Lab Task 2
Lab Task 2
Table of Contents
Table of Contents...................................................................................................1 ABSTRACT..............................................................................................................2 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................2 2.1 E-commerce..................................................................................................3 2.2 Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs)................................................4 2.3 E-commerce Adoption by SMEs in Malaysia..................................................4 2.4 Inhibitors to e-commerce adoption..............................................................5 METHODOLOGY......................................................................................................8 4.1 Background of the Firms..............................................................................8 4.1.1 Types of Products......................................................................................9 4.1.2 Internet and E-commerce Usage of SMEs Interviewed............................10 4.2 Impediments to E-commerce Adoption......................................................10 4.2.1 Barriers to e-commerce...........................................................................12 4.2.1.1 Lack of External Infrastructure.............................................................12 4.2.1.2 Lack of Time.......................................................................................12 4.2.2 Reasons Why SMEs Lack the Inclination to Adopt E-commerce...............13 4.2.2.1 Concern about Security of E-commerce..............................................13 4.2.2.2 Trusting E-commerce ...........................................................................14 4.2.2.3 High Cost.............................................................................................14 4.2.2.4 Customer-related Constraints..............................................................14 4.2.2.5 Inadequate Support from Government and E-commerce Consultants..15 4.2.2.6 Unclear Benefits of E-commerce..........................................................15 4.2.2.7 Not Interested and Not Relevant.........................................................16 DISCUSSION......................................................................................................... 16 CONCLUDING REMARKS.......................................................................................17 REFERENCES........................................................................................................17
Page | 1
As of June 2004, KLSE has officially changed its name to Bursa Malaysia.
Page | 5
Page | 6
Chau (2001)
EDI
Postal questionnaire
resources Product not well Lack of knowledge suited Unsatisfactory internal ICT support Non-positive attitude Insignificant influence Poor
IS Ecommerce
promotion campaign Managerial time Lack of ICT knowledge Unfamiliar with the Internet Fear of the Internet
Drew (2003)
Ecommerce
Telephone interviews
2 UK SMEs
Ecommerce
Case studies
Table 1 summarises 6 studies of ICT adoption by SMEs. Among the inhibitors are lack of knowledge (Chau, 2001; Drew, 2003; Scupola, 2003; Simpson and Docherty, 2004), lack of resources (Auger and Gallaugher, 1997; Drew, 2003) and feat of the Internet (Scupola, 2003). The sample sizes of SMEs that have been used in these studies range from 2 to 462. Data gathering methods are mainly postal questionnaires, and semi-structured interviews. Studies using large sample sizes and combining semi-structured interviews with postal questionnaires are rare in the literature.
Page | 7
Page | 8
As illustrated in Table 2, the firms are involved in a variety of products and services, and it is difficult to classify their activities into discrete categories. Three firms (A, C and D) were involved in food and beverage production. Three firms (M, N and P) were principally involved in IT services. Two firms (B and L) produced agricultural products. One firm (Q) produced health and food supplements. The remaining firms manufactured finished products and some (firms G and S) were subsidiaries of large organisations.
Page | 9
A B C D E F G H S J K L M N O P Q R
Note: Yes*: SMEs with simple websites with simple information about the firm and its products 4.2 Impediments to E-commerce Adoption The interviews revealed some evidence why some SMEs did not adopt or use or stop using ecommerce. The analysis provides a detailed evaluation of problems encountered and is divided into a few thematic. The findings from the interviews show that there are two principal reasons why SME managers did not adopt or use or stop using e-commerce. First, some interviewees suffer from constraints to adopt e-commerce. Second, some of them are not inclined to adopt e-commerce due to several reasons. Table 4 displays the summary of the findings. Page | 10
Firm
Lack of time
22% 3 44% 2
50% 2 3
Lack of external 2 infrastructure Technolog y infrastruct ure Basic infrastructure such as transportation and delivery Lack of IT expertise and financial resources Concern about security Lack of trust of ecommerce High cost N/A
36% N/A 5 56% 1 8 57% N/A 8 89% 7 78% N/A 5 N/A 56% 3 10 9 64% N/A 9 4 2 11 79% 86% 3 4 1 11 71% 1 1 1
CustomerN/A related constraints Inadequate N/A support from government and ecommerce consultants Lack benefits of N/A ecommerce
Table 4 displays ten inhibitors of why SMEs in this study did not adopt e-commerce. Three of them are the constraints the SME faced to adopt e-commerce while the other seven are Page | 11
Page | 13
Page | 18