Scribd
Upload
157 views2 pages

VI. Rule 3, Sections 4 To 6: Parties To A Civil Action: /marmo vs. Anacay, G.R. No. 182585, Nov. 27, 2009

This document lists numerous legal cases cited in Rule 3 of the Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 3 discusses parties to a civil action and is divided into sections addressing: 1) parties to a civil action; 2-3) case law examples; 4-6) additional parties; 7-12) more case law examples; and 13-19) further case law examples relating to parties to a civil action. The document provides an overview of Rule 3 and references many Supreme Court cases that have helped define parties that can be included in civil actions according to Philippine law.

Uploaded by

johnmiggy
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
157 views2 pages

VI. Rule 3, Sections 4 To 6: Parties To A Civil Action: /marmo vs. Anacay, G.R. No. 182585, Nov. 27, 2009

This document lists numerous legal cases cited in Rule 3 of the Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 3 discusses parties to a civil action and is divided into sections addressing: 1) parties to a civil action; 2-3) case law examples; 4-6) additional parties; 7-12) more case law examples; and 13-19) further case law examples relating to parties to a civil action. The document provides an overview of Rule 3 and references many Supreme Court cases that have helped define parties that can be included in civil actions according to Philippine law.

Uploaded by

johnmiggy
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Rule 3 Sections 1 to 3: Parties to a Civil Action /Iron and Steel Authority vs.

. CA, 249 SCRA 538 (1995) /Travel Wide Associated Sales, Inc. vs CA, 199 SCRA 205 (1991) /Ralla vs. Ralla, 199 SCRA SCRA 495 (1991.) /Tampingco vs. IAC, 207 SCRA 652 /House International Building Tenants Assoc. vs. IAC, 151 SCRA 703 (1987) Go vs. Cordero, G.R. No. 164703, May 4, 2010 /Golango vs. Jone B. Fung, G.R. No. 157952, September 8, 2009. /Equitable PCI Bank, Inc (now known as Banco De Oro-EPCI, Inc.) vs. Heirs of Antonio C. Tiu, et al., G.R. No. 178529, September 4, 2009. /Pascual vs. Pascual, G.R. No. 157830, Nov 17, 2005 Southern Hemisphere Engagement Network vs. Anti-Terrorism Council, G.R. No. 178552, October 5, 2010

VI.

Rule 3, Sections 4 to 6: Parties to a Civil Action

/Wong vs. IAC, 200 SCRA 792 /Mariano vs. CA, G.R. No. 151283, June 7, 1989 /Spouses Buado vs. CA, G.R. No. 145222, April 24, 2009 /Begosa vs. Chairman, PVA, 32 SCRA 466 (1970) /Mobil Phil. Vs. Customs, Arrastre ( 18 SCRA 1120) (1966) /American Express Co. vs. Santiago, 49 SCRA 75 (1973) VII. RULE 3, SECTIONS 7 TO 12 (Parties to a Civil Action) Bulawan vs. Aquende, G.R. No. 182819, June 22, 2011 /Dael vs. Teves, 136 SCRA 199 (1985) /Seno vs. Mangubat, 156 SCRA 113 (1987) /Lotte Phils vs. dela Cruz, G.R. No. 1663302, July 28, 2005 /Quiombing vs. Court of Appeals, 189 SCRA 325 (1990) Pimentel vs. Senate Committee, G.R. No. 1877714, Mar. 8, 2011 /Domingo vs. Scheer, 421 SCRA 468 /Chua vs. Torres, G.R. No. 151900, Aug. 30, 2005. /Republic vs. Campos G.R. No. 84895 May 4, 1989 /Malagarte vs. CA, G.R. No. 166519, March 31, 2009 /Marmo vs. Anacay, G.R. No. 182585, Nov. 27, 2009

/Carandang vs. De Guzman, G.R. No. 160347 November 29, 2006

/Limos vs. Sps. Odones, G.R. No. 186979, August 11, 2010 VIII. RULE 3, SECTIONS 13 TO 19: Parties to a Civil Action

Chiang Kai Shek School vs. CA, G.R. No. 58028. April 18, 1989. Atty. Lavina vs. CA, 171 SCRA 691 (1989) Lawas vs. CA, 146 SCRA 173 (1986) Vda. de Salazar vs. CA, G.R. NO. 121510 Bonifacio vs. Dizon, (1989) The Heirs of the Late Florentina Nuguid vda de Haberer vs. CA, 104 SCRA 534 (1981) Gochan vs. Young, G.R. No. 131889, March 12, 2001 Atty. Rogelio E. Sarsaba vs. Fe vda De Te, represented by her Attorney-in-Fact Faustino Castaeda, G.R. No. 175910, July 30, 2009. Dagadag vs. Tongnawa, G.R. 161166-67, Feb. 03, 2005 Carandang vs. Heirs of Quirino de Guzman, G.R. No. 160347, November 29, 2006

You might also like