AAB - Example Problems Handout
AAB - Example Problems Handout
James A Swanson
Associate Professor
University of Cincinnati
Dept of Civil & Env. Engineering
765 Baldwin Hall
Cincinnati, OH 45221-0071
Ph: (513) 556-3774
Fx: (513) 556-2599
[email protected]
9 (typ)
3'-0"
3'-0"
References:
Barth, K.E., Hartnagel, B.A., White, D.W., and Barker, M.G., 2004, Recommended Procedures for
Simplified Inelastic Design of Steel I-Girder Bridges, ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, May/June
Vol. 9, No. 3
Four LRFD Design Examples of Steel Highway Bridges, Vol. II, Chapter 1A Highway Structures
Design Handbook, Published by American Iron and Steel Institute in cooperation with HDR Engineering,
Inc. Available at http://www.aisc.org/
2- Span Continuous Bridge Example
ODOT LRFD Short Course - Steel
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 1 of 62
-- 1 --
2. LOAD CALCULATIONS:
DC dead loads (structural components) include:
Steel girder self weight (DC1)
Concrete deck self weight (DC1)
Haunch self weight (DC1)
Barrier walls (DC2)
DW dead loads (structural attachments) include:
Wearing surface (DW)
2 490
pcf
12 inft
(1.15 ) = 278.1 ft
Lb
per girder
490 pcf
12 inft
(1.15 ) = 439.5
Lb
ft
per girder
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 2 of 62
-- 2 --
Wdeck
150 pcf
= (9.5")(144")
2
12 inft
Lb
= 1, 425 ft per girder
Whaunch
( 2")( 25.2")
Lb
=
2
(150 pcf ) = 52.5 ft per girder
in
12 ft
4
girders
Wbarriers =
W fws =
(39')(60 psf )
4 girders
= 585 Lb
per girder
ft
The moment effect due to dead loads was found using an FE model composed of four frame elements.
This data was input into Excel to be combined with data from moving live load analyses performed in
SAP 2000. DC1 dead loads were applied to the non-composite section (bare steel). All live loads were
applied to the short-term composite section (1n = 8). DW (barriers) and DC2 (wearing surface) dead
loads were applied to the long-term composite section (3n = 24).
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 3 of 62
-- 3 --
3,000
2,000
DW
1,000
Moment (kip-ft)
0
DC2
-1,000
-2,000
-3,000
-4,000
-5,000
-6,000
-7,000
-8,000
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
Station (ft)
150
100
DW
Shear (kip)
50
DC2
-50
-100
-150
-200
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
Station (ft)
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 4 of 62
-- 4 --
The following Dead Load results were obtained from the FE analysis:
The maximum positive live-load moments occur at stations 58.7 and 271.3
The maximum negative live-load moments occur over the center support at station 165.0
DC1 - Steel:
DC1 - Deck:
DC1 - Haunch:
DC1 - Total:
DC2:
DW
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 5 of 62
-- 5 --
1) The effect of a design tandem combined with the effect of the lane loading. The design
tandem consists of two 25kip axles spaced 4.0 apart. The lane loading consists of a 0.64klf
uniform load on all spans of the bridge. (HL-93M in SAP)
2) The effect of one design truck with variable axle spacing combined with the effect of the
0.64klf lane loading. (HL-93K in SAP)
3) For negative moment between points of contraflexure only: 90% of the effect of a truck-train
combined with 90% of the effect of the lane loading. The truck train consists of two design
trucks (shown below) spaced a minimum of 50 between the lead axle of one truck and the rear
axle of the other truck. The distance between the two 32kip axles should be taken as 14 for each
truck. The points of contraflexure were taken as the field splices at 132 and 198 from the left
end of the bridge. (HL-93S in SAP)
4) The effect of one design truck with fixed axle spacing used for fatigue loading.
All live load calculations were performed in SAP 2000 using a beam line analysis. The nominal
moment data from SAP was then input into Excel. An Impact Factor of 1.33 was applied to the
truck and tandem loads and an impact factor of 1.15 was applied to the fatigue loads within SAP.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 6 of 62
-- 6 --
Single Truck
4,000
Tandem
Moment (kip-ft)
2,000
Fatigue
0
Fatigue
Tandem
-2,000
Contraflexure Point
Contraflexure Point
-4,000
Single Truck
Two Trucks
-6,000
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
270
300
330
Station (ft)
150
Tandem
100
Fatigue
Shear (kip)
50
-50
-100
-150
-200
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
Station (ft)
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 7 of 62
-- 7 --
The following Live Load results were obtained from the SAP analysis:
The maximum positive live-load moments occur at stations 73.3 and 256.7
The maximum negative live-load moments occur over the center support at station 165.0
HL-93M
HL-93K
HL-93S
Fatigue
Before proceeding, these live-load moments will be confirmed with an influence line analysis.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 8 of 62
-- 8 --
25kip
Tandem:
32kip 32kip
8kip
Single Truck:
0.640kip/ft
Lane:
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
105
120
135
150
165
180
195
210
225
240
255
270
285
300
315
330
Station (ft)
Tandem:
Single Truck:
Lane Load:
kip
k-ft
kip
kip
kip
k-ft
k-ft
kip
kip
k-ft
kip
kip
k-ft
k-ft
kip
k-ft
k-ft
kip
k-ft
kip
(IM)(Tandem) + Lane:
(1.33 ) ( 2,108
k-ft
k-ft
) + 1,594
k-ft
) + 1,594
k-ft
= 3,726
k-ft
= 4,397
k-ft
GOVERNS
The case of two trucks is not considered here because it is only used when computing negative moments.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 9 of 62
-- 9 --
25kip
Tandem:
32kip 32kip
8kip
Single Truck:
32kip 32kip
32kip 32kip
8kip
8kip
Two Trucks:
0.640kip/ft
Lane:
Station (ft)
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
105
120
135
150
165
180
195
210
225
240
255
270
285
300
315
330
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
Tandem:
Single Truck:
kip
k-ft
k-ft
kip
kip
kip
k-ft
kip
k-ft
kip
k-ft
kip
kip
k-ft
kip
kip
k-ft
kip
kip
kip
k-ft
ft
k-ft
kip
k-ft
k-ft
kip
k-ft
kip
(IM)(Tandem) + Lane:
(1.33 ) ( 924.0
(1.33 ) (1,318
kip
k-ft
k-ft
kip
kip
Lane Load:
k-ft
kip
Two Trucks:
kip
k-ft
k-ft
k-ft
) + 2,508
) + 2,508
k-ft
k-ft
k-ft
= 3,737
k-ft
= 4, 261
) + 2,508
k-ft
k-ft
= 5, 405k-ft GOVERNS
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 10 of 62
-- 10 --
Based on the influence line analysis, we can say that the moments obtained from SAP appear to be
reasonable and will be used for design.
Before these Service moments can be factored and combined, we must compute the distribution factors.
Since the distribution factors are a function of Kg, the longitudinal stiffness parameter, we must first
compute the sections properties of the girders.
kip
kip
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 11 of 62
-- 11 --
A centrifugal force results when a vehicle turns on a structure. Although a centrifugal force doesnt apply
to this bridge since it is straight, the centrifugal load that would result from a hypothetical horizontal
curve will be computed to illustrate the procedure.
The centrifugal force is computed as the product of the axle loads and the factor, C.
C= f
v2
gR
(3.6.3-1)
where:
( secft )
- 4/3 for all load combinations except for Fatigue, in which case it is 1.0
( )
ft
sec 2
Suppose that we have a radius of R = 600 and a design speed of v = 65mph = 95.33ft/sec.
ft 2
4 ( 95.33 sec )
= 0.6272
C =
3 32.2 secft 2 ( 600 ')
The centrifugal force acts horizontally in the direction pointing away from the center of curvature and at a
height of 6 above the deck. Design the cross frames at the supports to carry this horizontal force into the
bearings and design the bearings to resist the horizontal force and the resulting overturning moment.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 12 of 62
-- 12 --
For the calculation of wind loads, assume that the bridge is located in the open country at an elevation
of 40 above the ground.
Take Z = 40
V o = 8.20mph
Z o = 0.23ft
Open Country
V
VDZ 2
PD = PB D Z = PB
2
10, 000mph
VB
(3.8.1.2.1-1)
PB
VB
V30
VDZ
(Table 3.8.1.2.1-1)
V Z
VDZ = 2.5Vo 30 ln
VB Z o
= ( 2.5 ) ( 8.20
PD = ( 50
psf
(105.8 )
mph
(3.8.1.1-1)
ft
100 40
) 100 Ln 0.23ft = 105.8mph
mph 2
(10, 000 )
mph 2
PD
= 55.92psf
hexp
WS H ,Total
kip
1
WS H , Abt = ( 583.7 lbs
ft ) ( 2 ) (165' ) = 48.16
WS H , Pier
kip
1
= ( 583.7 lbs
ft ) ( 2 ) ( 2 ) (165' ) = 96.31
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 13 of 62
-- 13 --
Total Uplift:
kip
1
For Center Pier: ( 840 lbs
ft ) ( 2 ) ( 2 ) (165' ) = 138.6
WL
PD
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 14 of 62
-- 14 --
4
4
bf
15"
= (12)(8.5") +
= 109.5"
12ts +
2
2
S = (12')(12 in ft ) = 144"
4
4
bf
15"
= (12)(8.5") +
= 109.5"
12ts +
2
2
S
12'
Note that Leff was taken as 132.0 in the above calculations since for the case of effective width in
continuous bridges, the span length is taken as the distance from the support to the point of dead load
contra flexure.
For computing the section properties shown on the two pages that follow, reinforcing steel in the deck
was ignored for short-term and long-term composite calculations but was included for the cracked
section. The properties for the cracked Section #1 are not used in this example, thus the amount of rebar
included is moot. For the properties of cracked Section #2, As = 13.02 in2 located 4.5 from the top of the
slab was taken from an underlying example problem first presented by Barth (2004).
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 15 of 62
-- 15 --
Top Flange
Web
Bot Flange
t
0.7500
0.5625
1.0000
b
15.00
69.00
21.00
A
11.25
38.81
21.00
Ix
Ay
791.72
0.53
1,377.84 15,398.86
10.50
1.75
y
70.38
35.50
0.50
71.06
Y=
Ad2
17,728
902
19,125
IX
17,729
16,301
19,127
2,180.06
ITotal =
53,157
30.68
SBS1,top =
1,327
SBS1,bot =
1,733
d
-39.70
-4.82
30.18
Short-Term Composite (n = 8)
Slab
Haunch
Top Flange
Web
Bot Flange
t
8.5000
0.0000
0.7500
0.5625
1.0000
b
109.50
15.00
15.0000
69.0000
21.0000
n:
8.00
A
116.34
0.00
11.25
38.81
21.00
187.41
y
75.00
70.75
70.38
35.50
0.50
Ix
Ay
8,725.78
700.49
0.00
0.00
791.72
0.53
1,377.84 15,398.86
10.50
1.75
10,905.84
Y=
Ad2
d
-16.81
-12.56
-12.18
22.69
57.69
58.19
IX
32,862
0
1,669
19,988
69,900
ITotal =
33,562
0
1,670
35,387
69,901
140,521
SST1,top =
SST1,bot =
11,191
2,415
Slab
Haunch
Top Flange
Web
Bot Flange
t
8.5000
0.0000
0.7500
0.5625
1.0000
b
109.50
15.00
15.0000
69.0000
21.0000
n:
24.00
A
38.78
0.00
11.25
38.81
21.00
109.84
y
75.00
70.75
70.38
35.50
0.50
Y=
Ix
Ay
2,908.59
233.50
0.00
0.00
791.72
0.53
1,377.84 15,398.86
10.50
1.75
5,088.66
Ad2
31,885
0
6,506
4,549
44,101
ITotal =
IX
32,119
0
6,507
19,948
44,103
102,676
SLT1,top =
SLT1,bot =
4,204
2,216
d
-28.67
-24.42
-24.05
10.83
45.83
46.33
Cracked Section
Rebar
Top Flange
Web
Bot Flange
t
4.5000
0.7500
0.5625
1.0000
b
15.0000
69.0000
21.0000
A
13.02
11.25
38.81
21.00
84.08
y
75.25
70.38
35.50
0.50
Y=
Ix
Ay
979.76
791.72
0.53
1,377.84 15,398.86
10.50
1.75
3,159.82
37.58
Ad2
73,727
55,717
48,913
5
ITotal =
IX
73,727
55,718
64,312
7
193,764
SCR1,top =
SCR1,bot =
5,842
5,156
d
-75.25
-70.38
-35.50
-0.50
These section properties do NOT include the haunch or sacrificial wearing surface.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 16 of 62
-- 16 --
Top Flange
Web
Bot Flange
t
1.0000
0.5625
2.5000
b
21.00
69.00
21.00
A
21.00
38.81
52.50
Ix
Ay
1,512.00
1.75
1,436.06 15,398.86
65.63
27.34
y
72.00
37.00
1.25
112.31
Y=
Ad2
42,841
4,012
34,361
IX
42,843
19,411
34,388
3,013.69
ITotal =
96,642
26.83
SBS2,top =
2,116
SBS2,bot =
3,602
d
-45.17
-10.17
25.58
Slab
Haunch
Top Flange
Web
Bot Flange
t
8.5000
0.0000
1.0000
0.5625
2.5000
b
109.50
21.00
21.0000
69.0000
21.0000
n:
8.00
A
116.34
0.00
21.00
38.81
52.50
228.66
y
76.75
72.50
72.00
37.00
1.25
Ix
Ay
8,929.38
700.49
0.00
0.00
1,512.00
1.75
1,436.06 15,398.86
65.63
27.34
11,943.07
Y=
d
-24.52
-20.27
-19.77
15.23
50.98
52.23
Ad2
IX
69,941
0
8,207
9,005
136,454
ITotal =
70,641
0
8,208
24,403
136,481
239,734
SST2,top =
SST2,bot =
11,828
4,590
Slab
Haunch
Top Flange
Web
Bot Flange
t
8.5000
0.0000
1.0000
0.5625
2.5000
b
109.50
15.00
21.0000
69.0000
21.0000
n:
24.00
A
38.78
0.00
21.00
38.81
52.50
151.09
y
76.75
72.50
72.00
37.00
1.25
Y=
Ix
Ay
2,976.46
233.50
0.00
0.00
1,512.00
1.75
1,436.06 15,398.86
65.63
27.34
5,990.15
Ad2
53,393
0
21,983
272
77,395
ITotal =
IX
53,626
0
21,985
15,670
77,423
168,704
SLT2,top =
SLT2,bot =
5,135
4,255
d
-37.10
-32.85
-32.35
2.65
38.40
39.65
Cracked Section
Rebar
Top Flange
Web
Bot Flange
t
4.5000
1.0000
0.5625
2.5000
b
21.0000
69.0000
21.0000
A
13.02
21.00
38.81
52.50
125.33
y
77.00
72.00
37.00
1.25
Y=
Ix
Ay
1,002.54
1,512.00
1.75
1,436.06 15,398.86
65.63
27.34
4,016.23
32.04
Ad2
26,313
33,525
953
49,786
ITotal =
IX
26,313
33,527
16,352
49,813
126,006
SCR2,top =
SCR2,bot =
3,115
3,932
d
-44.96
-39.96
-4.96
30.79
These section properties do NOT include the haunch or sacrificial wearing surface.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 17 of 62
-- 17 --
0.1
2
K g = n( I + Aeg )
4
0.4
0.3
4
12 ' 12 ' 1, 672, 000 in
14 165 ' (12)(165 ')(8.5")3
0.1
In these calculations, the terms eg and Kg include the haunch and sacrificial wearing surface since
doing so increases the resulting factor. Note that ts in the denominator of the final term excludes
the sacrificial wearing surface since excluding it increases the resulting factor.
Two or More Lanes Loaded:
0.1
DFM 2, Int +
0.6
0.2
S S Kg
= 0.075 +
9.5 L 12 Lt s3
DFM 2, Int +
0.6
0.2
4
12 ' 12 ' 1, 672, 000 in
= 0.075 +
9.5 165 ' 12(165 ')(8.5")3
0.1
Exterior Girder
One Lane Loaded:
DFM 1, Ext + =
8.5
12
= 0.7083
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 18 of 62
-- 18 --
DFM2,Ext+ = e DFM2,Int+
e = 0.77 +
= 0.77 +
de
9.1
1.5
9.1
= 0.9348
DFM 1, Int
0.4
0.3
S S Kg
= 0.06 +
14 L 12 Lts3
0.1
2
K g = n( I + Aeg )
0.1
0.1
DFM 2, Int
0.6
0.2
S S Kg
= 0.075 +
9.5 L 12 Lt s3
DFM 2, Int
0.6
0.2
4
12 ' 12 ' 3, 218, 000 in
= 0.075 +
9.5 165 ' (12)(165 ')(8.5")3
0.1
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 19 of 62
-- 19 --
Exterior Girder
One Lane Loaded:
DFM2,Ext- = e DFM2,Intd
e = 0.77 + e
9.1
= 0.77 +
1.5
9.1
= 0.9348
DF
Ext , Min
NL
Nb
X Ext e
Nb
DF
M 1, Ext , Min
1
4
= 0.6125
Multiple Presence:
DFM1,Ext,Min = (1.2) (0.6125) = 0.7350
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 20 of 62
-- 20 --
3'
3'
2'
3'
3'
P1
P2
DF
M 2 , Ext , Min
2
4
= 0.9250
Multiple Presence:
DFM2,Ext,Min = (1.0) (0.9250) = 0.9250
Lane 1 (12')
3'
Lane 2 (12')
12'
6'
The case of three lanes loaded is not considered for the minimum exterior distribution factor since
the third truck will be placed to the right of the center of gravity of the girders, which will
stabilize the rigid body rotation effect resulting in a lower factor.
1 Lane Loaded:
2 Lanes Loaded:
Positive Moment
Interior
Exterior
0.5021
0.8500 0.7350
0.7781
0.7274 0.9250
Negative Moment
Interior
Exterior
0.5321
0.8500 0.7350
0.8257
0.7719 0.9250
For Simplicity, take the Moment Distribution Factor as 0.9250 everywhere for the Strength and Service
load combinations.
Fatigue Moment Distribution:
For Fatigue, the distribution factor is based on the one-lane-loaded situations with a multiple presence
factor of 1.00. Since the multiple presence factor for 1-lane loaded is 1.2, these factors can be obtained
by divided the first row of the table above by 1.2.
1 Lane Loaded:
Positive Moment
Interior
Exterior
0.4184
0.7083 0.6125
Negative Moment
Interior
Exterior
0.4434
0.7083 0.6125
For Simplicity, take the Moment Distribution Factor as 0.7083 everywhere for the Fatigue load
combination
Multiplying the live load moments by this distribution factor of 0.9250 yields the table of nominal
girder moments shown on the following page.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 21 of 62
-- 21 --
(LL+IM)+
(k-ft)
0.0
1605.1
2791.4
3572.6
3999.4
4066.7
3842.5
3310.8
2509.4
1508.6
1274.6
1048.4
828.6
615.8
463.3
320.5
185.5
76.4
0.0
76.4
185.5
320.5
463.3
615.8
828.6
1048.4
1274.6
1508.6
2509.4
3310.8
3842.5
4066.7
3999.4
3572.6
2791.4
1605.1
0.0
(LL+IM)(k-ft)
0.0
-280.7
-561.3
-842.0
-1122.7
-1403.4
-1684.0
-1964.7
-2245.4
-2547.5
-2660.0
-2793.3
-2945.6
-3115.6
-3371.3
-3728.6
-4105.0
-4496.9
-4918.1
-4496.9
-4105.0
-3728.6
-3371.3
-3115.6
-2945.6
-2793.3
-2660.0
-2547.5
-2245.4
-1964.7
-1684.0
-1403.4
-1122.7
-842.0
-561.3
-280.7
0.0
Nominal Moments
Fat+
Fat(k-ft)
(k-ft)
0.2
0.0
645.6
-68.9
1127.9
-137.9
1449.4
-206.8
1626.1
-275.8
1647.9
-344.7
1599.4
-413.7
1439.3
-482.6
1148.6
-551.6
763.6
-620.5
651.3
-637.8
539.1
-655.0
425.3
-672.2
310.8
-689.5
221.9
-706.7
158.6
-724.0
98.8
-741.2
49.4
-758.4
0.1
-775.6
49.4
-758.4
98.8
-741.2
158.6
-724.0
221.9
-706.7
310.8
-689.5
425.3
-672.2
539.1
-655.0
651.3
-637.8
763.2
-620.6
1148.6
-551.6
1439.3
-482.6
1599.4
-413.7
1647.9
-344.7
1626.1
-275.8
1449.4
-206.8
1127.9
-137.9
645.6
-68.9
0.2
0.0
DC1
(k-ft)
0.0
1309.9
2244.5
2799.9
2978.6
2779.3
2202.1
1248.4
-84.8
-1793.1
-2280.8
-2794.0
-3333.2
-3898.1
-4488.6
-5105.1
-5747.2
-6415.3
-7108.8
-6415.3
-5747.2
-5105.1
-4488.6
-3898.1
-3333.2
-2794.0
-2280.8
-1793.1
-84.8
1248.4
2202.1
2779.3
2978.6
2799.9
2244.5
1309.9
0.0
DC2
(k-ft)
0.0
240.0
412.0
515.0
549.7
515.8
413.2
242.3
2.5
-305.4
-393.2
-485.2
-581.5
-682.1
-787.0
-896.2
-1009.7
-1127.5
-1249.5
-1127.5
-1009.7
-896.2
-787.0
-682.1
-581.5
-485.2
-393.2
-305.4
2.5
242.3
413.2
515.8
549.7
515.0
412.0
240.0
0.0
DW
(k-ft)
0.0
440.3
755.6
944.7
1008.3
946.1
757.9
444.4
4.6
-560.2
-721.2
-890.0
-1066.7
-1251.3
-1443.7
-1643.9
-1852.1
-2068.1
-2291.9
-2068.1
-1852.1
-1643.9
-1443.7
-1251.3
-1066.7
-890.0
-721.2
-560.2
4.6
444.4
757.9
946.1
1008.3
944.7
755.6
440.3
0.0
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 22 of 62
-- 22 --
The distribution factors for shear are independent of the section properties and span length. Thus, the
only one set of calculations are need - they apply to both the section 1 and section 2
5.1: Interior Girder
One Lane Loaded:
S
25.0
12 '
= 0.36 +
= 0.8400
25.0
DFV 2 ,Int
S S
= 0.2 +
12 35
= 0.2 +
12 ' 12 '
= 1.082
12 35
DFV2,Ext = e DFV2,Int
de
10
1.5'
= 0.60 +
= 0.7500
10
e = 0.60 +
The minimum exterior girder distribution factor applies to shear as well as moment.
DFV1,Ext,Min = 0.7350
DFV2,Ext,Min = 0.9250
2- Span Continuous Bridge Example
ODOT LRFD Short Course - Steel
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 23 of 62
-- 23 --
1 Lane Loaded:
2 Lanes Loaded:
Shear Distribution
Interior
Exterior
0.8400
0.8500 0.7350
1.082
0.6300 0.9250
For Simplicity, take the Shear Distribution Factor as 1.082 everywhere for Strength and Service load
combinations.
For Fatigue, the distribution factor is based on the one-lane-loaded situations with a multiple presence
factor of 1.00. Since the multiple presence factor for 1-lane loaded is 1.2, these factors can be obtained
by divided the first row of the table above by 1.2.
1 Lane Loaded:
Shear Distribution
Interior
Exterior
0.7000
0.7083 0.6125
For Simplicity, take the Shear Distribution Factor as 0.7083 everywhere for the Fatigue load combination.
Multiplying the live load shears by these distribution factors yields the table of nominal girder
shears shown on the following page.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 24 of 62
-- 24 --
(LL+IM)+
(kip)
144.9
123.5
103.5
85.0
68.1
52.8
39.4
27.8
18.0
10.0
8.3
6.7
5.5
4.3
3.2
2.2
1.3
0.0
0.0
170.1
166.2
162.3
158.4
154.5
150.5
146.5
142.5
138.6
122.3
105.7
89.1
72.7
56.7
41.4
26.8
20.3
19.7
(LL+IM)(kip)
-19.7
-20.3
-26.8
-41.4
-56.7
-72.7
-89.1
-105.7
-122.3
-138.6
-142.5
-146.5
-150.5
-154.5
-158.4
-162.3
-166.2
-170.1
-173.9
-0.5
-1.3
-2.2
-3.2
-4.3
-5.5
-6.7
-8.3
-10.0
-18.0
-27.8
-39.4
-52.8
-68.1
-85.0
-103.5
-123.5
-144.9
Nominal Shears
Fat+
Fat(kip)
(kip)
50.8
-4.7
44.6
-4.7
38.5
-6.4
32.6
-11.1
26.9
-17.2
21.4
-23.2
16.3
-29.0
11.5
-34.6
7.3
-39.9
3.9
-44.9
3.4
-46.0
2.8
-47.2
2.3
-48.3
1.8
-49.4
1.4
-50.4
1.0
-51.5
0.6
-52.4
0.3
-53.4
54.3
-54.3
53.4
-0.3
52.4
-0.6
51.5
-1.0
50.4
-1.4
49.4
-1.8
48.3
-2.3
47.2
-2.8
46.0
-3.4
44.9
-3.9
39.9
-7.3
34.6
-11.5
29.0
-16.3
23.2
-21.4
17.2
-26.9
11.1
-32.6
6.4
-38.5
4.7
-44.6
4.7
-50.8
DC1
(kip)
115.0
88.8
62.5
36.3
10.1
-16.1
-42.3
-68.6
-94.8
-121.0
-127.6
-134.1
-140.7
-147.2
-153.8
-160.3
-166.9
-173.4
-180.0
173.4
166.9
160.3
153.8
147.2
140.7
134.1
127.6
121.0
94.8
68.6
42.3
16.1
-10.1
-36.3
-62.5
-88.8
-115.0
DC2
(kip)
20.6
15.9
11.2
6.5
1.8
-2.9
-7.6
-12.3
-17.0
-21.7
-22.8
-24.0
-25.2
-26.4
-27.5
-28.7
-29.9
-31.0
-32.2
31.0
29.9
28.7
27.5
26.4
25.2
24.0
22.8
21.7
17.0
12.3
7.6
2.9
-1.8
-6.5
-11.2
-15.9
-20.6
DW
(kip)
37.6
29.0
20.5
11.9
3.3
-5.3
-13.9
-22.4
-31.0
-39.6
-41.7
-43.9
-46.0
-48.2
-50.3
-52.5
-54.6
-56.8
-58.9
56.8
54.6
52.5
50.3
48.2
46.0
43.9
41.7
39.6
31.0
22.4
13.9
5.3
-3.3
-11.9
-20.5
-29.0
-37.6
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 25 of 62
-- 25 --
Service II:
Fatigue:
0.75(LL + IM)
Strength II is not considered since this deals with special permit loads. Strength III and V are not
considered as they include wind effects, which will be handled separately as needed. Strength IV is
considered but is not expected to govern since it addresses situations with high dead load that come into
play for longer spans. Extreme Event load combinations are not included as they are also beyond the
scope of this example. Service I again applies to wind loads and is not considered (except for deflection)
and Service III and Service IV correspond to tension in prestressed concrete elements and are therefore
not included in this example.
In addition to the factors shown above, a load modifier, , was applied as is shown below.
Q = i i Qi
is taken as the product of D, R, and I, and is taken as not less than 0.95. For this example,
D and I are taken as 1.00 while R is taken as 1.05 since the bridge has 4 girders with a
Using these load combinations, the shear and moment envelopes shown on the following pages
were developed.
Note that for the calculation of the Fatigue moments and shears that is taken as 1.00 and the
distribution factor is based on the one-lane-loaded situations with a multiple presence factor of
1.00 (AASHTO Sections 6.6.1.2.2, Page 6-29 and 3.6.1.4.3b, Page 3-25).
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 26 of 62
-- 26 --
10,000
Strength IV
Moment (kip-ft)
5,000
0
-5,000
Strength IV
-10,000
-15,000
Strength I
-20,000
-25,000
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
270
300
330
Station (ft)
600
400
Strength IV
Shear (kip)
200
-200
-400
-600
-800
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
Station (ft)
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 27 of 62
-- 27 --
Moment (kip-ft)
2,500
0
-2,500
-5,000
-7,500
-10,000
-12,500
-15,000
-17,500
-20,000
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
270
300
330
Station (ft)
400
Shear (kip)
200
-200
-400
-600
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
Station (ft)
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 28 of 62
-- 28 --
1,000
Moment (kip-ft)
500
-500
-1,000
-1,500
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
270
300
330
Station (ft)
Shear (kip)
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
Station (ft)
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 29 of 62
-- 29 --
Strength I
Total +
Total (k-ft)
(k-ft)
0.0
0.0
5677.1
-515.7
9806.0
-1031.5
12403.3
-1547.2
13567.8
-2062.9
13287.4
-2578.7
11687.1
-3094.4
8740.0
-3610.2
4621.6
-4237.1
2772.1
-8317.5
2342.0
-9533.2
1926.4 -10838.2
1522.6 -12230.6
1131.6 -13707.1
851.2 -15392.8
588.9 -17317.3
340.9 -19328.3
140.4 -21420.1
0.0 -23617.1
140.4 -21420.1
340.9 -19328.3
588.9 -17317.3
851.2 -15392.8
1131.6 -13707.1
1522.6 -12230.6
1926.4 -10838.2
2342.0
-9533.2
2772.1
-8317.5
4621.6
-4237.1
8740.0
-3610.2
11687.1
-3094.4
13287.4
-2578.7
13567.8
-2062.9
12403.3
-1547.2
9806.0
-1031.5
5677.1
-515.7
0.0
0.0
Strength IV
Total +
Total (k-ft)
(k-ft)
0.0
0.0
3134.6
0.0
5374.1
0.0
6708.8
0.0
7145.1
0.0
6679.8
0.0
5312.9
0.0
3047.7
0.0
11.2
-133.5
0.0
-4187.3
0.0
-5347.3
0.0
-6566.4
0.0
-7845.7
0.0
-9184.5
0.0 -10582.9
0.0 -12041.3
0.0 -13559.1
0.0 -15137.1
0.0 -16774.1
0.0 -15137.1
0.0 -13559.1
0.0 -12041.3
0.0 -10582.9
0.0
-9184.5
0.0
-7845.7
0.0
-6566.4
0.0
-5347.3
0.0
-4187.3
11.2
-133.5
3047.7
0.0
5312.9
0.0
6679.8
0.0
7145.1
0.0
6708.8
0.0
5374.1
0.0
3134.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
Service II
Total +
Total (k-ft)
(k-ft)
0.0
0.0
4280.7
-383.1
7393.0
-766.2
9349.1
-1149.4
10222.6
-1532.5
10004.2
-1915.6
8787.0
-2298.7
6551.1
-2681.8
3432.8
-3153.9
2059.3
-6268.9
1739.8
-7195.8
1431.1
-8190.4
1131.1
-9251.2
840.6 -10375.8
632.3 -11657.1
437.4 -13117.1
253.3 -14642.7
104.3 -16229.6
0.0 -17895.9
104.3 -16229.6
253.3 -14642.7
437.4 -13117.1
632.3 -11657.1
840.6 -10375.8
1131.1
-9251.2
1431.1
-8190.4
1739.8
-7195.8
2059.3
-6268.9
3432.8
-3153.9
6551.1
-2681.8
8787.0
-2298.7
10004.2
-1915.6
10222.6
-1532.5
9349.1
-1149.4
7393.0
-766.2
4280.7
-383.1
0.0
0.0
Fatigue
Total +
Total (k-ft)
(k-ft)
0.2
0.0
484.2
-51.7
845.9
-103.4
1087.1
-155.1
1219.6
-206.8
1235.9
-258.6
1199.5
-310.3
1079.5
-362.0
861.5
-413.7
572.7
-465.4
488.5
-478.3
404.3
-491.3
318.9
-504.2
233.1
-517.1
166.5
-530.0
119.0
-543.0
74.1
-555.9
37.1
-568.8
0.1
-581.7
37.1
-568.8
74.1
-555.9
119.0
-543.0
166.5
-530.0
233.1
-517.1
318.9
-504.2
404.3
-491.3
488.5
-478.3
572.4
-465.4
861.5
-413.7
1079.5
-362.0
1199.5
-310.3
1235.9
-258.6
1219.6
-206.8
1087.1
-155.1
845.9
-103.4
484.2
-51.7
0.2
0.0
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 30 of 62
-- 30 --
Strength I
Total +
Total (kip)
(kip)
479.5
-34.5
390.5
-35.5
304.0
-46.9
220.1
-72.4
138.9
-99.3
92.5
-158.9
68.9
-239.1
48.6
-319.7
31.5
-400.1
17.5
-480.2
14.5
-500.0
11.7
-519.8
9.6
-539.7
7.6
-559.6
5.7
-579.3
3.9
-599.0
2.2
-618.7
0.0
-638.3
0.0
-657.9
638.3
-0.9
618.7
-2.2
599.0
-3.9
579.3
-5.7
559.6
-7.6
539.7
-9.6
519.8
-11.7
500.0
-14.5
480.2
-17.5
400.1
-31.5
319.7
-48.6
239.1
-68.9
158.9
-92.5
99.3
-138.9
72.4
-220.1
46.9
-304.0
35.5
-390.5
34.5
-479.5
Strength IV
Total +
Total (kip)
(kip)
272.8
0.0
210.6
0.0
148.4
0.0
86.2
0.0
24.0
0.0
0.0
-38.2
0.0
-100.4
0.0
-162.6
0.0
-224.8
0.0
-287.0
0.0
-302.6
0.0
-318.1
0.0
-333.7
0.0
-349.2
0.0
-364.8
0.0
-380.3
0.0
-395.9
0.0
-411.4
0.0
-427.0
411.4
0.0
395.9
0.0
380.3
0.0
364.8
0.0
349.2
0.0
333.7
0.0
318.1
0.0
302.6
0.0
287.0
0.0
224.8
0.0
162.6
0.0
100.4
0.0
38.2
0.0
0.0
-24.0
0.0
-86.2
0.0
-148.4
0.0
-210.6
0.0
-272.8
Service II
Total +
Total (kip)
(kip)
379.7
-26.9
309.0
-27.7
240.2
-36.6
173.4
-56.5
108.9
-77.5
72.1
-124.8
53.8
-188.6
37.9
-252.7
24.6
-316.8
13.7
-380.5
11.3
-396.3
9.2
-412.1
7.5
-427.9
5.9
-443.7
4.4
-459.4
3.0
-475.1
1.7
-490.8
0.0
-506.4
0.0
-522.0
506.4
-0.7
490.8
-1.7
475.1
-3.0
459.4
-4.4
443.7
-5.9
427.9
-7.5
412.1
-9.2
396.3
-11.3
380.5
-13.7
316.8
-24.6
252.7
-37.9
188.6
-53.8
124.8
-72.1
77.5
-108.9
56.5
-173.4
36.6
-240.2
27.7
-309.0
26.9
-379.7
Fatigue
Total +
Total (kip)
(kip)
38.1
-3.5
33.5
-3.5
28.9
-4.8
24.5
-8.3
20.2
-12.9
16.1
-17.4
12.2
-21.8
8.6
-26.0
5.5
-29.9
3.0
-33.7
2.5
-34.5
2.1
-35.4
1.7
-36.2
1.4
-37.0
1.0
-37.8
0.8
-38.6
0.5
-39.3
0.2
-40.0
40.7
-40.7
40.0
-0.2
39.3
-0.5
38.6
-0.8
37.8
-1.0
37.0
-1.4
36.2
-1.7
35.4
-2.1
34.5
-2.5
33.7
-2.9
29.9
-5.5
26.0
-8.6
21.8
-12.2
17.4
-16.1
12.9
-20.2
8.3
-24.5
4.8
-28.9
3.5
-33.5
3.5
-38.1
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 31 of 62
-- 31 --
7. FATIGUE CHECKS
7.1: Check transverse stiffener to flange weld at Station 73.3:
Traffic information:
ADTT given as 2400. Three lanes are available to trucks. (ADTT)SL = (0.80) (2,400) = 1,920
N = (ADTT)SL (365) (75) n = (1,920) (365) (75) (1) = 52.56M Cycles
Check Top Flange Weld:
Fatigue need only be checked when the compressive stress due to unfactored permanent loads is
less than twice the maximum tensile stress due to factored fatigue loads.
?
(Pg 24)
M DC1 = 2, 779k-ft
f DC1 =
in
ft
ksi
53,157 in 4
(Pg 16)
(Pg 24)
(Pg 16)
M DC 2 = 515.8k-ft
f DC 2 =
in
ft
102, 676 in
ksi
(Pg 16)
(Pg 30)
f Fat =
in
ft
140,521 in
ksi
(Pg 16)
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 32 of 62
-- 32 --
( f ) ( F )n
1
( F ) n
A 3 ( F )TH
=
2
N
( f ) =
in
ft
140,521 in
ksi
( F )TH
2
12.0ksi
= 6.00ksi
2
8
3
A 3 44 10 ksi 3
=
= 4.375ksi
6
N 52.56 10
( F )TH
A 3
= 6.00ksi , the infinite life governs.
Since = 4.375ksi is less than
2
N
( F )n = 6.00ksi
Since ( f ) = 6.036ksi > ( F )n = 6.00ksi , the detail is not satisfactory.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 33 of 62
-- 33 --
( F )TH
2
A 3
( f )
N
( f )
44 108 ksi3
( 6.036 )
ksi 3
= 20.01106 cycles
20.01106 cycles
= 10, 420 days
1,920
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 34 of 62
-- 34 --
69"
D
150
tw
9 "
16
= 122.7 150
O.K.
Flange Proportions
bf
12
2t f
15"
= 10.00 12
(2)( 3 4 ")
O.K.
bf
12
2t f
21"
= 10.50 12
(2)(1")
O.K.
bf
12
2t f
21"
= 4.200 12
(2)(2 12 ")
O.K.
b f + 2.5 12"
6
b f ,min =
69"
+ 2.5 = 14"
D 69"
=
=11.50"
6
6
O.K.
O.K.
5
O.K.
8"
0.1
I yc
10
I yt
0.1
( 3 4 ")(15")3
= 0.2733 10
(1")(21")3
O.K.
0.1
I yc
10
I yt
0.1
(2.5")(21")3
= 2.500 10
(1")(21")3
O.K.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 35 of 62
-- 35 --
The cross section of Section 1 that is used for computing deflections is shown above. The entire deck
width is used (as opposed to just the effective width that was used earlier) and the haunch and sacrificial
wearing surface have been neglected. AASHTO permits the use of the stiffness of parapets and
structurally continuous railing but ODOT does not.
The transformed width of the bridge deck is w ' =
= 63.00"
Using the bottom of the steel as a datum, the location of the CG of the deck can be found as:
8.5"
= 75.00"
2
Concrete
Steel
( 63")( 8.5")
12
129, 700 in 4
450,900 in 4
I1 =
2- Span Continuous Bridge Example
ODOT LRFD Short Course - Steel
580, 600 in 4
in 4
= 145,100 Girder
4 Girders
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 36 of 62
-- 36 --
Section 2
The cross section of Section 2 that is used for computing deflections is shown above.
The transformed width of the bridge deck is w ' =
Using the bottom of the steel as a datum, the location of the CG of the deck can be found as:
8.5"
= 76.75"
2
Concrete
Steel
( 63")( 8.5")
12
280,900 in 4
717, 700 in 4
I2 =
998, 600 in 4
in 4
= 249, 700 Girder
4 Girders
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 37 of 62
-- 37 --
The following model, which represents the stiffness of a single girder, was used to compute absolute liveload deflections assuming the entire width of the deck to be effective in both compression and tension.
The live load component of the Service I load combination is applied. Based on AASHTO Section
3.6.1.3.2, the loading includes (1) the design truck alone and (2) the lane load with 25% of the design
truck. The design truck and design lane load were applied separately in the model and will be combined
below. The design truck included 33% impact.
I = 145,100 in4
I = 249,700 in4
I = 145,100 in4
( 0.85 )( 3)
1 =
( 2.442") = 1.558"
4
(
)
Governs
( 0.85 )( 3)
2 =
( 0.8442") + ( 0.25 )( 2.442") = 0.9274"
( 4)
The limiting deflection for this bridge is:
Limit =
OK
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 38 of 62
-- 38 --
(1)
( 2)
OK
OK
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 39 of 62
-- 39 --
Top Flange:
f f 0.95Rh Fyf
Bottom Flange
ff +
fl
0.95Rh Fyf
2
Per 6.10.1.1.1a, elastic stresses at any location in a composite section shall consist of the sum of stresses
caused by loads applied separately to the bare steel, short-term composite section, and long-term
composite section.
M DC 1
M
M
+ 1.00 DC 2 + 1.00 DW
S LT
S LT
S BS
fc = 1.00
M LL + IM
+ 1.30 S
ST
(2, 979
f f ,58.7 = 1.00
k-ft
)(12 in
ft )
1,327 in
(549.7
+ 1.00
k-ft
)(12 in
ft )
4,204 in
(1, 008
+ 1.00
k-ft
)(12 in
ft )
4,204 in
(3, 999
+ 1.30
k-ft
)(12 in
ft )
11,191 in
f f ,58.7 = 36.96ksi
(2, 779
f f , 73.3 = 1.00
k-ft
)(12 in
ft )
1,327 in
(515.8
+ 1.00
k-ft
)(12 in
ft )
4,204 in
(946.1
k-ft
+ 1.00
)(12 in
ft )
4,204 in
(4, 067
+ 1.30
k-ft
)(12 in
ft )
11,191 in
O.K.
Note: The bending moments in the above calculations come from page 22 while the moments of
inertia are found on page 16.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 40 of 62
-- 40 --
(2, 979
f f ,58.7 = 1.00
k-ft
)(12 in
ft )
1,733 in
(549.7
+ 1.00
k-ft
)(12 in
ft )
2,216 in
(1, 008
+ 1.00
k-ft
)(12 in
ft )
2,216 in
(3, 999
+ 1.30
k-ft
)(12 in
ft )
2,415 in
f f ,58.7 = 54.90ksi
2,216 in
2,216 in
2,415 in
1,733 in
k-ft
f f , 73.3
k-ft
k-ft
k-ft
f f ,73.3 = 53.43ksi
The stress at 58.7 governs. ff = 54.90ksi.
The load factor for wind under Service II is 0.00, fl = 0ksi
ff +
fl
0.95Rh Fyf
2
54.90ksi +
0ksi
(0.95)(1.00)(50ksi ) = 47.50ksi
2
No Good.
Note: The bending moments in the above calculations come from page 22 while the moments of
inertia are found on page 17.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 41 of 62
-- 41 --
5,135 in
5,135 in
11,828 in
2,116 in
k-ft
f f ,165
k-ft
k-ft
k-ft
f f ,165 = 55.08ksi
f f 0.95 Rh Fyf
No Good.
(7,108
f f = 1.00
k-ft
)(12 in
ft )
3,602 in
(1, 250
+ 1.00
k-ft
)(12 in
ft )
4,255 in
(2, 292
+ 1.00
k-ft
)(12 in
ft )
4,255 in
(4, 918
+ 1.30
k-ft
)(12 in
ft )
4,590 in
f f = 50.39 ksi
The load factor for wind under Service II is 0.00, fl = 0ksi
ff +
fl
0.95 Rh Fyf
2
50.39 ksi +
0ksi
(0.95)(1.00)(50ksi ) = 47.50ksi
2
No Good.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 42 of 62
-- 42 --
f c Fcrw
where:
Fcrw =
0.9 Ek
D
tw
k=
and
( Dc / D )
Section 1
Not Applicable
Section 2
(7,108 )(12
3,602 in
k-ft
fc = 1.00
in
+ 1.00
ft
in
ft
+ 1.00
in
ft
+ 1.30
ft
ft
in
f c = 50.39 ksi
(7,108 )(12
2,116 in
k-ft
ft = 1.00
in
ft
+ 1.00
in
ft
+ 1.00
k-ft
in
ft
+ 1.30
in
ft = 55.08ksi
fc
Dc =
d tcf 0
f c + ft
50.39ksi
72.5") 2.5" 0
=
ksi
ksi (
50.39 + 55.08
= 32.14
k=
( Dc / D )
Fcrw =
32.14"
69"
= 41.49
69"
9 "
16
= 71.96 ksi
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 43 of 62
-- 43 --
Check
2 Dcp
E
3.76
tw
Fyc
Find Dcp, the depth of the web in compression at Mp (compression rebar in the slab is ignored).
Pt = Fyt bt tt = (50ksi ) ( 21")(1") = 1,050kip
Pw = Fyw Dtw = (50ksi )(69")(916 ") = 1,941kip
Pc = Fyc bc tc = (50ksi )(15")( 3 4 ") = 562.5kip
Ps = 0.85 f c'bs ts = (0.85)(4.5ksi )(109.5")(8.5") = 3,560kip
3,554kip < 3,560kip, the PNA lies in the slab.
P + Pw + Pt
3,554kip
Y = ( ts ) c
=
8.5"
(
)
kip
Ps
3,560
Since none of the web is in compression, Dcp = 0 and the web is compact.
For Composite Sections in Positive Flexure, (6.10.7.1, Pg. 6.101 6.102)
Mu +
1
f S f Mn
3 l xt
0.1Dt = 7.925
Dt
M p = (3,554kip ) 79.25"
= 157,500
k-in
8.486"
30.68"
2
= 13,130k-ft
8.486"
M n = 13,130k-ft 1.07 ( 0.7 )
= 13,060k-ft
79.25"
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 44 of 62
-- 44 --
M u + 13 f l S xt f M n
No Good.
Note that the check of M n 1.3Rh M y has not been made in the above calculations. This
section would satisfy the Article B6.2 so this check doesnt need to be made.
Check the ductility requirement to prevent crushing of the slab:
?
D p 0.42 Dt
O.K.
The Section is NOT Adequate for Positive Flexure at Stations 58.7 and 271.3
The Girder failed the checks for service limits and has failed the first of several checks at the
strength limit state. At this point I will investigate the strength of a section with 70ksi steel in the top
and bottom flanges.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 45 of 62
-- 45 --
12 + 3 3
12 + 2
Rh , Section 1 =
1.0
50ksi
= 0.7143
70ksi
= 0.9626
Rh =
12 + 3 3
Governs
12 + 2
Rh , Section 2 =
1.0
50ksi
= 0.7143
70ksi
= 0.9833
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 46 of 62
-- 46 --
Top Flange:
f f 0.95Rh Fyf
Bottom Flange
ff +
fl
0.95Rh Fyf
2
O.K.
ff +
fl
0.95Rh Fyf
2
54.90ksi +
0ksi ?
(0.95)(0.9626)(70ksi ) = 64.01ksi
2
O.K.
O.K.
fl
0.95 Rh Fyf
2
50.39ksi +
0ksi ?
(0.95)(0.9833)(70ksi ) = 65.39ksi
2
O.K.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 47 of 62
-- 47 --
f c Fcrw
where:
Fcrw =
0.9 Ek
D
tw
k=
and
( Dc / D )
Not Applicable
Section 1 -
Section 2
(7,108 )(12
3,602 in
k-ft
fc = 1.00
in
+ 1.00
ft
in
ft
+ 1.00
in
ft
+ 1.30
ft
ft
in
f c = 50.39ksi
(7,108 )(12
2,116 in
k-ft
ft = 1.00
in
ft
+ 1.00
in
ft
+ 1.00
k-ft
in
ft
+ 1.30
in
ft = 55.08ksi
fc
Dc =
d tcf 0
f c + ft
50.39ksi
72.5") 2.5" 0
=
ksi
ksi (
50.39 + 55.08
= 32.14
k=
( Dc / D )
Fcrw =
32.14"
69"
= 41.49
69"
9 "
16
= 71.96 ksi
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 48 of 62
-- 48 --
Check
2 Dcp
E
3.76
tw
Fyc
Find Dcp, the depth of the web in compression at Mp (compression rebar in the slab is ignored).
Pt = Fyt bt tt = (70ksi ) ( 21")(1") = 1, 470kip
Pw = Fyw Dtw = (50ksi )(69")(916 ") = 1,941kip
Pc = Fyc bc tc = (70ksi )(15")( 3 4 ") = 787.5kip
Ps = 0.85 f c'bs ts = (0.85)(4.5ksi )(109.5")(8.5") = 3,560kip
4,199kip > 3,560kip, the PNA is NOT in the slab.
Check Case I Pt + Pw Pc + Ps
?
NO
Check Case II Pt + Pw + Pc Ps
?
t P + P Ps
Y = c w t
+ 1
Pc
2
kip
kip
kip
kip
787.5
2
1
f S f Mn
3 l xt
0.1Dt = 7.925
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 49 of 62
-- 49 --
Dt
Determine Mp:
The distances from the component forces to the PNA are calculated.
8.5"
+ 0.3040" = 4.554"
2
69"
( 0.75" 0.3040") = 34.05"
dw =
2
1"
dt = 70.75" 0.3040" = 69.95"
2
ds =
2tc
787.5kip
2
2
=
( 0.3040") + ( 0.750" 0.3040") + ...
(2)(0.750")
8.804"
k-ft
M n = 15, 440k-ft 1.07 ( 0.7 )
= 15,320
79.25"
M u + 13 f l S xt f M n
O.K.
Note that the check of M n 1.3Rh M y has not been made in the above calculations. This
section would satisfy the Article B6.2 so this check doesnt need to be made.
Check the ductility requirement to prevent crushing of the slab:
?
D p 0.42 Dt
O.K.
The Section is Adequate for Positive Flexure at Stations 58.7 and 271.3 with 70ksi Flanges
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 50 of 62
-- 50 --
Check
2 Dc
E
5.70
tw
Fyc
The web is non-slender. Since the web is non-slender we have the option of using the provisions
in Appendix A to determine the moment capacity. I will first determine the capacity using the
provisions in 6.10.8, which will provide a somewhat conservative determination of the flexural
resistance.
1
f f Fnc
3 l
Per 6.10.1.1.1a, elastic stresses at any location in a composite section shall consist of the sum of
stresses caused by loads applied separately to the bare steel, short-term composite section, and
long-term composite section. In 6.10.1.1.1c, though, it states that for the Strength Limit, the
short-term and long-term composite sections shall consist of the bare steel and the longitudinal
rebar. In other words, for determining negative moment stresses over the pier, we can use the
factored moment above with the properties for the cracked section.
SCR
S BS
fbu = 1.25
k-ft
k-ft
k-ft
(7,109 k-ft )(12 inft ) (1.25)(1, 250 ) + (1.50)(2, 292 ) + (1.75)(4, 918 ) (12 inft )
fbu = 1.25
+
3
3
3,932 in
3,602 in
fbu = 71.13ksi
Since fbu is greater than Fyc, it is obvious that a strength computed based on the provisions
in 6.10.8 will not be adequate.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 51 of 62
-- 51 --
As it stands here, this girder is clearly not adequate over the pier. The compression flange is
overstressed as per the provisions in 6.10.8. There are still other options to explore, though, before
increasing the plate dimensions.
1. Since the web is non-slender for Section 2 in Negative Flexure, we have the option of using
the provisions in Appendix A6 to determine moment capacity. This would provide an
upper bound strength of Mp instead of My as was determined in 6.10.8.
2. The provisions in Appendix B6 allow for redistribution of negative moment from the region
near the pier to the positive moment region near mid-span for sections that satisfy stringent
compactness and stability criteria. If this section qualifies, as much as ~2,000k-ft may be able
to be redistributed from the pier to mid-span, which could enable the plastic moment
strength from Appendix A6 to be adequate. (This solution may even work with the flange
strength at 50ksi, but I doubt it)
Despite the fact that the girder appears to have failed our flexural capacity checks, lets look at the
shear capacity.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 52 of 62
-- 52 --
Vu Vn
For an unstiffened web,
Vn = Vcr = CV p
Check,
D
Ek
,
1.12
tw
Fyw
D 69"
=
= 122.7
tw 916 "
Since there are no transverse stiffeners, k = 5
C=
D
Ek
, elastic shear buckling of the web controls.
> 1.40
tw
Fyw
1.57 kE
1.57 (5)(29, 000ksi )
=
= 0.3026
2
2
(50ksi )
D Fyw 69"
9 "
16
tw
No Good.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 53 of 62
-- 53 --
k =5+
5
do
D
=5+
5
96"
69"
= 7.583
D
(29, 000ksi )(7.583)
(29, 000ksi )(7.583)
= 122.7 , 1.12
,
=
74.28
1.40
= 92.85
(50ksi )
(50ksi )
tw
Since
D
Ek
> 1.40
, elastic shear buckling of the web controls.
tw
Fyw
1.57 Ek
1.57 (29, 000ksi )(7.583)
C=
=
= 0.4589
2
2
(50ksi )
D Fyw 69"
9 "
16
tw
Vn = CV p = (1.00)(0.4589)(1,126 kip ) = 516.5kip
O.K.
This capacity is fine but we may be able to do better if we account for tension field action.
Try adding transverse stiffeners spaced at do = 12 = 144
k =5+
5
do
D
=5+
5
144"
69"
= 6.148
D
(29, 000ksi )(6.148)
(29, 000ksi )(6.148)
,
= 122.7 , 1.12
=
66.88
1.40
= 83.60
(50ksi )
(50ksi )
tw
Since
C=
D
Ek
, elastic shear buckling of the web controls.
> 1.40
tw
Fyw
1.57 Ek
1.57 (29, 000ksi )(6.148)
=
= 0.3721
2
2
(50ksi )
D Fyw 69"
9 "
16
tw
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 54 of 62
-- 54 --
With TFA:
Since
2 Dtw
(2)(69")( 916 ")
=
= 1.056 2.5 ,
( b fct fc + b ft t ft ) ( (21")(2 12 ") + (21")(1") )
0.87(1 C )
(0.87)(1
0.3721)
= (1,126kip ) 0.3721 +
Vn = V p C +
2
2
do
144"
1+
1+
69"
D
O.K.
This TFA strength is adequate near the pier but TFA is not permitted in the end panels.
The following stiffener configuration should provide adequate shear strength.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 55 of 62
-- 55 --
600
Strength I
400
Strength IV
Shear (kip)
200
-200
-400
-600
-800
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
Station (ft)
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 56 of 62
-- 56 --
ts
+ thaunch t flange
2
9.5"
=
+ 2.75" 0.75" = 6.75"
2
h=
ts
thaunch
tc
bc
h
4.0
d
6 12 "
= 7.429 4.0
7 "
8
OK
nZ r
Vsr
Vsr =
Vf Q
I
(6.10.10.1.2-1 & 3)
where:
n
Zr
Vsr
Vf
Q
I
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 57 of 62
-- 57 --
Zr = d 2
5.5d 2
2
(6.10.10.2-1)
= 34.5 4.28Log( N )
(6.10.10.2-2)
Z r = 2.105kip
Q = Atc d c
(109.5")( 9.5")
9.5"
58.19" = 2,511 in 3
QSection 1 =
1"+ 69"+ 2.75"+
8
2
(109.5")( 9.5")
9.5"
52.23" = 3, 481 in 3
QSection 2 =
2.5"+ 69"+ 2.75"+
8
2
I Section 1 = 140,500 in 4
Since the fatigue shear varies along the length of the bridge, the longitudinal distribution of shear studs
based on the Fatigue Limit also varies. These results are presented in a tabular format on a subsequent
page. To illustrate the computations, I have chosen the shear at the abutment as an example.
Vsr
( 0.7445 )
kip
inch
= 8.482
kip
inch
( 3) ( 2.105ksi )
in
row
( 4 ) ( 2.105ksi )
( 0.7453 )
kip
inch
in
= 11.31 row
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 58 of 62
-- 58 --
Strength Limit:
Qr = sc Qn
Qn = 0.5 Asc
sc = 0.85
f c' Ec Asc Fu
(6.10.10.4.3-1)
2
Asc = ( 7 8 ") = 0.6013 in 2
4
f c' = 4.5ksi
Since n = 8, Ec =
Es 29, 000ksi
=
= 3, 625ksi
8
n
Fu = 60ksi
Qn = ( 0.5 ) ( 0.6013 in 2 )
ksi
ksi
kip
kip
= 38.40 stud
36.08 stud
kip
kip
scQn = ( 0.85 ) ( 36.08 stud
) = 30.67 stud
n+ =
Pp
n =
Qr
Pp + Pn
Qr
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 59 of 62
-- 59 --
n+ =
Pp
Qr
3,979kip
= 129.7studs
kip
30.67 stud
129.7studs
= 44rows
studs
3 row
p=
Say 20"
p=
Say 24"
129.7studs
= 33rows
studs
4 row
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 60 of 62
-- 60 --
n =
Pp + Pn
Qr
198.4studs
= 67 rows
studs
3 row
p=
Say 16"
p=
Say 20"
198.4studs
= 50rows
studs
4 row
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 61 of 62
-- 61 --
This table represents that pitch of shear studs required for either 3 or 4 studs per row based on location in
the bridge.
3 Studs Per Row
Station
(ft)
0.0
14.7
29.3
44.0
58.7
73.3
88.0
102.7
117.3
132.0
135.7
139.3
143.0
146.7
150.3
154.0
157.7
161.3
165.0
168.7
172.3
176.0
179.7
183.3
187.0
190.7
194.3
198.0
212.7
227.3
242.0
256.7
271.3
286.0
300.7
315.3
330.0
Vf
(kip)
41.66
37.01
33.68
32.79
33.04
33.46
33.98
34.59
35.38
36.62
37.07
37.53
37.98
38.42
38.88
39.34
39.81
40.26
81.44
40.26
39.81
39.34
38.88
38.42
37.98
37.53
37.07
36.62
35.38
34.59
33.98
33.46
33.04
32.79
33.68
37.01
41.66
V sr
(in )
2,511
2,511
2,511
2,511
2,511
2,511
2,511
2,511
2,511
2,511
3,481
3,481
3,481
3,481
3,481
3,481
3,481
3,481
3,481
3,481
3,481
3,481
3,481
3,481
3,481
3,481
3,481
2,511
2,511
2,511
2,511
2,511
2,511
2,511
2,511
2,511
2,511
140,521
140,521
140,521
140,521
140,521
140,521
140,521
140,521
140,521
140,521
239,734
239,734
239,734
239,734
239,734
239,734
239,734
239,734
239,734
239,734
239,734
239,734
239,734
239,734
239,734
239,734
239,734
140,521
140,521
140,521
140,521
140,521
140,521
140,521
140,521
140,521
140,521
(in )
kip
( /in)
0.7444
0.6613
0.6018
0.5859
0.5904
0.5979
0.6071
0.6181
0.6323
0.6543
0.5383
0.5449
0.5514
0.5579
0.5645
0.5713
0.5780
0.5847
1.1826
0.5847
0.5780
0.5713
0.5645
0.5579
0.5514
0.5449
0.5383
0.6543
0.6323
0.6181
0.6071
0.5979
0.5904
0.5859
0.6018
0.6613
0.7444
p Fat
p Str
(in)
8.48
9.55
10.49
10.78
10.70
10.56
10.40
10.22
9.99
9.65
11.73
11.59
11.45
11.32
11.19
11.05
10.93
10.80
5.34
10.80
10.93
11.05
11.19
11.32
11.45
11.59
11.73
9.65
9.99
10.22
10.40
10.56
10.70
10.78
10.49
9.55
8.48
(in)
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
p max
(in)
8.48
9.55
10.49
10.78
10.70
10.56
10.40
10.22
9.99
9.65
11.73
11.59
11.45
11.32
11.19
11.05
10.93
10.80
5.34
10.80
10.93
11.05
11.19
11.32
11.45
11.59
11.73
9.65
9.99
10.22
10.40
10.56
10.70
10.78
10.49
9.55
8.48
p Fat
p Str
(in)
11.31
12.73
13.99
14.37
14.26
14.08
13.87
13.62
13.32
12.87
15.64
15.45
15.27
15.09
14.92
14.74
14.57
14.40
7.12
14.40
14.57
14.74
14.92
15.09
15.27
15.45
15.64
12.87
13.32
13.62
13.87
14.08
14.26
14.37
13.99
12.73
11.31
(in)
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
p max
(in)
11.31
12.73
13.99
14.37
14.26
14.08
13.87
13.62
13.32
12.87
15.64
15.45
15.27
15.09
14.92
14.74
14.57
14.40
7.12
14.40
14.57
14.74
14.92
15.09
15.27
15.45
15.64
12.87
13.32
13.62
13.87
14.08
14.26
14.37
13.99
12.73
11.31
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Page 62 of 62
-- 62 --
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 1 of 21
-- 63 --
G
2
G
3
G
4
G
5
G
6
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 2 of 21
-- 64 --
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July2007: Page 3 of 23
-- 65 --
2. LOAD CALCULATIONS:
DC dead loads (structural components) include:
Steel girder self weight (DC1)
Concrete deck self weight (DC1)
Haunch self weight (DC1)
Barrier (DC2)
DW dead loads (structural attachments) include:
Wearing surface (DW), Including FWS
2a. Dead Load Calculations
Steel Girder Self-Weight (DC1):
(a) Section 1
A = (14)(1.125) + (68)(0.6875) + (22)(1.5) = 95.5 in2
490pcf
per girder
(1.15 ) = 373.7 lbs
Wsection1 = 95.5 in 2
ft
(12 in )2
ft
(b) Section 2
A = (14)(2) + (68)(0.5625) + (22)(2) = 110.25 in2
490pcf
per girder
(1.15 ) = 431.4 lbs
Wsection1 = 110.3 in 2
ft
(12 in )2
ft
(c) Section 3
490pcf
per girder
(1.15 ) = 463.7 lbs
Wsection1 = 118.5 in 2
ft
(12 in )2
ft
( 2 )( 40.17 ') ( 373.7 lbsft ) + ( 2 )(18.0 ') ( 431.4 lbsft ) + ( 50.0 ') ( 463.7 lbsft )
166.3'
= 413.3 lbs
ft
( ft )
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July2007: Page 4 of 23
-- 66 --
150pcf
per girder
= 94.33 lbs
Whaunch = (14 )( 4 ) + 2 ( ( 12 ) ( 9 '')( 4 '') )
ft
(12 in )2
ft
Wbarriers
( 2 each ) ( 640plf )
per girder
= 213.3 lbs
=
ft
6 girders
Wwearing_surface =
( 61.0') ( 60psf )
6 Girders
per girder
= 610.0 lbs
ft
The moment effect due to dead loads was found using an FE model composed of six frame elements to
model the bridge (a node was placed at mid-span). This data was input into Excel to be combined with
data from moving live load analyses performed in SAP 2000. DC1 dead loads were applied to the noncomposite section (bare steel). All live loads were applied to the short-term composite section (1n = 8).
DW (barriers) and DC2 (wearing surface) dead loads were applied to the long-term composite section
(3n = 24).
The maximum moments at mid-span are easily computed since the bridge is statically determinate.
M DC1,Steel
= 1, 429k-ft
=
=
8
8
M DC1, Deck
2
166.3' )
wL2 (1, 267 lbs
ft ) (
= 4,379k-ft
=
=
8
M DC 2, Barriers
M DW
= 737.4k-ft
=
=
2
166.3' )
wL2 ( 610.0 lbs
ft ) (
= 2,109k-ft
=
=
8
8
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July2007: Page 5 of 23
-- 67 --
The maximum shear forces at the ends of the girder are also easily computed.
lbs
wL ( 413.3 ft ) (166.3' )
kip
VDC1,Steel =
=
= 34.37
2
2
VDC1, Deck
lbs
wL (1, 267 ft ) (166.3' )
kipt
=
= 105.4
=
2
2
lbs
wL ( 213.3 ft ) (166.3' )
kip
VDC 2, Barriers =
=
= 17.74
2
2
lbs
wL ( 610.0 ft ) (166.3' )
kip
VDW =
=
= 50.72
2
2
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July2007: Page 6 of 23
-- 68 --
3) For negative moment between points of contraflexure only: 90% of the effect of a truck-train
combined with 90% of the effect of the lane loading. The truck train consists of two design
trucks (shown below) spaced a minimum of 50 between the lead axle of one truck and the rear
axle of the other truck. The distance between the two 32kip axles should be taken as 14 for each
truck. The points of contraflexure were taken as the field splices at 132 and 198 from the left
end of the bridge. (HL-93S in SAP)
All live load calculations were performed in SAP 2000 using a beam line analysis. The nominal
moment data from SAP was then input into Excel. An Impact Factor of 1.33 was applied to the
truck and tandem loads within SAP.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July2007: Page 7 of 23
-- 69 --
4,000
Tandem
Moment (kip-ft)
2,000
-2,000
-4,000
-6,000
0
30
60
90
120
150
Station (ft)
HL-93M
HL-93K
HL-93S
Before proceeding, these live-load moments will be confirmed with an influence line analysis.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July2007: Page 8 of 23
-- 70 --
kip
25
25
Tandem:
kip
32
8
kip
32
kip
Single Truck:
0.640kip/ft
Lane
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
105
120
135
150
165
Station (ft)
Tandem:
Single Truck:
Lane Load:
kip
k-ft
kip
kip
kip
k-ft
kip
k-ft
kip
k-ft
kip
k-ft
k-ft
kip
kip
k-ft
kip
k-ft
k-ft
(IM)(Tandem) + Lane:
GOVERNS
The case of two trucks is not considered here because it is only used when computing negative moments.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July2007: Page 9 of 23
-- 71 --
Based on the influence line analysis, we can say that the moments obtained from SAP appear to be
reasonable and will be used for design.
Before these Service moments can be factored and combined, we must compute the distribution factors.
Since the distribution factors are a function of Kg, the longitudinal stiffness parameter, we must first
compute the sections properties of the girders.
14"
= (12 )( 8.5") +
= 109 ''
12ts +
2
2
Therefore, bs = 109
For computing the section properties shown on the two pages that follow, reinforcing steel in the deck
was ignored for short-term and long-term composite calculations but was included for the cracked
section.
Note: At this point one should also check the effective of the outside girders as well. For this
example, however, I will proceed sing the effective width for the interior girders.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July2007: Page 10 of 23
-- 72 --
Ay
Ix
Ad2
IX
Top Flange
1.1250
14.00
15.75
70.06
1,103.48
1.66
-40.87
26,308
26,310
Web
Bot Flange
0.6875
1.5000
68.00
22.00
46.75
33.00
35.50
0.75
1,659.63 18,014.33
24.75
6.19
-6.31
28.44
1,860
26,696
19,874
26,702
2,787.86
ITotal =
72,886
29.19
SBS1,top =
1,759
SBS1,bot =
2,497
95.50
Y=
Ay
Ix
Ad2
IX
Slab
8.5000
109.00
115.81
74.88
8,671.46
697.29
-20.65
49,365
50,062
Haunch
Top Flange
0.0000
1.1250
14.0000
14.0000
0.00
15.75
70.63
70.06
0.00
1,103.48
0.00
1.66
-16.40
-15.83
0
3,948
0
3,950
Web
Bot Flange
0.6875
1.5000
68.0000
22.0000
46.75
33.00
35.50
0.75
1,659.63 18,014.33
24.75
6.19
18.73
53.48
16,399
94,381
34,414
94,387
11,459.32
ITotal =
182,813
54.23
SST1,top =
11,150
SST1,bot =
3,371
211.31
n=
8.00
Y=
Ay
Ix
Ad2
IX
Slab
8.5000
109.00
38.60
74.88
2,890.49
232.43
-32.53
40,856
41,089
Haunch
0.0000
14.00
0.00
70.63
0.00
0.00
-28.28
Top Flange
1.1250
14.0000
15.75
70.06
1,103.48
1.66
-27.72
12,102
12,104
Web
Bot Flange
0.6875
1.5000
68.0000
22.0000
46.75
33.00
35.50
0.75
1,659.63 18,014.33
24.75
6.19
6.84
41.59
2,189
57,089
20,203
57,095
5,678.35
ITotal =
130,491
42.34
SLT1,top =
4,614
SLT1,bot =
3,082
134.10
n=
24.00
Y=
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July2007: Page 11 of 23
-- 73 --
Ay
Ix
Ad2
IX
Top Flange
2.0000
14.00
28.00
71.00
1,988.00
9.33
-40.08
44,978
44,987
Web
Bot Flange
0.5625
2.0000
68.00
22.00
38.25
44.00
36.00
1.00
1,377.00 14,739.00
44.00
14.67
-5.08
29.92
987
39,391
15,726
39,405
3,409.00
ITotal =
100,119
30.92
SBS1,top =
2,437
SBS1,bot =
3,238
110.25
Y=
Ay
Ix
Ad2
IX
Slab
8.5000
109.00
115.81
76.25
8,830.70
697.29
-22.11
56,600
57,297
Haunch
Top Flange
0.0000
2.0000
14.0000
14.0000
0.00
28.00
72.00
71.00
0.00
1,988.00
0.00
9.33
-17.86
-16.86
0
7,956
0
7,966
Web
Bot Flange
0.5625
2.0000
68.0000
22.0000
38.25
44.00
36.00
1.00
1,377.00 14,739.00
44.00
14.67
18.14
53.14
12,591
124,264
27,330
124,279
12,239.70
ITotal =
216,871
54.14
SST1,top =
12,145
SST1,bot =
4,006
226.06
n=
8.00
Y=
Ay
Ix
Ad2
IX
Slab
8.5000
109.00
38.60
76.25
2,943.57
232.43
-33.57
43,514
43,746
Haunch
0.0000
14.00
0.00
72.00
0.00
0.00
-29.32
Top Flange
2.0000
14.0000
28.00
71.00
1,988.00
9.33
-28.32
22,462
22,472
Web
Bot Flange
0.5625
2.0000
68.0000
22.0000
38.25
44.00
36.00
1.00
1,377.00 14,739.00
44.00
14.67
6.68
41.68
1,705
76,425
16,444
76,439
6,352.57
ITotal =
159,101
42.68
SLT1,top =
5,426
SLT1,bot =
3,728
148.85
n=
24.00
Y=
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July2007: Page 12 of 23
-- 74 --
Ay
Ix
Ad2
IX
Top Flange
2.0000
14.00
28.00
71.38
1,998.50
9.33
-42.25
49,970
49,980
Web
Bot Flange
0.5625
2.3750
68.00
22.00
38.25
52.25
36.38
1.19
1,391.34 14,739.00
62.05
24.56
-7.25
27.94
2,008
40,796
16,747
40,820
3,451.89
ITotal =
107,546
29.13
SBS1,top =
2,487
SBS1,bot =
3,692
118.50
Y=
Ay
Ix
Ad2
IX
Slab
8.5000
109.00
115.81
76.63
8,874.13
697.29
-24.02
66,819
67,516
Haunch
Top Flange
0.0000
2.0000
14.0000
14.0000
0.00
28.00
72.38
71.38
0.00
1,998.50
0.00
9.33
-19.77
-18.77
0
9,865
0
9,874
Web
Bot Flange
0.5625
2.3750
68.0000
22.0000
38.25
52.25
36.38
1.19
1,391.34 14,739.00
62.05
24.56
16.23
51.42
10,076
138,137
24,815
138,161
12,326.02
ITotal =
240,366
52.61
SST1,top =
12,158
SST1,bot =
4,569
234.31
n=
8.00
Y=
Ay
Ix
Ad2
IX
Slab
8.5000
109.00
38.60
76.63
2,958.04
232.43
-35.82
49,544
49,777
Haunch
0.0000
14.00
0.00
72.38
0.00
0.00
-31.57
Top Flange
2.0000
14.0000
28.00
71.38
1,998.50
9.33
-30.57
26,174
26,184
Web
Bot Flange
0.5625
2.3750
68.0000
22.0000
38.25
52.25
36.38
1.19
1,391.34 14,739.00
62.05
24.56
4.43
39.61
749
81,990
15,488
82,015
6,409.93
ITotal =
173,463
40.80
SLT1,top =
5,494
SLT1,bot =
4,251
157.10
n=
24.00
Y=
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July2007: Page 13 of 23
-- 75 --
DFM1,Int,Sec1
0.4
0.3
S S Kg
= 0.06 +
3
14 L 12 LtS
0.1
K g = n ( I + Aeg2 )
K g = 2, 422, 000 in 4
0.4
DFM1,Int,Sec1
11.33' 11.33'
= 0.06 +
14 166.3'
0.3
2, 422, 000 in 4
0.1
DFM1,Int,Sec1 = 0.4994
Interior Girder - Two or More Lanes Loaded:
DFM2,Int,Sec1
0.4
0.3
S S Kg
= 0.075 +
3
9.5 L 12 LtS
DFM2,Int,Sec1
11.33' 11.33'
= 0.075 +
9.5 166.3'
0.6
0.2
0.1
2, 422, 000 in 4
0.1
DFM2,Int,Sec1 = 0.7703
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July2007: Page 14 of 23
-- 76 --
DFM 1,Ext,Sec1 =
8.5'
= 0.7500
11.33'
Multiple Presence:
DFM1,Ext,Sec1 = (1.2) (0.7500) = 0.9000
de
9.1
2.167 '
e = 0.77 +
= 1.008
9.1
e = 0.77 +
4b. Section 2:
Interior Girder One Lane Loaded:
0.4
0.3
S S Kg
DFM1,Int,Sec2 = 0.06 +
3
14 L 12 LtS
0.1
K g = n ( I + Aeg2 )
K g = 2,819, 000 in 4
0.4
DFM1,Int,Sec2
11.33' 11.33'
= 0.06 +
14 166.3'
0.3
2,819, 000 in 4
0.1
DFM1,Int,Sec2 = 0.5061
Single-Span Bridge Example
ODOT LRFD Short Course - Steel
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July2007: Page 15 of 23
-- 77 --
DFM2,Int,Sec2
DFM2,Int,Sec2
0.1
0.6
0.2
4
3
9.5 166.3' (12 )(166.3')( 8.5")
= 0.7809
0.1
DFM2,Ext,Sec2 = e DFM2,Int,Sec2
e = 1.008 (same as before)
DFM2,Ext,Sec2 =(1.008) (0.7809) = 0.7871
4c. Section 3:
Interior Girder One Lane Loaded:
S
= 0.06 +
14
K g = n I + Aeg2
0.4
S
L
0.3
)
(
Kg
3
12 LtS
0.1
K g = 3, 230, 000 in 4
DFM 1, Int , Sec 3
11.33'
= 0.06 +
14
0.4
11.33'
166.3'
0.3
3
(12 )(166.3')( 8.5")
3, 230, 000 in 4
0.1
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July2007: Page 16 of 23
-- 78 --
S
= 0.075 +
9.5
S
L
11.33'
= 0.075 +
9.5
0.6
0.3
Kg
3
12 LtS
11.33'
166.3'
0.2
0.1
3, 230, 000 in 4
0.1
DFM2,Ext,Sec3 = e DFM2,Int,Sec3
e = 1.008 (same as before)
DFM2,Ext,Sec3 =(1.008) (0.7906) = 0.7969
NL
DF
Ext , Min
NL
Nb
X Ext e
Nb
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July2007: Page 17 of 23
-- 79 --
( 28.33') ( 25.5')
1
+
= 0.4881
6 2 ( 28.33')2 + (17.0 ')2 + ( 5.667 ' )2
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July2007: Page 18 of 23
-- 80 --
# Lanes
Loaded
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
Positive Moment
Interior
Exterior
0.4994
0.9000 0.5857
0.7703
0.7765 0.8250
0.7703
0.7765 0.8589
0.5061
0.9000 0.5857
0.7809
0.7871 0.8250
0.7809
0.7871 0.8589
0.5122
0.9000 0.5857
0.7906
0.7969 0.8250
0.7906
0.7969 0.8589
Multiplying the live load moments by this distribution factor of 0.9000 yields the table of nominal
girder moments shown below.
LL+
(k-ft)
0.0
986.5
1868.0
2645.5
3319.1
3889.3
4404.3
4795.1
5054.9
5202.6
5238.6
5238.5
5202.6
5055.0
4795.7
4795.2
4404.5
3890.2
3889.5
3319.4
2645.7
1868.1
986.6
1.1
Nominal Moments
LLDC1
(k-ft)
(k-ft)
0.0
0.0
0.0
1086.2
0.0
2064.8
0.0
2935.8
0.0
3699.2
0.0
4355.1
0.0
4959.7
0.0
5424.7
0.0
5729.3
0.0
5912.1
0.0
5973.0
0.0
5973.0
0.0
5911.6
0.0
5728.3
0.0
5423.3
0.0
5423.3
0.0
4957.8
0.0
4352.6
0.0
4352.6
0.0
3696.9
0.0
2933.8
0.0
2063.3
0.0
1085.3
0.0
0.0
DC2
(k-ft)
0.0
135.6
257.4
365.5
459.8
540.3
614.2
670.8
707.8
730.0
737.4
737.4
729.9
707.7
670.6
670.6
614.0
540.0
540.0
459.5
365.2
257.2
135.5
0.0
DW
(k-ft)
0.0
457.7
869.0
1233.7
1552.0
1823.9
2073.3
2264.3
2389.1
2464.0
2489.0
2489.0
2463.8
2388.7
2263.7
2263.7
2072.4
1822.9
1822.9
1551.1
1232.9
868.3
457.3
0.0
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July2007: Page 19 of 23
-- 81 --
Service II:
Fatigue:
0.75(LL + IM)
Strength II is not considered since this deals with special permit loads. Strength III and V are not
considered as they include wind effects, which will be handled separately as needed. Strength IV is
considered but is not expected to govern since it addresses situations with high dead load that come into
play for longer spans. Extreme Event load combinations are not included as they are also beyond the
scope of this example. Service I again applies to wind loads and is not considered and Service III and
Service IV correspond to tension in prestressed concrete elements and are therefore not included in this
example.
In addition to the factors shown above, a load modifier, , was applied as is shown below.
Q = i i Qi
is taken as the product of D, R, and I, and is taken as not less than 0.95. For this example,
D, R, and I are taken as 1.00.
Using these load combinations, the shear and moment envelopes shown on the following pages
were developed.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July2007: Page 20 of 23
-- 82 --
Station
(ft)
0.0
8.0
16.1
24.1
32.1
40.2
49.2
58.2
66.5
74.8
83.1
83.1
91.5
99.8
108.1
108.1
117.1
126.1
126.1
134.2
142.2
150.2
158.3
166.3
LL+
(k-ft)
0.0
1726.3
3268.9
4629.6
5808.5
6806.2
7707.5
8391.4
8846.1
9104.5
9167.5
9167.4
9104.6
8846.3
8392.4
8391.6
7707.8
6807.8
6806.6
5808.9
4630.0
3269.2
1726.5
1.9
LL(k-ft)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Strength I Moments
DC1
DC2
(k-ft)
(k-ft)
0.0
0.0
1357.7
169.5
2581.0
321.8
3669.7
456.9
4624.0
574.7
5443.9
675.4
6199.7
767.8
6780.8
838.5
7161.6
884.7
7390.1
912.5
7466.3
921.7
7466.3
921.7
7389.5
912.4
7160.4
884.6
6779.1
838.3
6779.1
838.3
6197.3
767.5
5440.8
675.0
5440.8
675.0
4621.1
574.4
3667.2
456.5
2579.1
321.5
1356.7
169.4
0.0
0.0
DW
(k-ft)
0.0
686.6
1303.4
1850.6
2328.1
2735.8
3109.9
3396.5
3583.7
3696.0
3733.5
3733.5
3695.7
3583.1
3395.6
3395.6
3108.7
2734.3
2734.3
2326.6
1849.3
1302.5
686.0
0.0
Total +
(k-ft)
0.0
3940.1
7475.1
10606.8
13335.3
15661.3
17784.8
19407.2
20476.2
21103.1
21289.0
21288.9
21102.2
20474.4
19405.3
19404.5
17781.2
15657.9
15656.7
13331.0
10603.1
7472.2
3938.5
1.9
Station
(ft)
0.0
7.2
14.5
21.7
28.9
36.2
43.4
50.6
57.8
65.1
72.3
79.5
86.8
94.0
101.2
108.5
115.7
122.9
130.1
137.4
144.6
151.8
159.1
166.3
DC1
(k-ft)
0.0
1629.3
3097.2
4403.7
5548.8
6532.6
7439.6
8137.0
8593.9
8868.1
8959.5
8959.5
8867.4
8592.5
8134.9
8134.9
7436.7
6529.0
6529.0
5545.4
4400.7
3094.9
1628.0
0.0
Strength IV Moments
DC2
DW
(k-ft)
(k-ft)
0.0
0.0
203.4
686.6
386.1
1303.4
548.2
1850.6
689.7
2328.1
810.5
2735.8
921.3
3109.9
1006.2
3396.5
1061.7
3583.7
1095.0
3696.0
1106.1
3733.5
1106.1
3733.5
1094.9
3695.7
1061.5
3583.1
1005.9
3395.6
1005.9
3395.6
920.9
3108.7
810.0
2734.3
810.0
2734.3
689.3
2326.6
547.9
1849.3
385.9
1302.5
203.2
686.0
0.0
0.0
Total +
(k-ft)
0.0
2519.2
4786.7
6802.5
8566.6
10078.9
11470.8
12539.7
13239.3
13659.1
13799.1
13799.1
13658.0
13237.1
12536.4
12536.4
11466.3
10073.3
10073.3
8561.2
6797.8
4783.2
2517.2
0.0
Total (k-ft)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total (k-ft)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July2007: Page 21 of 23
-- 83 --
Station
(ft)
0.0
7.2
14.5
21.7
28.9
36.2
43.4
50.6
57.8
65.1
72.3
79.5
86.8
94.0
101.2
108.5
115.7
122.9
130.1
137.4
144.6
151.8
159.1
166.3
LL+
(k-ft)
0.0
1282.4
2428.3
3439.2
4314.9
5056.0
5725.6
6233.6
6571.4
6763.4
6810.2
6810.1
6763.4
6571.5
6234.4
6233.8
5725.8
5057.2
5056.3
4315.2
3439.4
2428.5
1282.5
1.4
LL(k-ft)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Service II Moments
DC1
DC2
(k-ft)
(k-ft)
0.0
0.0
1086.2
135.6
2064.8
257.4
2935.8
365.5
3699.2
459.8
4355.1
540.3
4959.7
614.2
5424.7
670.8
5729.3
707.8
5912.1
730.0
5973.0
737.4
5973.0
737.4
5911.6
729.9
5728.3
707.7
5423.3
670.6
5423.3
670.6
4957.8
614.0
4352.6
540.0
4352.6
540.0
3696.9
459.5
2933.8
365.2
2063.3
257.2
1085.3
135.5
0.0
0.0
DW
(k-ft)
0.0
457.7
869.0
1233.7
1552.0
1823.9
2073.3
2264.3
2389.1
2464.0
2489.0
2489.0
2463.8
2388.7
2263.7
2263.7
2072.4
1822.9
1822.9
1551.1
1232.9
868.3
457.3
0.0
Total +
(k-ft)
0.0
2961.9
5619.5
7974.2
10026.0
11775.3
13372.8
14593.4
15397.6
15869.4
16009.6
16009.5
15868.7
15396.3
14591.9
14591.3
13370.0
11772.7
11771.8
10022.6
7971.3
5617.3
2960.7
1.4
Total (k-ft)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July2007: Page 22 of 23
-- 84 --
Moment (kip-ft)
20,000
15,000
Strength IV
10,000
5,000
0
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
Station (ft)
k-ft
15,000
Moment (kip-ft)
12,500
10,000
7,500
5,000
2,500
0
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
Station (ft)
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July2007: Page 23 of 23
-- 85 --
-- 86 --
Consider the truss bridge shown in Figure 1 below. The truss is simply supported with a span
length of 1120 and a width (c-c of the trusses) of 196. The truss is made up of 7 panels
that are each 16-0 in length. Floor beams span between the truss panel points perpendicular to
traffic and support stringers that span 16-0 in the direction of traffic. Finally, the
noncomposite W10 x 88 stringers support a 6 thick reinforced concrete deck. The simply
supported stringers (6 across in each panel) are spaced at 3 - 6 laterally.
1) Determine maximum and minimum axial forces in members 1-2, 1-4, 9-11, 9-10, and 10-13
due to an HL-93 Loading.
2) Determine the maximum moment in the stringer members due to the HL-93 Loading
The entire truss superstructure is made up of W14 x 109 members except for the bottom chord,
which is made up of MC 12 x 35 members.
You may assume that the trucks drive down the center of the bridge (they really do, by the way)
and as a result, the truck loads are approximately equally distributed between the trusses. To be
on the safe side, however, assume that each truss carries 75% of the single lane. Model the truss
as a determinate structure with pinned joints even though the actual truss has very few joints that
are truly pinned. You may use a computer program for your truss analysis if you wish. I would
suggest that you use SAP2000, Visual Analysis, or another similar FE package to model the
truss.
Disregard the lower limit of L = 20 on the span length for computing distribution factors for the
stringer members. Think about what is appropriate for the multiple presence factor.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 1 of 17
-- 87 --
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 2 of 17
-- 88 --
Compute the Maximum and Minimum Forces in Critical Members of the Truss:
The following Influence Lines were obtained from SAP 2000:
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 3 of 17
-- 89 --
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 4 of 17
-- 90 --
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 5 of 17
-- 91 --
Tandem:
kip
kip 96' 4'
kip
kip
(25 ) + (25 ) 96' ( 1.415 kip ) = 69.28
16' 14'
kip
kip 96' 14'
kip
kip
Truck: (8kip )
+ (32 ) + (32 )
( 1.415 kip ) = 85.38
16'
96'
Lane:
(IM)(Truck) + Lane:
GOVERNS
P1-2 = -123.2kip
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 6 of 17
-- 92 --
Tandem:
kip
kip 96' 4'
kip
kip
(25 ) + (25 ) 96' (1.127 kip ) = 55.18
16' 14'
kip
kip 96' 14'
kip
kip
Truck: (8kip )
+ (32 ) + (32 )
(1.127 kip ) = 68.00
16'
96'
Lane:
(IM)(Truck) + Lane:
GOVERNS
P1-4 = 98.12kip
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 7 of 17
-- 93 --
Tandem:
kip
kip 64' 4'
kip
kip
(25 ) + (25 ) 64' ( 2.254 kip ) = 109.2
48' 14'
kip
kip 64' 14'
kip
kip
Truck: (8kip )
+ (32 ) + (32 )
( 2.254 kip ) = 141.3
48'
64'
Lane:
(IM)(Truck) + Lane:
GOVERNS
P9-11 = -201.5kip
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 8 of 17
-- 94 --
Member 9-10 of the truss is a zero force member. It may see some bending moment due to its rigid
connection to the floor beam but it will not experience a net axial force due to live load.
P9-10 = 0.000kip
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 9 of 17
-- 95 --
Tandem:
48' 12'
kip
kip
kip
kip
Truck: (8kip )
+ (32 ) + (32 ) (1.972 kip ) = 138.0
48'
Lane:
(IM)(Truck) + Lane:
GOVERNS
P10-13 = 198.2kip
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 10 of 17
-- 96 --
25kip
Tandem:
32kip
8kip
32kip
Truck:
0.640kip/ft
Lane:
0.5128kip/kip
IL Mem 10-11:
10
13
16
19
21
0.5124kip/kip
Tandem:
kip
kip 48' 4'
kip
kip
(25 ) + (25 ) 48' ( 0.5128 kip ) = 24.57
48' 28'
kip 48' 14'
kip
kip
kip
Truck: (8kip )
+ (32 )
+ (32 ) ( 0.5128 kip ) = 29.74
48'
48'
Lane:
(IM)(Truck) + Lane:
GOVERNS
P+10-11 = 36.56kip
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 11 of 17
-- 97 --
25kip
Tandem:
32kip
32kip
8kip
Truck:
0.640kip/ft
Lane:
0.5128kip/kip
IL Mem 10-11:
10
13
16
19
21
0.5124kip/kip
Tandem:
kip
kip 48' 4'
kip
kip
(25 ) + (25 ) 48' ( 0.5124 kip ) = 24.55
48' 28'
kip 48' 14'
kip
kip
kip
Truck: (8kip )
+ (32 )
+ (32 ) ( 0.5124 kip ) = 29.72
48'
48'
Lane:
(IM)(Truck) + Lane:
GOVERNS
P-10-11 = -36.53kip
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 12 of 17
-- 98 --
Max Tension
0.000kip
98.12kip
0.000kip
0.000kip
198.2kip
36.56kip
Max Compression
123.2kip
0.000kip
201.5kip
0.000kip
0.000kip
36.53kip
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 13 of 17
-- 99 --
Compute the Moment Distribution Factor for the Stringers in the Floor System:
Interior Girder
One Lane Loaded:
S S Kg
= 0.06 +
3
14 L 12 Lt s
0.4
DFM 1, Int
0.3
0.1
K g = n( I + Aeg2 )
K g = (8)(534 in 4 + (25.9 in 2 )(8.40") 2 )
K g =18,890 in 4
4
3.5' 3.5' 18,890 in
= 0.06 +
3
14 16 ' 12(16 ')(6.0")
0.4
DFM 1, Int
0.3
0.1
Exterior Girder
One Lane Loaded:
( P / 2 ) (1.75') = 0.2500 P
(3.50 ')
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 14 of 17
-- 100 --
NL
DF
Ext , Min
NL
Nb
X Ext e
Nb
3'-0"
3'-0"
P/2
P/2
1'-9"
5'-3"
8'-9"
DF
M 1, Ext , Min
1
6
(4.00 ')(8.75')
(2) (8.75') 2 + (5.25') 2 + (1.75') 2
= 0.3299
The Multiple Presence Factor would generally be applied but in this case, there is only a
single design lane so it is not used.
Interior Stringer:
Exterior Stringer (Lever Rule):
Exterior Stringer (Minimum):
DFM1,Int = 0.3965
DFM1, Ext = 0.2500
DFM1, Ext = 0.3299
For simplicity, take the moment distribution factor as 0.3965 for all stringers.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 15 of 17
-- 101 --
Compute the Maximum Bending Moment in the Stringers of the Floor System:
25kip
25kip
Tandem:
32kip
Truck:
0.640kip/ft
Lane:
4.00k-ft/kip
IL Moment
@ CL Stringer
4 spaces @ 4'-0" = 16'-0"
Tandem:
kip
kip 8' 4'
k-ft
k-ft
(25 ) + (25 ) 8' ( 4.00 kip ) = 150.0
In this case, since the axle spacing is substantial relative to the beam length, we should consider the more
general approach for computing maximum moment. For two equal point loads, P, separated by a
distance, a, the maximum bending moment in a simply supported span is:
when a < 0.5858L,
2
P
a
M Max =
L
2L
2
when a 0.5858L
M Max =
PL
4
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 16 of 17
-- 102 --
Tandem:
M Max
(25kip )
4'
k-ft
=
(an increase of 2.067%)
16' = 153.1
(2)(16')
2
Truck: M Max =
(32kip )(16')
= 128.0k-ft
(4)
(no change)
(IM)(Truck) + Lane:
GOVERNS
MStringer = 88.86k-ft
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 17 of 17
-- 103 --
-- 104 --
1.5"
1.5"
1"
3"
1.5"
3"
I min
bt 3
t2
=
=
= 0.2887"
12bt
12
A
3"
rmin =
3"
3"
3"
Pn = Fu Ae = Fu U An
(1.5") 2
An = 6" (2) ( 7 8 "+ 1 8 ") +
(1")
4(3.0")
= 4.188 in 2
Pn = (0.80)(272.2kip) = 217.8kip
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 1 of 1
-- 105 --
3"
6"
3"
Pn = (0.95)(317.2kip) = 301.3kip
C12 x 30
Pn = Fu Ae = Fu U An
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 1 of 2
-- 106 --
Side Note:
Note that if the AISC shear lag provisions were used that Case 2 from AISC Table D3.1
would apply:
U = 1
x
0.674"
= 1
= 0.9251
9.00"
L
In this case, however, the design strength is unaffected since gross yielding governs.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 2 of 2
-- 107 --
Determine the design strength of the W10x60 member of M270-50 steel. As is shown, the
member is connected to two gusset plates one on each flange. The end connection has two lines
of 3/4 diameter bolts in each flange - five in each line.
Gusset Plates
W10 x 60
Section A-A
A
5 spaces @ 3
Solution:
L
rmin
L
140
2.57"
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 1 of 2
-- 108 --
Check b f 2 3 d
(10.1") ( 2 3 )(10.2")
OK
U = 0.90 since bf > 2/3d and there are 3 fasteners in the direction of stress.
Pn = (65ksi)(0.90)(15.22 in2) = 890.4kip
Pn = (0.80)(890.4kip) = 712.3kip
Net Section Fracture Governs - Pn =712kip
Side Note:
Note that if the AISC shear lag provisions were used that Case 7a from AISC Table D3.1
would apply:
x
Check
bf 2 3 d
?
(10.1") ( 2 3 )(10.2")
OK
U = 0.90
Alternatively, Table D3.1 Case 2 can be applied:
U = 1
x
0.884"
= 1
= 0.9263
L
12.0"
Pn = (0.80)(916.4kip) = 733.1kip
Since Net Section Fracture governs the capacity of this member, the overall design
strength of the member would be increased to 733kip.
ODOT-LRFD Short Course - Steel
AASHTO Tension Member Example #3
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 2 of 2
-- 109 --
An L6x4x1/2, M270-36, is welded to a gusset plate. The long leg of the angle is attached using
two, 8 long fillet welds. Compute the strength of the angle in tension.
Solution:
x
0.981"
= 1
= 0.8774
L
8.0"
Pn = (0.80)(241.7kip) = 193.4kip
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 1 of 1
-- 110 --
bf
2t f
E
Fy
h ?
E
k
tw
Fy
29, 000
= 13.5 OK
50
29, 000
= 35.9
50
f = 6.41 (Tabulated)
6.41 0.56
w = 25.4 (Tabulated)
25.4 1.49
OK
6.04"
r x
OK
2.48"
r y
OK
Since the effective slenderness ratio is larger for the y axis than the x axis, y-axis buckling will
govern.
2
2
ksi
KL Fy 96.77 50
=
=
= 1.636
ksi
r y E 29, 000
(6.9.4.1-3)
(6.9.4.1-1)
Pn = (0.90)(549.6kip)
Pn = 495kip
ODOT-LRFD Short Course - Steel
AASHTO Compression Member Example #1
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 1 of 1
-- 111 --
Compute the axial compressive design strength based on flexural buckling (no torsional or
flexural-torsional buckling). Assume that the cross-sectional elements are connected such that
the built-up shape is fully effective. All plates are 4 thick.
Solution:
r=
Ix =
bh3
+ Ad 2
12
2
( 4") ( 30"- ( 2 4") )3
( 36")( 4")3
30" 4"
= 56,150 in 4
= 2
+ ( 36" 4")
+ 2
12
2
12
hb3
+ Ad 2
12
2
( 30"- ( 2 4") ) ( 4")3
( 4")( 36")3
36" 4"
= 2
+ ( 30"- ( 2 4") ) 4"
+ 2
12
12
2
4
= 76,390 in
Iy =
rx =
Ix
56,150 in 4
=
= 11.0 in
As
464.0 in 2
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 1 of 2
-- 112 --
(6.9.4.2-1)
7.00 1.40
29, 000ksi
= 33.72
50ksi
OK
where:
K = 0.8
(Section 4.6.2.5)
in
Lx = Ly = 40 ft 12 ft = 480"
2
KL Fy 34.91
50ksi
=
=
= 0.2129
ksi
rs E 29, 000
(6.9.4.1-3)
kip
(6.9.4.1-1)
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 2 of 2
-- 113 --
Determine the effective length factor, K, for column AB in the frame shown below. Column AB
is a W10x88 made of A992 steel. W16x36 beams frame into joint A and W16x77 beams frame
into joint B. The frame is unbraced and all connections are rigid. Consider only buckling in the
plane of the page about the sections strong axes.
W16 x 36
L=24'
B
W10 x 88
L=14'
8 @ 14'
W16 x 77
L=24'
4 @ 24'
Solution:
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 1 of 2
-- 114 --
GB
GA
(2)(534 in 4 )
I
L
(14 ')
= 3.065
C
GA =
=
4
I
in )
L 23 (2)(448
(24 ')
G
(2)(534 in 4 )
I
L
(14 ')
= 1.237
C
GB =
=
4
I
2 (2)(1,110 in )
L 3 (24 ')
G
K=
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 2 of 2
-- 115 --
10"
9"
Solution:
Flange:
b?
E
29, 000ksi
0.56
= 0.56
= 15.89 OK
t
Fy
36ksi
Web:
b d 2t f 10" (2)(0.436")
=
=
= 38.03
t
tw
0.240"
b?
E
29, 000ksi
1.49
= 1.49
= 42.29 OK
t
Fy
36ksi
4
2 9"
IY = (2) 2.27 in + (4.48 in ) 0.634" = 138.5 in 4
2
rX =
IX
134.6 in 4
=
= 3.88"
8.96 in 2
A
rY =
IY
138.5 in 4
=
= 3.93"
8.96 in 2
A
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 1 of 3
-- 116 --
Slenderness Ratios:
(20 ')(12 inft )
KL
=
= 61.86
r X 3.88"
=
= 61.07
r Y 3.93"
It appears as though X axis buckling will govern but since the battens will be subjected to
shear if the section buckles about its Y axis, this slenderness ratio must be modified.
Batten Spacing:
3 KL
a ri
4 r max
KL
KL
r max r X
use 9 battens @ a = 30
2 a
KL
KL
=
+ 0.82
(1 + 2 ) rib
r m
r o
rib = 0.711
(6.9.4.3.1-1)
h = 9 (2)(0.634) = 7.73
h
7.732"
=
= 5.44
2rib (2)(0.711")
KL
=
r m
(5.44) 2 30" 2
= 71.70
( 61.07 ) + 0.82
2
0.711"
1
(5.44)
+
(
)
Now we can see that after the Y axis slenderness ratio is modified, Y axis buckling
actually governs over X axis buckling.
ODOT-LRFD Short Course - Steel
AASHTO Compression Member Example #4
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 2 of 3
-- 117 --
KL Fy 71.70 36
0.6466
=
=
=
ksi
r y E 29, 000
Since 2.25, Inelastic Buckling Governs
(6.9.4.1-1)
Pn = (0.90)(246.1kip)
Pn = 221kip
Batten Design:
Assume that there are inflection points half way between the battens and design for a shear equal
to 2% of the compressive design strength (AISC Section E6. Pg 16.1-39)
Vu = (0.02)(221kip) = 4.42kip
2.21 kip
4.42kip
kip
= 2.21 channel
2
M Mu,Batten = 33.15k-in
2Mu,Batten
I Batten
t (6")3
=
= 18t
12
S Batten =
2.21 kip
18t
= 6t
3
t 0.153
use t = 5/16
(Min Thickness)
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 3 of 3
-- 118 --
Find the design strength of a WT15x146 made of M270-50 steel. KL = 24 for buckling in all
directions. Use the provisions in the AISC Specification to determine the Flexural-Torsional
Buckling strength of the column.
Solution:
15.3"
b bf
=
=
= 4.14
t 2t f (2)(1.85")
b?
E
29, 000ksi
k
= 0.56
= 13.5 OK
t
Fy
50ksi
Web:
b h
= = 15.7 (Tabulated)
t tw
b?
E
29, 000ksi
k
= 0.75
= 18.1
t
Fy
50ksi
OK
Calculate the buckling load for Flexural Buckling about the X-Axis:
2
ksi
in
KL Fy ( 24 ') (12 ft ) 50
X =
=
ksi
r X E (4.48")() 29, 000
2
= 0.7219
(6.9.4.1-1)
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 1 of 2
-- 119 --
Calculate the Critical Stress for Flexural-Torsional Buckling about the Y-axis:
Fcrft =
Fcr ,Y + Fcr , Z
4 Fcr ,Y Fcr , Z H
1 1
2
2H
Fcr ,Y + Fcr , Z )
(
(AISC E4-2)
2
ksi
in
KL Fy ( 24 ') (12 ft ) 50
Y =
=
= 1.131
ksi
r Y E (3.58")() 29, 000
2
Fcr ,Y =
Pn
= 0.66(1.131) ( 50ksi ) = 31.15ksi
As
r o2 = xo2 + yo2 +
Ix + I y
yo = 3.62"
Ag
(6.9.4.1-1)
1.85"
= 2.695"
2
(AISC E4-7)
(861 in 4 + 549 in 4 )
r = (0.00) + ( 2.695 ) +
= 40.13 in 2
2
42.9 in
2
o
GJ
(11, 200ksi )(37.5 in 4 )
=
= 244.0ksi
2
2
2
(42.9 in )(40.13 in )
Aro
(AISC E4-3)
xo2 + yo2
(0.000") 2 + (2.695") 2
H = 1
= 1
= 0.8190
40.13 in 2
r o2
(AISC E4-8)
Fcr , Z =
Fcrft
31.15ksi + 244.0ksi
=
(2)(0.819)
( 31.15 + 244.1 )
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 2 of 2
-- 120 --
Solution:
b?
E
29, 000ksi
k
= 0.56
= 15.89 OK
36ksi
t
Fy
Flange:
3.17"
b bf
=
=
= 6.327
t t f 0.501"
Web:
b h d 2t f 12.0" (2)(0.501")
= =
=
= 21.56
0.510"
t tw
tw
b?
E
29, 000ksi
k
= 1.49
= 42.29
36ksi
t
Fy
OK
Since both the flange and the web are non-slender, local buckling is OK.
Buckling Strength:
Note that the axes of the channel are not arranged properly for the equations in the AISC
Specification. These axes need to be rearranged so that the y axis is the axis of symmetry.
Using this modified set of axes, note that KLx = 7 and KLy = KLz = 14.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 1 of 2
-- 121 --
Calculate the buckling load for Flexural Buckling about the X-Axis:
2
ksi
in
KL Fy ( 7 ' ) (12 ft ) 36
x =
=
= 1.528
ksi
r x E (0.762")() 29, 000
2
(6.9.4.1-1)
Calculate the Critical Stress for Flexural-Torsional Buckling about the Y-axis:
For Singly symmetric Sections:
Fe =
Fey =
Fey + Fez
4 Fey Fez H
1 1
2H
(Fey + Fez )2
(2 )(29, 000ksi )
(14 ')(12 )
4.29"
in
ft
(AISC E4-5)
= 186.6ksi
(AISC E4-10)
1
ksi
4
(11,
200
)(0.861
in
)
Fez =
+
2
2
in
(8.81 in )(4.54") 2 (AISC E4-11)
( (14 ')(12 ft ) )
Fez = 61.54ksi
(186.6ksi + 61.54ksi )
(4)(186.6ksi )(61.54ksi )(0.919")
Fe =
1
1
(2)(0.919")
(186.6ksi + 61.54ksi ) 2
(AISC E4-5)
Fe = 59.30ksi
Fy
Fe
36ksi
= 0.6071
59.30ksi
(6.9.4.1-1)
since 167.3kip < 246.0kip, Flexural Buckling about the x Axis Governs
Pn = (0.90)( 167.3kip) = 151kip
ODOT-LRFD Short Course - Steel
AASHTO Compression Member Example #6
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 2 of 2
-- 122 --
A pair of L4x4x1/2 angles are used as a compression member. The angles are made of
M270-36 steel and have an effective length of 12. The angles are separated by 3/8 thick
connectors.
4"
/8"
4"
Solution:
b 4.0"
=
= 8.0
1 "
t
2
Fully
Tensioned
b?
E
29, 000ksi
k
= 0.45
= 12.77
t
Fy
36ksi
Local Buckling is OK
= 119.0
r X (1.21")
ry = 1.83 from AISC 2L
Table 1-15, Pg 1-104.
in
KL (12 ') (12 ft )
=
= 78.69
r Y (1.83")
3 KL
a ri
4 r max
3
a (0.776") (119.0 ) = 69.26"
4
Use 5 connectors.. a = 36
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 1 of 3
-- 123 --
Check Flexural Buckling about the X-Axis: (Y axis is the axis of symmetry)
2
2
ksi
KL Fy 119.0 36
X =
=
ksi
r X E 29, 000
= 1.781
(6.9.4.1-1)
Fcrft
Fcr ,Y + Fcr , Z
4 Fcr ,Y Fcr , Z H
=
1 1
2
2H
( Fcr ,Y + Fcr ,Z )
(AISC E4-2)
Since the section is built-up and the connectors will be in shear for Y-axis buckling, we
must consider a modified slenderness ratio
Calculate Modified Slenderness and Y-axis Flexural Buckling Stress:
2 a
KL
KL
0.82
=
+
(1 + 2 ) rib
r m
r o
h
2rib
(6.9.4.3.1-1)
2.735"
= 1.130
(2)(1.21")
KL
=
r m
(0.82)(1.130) 2 36"
( 78.69 ) +
= 81.24
(1 + (1.130) 2 ) 1.21"
2
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 2 of 3
-- 124 --
2
ksi
KL Fy (81.24) 36
Y =
=
= 0.8301
ksi
r Y E () 29, 000
Since Y < 2.25, Inelastic Buckling Governs
Fcr ,Y =
Pn
= 0.66( 0.8301) ( 36ksi ) = 25.43ksi
As
(6.9.4.1-1)
r o2 = 5.664 in 2
(AISC E4-3)
Fcrft
25.43ksi + 170.0ksi
=
(2)(0.848)
( 25.43 + 170.0 )
Pn = (0.90)(127.9kip ) = 115kip
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 3 of 3
-- 125 --
-- 126 --
Solution
Since the section is made up of components of different materials,
the location of the PNA must be determined by equating the force
above the PNA to the force below the PNA.
(800.0
kip
PNA must lie in the web. Define q as the fraction of the web that
lies above the PNA.
Pcompression = Ptension
Pc + qPw = (1 q ) Pw + Pt
kip
kip
kip
q = 0.7694
I.e., 76.94% of the web lies above the PNA (acts in compression assuming a positive moment).
Y = 1"+ ( 0.7694 )( 22") = 17.93" from the top of steel
Find the moment arms from the resultant forces to the PNA.
tc
1"
= 17.93" = 17.43"
2
2
1
1
= ( 2 ) qh = ( 2 )( 0.7694 )( 22") = 8.463"
dc = Y
d wc
tt
2"
= 25" 17.93" = 6.074"
2
2
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 1 of 2
-- 127 --
PL16 x 1, 50ksi
50ksi
Pc
36ksi
Pwc
dc
dwc
36ksi
PNA
Pwt
dwt
dt
PL8 x 2, 70ksi
70ksi
Pt
Compute the plastic moment by summing the moments about the PNA.
M p = Pd
i i = Pc d c + Pwc d wc + Pwt d wt + Pd
t t
= ( 800kip ) (17.43") + ( 457 kip ) ( 8.463") + (137 kip ) ( 2.537") + (1,120kip ) ( 6.074")
= 24,960k-in = 2, 080k-ft
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 2 of 2
-- 128 --
Determine the plastic moment capacity for the composite beam shown below. The section is a
W30x99 and supports an 8 concrete slab. The dimensions are as shown. Use Fy = 50ksi and
fc = 4ksi. Assume full composite action.
100"
8"
Solution:
W30 x 99:
A = 29.1 in2
d = 29.7"
bf = 10.5"
tf = 0.670"
tw = 0.520"
Zx = 312 in3
Ix = 3,990 in4
Iy = 128 in4
rx = 11.7"
ry = 2.10"
Ast Fy
0.85 f c'be
ksi
ksi
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 1 of 2
-- 129 --
Pconc
ac
8"
PNA
a1
Psteel
Fy
a1 =
d st
a
29.7"
4.279"
+ ts c =
+ 8"
= 20.71"
2
2
2
2
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 2 of 2
-- 130 --
Determine the plastic moment capacity for the composite beam shown below. The section is a
W30x99 and supports a 6 thick concrete slab. The dimensions are as shown. Use Fy = 50ksi and
fc = 4ksi. Assume full composite action.
Solution:
Check Case I Pt + Pw Pc + Ps
?
NO
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 1 of 3
-- 131 --
Check Case II Pt + Pw + Pc Ps
?
50"
0.85fc
Ps
Pc1
6"
Fy
ds
PNA
Pc2
dw
Pw
dt
Pt
Fy
First, the location of the PNA within the top flange is determined.
t P + P Ps
Y = c w t
+ 1
Pc
2
kip
kip
kip
kip
351.8
2
Next, the distances from the component forces to the PNA are calculated.
6"
+ 0.2368" = 3.237"
2
29.7"
dw =
0.2368" = 14.61"
2
0.670"
dt = 29.7"
0.2368" = 29.13"
2
ds =
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 2 of 3
-- 132 --
2tc
351.8kip
2
2
=
( 0.2368") + ( 0.670" 0.2368") + ...
(2)(0.670")
2
k-in
= 262.5 kip
in 0.2437 in + 24,530
= 24,590k-in = 2, 049k-ft
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 3 of 3
-- 133 --
Determine the plastic moment capacity for the composite beam shown below for negative
flexure. The section is a W30x99 and supports an 8 concrete slab. The dimensions are as
shown. Use Fy = 50ksi and fc = 4ksi. Assume full composite action. The grade 60 reinforcement
in the slab is made up of #4 bars, with a clear cover of 17/8.
100"
8"
Solution:
Slab Reinforcement:
Top Layer:
#4 bars @ 6" cc
Bottom Layer: #4 bars @ 12" cc
2
()(0.5")
kip
Prb = Fyrb Arb = ( 60ksi ) ( 4 )
= 47.12
4
ksi
W30 x 99:
A = 29.1 in2
d = 29.7"
bf = 10.5"
tf = 0.670"
tw = 0.520"
Sx = 269 in3
Zx = 312 in3
Ix = 3,990 in4
Iy = 128 in4
rx = 11.7"
ry = 2.10"
28.36" 351.8
Y =
kip
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 1 of 3
-- 134 --
P
M p = w y 2 + ( D y ) 2 + [ Prt d rt + Prb d rb + Pd
t t + Pc d c ]
2D
751.5kip
(11.51") 2 + (28.36" 11.51") 2 + [(94.25kip )(18.06") + ...
=
(2)(28.36")
... + (47.12kip )(14.31") + (351.8kip )(11.85") + (351.8kip )(17.19")]
= 18,110k-in = 1,509k-ft
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 2 of 3
-- 135 --
The plastic moment can also be computed from first principles as well, though it is a bit more
involved. What follows is an example of how this would be completed.
Determine the Location of the PNA:
Since Pc + Pw Pt + Prb + Prt , the PNA is in the web of the section.
The location of the PNA within the web is determined by equating the tensile force acting
above the PNA with the compressive force acting below it. Assume the PNA lies at a
depth Y below the bottom of the top flange.
Pc + Pwc = Pwt + Pt + Prb + Prt
351.8kip + ( 50ksi ) ( 0.520") ( 28.36" Y ) = ( 50ksi ) ( 0.520") (Y ) + 351.8kip + 47.12kip + 94.25kip
Y = 11.46 ''
Pwt = (50ksi )(11.46") ( 0.520") = 298.0kip
Pwc = (50ksi )(28.36" 11.46") ( 0.520") = 439.4kip
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 3 of 3
-- 136 --
A non-composite W30x99 made of M270-50 steel is used to span 48. The beam is braced
laterally at 12-0 intervals and is subjected to a factored load of w = 3.75kip/ft, which includes
the self weight of the beam. Check to see if the section is adequate considering flexural failure
modes at the Strength Limit States. If appropriate, use the provisions in AASHTO Section
6.10.8 to determine capacity.
Solution:
2 Dc ?
E
5.7
tw
Fyc
(6.10.6.2.3-1)
D 28.36"
=
= 14.18"
2
2
?
(2)(14.18")
29, 000ksi
= 54.54 5.7
= 137.3
(0.520")
50ksi
Check
I yc
I yt
0.3
(6.10.6.2.3-2)
OK
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 1 of 4
-- 137 --
Since the web is non-slender and Eq 6.10.6.2.3-2 is satisfied, we have the option of using either
AASHTO Section 6.10.8 or Appendix A6 to determine the flexural capacity of this member.
For this example, the provisions of 6.10.8 will be used and we will work with stresses.
The following failure modes must be investigated:
Flange Local Buckling of the Compression Flange Fnc(FLB)
Compression Flange Lateral Buckling
Fnc(LTB)
Yielding of Tension Flange
Fnt
Fnc
pf
b fc
2t fc
10.5"
= 7.836
(2)(0.670")
(6.10.8.2.2-3)
E
29, 000ksi
= 0.38
= 0.38
= 9.152
Fyc
50ksi
(6.10.8.2.2-4)
(6.10.8.2.2-1)
rt =
b fc
1 Dc tw
12 1 +
3 b fc t fc
L p = 1.0rt
(10.5")
1 (14.18")(0.520")
12 1 +
3 (10.5")(0.670")
E
29, 000ksi
= (1.0)(2.609")
= 62.84"
Fyc
50ksi
= 2.609"
(6.10.8.2.3-9)
(6.10.8.2.3-4)
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 2 of 4
-- 138 --
(Pg 6-110)
E
29, 000ksi
= ()(2.609")
= 235.9"
Fyr
35ksi
(6.10.8.2.3-5)
Since L p = 62.84" < Lb = 144" < Lr = 235.9" , Inelastic LTB must be investigated.
F
Fnc ( LTB ) = Cb 1 1 yr
Rh Fyc
Lb Lp
Lr Lp
Rb Rh Fyc Rb Rh Fyc
(6.10.8.2.3-2)
144" 62.84"
35ksi
ksi
ksi
Fnc ( LTB ) = Cb 1 1
(1.0 )(1.0 ) ( 50 ) (1.0 )(1.0 ) ( 50 )
ksi
Compute the Moment Gradient Factor, Cb, for segment BC of the beam, which will be critical.
2
f
f
Cb = 1.75 1.05 1 + 0.3 1 2.3
f2
f2
(6.10.8.2.3-7)
C
M 2 = M c = 1, 080k-ft
f 2 = 48.18ksi
M o = M B = 810.0k-ft
f o = 36.13ksi
M BC ,mid = 1, 013k-ft
f mid = 45.19ksi
fmid
f1
42.20
42.20
Cb = 1.75 1.05
+ 0.3
= 1.061 2.3
48.18
48.18
= 1.061
Fnc ( LTB ) = (1.061) ( 42.97 ksi ) = 45.57 ksi 50ksi
= 45.57 ksi
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 3 of 4
-- 139 --
f2
The governing strength for the compression flange is the smaller of Fnc(FLB) and Fnc(LTB):
Since Fnc ( LTB ) = 45.57 ksi < Fnc ( FLB ) = 50.00ksi , LTB governs the strength of the
compression flange.
Fnc = Fnc ( LTB ) = 45.57 ksi
1
f l f Fnc
3
(6.10.8.1.1-1)
fbu = f C = 48.18ksi
Assume that Strength I Load Combination Governs, WS = 0.0 and fl = 0
Since fbu +
1
f l = 48.18ksi > f Fnc =45.57 ksi , the compression flange is not adequate.
3
(6.10.8.3-1)
Check fbu +
1
f l f Fnt
3
(6.10.8.1.2-1)
fbu = f C = 48.18ksi
Since fbu +
1
f l = 48.18ksi < f Fnt =50.00ksi , the tension flange is adequate.
3
Since the compression flange is not adequate, the section is not adequate for flexure.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 4 of 4
-- 140 --
A non-composite W30x99 made of M270-50 steel is used to span 48. The beam is braced
laterally at 12-0 intervals and is subjected to a factored load of w = 3.75kip/ft, which includes
the self weight of the beam. Check to see if the section is adequate considering flexural failure
modes at the Strength Limit States. If appropriate, use the provisions in AASHTO Appendix A6
to determine capacity.
Solution:
2 Dc ?
E
5.7
tw
Fyc
(6.10.6.2.3-1)
D 28.36"
=
= 14.18"
2
2
?
(2)(14.18")
29, 000ksi
= 54.54 5.7
= 137.3
(0.520")
50ksi
Check
I yc
I yt
0.3
(6.10.6.2.3-2)
OK
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 1 of 6
-- 141 --
Since the web is non-slender and Eq 6.10.6.2.3-2 is satisfied, we have the option of using either
AASHTO Section 6.10.8 or Appendix A6 to determine the flexural capacity of this member.
For this example, the provisions of A6 will be used and we will work with moments.
The following failure modes must be investigated:
Flange Local Buckling of the Compression Flange Mnc(FLB)
Mnc(LTB)
Lateral-Torsional Buckling
Mnt
Yielding of Tension Flange
Mnc
2 Dcp
tw
pw( Dcp )
pw( Dcp ) =
(A6.2.1-1)
E
Fyc
Dcp
rw
0.54M p
Dc
0.09
R
M
h
y
(A6.2.1-2)
rw = 5.7
E
= 137.3
Fyc
(A6.2.1-3)
pw( Dcp ) =
29, 000ksi
50ksi
14.18"
= 83.76 137.3
= 137.3
14.18"
( 0.54 ) (15, 600k-in )
0.09
(1.0 ) (13, 450k-in )
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 2 of 6
-- 142 --
2 Dcp
tw
?
(2)(14.18")
= 54.54 pw( Dcp ) = 83.76
0.520"
R pt =
Mp
M yc
Mp
M yt
15, 600k-in
= 1.160
13, 450k-in
(A6.2.1-4)
15, 600k-in
= 1.160
13, 450k-in
(A6.2.1-5)
b fc
2t fc
pf = 0.38
10.5"
= 7.836
(2)(0.670")
(A6.3.2-3)
E
29, 000ksi
= 0.38
= 9.152
50ksi
Fyc
(A6.3.2-4)
(A6.3.2-1)
b fc
1 Dc tw
12 1 +
3 b t
fc fc
L p = 1.0rt
(10.5")
1 (14.18")(0.520")
12 1 +
3 (10.5")(0.670")
E
29, 000ksi
= (1.0)(2.609")
= 62.84"
50ksi
Fyc
= 2.609"
(A6.3.3-10)
(A6.3.3-4)
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 3 of 6
-- 143 --
E
Lr = 1.95 rt
Fyr
Fyr S xc h
1 + 1 + 6.76
S xc h
E J
J
(6.10.8.2.3-5)
S
Fyr = min 0.7 Fyc , Rh Fyt xt , Fyw 0.5Fyc Fyr = (0.7) ( 50ksi ) = 35ksi
S xc
(Pg 6-222)
3
D tw3 b fc t fc
+
3
3
t fc
1 0.63
b fc
b ft t 3ft
+
3
t ft
1 0.63
b ft
(A6.3.3-9)
(10.5")(0.670")3
(28.36")(0.520")3
0.670"
4
J=
+ (2)
1 ( 0.63)
= 3.350 in
3
3
10.5"
J = 3.350 in4
E 29, 000ksi
=
= 828.6
Fyr
35ksi
3
S xc h ( 269 in ) ( 29.03")
=
= 2, 071
3.77 in 4
J
1
2, 071
1 + 1 + 6.76
= 254.9" = 21.24 '
2, 071
828.6
This value of Lr = 21.24 agrees well with the value published in AISC on Page 3-15
Since L p = 62.84" < Lb = 144" < Lr = 254.9" , Inelastic LTB must be investigated.
F S
M nc ( LTB ) = Cb 1 1 yr xc
R pc Fyc
Lb Lp
Lr Lp
R pc Fyc R pc Fyc
(A6.3.3-2)
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 4 of 6
-- 144 --
( 35ksi )( 269 in3 ) 144" 62.84" (1.160 ) 13, 450k-in (1.160 ) 13, 450k-in
M nc ( LTB ) = Cb 1 1
(
)
(
)
Compute the Moment Gradient Factor, Cb, for segment BC of the beam, which will be critical.
2
M
M
Cb = 1.75 1.05 1 + 0.3 1 2.3
M2
M2
(A6.3.3-7)
M 2 = M c = 1, 080k-ft
M o = M B = 810.0k-ft
M BC ,mid = 1, 013k-ft
Since the BMD is not concave,
M 1 = 2M mid M 2 M o = (2) (1, 013k-ft ) (1, 080k-ft ) = 946k-ft 810k-ft
2
946
946
Cb = 1.75 1.05
+ 0.3
= 1.061 2.3
1, 080
1, 080
= 1.061
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 5 of 6
-- 145 --
The governing strength for the compression flange is the smaller of Mnc(FLB) and Mnc(LTB):
Since M nc ( LTB ) = 13, 780k-in < M nc ( FLB ) = 15, 600k-in , LTB governs the strength of the
compression flange.
M nc = M nc ( LTB ) = 13, 780k-in = 1,148k-ft
1
f l S xc f M nc
3
(A6.1.1-1)
M u = M C = 1, 080k-ft
Assume that Strength I Load Combination Governs, WS = 0.0 and fl = 0
Since M u +
1
fl S xc = 1, 080k-ft < f M nc =1,148k-ft , the compression flange is adequate.
3
(A6.4-1)
1
fl S xt f M nt
3
(6.10.8.1.2-1)
M u = M C = 1, 080k-ft
Since M u +
1
f l S xt = 1, 080k-ft < f M nt =1,300k-ft , the tension flange is adequate.
3
Since both flanges are adequate, the section is adequate for flexure.
Note that the benefits of using Appendix A6 are illustrated here since the section was found
to be not adequate when the provisions in Section 6.10.8 were used to compute capacity.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 6 of 6
-- 146 --
A non-composite built-up girder made of M270-50 steel is used to span 48. The beam is braced
laterally at 12-0 intervals and is subjected to a factored load of w = 3.75kip/ft, which includes
the self weight of the beam. Check to see if the section is adequate considering flexural failure
modes at the Strength Limit States. If appropriate, use the provisions in AASHTO Section
6.10.8 to determine capacity.
PL16 x 3/4
Solution:
PL38 x 3/8
Ix = 10,730 in4
Iy = 513.2 in4
Sx = 543.1 in3
Sy = 64.15 in3
PL16 x 3/4
2 Dc ?
E
5.7
tw
Fyc
(6.10.6.2.3-1)
Take D = 38
Dc =
D 38"
=
= 19"
2
2
?
(2)(19")
29, 000ksi
= 101.3 5.7
= 137.3
( 38 ")
50ksi
Check
I yc
0.3
I yt
Since Section is doubly symmetric, Iyc = Iyt
(6.10.6.2.3-2)
OK
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 1 of 5
-- 147 --
Since the web is non-slender and Eq 6.10.6.2.3-2 is satisfied, we have the option of using either
AASHTO Section 6.10.8 or Appendix A6 to determine the flexural capacity of this member.
For this example, the provisions of 6.10.8 will be used and we will work with stresses.
The following failure modes must be investigated:
Flange Local Buckling of the Compression Flange Fnc(FLB)
Compression Flange Lateral Buckling
Fnc(LTB)
Yielding of Tension Flange
Fnt
Fnc
pf
b fc
2t fc
16"
= 10.67
(2)( 3 4 ")
(6.10.8.2.2-3)
E
29, 000ksi
= 0.38
= 0.38
= 9.152
Fyc
50ksi
(6.10.8.2.2-4)
Rh Fyc rf pf
rf = 0.56
Rb Rh Fyc
E
Fyr
(6.10.8.2.2-2)
(6.10.8.2.2-5)
(Pg 6-109)
rf = 0.56
29, 000ksi
= 16.12
35ksi
10.67 9.152
35ksi
ksi
ksi
= 1 1
(1.00)(1.00) ( 50 ) = 46.74
ksi
(1.00)(50 ) 16.12 9.152
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 2 of 5
-- 148 --
b fc
1 Dc tw
12 1 +
3b t
fc fc
L p = 1.0rt
(16")
1 (19")( 38 ")
12 1 +
3 (16")( 3 4 ")
E
29, 000ksi
= (1.0)(4.220")
= 101.6"
Fyc
50ksi
= 4.220"
(6.10.8.2.3-9)
(6.10.8.2.3-4)
E
29, 000ksi
= ()(4.220")
= 381.6"
Fyr
35ksi
(Pg 6-110)
(6.10.8.2.3-5)
Since L p = 101.6" < Lb = 144" < Lr = 381.6" , Inelastic LTB must be investigated.
F
Fnc ( LTB ) = Cb 1 1 yr
Rh Fyc
Lb Lp
Lr Lp
Rb Rh Fyc Rb Rh Fyc
(6.10.8.2.3-2)
144" 101.6"
35ksi
ksi
ksi
Fnc ( LTB ) = Cb 1 1
(1.0 )(1.0 ) ( 50 ) (1.0 )(1.0 ) ( 50 )
ksi
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 3 of 5
-- 149 --
Compute the Moment Gradient Factor, Cb, for segment BC of the beam, which will be critical.
2
f
f
Cb = 1.75 1.05 1 + 0.3 1 2.3
f2
f2
(6.10.8.2.3-7)
C
M 2 = M c = 1, 080k-ft
f 2 = 23.86ksi
M o = M B = 810.0k-ft
f o = 17.90ksi
M BC ,mid = 1, 013k-ft
f mid = 22.38ksi
f2
fmid
f1
20.90
20.90
Cb = 1.75 1.05
+ 0.3
= 1.061 2.3
23.86
23.86
Cb = 1.061
The governing strength for the compression flange is the smaller of Fnc(FLB) and Fnc(LTB):
Since Fnc ( LTB ) = 50ksi > Fnc ( FLB ) = 46.70ksi , FLB governs the strength of the compression
flange.
Fnc = Fnc ( FLB ) = 46.70ksi
1
f l f Fnc
3
(6.10.8.1.1-1)
fbu = fC = 23.86ksi
Assume that Strength I Load Combination Governs, WS = 0.0 and fl = 0
Since fbu +
1
f l = 23.86ksi < f Fnc =46.70ksi , the compression flange is adequate.
3
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 4 of 5
-- 150 --
(6.10.8.3-1)
Check fbu +
1
f l f Fnt
3
(6.10.8.1.2-1)
fbu = fC = 23.86ksi
Since fbu +
1
f l = 23.86ksi < f Fnt =50.00ksi , the tension flange is adequate.
3
Since both the compression flange and tension flange are adequate, the section is adequate
for flexure.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 5 of 5
-- 151 --
A non-composite built-up girder made of M270-50 steel is used to span 48. The beam is braced
laterally at 12-0 intervals and is subjected to a factored load of w = 3.75kip/ft, which includes
the self weight of the beam. Check to see if the section is adequate considering flexural failure
modes at the Strength Limit States. If appropriate, use the provisions in AASHTO Appendix A6
to determine capacity.
Solution:
2 Dc ?
E
5.7
tw
Fyc
(6.10.6.2.3-1)
Take D = 38
Dc =
D 38"
=
= 19"
2
2
?
(2)(19")
29, 000ksi
= 101.3 5.7
= 137.3
( 38 ")
50ksi
Check
I yc
I yt
0.3
(6.10.6.2.3-2)
OK
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 1 of 7
-- 152 --
Since the web is non-slender and Eq 6.10.6.2.3-2 is satisfied, we have the option of using either
AASHTO Section 6.10.8 or Appendix A6 to determine the flexural capacity of this member.
For this example, the provisions of A6 will be used and we will work with moments.
The following failure modes must be investigated:
Flange Local Buckling of the Compression Flange Mnc(FLB)
Lateral-Torsional Buckling
Mnc(LTB)
Yielding of Tension Flange
Mnt
Mnc
2 Dcp
tw
pw( Dcp )
pw( Dcp ) =
(A6.2.1-1)
E
Fyc
Dcp
rw
0.54M p
Dc
0.09
R
M
h
y
(A6.2.1-2)
rw = 5.7
E
= 137.3
Fyc
(A6.2.1-3)
pw( Dcp ) =
29, 000ksi
50ksi
19"
= 93.68 137.3
= 137.3
19"
( 0.54 ) ( 30, 020k-in )
0.09
(1.0 ) ( 27,160k-in )
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 2 of 7
-- 153 --
2 Dcp
tw
?
(2)(19")
= 101.3 > pw( Dcp ) = 93.68
3 "
8
w pw( Dc ) M p M p
M yc M yc
rw
pw
D
(
)
(A6.2.2-4)
Where,
D
pw( Dc ) = pw( Dcp ) cp rw
Dc
19 ''
= 93.68
137.3
19 ''
= 93.68 137.3
(A6.2.2-6)
w pw( Dc ) M p M p
rw pw( Dc ) M yt M yt
(A6.2.2-5)
b fc
2t fc
pf = 0.38
16"
= 10.67
(2)( 3 4 ")
(A6.3.2-3)
E
29, 000ksi
= 0.38
= 9.152
Fyc
50ksi
(A6.3.2-4)
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 3 of 7
-- 154 --
S
Fyr = min 0.7 Fyc , Rh Fyt xt , Fyw 0.5 Fyc ; Fyr = (0.7) ( 50ksi ) = 35ksi (Pg 6-222)
S xc
Ekc
rf = 0.95
(A.6.3.2-5)
Fyr
kc =
4
=
D
tw
4
38''
= 0.3974
(A6.3.2-6)
3 ''
8
ksi
rf
ksi
ksi
k-in
M nc ( FLB )
k-in
= 27,550k-in = 2, 296k-ft
Investigate Compression Flange Lateral-Torsional Buckling:
The unbraced length of the beam is Lb = 12-0 = 144.0.
rt =
b fc
1 Dc tw
12 1 +
3b t
fc fc
L p = 1.0rt
(16")
1 (19")( 38 ")
12 1 +
3 (16")( 3 4 ")
= 4.220"
E
29, 000ksi
= (1.0)(4.220")
= 101.6"
Fyc
50ksi
E
Lr = 1.95 rt
Fyr
Fyr S xc h
1 + 1 + 6.76
S xc h
E J
J
(A6.3.3-10)
(A6.3.3-4)
(6.10.8.2.3-5)
S
Fyr = min 0.7 Fyc , Rh Fyt xt , Fyw 0.5 Fyc Fyr = ( 0.7 ) ( 50ksi ) = 35ksi (Pg 6-222)
S xc
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 4 of 7
-- 155 --
3
t fc
D tw3 b fc t fc
+
1 0.63
3
3
b fc
b ft t 3ft
+
3
t ft
1 0.63
b ft
(A6.3.3-9)
(16")( 3 4 ")3
(38")( 3 8 ")3
3 "
+ (2)
J=
1 ( 0.63) 4 = 5.035 in 4
3
3
16"
E 29, 000ksi
=
= 828.6
Fyr
35ksi
3
S xc h ( 543.1 in ) ( 38.75")
=
= 4,180
J
5.035 in 4
1
4,180
1 + 1 + 6.76
= 396.8" = 33.06 '
4,180
828.6
Since L p = 101.6" < Lb = 144" < Lr = 396.8" , Inelastic LTB must be investigated.
F S
M nc ( LTB ) = Cb 1 1 yr xc
R pc M yc
M nc ( LTB )
Lb Lp
Lr Lp
R pc M yc R pc M yc
(A6.3.3-2)
35ksi )( 543.1 in 3 ) 144" 101.6"
(
k-in
k-in
= Cb 1 1
(1.087 ) ( 27,160 ) (1.087 ) ( 27,160 )
k-in
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 5 of 7
-- 156 --
Compute the Moment Gradient Factor, Cb, for segment BC of the beam, which will be critical.
2
M
M
Cb = 1.75 1.05 1 + 0.3 1 2.3
M2
M2
(A6.3.3-7)
M 2 = M c = 1, 080k-ft
M o = M B = 810.0k-ft
M BC ,mid = 1, 013k-ft
Since the BMD is not concave,
M 1 = 2M mid M 2 M o = (2) (1, 013k-ft ) (1, 080k-ft ) = 946k-ft 810k-ft
2
946
946
Cb = 1.75 1.05
+ 0.3
= 1.061 2.3
1, 080
1, 080
= 1.061
1
f l S xc f M nc
3
(A6.1.1-1)
M u = M C = 1, 080k-ft
Assume that Strength I Load Combination Governs, WS = 0.0 and fl = 0
Since M u +
1
fl S xc = 1, 080k-ft < f M nc =2,296k-ft , the compression flange is adequate.
3
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 6 of 7
-- 157 --
(A6.4-1)
1
fl S xt f M nt
3
(6.10.8.1.2-1)
M u = M C = 1, 080k-ft
Since M u +
1
f l S xt = 1, 080k-ft < f M nt =2,460k-ft , the tension flange is adequate.
3
Since both flanges are adequate, the section is adequate for flexure.
Note that the benefits of using Appendix A6 are illustrated here. Even though the capacity
was found to be adequate in both Examples #6a and #6b, using Appendix A6, the capacity
was found to be 16% greater than the capacity found using the provisions in Section 6.10.8.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 7 of 7
-- 158 --
12'
30kip
12'
12'
Solution:
Draw the shear force diagram.
60kip
SFD(kip)
-15kip
-45kip
kip
(6.10.9.2-1)
V p = 0.58Fy Dtw
(6.10.9.2-2)
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 1 of 2
-- 159 --
ksi
D 25.41"
=
= 51.86
tw 0.490"
1.12
Ek
= (1.12 )( 53.85 ) = 60.31
Fy
Since
D
Ek
= 51.86 < 1.12
= 60.31 , shear yielding governs and,
tw
Fy
C = 1.00
(6.10.9.3.2-4)
O.K.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 2 of 2
-- 160 --
A built-up section made of M270-50 steel, is used as a beam. Determine the design shear
capacity of the beam and determine if the beam can sustain a factored shear force of 242kip.
Solution:
(6.10.9.2-1)
V p = 0.58Fy Dtw
(6.10.9.2-2)
ksi
1.12
Ek
= (1.12 )( 53.85 ) = 60.31
Fy
1.40
Ek
= (1.40 )( 53.85 ) = 75.39
Fy
Since
D
Ek
= 101.3 > 1.40
= 75.39 , Elastic shear buckling governs and,
tw
Fy
D 38"
=
= 101.3
tw 38 "
= 0.4437
C=
=
2
2
( 50ksi )
( D / tw ) Fy (101.3)
1.57
(6.10.9.3.2-6)
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 1 of 3
-- 161 --
Try adding transverse stiffeners to the web to increase the shear strength. A panel aspect ratio of
1.25 to 1.50 looks good
do
1.25
D
d o 48"
=
= 1.263
D 38"
Ek
=
Fy
Since
5
5
= 5+
= 8.134
2
(d o / D)
(1.263) 2
(6.10.9.3.2-7)
ksi
1.12
Ek
= ( 68.68 )(1.12 ) = 76.92
Fy
1.40
Ek
= ( 68.68 )(1.40 ) = 96.15
Fy
D
Ek
= 101.3 > 1.40
= 96.15 , Elastic shear buckling governs and,
tw
Fy
Ek (1.57 ) ( 29, 000ksi ) ( 8.134 )
= 0.7218
C=
=
2
2
( 50ksi )
( D / tw ) Fy (101.3)
1.57
(6.10.9.3.2-6)
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 2 of 3
-- 162 --
The previous calculations were based on the buckling strength of the web. For interior panels
where:
2 Dtw
2.5
( b fct fc + b ft t ft )
(6.10.9.3.2-1)
(2)(38")( 38 ")
28.5
=
= 1.188 2.5
[(16")( 3 4 ") + (16")( 3 4 ")] 24.0
OK
0.87(1 C )
Vn = V p C +
2
do
1+
(6.10.9.3.2-2)
(0.87)(1 0.7218)
= 360.4kip
Vn = (413.3 ) (0.7218) +
2
1 + (1.263)
kip
Vn = (1.00)(360.4kip) = 360.4kip
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 3 of 3
-- 163 --
-- 164 --
12'
30kip
12'
12'
Solution:
Draw the shear force diagram.
60kip
SFD(kip)
-15kip
-45kip
Rn = (2.5k + N ) Fywtw
(D6.5.2-3)
O.K.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 1 of 3
-- 165 --
N
:
d
3.25"
= 0.1208 0.20
26.9"
Therefore, (D6.5.3-3) controls: Rn = 0.40t
2
w
1.5
tw EFywt f
N
1 + 3
tw
d t f
1.5
ksi
ksi
0.490"
26.9" 0.745"
O.K.
Check the Interior Concentrated Loads for Web Yielding and Web Crippling:
(Assume that the bearing length, N, is 3.25)
Check Web Yielding
Since the applied load is located at a distance greater than d from the end of the member.
Rn = (5k + N ) Fywtw
(D6.5.2-2)
O.K.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 2 of 3
-- 166 --
1.5
tw EFywt f
N
1 + 3
tw
d t f
1.5
ksi
ksi
0.490"
26.9" 0.745"
O.K.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 3 of 3
-- 167 --
A built-up section made of M270-50 steel, is used as a beam. It was determined in AASHTO
Shear Strength Example #2 that intermediate stiffeners were required to develop adequate shear
strength in the web. Determine the required size of these intermediate stiffeners. And check the
web to see if an end reaction of 128kip can be supported.
Solution:
(6.10.11.1.3-1)
and
1.5
D 4 t1.3 Fyw
It
40 E
(6.10.11.1.3-2)
where:
It - Moment of inertia of the stiffener pair about the mid-thickness of the web.
2
D
2.5
2.0 0.5
J = 2.5
2.0 0.5 use J =
2
( do / D )
do / D
(6.10.11.1.3-3)
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 1 of 6
-- 168 --
J=
2.5
( 48"/ 38")
b = smaller of do and D,
take J = 0.50
b = 38
Fcrs =
bt
tp
Fys
Fcrs =
(0.31)(29, 000ksi )
6"
3 "
8
D 4 t1.3 Fyw
40 E
It =
= 35.11ksi 50ksi
1.5
ksi
40
29, 000
(ts )(2bs + tw )3
12
= 5.909 in 4
take bs = 6
(t ) [ (2)(6") + 38 "]
= (ts )157.9 in 3
It = s
12
3
tp
btw3 J
1.002 in 4
=
= 0.006345"
157.9 in 3 157.9 in 3
say ts = 3 8 "
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 2 of 6
-- 169 --
(D6.5.2-3)
O.K.
Check
2
w
1.5
tw EFywt f
4
N
1 +
0.2
tw
d
t f
1.5
3 8 " (29, 000ksi )(50ksi )( 3 4 ")
(4)(9")
Rn = (0.40)( 8 ") 1 +
0.2
( 3 8 ")
3 4 "
(38"+ (2)( 3 4 ")
3
No Good.
The web strength is satisfactory with regard to web yielding but not for web crippling.
Bearing stiffeners will need to be added. (Technically speaking, stiffeners are required by
AASHTO at all bearing locations on built-up sections anyways)
ODOT-LRFD Short Course - Steel
AASHTO Web Strength Example #2
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 3 of 6
-- 170 --
Design the bearing stiffeners that need to be added to increase the web crippling strength:
Check local buckling of the bearing stiffener:
bt 0.48t p
bt 0.48t p
tp
E
Fy
take Fy = 50ksi
29, 000ksi
= 11.56t p
50ksi
bt
7"
=
= 0.6055"
11.56 11.56
(6.10.11.2.2-1)
take bs = 7
take ts = 5 8 "
4
= 154.7 in
I
154.7 in 4
=
= 3.704"
A
11.28 in 2
KL (0.75)(38")
=
= 7.695
r 3.704"
2
2
ksi
KL Fy 7.695 36
=
=
= 0.007448
ksi
r E 29, 000
Pn = 0.66 Fy As
(6.9.4.1-1)
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 4 of 6
-- 171 --
Check bearing stress between the end of the bearing stiffeners and the loaded flange:
Rn = 1.4 Apn Fys
(6.10.11.2.3-1)
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 5 of 6
-- 172 --
Just for fun , lets check the capacity of 2 pairs of 7 x 5/8 interior bearing stiffeners:
The local buckling check will be the same as for the single pair of bearing stiffeners.
Check the bearing stiffeners as an effective column section:
3
3
I = ( 112 ) (2) ( 5 8 ")( 7"+ 3 8 "+ 7") + ( (2)(3.375") + 7" (2) ( 5 8 ") ) ( 3 8 ") = 309.5 in 4
I
309.5 in 4
=
= 3.696"
A
22.66 in 2
2
2
ksi
KL Fy 7.711 36
=
=
ksi
r E 29, 000
KL (0.75)(38")
=
= 7.711
r 3.696"
= 0.007479
(6.9.4.1-1)
The bearing stress between the end of the bearing stiffeners and the loaded flange would be twice
that calculated for a single pair of stiffeners: Rn = (2)(378.0kip) = 756.0kip.
The strength is governed again by the equivalent column capacity, Rn = 732kip.
ODOT-LRFD Short Course - Steel
AASHTO Web Strength Example #2
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 6 of 6
-- 173 --
-- 174 --
Rn = 0.38 Ab Fub N s
6"
3"
1.5"
(6.13.2.7-2)
3"
3"
Ab = ( 7 8 ") = 0.6013 in 2
4
3"
)(
kip
Rn = (0.38) 0.6013 in 2 120ksi (1) = 27.42 bolt
C12 x 30
kip
kip
Rn = (0.80) 27.42 bolt
= 21.94 bolt
kip
bolt
) = 175.5
Pu
kip
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 1 of 4
-- 175 --
kip
Rn = (2.4) ( 7 8 ") (0.510") 58ksi = 62.11 bolt
Rn = 2.4dtFu
(6.13.2.9-1)
kip
Rn = (2.4) ( 7 8 ")( 5 8 ") 58ksi = 76.13 bolt
Rn = 2.4dtFu
(6.13.2.9-1)
kip
Rn = (1.2) (1.031") (0.510") 58ksi = 36.60 bolt
Rn = 1.2 Lc tFu
(6.13.2.9-2)
End Bolts Bearing on the Gusset Plate: (Assume that the end distance on the gusset is 11/2)
Lc = 1.5" ( 1 2 )( 7 8 "+ 116 ") = 1.031"
kip
Rn = (1.2) (1.031")( 5 8 ") 58ksi = 44.85 bolt
Rn = 1.2 Lc tFu
(6.13.2.9-2)
kip
kip
kip
Rn = (2 bolts) 44.85 bolt
+ (4 bolts) 62.11 bolt
+ (2 bolts) 36.60 bolt
= 411.3kip
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 2 of 4
-- 176 --
Since the channel web is thinner than the gusset plate and theyre made of the same material,
block shear of the channel will govern over block shear of the gusset plate.
Check Block Shear in the Channel Web:
Atg = (6")(0.510") = 3.060 in 2
NO!
)(
(6.13.4-2)
) (
)(
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 3 of 4
-- 177 --
(6.13.2.8-1)
kip
Rn = (1.00)(0.33)(1) 39kip = 12.87 bolt
kip
Rn = (8 bolts) 12.87 bolt
= 103.0kip
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 4 of 4
-- 178 --
An 8 long WT 10.5 x 66 is attached to the bottom flange of a beam as is shown below. This
hanger must support a factored load of 120kip. Given that 4, 1 diameter M164 (A325) bolts are
used to attach the hanger to the beam, investigate the adequacy of the bolts and tee flange.
Solution:
b=
(6.13.2.10.4-1)
gt
7"
k1 = 1 1 8 " = 2.375"
2
2
Pu = 0.2736 Pu
20
(8)(2.700")
(6.13.2.10.2-1)
Ab = (1") = 0.7854 in 2
4
Fub = 120ksi
kip
Tn = (0.76) ( 0.7854 in 2 )(120ksi ) = 71.63 bolt
kip
Tn = (4 bolts) 57.30 bolt
= 229.2kip
kip
kip
Tn = (0.80) 71.63 bolt
= 57.30 bolt
OK
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 1 of 2
-- 179 --
M 2M
Pb
= u
2
(120kip ) (2.375")
Mu =
k-in
= 71.25
For Safety, M p M u .
Tu
Mu
Mu
Pu/2
b
Pu
Lt 2
(8")(1.04")
ksi
k-in
Fy =
( 50 ) = 108.2
4
4
k-in
M p = (1.00) (108.2 ) = 108.2k-in
OK
Mp =
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 2 of 2
-- 180 --
Assuming an unfactored fatigue load of 60kip, determine the fatigue life of the tension bolts in the
previous example.
Solution:
For Safety, ( f ) ( F )n
(6.6.1.2.2-1)
kip
( P ) (0.75) (1.274 ) ( 60 )
( f ) =
=
= 18.24ksi
Abolts
(4) ( 0.7854 in 2 )
A 3 ( F )TH
=
2
N
1
( F )n
( F )n =
( F )TH
2
31.0ksi
=
= 15.5ksi
2
Since ( f ) = 18.24ksi > ( F )n = 15.5ksi , the bolts will have a finite life
1
( ( f ) )
A 3
=
N
(18.24 )
ksi 3
= 281,800 cycles
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 1 of 1
-- 181 --
Suppose that the hanger depicted in Examples #2 and #3 is subjected to a force that is applied at
an angle as is shown below. Determine if the connection is adequate in this configuration.
Solution:
Vu =
2 Pu
= 0.8944 Pu = 107.3kip
5
Vu =
107.3kip
kip
= 26.83 bolt
4 bolts
Tu =
1.274 Pu
= 0.5694 Pu = 68.33kip
5
Tu =
68.33kip
kip
= 17.08 bolt
4 bolts
Assume that the threads are included in the shear plane of the connection.
Vn = Rn = 0.38 Ab Fub N s
(6.13.2.7-2)
)(
kip
Vn = (0.38) 0.7854 in 2 120ksi (1) = 35.81 bolt
kip
Vu 26.83 bolt
=
= 0.7491 ,
kip
Vn 35.81 bolt
Tn = (0.76) ( 0.7854 in
Tn = 0.76 Ab Fub
)(120 )
ksi
V
1 u
Vn
(6.13.2.11-2)
kip
kip
Tn = (0.80) 25.11 bolt
= 20.09 bolt
kip
kip
> Tu = 17.08 bolt
, the bolts are OK for the loading shown.
Since Tn = 20.09 bolt
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 1 of 3
-- 182 --
(6.13.2.9-1)
kip
Rn = (2.4) (1") (1.04") 65ksi = 162.2 bolt
End Bolts:
Lc = 2" ( 1 2 )(1"+ 116 ") = 1.469"
(6.13.2.9-2)
kip
Rn = (1.2) (1.469") (1.04") 65ksi = 119.1 bolt
kip
kip
Rn = (2 bolts) 162.2 bolt
+ (2 bolts) 119.1 bolt
= 562.8kip
Since Rn = 450kip > Vu = 107 kip , the flange of the WT will be OK in bearing.
Note that since the flange thickness of the W24x176 is greater than that of the
WT10.5x66 and they are made of the same material, bearing of the WT will govern
over bearing of the W24x176.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 2 of 3
-- 183 --
(6.13.5.3-2)
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 3 of 3
-- 184 --
An L6 x 4 x 1/2, M270-36, is welded to a 3/8 thick gusset plate made of M270-50 steel. The
long leg of the angle is attached using two, 8 long fillet welds. The capacity of the angle was
previously computed as Pn = 163kip based on Gross Yielding. Determine the weld size required
to develop the full capacity of the member.
Solution:
163kip
= 0.4288"
kip
380.1 inch
Say
16
"
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 1 of 2
-- 185 --
(Taking U = 1.00)
)(
(6.13.4-2)
) (
NO!
)( 2.250 in ) = 338.7
2
kip
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 2 of 2
-- 186 --
Use the elastic vector method to compute the maximum force on any bolt in the
eccentrically loaded bolt group shown in the figure below. The bolts are all the
same size. (Example 4.12.1 from Salmon & Johnson)
Problem:
4"
3"
3"
3"
Solution:
Tr
J
J = Ad 2 = A d 2
J = ( 4 ) (2")2 + (3") 2
J = 47.12 in 4
Tr (120
Corner Bolts: =
=
J
= 9.182ksi
k-in
)(
(2") 2 + (3") 2
47.12 in
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 1 of 2
-- 187 --
kip
24kip
+
= 8.000kip
6
Vx = 6.000kip
Vtotal = Vx 2 + Vy 2 = (8.000kip ) 2 + (6.000kip ) 2 = 10.00kip
xCG:
Py:
-24
yCG:
ex:
ey:
d:
60.00
T=
-120.0
Vmax =
10.0
Bolt
A
B
C
D
E
F
x
-2.00
2.00
-2.00
2.00
-2.00
2.00
y
3.00
3.00
0.00
0.00
-3.00
-3.00
13.00
13.00
4.00
4.00
13.00
13.00
Vx
-6.0
-6.0
0.0
0.0
6.0
6.0
Vy
Vtotal
4.0
-4.0
4.0
-4.0
4.0
-4.0
6.0
10.0
0.0
8.0
6.0
10.0
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 2 of 2
-- 188 --
Use the simplified equations to solve the previous example problem. (Example
4.12.1 from Salmon & Johnson)
Problem:
4"
3"
Solution:
d
d
= 60.00 in 2
Looking at Bolt B:
VB , x
VB , y
k-in
( 120 ) ( 2")
= 4.000 kip
=
60.00 in 2
VB ,total =
( 6.000 )
kip 2
24 kip
+ ( 4.000 kip ) +
6
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 1 of 1
-- 189 --
Solution:
810k-ft + 1,300k-ft
= 1, 055k-ft
2
A) Flange Splice:
In this case, it makes no difference which flange is the controlling flange and which one is the
non-controlling flange, (Since the beam is non-composite and we are assuming that moment
could be either positive or negative).
For the Controlling flange:
1 f cf
Fcf =
+ f Fyf
2 Rh
(810 ) (12 )(
=
k-ft
f cf
0.75 f Fyf
in
ft
29.7"
2
4
(6.13.6.1.4c-1)
0.670"
2 )
3,990 in
= 35.36ksi
2
1.00
= 42.68ksi 37.50ksi
) ( 0.75)(1.00 )(1.00 ) ( 50 )
ksi
Fcf = 42.68ksi
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 1 of 20
-- 190 --
f ncf
0.75 f Fyf
Rh
(6.13.6.1.4c-3)
f ncf = f cf = 35.36ksi
Rcf =
Fcf
f cf
Fncf = (1.207 )
42.68ksi
= 1.207
35.36ksi
35.36ksi
( 0.75 )(1.00 )(1.00 ) 50ksi
1.00
= 42.68ksi 37.50ksi
Fncf = 42.68ksi
)(
An Ag
(6.13.6.4c-2)
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 2 of 20
-- 191 --
(
(
( 0.80 ) 65ksi
Ae =
( 0.95 ) 50ksi
) 5.528 in 7.035 in
(
)
)
2
= 6.052 in 2 7.035 in 2
)(
Ae = 6.052 in 2
Proceed assuming that the flange splice will consist of plate on both the outside and inside of the
flange. Assume that the flange force will be equally distributed between in the inner and outer
plates (well check the validity of this assumption later). Also assume that the outer splice plate
will be 10.5 wide (the same width as the flange) with two rows of 1 diameter M164 (A325)
bolts.
Pu ,Ten =
258.3kip
= 129.1kip
2
Pu ,Comp =
300.3kip
= 150.2kip
2
(6.8.2.1-1)
129.1kip
0.2589"
say
16 "
(6.8.2.1-2)
129.1kip
0.3010"
say
16 "
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 3 of 20
-- 192 --
(6.13.6.1.4c-4)
150.2kip
0.3179"
say
8"
Pn = ( 0.95 ) 50ksi
tinner
(6.8.2.1-1)
) ( 2)( 4.00") ( t
Inner
) 129.1kip
129.1kip
0.3297"
say
8"
Pn = ( 0.80 ) 65ksi
(6.8.2.1-2)
) ( 2) ( 4.00") (1"+
8"
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 4 of 20
-- 193 --
tinner
129.1kip
0.4318"
say
16 "
Pn = ( 0.90 ) 50ksi
t Inner
(6.13.6.1.4c-4)
) ( 2)( 4.00") ( t
Inner
) 150.2kip
150.2kip
0.4172"
say
16 "
For a flange splice with inner and outer splice plates, the flange design force at the strength limit
state may be assumed divided equally to the inner and outer plates and their connections when
the areas of the inner and outer plates do not differ by more than 10% (Commentary, Page 6191).
AOuter = (10.5")( 3 8 ") = 3.938 in 2
AOuter AInner
AAve
( 2 ) ( 3.938 in 2 ) ( 3.500 in 2 )
( 3.938 in ) + ( 3.500 in )
2
= 11.76%
Since the difference area is greater than 10%, either (1) the assumption that the flange force is
evenly divided between the outer and inner plates must be modified, or (2) the inner plate
thickness must be increased to 1/2, which would result in a difference in area between the outer
and inner plates of less than 2%. The second option will be selected for the case of this
example.
Outer Flange Splice Plate: 101/2 x 3/8
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 5 of 20
-- 194 --
(6.13.2.7-2)
Ab = (1") = 0.7854 in 2
4
)(
kip
Rn = (0.38) 0.7854 in 2 120ksi (2) = 71.63 bolt
kip
kip
Rn = (0.80) 71.63 bolt
= 57.30 bolt
say 6 bolts
2"
6 1/2"
10 1/2"
2"
24 1/2"
2 1/2"
3 1/2"
3 1/2"
2 1/2"
2 1/2"
1
W30 x 99
3 1/2"
3 1/2"
2 1/2"
W30 x 99
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 6 of 20
-- 195 --
kip
Rn = (2.4) (1") (0.670") 65ksi = 104.5 bolt
Rn = 2.4dtFu
(6.13.2.9-1)
kip
Rn = (2.4) (1") ( 83 "+ 12 ") 65ksi = 136.5 bolt
Rn = 2.4dtFu
(6.13.2.9-1)
kip
Rn = (1.2) (1.969") (0.670") 65ksi = 102.9 bolt
Rn = 1.2 Lc tFu
(6.13.2.9-2)
kip
Rn = (1.2) (1.969") ( 83 "+ 12 ") 65ksi = 134.4 bolt
Rn = 1.2 Lc tFu
(6.13.2.9-2)
kip
kip
kip
Rn = (2 bolts) 104.5 bolt
+ (2 bolts) 104.5 bolt
+ (2 bolts) 102.9 bolt
= 623.9kip
OK
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 7 of 20
-- 196 --
0.670"
548k-ft (12 inft )( 29.7"
fs
2 2 )
where Fs =
=
= 23.92ksi
4
Rh
(1.00 ) 3,990 in
(6.13.6.1.4c-5)
(6.13.2.8-1)
kip
Rn = (1.00)(0.33)(2) 51kip = 33.66 bolt
168.3kip
= 5.00 bolts
kip
33.66 bolt
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 8 of 20
-- 197 --
2 1/2"
2"
3 1/2"
Shear
6 1/2"
Tension
2"
Shear
NO!
)(
(6.13.4-2)
) (
)( 2.680 in ) = 471.8
kip
OK
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 9 of 20
-- 198 --
B) Web Splice:
The web splice is to be designed for the following actions at the Strength Limit:
1.
2.
3.
4.
The shear force in the beam at the location of the splice is Vu = 45kip and the nominal shear
capacity of the beam is Vn = 427.7kip.
1. Determine the direct shear force acting on the web splice, Vuw:
?
Vu < 0.5vVn
?
(6.13.6.1.4b-1)
2. Determine the moment, Mvuw, that is caused by the eccentricity of the direct shear, Vuw:
Assuming the arrangement of bolts shown on Page 12, the distance from the CG of the
bolt group on one side of the splice to the CL of the splice is,
e = ( 12 ) ( 3 1 2 ") + 2 1 2 "+ ( 12 ) ( 1 2 ") = 4.50"
= 303.8k-in = 25.31k-ft
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 10 of 20
-- 199 --
3. Determine the portion of the beam moment that is carried by the web splice, Muw:
M uw =
M uw
tw D 2
Rh Fcf Rcf f ncf
12
(C6.13.6.1.4b-1)
Fcf = 42.68ksi
Rcf = 1.207
(from Before)
f ncf = 35.36ksi
( 0.520")( 28.36")2
=
(1.00 ) 42.08ksi (1.207 ) 35.36ksi
12
4.
Determine the horizontal force that results from moving the beam moment, Huw:
H uw =
tw D
Rh Fcf + Rcf f ncf
12
(C6.13.6.1.4b-2)
( 0.520")( 28.36")
ksi
ksi
H uw =
(1.00 ) 42.68 + (1.207 ) 35.36
12
In this case, the ENA is at the mid-height of the beam. Since Huw is the horizontal force
that results from the eccentricity of the ENA relative to the mid-height of the beam, it
makes sense that Huw is zero.
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 11 of 20
-- 200 --
The total actions acting on the web splice are as shown below on the left.
To determine the forces acting on the bolts using the Elastic Vector Method, tables in the AISC
Manual of Steel Construction will be used for preliminary investigations. These tables are set up
to account for the shear force, Vuw, but not the moment, MTotal. This can be accommodated by
computing a fictitious shear force, P, that when applied over the eccentricity, e, results in the
same actions as the actually applied shear and moment.
3, 279k-in
P=
= 728.7 kip
4.50"
2 1/2"
3 1/2"
2 3/4"
P = 728.7kip
G
e = 41/2"
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 12 of 20
-- 201 --
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 13 of 20
-- 202 --
From Table 7-8 on Page 7-38 of the 13th Ed. of the AISC Manual of Steel Construction,
Cmin
Pu
728.7 kip
=
=
= 12.72
kip
rn 57.30 bolt
From the Table for e = 4.00, S = 3.00, and for 8 bolts in a row, C = 13.2
From the Table for e = 5.00, S = 3.00, and for 8 bolts in a row, C = 12.2
The average of these two values is 12.7. Although this is slightly smaller than 12.72, the
proposed configuration will probably still work since our horizontal spacing is 31/2 instead
of 3.
) (
) (
) (
2
2
2
2
2
d 2 = ( 4 ) ( 4 ) ( d x ) + d y , D + d y ,C + d y , B + d y , A
2
2
2
2
2
d 2 = ( 4 ) ( 4 )(1.75") + (1.5") + ( 4.5") + ( 7.5") + (10.5") = 805 in 2
VT , X
3, 279k-in (10.5")
T y
=
=
= 42.77 kip
2
2
805 in
d
VT ,Y
3, 279k-in (1.75")
T x
=
=
= 7.128kip
2
2
d
805 in
( 67.5 ) = 4.219
=
kip
VD ,Y
VTotal =
16 bolts
( 42.77 ) + ( 7.128
kip 2
kip
kip
bolt
+ 4.219kip
= 44.25kip
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 14 of 20
-- 203 --
The calculations shown on the previous page have been validated using the
spreadsheet shown here.
M:
Px:
2975
0
xCG:
Py:
67.5
yCG:
ex:
4.5
ey:
d:
805.00
T=
3278.75
Vmax =
44.2459
Bolt
A1
B1
C1
D1
E1
F1
G1
H1
A2
B2
C2
D2
E2
F2
G2
H2
x
-1.75
-1.75
-1.75
-1.75
-1.75
-1.75
-1.75
-1.75
1.75
1.75
1.75
1.75
1.75
1.75
1.75
1.75
y
10.50
7.50
4.50
1.50
-1.50
-4.50
-7.50
-10.50
10.50
7.50
4.50
1.50
-1.50
-4.50
-7.50
-10.50
113.31
59.31
23.31
5.31
5.31
23.31
59.31
113.31
113.31
59.31
23.31
5.31
5.31
23.31
59.31
113.31
Vx
Vy
Vtotal
42.7663
30.5474
18.3284
6.1095
-6.1095
-18.3284
-30.5474
-42.7663
42.7663
30.5474
18.3284
6.1095
-6.1095
-18.3284
-30.5474
-42.7663
-7.1277
-7.1277
-7.1277
-7.1277
-7.1277
-7.1277
-7.1277
-7.1277
7.1277
7.1277
7.1277
7.1277
7.1277
7.1277
7.1277
7.1277
42.8651
30.6856
18.5578
6.7667
6.7667
18.5578
30.6856
42.8651
44.2459
32.5866
21.5563
12.8867
12.8867
21.5563
32.5866
44.2459
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 15 of 20
-- 204 --
M y
12
= 3
I
d p 2t p
( )( )
M d
p
3M
= 2 Fy
d pt p
( 3) 3, 262k-in
3M
tp 2
=
= 0.2787"
d p Fy ( 26.5")2 (1.00 ) 50ksi
( )( 2t p )( Fy )
Vuw Vn = ( )( 0.58 ) d p
OK
)( 2t p ) ( Fu )
OK
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 16 of 20
-- 205 --
Rn = 1.2 Lc tFu
kip
Rn = (1.2) (1.969") (0.520") 65ksi = 79.85 bolt
(6.13.2.9-2)
Rn = 1.2 Lc tFu
kip
Rn = (1.2) (1.969")( 2 )( 516 ") 65ksi = 95.99 bolt
(6.13.2.9-2)
kip
kip
Rn = ( 0.80 ) 79.85 bolt
= 63.88 bolt
OK
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 17 of 20
-- 206 --
1. The direct shear force acting on the web splice is given as, Vsw = 30.4kip:
2. Determine the moment, Mvsw, that is caused by the eccentricity of the direct shear, Vsw:
Assuming the arrangement of bolts shown on Page 12, the distance from the CG of the
bolt group on one side of the splice to the CL of the splice is,
e = ( 12 ) ( 3 1 2 ") + 2 1 2 "+ ( 12 ) ( 1 2 ") = 4.50"
= 136.8k-in = 11.40k-ft
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 18 of 20
-- 207 --
3. Determine the portion of the beam moment that is carried by the web splice, Msw:
M sw =
M sw
tw D 2
f s f os
12
(C6.13.6.1.4b-1 mod)
( 0.520")( 28.36")2
=
23.92ksi 23.92ksi
12
) (
4. Determine the horizontal force that results from moving the beam moment, Hsw:
H sw =
tw D
f s + f os
12
(C6.13.6.1.4b-2 mod)
( 0.520")( 28.36")
ksi
ksi
H sw =
23.92 + 23.92
12
) (
The fictitious shear force, P, that when applied over the eccentricity, e, results in the same
actions as the actually applied shear and moment is determined as,
P=
1,804k-in
= 400.8kip
4.50"
The largest bolt force in the web splice due to the Service II combination can be determined as,
PBolt
PTotal 400.8kip
kip
=
=
= 24.34 bolt
16.47
C
kip
that was computed on Page 8.
This force is well below the slip capacity of 33.66 bolt
OK
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 19 of 20
-- 208 --
2"
6 1/2"
2"
3 1/2"
3 1/2"
2 1/2"
2 1/2"
3 1/2"
3 1/2"
2 1/2"
2"
2"
2 1/2"
2"
2"
W30 x 99
2 3/4"
7 Spaces @ 3"
2 3/4"
2 1/2"
3 1/2"
2 1/2"
2 1/2"
3 1/2"
2 1/2"
AASHTO-LRFD 2007
Created July 2007: Page 20 of 20
-- 209 --