Mergers and Acquisitions (

A
PROJECT ASSIGNMENT ON MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS
ST XAVIERS COLLEGE BY HABIB SARKAR B.COM (MORNING) 3RD YEAR ROLL NO. 565 UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF PROF. A. P. MONDAL
MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS
CONTENTS:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVE OF STUDY METHODOLOGY LIMITATION OF STUDY MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS ACROSS INDIAN SECTORS MERGERS AND ACQUISITION IN INDIA: LATEST TRENDS CHAPTER 2 MERGERS AND AMALGATION ACQUISITIONS AND TAKEOVER DISTINCTION BETWEEN MERGER AND ACQUISITION BENEFITS OF MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS REASONS FOR MERGER AND ACQUISITIONS REASONS FOR FAILURE OF MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS CHAPTER 3 MERGERS: KEY CORPORATE LAWS CONSIDERATION AND SECURITIES
CHAPTER 4 ACQUISITION: KEY CORPORATE AND SECURITIES LAWS CONSIDERATION CHAPTER 5 COMPETITION LAW CHAPTER 6
Habib Sarkar Roll No. 565
CASE STUDY: RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD. (RIL) AND RELIANCE PETROLEUM LTD. (RPL) MERGER CONCLUSION BIBLIOGRAPHY
CHAPTER 1
Introduction:
The process of mergers and acquisitions has gained substantial importance in today's corporate world. This process is extensively used for restructuring the business organizations. In India, the concept of mergers and acquisitions was initiated by the government bodies. Some well known financial organizations also took the necessary initiatives to restructure the corporate sector of India by adopting the mergers and acquisitions policies. The Indian economic reform since 1991 has opened up a whole lot of challenges both in the domestic and international spheres. The increased competition in the global market has prompted the Indian companies to go for mergers and acquisitions as an important strategic choice. The trends of mergers and acquisitions in India have changed over the years. The immediate effects of the mergers and acquisitions have also been diverse across the various sectors of the Indian economy.
Objective of Study:
This project study aims to provide a basis for the conceptual framework of Mergers and Acquisition. An attempt is made to highlight the following aspects: Concept of Mergers and Acquisitions. Latest trends of Mergers and Acquisitions in India. Different types of Mergers and Acquisitions. Distinction between Mergers and Acquisitions. Benefits of Mergers and Acquisitions. Reasons for Mergers and Acquisitions. Reasons for failure of Mergers and Acquisitions. Key Corporate and Securities Law consideration of Mergers and Acquisitions. Competition Law.
Research Methodology and Limitation of Study:

Research methodology is a way to systematically solve research problem. In it we study the various steps that are generally adopted by researcher in studying his research problem along with the logic behind them. It is necessary for a researcher to know not only the research methods/techniques but also the methodology. It may be noted, in the context of planning & development, that the significance of research lies in its quality and not in quantity. Researchers should know how to apply particular research techniques, but they also need to know which of these methods or techniques, are relevant and which are not, and what would they mean and indicate and why. This project is the mixture of theoretical as well as practical knowledge. Also it contains ideas and information imparted by the guide. The secondary data required for the project was collected from various websites and books of reputed authors. The project started with sorting all the raw data and arranging them in perfect order. The data was collected from various sites, books, journals, etc. A detail study of the Companies Act and SEBI guidelines was done to understand the legal aspect of mergers and acquisition. However, I have faced various problems and challenges while collecting the aforesaid information. The said problems have been listed below as its limitation: 1 Time constraint - Due to time constraint, a deep research could not be conducted which would have given more accurate result. However, nevertheless the results and finding of the said study has given a brief understanding and status of Mergers and Acquisition in India. 2 No access to relevant information Another important limitation to be noted is that some relevant information which would have been very important for the accurate result was not accessible by the general public. The said information was accessible only to certain authorized person.
Mergers and Acquisitions Across Indian Sectors:

Among the different Indian sectors that have resorted to mergers and acquisitions in recent times, telecom, finance, FMCG, construction materials, automobile industry and steel industry are worth mentioning. With the increasing number of Indian companies opting for mergers and acquisitions, India is now one of the leading nations in the world in terms of mergers and acquisitions. India welcomed 2010 with great aplomb as it announced five big Mergers & Acquisition (M&A) deals in the first quarter. These five major deals accounted for over 71 per cent of the total M&A deals, and are worth around $19 billion. In fact the biggest of them all, the Airtel-Zain mega deal worth

$10.7 billion has surpassed the total M&A figures for 2009. It is also the first time that an Indian telecom firm has acquired a global telecom major.
Mergers and Acquisitions in India: the Latest Trends:

Till recent past, the incidence of Indian entrepreneurs acquiring foreign enterprises was not so common. The situation has undergone a sea change in the last couple of years. Acquisition of foreign companies by the Indian businesses has been the latest trend in the Indian corporate sector. There are different factors that played their parts in facilitating the mergers and acquisitions in India. Favorable government policies, buoyancy in economy, additional liquidity in the corporate sector, and dynamic attitudes of the Indian entrepreneurs are the key factors behind the changing trends of mergers and acquisitions in India. The Indian IT and ITES sectors have already proved their potential in the global market. The other Indian sectors are also following the same trend. The increased participation of the Indian companies in the global corporate sector has further facilitated the merger and acquisition activities in India.
CHAPTER 2
Mergers and Amalgamations:
The term merger is not defined under the Companies Act, 1956 (the Companies Act), the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the ITA) or any other Indian law. Simply put, a merger is a combination of two or more distinct entities into one; the desired effect being not just the accumulation of assets and liabilities of the distinct entities, but to achieve several other benefits such as, economies of scale, acquisition of cutting edge technologies, obtaining access into sectors / markets with established players etc. Generally, in a merger, the merging entities would cease to be in existence and would merge into a single surviving entity. Very often, the two expressions "merger" and "amalgamation" are used synonymously. But there is, in fact, a difference. Merger generally refers to a circumstance in which the assets and liabilities of a company (merging company) are vested in another company (the merged company). The merging entity loses its identity and its shareholders become shareholders of the merged company. On the other hand, an amalgamation is an arrangement, whereby the assets and liabilities of two or more companies (amalgamating companies) become vested in another company (the amalgamated company). The amalgamating companies all lose their identity and emerge as the amalgamated company; though in certain transaction structures the amalgamated company may or may not

be one of the original companies. The shareholders of the amalgamating companies become shareholders of the amalgamated company. While the Companies Act does not define a merger or amalgamation, Sections 390 to 394 of the Companies Act deal with the analogous concept of schemes of arrangement or compromise between a company, it shareholders and/or its creditors. A merger of a company A with another company B would involve two schemes of arrangements, one between A and its shareholders and the other between B and its shareholders. The ITA defines the analogous term amalgamation as the merger of one or more companies with another company, or the merger of two or more companies to form one company. The ITA goes on to specify certain other conditions that must be satisfied for the merger to be an amalgamation. Mergers may be of several types, depending on the requirements of the merging entities: Horizontal Mergers: Also referred to as a horizontal integration, this kind of merger takes place between entities engaged in competing businesses which are at the same stage of the industrial process. A horizontal merger takes a company a step closer towards monopoly by eliminating a competitor and establishing a stronger presence in the market. The other benefits of this form of merger are the advantages of economies of scale and economies of scope. Vertical Mergers: Vertical mergers refer to the combination of two entities at different stages of the industrial or production process. For example, the merger of a company engaged in the construction business with a company engaged in production of brick or steel would lead to vertical integration. Companies stand to gain on account of lower transaction costs and synchronization of demand and supply. Moreover, vertical integration helps a company move towards greater independence and self-sufficiency. The downside of a vertical merger involves large investments in technology in order to compete effectively. Congeneric Mergers: These are mergers between entities engaged in the same general industry and somewhat interrelated, but having no common customer-supplier relationship. A company uses this type of merger in order to use the resulting ability to use the same sales and distribution channels to reach the customers of both businesses. Conglomerate Mergers: A conglomerate merger is a merger between two entities in unrelated industries. The principal reason for a conglomerate merger is utilization of financial resources, enlargement of debt capacity, and increase in the value of outstanding shares by increased leverage and earnings per share, and by lowering the average cost of capital. A merger with a diverse business also helps the company to foray into varied businesses without having to incur large start-up costs normally associated with a new business. Cash Merger: In a typical merger, the merged entity combines the assets of the two companies and grants the shareholders of each original company shares in the new company based on the relative valuations of the two original companies. However, in the case of a cash merger, also known as a cash-out merger, the shareholders of one entity receives cash in place of

shares in the merged entity. This is a common practice in cases where the shareholders of one of the merging entities do not want to be a part of the merged entity. Triangular Merger: A triangular merger is often resorted to for regulatory and tax reasons. As the name suggests, it is a tripartite arrangement in which the target merges with a subsidiary of the acquirer. Based on which entity is the survivor after such merger, a triangular merger may be forward (when the target merges into the subsidiary and the subsidiary survives), or reverse (when the subsidiary merges into the target and the target survives).
Acquisition and Takeover:

An acquisition or takeover is the purchase by one company of controlling interest in the share capital, or all or substantially all of the assets and/or liabilities, of another company. A takeover may be friendly or hostile, depending on the offeror companys approach, and may be effected through agreements between the offeror and the majority shareholders, purchase of shares from the open market, or by making an offer for acquisition of the offerees shares to the entire body of shareholders. Friendly takeover: Also commonly referred to as negotiated takeover, a friendly takeover involves an acquisition of the target company through negotiations between the existing promoters and prospective investors. This kind of takeover is resorted to further some common objectives of both the parties. Hostile Takeover: A hostile takeover can happen by way of any of the following actions: if the board rejects the offer, but the bidder continues to pursue it or the bidder makes the offer without informing the board beforehand. Leveraged Buyouts: These are a form of takeovers where the acquisition is funded by borrowed money. Often the assets of the target company are used as collateral for the loan. This is a common structure when acquirers wish to make large acquisitions without having to commit too much capital, and hope to make the acquired business service the debt so raised. Bailout Takeovers: Another form of takeover is a bail out takeover in which a profit making company acquires a sick company. This kind of takeover is usually pursuant to a scheme of reconstruction/rehabilitation with the approval of lender banks/financial institutions. One of the primary motives for a profit making company to acquire a sick/loss making company would be to set off of the losses of the sick company against the profits of the acquirer, thereby reducing the tax payable by the acquirer. This would be true in the case of a merger between such companies as well. Acquisitions may be by way of acquisition of shares of the target, or acquisition of assets and liabilities of the target. In the latter case it is usual for the business of the target to be acquired by the acquirer on a going concern basis, i.e. without attributing specific values to each asset / liability, but by arriving at a valuation for the business as a whole (in the context of

the ITA, such an acquisition is referred to as a slump sale). An acquirer may also acquire a target by other contractual means without the acquisition of shares, such as agreements providing the acquirer with voting rights or board rights. It is also possible for an acquirer to acquire a greater degree of control in the target than what would be associated with the acquirers stake in the target, e.g., the acquirer may hold 26% of the shares of the target but may enjoy disproportionate voting rights, management rights or veto rights in the target.
Distinction between Mergers and Acquisitions:
The terms merger and acquisition mean slightly different things. When one company takes over another and clearly established itself as the new owner, the purchase is called an acquisition. From a legal point of view, the target company ceases to exist, the buyer "swallows" the business and the buyer's stock continues to be traded. In the pure sense of the term, a merger happens when two firms, often of about the same size, agree to go forward as a single new company rather than remain separately owned and operated. This kind of action is more precisely referred to as a "merger of equals." Both companies' stocks are surrendered and new company stock is issued in its place. In practice actual mergers of equals don't happen very often. Usually, one company will buy another and, as part of the deal's terms, simply allow the acquired firm to proclaim that the action is a merger of equals, even if it's technically an acquisition. Being bought out often carries negative connotations, therefore, by describing the deal as a merger, deal makers and top managers try to make the takeover more palatable. A purchase deal will also be called a merger when both CEOs agree that joining together is in the best interest of both of their companies. But when the deal is unfriendly (i.e. when the target company does not want to be purchased) it is always regarded as an acquisition. Whether a purchase is considered a merger or an acquisition really depends on whether the purchase is friendly or hostile and how it is announced. In other words, the real difference lies in how the purchase is communicated to and received by the target company's board of directors, employees and shareholders.
Benefits of Mergers and Acquisitions:
Benefits of Mergers and Acquisitions are the main reasons for which the companies enter into these deals. Mergers and Acquisitions may generate tax gains, can increase revenue and can reduce the cost of

capital. The main benefits of Mergers and Acquisitions are the following: Greater Value Generation: Mergers and acquisitions often lead to an increased value generation for the company. It is expected that the shareholder value of a firm after mergers or acquisitions would be greater than the sum of the shareholder values of the parent companies. Mergers and acquisitions generally succeed in generating cost efficiency through the implementation of economies of scale. Merger & Acquisition also leads to tax gains and can even lead to a revenue enhancement through market share gain. Companies go for Mergers and Acquisition from the idea that, the joint company will be able to generate more value than the separate firms. When a company buys out another, it expects that the newly generated shareholder value will be higher than the value of the sum of the shares of the two separate companies. Mergers and Acquisitions can prove to be really beneficial to the companies when they are weathering through the tough times. If the company which is suffering from various problems in the market and is not able to overcome the difficulties, it can go for an acquisition deal. If a company, which has a strong market presence, buys out the weak firm, then a more competitive and cost efficient company can be generated. Here, the target company benefits as it gets out of the difficult situation and after being acquired by the large firm, the joint company accumulates larger market share. This is because of these benefits that the small and less powerful firms agree to be acquired by the large firms. Gaining Cost Efficiency: When two companies come together by merger or acquisition, the joint company benefits in terms of cost efficiency. A merger or acquisition is able to create economies of scale which in turn generates cost efficiency. As the two firms form a new and bigger company, the production is done on a much larger scale and when the output production increases, there are strong chances that the cost of production per unit of output gets reduced. An increase in cost efficiency is affected through the procedure of mergers and acquisitions. This is because mergers and acquisitions lead to economies of scale. This in turn promotes cost efficiency. As the parent firms amalgamate to form a bigger new firm the scale of operations of the new firm increases. As output production rises there are chances that the cost per unit of production will come down. Mergers and Acquisitions are also beneficial: When a firm wants to enter a new market. When a firm wants to introduce new products through research and development. When a forms wants achieve administrative benefits. To increased market share.

To lower cost of operation and/or production. To gain higher competitiveness. For industry know how and positioning. For financial leveraging. To improve profitability and EPS. An increase in market share is one of the plausible benefits of mergers and acquisitions. In case a financially strong company acquires a relatively distressed one, the resultant organization can experience a substantial increase in market share. The new firm is usually more cost-efficient and competitive as compared to its financially weak parent organization.
Reasons for mergers and acquisitions:

One of the most common arguments for mergers and acquisitions is the belief that "synergies" exist, allowing the two companies to work more efficiently together than either would separately. Such synergies may result from the firms' combined ability to exploit economies of scale, eliminate duplicated functions, share managerial expertise, and raise larger amounts of capital. 'Horizontal' mergers (between companies operating at the same level of production in the same industry) may also be motivated by a desire for greater market power. Businesses are always looking for ways to reduce their tax exposure. A firm has large sums of money lying idle, using these sums to acquire another business that would not only enhance its operations but would also reduce its tax liability. Corporations may pursue mergers and acquisitions as part of a deliberate strategy of diversification, allowing the company to exploit new markets and spread its risks.
A company may seek an acquisition because it believes its target to be undervalued, and thus a "bargain" - a good investment capable of generating a high return for the parent company's shareholders. Often, such acquisitions are also motivated by the "empire-building desire" of the parent company's managers. A firm may be targeted for acquisition because it has specific skills within its staff or has a particular technology that would be useful to another business.
Reasons for Failure of Mergers and Acquisitions:

Sometimes, the failure of an acquisition to generate good returns for the parent company may be explained by the simple fact that they
10

paid too much for it. Having bid over-enthusiastically, the buyer may find that the premium they paid for the acquired company's shares (the so-called "winner's curse") wipes out any gains made from the acquisition. However, even a deal that is financially sound may ultimately prove to be a disaster, if it is implemented in a way that does not deal sensitively with the companies' people and their different corporate cultures. There may be acute contrasts between the attitudes and values of the two companies, especially if the new partnership crosses national boundaries (in which case there may also be language barriers to contend with). A merger or acquisition is an extremely stressful process for those involved: job losses, restructuring, and the imposition of a new corporate culture and identity can create uncertainty, anxiety and resentment among a company's employees. Research shows that a firm's productivity can drop by between 25 and 50 percent while undergoing such a large-scale change; demoralisation of the workforce is a major reason for. Companies often pay undue attention to the short-term legal and financial considerations involved in a merger or acquisition, and neglect the implications for corporate identity and communication, factors that may prove equally important in the long run because of their impact on workers' morale and productivity. Managers, suddenly deprived of authority and promotion opportunities, can be particularly bitter: one survey found that "nearly 50% of executives in acquired firms seek other jobs within one year". Sometimes there may be specific personality clashes between executives in the two companies. This may prove a serious problem.
CHAPTER 3
Mergers and Amalgamations: Key Corporate and Securities Laws Considerations.
A. COMPANIES ACT, 1956: Sections 390 to 394 (the Merger Provisions) of the Companies Act govern a merger of two or more companies under Indian
11

law. The Merger Provisions are in fact worded so widely, that they would provide for and regulate all kinds of corporate restructuring that a company may possibly undertake; such as mergers, amalgamations, demergers, spin-off /hive off, and every other compromise, settlement, agreement or arrangement between a company and its members and/or its creditors. Procedure under the Merger Provisions: Since a merger essentially involves an arrangement between the merging companies and their respective shareholders, each of the companies proposing to merge with the other(s) must make an application to the Company Court 5 (the Court) having jurisdiction over such company for calling meetings of its respective shareholders and/or creditors. The Court may then order a meeting of the creditors/shareholders of the company. If the majority in number representing 3/4th in value of the creditors/shareholders present and voting at such meeting agree to the merger, then the merger, if sanctioned by the Court, is binding on all creditors/shareholders of the company. The Court will not approve a merger or any other corporate restructuring, unless it is satisfied that all material facts have been disclosed by the company. The order of the Court approving a merger does not take effect until a certified copy of the same is filed by the company with the Registrar of Companies. The Merger Provisions constitute a comprehensive code in them, and under these provisions Courts have full power to sanction any alterations in the corporate structure of a company that may be necessary to effect the corporate restructuring that is proposed. For example, in ordinary circumstances a company must seek the approval of the Court for effecting a reduction of its share capital. However, if a reduction of share capital forms part of the corporate restructuring proposed by the company under the Merger Provisions, then the Court has the power to approve and sanction such reduction in share capital and separate proceedings for reduction of share capital would not be necessary. Applicability of Merger Provisions to foreign companies: Section 394 vests the Court with certain powers to facilitate the reconstruction or amalgamation of companies, i.e. in cases where an application is made for sanctioning an arrangement that is: for the reconstruction of any company or companies or the amalgamation of any two or more companies; and Under the scheme the whole or part of the undertaking, property or liabilities of any company concerned in the scheme (referred to as the transferor company) is to be transferred to another company (referred to as the transferee company). Section 394 (4) (b) makes it clear that: a transferor company would mean any body corporate 6, whether or not a company registered under the Companies Act (i.e. an Indian company), implying that a foreign company could also be a transferor, and a transferee company would only mean an Indian company. Therefore, the Merger Provisions recognize and permit a merger/reconstruction where a foreign company merges into an
12

Indian company. But the reverse is not permitted, and an Indian company cannot merge into a foreign company. B. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA: 1. Takeover Code. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (the SEBI) is the nodal authority regulating entities that are listed on stock exchanges in India. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 (the Takeover Code) restricts and regulates the acquisition of shares / control in listed companies. Generally, if an acquirer acquires 15% or more of the shares or voting rights of a listed company, the acquirer would be required to make an offer to the public to acquire at least 20% of the voting capital of the company. However, Regulation 3 (1) (j) of the Takeover Code provides that Regulations 10, 11 and 12 would not apply to any transfer or acquisition of shares or voting rights pursuant to a scheme of arrangement or reconstruction, including amalgamation or merger or demerger, under any law or regulation, whether Indian or foreign. Therefore if a merger is sanctioned by the Court under the Merger Provisions, the above mentioned provisions of the Takeover Code would not be applicable. Disclosure requirements under the Takeover Code: It must be noted that Regulations 7 and 8 of the Takeover Code would continue to be applicable to a merger involving a listed company. Disclosures on certain acquisitions: Regulation 7 requires an acquirer to make disclosures of the aggregate of his shareholding if the acquirer acquires more than 5%, 10%, 14%, 54% or 74% of the shares/voting rights of a company. Such disclosures must be made at each stage of acquisition and are to be made to the company and to the stock exchanges on which the shares of the company are listed. Regulation 7 further provides that an acquirer, who has acquired shares/voting rights under Regulation 11 (Consolidation of holdings), must disclose purchase or sale of 2% or more of the share capital of the company, to the company and to the stock exchanges on which the shares of the company are listed. The disclosures mentioned above are to be made within 2 days of (i) the receipt of intimation of allotment of shares or (ii) the acquisition of shares or voting rights, as the case may be. The company whose shares are acquired must also disclose to the stock exchanges, the total number of shares held by the acquirers mentioned above. Continual disclosures: Regulation 8 requires a person holding more than 15% of the shares / voting rights of a company to make annual disclosures to the company (within 21 days from the financial year ending March 31) in respect of his holdings as on March 31. 2. Listing Agreement:
13

The listing agreement11 entered into by a company for the purpose of listing its shares with a stock exchange requires the following in the case of a Court approved merger12: The scheme of merger/amalgamation/reconstruction must be filed with the stock exchange at least one month prior to filing with the Court. The scheme cannot violate or override the provisions of any securities law/stock exchange requirements. The pre and post merger shareholding must be disclosed to the shareholders.
CHAPTER 4
Acquisitions: Key Corporate and Securities Laws Considerations:
A. COMPANIES ACT, 1956: The Companies Act does not make a reference to the term acquisition per se. However, the various modes used for making an acquisition of a company involve compliance with certain key provisions of the Companies Act. The modes most commonly adopted are a share acquisition or an asset purchase. 1. Acquisition of Shares. A share purchase may take place by an acquisition of all existing shares of the target by the acquirer, or by way of subscription to new shares in the target so as to acquire a controlling stake in the target. Transferability of shares: Broadly speaking, an Indian company may be set up as a private company or a public company. Membership of a private company is restricted to 50 members, and a private company is required by the Companies Act to restrict the transferability of its shares. A restriction on transferability of shares is consequently inherent to a private company, such restrictions being contained in its articles of association (the by laws of the company), and usually in the form of a pre-emptive right in favor of the other shareholders. The articles of association may prescribe certain procedures relating to transfer of shares that must be adhered to in order to affect a transfer of shares. While acquiring shares of a private company, it is therefore advisable for the acquirer to ensure that the non-selling shareholders (if any) waive any rights they may have under the articles of association, and the procedure for transfer under the articles of association is followed, lest any shareholder of the company claim that the transfer is void or claim a right to such shares. Transfer of shares: The transferor and transferee are required to execute a share transfer form, and lodge such form along with the share certificates,
14

with the company. The share transfer form is a prescribed form, which must be stamped in accordance with law. On lodging the same with the company, the company will affect the transfer in its records and endorse the share certificates in favor of the acquirer. It is also necessary for the Board of the company to pass a resolution approving the transfer of shares. Squeeze out provisions: Section 395 of the Companies Act provides that if a scheme or contract involving the transfer of shares or a class of shares in a company (the transferor company) to another company (the transferee company) is approved by the holders of at least 9/10ths in value of the shares whose transfer is involved, the transferee company may give notice to the dissenting shareholders that it desires to acquire such shares, and the transferee company is then, not only entitled, but also bound to acquire such shares. In computing 90% (in value) of the shareholders as mentioned above, shares held by the acquirer, nominees of the acquirer and subsidiaries of the acquirer must be excluded. The scheme or contract referred to above should be approved by the shareholders of the transferee company within 4 months from the date of the offer. The dissenting shareholders have the right to make an application to the Court within one month from the date of the notice, if they are aggrieved by the terms of the offer. If no application is made, or the application is dismissed within one month of issue of the notice, the transferee company is entitled and bound to acquire the shares of the dissenting shareholders. If the transferee already holds more than 10% (in value) of the shares (being of the same class as those that are being acquired) of the transferor, then the following conditions must also be met: The transferee offers the same terms to all holders of the shares of that class whose transfer is involved; and The shareholders holding 90% (in value) who have approved the scheme/contract should also be not less than 3/4ths in number of the holders of those shares (not including the acquirer). Therefore, if an acquirer already holds 50% of the shares of the target, it would need the approval of 90% (in value) of the other shareholders of the target to invoke the provisions of this Section, i.e. the approval of holders of 45% of the shares of the target. If this approval is received, the acquirer would then be entitled to acquire the balance 5% of the shares of the target. Since the acquirer in such a case holds more than 10% of the share capital, then the shareholders holding 45% of the share capital must also constitute at least 3/4ths (in number) of the shareholders holding the balance 50%. Therefore, if one shareholder holds 45% and approves the transfer, and the remaining 5% is held by 5 shareholders who do not approve the transfer, then the acquirer would not be able to invoke the provisions of Section 395. If the dissenting shareholders do not apply to the Court, or the Court does not provide any relief to the dissenting shareholders on their application, then the acquirer must send a copy of the notice (issued to the dissenting shareholders) along with an instrument of transfer, executed on behalf of the dissenting shareholder by any person appointed by the acquirer, to the
15

target along with the consideration payable. The instrument of transfer must also be executed by the transferee on its own behalf. The transferor would then be obliged to record and register the transfer in favor of the transferee. The consideration received by the transferor must be deposited in a separate bank account and held in trust for the dissenting shareholders. This procedure is subject to the conditions and terms set forth in the Companies Act. The merit of these provisions is that a complete takeover or squeeze-out could be effected without resort to tedious court procedures. Some restrictions: Section 395 provides that the transferor company (i.e. the target) can be any body corporate, whether or not incorporated under Indian law. Therefore the target can also be a foreign company. However, a transferee company (i.e. the acquirer), must be an Indian company. New share issuance: If the acquisition of a public company involves the issue of new shares or securities to the acquirer, then it would be necessary for the shareholders of the company to pass a special resolution under the provisions of Section 81(1A) of the Companies Act. A special resolution is one that is passed by at least 3/4ths of the shareholders present and voting at a meeting of the shareholders. A private company is not required to pass a special resolution for the issue of shares, and a simple resolution of the board of directors should suffice. The issue of shares by an unlisted public company to an acquirer must also comply with the Unlisted Public Companies (Preferential Allotment) Rules, 2003. Some of the important features of these rules are as follows: Equity shares, fully convertible debentures, partly convertible debentures or any other financial instruments convertible into equity are governed by these rules. The issue of shares must be authorized by the articles of association of the company and approved by a special resolution passed by shareholders in a general meeting, authorizing the board of directors of the company to issue the shares. The validity of the shareholders resolution is 12 months, implying that if shares are not issued within 12 months of the resolution, the resolution will lapse, and a fresh resolution will be required for the issuance. The explanatory statement to the notice for the general meeting should contain key disclosures pertaining to the object of the issue, pricing of shares including the relevant date for calculation of the price, shareholding pattern, change of control, if any, and whether the promoters/directors/key management persons propose to acquire shares as part of such issuance. Limits on investment: Section 372A of the Companies Act provides for certain limits on inter-corporate loans and investments. An acquirer may acquire by way of subscription, purchase or otherwise, the securities of any other body corporate up to 60% of the acquirers paid up share capital and free reserves, or 100 % of its free reserves, whichever is more. However, the acquirer is permitted to acquire shares beyond such limits, if it is
16

authorized by its shareholders vide a special resolution passed in a general meeting. It may be noted that the restrictions under Section 372A are not applicable to private companies. Further, Section 372A would not be applicable to an acquirer which is a foreign company. 2. Asset Purchase: An asset purchase involves the sale of the whole or part of the assets of the target to the acquirer. The board of directors of a public company or a private company that is a subsidiary of a public company, cannot sell, lease or dispose all, substantially all, or any undertaking of the company without the approval of the shareholders in a shareholders meeting. Therefore, it would be necessary for more than 50% of the shareholders of the seller company to pass a resolution approving such a sale or disposal. Further, a separate asset purchase agreement may sometimes be executed to better capture the provisions relating to transfer of assets. Non compete provisions may also be linked to goodwill and contained in the asset purchase agreement. B. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA: 1. Securities and Exchange Board of India (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2009 On August 26, 2009, Securities and Exchange Board of India ( SEBI) notified the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2009 ( ICDR Regulations) replacing the erstwhile Securities and Exchange Board of India (Disclosure and Investor Protection) Guidelines, 2000. As per the ICDR Regulations, if the acquisition of an Indian listed company involves the issue of new equity shares or securities convertible into equity shares (Specified Securities) by the target to the acquirer, the provisions of Chapter VII (Preferential Allotment Regulations) contained in ICDR Regulations will be applicable (in addition to the provisions of the Companies Act mentioned above). We have highlighted below some of the relevant provisions of the Preferential Allotment Regulations. Pricing of the issue. Where the equity shares of the target have been listed on a stock exchange for a period of 6 months or more prior to the relevant date, the price of the equity shares issued on a preferential basis must be not less than the price that is the higher of, (a) the average of the weekly high and low of the closing prices of the related equity shares quoted on the stock exchange during the six months preceding the relevant date, or (b) the average of the weekly high and low of the closing prices of the related equity shares quoted on a stock exchange during the two weeks preceding the relevant date. Lock-in: Specified Securities issued to the acquirer (who is not a promoter of the target) are subject to a lock-in for a period of one year from the date of allotment. Further, if the acquirer holds any equity shares of the target prior to such preferential allotment, then such prior equity shareholding of
17

the acquirer shall be locked in for a period of 6 months from the date of the preferential allotment. If the Specified Securities are allotted on a preferential basis to promoters/promoter group as defined in Chapter I of the ICDR Regulations, these shall be locked in for a period of 3 years from the date of allotment subject to a permitted limit of 20% of the total capital of the company. Such locked in Specified Securities may be transferred amongst promoter/promoter group or any person in control of the company, subject to the transferee being subject to the remaining period of the lock in. Currency of the resolution: The preferential allotment of Specified Securities pursuant to a resolution of the shareholders approving such issuance must be completed within a period of 15 days from the date on which the resolution is passed by the shareholders, failing which a fresh approval of the shareholders shall be necessary. Exemption: The Preferential Allotment Regulations (other than the lock-in provisions) do not apply in the case of a preferential allotment of shares pursuant to merger / amalgamation approved by the Court under the Merger Provisions discussed above. 2. Takeover Code. If an acquisition is contemplated by way of issue of new shares, or the acquisition of existing shares, of a listed company, to or by an acquirer, the provisions of the Takeover Code may be applicable. Under the Takeover Code, an acquirer, along with persons acting in concert: cannot acquire shares or voting rights which (taken together with shares or voting rights, if any, held by him and by persons acting in concert), entitle such acquirer to exercise 15% or more of the shares or voting rights in the target who has acquired, 15% or more but less than 55% of the shares or voting rights in the target, cannot acquire, either by himself or through persons acting in concert, additional shares or voting rights entitling him to exercise more than 5% of the voting rights the target, in any financial year ending on 31st March, who holds 55% or more but less than 75% of the shares or voting rights in the target, cannot acquire either by himself or through persons acting in concert, any additional shares or voting rights therein, Who holds 75% of the shares or voting rights in the target, cannot acquire either by himself or through persons acting in concert, any additional shares or voting rights therein, unless the acquirer makes a public announcement to acquire the shares or voting rights of the target in accordance with the provisions of the Takeover Code. The term acquisition would include both, direct acquisition in an Indian listed company as well as indirect acquisition of an Indian listed company by virtue of acquisition of companies, whether listed or unlisted, whether in India or abroad. Further, the aforesaid limit of
18

5% acquisition is calculated aggregating all purchases, without netting of sales. However, vide a recent amendment, any person holding 55% or more (but less than 75%) shares is permitted to further increase his shareholding by not more than 5% in the target without making a public announcement if the acquisition is through open market purchase in normal segment on the stock exchange but not through bulk deal /block deal/ negotiated deal/ preferential allotment or the increase in the shareholding or voting rights of the acquirer is pursuant to a buyback of shares by the target. Though there were certain ambiguities as to the period during which the 5% limit can be exhausted, SEBI has clarified that the 5% limit shall be applicable during the lifetime of the target without any limitation as to financial year or otherwise. However, just like the acquisition of 5% up to 55%, the acquisition is calculated aggregating all purchases, without netting of sales. Where an acquirer who (together with persons acting in concert with him) holds fifty five per cent (55%) or more but less than seventy five per cent (75%) of the shares or voting rights in a target company, is desirous of consolidating his holding while ensuring that the public shareholding in the target company does not fall below the minimum level permitted by the Listing Agreement, he may do so only by making a public announcement in accordance with these regulations: Provided that in a case where the target company had obtained listing of its shares by making an offer of at least ten per cent. (10%) of issue size to the public in terms of clause (b) of sub-rule (2) of rule 19 of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules, 1957, or in terms of any relaxation granted from strict enforcement of the said rule, this sub-regulation shall apply as if for the words and figures seventy five per cent (75%), the words and figures ninety per cent. (90%) were substituted. Till recently, under regulation 3(2) of the Takeover Code, acquisition of ADRs / GDRs were exempted from open offer requirement under Chapter III of the Takeover Code until the time of conversion into the underlying equity shares. It was generally understood that this position would remain unchanged even when customary voting arrangements are entered into between depositories and ADR / GDR holders. However, pursuant to the SEBI Press Release No.300/2009 dated September 22, 2009, an amendment was brought in by SEBI in the Takeover Code that such exemption from open offer would be available only as long as ADR / GDR holders remain passive investors without any kind of voting arrangement with the depository banks on the underlying equity shares. Regulation 12 of the Takeover Code further provides that irrespective of whether or not there has been any acquisition of shares or voting rights in a company, no acquirer shall acquire control 26 over the target company, unless such person makes a public announcement to acquire shares and acquires such shares in accordance with the Takeover Code. For the purpose of this Regulation, the term acquisition includes direct or indirect acquisition of control of the target company by virtue of acquisition of companies, whether listed or unlisted and whether in India or abroad. However the requirement under Regulation 12 does not apply to a change in
19

control that takes place pursuant to a special resolution passed by the shareholders in a general meeting. Therefore, if 3/4ths of shareholders present and voting at a meeting approve the change of control, then the requirement to make a public offer under Regulation 12 would not be triggered. The principle objectives of the Takeover Code are to provide the shareholders of a listed company with adequate information about an impending change in control of the company, and also to provide them with a limited exit option in case they do not wish to retain their shareholding in the company post the change in control. It is also possible for the acquirer to provide that the offer to acquire shares is subject to minimum level of acceptance, which may be less than 20%. However to do this, the acquirer would need to deposit at least 50% of the consideration payable in an escrow account. Pricing of the offer: The merchant banker appointed by the acquirer will determine the price for the offer on the basis of the parameters laid down in the Takeover Code. Regulation 20 (4) provides that the offer price for shares of a target company (whose shares are frequently traded) will be the highest of: the negotiated price under the agreement for acquisition of shares or voting rights entered into by the acquirer; price paid by the acquirer or PAC for acquisition, if any, including by way of allotment in a public or rights or preferential issue during the twenty six week period prior to the date of public announcement, whichever is higher; average of the weekly high and low of the closing prices of the shares of the target company as quoted on the stock exchange where the shares of the company are most frequently traded during the twentysix weeks, or the average of the daily high and low of the prices of the shares as quoted on the stock exchange where the shares of the company are most frequently traded during the two weeks, preceding the date of public announcement, whichever is higher. In the case of a target company whose shares are infrequently traded 27, in addition to the factors stated in (a) and (b) above (for frequently traded shares), other parameters such as return on net worth, book value of the shares of the target company, earning per share, price earning multiple vis-vis the industry average, are also considered for determining the price. The SEBI may also require valuation of such infrequently traded shares by an independent valuer. Mode of payment of offer price : The offer price may be paid in cash, by issue, exchange or transfer of shares (Other than preference shares) of the acquirer, if the acquirer is a listed entity, by issue, exchange or transfer of secured instruments of the acquirer with a minimum A grade rating from a credit rating agency registered with the SEBI, or a combination of all of the above. Non-compete payments: Payments made to persons other than the target company under any non-compete agreement exceeding 25% of the offer
20

price arrived at as per the requirements mentioned above, must be added to the offer price. Pricing for indirect acquisition or control : The offer price for indirect acquisition or control shall be determined with reference to the date of the public announcement for the parent company and the date of the public announcement for acquisition of shares of the target company, whichever is higher, in accordance with requirements set out above. If the acquirer intends to dispose of / encumber the assets in the target company, except in the ordinary course of business, then he must make such a disclosure in the public announcement or in the letter of offer to the shareholders, failing which, the acquirer cannot dispose of or encumber the assets of the target company for a period of 2 years from the date of closure of the public offer. Restrictions on the target company: After the acquirer makes the public announcement, the target company is also subject to certain restrictions. The target company cannot then (a) Sell, transfer, encumber or otherwise dispose off or enter into an agreement for sale, transfer, encumbrance or for disposal of assets, except in the ordinary course of business of the target company and its subsidiaries, (b) issue or allot any securities carrying voting rights during the offer period, except for any subsisting obligations, and (c) Enter into any material contracts. Further the board of directors of the target company cannot (a) appoint as additional director or fill in any casual vacancy on the board of directors, any person(s) representing or having interest in the acquirer, until the acquire fulfill his obligations under the Takeover Code, and (b) permit any existing director of the target company who represents or has an interest in the acquirer, to participate in any matter relating to the offer. Competitive Bidding/ Revision of offer/bid: The Takeover Code also permits a person other than the acquirer (the first bidder) to make a competitive bid, by a public announcement, for the shares of the target company. This bid must be made within 21 days from the date of the public announcement of the first bidder. The competitive bid must be for at least the number of shares held by the first bidder (along with PAC), plus the number of shares that the first bidder has bid for. If the first bidder wishes to revise his bid, then he must make another public announcement within 14 days from the date of the public announcement by the second bidder. The first bidder (and any other bidder) is in fact, entitled to revise his bid upwards (subject only to certain time limitations), irrespective of whether or not a competitive bid is made. Certain exemptions from the applicability of the Regulations 10, 11 and 12 of the Takeover Code: The following acquisitions / transfers would be exempt from the key provisions of the Takeover Code: acquisition pursuant to a public issue; acquisition by a shareholder pursuant to a rights issue to the extent of his entitlement and subject to certain other restrictions; inter-se transfer of shares amongst:
21

qualifying Indian promoters and foreign collaborators who are shareholders, qualifying promoters, provided that the parties have been holding shares in the target company for a period of at least three years prior to the proposed acquisition, the acquirer and PAC, where the transfer of shares takes place three years after the date of closure of the public offer made by them under the Takeover Code and the transfer is at a price not exceeding 125% of the price determined as per the Takeover Code (as mentioned above); acquisition of shares in the ordinary course of business by (a) Banks and public financial institutions as pledgees, (b) the International Finance Corporation, Asian Development Bank, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Commonwealth Development Corporation and such other international financial institutions; acquisition of shares by a person in exchange of shares received under a public offer made under the Takeover Code; acquisition of shares by way of transmission on succession or inheritance; transfer of shares from venture capital funds or foreign venture capital investors registered with the SEBI to promoters of a venture capital undertaking or to a venture capital undertaking, pursuant to an agreement between such venture capital fund or foreign venture capital investors, with such promoters or venture capital undertaking; change in control by takeover of management of the borrower target company by the secured creditor or by restoration of management to the said target company by the said secured creditor in terms of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002; acquisition of shares in companies whose shares are not listed on any stock exchange, unless it results in the acquisition shares/voting rights/control of a company listed in India; and acquisition of shares in terms of guidelines or regulations regarding delisting of securities framed by the SEBI. 3. Listing Agreement: Clause 40A of the listing agreement 33 entered into by a company with the stock exchange on which its shares are listed, requires the company to maintain a public shareholding34 of at least 25% or 10%, as the case may be, on a continuous basis. If the public shareholding falls below the minimum level pursuant to: the issuance or transfer of shares (i) in compliance with directions of any regulatory or statutory authority, or (ii) in compliance with the Takeover Code, or reorganization of capital by a scheme of arrangement, the stock exchange may provide additional time of 1 year (extendable up to 2
22

years) to the company to comply with the minimum requirements. In order to comply with the minimum public shareholding requirements, the company must either, issue shares to the public or offer shares of the promoters to the public. If a company fails to comply with the minimum requirements, its shares may be delisted by the stock exchange, and penal action may also be taken against the company. 4. Insider Trading Regulations: Securities and Exchange Board of India (Insider Trading) Regulations, 1992 regulates insider trading and a person in violation of these regulations is punishable under Section 24 and Section 15G of the SEBI Act, 1992. These regulations were considerably amended in 2002 and renamed as Securities and Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as the SEBI Insider Regulations). The SEBI Insider Regulations are intended to prevent insider trading in securities of Indian listed company. The SEBI Insider Regulations are basically punitive in nature with respect to describing what constitutes insider trading and then seeking to punish such an act in various ways. Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) is responsible for administering and enforcing SEBI Insider Regulations. Regulation 3 of SEBI Insider Regulations prohibits an Insider from communicating counseling or procuring directly or indirectly any unpublished price sensitive information to any person. Thus, the above provisions prohibit the insider from communicating unpublished price sensitive information and also the person receiving such unpublished price sensitive information from dealing in securities. As defined under the Regulation 2(d), the words dealing in securities shall mean the act of subscribing, buying, selling, or agreeing to subscribe, buy or sell or deal in any securities by any person, either as principal or as agent. As per Regulation 2(ha) of SEBI Insider Regulations, price sensitive information (PSI) means: "any information which relates directly or indirectly to a company and which if published are likely to materially affect the price of securities of company. Therefore, any information which can materially affect the price of securities could be treated as PSI. The following shall be deemed to be PSI : Periodical financial results of the company; Intended declaration of dividends (both interim and final); Issue of securities or buy-back of securities; Any major expansion plans or execution of new projects; Amalgamation, mergers or takeovers; Disposal of the whole or substantial part of the undertaking; and Significant changes in policies, plans or operations of the company. Information that is not publicly known or information that has not been published officially is considered as non public information. The term unpublished is defined under Regulation 2(k) of the SEBI Insider
23

Regulations as information that is not published by the company or its agents and is not specific in nature. Under the SEBI Insider Regulations an insider on his behalf or on behalf of any other person is prohibited from dealing in securities of a company listed on a stock exchange when he is in possession of any Unpublished PSI, irrespective of whether or not such a trade was made for the purpose of making a gain or reducing a loss. As such, the existence of profit motive is not required while interpreting the violation of SEBI Insider Regulations. However, in the case of Rakesh Agarwal v. SEBI, [2004] 49 SCL 351 (SATMumbai) it was held that if an insider based on the Unpublished PSI deals in securities for no advantage to him, over others, it is not against the interest of shareholders. Further it was held that it is true that the regulation does not specifically bring in mens rea as an ingredient of insider trading. But that does not mean that the motive need be ignored. Regulation 3 of the SEBI Insider Regulations prohibits dealing, communication or counseling on matters relating to insider trading. It states that No insider shall i) either on his own behalf or on behalf of any other person, deal in securities of a company listed on any stock exchange when in possession of any unpublished price sensitive information; or ii) communicate counsel or procure directly or indirectly any unpublished price sensitive information to any person who while in possession of such unpublished price sensitive information shall not deal in securities: Provided that nothing contained above shall be applicable to any communication required in the ordinary course of business or profession or employment or under any law. On the basis of this regulation it may be stated that the offence of insider trading or dealing, constitutes of a set of necessary ingredients, which are: Involvement of Insiders / Connected persons; Possession of unpublished Price Sensitive Information; and Dealing in securities listed on any stock exchange. Regulation 3A reads, No Company shall deal in the securities of another company or associate of that other company while in possession of any unpublished price sensitive information. Disclosure Requirements: The SEBI Insider Regulations requires all directors, officers and substantial shareholders in a listed company to make periodic disclosures of their shareholding as specified in the SEBI Insider Regulations. Initial Disclosures37: Any person holding more than 5% shares or voting rights in any listed company is required to disclose to the company in Form A38, the number of shares or voting rights held by such person on becoming such holder, within two (2) working days of the receipt of intimation of allotment of shares or the acquisition of shares or voting rights, as the case may be. Any person, who is a director or officer of a listed company, shall disclose to the company in Form B39, the number of shares or voting rights held by such person and their dependents within two working days of becoming a director or officer of the company.
24
Continual Disclosures: Any person holding more than 5% shares or voting rights in any listed company is required to disclose to the company within two (2) working days from receipt of intimation of allotment of shares; or acquisition or sale of shares or voting rights in Form C40, the number of shares or voting rights held and change in shareholding or voting rights, even if such change results in shareholding falling below 5%, if there has been any change in such holdings from the last disclosure made under Regulation 13(1) of SEBI Insider Regulations or under this sub-regulation and such change exceeds 2% of total shareholding or voting rights in the company. Any person, who is a director or officer of a listed company, shall disclose to the company in Form D41, the change in shareholding or voting rights held by him and his dependents, if the change exceeds INR 5 lacs in value or 25,000 shares or 1% to total shareholding or voting rights, whichever is lower. The disclosure shall be made within two (2) working days from receipt of intimation of allotment of shares or acquisition or sale of shares or voting rights.
CHAPTER 5
Competition Law:
India, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (MRTP) was the first enactment that came into effect on June 1, 1970 with the object of controlling monopolies, prohibiting monopolistic and restrictive trade practices and unfair trade practices. The commission set up under the MRTP was empowered to inquire into any practice in relation to goods or services which are monopolistic, restrictive or unfair in nature. The complaint may be preferred by a consumer, trade or consumer association or even the Central Government. The commission was armed with powers to pass orders for the discontinuation of the practice. Where the inquiry by the commission reveals that the trade practice inquired into operates or is likely to operate against public interest, the Central Government may pass such orders as it thinks fit to remedy or present any mischief resulting from such trade practice. Prior to 1991, the MRTP also contained provisions regulating mergers and acquisitions. In 1991, the MRTP was amended, and the provisions regulating mergers and acquisitions were deleted. With the changing nature of competition laws, a need was felt for a change in focus, with emphasis on promoting competition rather than curbing monopolies. In
25

Thereafter, Government of India appointed a committee in October, 1999 to examine the existing MRTP Act for shifting the focus of the law from curbing monopolies to promoting competition and to suggest a modern competition law. The Government of India enacted the Competition Act, 2002 ( Competition Act) to replace the existing MRTP. Vide a notification dated August 28, 2009; Section 66 of the Competition Act has been brought into force by virtue of which the MRTP Act was repealed with effect from September 1, 2009. However, the jurisprudence of the MRTP regime while interpreting the substantive provisions of MRTP Act may be of persuasive value while interpreting the substantive provisions of the Competition Act. The Competition Act takes a new look at competition altogether and contains specific provisions on anticompetition agreements, abuse of dominance, mergers, amalgamations and takeovers and competition advocacy. The Competition Commission of India ( CCI) has been established to control anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant position by an enterprise and for regulating certain combinations. The substantive provisions of the Competition Act relating to anti competitive agreements (Section 3) and abuse of dominance (Section 4) have been notified while the provisions relating to combinations (Section 5 and 6) have not yet been notified. Anti competitive agreements: The Competition Act essentially contemplates two kinds of anti competitive agreements horizontal agreements or agreements between entities engaged in similar trade of goods or provisions of services, and vertical agreements or agreements between entities in different stages / levels of the chain of production, in respect of production, supply, distribution, storage, sale or price of goods or services. Anti competitive agreements that cause or are likely to cause an appreciable adverse effect on competition within India are void under the provisions of the Competition Act. A horizontal agreement that (i) determines purchase / sale prices, or (ii) limits or controls production supply, markets, technical development, investment or provision of services, or (iii) shares the market or source of production or provision of services, by allocation of geographical areas/type of goods or services or number of customers in the market, or (iv) results in bid rigging / collusive bidding, are presumed to have an appreciable adverse effect on competition. On the other hand, vertical agreements, such as tie-in arrangements 42, exclusive supply or distribution agreements, etc., are anti competitive only if they cause or are likely to cause an appreciable adverse effect on competition in India. It may be noted that in the case of a vertical agreement, there is no presumption that such agreement would have an appreciable adverse effect on competition in India, and the CCI would have to prove such effect. However, in the case of a horizontal agreement, the burden of proof would lie with the entities that are party to the agreement, to prove that there is no appreciable adverse effect on competition in India.
26

Abuse of Dominant Position: An entity is considered to be in a dominant position if it is able to operate independently of competitive forces in India, or is able to affect its competitors or consumers or the relevant market in India in its favor. The Competition Act prohibits an entity from abusing its dominant position. Abuse of dominance would include imposing unfair or discriminatory conditions or prices in purchase/sale of goods or services and predatory pricing, limiting or restricting production / provision of goods/services, technical or scientific development, indulging in practices resulting in denial of market access etc. Regulation of Combinations: Certain combinations defined under the Competition Act are considered to affect competition in India and are regulated by the CCI, such as: An acquisition where the transferor and transferee jointly have, or a merger or amalgamation where the resulting entity has, (i) assets valued43 at more than Rs. 10 billion or turnover of more than Rs. 30 billion, in India; or (ii) assets valued at more than USD 500 million in India and abroad, of which assets worth at least Rs 5 billion are in India, or, turnover more than USD 1500 million of which turnover in India should be at least Rs 15 billion. An acquisition where the group to which the acquired entity would belong, jointly has, or a merger or amalgamation where the group to which the resulting entity belongs, has: (i) assets valued at more that Rs. 40 billion or turnover of more than Rs 120 billion, in India; or (ii) assets valued at more than USD 2 billion in the aggregate in India and abroad, of which assets worth at least Rs 5 billion should be in India, or turnover of more than USD 6 billion, including at least Rs 15 billion in India. A share subscription, financing facility or any acquisition by a public financial institution, FII, bank or venture capital fund pursuant to any loan or investment agreement, would not qualify as a combination that will be regulated by the CCI, and such transactions are therefore exempt under the Competition Act. However, the public financial institution, FII, bank or venture capital fund is required to notify the CCI of the details of the acquisition within 7 day of completion of the acquisition. Mandatory reporting: Where previously reporting of a combination was optional, proposed amendments to the Competition Act make it mandatory for persons undertaking combinations, to give prior notice to the CCI. The information is to be provided to the CCI in the prescribed format within 30 days of the approval of the combination or the execution of any agreement or other document for acquisition. The combination will become effective only after the expiry of 210 days from the date on which notice is given to the CCI, or after the CCI has passed an order approving the combination or rejecting the same. The lengthy waiting period may impact time lines in the closing of mergers and acquisitions, and the cost involved in waiting out the period of 210 days. However, the wording of the proposed
27

clause seems to suggest that if the CCI delays an order longer than the prescribed 210 days, the combination would be deemed to have been approved by the CCI, therefore removing the uncertainty of waiting for the completion of a potentially elongated regulatory process, as well as forcing the regulators to act in an expeditious manner. In case of a failure to notify the CCI, or contravention of its orders, the Competition Act inter alia provides for certain penalties, civil liability and criminal liability, depending on the nature of the failure/contravention.
CHAPTER 6
Case Study:
Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) and Reliance Petroleum Ltd. (RPL) merger:
Historically every company that Reliance Industries Ltd has floated has been folded into the mothership at some stage. This way, the promoters have always been able to increase their stake in the mothership. Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) and Reliance Petroleum Ltd. (RPL) informed the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) separately that a meeting of the respective board of directors of the companies was held on today, inter alia, to consider and recommend the amalgamation of RPL with RIL. It was announced at the time when RPL was going to start its refinery in full capacity. Also this news came when the option for Chevron to acquire another 24% in RPL was going to get expired. Looking at the uncertain economy and low crude price which can hit the earnings of RIL, the parent company; it was a good move to merge RPL such that volatility in earnings of RIL can be countered. Such practices will shields RIL shareholders from the risk that any new project faces till it reaches completion. In fact it will add more value to RIL than RPL. RPL is currently a 71 per cent subsidiary of RIL; it was created in 2005 as a 100 per cent export oriented petroleum refinery and polypropylene plant in the SEZ at Jamnagar in Gujarat. When fully functional it will be the sixth largest refinery unit in the world. In April 2006, RILs stake fell to 75 per cent following both the sale of a 5 per cent stake to US oil major Chevron for Rs. 1,320 crore and its jumbo IPO which was subscribed more than 50 times for Rs 1,43,500 crore, a record broken only in January 2008 by the Reliance Power IPO of the rival Ambani group. RILs stake fell further to 71 per cent after the controversial open market sale of its own shares worth 4.01 per cent equity stake in RPL in late 2007.
28

The timing of the move to merge RPL into RIL is close to the expiry of the option that Chevron has to pick up an additional 24 per cent stake in RPL or to exit from the company altogether. This deadline is July 2009.
Combined Market Cap

RIL
RPL
199093.56
34290.00
233383.56
This outscripts the No.2 Company in the sensex by market cap by over Rs.80000 crore.
Total No. of shareholders

RIL RPL 2222947 2147699
Refining Capacity (Barrels/day)

RIL RPL 660000 580000
Combined, the Reliance refineries would be the worlds largest at a singe site. The major reasons for uniting are:CHEVRON( US based company) was having 5% stake in RPL and had the option to pick up an addition 24% stake in RPL or to exit from the company altogether. The deadline was July 2009. (ii) If the CHEVRON had increased its stake to 29% then RIL which earlier had 71% stake would now have 47% stake in the company, clearly a minority stake. (iii) It would have cost CHEVRON $6 billion during 2007 for the 24% stake, but now due to the current decline in RPL prices, the same 24% stake would have cost them merely $1.6 billion. So Mukesh Ambani decided not to allow the 24% stake been taken by CHEVRON and to do this they went for the merger. (iv) THE COMBINED REFINING capacity will be 1.24 million barrels of crude/day (6, 60,000 bpd from RIL and 5, 80,000 bpd from RPL). It would make the Reliance, in the list of 50 most profitable companies and the top five producer of polypropylene.
(i)
29

(v) (vi) Its script will have enhanced weightage in all the stock indices (currently RIL is having weightage of 15% in BSE top 30 companies, which will increase to 20% after the merger). The other important reason might be that, this merger will give monopoly to RIL in negotiating the crude price. As we can notice from the table below, after merging the companies their combined capacity would be very high.
Higher Financial Strength & Flexibility: The deal is expected to enhance the position of RIL as an integrated global energy major. Markets ascribe higher valuation for integrated energy companies vis-a-vis standalone refiners due to better competitive position and reduced earnings volatility. This merger of RPL is expected to transform RIL to be among worlds 50 most profitable companies; top ten non-states owned refining company globally; top 15 independent upstream companies; and five largest producers of poly propylene in the world. RIL will have enhanced weight ages in domestic indices; it will also gain significantly from higher financial strength and flexibility. The merger is likely to be earnings accretive for RIL from the first year itself. It will have operational synergies from combined business in areas such as crude sourcing, product placement, process optimization and logistics, besides consolidation of a world-class operating refinery asset. The combined capacity of the two companies expected to be 1.24 million barrels of oil a day. At present RIL produces 6.60 lakh barrels and RPL produces 5.80 lakh barrels a day. The merger would help the combined entity save on income tax and dividend distribution tax. It would also create a much bigger balance sheet that would help Reliance Industries raise money for working capital and expansion. The merger of Reliance Industries and Reliance Petroleum is also a move towards integration of group businesses and will create huge market value of a whopping Rs 2, 33,000 cr. Shareholders and the market is excited over the prospects of this merger so think of the buzz and the market value that would be generated if the two brothers decide to bury their differences! Statement filed to BSE by RIL says: Merger is Indias largest ever. RPL shareholders to receive 1 (one) share of RIL for every 16 (sixteen) shares of RPL. RIL will issue 6.92 crore new shares, thereby increasing its equity capital to Rs. 1643 crore. RILs holding in RPL to be cancelled. No fresh treasury stock created. RIL to be a top 10 private sector refining company globally. RIL to become the worlds largest producer of Ultra Clean Fuels at single location.
30

Merger to unlock greater efficiency from scale and synergies. Merger to be EPS accretive. RIL to have 3.7 million shareholders. Commenting on the merger, Mukesh Ambani, Chairman and Managing Director, RIL said: This merger follows Reliance Industries philosophy of creating enduring value for all our stakeholders. It is a significant step in our goal to be among the largest global corporations. Merger Benefits and Synergies: Reliance Industries, which owns the world's biggest refinery complex, is looking at additional cash flows, tax benefits, continuity of export status and other synergies in its attempt to merge Reliance Petroleum with itself, after a 54 per cent decline in stock prices. The biggest benefit for RIL seems to be using additional cash flows generated by RPL which can be used to step up investment and expansion of its oil & gas exploration business. "RPL will start generating cash. A smart thing is to merge RPL with RIL, which can use the RPL cash flows to fund its expansion,'' an analyst with a local brokerage said. RPL is expected to report a profit of about Rs 4,500 crore (Rs 45 billion) in 2009-10 while RIL expects to post a profit of more than Rs 19,000 crore (Rs 190 billion) in 2009-10. Yet another factor motivating the merger may be the continuity of tax benefit accruing from a special economic zone for another five years. The RIL refinery enjoyed a ten-year tax holiday, sales tax deferment and other tax rebates, all of which ended a couple of years back when it sought an export-oriented unit. But the Jamnagar refinery is set to lose its EoU status, entailing tax incentives, next month as the term expires. Additionally RIL will save on transfer pricing on use of KG Basin gas and other related products between the two companies. The company will also save on taxes to be paid arising out of the transfer resulting in savings of about $1-1.5 for every barrel of crude processed, analysts said. The savings will occur at a time when refining margins are under pressure because of a slump in oil prices. As for RPL, with the completion of the refinery, the cash flow generated will help Reliance Industries in enhancing its investment in exploration and production business, analysts said. "Overall it seems a good move from Reliance Industries' perspective,'' Deepak Pareek, an analyst with Angel Broking said. On the basis of the market price of the two companies the swap ratio works out to 17 shares of RPL for every one share of RIL, while if the company opts to swap shares on the basis of book value the swap ratio will be 20:1.
31

Analysts believe that RIL may swap each of its share for every 18 shares of RPL. For investors of RPL, even though it may be seem to be a losing proposition, in the current market situation, it would make sense for them to convert their holding into a larger company which has a wide variety of businesses rather than invest in a company with a single income stream. The Merger will result in RIL: Operating two of the worlds largest, most complex refineries. Owning 1.24 million barrels per day (MBPD) of crude processing capacity, the largest refining capacity at any single location in the world. Emerging as the worlds 5th largest producer of Polypropylene Merger Details: Under the terms of the proposed merger RPL shareholders will receive 1 share of RIL for every 16 RPL shares held by them. The appointed date of merger of RPL with RIL is 1st April 2009. RIL will cancel its holding in RPL. Based on the recommended merger ratio, RIL will issue 6.92 crore new equity shares to the existing shareholders of RPL. This will result in a 4.4% increase in equity base from Rs.1574 crore to Rs.1643 crore. Consequently, the promoter holding in RIL will reduce from 49% to 47%. Reliance Industries Limited: RIL is Indias largest private sector company on all major financial parameters with a turnover of Rs.139269 crore (US$ 34.7 billion), cash profit of Rs.25205 crore (US$ 3.8 billion) and net worth of Rs.81449 crore (US$ 20.3 billion) as of March 31, 2008. RIL is the first private sector company from India to feature in the Fortune Global 500 list of Worlds Largest Corporations and ranks 103 rd amongst the worlds Top 200 companies in terms of profits. RIL is amongst the 30 fastest climbers ranked by Fortune. RIL features in the Forbes Global list of the worlds 400 big companies and in the FT Global 500 list of the worlds largest companies. RIL ranks amongst the Worlds 25 Most Innovative Companies as per a list compiled by the US financial publication Business Week in collaboration with the Boston Consulting Group. Reliance Petroleum Limited:
32

RPL is a subsidiary of RIL. RPL is setting up Greenfield petroleum refinery and polypropylene plant in a Special Economic Zone at Jamnagar in Gujarat. With an annual crude processing capacity of 580000 barrels per stream day (BPSD), RPL will be the sixth largest refinery in the world.
Conclusion:
There is little to stop Indian companies that desire to be global names for playing the merger and acquisition game globally. With a plethora of financing options, this aspiration has become a reality for many corporate houses, who can now boast of having the best in the industry under their wings. Indian companies have often surpassed their foreign counterparts in corporate restructuring both within and beyond the national frontiers. At present, an Indian company is not permitted to merge with a foreign entity; this prohibition should be removed in order for companies to be able to explore all possible restructuring options, and choose the most viable given their commercial requirements. The competition law in India should also be made less formalistic and speedy in order to facilitate the process. Mergers and acquisitions are powerful indicators of a robust and growing economy. The legal framework for such corporate restructuring must be easy and facilitative and not restrictive and mired in bureaucratic and regulatory hurdles. The biggest obstacle in the way of completing a merger or an amalgamation remains the often long drawn out court procedure required for the sanction of a scheme of arrangement. As George Bernard Shaw is reputed to have said We are made wise not by the recollection of our past, but by the responsibility for our future, and the future of India is bright indeed.
33

Mergers and Acquisitions (

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mergers and Acquisitions (

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mergers and Acquisitions (

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

A

PROJECT ASSIGNMENT ON MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Habib Sarkar Roll No. 565

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Research Methodology and Limitation of Study:

Habib Sarkar Roll No. 565

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Mergers and Acquisitions Across Indian Sectors:

Habib Sarkar Roll No. 565

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Mergers and Acquisitions in India: the Latest Trends:

Habib Sarkar Roll No. 565

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Habib Sarkar Roll No. 565

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Acquisition and Takeover:

Habib Sarkar Roll No. 565

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Distinction between Mergers and Acquisitions:

Benefits of Mergers and Acquisitions:

Habib Sarkar Roll No. 565

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Habib Sarkar Roll No. 565

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Reasons for mergers and acquisitions:

Reasons for Failure of Mergers and Acquisitions:

Habib Sarkar Roll No. 565

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Habib Sarkar Roll No. 565

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Habib Sarkar Roll No. 565

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Habib Sarkar Roll No. 565

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Habib Sarkar Roll No. 565

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Habib Sarkar Roll No. 565

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Habib Sarkar Roll No. 565

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Habib Sarkar Roll No. 565

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Habib Sarkar Roll No. 565

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Habib Sarkar Roll No. 565

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Habib Sarkar Roll No. 565

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Habib Sarkar Roll No. 565

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Habib Sarkar Roll No. 565

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Habib Sarkar Roll No. 565

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Habib Sarkar Roll No. 565

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Habib Sarkar Roll No. 565