Federal Student Aid Financial Management System

(FSA FMS)
Exhibit 300: Part I: Summary Information and Justification (All
Capital Assets)

Overview

Date of Submission:
Agency: Department of Education
Bureau: Federal Student Aid
Name of this Capital Asset: Federal Student Aid Financial
Management System (FSA FMS)
Unique Project (Investment) 018-45-01-01-01-1060-00
Identifier: (For IT investment
only, see section 53. For all other,
use agency ID system.)
What kind of investment will this Mixed Life Cycle
be in FY2008? (Please NOTE:
Investments moving to O&M ONLY
in FY2008, with
Planning/Acquisition activities
prior to FY2008 should not select
O&M. These investments should
indicate their current status.)
What was the first budget year FY2001 or earlier
this investment was submitted to
OMB?
Provide a brief summary and justification for this investment,
including a brief description of how this closes in part or in
whole an identified agency performance gap:
Utilizing Oracle Federal Financials, FMS is the single point of financial
information by institution, integrating transactions both from the FSA
feeder systems as well as from the Grants Administration and Payment
System (GAPS). Accordingly, FMS provides consolidated data to support
key management analysis and is the only source within the Department
of Education to obtain a comprehensive financial picture of an
institution across all FSA programs. FMS consolidates and manages all
FSA program transactions from FSA's feeder systems (e.g., FFEL, Direct
Loan, Pell, LEAP/SLEAP, and Campus-based transactions). The feeders
interface functional transactions to FMS where they are translated to
the appropriate accounting. It facilitates reconciliation and internal
program management and reporting, and large volumes of payment
processing. FMS tracks and manages the payment processing for direct
loan originations and consolidations by GAPS and processes refunds to
borrowers for overpaid loans. Through highly customized extensions,
tightly integrated with the Oracle sub-ledgers, FMS processes large
volumes of payments to the lender and guarantee agency communities.
It receives electronic invoices and advice of fees payable to Education,
performs complex custom validations and reasonability checks to
minimize erroneous payments, and processes the transactions through
Oracle sub-ledgers to generate Treasury payment files and accounting
transactions. The accounting transactions are, in turn, summarized and
sent to the FMSS core financial management system for external
financial reporting. FMS serves a mission-critical function as a FFEL
program front-end payment system, for reconciliation to the FSA feeder
systems, for more detailed internal program management reporting,
and for additional levels of system controls. However, FMS does not
fulfill the central functions of a JFMIP core financial management
systems. FMSS, not FMS, produces all external financial reports, such
as the financial statements, FACTS I and FACTS II, and the SF224. In
addition, FMSS serves as the source for all budget funding transactions
(appropriation, apportionment, and allotment data), establishing the
budget authority for the Department's financial management systems.
Did the Agency's Yes
Executive/Investment Committee
approve this request?
a. If "yes," what was the date of
this approval?
Did the Project Manager review Yes
this Exhibit?
Has the agency developed and/or No
promoted cost effective, energy
efficient and environmentally
sustainable techniques or
practices for this project.
a. Will this investment include No
electronic assets (including
computers)?
b. Is this investment for new No
construction or major retrofit of a
Federal building or facility?
(answer applicable to non-IT
assets only)
 1. If "yes," is an ESPC or UESC
being used to help fund this
investment?
2. If "yes," will this
investment meet sustainable
design principles?
3. If "yes," is it designed to be
30% more energy efficient than
relevant code?
Does this investment support one Yes
of the PMA initiatives?
If "yes," check all that apply: Financial Performance,
Expanded E-Government
a. Briefly describe how this FMS facilitates the payment
asset directly supports the processing for all FSA programs.
identified initiative(s)? The Form 2000 and the Lenders
Reporting systems have
replaced paper driven
processes. Both the Guaranty
Agency and Lender/Servicer
communities now submit their
reports/payment request
electronically thus eliminating all
paper processes. Form 2000
was awarded the e-Gov award
for best in business practice.
These initiatives also support
the President's Management
Agenda (PMA) by reducing
cumbersome business processes
and reducing cost.
Does this investment support a No
program assessed using the
Program Assessment Rating Tool
(PART)? (For more information
about the PART, visit
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/part.)
a. If "yes," does this investment No
address a weakness found during
the PART review?
b. If "yes," what is the name of
the PART program assessed by
OMB's Program Assessment
Rating Tool?
c. If "yes," what PART rating did
it receive?
Is this investment for information Yes
technology?
If the answer to Question: "Is this investment for information
technology?" was "Yes," complete this sub-section. If the
answer is "No," do not answer this sub-section.
For information technology investments only:
What is the level of the IT Level 2
Project? (per CIO Council PM
Guidance)
What project management (1) Project manager has been
qualifications does the Project validated as qualified for this
Manager have? (per CIO Council investment
PM Guidance):
Is this investment identified as No
"high risk" on the Q4 - FY 2006
agency high risk report (per
OMB's "high risk" memo)?
Is this a financial management Yes
system?
a. If "yes," does this investment Yes
address a FFMIA compliance area?
1. If "yes," which compliance Compliance with all three:
area: Federal accounting standards,
USSGL at transaction level, and
JFMIP requirements
2. If "no," what does it
address?
b. If "yes," please identify the system name(s) and system
acronym(s) as reported in the most recent financial systems
inventory update required by Circular A-11 section 52
Federal Student Aid Financial Management System (FSA FMS)
What is the percentage breakout for the total FY2008 funding
request for the following? (This should total 100%)
Hardware 0
Software 35.000000
Services 65.000000
 Other
If this project produces Yes
information dissemination
products for the public, are these
products published to the Internet
in conformance with OMB
Memorandum 05-04 and included
in your agency inventory,
schedules and priorities?
Are the records produced by this Yes
investment appropriately
scheduled with the National
Archives and Records
Administration's approval?

Summary of Funding

Provide the total estimated life-cycle cost for this investment by

completing the following table. All amounts represent budget
authority in millions, and are rounded to three decimal places.
Federal personnel costs should be included only in the row
designated "Government FTE Cost," and should be excluded
from the amounts shown for "Planning," "Full Acquisition," and
"Operation/Maintenance." The total estimated annual cost of
the investment is the sum of costs for "Planning," "Full
Acquisition," and "Operation/Maintenance." For Federal
buildings and facilities, life-cycle costs should include long term
energy, environmental, decommissioning, and/or restoration
costs. The costs associated with the entire life-cycle of the
investment should be included in this report.
Table 1: SUMMARY OF SPENDING FOR PROJECT PHASES
(REPORTED IN MILLIONS)
(Estimates for BY+1 and beyond are for planning purposes
only and do not represent budget decisions)
PY - 1 BY + BY + BY + BY + 4
PY CY BY
and 1 2 3 and Total
2006 2007 2008
Earlier 2009 2010 2011 Beyond
Planning
Budgetary 0 0 0 0
Resources
Acquisition
 Budgetary 3.919 3 4.5 2
Resources
Subtotal Planning & Acquisition
Budgetary 3.919 3 4.5 2
Resources
Operations & Maintenance
Budgetary 34.995 7.665 4.447 5.318
Resources
TOTAL
Budgetary 38.914 10.665 8.947 7.318
Resources
Government FTE Costs
Budgetary 3.655 0.997 1.395 1.395
Resources
Number of 20.0 7.5 10.5 10.5 10.5
FTE
represented
by Costs:
Note: For the cross-agency investments, this table should
include all funding (both managing partner and partner
agencies). Government FTE Costs should not be included as part
of the TOTAL represented.

2. Will this project require the No

agency to hire additional FTE's?
a. If "yes," How many and in
what year?
3. If the summary of spending has changed from the FY2007
President's budget request, briefly explain those changes:
The summary of spending has changed from the FY2007 President's
budget request. Below are the two changes, with explanations: FY2007
Total Budgetary Resources increased from $6.687 million to $8.947
million. The $2.260m increase is the result of $2.250 million in
additional development enhancements that include CSB Phase 2 -
Releases 2&3, Form 2000 and LaRS enhancements, other internal
controls & performance improvements. The remaining $.010m is the
result of an under estimation of the Oracle license renewal costs.
FY2008 Total Budgetary Resources increased from $4.740 million to
$7.317 million. The $2.577m increase is the result of the expiration of
the last pre-priced contract option year, the anticipated increase in the
labor rate for skilled Oracle financials contractors, the possible
 transition to a new vendor, and likely development activity.

Performance Information

In order to successfully address this area of the exhibit 300,

performance goals must be provided for the agency and be
linked to the annual performance plan. The investment must
discuss the agency's mission and strategic goals, and
performance measures must be provided. These goals need to
map to the gap in the agency's strategic goals and objectives
this investment is designed to fill. They are the internal and
external performance benefits this investment is expected to
deliver to the agency (e.g., improve efficiency by 60 percent,
increase citizen participation by 300 percent a year to achieve
an overall citizen participation rate of 75 percent by FY 2xxx,
etc.). The goals must be clearly measurable investment
outcomes, and if applicable, investment outputs. They do not
include the completion date of the module, milestones, or
investment, or general goals, such as, significant, better,
improved that do not have a quantitative or qualitative
measure.
Agencies must use Table 1 below for reporting performance
goals and measures for all non-IT investments and for existing
IT investments that were initiated prior to FY 2005. The table
can be extended to include measures for years beyond FY 2006.

Performance Information Table 1:

Fiscal Strategic Performance Actual/baseline Planned Performance
Year Goal(s) Measure (from Previous Performance Metric
Supported Year) Metric Results
(Target) (Actual)
2003 As per Not Not Applicable. Not Not Applicable.
discussion Applicable. Applicable.
with OMB
this data is
in Table 2.

All new IT investments initiated for FY 2005 and beyond must

use Table 2 and are required to use the Federal Enterprise
Architecture (FEA) Performance Reference Model (PRM). Please
use Table 2 and the PRM to identify the performance
 information pertaining to this major IT investment. Map all
Measurement Indicators to the corresponding "Measurement
Area" and "Measurement Grouping" identified in the PRM. There
should be at least one Measurement Indicator for at least four
different Measurement Areas (for each fiscal year). The PRM is
available at www.egov.gov.
Performance Information Table 2:
scal Measurement Measurement Measurement Measurement Baseline Planned Actua
ear Area Category Grouping Indicator Improvement Result
to the
Baseline
06 Customer Timeliness and Delivery Time Delivery Time: 94.7 98 98.0
Results Responsiveness % of Help Desk
calls that are
resolved within
one business
day.
06 Mission and Education Higher Higher 1 0 0
Business Education Education:
Results Number of
material
weaknesses -
FY2001 audit is
baseline.
06 Processes and Cycle Time and Cycle Time Cycle Time: 4.7 2.0 2.0
Activities Resource Time Number of
business days
to perform
month-end
close
procedures
06 Processes and Productivity and Productivity Productivity: % 32 27 1
Activities Efficiency of dollar
volume of total
transactions in
FMS that
require manual
entry
06 Technology Effectiveness User User 93.5 97 92.3
Requirements Requirements:
% of CCB-
approved
 change
requests
migrated to
production on
schedule and
not requiring
re-work
06 Technology Effectiveness User User 76 76 76
Satisfaction Satisfaction:
User
satisfaction
rating (ACSI
score).
Baseline as of
July 2005
06 Technology Information and External Data External Data 16.56 9.0 7.26
Data Sharing Sharing:
Average
processing
time (in hours)
for COD
transactions,
from point of
reception from
COD to point of
transmission to
GAPS. Baseline
= June-
September
2003 average
07 Customer Timeliness and Delivery Time Delivery Time: 94.7 98 TBD
Results Responsiveness % of Help Desk
calls that are
resolved within
one business
day.
07 Mission and Education Higher Higher 1 0 available
Business Education Education: Novembe
Results Number of 2007
material
weaknesses -
FY2001 audit is
baseline.
07 Processes and Cycle Time and Cycle Time Cycle Time: 4.7 2.0 TBD
Activities Resource Time Number of
business days
to perform
month-end
close
procedures
07 Processes and Productivity and Productivity Productivity: % 32 26 TBD
Activities Efficiency of dollar
volume of total
transactions in
FMS that
require manual
entry
07 Technology Effectiveness User User 93.5 97.5 TBD
Requirements Requirements:
% of CCB-
pproved
change
requests
migrated to
production on
schedule and
not requiring
re-work.
07 Technology Effectiveness User User 76 76 available
Satisfaction Satisfaction: August
User 2007
satisfaction
rating (ACSI
score).
Baseline as of
July 2005
07 Technology Information and External Data External Data 16.56 9.0 TBD
Data Sharing Sharing:
Average
processing
time (in hours)
for COD
transactions,
from point of
reception from
COD to point of
 transmission to
GAPS. Basline
= June-
September
2003 average.
08 Customer Timeliness and Delivery Time Delivery Time: 94.7 98 TBD
Results Responsiveness % of Help Desk
calls that are
resolved within
one business
day.
08 Mission and Education Higher Higher 1 0 available
Business Education Education: Novembe
Results Number of 2008
material
weaknesses -
FY2001 audit is
baseline.
08 Processes and Cycle Time and Cycle Time Cycle Time: 4.7 2.0 TBD
Activities Resource Time Number of
business days
to perform
month-end
close
procedures
08 Processes and Productivity and Productivity Productivity: % 32 26 TBD
Activities Efficiency of dollar
volume of total
transactions in
FMS that
require manual
entry
08 Technology Effectiveness User User 93.5 97.5 TBD
Requirements Requirements:
% of CCB-
pproved
change
requests
migrated to
production on
schedule and
not requiring
re-work.
08 Technology Effectiveness User User 76 76 available
Satisfaction Satisfaction: August
User 2008
satisfaction
rating (ACSI
score).
Baseline as of
July 2005
08 Technology Information and External Data External Data 16.56 9.0 TBD
Data Sharing Sharing:
Average
processing
time (in hours)
for COD
transactions,
from point of
reception from
COD to point of
transmission to
GAPS. Basline
= June-
September
2003 average.

Enterprise Architecture (EA)

In order to successfully address this area of the business case

and capital asset plan you must ensure the investment is
included in the agency's EA and Capital Planning and
Investment Control (CPIC) process, and is mapped to and
supports the FEA. You must also ensure the business case
demonstrates the relationship between the investment and the
business, performance, data, services, application, and
technology layers of the agency's EA.
1. Is this investment included in your agency's Yes
target enterprise architecture?
a. If "no," please explain why?

2. Is this investment included in the agency's EA Yes

Transition Strategy?
 a. If "yes," provide the investment name as Financial
identified in the Transition Strategy provided in the Management
agency's most recent annual EA Assessment. System
b. If "no," please explain why?

3. Service Reference Model (SRM) Table:

Identify the service components funded by this

major IT investment (e.g., knowledge
management, content management, customer
relationship management, etc.). Provide this
information in the format of the following table. For
detailed guidance regarding components, please
refer to http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/.
ncy Agency Service FEA SRM FEA SRM FEA Service FEA Service Internal BY Fu
onent Component Domain Service Component Component Component or Perce
me Description Type Reused Reused UPI External
Name Reuse?
FSA FMS
provides input
into a number
of audits of
Department
processes and
objectives.
These audits
Back
S Audit include, but Financial
Office Auditing No Reuse 15
are not limited Management
Services
to the financial
statement
audit, FISMA
audit, and
OMB Circular
A-123,
Appendix A
reviews.
S FSA FMS Back Financial Billing and No Reuse 20
s provides Office Management Accounting
ble and Accounts Services
Receivable for
ing Lenders. In
 addition, it is a
subledger to
the
Department's
general ledger,
providing
summarized
accounting
information
reported on
external
financial
reports.
FSA FMS
provides
significant
internal
controls to
financial
transactions
generated by
Title IV
S programs. In Back
Financial Internal
addition to Office No Reuse 30
Management Controls
s standard Services
Oracle Federal
Financial
application
controls, it
facilitates
reconciliation
to the FSA
feeder
systems.
The primary
purpose of
FSA FMS is to
S facilitate the Back
Financial Payment /
t processing of Office No Reuse 31
Management Settlement
ing Title IV Services
payments in a
controlled
environment.
S Support Security
Access Control Access Control No Reuse 2
Control Services Management
S User User
Identification
cation Identification Support Security
and No Reuse 2
and Services Management
Authentication
ication Authentication

Use existing SRM Components or identify as "NEW". A "NEW"

component is one not already identified as a service component
in the FEA SRM.
A reused component is one being funded by another
investment, but being used by this investment. Rather than
answer yes or no, identify the reused service component funded
by the other investment and identify the other investment using
the Unique Project Identifier (UPI) code from the OMB Ex 300
or Ex 53 submission.
'Internal' reuse is within an agency. For example, one agency
within a department is reusing a service component provided by
another agency within the same department. 'External' reuse is
one agency within a department reusing a service component
provided by another agency in another department. A good
example of this is an E-Gov initiative service being reused by
multiple organizations across the federal government.
Please provide the percentage of the BY requested funding
amount used for each service component listed in the table. If
external, provide the funding level transferred to another
agency to pay for the service.

4. Technical Reference Model (TRM) Table:

To demonstrate how this major IT investment aligns with the

FEA Technical Reference Model (TRM), please list the Service
Areas, Categories, Standards, and Service Specifications
supporting this IT investment.
FEA SRM FEA TRM FEA TRM FEA TRM Service
Component Service Area Service Service Specification
Category Standard (i.e. vendor or
product
name)
Billing and Service Access Collaboration / ClickCommerce
Accounting Access and Channels Communications Incorporated,
 COMM-PRESS
2000 Ver 4.4.2
Delivery *m* (005)
(master, triple
DES)
ClickCommerce
Incorporated,
Service COMM-PRESS
Payment / Access Collaboration /
Access and 2000 Ver 4.4.2
Settlement Channels Communications
Delivery *m* (005)
(master, triple
DES)
ClickCommerce
Incorporated,
Service COMM-PRESS
Access Collaboration /
Auditing Access and 2000 Ver 4.4.2
Channels Communications
Delivery *m* (005)
(master, triple
DES)
ClickCommerce
Incorporated,
Service COMM-PRESS
Internal Access Collaboration /
Access and 2000 Ver 4.4.2
Controls Channels Communications
Delivery *m* (005)
(master, triple
DES)
ClickCommerce
Incorporated,
Identification Service COMM-PRESS
Access Collaboration /
and Access and 2000 Ver 4.4.2
Channels Communications
Authentication Delivery *m* (005)
(master, triple
DES)
ClickCommerce
Incorporated,
Service COMM-PRESS
Access Collaboration /
Access Control Access and 2000 Ver 4.4.2
Channels Communications
Delivery *m* (005)
(master, triple
DES)
Billing and Service Database / Database Oracle
Accounting Platform and Storage Corporation,
 Oracle RDBMS,
Infrastructure Version 10.1.0.4
(10g)
Oracle
Service Corporation,
Payment / Database /
Platform and Database Oracle RDBMS,
Settlement Storage
Infrastructure Version 10.1.0.4
(10g)
Oracle
Service Corporation,
Database /
Auditing Platform and Database Oracle RDBMS,
Storage
Infrastructure Version 10.1.0.4
(10g)
Oracle
Service Corporation,
Internal Database /
Platform and Database Oracle RDBMS,
Controls Storage
Infrastructure Version 10.1.0.4
(10g)
Oracle
Identification Service Corporation,
Database /
and Platform and Database Oracle RDBMS,
Storage
Authentication Infrastructure Version 10.1.0.4
(10g)
Oracle
Service Corporation,
Database /
Access Control Platform and Database Oracle RDBMS,
Storage
Infrastructure Version 10.1.0.4
(10g)
Oracle
Corporation,
Oracle App
Service
Billing and Delivery Application Server-Apache
Platform and
Accounting Servers Servers 1.3.19 Open
Infrastructure
SSL 0.9.5a,
Version
1.0.2.2.2
Payment / Service Delivery Application Oracle
Settlement Platform and Servers Servers Corporation,
Infrastructure Oracle App
Server-Apache
1.3.19 Open
SSL 0.9.5a,
 Version
1.0.2.2.2
Oracle
Corporation,
Oracle App
Service
Delivery Application Server-Apache
Auditing Platform and
Servers Servers 1.3.19 Open
Infrastructure
SSL 0.9.5a,
Version
1.0.2.2.2
Oracle
Corporation,
Oracle App
Service
Internal Delivery Application Server-Apache
Platform and
Controls Servers Servers 1.3.19 Open
Infrastructure
SSL 0.9.5a,
Version
1.0.2.2.2
Oracle
Corporation,
Oracle App
Identification Service
Delivery Application Server-Apache
and Platform and
Servers Servers 1.3.19 Open
Authentication Infrastructure
SSL 0.9.5a,
Version
1.0.2.2.2
Oracle
Corporation,
Oracle App
Service
Delivery Application Server-Apache
Access Control Platform and
Servers Servers 1.3.19 Open
Infrastructure
SSL 0.9.5a,
Version
1.0.2.2.2
Oracle
Service Corporation,
Payment / Delivery Application
Platform and Oracle
Settlement Servers Servers
Infrastructure Financials
Release 11.5.10
Billing and Service Delivery Application Oracle
Accounting Platform and Servers Servers Corporation,
Infrastructure Oracle
 Financials
Release 11.5.10
Oracle
Service Corporation,
Delivery Application
Auditing Platform and Oracle
Servers Servers
Infrastructure Financials
Release 11.5.10
Oracle
Service Corporation,
Internal Delivery Application
Platform and Oracle
Controls Servers Servers
Infrastructure Financials
Release 11.5.10
Oracle
Identification Service Corporation,
Delivery Application
and Platform and Oracle
Servers Servers
Authentication Infrastructure Financials
Release 11.5.10
Oracle
Service Corporation,
Delivery Application
Access Control Platform and Oracle
Servers Servers
Infrastructure Financials
Release 11.5.10
Oracle
Corporation,
Identification Service Oracle
Delivery Application
and Platform and Financials
Servers Servers
Authentication Infrastructure Release 11.5.10
- General
Ledger
Oracle
Corporation,
Service Oracle
Billing and Delivery Application
Platform and Financials
Accounting Servers Servers
Infrastructure Release 11.5.10
- General
Ledger
Payment / Service Delivery Application Oracle
Settlement Platform and Servers Servers Corporation,
Infrastructure Oracle
Financials
Release 11.5.10
- General
 Ledger
Oracle
Corporation,
Service Oracle
Delivery Application
Auditing Platform and Financials
Servers Servers
Infrastructure Release 11.5.10
- General
Ledger
Oracle
Corporation,
Service Oracle
Internal Delivery Application
Platform and Financials
Controls Servers Servers
Infrastructure Release 11.5.10
- General
Ledger
Oracle
Corporation,
Service Oracle
Delivery Application
Access Control Platform and Financials
Servers Servers
Infrastructure Release 11.5.10
- General
Ledger
Oracle
Corporation,
Service
Payment / Delivery Application Oracle
Platform and
Settlement Servers Servers Financials
Infrastructure
Release 11.5.10
- Payables
Oracle
Corporation,
Service
Payment / Delivery Application Oracle
Platform and
Settlement Servers Servers Financials
Infrastructure
Release 11.5.10
- Purchasing
Oracle
Corporation,
Service
Billing and Delivery Application Oracle
Platform and
Accounting Servers Servers Financials
Infrastructure
Release 11.5.10
- Receivables
Billing and Service Delivery Application Oracle
Accounting Platform and Servers Servers Corporation,
 Oracle Public
Sector
Applications -
Infrastructure
Common and
Advanced
Patches Only
Oracle
Corporation,
Oracle Public
Service
Payment / Delivery Application Sector
Platform and
Settlement Servers Servers Applications -
Infrastructure
Common and
Advanced
Patches Only
Oracle
Corporation,
Oracle Public
Service
Delivery Application Sector
Auditing Platform and
Servers Servers Applications -
Infrastructure
Common and
Advanced
Patches Only
Oracle
Corporation,
Oracle Public
Service
Internal Delivery Application Sector
Platform and
Controls Servers Servers Applications -
Infrastructure
Common and
Advanced
Patches Only
Oracle
Corporation,
Oracle Public
Identification Service
Delivery Application Sector
and Platform and
Servers Servers Applications -
Authentication Infrastructure
Common and
Advanced
Patches Only
Access Control Service Delivery Application Oracle
Platform and Servers Servers Corporation,
Infrastructure Oracle Public
Sector
Applications -
 Common and
Advanced
Patches Only
Oracle
Corporation,
Service Oracle Public
Billing and Delivery Application
Platform and Sector
Accounting Servers Servers
Infrastructure Applications -
Public Sector
General Ledger
Oracle
Corporation,
Service Oracle Public
Payment / Delivery Application
Platform and Sector
Settlement Servers Servers
Infrastructure Applications -
Public Sector
General Ledger
Oracle
Corporation,
Service Oracle Public
Delivery Application
Auditing Platform and Sector
Servers Servers
Infrastructure Applications -
Public Sector
General Ledger
Oracle
Corporation,
Service Oracle Public
Internal Delivery Application
Platform and Sector
Controls Servers Servers
Infrastructure Applications -
Public Sector
General Ledger
Oracle
Corporation,
Identification Service Oracle Public
Delivery Application
and Platform and Sector
Servers Servers
Authentication Infrastructure Applications -
Public Sector
General Ledger
Access Control Service Delivery Application Oracle
Platform and Servers Servers Corporation,
Infrastructure Oracle Public
Sector
 Applications -
Public Sector
General Ledger
Oracle
Corporation,
Service Oracle Public
Payment / Delivery Application
Platform and Sector
Settlement Servers Servers
Infrastructure Applications -
Public Sector
Payables
Oracle
Corporation,
Service Oracle Public
Payment / Delivery Application
Platform and Sector
Settlement Servers Servers
Infrastructure Applications -
Public Sector
Purchasing
Oracle
Corporation,
Service Oracle Public
Billing and Delivery Application
Platform and Sector
Accounting Servers Servers
Infrastructure Applications -
Public Sector
Receivables
Oracle
Corporation,
Service
Billing and Delivery Application Oracle Public
Platform and
Accounting Servers Servers Sector
Infrastructure
Applications -
Release 11.5.10
Oracle
Corporation,
Service
Payment / Delivery Application Oracle Public
Platform and
Settlement Servers Servers Sector
Infrastructure
Applications -
Release 11.5.10
Oracle
Corporation,
Service
Delivery Application Oracle Public
Auditing Platform and
Servers Servers Sector
Infrastructure
Applications -
Release 11.5.10
 Oracle
Corporation,
Identification Service
Delivery Application Oracle Public
and Platform and
Servers Servers Sector
Authentication Infrastructure
Applications -
Release 11.5.10
Oracle
Corporation,
Service
Internal Delivery Application Oracle Public
Platform and
Controls Servers Servers Sector
Infrastructure
Applications -
Release 11.5.10
Oracle
Corporation,
Service
Delivery Application Oracle Public
Access Control Platform and
Servers Servers Sector
Infrastructure
Applications -
Release 11.5.10
Oracle
Corporation,
Service
Billing and Delivery Application Oracle U.S.
Platform and
Accounting Servers Servers Federal
Infrastructure
Financials -
Release 11.5.10
Oracle
Corporation,
Service
Payment / Delivery Application Oracle U.S.
Platform and
Settlement Servers Servers Federal
Infrastructure
Financials -
Release 11.5.10
Oracle
Corporation,
Service
Delivery Application Oracle U.S.
Auditing Platform and
Servers Servers Federal
Infrastructure
Financials -
Release 11.5.10
Oracle
Corporation,
Service
Internal Delivery Application Oracle U.S.
Platform and
Controls Servers Servers Federal
Infrastructure
Financials -
Release 11.5.10
 Oracle
Corporation,
Identification Service
Delivery Application Oracle U.S.
and Platform and
Servers Servers Federal
Authentication Infrastructure
Financials -
Release 11.5.10
Oracle
Corporation,
Service
Delivery Application Oracle U.S.
Access Control Platform and
Servers Servers Federal
Infrastructure
Financials -
Release 11.5.10
Oracle
Corporation,
Service Oracle U.S.
Internal Delivery Application
Platform and Federal
Controls Servers Servers
Infrastructure Financials - U.S.
Federal
Administrator
Oracle
Corporation,
Service Oracle U.S.
Billing and Delivery Application
Platform and Federal
Accounting Servers Servers
Infrastructure Financials - U.S.
Federal General
Ledger
Oracle
Corporation,
Service Oracle U.S.
Payment / Delivery Application
Platform and Federal
Settlement Servers Servers
Infrastructure Financials - U.S.
Federal General
Ledger
Oracle
Corporation,
Service Oracle U.S.
Delivery Application
Auditing Platform and Federal
Servers Servers
Infrastructure Financials - U.S.
Federal General
Ledger
Internal Service Delivery Application Oracle
Controls Platform and Servers Servers Corporation,
 Oracle U.S.
Federal
Infrastructure Financials - U.S.
Federal General
Ledger
Oracle
Corporation,
Identification Service Oracle U.S.
Delivery Application
and Platform and Federal
Servers Servers
Authentication Infrastructure Financials - U.S.
Federal General
Ledger
Oracle
Corporation,
Service Oracle U.S.
Delivery Application
Access Control Platform and Federal
Servers Servers
Infrastructure Financials - U.S.
Federal General
Ledger
Oracle
Corporation,
Service Oracle U.S.
Payment / Delivery Application
Platform and Federal
Settlement Servers Servers
Infrastructure Financials - U.S.
Federal
Payables
Oracle
Corporation,
Service Oracle U.S.
Payment / Delivery Application
Platform and Federal
Settlement Servers Servers
Infrastructure Financials - U.S.
Federal
Purchasing
Oracle
Corporation,
Service Oracle U.S.
Billing and Delivery Application
Platform and Federal
Accounting Servers Servers
Infrastructure Financials - U.S.
Federal
Receivables
Billing and Service Software Integrated Oracle
Accounting Platform and Engineering Development Corporation,
 Oracle
Developer 2000
Infrastructure Environment
Version 6i,
Patch 18
Oracle
Corporation,
Service Integrated
Payment / Software Oracle
Platform and Development
Settlement Engineering Developer 2000
Infrastructure Environment
Version 6i,
Patch 18
Oracle
Corporation,
Service Integrated
Software Oracle
Auditing Platform and Development
Engineering Developer 2000
Infrastructure Environment
Version 6i,
Patch 18
Oracle
Corporation,
Service Integrated
Internal Software Oracle
Platform and Development
Controls Engineering Developer 2000
Infrastructure Environment
Version 6i,
Patch 18
Oracle
Corporation,
Identification Service Integrated
Software Oracle
and Platform and Development
Engineering Developer 2000
Authentication Infrastructure Environment
Version 6i,
Patch 18
Oracle
Corporation,
Service Integrated
Software Oracle
Access Control Platform and Development
Engineering Developer 2000
Infrastructure Environment
Version 6i,
Patch 18
Oracle
Service Integrated Corporation,
Billing and Software
Platform and Development Oracle Forms
Accounting Engineering
Infrastructure Environment Version 6i,
Patch 18
Payment / Service Software Integrated Oracle
Settlement Platform and Engineering Development Corporation,
Infrastructure Environment Oracle Forms
 Version 6i,
Patch 18
Oracle
Service Integrated Corporation,
Software
Auditing Platform and Development Oracle Forms
Engineering
Infrastructure Environment Version 6i,
Patch 18
Oracle
Service Integrated Corporation,
Internal Software
Platform and Development Oracle Forms
Controls Engineering
Infrastructure Environment Version 6i,
Patch 18
Oracle
Identification Service Integrated Corporation,
Software
and Platform and Development Oracle Forms
Engineering
Authentication Infrastructure Environment Version 6i,
Patch 18
Oracle
Service Integrated Corporation,
Software
Access Control Platform and Development Oracle Forms
Engineering
Infrastructure Environment Version 6i,
Patch 18
Hewlett-Packard
Service
Billing and Support Platform Company,
Platform and
Accounting Platforms Dependent Compilers for
Infrastructure
HP-UX C/C++
Hewlett-Packard
Service
Payment / Support Platform Company,
Platform and
Settlement Platforms Dependent Compilers for
Infrastructure
HP-UX C/C++
Hewlett-Packard
Service
Support Platform Company,
Auditing Platform and
Platforms Dependent Compilers for
Infrastructure
HP-UX C/C++
Hewlett-Packard
Service
Internal Support Platform Company,
Platform and
Controls Platforms Dependent Compilers for
Infrastructure
HP-UX C/C++
Hewlett-Packard
Identification Service
Support Platform Company,
and Platform and
Platforms Dependent Compilers for
Authentication Infrastructure
HP-UX C/C++
 Hewlett-Packard
Service
Support Platform Company,
Access Control Platform and
Platforms Dependent Compilers for
Infrastructure
HP-UX C/C++
Service Hewlett-Packard
Billing and Support Platform
Platform and Company, HP-
Accounting Platforms Dependent
Infrastructure UX Version 11i
Service Hewlett-Packard
Payment / Support Platform
Platform and Company, HP-
Settlement Platforms Dependent
Infrastructure UX Version 11i
Service Hewlett-Packard
Support Platform
Auditing Platform and Company, HP-
Platforms Dependent
Infrastructure UX Version 11i
Service Hewlett-Packard
Internal Support Platform
Platform and Company, HP-
Controls Platforms Dependent
Infrastructure UX Version 11i
Identification Service Hewlett-Packard
Support Platform
and Platform and Company, HP-
Platforms Dependent
Authentication Infrastructure UX Version 11i
Service Hewlett-Packard
Support Platform
Access Control Platform and Company, HP-
Platforms Dependent
Infrastructure UX Version 11i
Service Components identified in the previous question should
be entered in this column. Please enter multiple rows for FEA
SRM Components supported by multiple TRM Service
Specifications
In the Service Specification field, Agencies should provide
information on the specified technical standard or vendor
product mapped to the FEA TRM Service Standard, including
model or version numbers, as appropriate.

5. Will the application leverage No

existing components and/or
applications across the
Government (i.e., FirstGov,
Pay.Gov, etc)?
a. If "yes," please describe.

6. Does this investment provide No

the public with access to a
government automated
information system?
a. If "yes," does customer
access require specific software
(e.g., a specific web browser
version)?
1. If "yes," provide the
specific product name(s) and
version number(s) of the
required software and the date
when the public will be able to
access this investment by any
software (i.e. to ensure
equitable and timely access of
government information and
services).

Exhibit 300: Part II: Planning, Acquisition and Performance

Information

Alternatives Analysis

Part II should be completed only for investments identified as

"Planning" or "Full Acquisition," or "Mixed Life-Cycle"
investments in response to Question 6 in Part I, Section A
above.
In selecting the best capital asset, you should identify and
consider at least three viable alternatives, in addition to the
current baseline, i.e., the status quo. Use OMB Circular A- 94 for
all investments, and the Clinger Cohen Act of 1996 for IT
investments, to determine the criteria you should use in your
Benefit/Cost Analysis.
1. Did you conduct an alternatives analysis for this Yes
project?
a. If "yes," provide the date the analysis was 9/11/2006
completed?
b. If "no," what is the anticipated date this analysis
will be completed?
c. If no analysis is planned, please briefly explain why:
 2. Alternative Analysis Results:

Use the results of your alternatives analysis to

complete the following table:
Send Alternative Description of Risk Risk
to Analyzed Alternative Adjusted Adjusted
OMB Lifecycle Lifecycle
Costs Benefits
estimate estimate
Discontinue FMS at the end
True Alternative 1
of FY2005.
Replace FMS with custom
True Alternative 2 solution or new COTS
product
Maintain FMS and provide
support for new
requirements. This
alternative implements
True Alternative 3 requirements that are
expected to strengthen
controls, improve customer
satisfaction, and recognize
processing efficiencies.
Maintain FMS, but provide
no support for new
requirements (e.g., CSB,
Advance, GAPs Re-design,
Form 2000 Re-design, and
Internal Control &
Performance
True Status Quo
Improvements for
Operations processing).
This alternative provides
no new services, creates
no additional processing
efficiencies, or internal
control improvements.

3. Which alternative was selected by the Agency's

Executive/Investment Committee and why was it chosen?
4. What specific qualitative benefits will be realized?

Risk Management

You should have performed a risk assessment during the early

planning and initial concept phase of this investment's life-
cycle, developed a risk-adjusted life-cycle cost estimate and a
plan to eliminate, mitigate or manage risk, and be actively
managing risk throughout the investment's life-cycle.
1. Does the investment have a Yes
Risk Management Plan?
a. If "yes," what is the date of 1/31/2007
the plan?
b. Has the Risk Management No
Plan been significantly changed
since last year's submission to
OMB?
c. If "yes," describe any significant changes:

2. If there currently is no plan,

will a plan be developed?
a. If "yes," what is the
planned completion date?
b. If "no," what is the strategy for managing the risks?

3. Briefly describe how investment risks are reflected in the life

cycle cost estimate and investment schedule:
Investment risks are reflected in costs and schedule as follows: 1)
Project management performs quarterly risk re-assessment to identify
new risks and evaluate the status of existing risks. This requires
Government FTE. 2) The Contracts office is flooded with contracting
actions at the end of the fiscal year. We have avoided the risk of ending
up with less-than-thorough contract actions or losing funding for the
project by having our new contracts start and end at times that do not
coincide with the fiscal year-end. Many of these contracts have option
years that require action. Because they are structured to require action
at times other than year-end, we have plenty of time to review the
actions and get the best value for the government. 3) Also, as stated
previously, we establish our contracts with many option years. This
greatly reduces life-cycle cost risk, allowing us to very accurately
predict some of our maintenance, licensing, and security costs. Because
it is an option at the government's discretion to use, however, we are
not subjected to the risk of creating a monopoly for future investments.
4) Since 2003, we have been migrating project management functions
to government FTE, increasing FTE count from 5 in 2003 to 10.5 by
2007. This greatly reduces the risk of creating a monopoly for future
procurements, the risk of loss of key project resources, and the risk of
overall investment failure. 5) Many FY2007 and future system changes
are dependent on the implementation schedules of other major
initatives (i.e., CSB, ADvance, G5, O11ie, etc.). This increases our
schedule and cost risk significantly. Task orders associated with this
significant schedule risk are time and materials in order to allow for
schedule changes without associated costs. To mitigate the risks caused
by time and material contracts, we established strong
incentives/disincentives and continue to increase our project
management capacity/skills with government FTEs.

Cost and Schedule Performance

1. Does the earned value Yes

management system meet the
criteria in ANSI/EIA Standard-
748?

2. Answer the following questions about current cumulative cost

and schedule performance. The numbers reported below should
reflect current actual information. (Per OMB requirements
Cost/Schedule Performance information should include both
Government and Contractor Costs):
a. What is the Planned Value 64170.300000
(PV)?
b. What is the Earned Value 64738.100000
(EV)?
c. What is the actual cost of 3107.283000
work performed (AC)?
d. What costs are included in Contractor and Government
the reported Cost/Schedule
Performance information
(Government Only/Contractor
Only/Both)?
 e. "As of" date: 12/31/2006
3. What is the calculated 0.943000
Schedule Performance Index
(SPI= EV/PV)?
4. What is the schedule -233.364000
variance (SV = EV-PV)?
5. What is the calculated Cost 1.237000
Performance Index (CPI =
EV/AC)?
6. What is the cost variance 737.646000
(CV=EV-AC)?
7. Is the CV% or SV% greater No
than +/- 10%? (CV%= CV/EV
x 100; SV%= SV/PV x 100)
a. If "yes," was it the?
b. If "yes," explain the variance:

c. If "yes," what corrective actions are being taken?

8. Have any significant changes No

been made to the baseline
during the past fiscal year?
8. If "yes," when was it No
approved by OMB?