Ipo Process
Ipo Process
Ipo Process
Overview and History of Initial Public Offering: An interesting Historical fact is that the first company that got listed was in the year 1602, The Dutch East India Company (Chambers, 2006). Organizations in the 21 st Century are not only getting bigger, but also extremely complex. The M&A route adopted by many organizations to become even larger by acquiring smaller organizations is also on a roll, albeit in the short term. Given the Global meltdown and its imperatives on the world economy, companies trying hard to stay afloat, approaching the small investor with a Public offerings is no more as exciting as it used to, yet Companies continue to choose the option of an Initial Public Offering (herein after referred as IPO). Being a professional in such demanding market situation, it becomes important to know certain aspects of the IPO. Requirement for an IPO: As organizations grow bigger, the requirement for funds increases. Such Orgniasations have limited options. They will either have to approach a Bank or a lender for money or go in for a Private Equity Fund (herein after referred to as PE Fund) investment. The funding from the PE Funds are expensive and stressful for a Company and proves counter productive in the long run as compared to public finance. The PE Funds also want to exercise the Exit Option at an appropriate price. In such a situation there are two options available for the Company namely: 1. IPO 2. Management Buy Out/ Leveraged Buy Out (herein after referred as MBO/LBO) Generally, the option of MBO/LBO is preferred by the management where the acquiring entity is already listed. The benefit that arises out of such a transaction is that the acquired company becomes a listed entity directly, as the acquirer is a listed entity or it becomes a subsidiary of a listed company. This option to exercise is very cheap for the company as it does not have to incur any cost except the costs incurred at time of acquisition and such capital expenditure incurred by the company becomes allowable to the company for tax purpose under section 35D of the Income Tax Act, 1961. However, the only benefit that the company loses in exercising the option of MBO/LBO is loss of its identity. So far as other Commercial, Strategic or Financial benefits are concerned, they are for the management to decide. There is no debate here regarding which option is better to be exercise. The IPO Process 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. IPO process Indian Regulatory and the Frame work QIPs Analysis and Restatement of Financial Statement of 5 years prior to listing Management Discussion & Analysis Auditors Role and Comfort letter issued & Compilation 1 Utsav Hirani| Chartered Accountant Mobile : +91-99300 97909 Mumbai
b. Financial Statements and Disclosures: Firstly, the financial statements for the previous 5 financial years will have to be restated as per the requirement of Security and Exchange Board of India (herein after referred as SEBI) 2 Utsav Hirani| Chartered Accountant Mobile : +91-99300 97909 Mumbai
5. Promoters and Other Conditions: 1. The promoters contribution for the IPO of an unlisted public company shall on be more then extent of 20% of the post issued capital 2. Shares that are issued 1 year prior to IPO to the promoter at a price equivalent which is lower than what is offered to public shall be considered in above 20% of the holdings. 3. The promoter contribution of 20% shall be locked in for the period of 3 years from the date of allotment of shares in IPO or the commencement of commercial production of the company, whichever is later. 4. Any holdings by the promoter in excess of 20% shall be locked for the period of 1 year.
3. Qualified Institutional Placements (herein after referred as QIPs): In order to make Indian markets more competitive and efficient, it has been decided to introduce an additional mode for listed companies to raise funds from domestic market in the form of Qualified Institutions Placement (QIP). Key features: a. Any domestic company whose shares are listed is eligible. b. Issues only QIBs as per the guidelines. c. No restrictions as to lock in period d. The restriction only to the extent of the amount which is raised through this channel. e. No requirement of pre issue filing of the Offer document with SEBI. f. Pricing bases are similar to that of ADRs/GDRs. g. No specification for the period/years of which the financial statements are to be filed.
Critical issues to be dealt with: Restated financial statements with period not less than 12 for 5 preceding years. Changes in the Statutory Auditor within 5 preceding previous year. Whether to present Consolidated Financial Statements or Standalone Financial Statement of the Company. Whether to present the financial statements of the oversees subsidiary, if any, in accordance to Indian GAAP or in accordance with the local GAAP. Whether to present financial statements as per U.S.GAAP/IFRS in addition to Indian GAAP. Timelines for presentation and audit at discretion between the company, merchant bankers and the auditors However, it should be noted that no projected financial information should be included in the offer document in any case. Disclosure of the significant account policies. Accounting ratios based on the restated Financial Statements such as Earning per Share, Return on Equity, Return on Capital Employed etc. Basis of issue price should be justified. Statement of tax shelter. Rate of dividend to equity share holders. Tax benefit availed and available to the company. Turnover shall be segmented in accordance with each and every sale line item. Unsecured loans from group companies, JVs and associates shall be disclosed in the Offer Document. Details of the other Income exceeding 20% of the PAT, its sources and its nature. Details of discontinued business or business line and its impact over the Profit/Loss of the Company. Where the proceeds of the issue are to be used for acquisition of any other business where the interest is more than 50%, then Profit/Loss of such company for 5 preceding years and
Auditors Responsibility after an IPO: 1. 2. 3. 4. Drafting report for prospectus and filing registration statement. Review the MD & A. Issue Comfort Letters. Co-ordinate with Merchant Bankers, Lead Book Runners, Lawyers and the Management.
5. Issue of the Comfort and Consent Letters: 1. Clause 5.3.3 of the SEBI Guidelines requires that the lead merchant bankers furnish a due diligence certificate as specified in Schedule III along with the draft prospectus. 2. The underwriters and certain other parties involved with the registration of securities may be held liable for false or misleading statements or omissions made in a registration statement. Generally, the underwriters would have little or no liability for statements made on the authority of an expert (e.g., independent auditors) 3. The due diligence certificate (Schedule III to the Guidelines) inter-alia include that the LMBs give comfort that the the disclosures made in the draft prospectus / letter of offer are true, fair and adequate to enable the investors to make a well informed decision as to the ssinvestment in the proposed issue" 4. The due diligence review is generally is performed by the underwriters or their legal counsel and includes an examination of all material information contained in the registration statement or offering document. 5. However, because underwriters and certain other parties are not familiar with the company's accounting systems or personnel, they cannot personally conduct a "reasonable investigation" of financial and accounting data not covered by the auditors' report. 6. Instead, a usual condition of an underwriting agreement is that the independent auditors perform certain procedures and, based on those procedures, issue a letter to the underwriters (commonly referred to as the "comfort letter").