Description: Tags: Green-2
Description: Tags: Green-2
Description: Tags: Green-2
Chapter 2
What Works: Components of
Exemplary After-School Programs
Risk can be transformed into opportunity for our youth
by turning their nonschool hours into the time of their lives.
—A Matter of Time
Carnegie Corporation
December 1992
Quality after-school programs can provide enforcement; and supervised recreation and
safe, engaging environments that motivate athletic programs and events.
and inspire learning outside of the regular
school day. While there is no one single However, many programs allow children to
formula for success in after-school spend far too much time in passive activities
programs, both practitioners and researchers such as television or video viewing. One
have found that effective programs combine reason for poor-quality after-school
academic, enrichment, cultural, and activities may be inadequate facilities. Most
recreational activities to guide learning and after-school programs do not have the use of
engage children and youth in wholesome a library, computers, museum, art room,
activities. They also find that the best music room, or game room on a weekly
programs develop activities to meet the basis. Too many programs do not have
particular needs of the communities they access to a playground or park.1 Other
serve. reasons for poor-quality after-school
programs include large ratios of children to
The types of activities found in a quality staff, inadequately trained staff, and high
after-school program include tutoring and turnover due to poor wages and
supplementing instruction in basic skills, compensation.2
such as reading, math, and science; drug-
and violence-prevention curricula and Looking at the big picture of after-school
counseling; youth leadership activities (e.g., programs—those in schools, those run in the
Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, academic clubs); facilities of community-based organizations,
volunteer and community service or those found in houses of faith—
opportunities; college awareness and researchers have identified some common
preparation; homework assistance centers; characteristics necessary to developing high-
courses and enrichment in the arts and quality programs that meet the needs of a
culture; computer instruction; language diverse population of school-age children.3
instruction, including English as a second
language; employment preparation or
training; mentoring; activities linked to law
Tending to transportation
In addition to addressing scheduling and
cost issues, programs can help meet family
needs by providing transportation to and
from the before- and after-school programs.
While transportation is a major cost for an
after-school program, it is a critical safety
and logistical concern for families.
Evaluation of Program
Progress and Effectiveness
2
Robert Halpern, After-School Programs for Low-Income Children: Promise and Challenges, The Future of
Children, When School Is Out, vol 9 no: 2, (David and Lucile Packard Foundation, Fall 1999).
3
Carnegie Council, 1994; Fashola, 1998; Janie Funkhouser et al., Extending Learning Time for Disadvantaged
Students (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, 1995); National Institute on Out-of-School Time, Making
the Case, Presented at Regional Technical Assistance Workshops for the 21st-Century Community Learning Centers
Program, Spring 1998; Janette Roman, ed., The NSACA Standards for Quality School-Age Care (Boston, MA: National
School-Age Care Alliance, 1998); Elizabeth Riesner and Janie Funkhouser, Designing Effective After-School Programs
(Washington, DC: Policy Studies Associates, 1998); de Kanter et al., 1997; Vandell, 1997; White House Child Care
Conference, 1997.
4
This chapter contains a number of examples. Following are citations for these examples: Ankeny, Iowa,
Community Schools Community Education Department (515-965-9606); KOALA, Boston, Massachusetts (Laura Gang,
508-941-0300); Cason Lane Academy, Murfreesboro, Tennessee (Jeanne Brothers, 615-898-7245); Police Athletic
League, Baltimore, Maryland (Rita Chappelle, 410-396-2166); Before and After School Explorers (B.A.S.E.)
Enrichment Workshop for Children, Lansdale, Pennsylvania (Nancy Schall, 215-368-1288); Chicago YouthNet Program,
Chicago, Illinois (Kharl Walker, 773-536-2926); Master Program, Montgomery, Texas (Wendy Zunker, 409-597-6494);
Bridger Eighth Grade Center, Independence, Missouri (Principal Grover Gelven, 816-796-4800); FOUNDATIONS, Inc.
(856-727-8000); P.S. 5, Washington Heights, New York (Pete Moses, Children's Aid Society, 212-949-4921); St. Ann's
Catholic Outreach Center, Kingstree, South Carolina (Terry Russell, Save the Children, 203-221-4084); Sano y Salvo,
Tucson, Arizona (Barbara Benton, 520-617-7434); 21st-Century Community Learning Center, Seneca, Missouri
(Tammy Gripka, 417-776-3690); The After-School Corporation, New York, New York (Lucy Friedman, 212-547-6950);
Boston 2-6 After School Project, Boston, Massachusetts (Jennifer Davis: 617-635-2098); 21stCCLC LEADERS
program, Watauga County Schools (Bricca Sweet, 828-264-7190); LA’s BEST, Los Angeles, California (Carla Sanger,
213-847-3681); Beacon Schools, New York, New York (Jennie Soler-McIntosh, 212-676-8255); ARK, 21stCCLC
programs in McCormick, South Carolina (Wally Hall: 864-465-0060).
5
Deborah Lowe Vandell, “After-School Programs Vary in Quality.” Wisconsin Center for Education Research
Highlights 7, no. 2 (Summer 1995).
6
Ibid.
7
Roman, 1998.
8
de Kanter et al., 1997.
9
National Association of Elementary School Principals, After-School Programs and the K-8 Principal
(Alexandria, VA: Authors, 1999).
10
Fox and Newman, 1998.
11
Funkhouser et al., 1995.
12
An-Me Chung, Adriana de Kanter, Marianne Kugler, “Measuring and Evaluating Child and Program
Outcomes,” School-Age Review, NSACA, in press.