Types of Neutral Earthing in Power Distribution (Part 1)
Types of Neutral Earthing in Power Distribution (Part 1)
Types of Neutral Earthing in Power Distribution (Part 1)
com/types-of-neutral-earthing-in-power-distribution-part-1
Introduction
In the early power systems were mainly Neut ral ungrounded due to the fact that the first ground fault did not require the tripping of the system. An unscheduled shutdown on the first ground fault was particularly undesirable for continuous process industries. These power systems required ground detection systems, but locating the fault often proved difficult. Although achieving the initial goal, the ungrounded system provided no control of transient
over-voltages. A capacitive coupling exists between the system conductors and ground in a typical dist ribut ion syst em. As a result, this series resonant L-C circuit can create over-voltages well in excess of line-to-line voltage when subjected to repetitive re-strikes of one phase to ground. This in turn, reduces insulation life resulting in possible equipment failure. Neutral grounding systems are similar to fuses in that they do nothing until something in the system goes wrong. Then, like fuses, they protect personnel and equipment from damage. Damage comes from two factors, how long the fault lasts and how large the fault current is. Ground relays trip breakers and limit how long a fault lasts and Neutral grounding resistors limit how large the fault current is.
Advantages
After the first ground fault, assuming it remains as a single fault, the circuit may continue in operation, permitting continued production until a convenient shut down for maintenance can be scheduled.
Disadvantages
1. The interaction between the faulted system and its distributed capacitance may cause transient over-voltages (several times normal) to appear from line to ground during normal switching of a circuit having a line-to ground fault (short). These over voltages may cause insulation failures at points other than the original fault. 2. A second fault on another phase may occur before the first fault can be cleared. This can result in very high line-to-line fault currents, equipment damage and disruption of both circuits. 3. The cost of equipment damage. 4. Complicate for locating fault(s), involving a tedious process of trial and error: first isolating the correct feeder, then the branch, and finally, the equipment at fault. The result is unnecessarily lengthy and expensive down downtime.
Ungrounded neutral system
It also greatly reduces the shock hazard to personnel! If the system is not solidly grounded, the neutral point of the system would float with respect to ground as a function of load subjecting the line-to-neutral loads to voltage unbalances and instability. The single-phase earth fault current in a solidly earthed system may exceed the three phase fault current. The magnitude of the current depends on the fault location and the fault resistance. One way to reduce the earth fault current is to leave some of the transformer neutrals unearthed.
Advantages
The main advantage of solidly earthed systems is low over voltages, which makes the earthing design common at high voltage levels (HV).
Disadvantages
1. This system involves all the drawbacks and hazards of high earth fault current: maximum damage and disturbances. 2. There is no service continuity on the faulty feeder. 3. The danger for personnel is high during the fault since the touch voltages created are high.
Applications
1. Distributed neutral conductor 2. 3-phase + neutral distribution 3. Use of the neutral conductor as a protective conductor with systematic earthing at each transmission pole 4. Used when the short-circuit power of the source is low To be continued in Types of neutral earthing in power distribution (part 2)
R e f e re nce s:
By Michael D. Seal, P.E., GE Senior Specification Engineer. IEEE Standard 141-1993, Recommended Practice for Electrical Power Distribution for Industrial Plants Don Selkirk, P.Eng, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada
Recommended by others