Linear Time Variant Channel
Linear Time Variant Channel
=
= =
`
)
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( ) 2
1
c n
N
j f t
n n
n
r t t x t t e
=
=
= =
( ) ( ) ( )
, r t h t x t d
n
(t) represents the carrier phase distortion by n
th
scatterer.
Thus,
n
(t) will change by 2 whenever
n
(t) changes by 1/f
c
.
This means that
n
(t) have a far grater effect on the transmitted
signal than changes in
n
(t), as a small change (such as motion) in
the scatterer can cause a significant change in the phase but not on
the amplitude.
( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( )
1
,
n
N
j t
n n
n
h t t e t
=
=
( )
( )
-
Dirac delta function:
0, 0
, 0
and
1
t
t
t
t dt
=
=
= =
= =
df e t f H t f H F t h
d e t h t h F t f H
f j
f
f j
2 1
2
, , ,
, , ,
( ) ( )
2
,
j f t
r t R f t e df
=
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) | | t x F f X
f X t f H t f R
=
= , ,
TLT-6206 Radio Propagation in Wireless Networks 52
Doppler shift
The time variations, or dynamic changes in the propagation path
lengths, can be related directly to the motion of the receiver and
indirectly to the Doppler effect.
The rate of change of phase due to motion is apparent as a Doppler
frequency shift of each propagation path.
Scatterer
A
A
d
l
TLT-6206 Radio Propagation in Wireless Networks 53
Doppler shift
The incremental distance d=vt, which on the other hand, is
l=dcos() in path lenght difference.
The corresponding change in the received signal phase is
and in the change in the frequency
where f
d
is the Doppler shift.
Negative Doppler shift indicates that the mobile is travelling away
from the source and positive indicated that the mobile is heading
towards the source.
( )
cos
2 2 t v
l
= =
( )
d
f
v
t
f = =
cos
2
1
TLT-6206 Radio Propagation in Wireless Networks 54
Doppler shift
TLT-6206 Radio Propagation in Wireless Networks 57
Doppler spread function
The Doppler spread function H(f,v) affects the received signal
spectrum as
where v is a variable describing the Doppler shift.
The relation between the time-variant transfer function H(f,t) and
the Doppler spread function H(f,v) is
( ) ( ) ( )
= dv v v f H v f X f R ,
( ) ( ) | | ( )
( ) ( ) | | ( )
= =
= =
dv e v f H v f H F t f H
dt e t f H t f H F v f H
vt j
v
vt j
2 1
2
, , ,
, , ,
TLT-6206 Radio Propagation in Wireless Networks 58
Doppler spread function
Hence, being time-variant in the time domain can be equivalently
described by having Doppler shifts in the frequency domain.
Doppler spread function describes the broadening of the spectrum
by the time rate of change of the radio channel.
TLT-6206 Radio Propagation in Wireless Networks 59
Delay-Doppler spread function
The delay-Doppler spread function (also scattering function) is
the Fourier transform of the channel impulse response h(,t) with
respect to t:
It provides information how much signal power is found in signal
components with a certain propagation delay and Doppler shift v.
Given the channel input signal x(t), the output corresponds to
( ) ( ) | | ( )
= = dt e t h t h F v H
vt j
t
2
, , ,
( ) ( ) ( )
2
,
j vt
r t x t H v e dvd
=
TLT-6206 Radio Propagation in Wireless Networks 60
Relation between system functions
Channel correlation functions and
parameters
TLT-6206 Radio Propagation in Wireless Networks 62
Channel correlation functions
When the channel changes randomly with time, h(,t), H(f,t),
H(f,v), H(,v) are random processes and demanding to characterize.
Assuming the random processes have zero mean, the interest lies in
correlation functions.
Assumptions
1) the channel impulse response is a wide-sense stationary (WSS) process
2) the channel impulse response at
1
and
2
are uncorrelated if
1
2
for any t.
If both assumptions hold, the channel is said to be wide-sense
stationary uncorrelated scattering (WSSUS) channel.
TLT-6206 Radio Propagation in Wireless Networks 63
Delay power spectral density
The correlation function of the channel impulse response is given
as a function of propagation delays and time difference:
Under assumption 2), the autocorrelation function becomes
where
At t=0, the multipath intensity profile of the channel is
( ) ( ) ( )
*
1 2 1 2
1
, ; , ;
2
h
t E h t h t t ( +
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )
1 2 1 1 2
, ; ,
or
, ; ,
h h
h h
t t
t t
=
+ =
( ) ( ) 0 ,
h h
( ) ( )
, , ;
h h
t t d = +
= + (
(
( = +
(
( )
h
( )
( )
d
d
h
h
n
n
TLT-6206 Radio Propagation in Wireless Networks 65
Delay power spectral density
The mean propagation delay, or the first moment, is thus
and the rms (root-mean-square) delay spread is
( )
( )
d
d
h
h
( )
( )
( )
2
h
h
d
d
T
m
=
T
m
=rms multipath delay spread
TLT-6206 Radio Propagation in Wireless Networks 66
Frequency and time correlation functions
If the channel impulse response, h(,t), is WSS, then also the
channel transfer function, H(f,t) is WSS with respect to t.
The autocorrelation function of H(f,t) is defined as:
Due to duality between time and frequency
( ) ( ) ( )
*
1 2 1 2
1
, ; , ;
2
H
f f t E H f t H f t t ( +
( ) ( )
( )
( )
( )
2 1
2
1 2
2
, , ,
,
,
j f f
H h
j f
h
H
f f t t e d
t e d
f t
=
=
( +
=
( ) f
H
( )
c
f
TLT-6206 Radio Propagation in Wireless Networks 68
Frequency and time correlation functions
Moreover, we have
meaning that a large multipath delay
results in a small coherence bandwidth.
The frequency correlation function states that frequency
components separated by a frequency width greater than the
coherence bandwidth are distorted in an uncorrelated manner.
The degree of fading depends on the relations between the channel
coherence bandwidth and signal bandwidth:
If (f
c
) < W Frequency selective fading
If (f
c
) >> W Frequency nonselective fading or flat fading
where W is the transmit signal bandwidth.
( )
m
c
T
f
1
~
TLT-6206 Radio Propagation in Wireless Networks 69
Frequency and time correlation functions
In , letting f=0,
we will get the time correlation function.
It characterises how fast the channel transfer function changes with
time at each frequency. The nominal width of is called the
channel coherence time, (t)
c
, and it informs the time after which
the fading is very much different.
If the channel coherence time
is more than symbol duration,
channel exhibits slow fading.
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) | | t t f H t f H E t t
H H
+ = , ,
2
1
, 0
*
( ) t
H
( )
,
H
f t
TLT-6206 Radio Propagation in Wireless Networks 70
Doppler power spectral density
The autocorrelation function of the Doppler spread function H(f,v)
is
which in WSSUS channel becomes
Moreover, from the Fourier transform of frequency-time
correlation function with respect to t, it can be obtained:
( ) ( ) | |
2 2 1 1
*
, ,
2
1
v f H v f H E
( ) ( )
2 1 1
, v v v f
H
( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )
=
=
t d e t v v
t d e t f v f
t v j
H H H
t v j
H H
2
2
, 0
, ,
0 = f
TLT-6206 Radio Propagation in Wireless Networks 71
Doppler power spectral density
is a PSD in terms of the Doppler shift, and it is called the
Doppler PSD.
The nominal width of the Doppler PSD, B
d
, is called the Doppler
spread.
Relation between time correlation function and Doppler PSD
yields:
From the Doppler PSD, statistical n
th
moment of the channel can be found by
( ) v
H
( )
d
c
B
t
1
~
( )
( )
=
dv v
dv v v
v
H
H
n
n
TLT-6206 Radio Propagation in Wireless Networks 72
Doppler power spectral density
The mean Doppler shift, or the first moment, is
and the rms Doppler spread is
As an approximation, it is assumed that
( )
( )
H
H
v v dv
v
v dv
( )
( )
( )
2
H
v
H
v v v dv
v dv
v d
B
TLT-6206 Radio Propagation in Wireless Networks 73
Relations between channel correlations and parameters
TLT-6206 Radio Propagation in Wireless Networks 74
Classification of channels
In a dispersive medium, there are two kinds of spreads: Doppler
spread B
d
and multipath delay spread T
m
(delay spread). The
Doppler spread is spreading in frequency where as multipath
spread is spreading in time.
In a strict sense, all media are dispersive. We can classify
characteristics of a medium based on the symbol duration T and
the signal bandwidth W.
Non-dispersive but fading channel is observed if
In practical systems, the symbol duration and channel bandwidth
can be selected so that channel becomes nondispersive.
W B T T
W
T
T
B
m m d
<< >> << << and or
1
and
1
c
TLT-6206 Radio Propagation in Wireless Networks 75
Classification of channels
Time-dispersive channels
T T
T
B
W
T T T
c m m
>> << >> >> and
1
but
1
and
d
Source: Lee, 1993
TLT-6206 Radio Propagation in Wireless Networks 76
Classification of channels
Frequency-dispersive channels
T T
W
T
T
B W B
m m d
<< << >> >> and
1
but
1
and
d
Source: Lee, 1993
Frequency-Nonselective, Slowly Fading Chan-
nel
As was described earlier, the frequency-nonselective channel results multiplicative distor-
tion to the transmitted signal as
If the fading is slow, the received signal can be written in the presence of noise as
In the case that can be followed perfectly at the receiver, ideal coherent detection can be
applied -> now only the effect of has to be taken into account.
In the case of binary PSK, the error rate in AWGN channel can be written as
where .
For binary FSK the error rate is
r
l
t ( ) C 0 t ; ( )s
l
t ( ) =
r
l
t ( ) e
j
s
l
t ( ) z t ( ) + = , 0 t T
P
2
b
( ) Q 2
b
( ) =
b
2
E
b
N
0
=
P
2
b
( ) Q
b
( ) =
Frequency-Nonselective, Slowly Fading Chan-
nel (cont.)
In the case that changes randomly and hence also changes randomly, the average
error rate is
In Rayleigh fading case, is Rayleigh distributed and , where
.
After integration well have
b
P
2
P
2
b
( ) p
b
( )
b
d
=
p
b
( )
1
b
-----e
b
b
=
b
E
b
N
0
-------E
2
( ) =
P
2
1
2
--- 1
b
1
b
+
---------------
, for binary PSK
1
2
--- 1
b
2
b
+
---------------
, for binary FSK
=
Frequency-Nonselective, Slowly Fading Chan-
nel (cont.)
When the channel response varies more rapidly with respect to symbol duration, the phase
estimation must be carried out only for limited number of signaling intervals.
In DPSK, only the phase difference of two consecutive symbols is detected and the
method is quite robust to phase changes in the channel.
For DPSK in AWGN channel we have and hence the average error in
Rayleigh fading channel can be solved to be .
FSK with noncoherent detection (envelope or sq. law) is even more robust technique than
DPSK in fast fading channels. For noncoherent orthogonal FSK, and
after calculation
.
P
2
b
( )
1
2
---e
b
=
P
2
1
2 1
b
+ ( )
----------------------- =
P
2
b
( )
1
2
---e
b
2
=
P
2
1
2
b
+
--------------- =
Frequency-Nonselective, Slowly Fading Chan-
nel (cont.)
If we let grow very large for the discussed binary signaling methods, the resulting bit
error probabilities can be approximated as
It can be seen that for large SNR, coherent PSK is 3 dB better than DPSK and 6 dB better
than noncoherent FSK.
Error rates are inversely proportional to SNR, whereas in AWGN-case the decrease is
exponential.
b
P
2
1 4
b
for coherent PSK
1 2
b
for coherent, orthogonal FSK
1 2
b
for DPSK
1
b
for noncoherent, orthogonal FSK