7 Design For Static Loading

Module
3
Design for Strength
Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

Lesson
1
Design for static loading

Instructional Objectives
At the end of this lesson, the students should be able to understand
• Types of loading on machine elements and allowable stresses.

• Concept of yielding and fracture.
• Different theories of failure.
• Construction of yield surfaces for failure theories.
• Optimize a design comparing different failure theories
3.1.1Introduction
Machine parts fail when the stresses induced by external forces exceed their
strength. The external loads cause internal stresses in the elements and the
component size depends on the stresses developed. Stresses developed in a
link subjected to uniaxial loading is shown in figure-3.1.1.1. Loading may be due
to:
a) The energy transmitted by a machine element.
b) Dead weight.
c) Inertial forces.
d) Thermal loading.
e) Frictional forces.

3.1.1.1A- Stresses developed in a link subjected to uniaxial loading
In another way, load may be classified as:
a) Static load- Load does not change in magnitude and direction and
normally increases gradually to a steady value.
b) Dynamic load- Load may change in magnitude for example, traffic of
varying weight passing a bridge.Load may change in direction, for
example, load on piston rod of a double acting cylinder.
Vibration and shock are types of dynamic loading. Figure-3.1.1.2 shows load vs
time characteristics for both static and dynamic loading of machine elements.
Load
Time
Static Loading
Load Load Load
Time Time Time
Dynamic Loading
3.1.1.2F - Types of loading on machine elements.

3.1.2 Allowable Stresses: Factor of Safety
Determination of stresses in structural or machine components would be

meaningless unless they are compared with the material strength. If the induced
stress is less than or equal to the limiting material strength then the designed
component may be considered to be safe and an indication about the size of the
component is obtained. The strength of various materials for engineering
applications is determined in the laboratory with standard specimens. For
example, for tension and compression tests a round rod of specified dimension is
used in a tensile test machine where load is applied until fracture occurs. This
test is usually carried out in a Universal testing machine of the type shown in
clipping- 3.1.2.1. The load at which the specimen finally ruptures is known as
Ultimate load and the ratio of load to original cross-sectional area is the Ultimate
stress.
3.1.2.1V SPACE FOR A UNIVERSAL TENSILE TEST CLIPPING
Similar tests are carried out for bending, shear and torsion and the results for
different materials are available in handbooks. For design purpose an allowable
stress is used in place of the critical stress to take into account the uncertainties
including the following:
1) Uncertainty in loading.
2) Inhomogeneity of materials.
3) Various material behaviors. e.g. corrosion, plastic flow, creep.
4) Residual stresses due to different manufacturing process.

5) Fluctuating load (fatigue loading): Experimental results and plot- ultimate
strength depends on number of cycles.
6) Safety and reliability.
For ductile materials, the yield strength and for brittle materials the ultimate
strength are taken as the critical stress.
An allowable stress is set considerably lower than the ultimate strength. The ratio
of ultimate to allowable load or stress is known as factor of safety i.e.
Ultimate Stress
= F.S.
Allowable Stress
The ratio must always be greater than unity. It is easier to refer to the ratio of
stresses since this applies to material properties.
3.1.3 Theories of failure
When a machine element is subjected to a system of complex stress system, it is

important to predict the mode of failure so that the design methodology may be
based on a particular failure criterion. Theories of failure are essentially a set of
failure criteria developed for the ease of design.
In machine design an element is said to have failed if it ceases to perform its
function. There are basically two types of mechanical failure:
(a) Yielding- This is due to excessive inelastic deformation rendering the
machine
part unsuitable to perform its function. This mostly occurs in ductile
materials.
(b) Fracture- in this case the component tears apart in two or more parts. This
mostly occurs in brittle materials.
There is no sharp line of demarcation between ductile and brittle materials.
However a rough guideline is that if percentage elongation is less than 5%
then the material may be treated as brittle and if it is more than 15% then the

material is ductile. However, there are many instances when a ductile
material may fail by fracture. This may occur if a material is subjected to
(a) Cyclic loading.
(b) Long term static loading at elevated temperature.
(c) Impact loading.
(d) Work hardening.
(e) Severe quenching.
Yielding and fracture can be visualized in a typical tensile test as shown in the
clipping- Typical engineering stress-strain relationship from simple tension
tests for same engineering materials are shown in figure- 3.1.3.1.
(True)
Stress
U
f (Engineering)
σy Y
P
Elastic range Plastic range Strain
3.1.3.1F- (a) Stress-strain diagram for a ductile material e.g. low carbon
steel.

Stress
(True)
U f (Engineering)
0.2 % offset Strain
3.1.3.1F- (b) Stress-strain diagram for low ductility.

Stress
f (Ultimate fracture)
Strain
3.1.3.1F- (c) Stress-strain diagram for a brittle material.

Stress
σy
Strain
3.1.3.1F- (d) Stress-strain diagram for an elastic – perfectly plastic
material.

For a typical ductile material as shown in figure-3.1.3.1 (a) there is a definite yield
point where material begins to yield more rapidly without any change in stress
level. Corresponding stress is σy . Close to yield point is the proportional limit
which marks the transition from elastic to plastic range. Beyond elastic limit for an
elastic- perfectly plastic material yielding would continue without further rise in
stress i.e. stress-strain diagram would be parallel to parallel to strain axis beyond
the yield point. However, for most ductile materials, such as, low-carbon steel
beyond yield point the stress in the specimens rises upto a peak value known as
ultimate tensile stress σo . Beyond this point the specimen starts to neck-down
i.e. the reduction in cross-sectional area. However, the stress-strain curve falls till
a point where fracture occurs. The drop in stress is apparent since original cross-
sectional area is used to calculate the stress. If instantaneous cross-sectional
area is used the curve would rise as shown in figure- 3.1.3.1 (a) . For a material
with low ductility there is no definite yield point and usually off-set yield points are
defined for convenience. This is shown in figure-3.1.3.1. For a brittle material
stress increases linearly with strain till fracture occurs. These are demonstrated
in the clipping- 3.1.3.2 .
SPACE FOR FATIGUE TEST CLIPPING

3.1.3.2V
3.1.4 Yield criteria
There are numerous yield criteria, going as far back as Coulomb (1773). Many of
these were originally developed for brittle materials but were later applied to
ductile materials. Some of the more common ones will be discussed briefly here.

3.1.4.1 Maximum principal stress theory ( Rankine theory)
According to this, if one of the principal stresses σ1 (maximum principal

stress), σ2 (minimum principal stress) or σ3 exceeds the yield stress, yielding
would occur. In a two dimensional loading situation for a ductile material
where tensile and compressive yield stress are nearly of same magnitude
σ1 = ± σy
σ2 = ±σy
Using this, a yield surface may be drawn, as shown in figure- 3.1.4.1.1.
Yielding occurs when the state of stress is at the boundary of the rectangle.
Consider, for example, the state of stress of a thin walled pressure vessel.
Here σ1= 2σ2, σ1 being the circumferential or hoop stress and σ2 the axial
stress. As the pressure in the vessel increases the stress follows the dotted
line. At a point (say) a, the stresses are still within the elastic limit but at b, σ1
reaches σy although σ2 is still less than σy. Yielding will then begin at point b.
This theory of yielding has very poor agreement with experiment. However,
the theory has been used σ2 successfully for brittle materials.
+σy
..
a b
σ1
-σy +σy
-σy
3.1.4.1.1F- Yield surface corresponding to maximum principal stress

theory

3.1.4.2 Maximum principal strain theory (St. Venant’s theory)
According to this theory, yielding will occur when the maximum principal strain
just exceeds the strain at the tensile yield point in either simple tension or
compression. If ε1 and ε2 are maximum and minimum principal strains
corresponding to σ1 and σ2, in the limiting case
1
ε1 = ( σ1 − νσ 2 ) σ1 ≥ σ 2
E
1
ε2 = ( σ 2 − νσ1 ) σ 2 ≥ σ1
E
This gives, Eε1 = σ1 − νσ 2 = ±σ 0
Eε 2 = σ 2 − νσ1 = ± σ 0
The boundary of a yield surface in this case is thus given as shown in figure-
3.1.4.2.1 σ2=σ0+νσ1
σ2
+σy
-σy +σy
σ1
-σy σ1=σ0+νσ2
3.1.4.2.1- Yield surface corresponding to maximum principal strain theory

3.1.4.3 Maximum shear stress theory ( Tresca theory)
According to this theory, yielding would occur when the maximum shear
stress just exceeds the shear stress at the tensile yield point. At the tensile
yield point σ2= σ3 = 0 and thus maximum shear stress is σy/2. This gives us
six conditions for a three-dimensional stress situation:
σ1 − σ 2 = ± σ y
σ 2 − σ3 = ±σ y
σ 3 − σ1 = ± σ y
σ2
+σy
-σy +σy σ1
-σy
3.1.4.3.1F- Yield surface corresponding to maximum shear stress

theory
In a biaxial stress situation ( figure-3.1.4.3.1) case, σ3 = 0 and this gives
σ1 − σ 2 = σ y if σ1 > 0, σ 2 < 0
σ1 − σ 2 = −σ y if σ1 < 0, σ 2 > 0
σ2 = σ y if σ 2 > σ1 > 0
σ1 = −σ y if σ1 < σ 2 < 0
σ1 = −σ y if σ1 > σ 2 > 0
σ 2 = −σ y if σ 2 < σ1 < 0

This criterion agrees well with experiment.
In the case of pure shear, σ1 = - σ2 = k (say), σ3 = 0
and this gives σ1- σ2 = 2k= σy
This indicates that yield stress in pure shear is half the tensile yield stress and
this is also seen in the Mohr’s circle ( figure- 3.1.4.3.2) for pure shear.
σ2 σ1
σ
3.1.4.3.2F- Mohr’s circle for pure shear
3.1.4.4 Maximum strain energy theory ( Beltrami’s theory)
According to this theory failure would occur when the total strain energy
absorbed at a point per unit volume exceeds the strain energy absorbed per
unit volume at the tensile yield point. This
1 1
may be given ( σ1ε1 + σ 2ε 2 + σ3ε3 ) = σ y ε y by
2 2
1 1
( σ1ε1 + σ 2ε 2 + σ3ε3 ) = σ yε y
2 2
Substituting, ε1, ε2 , ε3 and εy in terms of stresses we have
σ12 + σ 2 2 + σ32 − 2υ ( σ1σ 2 + σ 2 σ3 + σ3σ1 ) = σ y 2
This may be written as

2 2
⎛ σ1 ⎞ ⎛ σ2 ⎞ ⎛σ σ ⎞
⎜ ⎟ + ⎜ ⎟ − 2ν ⎜ 1 22 ⎟ = 1
⎜ σy ⎟ ⎜ σy ⎟ ⎜ σy ⎟
⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠

This is the equation of an ellipse and the yield surface is shown in figure-
3.1.4.4.1 .
σ2
σy
σy E(1− ν)
σy E(1+ ν)
σ1
-σy σy
-σy
3.1.4.4.1F- Yield surface corresponding to Maximum strain energy theory.
It has been shown earlier that only distortion energy can cause yielding but in
the above expression at sufficiently high hydrostatic pressure σ1 = σ2 = σ3 = σ
(say), yielding may also occur.
From the above we may write σ2 ( 3 − 2ν ) = σ2y and if ν ~ 0.3, at stress level
lower than yield stress, yielding would occur. This is in contrast to the
experimental as well as analytical conclusion and the theory is not
appropriate.
3.1.4.5 Distortion energy theory( von Mises yield criterion)
According to this theory yielding would occur when total distortion energy
absorbed per unit volume due to applied loads exceeds the distortion energy
absorbed per unit volume at the tensile yield point. Total strain energy ET and
strain energy for volume change EV can be given as
1 3
ET = ( σ1ε1 + σ 2ε 2 + σ3ε3 ) and E V = σav ε av
2 2
Substituting strains in terms of stresses the distortion energy can be given as

2(1 + ν) 2
Ed = ET- EV =
6E
(
σ1 + σ 2 2 + σ32 − σ1σ 2 − σ 2 σ3 − σ3σ1 )
At the tensile yield point, σ1 = σy , σ2 = σ3 = 0 which gives
2(1 + ν) 2
E dy = σy
6E
The failure criterion is thus obtained by equating Ed and Edy , which gives
( σ1 − σ 2 ) + ( σ 2 − σ3 ) + ( σ3 − σ1 ) = 2σ 2y
2 2 2
In a 2-D situation if σ3 = 0, the criterion reduces to

σ12 + σ 2 2 − σ1σ 2 = σ y 2
2 2
⎛ σ ⎞ ⎛ σ ⎞ ⎛ σ ⎞⎛ σ ⎞
i.e. ⎜ 1 ⎟ + ⎜ 2 ⎟ − ⎜ 1 ⎟ ⎜ 2 ⎟ = 1
⎜ σy ⎟ ⎜ σy ⎟ ⎜ σy ⎟ ⎜ σy ⎟
⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠
This is an equation of ellipse and the yield surface is shown in figure-3.1.4.5.1 .
This theory agrees very well with experimental results and is widely used for
ductile materials.
σ2
45o
σy
σy
-σy σy σ1
0.577 σy
-σy
3.1.4.5.1F- Yield surface corresponding to von Mises yield criterion.

3.1.5 Superposition of yield surface
A comparison among the different failure theories can be made by superposing
the yield surfaces as shown in figure- 3.1.5.1.
σ2
Maximum principal strain theory
σy
Maximum distortion energy theory
-σy
σy σ1
Maximum shear stress theory
Maximum principal stress theory
-σy
3.1.5.1F- Comparison of different failure theories.
It is clear that an immediate assessment of failure probability can be made just

by plotting any experimental in the combined yield surface. Failure of ductile
materials is most accurately governed by the distortion energy theory where as
the maximum principal strain theory is used for brittle materials.
3.1.6 Problems with Answers
Q.1: A shaft is loaded by a torque of 5 KN-m. The material has a yield point of
350 MPa. Find the required diameter using
(a) Maximum shear stress theory
(b) Maximum distortion energy theory
Take a factor of safety of 2.5.

A.1:
Torsional shear stress induced in the shaft due to 5 KN-m torque is
16 x(5 x103 )
τ= where d is the shaft diameter in m.
πd 3
(b) Maximum shear stress theory,
2
⎛ σx − σy ⎞ 2
τmax =± ⎜ ⎟ +τ
⎝ 2 ⎠
σY 350 x106
Since σx = σy = 0, τmax=25.46x103/d3 = =
2xF.S. 2x 2.5
This gives d=71.3 mm.

In this case σ1 = 25.46x103/d3
σ2 = -25.46x103/d3
According to this theory,
( σ1 − σ 2 ) + ( σ 2 − σ3 ) + ( σ1 − σ3 ) = 2 ( σ Y )
2 2 2 2
F.S
Since σ3 = 0, substituting values of σ1 , σ2 and σY

D=68 mm.
Q.2: The state of stress at a point for a material is shown in the figure-3.1.6.1.
Find the factor of safety using (a) Maximum shear stress theory (b) Maximum
distortion energy theory. Take the tensile yield strength of the material as 400
MPa.
σ x=40 MPa
τ=20 MPa
σ y=125 MPa
3.1.6.1F

A.2:
From the Mohr’s circle, shown in figure-3.1.6.2
σ1 = 42.38 MPa
σ2 = -127.38 MPa
(a) Maximum shear stress theory
σ1 − σ2 σ
= Y
2 2xF.S
This gives F.S = 2.356.
( σ1 − σ 2 ) + ( σ 2 − σ3 ) + ( σ1 − σ3 ) = 2 ( σ Y )
2 2 2 2
F.S
If σ3 = 0 this gives F.S = 2.613.
σ2 σ1
τ σx=20 MPa σy=120 MPa σ
τ=-20 MPa
80 MPa
44.72 MPa
σ2 σ1
σx=20 MPa σy=120 MPa σ
τ=-20 MPa
80 MPa
44.72 MPa
3.1.6.2F

Q.3: A cantilever rod is loaded as shown in the figure- 3.1.6.3. If the tensile
yield strength of the material is 300 MPa determine the rod diameter
using (a) Maximum principal stress theory (b) Maximum shear stress
theory (c) Maximum distortion energy theory.
120
mm
x
A B
C
D
F=2KN
P=
T =800 Nm 10
KN
3.1.6.3F
A.3:
At the outset it is necessary to identify the mostly stressed element. Torsional
shear stress as well as axial normal stress is the same throughout the length
of the rod but the bearing stress is largest at the welded end. Now among
the four corner elements on the rod, the element A is mostly loaded as
shown in figure-3.1.6.4
16T
(Torsional shear stress)
πd 3
2
⎛ πd ⎞
P ⎜ ⎟ (Axial stress)
A ⎝ 4 ⎠
32FL
(Bending stress)
πd 3
3.1.6.4F

VQ
Shear stress due to bending is also developed but this is neglected
It
due to its small value compared to the other stresses. Substituting values
of T, P, F and L, the elemental stresses may be shown as in figure-
3.1.6.5:
⎛ 12732 2445 ⎞
⎜ 2
+ 3 ⎟
⎝ d d ⎠
⎛ 4074 ⎞
⎜ 3 ⎟
⎝ d ⎠
3.1.6.5F
This gives the principal stress as
2 2
1 ⎛ 12732 2445 ⎞ 1 ⎛ 12732 2445 ⎞ ⎛ 4074 ⎞
σ1,2 = ⎜ + 3 ⎟± + 3 ⎟ +⎜ 3 ⎟
2⎝ d 2
d ⎠ 4 ⎜⎝ d 2 d ⎠ ⎝ d ⎠
(a) Maximum principal stress theory,
Setting σ1 = σY we get d = 26.67 mm.
(b) Maximum shear stress theory,
σ1 − σ2 σY
Setting = , we get d = 30.63 mm.
2 2
(c) Maximum distortion energy theory,
( σ1 − σ 2 ) + ( σ 2 − σ3 ) + ( σ1 − σ3 ) = 2 ( σ Y )
2 2 2 2
Setting
We get d = 29.36 mm.

3.1.7Summary of this Lesson
Different types of loading and criterion for design of machine parts
subjected to static loading based on different failure theories have been
demonstrated. Development of yield surface and optimization of design
criterion for ductile and brittle materials were illustrated.

7 Design For Static Loading

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

7 Design For Static Loading

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

7 Design For Static Loading

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Module

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

At the end of this lesson, the students should be able to understand

• Types of loading on machine elements and allowable stresses.

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

Load Load Load

Time Time Time

3.1.1.2F - Types of loading on machine elements.

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

Determination of stresses in structural or machine components would be

3.1.2.1V SPACE FOR A UNIVERSAL TENSILE TEST CLIPPING

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

3.1.3 Theories of failure

When a machine element is subjected to a system of complex stress system, it is

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

Elastic range Plastic range Strain

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

0.2 % offset Strain

3.1.3.1F- (b) Stress-strain diagram for low ductility.

3.1.3.1F- (c) Stress-strain diagram for a brittle material.

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

SPACE FOR FATIGUE TEST CLIPPING

3.1.4 Yield criteria

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

According to this, if one of the principal stresses σ1 (maximum principal

3.1.4.1.1F- Yield surface corresponding to maximum principal stress

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

3.1.4.2.1- Yield surface corresponding to maximum principal strain theory

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

3.1.4.3.1F- Yield surface corresponding to maximum shear stress

In a biaxial stress situation ( figure-3.1.4.3.1) case, σ3 = 0 and this gives

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

3.1.4.3.2F- Mohr’s circle for pure shear

3.1.4.4 Maximum strain energy theory ( Beltrami’s theory)

Substituting, ε1, ε2 , ε3 and εy in terms of stresses we have

σ12 + σ 2 2 + σ32 − 2υ ( σ1σ 2 + σ 2 σ3 + σ3σ1 ) = σ y 2

This may be written as

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

3.1.4.4.1F- Yield surface corresponding to Maximum strain energy theory.

3.1.4.5 Distortion energy theory( von Mises yield criterion)

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

In a 2-D situation if σ3 = 0, the criterion reduces to

3.1.4.5.1F- Yield surface corresponding to von Mises yield criterion.

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

3.1.5.1F- Comparison of different failure theories.

It is clear that an immediate assessment of failure probability can be made just

3.1.6 Problems with Answers

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

(b) Maximum distortion energy theory

Since σ3 = 0, substituting values of σ1 , σ2 and σY

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

If σ3 = 0 this gives F.S = 2.613.

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

We get d = 29.36 mm.

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

You might also like