This document provides a comparison of the AMW 1618 TP vehicle to its main competitors in the mining and transportation market. The market size is approximately 25,000 vehicles. The AMW 1618 TP has several advantages over its competitors, including higher engine power and torque, larger clutch size, stronger frame, and higher gradeability. A total cost of ownership analysis for stone mining in Panvel shows the 1618 TP has a 22% lower cost per ton transported compared to the closest competitor, the VECV Terra 16 HDR. Therefore, the document concludes the AMW 1618 TP is the most suitable model for overloading applications like mining based on its superior specifications and lower operating costs.
This document provides a comparison of the AMW 1618 TP vehicle to its main competitors in the mining and transportation market. The market size is approximately 25,000 vehicles. The AMW 1618 TP has several advantages over its competitors, including higher engine power and torque, larger clutch size, stronger frame, and higher gradeability. A total cost of ownership analysis for stone mining in Panvel shows the 1618 TP has a 22% lower cost per ton transported compared to the closest competitor, the VECV Terra 16 HDR. Therefore, the document concludes the AMW 1618 TP is the most suitable model for overloading applications like mining based on its superior specifications and lower operating costs.
This document provides a comparison of the AMW 1618 TP vehicle to its main competitors in the mining and transportation market. The market size is approximately 25,000 vehicles. The AMW 1618 TP has several advantages over its competitors, including higher engine power and torque, larger clutch size, stronger frame, and higher gradeability. A total cost of ownership analysis for stone mining in Panvel shows the 1618 TP has a 22% lower cost per ton transported compared to the closest competitor, the VECV Terra 16 HDR. Therefore, the document concludes the AMW 1618 TP is the most suitable model for overloading applications like mining based on its superior specifications and lower operating costs.
This document provides a comparison of the AMW 1618 TP vehicle to its main competitors in the mining and transportation market. The market size is approximately 25,000 vehicles. The AMW 1618 TP has several advantages over its competitors, including higher engine power and torque, larger clutch size, stronger frame, and higher gradeability. A total cost of ownership analysis for stone mining in Panvel shows the 1618 TP has a 22% lower cost per ton transported compared to the closest competitor, the VECV Terra 16 HDR. Therefore, the document concludes the AMW 1618 TP is the most suitable model for overloading applications like mining based on its superior specifications and lower operating costs.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 23
1618 TP
Contents Market
Present Competition Aggregate Brief
Present Competition Aggregate wise Comparison with Competition
Product Superiority wrt Competition
Application Suitability on basis of TCO Comparison
Market Market Size (Approx) 6000
Segment
Sub Segment Stone
Mining
Iron Ore Coal Sand Stone Chips Soil/Earth work Sand Stone Chips Soil/Earth work
AMW 1618 TP Higher load carrying ability Better Pulling Power Climbing gradients with ease Strong and Rugged Aggregates Enhanced Aggregate Life
Higher Loads
Lower Maintenance Cost
More Earnings
Less Expenses
Higher Profits More than 100 vehicles on road till date
Aggregate Brief 180 HP Cummins Engine . Clutch 380 mm dia SETCO.
6S Eaton HD Gear Box FGR-9.01 Suspension: Front-Semi elliptical leaf spring with shock absorber Rear-Semi elliptical leaf spring. Rear Axle Meritor MS 13 1497; RAR-6.17 Cabin- Hydraulic Tilt able AC Cabin. Tyres-10.00X20-16 PR Front 10.00X20-16 PR Rear Tipping Body- 8.5 and 10 Cum Box.
Double chassis HSLA Steel. Ladder type Bolted cross members. 256 x 75 x 7mm channel reinforced with inner channel section of 5mm thick. (same as AMW 2518 TP)
AMW 1618 TP- Grade ability 43% (highest in the category of 4X2 mass market Tipper)
Aggregate wise comparison with competition
Engine AMW 1618 TP 178
Model
TML SK 1616 155
TML LPK 1616
155
TML LPK 1618
178
AL U 1616
AL U 1618
VECV Terra 16 HDR
147
Engine Power (max) Engine Torque (max)
160
180
675
630
630
675
550
660
471
AMW 1618 TP: 24Valves BSIII complaint engine for faster acceleration, better pick up & grade ability. Max. Power 178HP@2500rpm. Max. Torque- 675Nm@1500rpm. Service Reparability even by local mechanics.
AMW 1618 TP-Highest Engine Power and Torque in the category
Benefits Higher load carrying ability
Clutch AMW 1618 TP 380
Model
TML SK 1616 352
TML LPK 1616
352
TML LPK 1618
380
AL U 1616
AL U 1618
VECV Terra 16 HDR
332
Clutch dia (mm)
355
380
AMW 1618 TP: 380 dia clutch for higher durability. Ceramic lining for long life. Clutch booster for fatigue free operation.
AMW 1618 TP - Largest Clutch Dia. in the category Benefits Higher load carrying ability Better clutch life Lesser Maintenance Cost
Gear Box
AMW 1618 TP Gear Box ES 9306 A 9.01 1st 5.27 2nd 3.22 3rd 2.04 4th 1.36 5th 1.00 6th 8.63 Rev Model
AMW 1618 TP - Highest First Gear Ratio in the category Benefits Higher load carrying in gradients with Ease
Propeller Shaft
AMW 1618 TP-1710 Series (GB to rear Axle) TML, ALL and VECV- 1600 Series AMW 1618 TP-Best in the category (Serrated flange) Benefits Serrated flange design helps direct power transmission which results in higher flange bolt life. (improved reliability)
Suspension
Model No. of leaves Thickness
AMW 1618 TP TML LPK 1616 Front 11 10 11-14 mm 10-14 mm Rear
Main
AL 1616 10 10-15 mm
VECV Terra 16 HDR 9 4-13 mm 5-16 mm
No. of leaves Thickness
11 8-16 mm 3-15 mm
13 4-14 mm 9-16 mm Helper
13 13-13.5 mm
11 4-13 mm 7-16 mm
No. of leaves Thickness
5 5-15 mm
3 3-14 mm
9 9-11 mm
10 10-13 mm
Benefits No need to add leaves till 16T (payload) usage
Axle
Front Heavy Duty Forged I Section Reverse Elliot type.
Benefits Reliable Meritor rear axle suitable for higher loads
Frame
Double chassis HSLA Steel. Ladder type Bolted cross members. 265 x 75 x 7mm channel reinforced with inner channel section of 5mm thick. Model Frame Dimens ion (mm)
AMW 1618 TP 256X75X7 (inner channel 5 mm thick)
TML LPK 1616
286X65X7
TML LPK 1618
AL U 1616
AL U 1618
VECV Terra 16 HDR
285X76X6
286X65X7
275X90X6
275X90X6
AMW 1618 TP-Double chassis, best in the category Benefits Established AMW rugged chassis in tipper market. No chassis crack even at higher loads.
Load Body and Hydraulics
HYVA (FC110) Hydraulics with good service support. SRTRPN13Material used for body floor sheet. Improved underbody construction with increased no. of cross members.
Load Body Options- 8.5 & 10 Cum Box
Product Superiority-Specification Comparison
AMW vs TML AMW 1618 TP 178 675 380 9.01 6.17
Parameters Engine Power (HP) Engine Torque (Nm) Clutch Dia (mm)
TML LPK 1618
178 675 380 8.57 5.86
TML LPK 1616
155 630 352 6.58 6.83
TML SK 1616 155 630 352 6.58 5.86
First Gear Ratio
RAR TCD (mtr) Grade ability
14.3 43%
14.4 42%
14.4 31%
13.1 26%
TCD is better wrt TML LPK1616 and LPK 1618
AMW 1618 TP is distinctly superior wrt TML in all parameters
AMW vs AL
Parameters Engine Power (HP) Engine Torque (Nm) Clutch Dia (mm) First Gear Ratio RAR TCD (mtr) Grade ability
AMW 1618 TP 178 675 380 9.01 6.17 14.3
AL U 1618 180 660 380 8.51 5.83 14
AL U 1616 160 550 355 8.28 5.57 13.2
43%
36%
27%
Grade ability is much higher wrt AL
AMW 1618 TP is distinctly superior wrt AL in all parameters
AMW vs VECV VECV Terra 16 HDR 147 471
Parameters Engine Power (HP) Engine Torque (Nm)
AMW 1618 TP 178 675
Clutch Dia (mm)
First Gear Ratio RAR TCD (mtr) Grade ability
380 9.01 6.17 14.3
332 7.736 6.857 12.8
43%
22.5%
Grade ability is much higher wrt VECV
AMW 1618 TP is distinctly superior wrt VECV in all parameters
Torque at Wheels (TAW)
Torque at Wheels 40000 35000 32745 Nm 30000 Torque (Nm)
AMW 1618TP-Highest Torque at wheels in all gears. Benefits Higher load carrying in gradients with Ease
Application Suitability on basis of TCO Comparison
AMW 1618 TP vs VECV Terra 16 HDR, Stone Mining, Panvel Observations: AMW 1618 TP load carrying capacity is 27% higher wrt VECV Terra 16 HDR. AMW 1618 TP is 8% more fuel efficient than VECV Terra 16 HDR. AMW 1618 TP Capital cost is 23% higher wrt VECV Terra 16 HDR
TCO Benefits: TCO/Ton for AMW 1618 TP (Rs 37.5/Ton) is 22% less wrt VECV Terra 16 HDR (Rs 45.5/Ton) Extra Savings of Rs 15,19,564/- in 4 years as compared to competition
AMW 1618 TP is more suitable for mining/overloading applications
TCO Split
Maintenanc Driver e cost Expenses 4% 7%
AMW 1618 TP
Tyre Cost 2%
TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP
Location Application Model
Panvel Stone Mining
AMW 1618 VECV Terra TP 16 HDR Diesel Cost 43%
Capital Cost 38% Vehicle Registration Fees Interest Lost 0.33% in Down downpayme Insurance Payment nt @8% Premium 3% 1% 2% Tyre Cost 2%
Total Cost of ownership over life cycle period Fixed Cost 2,715,833 Operational Cost 3,582,000 Total Cost 6,297,833 Total running over life cycle period (km) 84,000 Total payload carried over life cycle 168,000 period (T) TCO (Rs/T) 37.49 AMW 1618 wrt VECV Terra 16 HDR 22% (TCO% Rs/T) Revenue Freight Rate (Rs/T) 50 Net profit/Ton (Rs/T) 12.51 Net Profit/month 43,795
