A Fault Diagnosis Method For Substation Grounding Grid Based On The Square-Wave Frequency Domain Model
A Fault Diagnosis Method For Substation Grounding Grid Based On The Square-Wave Frequency Domain Model
A Fault Diagnosis Method For Substation Grounding Grid Based On The Square-Wave Frequency Domain Model
A FAULT DIAGNOSIS METHOD FOR SUBSTATION GROUNDING GRID BASED ON THE SQUARE-WAVE FREQUENCY DOMAIN MODEL Peng-He Zhang1), Jun-Jia He1), Dan-Dan Zhang1), Lan-Min Wu2)
1) College of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China ( [email protected],+86 13871123500) 2) Shan Xi Province Electrical Power Company, Taiyuan 03000, ShanXi Province ([email protected])
Abstract Current methods of fault diagnosis for the grounding grid using DC or AC are limited in accuracy and cannot be used to identify the locations of the faults. In this study, a new method of fault diagnosis for substation grounding grids is proposed using a square-wave. A frequency model of the grounding system is constructed by analyzing the frequency characteristics of the soil and the grounding conductors into which two different frequency square-wave sources are injected. By analyzing and comparing the corresponding information of the surface potentials of the output signals, the faults of the grounding grid can be diagnosed and located. Our method is verified by software simulation, scale model experiments and field experiments. Keywords: square-wave, frequency characteristics, grounding grid, fault diagnosis.
2012 Polish Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved
1. Introduction Grounding is the most important approach to guaranteeing the safety of a power system. But it is hard to monitor the state of a grounding grid, as it is usually buried under earth. Grid faults are also very likely to take place due to the corrosion of the earth electrodes. Some studies put forward the port nodal resistance (or voltage) method [1, 2] and the simple surface potentials method to diagnose a grid fault [3, 4] based on a time-domain characteristic analysis. The accuracy of such approaches is unsatisfactory because the change in port nodal resistance or voltage is too small. Grcev and Dawalibi [5] built a model of the simple frequency characteristic of the grounding grid. Others have studied the frequency model of the grounding grid according to the complex image method [6-8]. Based on the frequency model, some diagnosed the broken location of a grounding grid by measuring the magnetic field on the ground [9, 10]. This approach has demonstrated improvement in accuracy in fault diagnosis; but during the process of measurement, due to the inevitable interference from the metal equipment and electromagnetic field, it is difficult to locate the fault of the grounding grid. The diagnostic method based on the frequency domain has been used extensively in various fields, e.g. the transient electromagnetic method to detect the fault of a buried metal pipe [11], the electrochemical impedance spectrum method to monitor the corrosion of reinforced concrete [12], the earth electromagnetic method of geophysics to search for metal ore [13], the square-wave method of double frequencies to detect metal [14], etc. In this paper, a fault diagnosis method for the grounding system is proposed based on the frequency domain. Through analyzing the different frequency characteristics of metal and soil, the diagnostic method of square-wave frequency domain is presented. This method is
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Article history: received on Dec. 20, 2010; received in revised form on Sept. 2, 2011; accepted on Jan. 17, 2012; available online on March 12, 2012.
63
Peng-He Zhang, Jun-Jia He, et al.: A FAULT DIAGNOSIS METHOD FOR SUBSTATION GROUNDING GRID
verified by conducting software simulation, scale model experiments and field experiments. The results demonstrate that this method can be used to successfully diagnose a fault of the grounding grid and identify the fault location. 2. Frequency domain characteristic of a grounding system 2.1. Frequency domain model of a grounding grid The buried depth of a grounding grid is generally no more than 5 m; even in an area of high resistivity, the depth of vertical grounding conductors laid by the blast of a deep well is less than 80 m. According to the wave physics equation, the wave propagation speed is directly proportional to the wavelength and frequency:
v = f ,
(1)
where: v is the wave propagation speed (determined by the dielectric constant and permeability), m/s; f is the frequency (determined by power), Hz; is the wavelength, m. When the frequency of the electromagnetic wave is less than 100 kHz, 2000 m ~3000 m. Therefore, the frequency domain model of grounding system can be built without considering the electromagnetic wave process. The frequency model of the grounding grid is established based on an integrated approach that combines Green's function of electric field and Kirchhoff current law of the circuit theory. It is assumed that there are n branches and m nodes in the grounding grid. For the square model, current is injected into the grounding grid, as shown in Fig. 1, where c is the end node of a conductor, d is the central node of a conductor.
2c z12 1d I1 z22 z41 z11 1c I0
I4
2d
4d
z23
I2
z44
3c
I3 z33 3d z34 4c
Current dissipates into the ground while flowing along the conductors. Suppose the leakage current of the conductor flows into the ground from the central node of the conductor and the axial impedance is twice as high as the terminal impedance. The current dissipation would result in a voltage variation on the surface of all the conductors. In accordance with the Kirchhoff current law, the voltage equation for terminal nodes and central nodes would be:
B + R 1 C d 0 = , T E c I 0 C
(2)
where d = [1d ,2d ,L,nd ]T , id is the central potential of conductor i (i = 1n); R is an n n matrix, i.e. the own impedance and the mutual impedance to ground; B is a
64
diagonal nonzero matrix, i.e. the own admittance of the central node of the conductor; C is a symmetric matrix, i.e. the mutual admittance between the central node and the terminal node for which the corresponding matrix element is zero if the nodes are connected; E is an m m matrix, i.e. the own impedance of the terminal nodes of the conductor; c = [1c , 2c , L , nc ]T ,
ic is
the
potential
T
of
node
i ;
I 0 = [ I 0 ,0, L ,0]T is
the
injection
current.
Suppose I = [ I1 , I 2 , L , I n ] , I i is the leakage current of the conductor i . According to Green's function of the point current source, the relationship between the leakage current and the central potential can be expressed as follows: I = R 1 d , (3)
Therefore, all the leakage currents of the central nodes can be obtained. Suppose the coordinates of an arbitrary location Q on the surface are (x, y, z), the surface potential of Q can be obtained by adding the potentials of all the leakage currents to Q.
Z=
1 a
f , 2
(4)
where: is the permeability of soil, a and are the radius and the resistivity respectively, f is the frequency. In the grounding grid, the axial current is observed flowing along grounding conductors and producing the mutual inductance between grounding conductors [15]. In order to simplify the calculation, grounding conductors are divided into micro sections of equal length. Assuming that each micro section is a linear current source, the formula for mutual inductive resistances is as follows: 2l M = l (ln 1) f (5) d
where: l is length of the conductor, d is the distance between a couple of conductors, f is the frequency, is the soil resistivity.
Peng-He Zhang, Jun-Jia He, et al.: A FAULT DIAGNOSIS METHOD FOR SUBSTATION GROUNDING GRID
1 (6) )] , 1 2f where: 0 is the resistivity for DC; is the polarizable ratio, i.e., = U1 - U 2U1 , U1 is the primary voltage, U 2 is the secondary voltage; f is the frequency ; is the time constant. Even when the frequency of the injection current is very low, the soil resistivity decreases with the increase of the injection current frequency. Environment conditions are set as follows: temperature 26C, humidity 70%. A LCR4310 digital bridge produced by Wayne Kerr is used to test the frequency characteristic of clay soil(the material commonly found on the sites of substations), sand and water. It is found that the resistivity of soil and water gradually decreases with increasing frequency, as shown in Table 1.
( f ) = 0 [1 (1
Table 1. Frequency characteristic of the mediums resistivity. NUMBER Frequency[Hz] Water resistivity[ m ] Clay soil resistivity[ m ] Sand resistivity[ m ] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
66
According to the frequency domain model of the grounding system, the surface potential caused by a square-wave of arbitrary frequency, which is injected into the grounding grid, can be calculated through Fourier inversion. Four fault cases are simulated and analyzed. As shown in Fig. 3, for example, the injection current is 3A, and the fault is placed between observation points 10 and 11, the surface potential differences are calculated.
Peng-He Zhang, Jun-Jia He, et al.: A FAULT DIAGNOSIS METHOD FOR SUBSTATION GROUNDING GRID
The surface potential of the observation point 10 ascends first and then descends along with the increase of frequency whereas that of the observation point 11 descends first and then ascends. Since the curves of observation points 10 and 11 deviate significantly from the other observation points, it may be inferred that the fault is located between observation points 10 and 11.
1.2
1.0
0.8
observation line1 observation line2 observation line3 observation line4 observation line5 observation line6 observation line7
0.6
0.4
0.2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Fig. 4 shows that the largest differences of surface potential are observed between observation points 2 and 4 on the observation line 7, which is the location of the fault. The experimental results show that the fault can be detected and the location of the fault can be identified.
68
Three experimental schemes have been designed to simulate the two faults through the combination of opening or closing switches: Scheme I: All 5 conductors (conductors 1 to 5) connect to the main grid according to the dotted line shown in Fig. 5. Scheme II: All 5 conductors except conductor 3 connect to the main grid. Scheme III: only conductors 1, 2 and 5 connect to the main grid. Because the area of the grounding grid is usually large, the power of the current sources injected into the grounding grid would be much larger. Since it is difficult to manufacture such a large current source of varying frequencies, two current sources are injected into the grounding grid. If the frequency is too low, it would be interfered by the ground current largely; on the contrary, if the frequency is too high, it would be interfered by the electromagnetic coupling between the power supply and the measurement circuit. Therefore, 50 Hz AC and 3 kHz square-wave are selected. They are injected into the grounding grid according to the three schemes respectively. In order to avoid on-site interference of the power frequency of 50Hz AC, the mean value of surface potentials produced by a 55 Hz AC current and a 45 Hz AC current has been used as the surface potential of a 50 Hz AC current. The backflow point of current is selected 100 meters far from the lab. The surface potentials observed are shown in Fig. 6.
69
Peng-He Zhang, Jun-Jia He, et al.: A FAULT DIAGNOSIS METHOD FOR SUBSTATION GROUNDING GRID
1200
1100
1000
900
800
700
600 0 2 4 6 8 10
observed spots
In Fig. 6, the surface potential differences of points 5 and 6 above conductor 3 in Scheme II are evidently smaller than the differences above other conductors, because conductor 3 is not connected to the main grounding grid in Scheme II. It is similar in Scheme III that the differences of points from 5 to 8 above conductors 3 and 4 in Scheme III are obviously smaller than the surface potential difference above other conductors, because conductors 3 and 4 are not connected to the main grounding grid in Scheme III. The results suggest that the grid fault can be correctly diagnosed using a square-wave of different frequencies. It is also reasonable to suggest that our method can be applied to diagnose and locate faults in real substations. Although the grounding grid of the real substations is more complicated, its environmental condition and the geological condition are similar. When the local corrosion causes a fault, the length of corrupted grounding conductors is usually of a few meters. Therefore, if the injection current is fixed, the surface potential in fault location is reduced. Therefore, by monitoring the changes of surface potential, faults in the grounding grid can be diagnosed and located. Potential-measuring electrodes are usually arranged with definite interval order (for example, 10 m) inside the substation, according to the buried direction of horizontal grounding conductors. After measuring and recording the surface potential of each point, the data mining algorithm may be applied to find the special points which indicate whether the substation grounding grid is corroded or not, and the corrosive position if it had been corroded.
5. Conclusions
In this study, a frequency model of the grounding system is presented by analyzing the frequency characteristics of the soil and the grounding conductors. A fault diagnostic method of the grounding grid using a square-wave is proposed based on the frequency model of the grounding system. The faults of the grounding grid are detected and located by analyzing and comparing the surface potentials of different frequency. Software simulation of the substation grounding grid, scale model experiments of small dimension and field experiments of complicated structure are conducted to verify the method. The results suggest that the method can be used to diagnose faults effectively and locate them accurately without excavating the grounding grids.
Acknowledgement
Mr. Ho Simon Wang at HUST Academic Writing Centre has helped improve the presentation of the manuscript.
70
References
[1] [2] Zhang, Xiuli, Luo, Ping, Mo, Ni. (2008). Development and application of electrochemical detection system for grounding grid corrosion state. Proceedings of the CSEE, 28(19), 152-156. Liu, Jian, Wang, Jianxin, Cheng, Hongli. (2006). Data mining in grounding grid corrosion detection to ensure safety of electric power systems. Proceedings of the 2006 International Symposium on Safety Science and Technology, Changsha, China, 472-478. Rong, Zeng, Jinliang, He, Jun, Hu. (2002). The theory and implementation of corrosion diagnosis for grounding system. International Conference on Power System Technology, Pittsburgh, USA, 1120-1126. Wilen, T. (2003). Electrical grounding systems & testing. Michigan Tech., 11, 1-20 Grcev, L, Dawalibi, F. (1990). An electromagnetic model for transients in grounding systems. IEEE Transaction on Power Delivery, 5(4), 1773-1781. Tsuchida, T., Tsuneoka, M., Ohkawa, Y., et al. (2008). Basic study of high-frequency impedance characteristics of ground system. IEEE Trans on Industry Applications, 128(11), 1239-1246. Cidras, J., Tero, A.F., Carrido, C. (2000). Nodal frequency analysis of grounding systems considering the soil ionization effect. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 15(1), 1083-1091. Wlater, J.M. (2006). Ground resistivity influence on the lighting over-voltage level in high voltage power substation [C]. XVI international conference on electromagnetic disturbances, Kaunas. Liu, Yang, Cui, Xiang, Zhao, Zhibin. (2008). Design and application of exciting power for substation grounding grids testing system based on impedance transformation technology. Proceedings of the CSEE, 28(28), 18-23. Hsu, Ting-Yu, Loh. (2009). Damage detection using frequency response functions under ground excitation. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, 7292(1), 65-71. Jordan, J., Gasulla, M., Pallas-Areny, R. (2001). Electrical resistance tomography to detect leaks from buried pipes. Measurement Science and Technology, 12, 1061-1070. Ksiazek, M. (2011). The experimental and innovative research on usability of sulphur polymer composite for corrosion protection of reinforcing steel and concrete. Composites Part B: Engineering, 42(5), 1084-1096. Donze, T. (2006). Electromagnetic survey defines reservoir, prevents drilling poor prospect. World Oil, 224(5), 85-87. Rosendo, V.B., Harneit, S., Reuter, M. (2006). Moisture effects in soils using a frequency domain metal detector. 2006 World Automation Congress, 6, 21-26. Lee Kyeong-Hwan, Zhang Naiqian, Kuhn William B, et al. (2007). A frequency-response permittivity sensor for simultaneous measurement of multiple soil properties: Part I. The frequency-response method. Transactions of the ASABE, 50(6): 2315-2326. Huang, Wenwu, Wen, Xishan, Xie, Jun. (2005). Simulation of the current distribution along axial direction of the grounding network. High Voltage Engineering, 31(6), 76-78.
[16]
71