50 Bookreview Flying in The Face Of-Criminalization Schnitker
50 Bookreview Flying in The Face Of-Criminalization Schnitker
50 Bookreview Flying in The Face Of-Criminalization Schnitker
e-zine edition 50
and, second, will be totally oblivious as to whether statements given during the technical investigation and the nal accident investigation report will be used against them in a court of law. Airline pilots, air trafc controllers and other front line operators in civil aviation, indicating those people who perform the actual work, are concerned about what they perceive to be an increasing trend towards criminalizing unintentional actions or omissions of dedicated aviation professionals following major accidents or serious incidents. This trend of more aggressive law enforcement activity in aircraft accident investigations has the potential to disturb efforts in preventing accidents and incidents, to interfere with the efcient technical accident investigation, to limit the accessibility of gathering important data and to hamper the authorities from issuing vital safety recommendations to successfully prevent the recurrence of similar accidents. In global aviation criminalization of aviation accidents and incidents is a delicate issue. On the one side, in the interest of civil aviation safety, we should judge and punish individuals guilty of appropriate criminal conduct as well as those who willfully and consistently violate safety rules and regulations. On the other side, we do not want to criminalize individuals because of unfortunate and unforeseen consequences of human error, sometimes after meticulous investigation identied as the cause of an accident. A predominant risk of criminalizing aviation accidents and incidents is the refusal of witnesses to cooperate with inquiries, as individuals appeal to rights in order to protect themselves from criminal prosecution. The willingness of cooperating in accident investigations by front line operators will decline dramatically if criminal prosecution does become a realistic phenomenon. Obviously, nobody wants to provide self-incriminating evidence to be used by criminal investigators or prosecutors for the purpose of assessing guilt and punishment in a criminal prosecution. Aviation professionals not only will be subject to possible criminal proceedings, but could as well face punishment from
several other sources such as civil actions, regulatory sanctions and disciplinary or administrative measures. Flying in the Face of Criminalization, with its unique collection of case studies, gives aviation professionals an insight into the law of negligence and how it applies to their profession. The book is essential reading for aviation professionals as well as the aviation authorities and judicial authorities that regulate their activity. About the Authors:
Dr. Soa Michaelides-Mateou holds a Doctorate from the University of Middlesex, a BA and a law degree (LLB) from the University of Witwatersrand. She is currently an Associate Professor in the Law Department at the University of Nicosia. She is an aviationlegal consultant who has participated in a number of aviation litigation cases and currently a director of MM Aviation Consultancy Ltd. Captain Dr. Andreas Mateou holds a Doctorate from the University of Middlesex, a MSc in Aviation Management from the University of New South Wales and a law degree (LLB) from the University of London. He has 25 years ying experience with more than 16000 ying hours. He is also a part-time lecturer in Law at the University of Nicosia. He has been an aviation safety and legal consultant in a number of aviation litigation cases and is a director of MM Aviation Consultancy Ltd.
e-zine edition 50