Hooley Marketing in The 21st-Century
Hooley Marketing in The 21st-Century
Hooley Marketing in The 21st-Century
with
Total (5638)
93% 64% 41% 80% 90% 68% 44% 55%
UK (487)
93% 69% 26%* 75% 86% 63% 21%* 65%
Pressures on Marketing
Increasingly demanding customers Heterogeneous & fragmenting markets
Market Performance
Sales Volume, Market Share, Customer Satisfaction
Overall Performance
Financial and Market Top vs Bottom 10%
Learning Orientation
We continually question our own views of the market place Our organisational values include learning as a key to improvement Employee training is seen as an investment rather than as a cost Our ability as an organisation to learn is a key competitive advantage
0 10 20 Top 24 26 39 30 Bottom 40 UK 50 60 13 9 23
25 22 42
35 27 50
3.2
3.4
3.6
3.8
4.2
4.4
4.6
Market research
We are good at using information about markets, customers and competitors We understand customer needs and requirements well Our market research focuses on understanding customer needs and requirements We make extensive use of market research in our organisation
0 9 2 14 5 10 15 Top 20 Bottom 25 UK 30 35 40 10 1 28
20 7 34
18 11 27
2.5
2.7
2.9
3.1
3.3
3.5
3.7
Technological
Economic
Political
Social Legal
Market Orientation
Customer satisfaction is systematically and frequently assessed Our people know how to add value for our customers Our strategies are driven by the creation of customer satisfaction Our commitment to serving customer needs is closely monitored
0 10 20 Top 26 23 50 25 19 45
27 21 48
33 31 54
30 Bottom
40 UK
50
60
4.2
4.4
4.6
4.8
5.2
5.4
Product-Led Marketing
What do we make?
Customer-Led Marketing
Resource-Based Marketing
Competitive Positioning
Degree of Customisation Degree of innovation Low Price Offerings Customer service provided Technical product/service quality 0
5 12 23 5 13 12 23 16 15 17 35 27 18 22
10
15
Top
20
Bottom
25
UK
30
35
40
Price Positioning
Average Netherlands Greece Slovenia China Hong Kong Poland Hungary Australia New Zealand Finland Austria Ireland United Kingdom 3.24 2.97 3.23 3.32 3.04 3.31 3.31 3.26 3.14 3.35 3.22 3.25 3.31
2.9
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
Quality Positioning
Average Netherlands Greece Slovenia China Hong Kong Poland Hungary Australia New Zealand Finland Austria Ireland United Kingdom 3.63 3.71 3.62 3.72 3.35 3.76 3.76 3.55 3.56 3.71 3.64 3.63 3.95
3.25
3.35
3.45
3.55
3.65
3.75
3.85
3.95
4.05
Service Positioning
Average Netherlands Greece Slovenia China Hong Kong Poland Hungary Australia New Zealand Finland Austria Ireland United Kingdom 3.58 3.63 3.78 3.81 3.29 3.84 3.88 3.56 3.7 3.76 3.7 3.85 3.91
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
Innovation Positioning
Average Netherlands Greece Slovenia China Hong Kong Poland Hungary Australia New Zealand Finland Austria Ireland United Kingdom 3.44 3.52 3.39 3.6 3.15 3.66 3.68 3.37 3.29 3.56 3.41 3.71 3.46
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
Customization Positioning
Average Netherlands Greece Slovenia China Hong Kong Poland Hungary Australia New Zealand Finland Austria Ireland United Kingdom 3.56 3.56 3.69 3.58 3.64 3.69 3.76 3.61 3.66 3.77 3.67 3.69 3.82
3.5
3.55
3.6
3.65
3.7
3.75
3.8
3.85
Positioning Examples
Low price, no frills
Customization Low Price Quality
Innovation
Service
Low Price
Quality leader
Customization Quality
Innovation
Service
Positioning Examples
Innovation & Customization
Customization Low Price Quality
Service
Service leader
Customization Quality
Innovation
Service
Company or brand name and reputation Credibility through being established in the market Superior levels of customer service and support Relationships with key target customers
9
13 55 36 14 51 18 36 25 11 37
10
20
Top
30
Bottom
40
UK
50
60
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
4.1
4.2
Cost advantage in production Superior marketing information systems Superior cost control systems
5 16
5 1 15
4 3 15
4 17
5
Top
10
Bottom UK
15
20
2.9
2.95
3.05
3.1
3.15
3.2
3.25
3.3
5 24 10
Extent or nature of distribution network The uniqueness of the distribution approach Relationships with distribution channel intermediaries
4 29 7 2 21 5 3 14
10
15
Top
20
25
UK
30
35
Bottom
3.03
3.08
3.13
3.18
3.23
3.28
3.33
3.38
2 17 4
Access to partner's technology Access to partner's managerial knowhow Access to partner's finance
2 15 4 2 13 5 2 10
5
Top
10
Bottom UK
15
20
2.9
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
10
20
Top
30
Bottom UK
40
50
3.45
3.55
3.65
3.75
3.85
3.95
4.05
Customer Prospect
(Source: Adrian Payne 1995)
Management Capabilities
14
4 31 8
3 21 11
3 24 11
2 27
10
15
Top
20
25
UK
30
35
Bottom
Management Capabilities
Average Netherlands Greece Slovenia China Hong Kong Poland Hungary Australia New Zealand Finland Austria Ireland United Kingdom 3.46 3.24 3.41 3.55 3.18 3.57 3.59 3.21 3.3 3.28 3.46 3.37 3.75 3.41
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
10
Top
15
Bottom
20
UK
25
30
3.05
3.15
3.25
3.35
3.45
3.55
3.65
3.75
Networking Capabilities
Ability to manage relationships with suppliers Good at pooling expertise with partners
2 16 6 5 3 23 5
3 16 5
3 17
10
Top
15
Bottom UK
20
25
Networking Capabilities
Average Netherlands Greece Slovenia China Hong Kong Poland Hungary Australia New Zealand Finland Austria Ireland United Kingdom 3.33 3.39 3.43 3.46 3.34 3.4 3.48 3.51 3.56 3.63 3.37 3.72 3.44
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
UK Performance Model
Performance
Customer Performance .25 Market Performance .21 Financial Performance .49
.44
Hooley, Greenley, Cadogan, Fahy J. (2005) "The performance impact of marketing resources" forthcoming Journal of Business Research