Introducing Competency-Based Employee Performance Management for Public Health Nurses: A Toolkit and Piloting Strategy

CHNC Pre-Conference Workshop, May 16, 2011

Caroline Ball BEd, MHK City of Hamilton, Public Health Services Maureen Cava RN, BScN, MN, FCCHSE Toronto Public Health Heather Lokko BScN, RN, MPH Middlesex-London Health Unit

PRE-CONFERENCE WORKSHOP
Introducing Competency-Based Employee Performance Management for Public Health Nurses: A Toolkit and Piloting Strategy Monday, May 16th, 2011 (1:00-5:00 p.m.), Community Health Nurses Conference, Halifax, Nova Scotia

TOPIC
Introduction Background and History Overview of Toolkit Middlesex-London Health Adaption Hamilton Public Health Adaption Video Demonstration of Toolkit in Practice Phase A Performance Objectives BREAK (2:50-3:10) Demonstration of Toolkit in Practice Continuation of Phase A Learning Objectives

FACILITATOR
Maureen Cava Maureen Cava Maureen Cava Heather Lokko Caroline Ball via video Maureen Cava Heather Lokko

TIME
1:00-1:10 p.m. 1:10-1:25 1:25-1:40 1:40-1:55 1:55-2:10 2:10-2:25 2:25-2:50

Heather Lokko

3:10-3:30

Phase B process)

(mid cycle of

Heather Lokko

3:30-3:40

Phase C (end of process) Strategies for Introducing the Toolkit into Practice Lessons Learned

Heather Lokko

3:40-4:05

Heather Lokko Maureen Cava

4:05-4:40

Conclusion, Wrap-up and Evaluation

Maureen Cava

4:40-5:00

Background
September 2007 Core Competencies for Public Health in Canada Release 1.0 launched October 2008 HealthForceOntario funds OPHA partnership to develop a framework and tools, bringing together CCs and performance management Partners include: OPHA, City of Hamilton, Toronto Public Health, Haliburton Kawartha Pine Ridge District Health Unit, Thunder Bay District Health Unit

Project Purpose
To develop a competency-based performance management (human resources) framework and tools that will support public health units across Ontario.

What is Competency-Based Performance Management?

HR strategy intended to support work performance, learning & development activities of employees Based on 12-month cycle of planning, monitoring and evaluating employee performance and competency development A competency-based approach focuses on competencies (knowledge, skills & abilities) described in behavioural terms required for successful job performance

CBPM and Organizational Performance

Improves organizational performance by: Linking job requirements to organizational goals Providing a consistent process to assess performance of all PH employees in organization Empowering employees to build their competencies Supporting HR management practices to recruit the right people and identify learning gaps in the organization Can be used with discipline-specific, organizational or program standards.

Step 1: Become knowledgeable about competencybased performance management.

Step 2: Review the competencies and translate into a performance management context and language.
8 Ontario Public Health Performance Management Competencies
Discussion of leadership domain, which included ethics and professionalism. Determined that this should stand alone as an 8th competency area related to performance management.

Step 3: Competency profiling

Describe each competency using behavioural statements and based on one of 4 cumulative proficiency levels. For each competency area, determine which proficiency levels would best describe what is required of a frontline, consultant/specialist, manager/supervisor.

Key Project Activities

Environmental scan of Ontario PHUs Develop a Competency-Based Performance Management Framework Seek consensus from cross-section of PH professional groups and organizations Develop tools that incorporate the new framework Pre-test the tools, get feedback and refine Evaluate the project Identify opportunities to leverage and advance the use of the tools

Competencies

Professional and technical knowledge Assessment and analysis Policy and program planning, implementation and evaluation Partnerships, collaboration and advocacy Diversity and inclusiveness Communication Leadership Ethics and professionalism

Project Design Phase (May-June 2010)

PHS Employee Performance Management Pilot Plan: Project Phases &Timelines

PM Tools Preparation (July-Aug 2010)

Pre-Pilot Participant Training (Sep-Oct 2010)

Stage 1: Planning for Performance (Nov-Jan 2011) - Competency profile review - Set performance objectives - Create learning objectives/ learning plan Participant Evaluation Phase Wrap-up (Oct) Participant Check-In @ 4 months (Feb 2011)

Stage 3: Evaluating Performance (Sep-Oct 2011) - Self assessment -Outcomes and results Performance rating

Stage 2: Implementation/ Monitoring (Feb-Aug 2011) - Ongoing review - Coaching and feedback

Participant Check-In @ 8 months (June 2011)

Close Project (Dec 2011)

Toolkit Overview
Section 1 Leaders Guide to Implementation

Section 2 Guidebook for Managers & Employees Section 3 Competency Based Performance Management Tools & Resources

Performance Management Cycle

Final Survey January 2012
1. Performance Planning What must be achieved? To what standard? What competencies are needed? What development is needed and how? Training: Jan 10 or 17 Timing: Jan 10-Feb 15

Evaluation Survey Dec

Evaluation Evaluation Survey Survey Feb15-28 Feb15-28

3. Performance Evaluation How did I do? How can I do better? What have I learned? Where do I need to further develop? Timing: Sept 1 Dec 15

2. Ongoing Review & Feedback How am I doing? Can I do better? Has anything changed?
Timing: formal review at mid-cycle; ongoing feedback throughout the cycle

Timing: May 1- Aug 31

Support Meeting With Managers

Evaluation Evaluation Survey Survey Aug Aug 15-31 15-31

Support Meeting With Managers

Performance Management E Learning Website

www.corecompetencies.ca/performance_elearning

Middlesex-London Health Unit

Integrating the Public Health Nursing Discipline Specific Competencies and the OPHA Competency Based Performance Management Toolkit for Public Health
Heather Lokko, RN, BScN, CCHN(C), MPH Program Manager, Child Health Team

Background
Previous work at MLHU tool based on CCHN Standards of Practice developed and piloted MPH practicum placement to complete revisions based on recommendations from pilot & from Directors, and implement new tool Funding from MLHU and the Public Health Agency of Canada

Supporting Documents
Competency Based Performance Management Toolkit for Public Health (OPHA, 2009) Public Health Nursing Discipline Specific Competencies (CHNC, 2009) Adapting the performance appraisal system for public health nurses to reflect expertise in applying the Canadian Community Health Nursing Standards and the Public Health Core Competencies (Sealy et al, 2009)

Consultation with Stakeholders

Internal
Program Managers & Directors Human Resources Manager Performance Evaluation Staff Advisory Group (PHN representation across health unit) Community Health Nursing Specialist Nursing Practice Council

External
Caroline Ball (Hamilton Public Health Services) Two provincial nursing leaders/consultants

Tool Development

Performance Management tool

Adapted from the Toolkit Revised to reflect Public Health Nursing Discipline-Specific Competencies Incorporated input & recommendations from pilot project and stakeholders

Public Health Nurse job description

Competencies

Public health nursing competencies are the observable and integrated knowledge, skills, judgment and attributes required of a public health nurse to practice safely, ethically, and effectively with minimal supervision. Attributes include, but are not limited to, attitudes, values, and beliefs.
(Adapted from the definitions available in the Public Health Nursing Discipline Specific Competencies (http://www.chnc.ca/nursing-publications.cfm), College of Nurses of Ontario (http://www.cno.org/docs/qa/44028_CRT.pdf) , and MLHU Performance Appraisal Pilot Project recommendations)

Self-Assessment Rating Scale

Rarely Sometimes Often Always Challenging Situations; Mentoring &/or Consultation Limited or No Opportunity to Practice

Overall Rating Scale

Face Validity
Extent to which an instrument looks as if it measures what it is intended to measure (Patton, 2008) Generally judged by clinical/practitioner & theoretical experts (Green & Lewis, 1986) Increases users understanding of & confidence in the data (Patton, 2008) Weaker than criterion or construct validity Qualitative feedback is most helpful

Face Validation Results

Move indicators into more appropriate levels Change wording slightly to make concepts clearer Adapt indicators slightly so they more adequately reflect PHN practice Modify wording somewhat to increase measurability Add indicators to address gaps

Other recommendations

Examples:
Glossary of terms Comprehensive orientation & ongoing support Clarify use with novice practitioners Optional review of additional levels Provide practice examples

Implementation
Approval from Directors Process chart to guide use Orientation for each team (done individually to better meet needs of each program area) Ongoing support to managers & staff, as requested Will be holding discussion session for managers

Competency Categories & Indicators

Explore concepts in the indicators & identify practice examples

Public Health & Nursing Sciences Assessment & Analysis Program & Policy Planning, Implementation & Evaluation Partnerships, Collaboration & Advocacy Communication Leadership Ethics, Professional Responsibility & Accountability

City of Hamilton, Public Health Services

Adapting the OPHA & Partners Employee Performance Management for Public Health Toolkit for Use by Public Health Nurses: The Hamilton (V 2.0) Experience
Caroline Ball B.Ed, MHK Project Manager, Core Competencies

Next Generation Nursing PM Toolkit Adaptation: City of Hamilton Public Health Services
Objectives:
Build on the London Tool (V 1.0) Further adapt tools for use in Hamilton (V 2.0) Engage nurses in review of V 2.0 Revise tools for real time piloting Plan and implement piloting in 2011

Toolkit Components for Review and Adaptation

Guide to CBPM for Public Health Self Assessment Tool MLHU (V 1.0) Public Health Nursing Discipline Specific Competencies MLHU (V 1.0) Public Health Nursing Discipline Specific Competency Profiles Planning and Evaluation Tool

V 2.0 Toolkit Adaptation Process Activities

Adapted V 1.0 Toolkit

Review (May 10)

Review London V 1.0 behavioural statements and forms for fit Feedback via expert panel questionnaire 2 cross-department nurse consultation sessions (45 participants) Additional stakeholder feedback Expert panel review of revised tools

Adapted V 2.0 Toolkit Review (July 10) Pre-Test and further revise V 2.0 (Sept 10) Design 2011 Pilot Plan (Nov 10)

Develop basic pilot design elements

Confirm Management Endorsement (pending)

Approval for 2011 Real Time Pilot Plan (WE ARE HERE)

Hamilton PHS Nursing Competencies Adapted Performance Management Toolkit (V 2.0) 2011/2012 Pilot Plan: Proposed Project Activities &Timelines
Participant Evaluation Phase Wrap-up @ 12 months

PM Tools Preparation (2 months)

Pre-Pilot Participant Training (1 month)

Stage 1: Planning for Performance (2 months) - Competency profile review - Set performance objectives - Create learning objectives/ learning plan Participant Check-In @ 3 months

Stage 3: Evaluating Performance (2 months) - Self assessment -Outcomes and results Performance rating

Stage 2: Implementation/ Monitoring (7 months) - Ongoing review - Coaching and feedback

Participant Check-In @ 8 months (June 2011)

Close Project (1 month)

Step 1: Tools Preparation Technical review of Nursing-specific adapted PM toolkit

Participant Evaluation Phase Wrap-up @ 12 months

PM Tools Preparation (2 months)

Pre-Pilot Participant Training (1 month)

Stage 1: Planning for Performance (2 months) - Competency profile review - Set performance objectives - Create learning objectives/ learning plan Participant Check-In @ 3 months

Revise to align with corporate requirements

Endorsement and support from corporate leadership team

Stage 3: Evaluating Performance (2 months) - Self assessment -Outcomes and results Performance rating

Stage 2: Implementation/ Monitoring (7 months) - Ongoing review - Coaching and feedback

Participant Check-In @ 8 months (June 2011)

Close Project (1 month)

Step 2: Pre-Pilot Participant Training Recruit supervisor/staff dyads

PM Tools Preparation (2 months)

Pre-Pilot Participant Training (1 month)

Complete initial introductory e-learning module (self-guided)

Complete half-day training sessions

Stage 1: Planning for Performance (2 months) - Competency profile review - Set performance objectives - Create learning objectives/ learning plan Participant Evaluation Phase Wrap-up @ 12 months Participant Check-In @ 3 months

Stage 3: Evaluating Performance (2 months) - Self assessment -Outcomes and results Performance rating

Stage 2: Implementation/ Monitoring (7 months) - Ongoing review - Coaching and feedback

Participant Check-In @ 8 months (June 2011)

Individualized consultation as required

Close Project (1 month)

Pilot Implementation Process Stage 1: Planning for Performance Competency profile review

PM Tools Preparation (2 months)

Pre-Pilot Participant Training (2 months)

Setting performance objectives

Stage 1: Planning for Performance (2 months) - Competency profile review - Set performance objectives - Create learning objectives/ learning plan Participant Evaluation Phase Wrap-up @ 12 months Participant Check-In @ 3 months

Creating learning objectives and learning plan --------------------------------Participant process check-in survey @ 3 months

Stage 3: Evaluating Performance (2 months) - Self assessment -Outcomes and results Performance rating

Stage 2: Implementation/ Monitoring (7 months) - Ongoing review - Coaching and feedback

Participant Check-In @ 8 months (June 2011)

Close Project (1 month)

Pilot Implementation Process Stage 2: Implementation and Monitoring Ongoing review Coaching and feedback ----------------------------------Participant process check-in survey @ 6 months
Stage 3: Evaluating Performance (2 months) - Self assessment -Outcomes and results Performance rating Participant Evaluation Phase Wrap-up @ 12 months

PM Tools Preparation (2 months)

Pre-Pilot Participant Training (2 months)

Stage 1: Planning for Performance (2 months) - Competency profile review - Set performance objectives - Create learning objectives/ learning plan Participant Check-In @ 3 months

Stage 2: Implementation/ Monitoring (7 months) - Ongoing review - Coaching and feedback

Participant Check-In @ 8 months

Close Project (1 month)

Pilot Implementation Process Stage 3: Evaluating Performance Self Assessment Outcomes and results Performance rating ------------------------------------Final participant process evaluation survey @ 12 months
Stage 3: Evaluating Performance (2 months) - Self assessment -Outcomes and results Performance rating Participant Evaluation Phase Wrap-up @ 12 months

PM Tools Preparation (2 months)

Pre-Pilot Participant Training (2 months)

Stage 1: Planning for Performance (2 months) - Competency profile review - Set performance objectives - Create learning objectives/ learning plan Participant Check-In @ 3 months

Stage 2: Implementation/ Monitoring (7 months) - Ongoing review - Coaching and feedback

Participant Check-In @ 8 months

Close Project (1 month)

Pilot Implementation Process Final Phase: Close Project

PM Tools Preparation (2 months)

Pre-Pilot Participant Training (1 month)

Participant process evaluation review

Final Report & Recommendations Document lessons learned

Stage 1: Planning for Performance (2 months) - Competency profile review - Set performance objectives - Create learning objectives/ learning plan Participant Evaluation Phase Wrap-up @ 12 months Participant Check-In @ 3 months

Stage 3: Evaluating Performance (2 months) - Self assessment -Outcomes and results Performance rating

Stage 2: Implementation/ Monitoring (7 months) - Ongoing review - Coaching and feedback

Participant Check-In @ 8 months (June 2011)

Close Project (1 month)

Proposed Participant Strategy

24 total pilot participants from all divisions (9) manager/employee dyads; (3) Sr. manager/manager dyads Managers in dyad should be experienced in performance management process Voluntary participation, with commitment to completing full 12-month process

------------------------------------------------------------ Project Advisory Committee Chief Nursing Officer Nursing Practice Development Committee

Pilot Next Steps

Secure pilot endorsement from management Confirm participant strategy Confirm project advisory structure Implement 3-stage pilot in real time (12 mos.) Evaluate tools and process throughout the CBPM cycle (Participant Checkin) Recommendations Close project lessons learned

Strategies to Move Forward & Lessons Learned

Have a lead within the agency Build on existing capacity Identify & collaborate with internal & external partners Engage leadership, ensure their support & keep them in the loop

Directors meetings, one-on-one meetings, email updates, opportunities for input

Strategies to Move Forward & Lessons Learned

Engage nurses at every level, from a range of nursing practice areas Build understanding of competency-based performance management & available tools Adapt tools as necessary to suit your organization

Strategies to Move Forward & Lessons Learned

Provide comprehensive orientation & ongoing support Be patient invest the time that is needed

To go through the process To get buy-in and support To become familiar with the concepts and explore how they apply to practice To complete the tool

Thank You!

Caroline Ball City of Hamilton, Public Health Services Maureen Cava Toronto Public Health Heather Lokko - Middlesex-London Health Unit