0% found this document useful (0 votes)
147 views1 page

Cost A PDF

The document discusses a case study involving an employee named Joe who is asked by his supervisor Mary to write a positive report about a system's performance despite knowing the actual performance is worse than reported. Joe must decide whether to obey Mary and provide a false report or be honest in his report to the CEO. The case explores the ethical issues and alternatives from utilitarian, rights, and justice perspectives.

Uploaded by

prabu06051984
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
147 views1 page

Cost A PDF

The document discusses a case study involving an employee named Joe who is asked by his supervisor Mary to write a positive report about a system's performance despite knowing the actual performance is worse than reported. Joe must decide whether to obey Mary and provide a false report or be honest in his report to the CEO. The case explores the ethical issues and alternatives from utilitarian, rights, and justice perspectives.

Uploaded by

prabu06051984
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

FINANCE MINICASE: MGMT - 09 TEACHING NOTES

BUSINESS ETHICS PROGRAM

Cost Justified? Teaching Notes


What Are the Relevant Facts? 1. 2. 3. The CEO has received an anonymous letter stating that the system does not perform as expected. This system represents a investment by the company. major financial What Are the Ethics of the Alternatives? Ask questions based on a utilitarian perspective (costs and benefits). For example: 1. 2. Which of the alternatives would provide the greatest benefit to the greatest number? What are the costs in each of the alternatives? Which of the alternatives has the highest cost factor associated with it? Do the benefits of honesty at all costs outweigh the benefits of obeying the directive of a supervisor?

Mary was the original supporter of the system and provides the CEO with only positive feedback on its performance. Joe is aware that the systems actual performance is as described in the letter. Mary tells Joe to write a positive reply to the letter for the CEO. When Joe approaches Mary with his concerns, she says if he does not write the reply, she will have doubts about his ability to be a District Manager.

4. 5. 6.

3.

Ask questions based on a rights perspective. For example: 1. 2. What does the stakeholder have the right to expect? Which of the alternatives would you want if you were Joe? Mary? John? The stockholders?

What Are the Ethical Issues? 1. 2. 3. How can Joe provide an accurate report on the systems performance? Is Joes duty to obey Mary or to tell the truth to the CEO? To what extent is Joe responsible for informing others of the situation? Is this a whistle-blowing situation? What are Joes obligations to his family?

Ask questions based on a justice perspective (benefits and burdens). For example: 1. 2. Which alternative distributes the benefits and burdens most fairly among the stakeholders? Which stakeholders are most affected if Joe replies honestly?

4.

What Are the Practical Constraints? Who Are the Primary Stakeholders? Joe Mary John The individual who wrote the letter The companys stockholders Joes family 1. All correspondence must go through proper channels. Company management frowns on level-jumping. What will happen if Joe replies honestly?

2.

What Actions Should Be Taken? 1. What should Joe do? Which alternative would you choose if you were in his position? Why? Which ethical theories (utilitarian, rights, justice) make the most sense to you in this situation?

What Are the Possible Alternatives? 1. 2. 3. Provide the reply as Mary requested. Provide an accurate reply (which Mary would intercept and stop). Refuse to write a false report.

2. 3.

1992 Arthur Andersen & Co, SC. All rights reserved.

Page 1 of 1

You might also like