THE ART OF METOPOSCOPY: A STUDY IN ISAAC LURIA'S CHARISMATICKNOWLEDGE

by

LAWRENCEFINE Amongstthe most importantroles which Isaac Luria(1534-1572), the Safed, played in the lives of his preeminentkabbalistof sixteenth-century discipleswas that of physicianof the soul. Beforethey couldpracticerituals which wereintendedto enablethem to bind theirsouls to the divinerealm, and to "repair"that realm in accordancewith the teachingsof Lurianic mythology, his discipleshad first to mend their ownsouls, to cleanse and No whoseown soul had failedto purifythemof all imperfection.' individual achievea certainlevel of perfectioncould hope to engagesuccessfully the in

1. The major exposition of Lurianic mythology is by I. Tishby, Torat ha-Ra ve-ha-Kelippah be-Kabbalatha-Ari (Jerusalem, 1960). See also idem, "Gnostic Doctrines in Sixteenth Century Jewish Mysticism," Journal of Jewish Studies 6 (1955); G. Scholem, Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism (New York, 1941), lecture 7; idem, Sabbatai Sevi (Princton, 1973), pt. 1. For a general introduction to the religious life of Safed in the sixteenth century, see L. Fine, Safed Spirituality (New York, 1984).

79

80

LAWRENCE FINE

and intricate elaborate rituals-suchas the Yibudim2-which contemplative

committed.Luria,in fact, providedhis followerswith highlydetailedrituals of atonementby whichthey wereto mendtheirsouls. Thesepenitentialacts were known as tikkuneiavonot("amendsof sin") whose purpose, in the wordsof IHayyim Vital'sson Shmuel,was to "mendhis soul" and "cleanse him from the filth of the diseaseof his sins."3 IHayyimVital (1542-1620),
Luria's chief disciple, himself introduces the tikkunei avonot with a dis-

cussion of the relationshipbetween one's soul and sin.4 The following passage provides a lucid account of the Lurianictheory of sin and the of effectiveness genuine repentance:
Man is createdfrom matterand from form, which consists of soul [nefesh], and the spirit[ruah], super-soul [neshamah], divineportionfromabove,as it is said: "and [God]breathedinto his nostrilsthe breath[nishmat] life" [Gen. of 2:7]. And his body is dark matterfrom the side of the "shell,"luring and man from [achieving] of preventing perfection his soul [inorder]to cut it [i.e., his soul] off from the Tree of Life .... and so "thereis not a righteousman upon the earth that doeth good and sinnethnot" [Eccles.7:20].It is known that sin is a blemish,stain,and rustin the soul, andthat it is the sicknessof the in and puresoul. Whenit [is immersed] filth and stain,it is unableto perceive achieve the true perfection,which is [attainmentof] the mysteriesof the Torah.... And the transgression becomesa barrierseparating soul from the her Creator,preventingher from perceivingand comprehending holy and matters,as it is said:"Thelaw of the Lordis perfect,restoring pure supernal the soul" [Ps. 19:8].... When the soul is pure and unblemished, then the supernalholy matters take shapein her, and when she dwellsin rust and stain everything becomes bittersweet as [i.e.,evil appears good]. [Thisis] similarto the sick personwho, when he is ill, abhorsthe good things and loves things which aggravatehis

see 2. For a detailed study of the Yihzudim, L. Fine, "The Contemplative Practice of Yihudimin Lurianic Kabbalah," in Jewish Spirituality, ed. A. Green, vol. 2 (Crossroad, forthcoming). 3. The tikkunei avonot are discussed in Sha'ar Ruaz ha-Kodesh of the Shemonah She'arim, pp. 40-64 (see below, n. 4). They are studied in the above-mentioned article. 4. Hayyim Vital was responsible for the most detailed versions of Lurianic teachings, among which the Shemonah She'arim ("Eight Gates") is the most important. All references to the Shemonah She'arim are to the Yehudah Ashlag edition (Tel Aviv, 1962).

THE ART OF METOPOSCOPY

81

illness. The doctor, in orderto restorehis health,gives him spices,including was, andhis healthas gall, by whichhis naturewill returnto whatit originally fromher,mustreceivethe before.So, too, the sicksoul, to removethe sickness in and bitternessof medicineand "return" [the form of] mortification fasts, from filth and stripes,ritualimmersions, and purifications sackcloth,ashes, and the stains of sin. [Thisis] in orderto be able to attain and comprehend supernalmatters,which are the mysteriesof the world.5 Only the weapons of ascetic piety are potent enough to cleanse the soul of the filth that clings to it. Luria himself, proclaims Vital, is the diagnostician and healer of diseased souls! Luria's powers stem from the spirit of prophecy which he possessed, meriting him divine light and esoteric knowledge with which to teach his followers. But Luria only revealed his knowledge to those disciples who were completely pure and worthy. To this end he prescribed for each of his students personalized penitential deeds to meet their specific needs. He would not revealany of the mysteriesof this holy knowledgeto one in whose soul he perceived,with the aid of the Holy Spirit,a blemish-until he out gave him penitentialacts to straighten all he did crookedly.And like the doctorwho prescribes each sickpersonthe propermedicine cure for to expert this illness,so too [IsaacLuria],mayhe restin peace,usedto recognize sin, the tell him wherehe had incurreda blemish,and prescribe him the penitenfor tial act neededfor this transgression orderto cleansehis soul, so that he in could receivethe divine light, as it is written:"O Jerusalem, wash thy heart from wickedness,that thou mayestbe saved" [Jer.4:14].6 Isaac Luria did what any good physician would do; he carefully diagnosed the specific maladies which his "patient" had and prescribed the appropriate cure. Among the several diagnostic techniques which Luria had

at his disposal, accordingto HayyimVital and others,the most important

82

LAWRENCE FINE

similar arts such as chiromancy(palmistry)and physiognomy(form and shape of various other physical features,particularlyfacial features).As with these other "sciences,"metoposcopywas employedfor purposesof judging an individual'scharacterand personality,and in many cases, for predictingone's future.As Jewishsourcesthemselvesattest, a variationof in this art was knownat least as earlyas late antiquity,but it flourished the Middle Ages and most especiallyin the Renaissance.In the sixteenthand seventeenthcenturiesthe publicationof metoposcopicworks proliferated. Like chiromancy,metoposcopywas primarilyconcernedwith the significance of lines, in this case, on the forehead,and was typicallyassociated with astrologicalnotions.' The purposeof the presentstudyis to examinethe theoryandpracticeof metoposcopy according to Lurianic teachings, and, more broadly, to this explorethe waysin which Luria'sdisciplesregarded type of knowledge on their master'spart.

abilitieswith In the various lists detailingIsaac Luria'sextraordinary which our sources provide us, one of the standarditems is his skill at metoposcopy. in his it them[even] for Concerning attainments, is impossible oneto relate and thesearethe wondrous true terms,no less in detail.However, general whichI witnessed my owneyes:He knewhowto makea future with things or from soulappear before aswellasthesoulof a living deceased him, person, of he theearlyas wellas latersages.He couldinquire themwhatever among and of wished of concerning knowledge thefuture secret mysteries theTorah. to be would appear him also Theprophet Elijah, hismemory a blessing, may and the on andteachhim.He couldalsorecognize letters theforehead [was that as the of at] adept thescience physiognomy, wellas at [recognizing] lights at areuponthe skinandbodyof an individual. wasalsoskilled recog[He
7. For treatments of non-Jewish approaches to metoposcopy, see L. Thorndike, A History of Magic and Experimental Science (New York, 1923-58), especially vols. 6-8; K. Seligman, Magic, Supernaturalismand Religion (New York, 1948), pp. 256-261; S. Alexandrian, Histoire de la philosophie occulte (Paris, 1983), pp. 201-203. Concerning the development of the physiognomic arts in Judaism, see nn. 11-12 below.

THE ART OF METOPOSCOPY

83

nizing]the lights in the hair, the chirpingof birds,and the languageof trees even the speechof inanimatethings,as Scripture and plants. [He understood] "For the stone shall cry out of the wall [andthe beamout of the timber says: shall answerit]" [Hab. 2:11]. [He knew] the languageof the burningcandle and the flaming coal; he was able to see the angels who announceall the proclamations[fromon high], as is well known,and to conversewith them. all His knowledgewas expertconcerning the plantsand the genuineremedies Therearemanyothersuchthingswhichcannotevenbe [whichtheyprovided]. related. Those who hear of them will not believe them when told. I have recordedthat which my eyes have seen in all truth.8 The theoretical basis for the recognition of letters upon the forehead ha-par;uf) has to do with a set of kabbalistic beliefs concerning (.hokhmat the relationship between language and creation as a whole. These beliefs go back, in part, to the first systematic attempt at speculative thought in Hebrew, the Sefer Yetirah, probably written sometime between the third and sixth centuries.' According to the opening chapter of this brief and highly enigmatic book, God brought all of creation into existence "by means of thirty-two wondrous paths of wisdom." These thirty-two paths comprise "ten sefirot beli mah," the ten fundamental numbers, and the twenty-two letters of the Hebrew alphabet. The bulk of the book's speculative efforts concern the function and role of these letters in the process of cosmogony. Everything that exists came into being through combinations of the alphabet's letters, particularly by means of two hundred and thirty-one "gates," combinations of the letters into sets of two in which every letter of the alphabet is joined to every other. All existence is invested with these different combinations of letters and is nourished by their power. When, centuries later, medieval kabbalists appropriated the ideas of the Sefer Ye;irah, this linguistically founded world was understood as an
8. SRH, p. 19. Other versions of this list are found in Sefer ha-Gilgulim(Przemysl, 1875), p. 26; Shivhei ha-Ari (Bardejov, 1929), pp. 6-7; Sefer Toledot ha-Ari, ed. M. Benayahu (Jerusalem, 1967), p. 156; Eleh Toledot Yighak, Benayahu, pp. 248-251. 9. For discussion of the Sefer Yegirah,see G. Scholem, Ursprungund Anfdnge der Kabbala (Berlin, 1962), pp. 20-29; idem, "The Name of God and the Linguistic Theory of the Kabbalah," Diogenes 79 (1972): 59-80; idem, Kabbalah (New York, 1974), pp. 23-30. See as well the studies by I. Weinstock and N. Aloni in Temirin, vol. 1 (Jerusalem, 1972), pp. 9-99. Luria's use of the Sefer Yepirahin this connection is explicitly acknowledged, SRH, pp. 15-16. For broader discussions of the relationship between language and Kabbalah, see G. Scholem, On the Kabbalah and Its Symbolism (New York, 1965), pp. 32-86; idem, the Diogenes article mentioned above, as well as its continuation in Diogenes 80 (1972): 164-194.

84

LAWRENCE FINE

or expressionof divineself-disclosure emanation.Accordingto this conception, the Hebrewlettersand theircombinationsare not merelyinstruments by which the Creatorwroughtcreation,but forms assumedby the divine itself. That is, not only can the revelationof deity be describedin termsof the ten sefirot, the most familiar and typical symbolic system of the kabbalists,but it can be imaginedas well as the everunfoldingwordof God which expressesitself in a virtuallyinfinite variety of combinationsand gradations.In this symbolismthe Torahis understoodto comprisea vast of concentration networkof "names,"each of which signifiesa particular divine power or energy. As such these "names" possess a plenitude of meaningnot exhaustedby conventionalhuman language. of constitution all creationmoreevident Nowhereis the divine/linguistic than in the case of humanbeingsthemselves.Accordingto HIayyim Vital, the twenty-two lettersof the alphabetarepresentin eachof the threeaspects of the human soul, in ascending hierarchicalorder, nefesh, ruab, and 0 so neshamah. Eachis constructed, to speak,on the basisof the lettersof the and Hebrewalphabet.The character qualityof each set of lettersare somewith the differentlevels of the soul's tripartite what differentin accordance division. The letterspresentin the nefeshare small, those of the ruabare are mediumin size, and those of the neshamah largest of all. These three dimensionsof soul clothe one another, as it were, with the body's skin the constituting outercoveringof all. In the case of a wickedindividual,the lights/lettersof the soul remain covered and concealed by the skin. But when a personperfectshimselfby practicing commandments studyand the the Torah,he graduallypurifiesthe variouspartsof soul, thus enabling ing the power and light of the letterswithineach part to come to the surface.
10. SRH, p. 16. This idea is already found in the Zohar, in the context of its discussion of physiognomic matters. See, for example, Zohar 2, 73a, where we learn that the mystery of the twenty-two letters is engraved within the ruah of an individual, and that these letters can appear on the face. According to the anthropological views of the Kabbalah, the soul is considered to have three aspects. The nefesh is automatically present and active in every individual; the two more elevated levels, however, are latent. These manifest themselves only in the case of persons who are spiritually advanced and who have strived to develop themselves through religious activity. Such activity aids in the cultivation of the higher powers of cognition and results in the fullest maturation of the soul. Later kabbalists-including the Lurianists-added two other levels of soul. These are hayyah and yehidah, and are considered to represent still higher stages of spiritual attainment, present only in the most select figures. These two aspects of soul do not figure in the Lurianic discussion of metoposcopy.

THE ART OF METOPOSCOPY

85

The lettersare unveiledand manifestthemselves a way whichis visibleto in the skilledeye. The appearance the letterson the skin allowsone who can of theirmeaningvirtuallyto see the divinepart recognizethem and determine of the human personality,the soul itself. One "sees" the soul in the sense that the lettersare a relatively materialexpression that whichis otherwise of immaterial.In the case of one who has sufficientlymendedall threegrades of soul, the entirealphabetbelongingto eachgradewill appear,at one time or another, on the body's skin, most especiallyupon the forehead." Accordingto Vital, the foreheaddisclosesthe soul's lettersbest of all, due, in part,to the factthatthe lettersof the alphabetas a wholecorrespond to the sefirahBinah,which, in turn, is symbolizedby the forehead."2 The
11. SRH, pp. 15-16. The primary Lurianic account of metoposcopy is found in SRH, pp. 15-22. The earliest Jewish interest in physiognomy, in general, appears to go back to a Qumran document, published as 4Q 186. According to this text certain physiognomic criteria, such as the size and shape of the thighs, toes, fingers, hair, eyes, beard, teeth, height, and quality of voice, can be examined to ascertain an individual's moral and spiritual status. Such criteria, along with a person's zodiacal sign, were used to determine a person's fitness for membership in the "House of Light," that is, the righteous among Israel. Concerning this, see Discoveries in the Judean Desert, vol. 5, Qumran Cave 4, ed. J. M. Allegro (Oxford, 1968), pp. 89-91. Physiognomic considerations play little role in conventional rabbinic materials, but were of great interest to the Merkavah mystics. As in the Qumran text, the Merkavah literature indicates that physiognomic criteria were employed to determine eligibility for admission into the circle of mystics. These criteria have to do with the character of the nose, lips, eyes, eyebrows, eyelashes, and sexual organs, although greatest significance was attached to the lines and letters upon the palm and forehead. These texts already speak, albeit in an unsystematic and exceedingly obscure way, of certain letters which appear on the hand and forehead. The primary text in this connection is Hakkarat Panim le-Rabbi Yishmael,which speaks of twelve letters that are visible on the forehead, although it does not specify which letters these are. This chapter and related materials are analyzed in two articles by G. Scholem, "Hakkarat Panim ve-Sidrei Sirtutin," in Sefer Assaf (Jerusalem, 1953), pp. 459-495 (see particularly, pp. 481-485), and "Ein Fragment zur Physiognomik und Chiromantic aus der Spatantiken judischen Esoteric," in Liber Amicorum: Studies in Honor of Professor Dr. C. J. Bleeker (Leiden, 1969); see also idem, "Chiromancy," in Scholem's Kabbalah (Jerusalem, 1974), pp. 317-319; I. Gruenwald, "Ketaim mi-Sifrut Hakkarat Panim ve-Sidrei Sirtutin," Tarbiz40 (1971): 301-319; .Hadashim idem, Apocalyptic and Merkavah Mysticism (Leiden, 1980), pp. 218-224. The most extensive treatment of physiognomy, chiromancy, and metoposcopy in medieval Jewish literature, prior to the Lurianic texts, is found in the zoharic corpus. Concerning this, see below, n. 12. 12. SRH, pp. 15-16. While the Lurianic notions of metoposcopy described here do not appear to have any direct link to the material found in the Merkavah literature (see above, n. 11), they are unmistakably indebted, at least to some degree, to the fairly extensive discussions in the zoharic corpus. The literature of the Zohar treats physiognomic, chiromantic, and metoposcopic issues in several places, including: (1) Zohar 2, 71a-78a (along with the parallel version in Raza de-Razin); (2) Zohar 2, 272b-276a; (3) Zohar Iadash 35b-37c; and (4) Tikkunei Zohar, tikkun 70. These speculations are based, in part, on exegesis of Exodus 18:21.

86

LAWRENCE FINE

particularletters which appear on a person's forehead depend upon the commandmentswhich that individualperformsproperly.For there is a letter to correspondto each and every precept(althoughwe are informed about only a few of the details of this correspondence). Thus, the person on who performsall the commandments a regularbasis,and in whom there is no sin, will bearall the lettersupon his forehead.Certainletters,however, will appear more brightlythan at other times under various conditions. lettersshineespecialWhenone performsparticular mi;vot,the appropriate ly brightlyon that same day. Sometimesa certainword-such as the word bayyim(signalingthat a personcan expectto continuein life)-will appear brieflyand then disappear.One skilledin this art, then, must be carefulto gaze at the right time upon an individual'sforehead.An exceptionis the deed of charity(;edakah),whose lettersremainshiningbrightlyupon one's forehead for an entire week. This is demonstrated the scripturaltext: by "And his righteousness[;idkato]endurethforever"(Ps. 111:3). on The levelof soul whichone has achievedis also discernible the basis of the size of the letterswhichappear.Thus, if a personhas only perfected the the level of nefesh, letterswill be small,and so on. If an individualmanifestsonly one set of letters,havingattainedonly the levelof nefesh,and more than one of a particular letteris required spellout a wordon his forehead, to in the letterwill initiallyappearbrightly one placein the word,and reappear a second or third time as needed. The lettersof the alphabetalso possessa sefiroticcorrespondence. That it is possible to identifydifferentletterswith each of the ten sefirot.By is,
While I plan to analyze these materials elsewhere, it is worth noting here certain substantial differences between the Zohar's discussions and the Lurianic one: (1) Whereas the Zohar treats in some detail the several subjects of physiognomy, chiromancy, and metoposcopy-discussing the significance of the hair, forehead, eyes, face, lips, lines on the hand, and the ears-Luria was almost exclusively concerned with metoposcopy, that is, the forehead. He takes up other matters in the most passing way. (2) The Zohar's analysis of metoposcopy is mostly concerned with the shape of the forehead and with the lines or creases appearing in it, and far less with letters. In Luria's case, on the other hand, there is no discussion of anything but the letters and words which manifest themselves. (3) Whereas the Zohar's discussion incorporates elements of astrological speculation, the Lurianic account has only the briefest passing referenceto this (see SRH, p. 16) and is clearly not genuinely concerned with astrology. (4) The Zohar tends to indicate how physical characteristics, such as the shape of the forehead or eyes, signify certain moral and spiritual traits in general ways. Thus, for example, a person is said to be inclined toward anger, impulsiveness, or joyfulness. In our texts, Luria is able to determine the specific sins or righteous acts which a person has performed.

THE ART OF METOPOSCOPY

87

virtue of this one can ascertainthe sefiroticroot of a person'ssoul, for the appropriateletters will appearmore frequentlythan the others.'3 The recitationof the one hundredberakhot (blessings)required daily of individualalso inducesthe manifestationof letters.14For just as the every 613 mi;vot as a whole have their correspondingletters, so too do the berakhot that one recites,such as in the courseof dailyprayer.The lightsof the letters which appear on the skin as a result of recitingberakhotare each light specialinsofaras thereis lightsurrounding letter;this surrounding is moreluminescent thanthat of the letteritself.If one sees that the opposite is the case, that the light of the letteris moreintensethan the surrounding light, it signalsthat the blessingwas not performed properly.Moreover,if one fails to performcertainberakhot theircorresponding letters altogether, If a berakhah recitedwith a mistake,then the letter do not appearat all. is will appearbut will be incompleteor imperfectly formed.And if it is performed correctly, but without appropriatecontemplativeintention, the letter will be present,but will be dark and unillumined. If the appearance letterssignifiesvirtuousbehavior,thentheirabsence of indicates sinfulness,be it a sin of commissionor omission. One who is responsiblefor some transgressionwill be lacking in the corresponding on letters,whichwill therebyfail to displaythemselves his forehead.Indeed, someone upon whose foreheadno lettersare discernible expectto meet can his death withinthirtydays unlesshe performsacts of greatrestitutionand repentance. 5 There are other indicationsof the presenceof sinfulness,or that something tragic has befallen the individualinvolved. Sometimesa particular letter will appearbroken in the middle. In the case of the letter bet, for example, this indicatesthat one's son has died. At other times lettersmay appearupsidedown or lying on theirside. Thereis one letter, for example, which, if it appearsabnormally,indicatesthat a man has had intercourse with his wife in an impropermanner.In this connection,Vital relatesan interestingincident.The wife of a certainindividualhad demandedof him that he engagein intercourse, somethingwhichhe didn'twantto do, sinceit
13. SRH, p. 17. 14. Ibid., p. 18. According to B.T. Menabot 43b, R. Yose declares it to be the duty of everyone to recite one hundred blessings daily, whereas Numbers Rabbah 18 indicates that King David instituted the one hundred daily blessings. 15. SRH, p. 16.

88

LAWRENCE FINE

happened to be a weekday rather than Sabbath, the preferredtime for maritallove. LuriainformedVitalthat he had recognized lettergimelon the the man'sforehead,but that it appeared upsidedown.Thegimel,Luriatold the Vital,symbolizesthe sefirahYesod, sefirahassociatedwithmaleprocreative vitality,humanand divine.Insofaras the man involveddid not intend to stimulateYesodby havingsex at what he consideredto be an improper time, the gimel appearedin this unusualmanner.Luriaindicatedthat such an act should not be considereda transgression, despite the fact that it occurredon a weekday.Were it a sin the letter would have been turned upsidedown, but wouldnot haveshonebrightlyas it did. In general,whena lettermanifestsitself upsidedown, it signifiesthat the realmof the feminine is involved. For this reason, the letterson the foreheadof a male whose soul-ancestry (gilgul)derivesfrom the feminineside of the divine structure will consistentlyappearupside down.16 If a personexperiences nocturnalemission(tumatkeri),says Luria,the a will evidenceof his impurity appearon his foreheadthe followingday. If he seeks to cleansehimselfof this impuritythroughritualimmersionin water, then the evidencewill remainduringthe day but will be only mildlyvisible. the However,if he does not undergoritualimmersion, sin will be discernible until he does so. of The transgressions a person who, by virtue of other deeds he has carried out, merits the "extra" soul which people can acquire on the Sabbath, will not be visible upon the forehead during the course of the Sabbathitself.This is due to the fact that the powersof evil have no potency on the Sabbath.The very presenceof the additionalSabbathsoul can be determinedby gazing upon the forehead.For as soon as one performsthe as for ritualimmersion required preparation the Sabbath,the extraSabbath soul manifestsitself, the evidencefor which is found upon his forehead. we Interestingly, learn that scholarsof the Torah experiencea special If kind of dispensation. a personis a greatscholarof Torah,andparticularly if he is a studentof Kabbalah(hokhmat his ha-emet), studyhas the effectof coveringover the sins for which he is responsible,providingthat they are minor transgressions. such instances,one's sins are not visible upon the In forehead."If, however,they are significantsins, then they will be discernible, scholarlymerit notwithstanding.
16. Ibid., p. 17. 17. Ibid., p. 22.

THE ART OF METOPOSCOPY

89

In this connection, HIayyimVital indicated that there were limitations to his master's abilities to diagnose the status of the soul on the basis of metoposcopy. At times he had to resort to more direct communication with an individual's soul. He possessedanotherkind of skill; he could call forth the nefesh,ru'ah,or neshamah an individual,and speakwith it [directly]. wouldinquireof it of He and ask it questions,and it wouldanswerwhatever was he desiredto know, it even includingmattersof detail.He told me that thereare some thingswhich he is unableto discernwhen he gazes upon the lettersof the forehead,due to theirbeingtoo subtleand concealed.However,whenhe inquiresand searches out a person'ssoul [directly], then he is ableto learnthingswith greataccuracy and clarity.'8 While the forehead was the most common place for the materialization of the soul's letters, they could appear on any part of the body. "Know that in each and every organ of a person's body, there are letters engraved, informing us about that individual's actions. But the primary place is the forehead, as indicated earlier." "9In addition, other parts of the body have special features which are instructive with respect to one's conduct and character, especially the eyes, fingernails, and all types of bodily hair. In the case of hair, for example, color, length, type of hair, and the way that it lies, all are clues to a person's status, although we are provided no details about this.

There are a substantial number of anecdotal reports by Vital and other Safed scholars about Isaac Luria's practice of the art of metoposcopy. Such evidence clearly suggests that Luria actually engaged in this activity, and that it was not merely a matter for theoretical discussion. Moses Galante, for example, writes that he had personally seen sages who had the ability to practice the art of "determining [the letters on] the countenance." 20Similar-

18. Ibid., p. 17. 19. Ibid., p. 20. See nn. 11-12 above. 20. Kohelet Ya'akov (Safed, 1558), p. 57a.

90

LAWRENCE FINE

ly, Elijah de Vidas, author of the influential treatise on kabbalistic piety, Reshit flokhmah, writes: ... our sagestaught:"On seeingthe sagesof Israelone shouldsay, 'Blessedbe of He who hathimparted His wisdomto themthat fearHim'" [B.T.Berakhot 58a]. In Safed, located in the upper Galilee, there have already appeared to sagesfor whomit was appropriate recitethis blessing.Theywerecapableof and ha-parguJ] were able to practicingthe art of physiognomy[bokhmat all informa man concerning that he had done-whether it was good or evil. did To be sure, these individuals not meritthis wonderfulwisdom(whichis akin to possessingthe Holy Spirit)excepton accountof theirvirtuousdeeds and saintly behavior.21 There can be little doubt that both Galante and de Vidas had in mind Isaac Luria, although it is interesting to note that each of them implies that there may have been others with this skill. Eleazar Azikri preserves a story bearing upon Luria's knowledge of metoposcopy in his Sefer .Haredim.22 Azikri reports that Luria once gazed upon the face of a certain sage and told him that "the transgression of cruelty toward animals is inscribed upon your countenance." The distressed man returned home to discover that his wife had failed to feed their turkeys and had left them to wander in the street. After making sure that his wife took corrective action to care properly for the animals he came again before Luria. Without knowing what had taken place, Luria informed him, upon looking into his face, that the transgression had been expiated. The sage then proceeded to tell Luria what had transpired. Vital reports an incident in which Luria gazed upon the forehead of a certain sage and informed him that in his entire life this man had never recited a certain prayer correctly.23 Elsewhere, we learn in more general terms that Luria "used to recognize, upon the forehead of a man, the virtuous deeds and the sins which he had committed or had contemplated committing. He knew the gravity of the injury brought about by each transgression, where [on high] the harm had its impact, and the nature of the harm. He [also] knew the restitution that
21. Elijah de Vidas, Reshit IHokhmah(Venice, 1579), "The Gate of Love," chap. 6. Concerning de Vidas, his relationship to Luria, and Reshit fIokhmah, see Fine, Safed Spirituality, pp. 83 ff. 22. Sefer Iaredim (Venice, 1601), p. 25a. 23. Peri Ez Hayyim (Jerusalem, 1980), Sha'ar ha-Amidah, chap. 19.

THE ART OF METOPOSCOPY

91

was required[forits repair],in termsof fasts,contemplation, the recitaand tion of scriptural verses. He would provideeach and everyindividualwith the means of atonementin accordancewith the sin he had committed."24 Our sourcesalso indicatethat Luriautilizedhis skill for a purposeother than determining person'smoralstatus,althougheven herethe soul's pera fection was at issue. In Sha'ar ha-Gilgulim Vital writes that every single his masterwould gaze upon the face of each of his disciples.He evening would see a scriptural verse shiningupon the forehead;the visualizedverse was one that pertainedto that particular student'ssoul, in accordance with the Lurianicnotion that every soul possesses interpretations Scripture of that areuniqueto it. Luriawouldthenpartially explainthe esotericmeaning of the verse, in terms of the significancethat it held for that individual's to spiritualcondition.The disciplewas theninstructed concentrate uponthe he had been given, and to recitethe versebeforegoing to sleep. explanation He did this so that when his soul ascendedto the upperrealmduringsleep, he might gain full knowledgeof the verse's meaning. In such a way the individual's soul wouldincreasein purity,and ascendto still higherlevelsin the divinerealm,whereit wouldenjoythe revelationof additionalmysteries of the Torah.25 ElsewhereVital describesthis activity in a somewhat differentway. Luriawould gaze upon the foreheadof each studentaftersunset,and determine what kindof text his soul would studythat nightwhenit ascendedon high, be it some rabbinicworksuch as the Mishnah,or an esotericone such as the Zohar. Here too he instructedthe discipleto recite this text before falling asleep.26 Vital also preserves severalanecdotesin whichhe himselfwas involved. On one occasion,he writes,Luriaidentifiedthe lettersalef,bet, andgimelon his forehead.This demonstrated, accordingto Luria,that Vital neededto show compassiontowardhis father.27 a different In versionof this tradition we learn that the letters alef and bet, spellingout the word av ("father"), were writtenin normal fashion, while the gimel was upside down.28

24. This report is found in a somewhat legendary account of Luria's activities, Eleh Toledot Yi;bak, ed. Benayahu in his Sefer Toledot ha-Ari, p. 251. 25. Sha'ar ha-Gilgulim of the Shemonah She'arim, hakdamah 17. 26. Sha'ar ha-Mi;vot, Ve-ethanan, p. 87. 27. SRH, p. 17. 28. Sefer Toledot ha-Ari. Benayahu, p. 190.

92

LAWRENCE FINE

In Sefer ha-fIezyonot,Vital's dream diary, he describes an incident accordingto which Luria is reported,on a Sabbatheve, to have seen on Vital's forehead the words, "Preparea throne for Hezekiah, king of 29 that he was investedwiththe soul of King Hezekiah Judah." This revealed as his "extra"Sabbathsoul, says Vital. Sometimeduringthat Sabbathday Vital becameangrywhile in his house, by reasonof which Hezekiah'ssoul departed.The followingweek Vitalrepentedfor havingbeen angry,whereupon, on the next Sabbath eve, Luria recognized the spirits of both Hezekiahand Rabbi Akiva upon Vital's forehead.Again, however,Vital anger,causingthese spiritsto leave him. After Vital had wept experienced and repentedonce again for the sin of anger,Luriainformedhim that the spiritof BenAzzai had investeditselfin him, despitethe fact that BenAzzai Ben Azzai was, however, and Vital did not share the same soul-ancestry. Akiva's son-in-law. In this story, then, Luriais reportedto have been able to determine the coming and going of Vital'svisiting souls by gazing on his forehead.It is to interesting observethat in this seriesof incidentsLuriais not said to have the determined deeds for which Vital was responsible,but the effectthose deeds had upon his spiritualstate. In anotherentryin his diary,Vitalreportsa storywith a similartheme.30 His teacheris able to explainthe meaningof a dreamthat Vitalhad by reference to the name of Rami bar Hami, which Luriahad seen on Vital'sforehead the eveningbefore.The conclusionLuriareachedwas that Vital was amoraicsage. In Sha'arha-Mi;vot investedwith the soul of this Babylonian Vital preserves anotherstory, accordingto which he spoke the nameof yet Samael(i.e., Satan)while conversingwith someoneat night.The following morningLurialooked at his face and told him that he had violatedthe prohibitionagainstutteringthe namesof othergods. WritesVital, "he strictly neither duringthe day nor the warned me that under no circumstances, night, should I utter Samael'sname."To do otherwisecan have injurious consequences,causingone to fall prey to sin or to be punished."3 to The commonfeaturein theseincidentsis IsaacLuria'srolein bringing
ed. A. Z. Aeshcoly (Jerusalem, 1954), p. 165. Concerning Vital's 29. Sefer ha-IHezyonot, soul-ancestry in general, and his relationship to Hezekiah in particular, cf. pp. 143-144, 174, 184, 191, 198. 30. Sefer ha-IHezyonot,p. 173. 31. Sha'ar ha-Mi;vot, Mishpatim, p. 36.

THE ART OF METOPOSCOPY

93

Vital'sattentiona sin he had committed,eitherby explicitlyinforminghim of what he had done wrongor, as in the caseof the Hezekiahstory,by deterhim. miningwhetherthe souls withwhichhe had beeninvestedhad deserted makeit clearthat Luria with the ones described These reports,along earlier, the did not use this techniquefor purposesof predicting future;nowhereare we told that Luriahad propheticknowledgeof what was to come. Rather, he employedthe art of metoposcopyin order to determinethe status of a person's spiritualcondition on the basis of his actions. Whilewe cannot know whetherthe incidentsreportedhere occurredas described,whatthese storiesdo tell us is that Luria'spracticeof this artwas sufficientlycommonplacefor it to be mentionedas a matter of fact. In these incidentswas not to impress Vital's case the motivationin narrating the readerwith Luria'sskill as much as to informhim about Vitalhimself. wisdom The readercould be expectedto be familiarwith the remarkable and knowledgewhich Isaac Luria exhibited.
III

The accounts by Ijayyim Vital and others concerningIsaac Luria's practiceof metoposcopypromptimportantquestionshavingto do with the characterof Luria'sknowledgeand the source of his authority.While the present study cannot treat these complex issues in the detail they deserve, even a general discussion of such questions will enable us to place the phenomenonof metoposcopywithin a broaderLurianiccontext. Vital's discussionof the variousesotericskills Luriapossessed,and the types of knowledgehe exhibited,as seenearlier,32 suggeststhe way in which Luria's followers regarded these abilities. They are, in Vital's words, "wondrousand true things"which"it is impossiblefor one to relate."One has to witness them in order to comprehendtheir extraordinary nature. Their wondrouscharacterhad to do, in significantpart, with the fact that they demonstratedLuria'smasterfulability to communicatewith a wide range of heavenlymessengers.Thus he could speak with the souls of departedsages, from the distantas well as the more recentpast, inquiringof them "knowledge the futureand secretmysteriesof the Torah."He could of

32. See above, sec. I.

94

LAWRENCE FINE

communicate with the angels on high "who announce all the proclamations ... and converse with them." He was able to comprehend the language of birds, a language which contains mysteries from above. Most significantly, he experienced revelations from a heavenly agent of even greater importance than the rest of these, Elijah the prophet. As Vital reports, "Elijah would constantly reveal himself to him, speaking to him directly, and instruct him in these mysteries."33Luria, then, was considered to have easy and ongoing access to the heavenly realm, and to be uniquely adept at holding direct conversations with a wide assortment of ancient prophets, teachers, and angels. The deep wisdom, knowledge, and skills acquired by these means, moreover, were believed to be largely unavailablethrough conventional methods of attaining knowledge of the Torah, namely, intellectual study. Vital makes this clear in rather explicit terms: are The secretsof the Torahand her mysteries not revealedto humanbeings the power of their intellects,but only by means of divine vitalitywhich by and flows fromon high, throughGod's messengers angels,or throughElijah the prophet,may his memorybe a blessing.34 Vital amplifies this point in the following words: ... there is no doubt that these matters[i.e., esotericknowledge]cannot be by apprehended meansof humanintellect,but only throughKabbalah,from one individual[directly] another,directly to fromElijah,mayhis memorybe a or directlyfrom those souls which reveal themselvesin each and blessing, every generationto those who are qualifiedto receivethem.35 In this context, Vital provides us with Luria's views regarding the history of the transmission of kabbalistic knowledge. Kabbalistic mysteries were
33. Sefer ha-Gilgulim,p. 27. The Lurianic literature is replete with stories and references to Luria's experience of meriting the revelation of Elijah. See, for example, the referencesto Elijah in Sefer Toledot ha-Ari, Benayahu, index to the names of individuals, p. 379. Regarding revelations of Elijah experienced by earlier kabbalists, see G. Scholem, Reshit ha-Kabbalah(Jerusalem, 1948), pp. 66-98. Concerning the multifaceted role of Elijah in Jewish literature, see A. Wiener, The Prophet Elijah in the Development of Judaism (London, 1978). 34. Sefer ha-Gilgulim, p. 25a. 35. Ibid., p. 25b.

THE ART OF METOPOSCOPY

95

taught openly and publicly until the death of Rabbi Simeon bar Yobai of (Rashbi),to whom traditionascribesthe authorship the Zohar.Quoting the Zohar'sown words on this subject,Vital writesthat ever since Simeon bar Yohai'sdeath "wisdomhas departedfrom this earth"(Zohar 1, 217a). All of those sages who had borne kabbalisticwisdomsince that time have done so in great secrecy,each disclosinghis knowledgeto a single disciple. What is more, even to these select disciples,kabbalisticmasterstaught in only, revealingbut a portion of their knowledge.In such a generalizations and fragmentary kabbalisticwisdomwas passed from one way fragmented generationto the next until the time of Moses ben Nabman(Nabmanides), the greatSpanishrabbiof the thirteenth century.36 Followinga well-known traditionrecorded MenahemRecanati(ca. 1228-ca. 1290),Vitalinforms by us that duringthis time certainsages wereprivilegedto merit direct, personal revelationsfrom Elijahthe prophet,includingAbrahamben David of (1120-1191), and the latter'sson, Isaacthe Blind.Isaac,in turn, Posquieres his tradition on to his two disciples, Ezra and Azriel of Gerona. passed From them kabbalistictradition passed to the final teacher of genuine Kabbalah,Moses ben Nabman.37 What was Isaac Luria'splace in this process of transmission? Luria, to Vital, representsnothing less than the first and only appearaccording ance of authentickabbalistic knowledgesinceNabmanides.Even more,his be comparedonly to that of Rabbi Simeonbar Yobai himknowledgemay self. For this knowledgehas "been neitherseen nor heard in all the land since the days of Rabbi Simeon bar Yobai, may he rest in peace, until now."38Despite the aforementionedclaim that true Kabbalah had not manifesteditself since Nahmanides,Vital writes that in every generation God displays his compassion by giving Israel extraordinary individuals whom the Holy Spiritrested,and to whom Elijah, (yebideisegullah)"upon

36. Ibid. p. 37b. 37. In this connection, see M. Idel's study of Nabmanides' own view regarding what constitutes genuine and legitimate kabbalistic tradition, "We Have No Kabbalistic Tradition on This," in Rabbi Moses Nahmanides (Ramban): Explorations in His Religious and Literary Virtuosity, ed. I. Twersky (Cambridge, Mass., 1983), pp. 51-73. Concerning the question of divine revelations experienced by the earliest kabbalists of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, see A. J. Heschel, "Al Ruab ha-Kodesh be-Yemei ha-Beinayim," in Alexander Marx Jubilee Volume (New York, 1950), pp. 165-207, especially pp. 190-193; I. Twersky, Rabad of Posquibres: A Twelfth Century Talmudist (Cambridge, Mass., 1962), pp. 286-300. 38. Sefer ha-Gilgulim, p. 26a. Cf. Shivhei ha-Ari, p. 6.

96

LAWRENCE FINE

be revealed themin the himself, may his memory a blessing, instructing secrets Kabbalah." ourgeneration, hasnot withheld redeemer In of God a fromIsrael, us a saintly "thegreat oursaintly rabbi, teacher, sending angel, ourrabbi master, and IsaacLuria Ashkenazi, hisnamebe foranevermay filledlike a pomegranate [knowledge Scripture, with lastingblessing, of] and Ma'aseh Ma'asehBereshit, Mishnah,Talmud,Pilpul,Midrashim, Merkavah."All who witnessLuria's and 39 knowledge skills,and all who familiarize themselves his teachings recognize with will "thatthe human mind[byitself]couldnot attainsuchdeepandwondrous matters without thepower theHolySpirit, of mediated hismemory a be Elijah, through may 40 blessing." IsaacLuria, then,maybe saidto havebeenregarded hiscircleas an by individual of to possessing knowledge a charismatic thatis, asa person type, whomdirect exceptional and of had knowledge thesacred beenvouchsafed. Luria's his close relationship the sacred, evito was charisma, especially not denced onlyby his remarkable but saintliness, evenmoresignificantly, and whicharetypically skills,mysteries by his unusual knowledge esoteric the graspof ordinary human of beyond beings.41 Mastery the artof metoof couldonly havecome poscopy,the knowledge which,it was believed, fromon high,should understood oneaspect-albeita mostimportant be as whichhelped establish Luria a teacher as and one--of a typeof knowledge mentor unique of statusin Safed. religious Froman historical pointof view,this legitimization the Lurianic by of the charismatic modeof acquiring truthis, in my fellowship religious The effort to gain kabbalistic view, extremely significant. knowledge suchmeansstands,of course,in marked contrast traditional to through rabbinic methods developing of various teachings through typesof textual hermeneutical maybe brought bearupon to Whiledifferent inquiry. styles suchinquiry, commonfactoris the essentially the intellectual processof an existingtext for the purposeof clarifying, or studying interpreting,
39. Sefer ha-Gilgulim, p. 26a. 40. Ibid., p. 27a. It would be mistaken to conclude from this that Luria did not engage also in conventional textual study, of both exoteric and esoteric texts. Concerning this subject, see, for example, the traditions reported in Sha'ar ha-Mipvot, Parashat Ve-ethanan; SRH, pp. 34-46. Some of the relevant texts are translated in Fine, Safed Spirituality, pp. 68-70. 41. For a discussion of the notion of religious charisma as it is used here, see Charles F. Keyes, "Charisma: From Social Life to Sacred Biography," in Charismaand Sacred Biography, ed. M. Williams, Journal of the AmericanAcademy of Religion ThematicStudies 48, nos. 3 and 4 (1982): 1-22.

THE ART OF METOPOSCOPY

97

furtheringmeaning. For meaning is believed to reside within the texts themselves;one need only apply the appropriatetechniquesin order to ferretout the intentionof the text. This was the case not only for the rabbis of late antiquity; was true for the medievalphilosophers, it biblicalexegetes of various types, as well as most kabbalists. In Luria'scase appealwas not madeto the inherentmeaningof existing texts which could be discoveredthrough rational inquiry, but to some heavenly source. Knowledge,as we have seen, was regardedas deriving directly from on high, rather than from an individual'sown intellectual God's will. Whereas talmudicsageswentout of their the powerto determine way to deny the possibilityof furtherprophecy,claiminginstead that the the privilegeof understanding meaningof Torahwas now a more"earthly" the reasserted contentionthat more directchannelsof the one,42 Lurianists communicationwere not only possible, but urgentlypreferable. As we have alreadyseen, therewereearlierkabbalistswhom kabbalistic traditionregardedas havinggainedtheirknowledgein this way. But it was not until the fifteenthand sixteenthcenturiesthat we encounterthe proliferationof this type of activityon a large scale. The revelatorymaggidof the TurkishkabbalistJosephTaitaeak,the heavenlydisclosures experienced Moses Cordoveroand Solomon AlkabeZduringtheir walks amidst the by gravesitesof Safed,JosephKaro'smaggidicvisitations,andHayyimVital's techniqueof communingwith the soul of a departedtanna, are all vivid examples of the emergenceof a new point of view.43When Isaac Luria

42. See, for example, the often-cited text in the Babylonian Talmud, Bava Meria 59b. On the question of revelation and authority, see G. Scholem, "Religious Authority and Mysticism," in his On the Kabbalahand Its Symbolism, pp. 5-31; idem, The Messianic Idea in Judaism (New York, 1971), pp. 282-303. 43. Concerning the experiences of Joseph Taitaeak, see G. Scholem, "Ha-Maggid shel R. Yosef Taitaeak ve-ha-Giluyim ha-Meyubasim Lo," Sefunot 11 (1977): 69-112. On the revelations accorded Cordovero and AlkabeZ, see R. J. Z. Werblowsky, Joseph Karo, Lawyer and Mystic (Oxford, 1962), pp. 51-55, as well as Y. Liebes, Ha-Mashiah shel ha-Zohar-leDemuto ha-Meshihit shel R. Shimon bar Yohai (Jerusalem, 1982), pp. 107-109. On Karo, see Werblowsky, Joseph Karo, passim. Vital's technique is studied in L. Fine, "Mishnah as a Vehicle for Mystical Inspiration: A Contemplative Technique Taught by Hayyim Vital," Revue des etudesjuives 141 (1982): 183-199. In this connection, see L. Fine, "Maggidic Revelation in the Teachings of Isaac Luria," in Mystics, Philosophers,and Politicians, ed. J. Reinharz and D. Swetschinski (Durham, N.C., 1982), pp. 141-157. See also the study by M. Idel, "Iyyunim be-Shitat Ba'al Sefer ha-Meshiv," Sefunot, n.s. 2, no. 17 (1983): 185-266, in which he discusses this book's influence upon the development of the kind of revelatory techniques mentioned here. See, as well, the survey of such techniques in Werblowsky, Joseph Karo, pp. 38-83.

98

LAWRENCE FINE

arrivedin Safed from Egypt in the year 1570, then, he found himself in cultural surroundings which were highly supportiveof men who sought of Torahfromon high, and who weresuccessful those efforts. in knowledge Luria was not, however,merely another example of a general tendency. Rather,in Luriawe see a rich and full realizationof this tendency.Luria stood out in largepart becausehe was perceivedas a virtuosoat such activity, as one who was gifted beyond compare.Throughthe strengthof his impressive personality,as well as throughthe powerof his teachingsthemLuriawas well positionedto raise the phenomenonof charismatic selves, experienceto a status which it had not known for centuries.44

IV
Luria'scapacityto diagnosethe moral statusof his disciplesand others withinthe specific has throughthe artof metoposcopy also to be understood contextof the redemptive of whichhe and his circlebelievedthemprocess selves to be a part. The projectof redemption, towardwhich Isaac Luria's mythologicalteachingswere directedin their entirety,requiredeach of his for complextask of tikkun. disciplesto assumeresponsibility the extremely Tikkun refersto the elaborateactivityof mendingthe cosmicflaws brought of about by the intradivine ruptureknownas the "breaking the vessels,"as human sin. At its deepest levels this was to be accomplished well as by through the performanceof intricate contemplativeand theurgic rites, describedin such detail in the Lurianicliterature.But such rites, as mentioned earlier,could be practicedsuccessfully only by individualswho were thoroughlyworthy,that is, by those who had alreadyachieveda degreeof personaltikkun. Luria's expertiseat diagnosing sin and offeringprecise withwhichto purifythe soul was perceived his circle exercises penitential by as an essentialdemonstration Luria'sredemptive Luriawas indeeda of role. as "redeemer," Vitaltellsus, insofaras healingthe soul was an indispensable and stagein the largertask of messianicredemption, insofaras he imparted

44. One ought not to underestimate the influence which the personality of Isaac Luria exerted upon later mystical developments, particularly Sabbatianism and IHasidism,in significant part through the hagiographical works on Luria, Shivbei ha-Ari and Toledot ha-Ari. In this connection, see J. Dan, Ha-Sippur ha-Ivri be- Yemeiha-Beinayim (Jerusalem, 1974), chap. 11. This is a subject which deserves further investigation.

THE ART OF METOPOSCOPY

99

techniques of contemplation to those he deemed worthy to play a further and more advanced role in the process. For Isaac Luria and his followers believed that theirs was the final, messianic generation, and that the time was ripe for the increased disclosure of heavenly secrets. ... for this wisdom was concealedsince the days of Rashbi, may he rest in is peace,untilnow, as he [i.e., Rashbi]taught:"Permission not givento reveal it until the final generation,until the king Messiahcomes."Now is the time, for on accountof our saintlyteacher,our honoredmaster,RabbiIsaacLuria, may his memorybe a blessing, by means of the spirit of prophecywhich in withthe lightof divine appeared him, our eyes havebegunto be enlightened wisdom, hidden [until now] from the eyes of all living things.45 The connection between Simeon bar Yobai and Isaac Luria goes even deeper. Luria regarded himself as Simeon bar Yobai redivivus,and believed his closest disciples to be reincarnations of Rashbi's comrades!46While there is rich and diverse evidence attesting to this, one tradition is of particular relevance to our subject. According to this tradition-recorded in several places in slightly different versions47-Luria and his disciples journeyed to the same place where Rashbi and his fellowship had engaged in a dramatic study session, an event known in the Zohar as the Holy Idra ("threshing floor"). According to the Zohar, in the course of this event Rashbi and his disciples revealed recondite mysteries of the Torah.48 Luria is reported to have sat in the exact spot that Rashbi had occupied, and to have placed each of his disciples in the position of one of Simeon bar Yobai's comrades, revealing to each disciple the comrade with whose soul he was bound through the process of metempsychosis. Luria is also reported to have engaged in a ritual known as yihud ("unification") by lying stretched out upon Rashbi's grave, as a result of which Rashbi revealed to Luria "all that
45. SRH, pp. 39-40. 46. This has already been noted and briefly discussed by Y. Liebes in his important study, mentioned in n. 43, Ha-Mashiah shel ha-Zohar, pp. 109-110 and passim. 47. See Shivbei ha-Ari, p. 17; Sefer Toledot ha-Ari, Benayahu, pp. 179-180; Sefer haHlezyonot, p. 153. 48. The section of the Zohar entitled Idra Rabba is in Zohar 3, 287b-296b. For an English translation of these sections, see R. Rosenberg, The Anatomy of God (New York, 1973). The Idra Rabba is studied in the monograph by Liebes mentioned in the preceding note. In general, the Idra Rabba played an exceedingly important role in Isaac Luria's thinking.

100

FINE LAWRENCE

he had learned in the academy on high, just as a man speaks with his friend."49Accordingto one versionof this story,Luriaand his disciplesalso engaged in the study of the Idra itself, in the course of which Luria It revealedthe secret meaningof Simeon bar Yolai's Idra teachings.50 is clear fromthis that Isaac Luriaand his circlebelievedthat they were reenacting and furtheringthe redemptivework that had been carriedout by Rashbi and his fellowship. The mythological basis for this tradition lies in an intricate set of Lurianic teachings concerning the transmigrationof souls, particularly those of Luria'sown inner circle.5'For presentpurposesit is sufficientto chain which linked Joseph point out that Luria devised a transmigratory Rashbiand his and his brothers,RabbiAkivaand the other"TenMartyrs," and Luria'sfellowship. Eachgrouprepresented decisivestagein a comrades, the process of tikkun.Throughtheir efforts to bring about tikkunin the supernalrealm, the membersof these circlesoccupiedcriticalroles in the Moreover,each group galvanizedaround a central redemptiveprocess.52 who stood at the centerof these efforts.This processhad reacheda figure new and criticalstage with Isaac Luriaand his disciples;for they believed that theiractionswerecapable,at least potentially,of realizingthe redemption once and for all. The Safed kabbalistsappearto have thoughtthat the year 1575would sin witnessthe beginningof the messianicage. Accordingto the Lurianists, and exile had caused the exile of the inner secrets of the Torah; in the messianicage, however,these mysterieswould be revealedonce again.The redemptionof holiness, which lies at the heart of Lurianic mysticism, extendedeven to the redemption the Torahitself.Whereasnow only fragof
49. Shivhei ha-Ari, p. 17. 50. Sefer Toledot ha-Ari, pp. 179-180. 51. The subject of metempsychosis constitutes a major topic in Lurianic teachings, the primary accounts of which are Sha'ar ha-Gilgulim, Sefer ha-Gilgulim, and Sefer ha-ljezyonot, pt. 4. A survey of the history of metempsychosis in kabbalistic literature may be found in G. Scholem, Pirkei Yesod be-Havanat ha-Kabbalah u-Semaleha (Jerusalem, 1976), a German version of which is found in idem, Von der mystischen Gestalt der Gottheit (Zurich, 1962). A thorough study of the place of metempsychosis in Luria's mythology, and its relationship to his fellowship's self-understanding, is still needed. 52. See, for example, the account in Vital's Sefer ha-ljezyonot, pp. 210-229; Sefer haGilgulim(Vilna, 1886), chap. 35. Cf. Liebes, Ha-Mashiah shel ha-Zohar, p. 109, n. 95. Concerning the messianic roles of Luria (and Vital), see D. Tamar, "Ha-Ari ve-ha-Rabu ke-Mashiah ben Yosef," Sefunot 7 (1963): 167-177; Scholem, Sabbatai Sevi, pp. 52-58.

THE ART OF METOPOSCOPY

101

ments of the Torah'sdeep mysteriesare available,in the messianicfuture every Israelite will achieve knowledge of the Torah in its entirety. The stateby Luria-and to a lesser specialknowledgemeritedin the unredeemed his disciplesand others-was regardedas a sign of the coming degree by redemption.But it was far more than a mere signal.For this knowledge,a "knowledgeof the future and secret mysteriesof the Torah,"was also a means throughwhich Isaac Luria could facilitatethe task of tikkun. Indiana University Bloomington,Ind.