26:3453-3468. 42. 35. Lee Y, Jeong JM, Kim HW et al. (2006) An improved Achilles K and Kiedrowski GV (2005) Kinetic model
[99mTc]HYNIC-RGD for imaging integrin v3 expression. Nucl Med Bio v33 I. 8:945-952.
studies on the chemical ligation of oligonucleotides via hydrazone formation. Bioorg Med Chem Lett v15, I. 4:1229-1233. 43. Kozlov IA, Melnyk PC, Stromsborg KE et al. (2004)
method of 18F peptide labeling: hydrazone formation with HYNIC-conjugated c(RGDyK). Nucl Med Biol, v33 I. 5:677-683. 36. Achilles K and Kiedrowski V (2005) Kinetic model studies
Efficient Strategies for the Conjugation of Oligonucleoitdes to Antibodies Enabling Highly Sensitive Protein Detection. Biopolymers 73:621-30. 44. Chen Y. Aveyard J, Wilson R (2004) Gold and
on the chemical ligation of oligonucleotides via hydrazone formation. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 15:3806. 37. Kline MC, Duewer DL, Redman JW et al. (2004) Results
from the NIST 2004 DNA Quantitation Study. J Forensic Sci 50:1. 38. Faintuch BL, Santos RLSR, Souza ALFM et al. (2005)
silver nanoparticles functionalized with known numbers of oligonucleotides per particle for DNA detection. Chem Commun 2804-2805.
13
+ 1 858.625.0670
45.
polymorphism genotyping on optical thin-film biosensor chips. P Natl Acad Sci USA 100:11559-11564. 46. Hartmann DM, Heller M, Esener SC et al. (2002) Selective
DNA attachment of micro- and nanoscale particles to substrates. J Mater Res 17:473- 478. 47. Graham KAN, Wang Q, Eisenhut M et al. (2002) A general
method for functionalizing both the C- and N-terminals of Tyr3octreotate. Tetrahedron Lett v43, I. 29:5021-5024.
14