Gender in Management: An International Journal

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 17

Gender in Management: An International Journal

Emerald Article: The transition of midlife women from organisational into self-employment Julie Hodges

Article information:
To cite this document: Julie Hodges, (2012),"The transition of midlife women from organisational into self-employment", Gender in Management: An International Journal, Vol. 27 Iss: 3 pp. 186 - 201 Permanent link to this document: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17542411211221277 Downloaded on: 20-12-2012 References: This document contains references to 114 other documents To copy this document: [email protected] This document has been downloaded 194 times since 2012. *

Users who downloaded this Article also downloaded: *


Julie Hodges, (2012),"The transition of midlife women from organisational into self-employment", Gender in Management: An International Journal, Vol. 27 Iss: 3 pp. 186 - 201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17542411211221277 Julie Hodges, (2012),"The transition of midlife women from organisational into self-employment", Gender in Management: An International Journal, Vol. 27 Iss: 3 pp. 186 - 201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17542411211221277 Julie Hodges, (2012),"The transition of midlife women from organisational into self-employment", Gender in Management: An International Journal, Vol. 27 Iss: 3 pp. 186 - 201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17542411211221277

Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by KAHRAMANMARAS SUTCU IMAM UNIVERSITY For Authors: If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service. Information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com With over forty years' experience, Emerald Group Publishing is a leading independent publisher of global research with impact in business, society, public policy and education. In total, Emerald publishes over 275 journals and more than 130 book series, as well as an extensive range of online products and services. Emerald is both COUNTER 3 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.
*Related content and download information correct at time of download.

The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/1754-2413.htm

GM 27,3

The transition of midlife women from organisational into self-employment


Julie Hodges
Newcastle University Business School, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the transition of midlife women from employment in organizations to self-employment. It examines how midlife women account for their transition from organizations to self-employment; why they opted for self-employment rather than simply changing organizations and their experience of self-employment. Design/methodology/approach This paper is based on semi-structured interviews (n 100), with women between the ages of 46 and 60 who have moved into self-employment from organizational employment. Findings Two themes emerged from the study. The rst was the negative organizational experience of some of the women which had caused dissatisfaction and disenchantment and therefore self-employment was seen as the only next step. The second theme was changes triggered by a positive proactive choice to move into self-employment. Research limitations/implications There are limitations to using individual perceptions and anecdotes. It cannot be assumed that the women in this study represent the views of all midlife women. Practical implications Silence about midlife women leaving organizations perpetuates high costs for both the organization and the individual involved. Organizations need to address the negative and discriminatory perceptions about midlife women and recognize the trend towards more, not fewer, older women in the workplace and value the experience, skills and knowledge they bring. Originality/value The paper is original in that the focus is on women in midlife, which is unique, as previous research about women in organizations has rarely encompassed the experiences of this group of women moving into self-employment. Keywords Women, Entrepreneurialism, Midlife, Self-employment, Women entrepreneurs Paper type Research paper

186

Gender in Management: An International Journal Vol. 27 No. 3, 2012 pp. 186-201 q Emerald Group Publishing Limited 1754-2413 DOI 10.1108/17542411211221277

Introduction In the current labour market there is greater awareness that job security is weakening and that it is increasingly important for individuals to develop their own employability (Patterson and Mavin, 2009). Self-employment or small business ownership is seen as a viable and often attractive career move, particularly for women and older workers (Greene and Storey, 2002; Platman, 2004; Singh and DeNoble, 2003). In most OECD countries the proportion of people over 50 who start a small business is growing (Curran and Blackburn, 2001; Morris and Mallier, 2003), while globally, older people are responsible for 20 percent more start-up businesses now than ten years ago (Singh and DeNoble, 2003). Increasingly, professional women are leaving waged employment in favour of self-employment (Moore and Buttner, 1997); female entrepreneurship is considered to be one of the fastest growing sectors (Terjesen, 2005), with self-employment often represented as opening more opportunities for women as it offers more exibility

in organizing work life and accommodating home life better (Banyard, 2010; Harding et al., 2004). A less competitive and usually smaller work environment, such as that offered by self-employment, has been described as enhancing opportunities for cooperation among organizational members, reducing gender role stereotypes (Calais et al., 2009), and allowing women to escape from under the glass ceiling (Mattis, 2004). Yet for women business owners, gender has been found to be a disadvantage on markets for (start-up) capital as well as in the general evaluation of their entrepreneurial success (Carter et al., 2007; Marlow and McAdam, 2012). Given such barriers the decision to leave formal careers to begin new ventures is not one that women can take lightly (Marlow and Patton, 2005). A more fundamental debate about how free women are in such choices emphasizes that their decisions need to be understood as constrained choices, restricted by gender-biased organizational structures, policies and procedures as well as stereotypical views of gender roles (Lewis and Simpson, 2010). Within these constrains professional women may exercise this choice in ways that are problematic for a society committed to gender equality (Eikhof, 2012). In the light of middle class fantasies of escaping the corporate rat-race of lives ruled by work, commuting and ever-alert smart phones (Bolchover, 2005; Bunting, 2004; Warhurst et al., 2009), such individual choices may appear logical, even liberating or empowering. The collective effect of such opting-out though is likely to be a loss of womens representation in powerful professional positions and a perpetuation and entrenchment of current gender inequalities and occupational segregation (Bradley, 2007; Eikhof et al., 2011). Despite being a growing group that are important to the labour supply (Pauldi, 2008; Austen and Ong, 2010), few studies have examined the employment experiences and choices of women over 45 (i.e. Armstrong-Stassen and Cameron, 2005; Moore, 2007; Phillipson, 2004; Still and Timms, 1999), nor have studies explored the reasons why such women retreat from organizational life (Trethewey, 2001),despite them being singled out as a unique group who have left organizations to set up their own businesses (Marshall, 1995; Rosin and Korabick, 1992; Weiler and Bernasek, 2001). This paper will aim to bridge the gap by exploring the transition of midlife women from organisational employment to self-employment. It will do so by using data from interviews with women who have moved out of organisations and set up their own businesses. The paper will contribute to the debate about women in the workplace in the following ways. The rst is that the focus on women in midlife is unique since previous research about women in organizations has rarely encompassed the experiences of this group of women. The second contribution is a focus on the experiences of midlife women when moving into self-employment. Third, the study will enable us to understand and contextualise better some of the issues facing midlife women in the workplace. Finally, it will help address what Broadbridge and Simpson (2011) have termed the current challenges in gender and management research of gender denial, the perception that gender problems in management have been solved. The paper will assist in Broadbridge and Simpsons (2011) call for the need to disseminate continuing and emerging gender differences and to conceptualize new and evolving forms of gendered hierarchies. In the rst section the paper highlights the key themes in the literature. The second section draws inductively on interviews with midlife women to show how and why they are moving out of organizations into self-employment. The third section examines the constraints faced by women in self-employment and concludes with the implications for organisations which arise from the issues raised in the paper.

Midlife women

187

GM 27,3

188

The experience of midlife Less is known about midlife than about other age period (Lachman, 2004). It has been described as the last unchartered territory in human development (Brim et al., 2004), despite being recognised as a critical benchmark for women (Adelmann et al., 1989). The malleability of the meaning behind the term midlife is evident from the differing opinions over how to describe it. The most common denition is the use of chronological markers, such as 40-65 years which are used to differentiate midlife from adulthood and old age (Rossi, 1985). However, some researchers have argued that the nature of changes in midlife may be multidimensional and multi-directional, with the boundaries being uid and constructed by society and the subjective experience of the individual (Lachman and James, 1997; Staudinger and Black, 2001) rather than being determined by chronological age (Brooks-Gunn and Kirsch, 1984). Denitions of midlife for women have often been based on reproductive ageing stages using indicators of hormonal changes, such as the menopause (Coney, 1994). While others have dened it as a time of womens changing role patterns and shifting responsibilities within their family (Gordon et al., 2002). Children may be leaving home, resulting in women having to cope with the empty nest syndrome (Adelmann et al., 1989; Bumpass and Aquilino, 1995; Putney and Bengtson, 2001). Womens concerns may shift from childcare to adult care, focusing on ageing parents, partners or other relatives (Campbell, 1983; OConnor and Wolfe, 1991; Ryff and Seltzter, 1996; Helsen and Wink, 1992; Bromberger and Matthews, 1996). Such a link between family and midlife, however, fails to explain midlife issues that occur through relationships beyond the conventional nuclear family. Earlier views of the midlife period suggest that a person alternates periods of building new life structures and changing existing ones (Levinson, 1986; Morris and Coxeter, 1995) and hence can experience a developmental crisis within this transition (Strenger and Ruttenberg, 2008). This leads to dening midlife as a contradictory position, between an achieved sense of condence and a fearful sense of danger and decline (Gullette, 1997, p. 235). Contrary to this, later research argues that crisis does not typify midlife (Reid and Willis, 1999; Stewart and Ostrove, 1998). Instead it is seen as a time of reassessment when a questioning of beliefs, values and assumptions may take place (Woods and Mitchell, 1979; Helsen and Wink, 1992). Midlife emerges from these denitions as being contingent on whether it is viewed as an opportunity for positive challenge and change or as a time of stagnation or decline, as much as on chronological age. Women and midlife Studies of older women have predominantly stressed their ageing as a problem (Krekula, 2007). Women older than 50 (Yerkes, 2010; Walker and Webster, 2007) are shown as being confronted with conicting expectations as the years of hard work, personal sacrice and dreams clash with the cold realities of organizational barriers (Pompper, 2011), and trying to nd balance and validity in their careers (Mainiero and Sullivan, 2005). According to Zemke et al. (2000), older women struggle to maintain their status, as they are expected to be fully qualied professionals, by this time, having achieved the highest level in their career as well as in their family lives (Strenger and Ruttenberg, 2008). Simultaneously, older women are described as being socially invisible (Arber and Ginn, 1991), and in working life they are not expected to be in their best mental and physical form anymore, nor supposed to have a great learning ability or be open to new

ideas (Yerkes, 2010). Thus, research has indicated that midlife is a time when women are facing challenges in organizational employment due to declining opportunities (Ackerman, 1990; Baltes et al., 1999), career stagnation (Beijan and Salomone, 1995), and job dissatisfaction as a result of stereotyping, bias in performance appraisal, lack of promotion, and low salaries (Pompper, 2011). As women grow older and attempt to move their careers forward they are also expected to conform to youth orientated constructions of femininity (Trethewey, 2001). Described as the double jeopardy of workplace ageism and sexism (Itzin and Phillipson, 1995), this has tended to result in studies focusing on midlife as a time of misery for women and resulted in the identity of older women being stigmatized (Hochschild, 1978). According to Pompper (2011) this denigration of older women leads to them experiencing anxiety, loss of self-esteem, and feeling hopeless about the future. Research has, however, begun to contradict this double standards theory of ageing, for example, Arber et al. (2003), highlight the need to raise awareness of the advantages older women bring rather than focus on the negative aspects of ageing. This is supported by Austen and Ong (2010), in a study of women in Australia, who emphasis that such an approach paints a one-sided picture of womens ageing as painful and ignores the new experiences and values that ageing brings. Earlier studies describe how women recalibrate their lives in midlife (Neugarten, 1968; Helsen and Wink, 1992; Borysenko, 1996; Moen and Wethington, 1999), to encompass their changing values. Although the outcomes of this rebalance or transition have not been delineated (Gordon et al., 2002), nor has consideration been given to what midlife women do once they have reassessed their lives. Motivations for self-employment Self-employment, referred to by Mallon and Cohen (2001) as a concept in transition, has been described by Halal (1997) as a major shift to an independent, more mature mode of employment (p. 15). While others remain keen to distinguish defensive self-employment, brought about by changing organizational conditions, from entrepreneurship as a calling (Schein, 1994). Studies have often referred to this as the push/pull dichotomy (Staber and Bogenhold, 1993; Cohen and Mallon, 1999; Hughes, 2003). Push is generally interpreted as responses to economic and labour market factors such as unemployment, redundancy and the perceived increasing insecurity of organizational positions (Granger et al., 1995). It is also used to encompass the various organizational actions and inactions which lead to an individual feeling that they can no longer work in that context (Mallon, 1998). Women have been found to be more likely than men to be pushed into self-employment due to the frustration they have experienced with inequalities in employment opportunities (Carter et al., 1988; Morris, 1998; Vinnicombe and Bank, 2003). Maitland and Wittenberg-Cox (2009) refer to this as gender asbestos, the gradual wearing down of women by organizations so that they look for alternative ways to productively exert their energies. The decision to leave is constructed as a passive destructive act (Arthur and Rousseau, 1996), and laced with despair (Green and Cassell, 1996). Self-employment is seen as a coping strategy to help women deal with the issues they face in organisations (Marlow and Carter, 2004). In contrast, Pull is about the potential for greater independence, exibility and choice on offer within the discourse of self-employment (Hakim, 1989). Anderson et al. (2010), found that women partners in a consultancy rm explained their decision to leave

Midlife women

189

GM 27,3

190

in terms of personal choice rather than in relation to the constraints and barriers the organization put in their way. A similar conclusion has been proposed about female retail executives (Broadbridge, 2010). Authors do, however, differ in the extent to which they see push or pull as the most important factor, and in their assessment of self-employment, as a subordination response or an economic panacea (Mallon and Cohen, 2001). Such analyses appear to be overly simplistic and stereotypical. It is more appropriate to view these motivations as multifaceted in order to understand the dilemmas faced (Patterson and Mavin, 2009). Women themselves commonly cite market opportunities, family commitments, career frustrations, achievement and independence needs or a feeling of no other alternative as motivations for their career transitions (Mallon and Cohen, 2001). Recent research has examined the double-edged sword of the twenty rst century workplace in terms of trends and gender equality and indicates evidence of the hidden gender aspects of the spreading of knowledge work, ICT and work-life balance policies on the careers of women (Eikhof, 2012). Thus, highlighting the complexity of womens working lives. Most of the studies have not explored whether the age of the person going into self-employment is a determining variable, assuming that women are a homogeneous group. As Marlow and Carter (2004), state, there has been a tendency to treat women as a universal term denoting an undifferentiated group who engage with specic areas of enterprise that reect traditional female occupation (p. 140). This is supported by ONeil et al. (2008), who emphasis that male-dened constructions of work and career success continue to dominate organizational research and practice (p. 727). The exception to this is the study by Walker and Webster (2007) which indicates that self-employment is a reactive rather than a proactive decision for both older women and men, although the study also found that women were less inclined than men to actively seek self-employment as their employment option of choice. The study is, however, open to criticism in that it focuses generally on men and women of all ages so it is unable to make specic conclusions about midlife women. As Cohen and Mallon (1999) argue what is needed is a more holistic perspective which captures the rich and historic interweaving of person, structural and discursive motives which may propel an individual towards self-employment. In this paper in order to contribute to the growing debate about self-employment and address the gap in the research of midlife women we examine the following, rst, how midlife women account for their transition from organizations to self-employment; second, why they opted for self-employment rather than simply changing organizations; third their experience of self-employment. Finally we discuss the implications of the research for organizations and individuals. Method This paper is based on semi-structured interviews (n 100), with women between the ages of 46 and 60 who have moved into self-employment from organizational employment. The use of chronological age to differentiate midlife from adulthood and old age is the most common approach (Rossi, 1985) and the age range used in this study reects the age cohort three (46-60), used in ONeil and Bilimoria (2005), study of womens career development phases. The sampling approach taken can be described as non-probability, the purpose of which is not to establish a random or representative sample but rather to identify those

people who have information about the process (Hornby and Symon, 1994, p. 169). Thus, the sample was constructed through UK professional and informal networks. A snowball sampling technique (Atkinson and Flint, 2001) was used so that women who agreed to participate recommended other potential respondents. One danger of snowballing is the potential for cloned respondents with each person at risk of being much like the next in terms of traits, interests or patterns. To prevent this 15 separate snowballing chains were launched, each starting from a different networking source. Interviews were conducted between January 2009-March 2011 and were seen as the most promising way to gain access to narratives about employment states (Kvale and Brinkman, 2009; Wengraf, 2001). The interviews explored how women were experiencing midlife, their relationship with organizations, their views of organizations and career success, and their reasons for leaving employment in an organization, why they opted for self-employment and how they were experiencing it. In voicing their own perspectives the women were able to provide their own views of womens careers, organizational experience and self-employment (Mallon and Cohen, 2001). About 60 percent of the interviews were conducted in person and the rest were conducted by phone. Interviews ranged in duration from one to two hours and were recorded and transcribed. Eisenhardts (1989) rules were followed in that interview notes were developed within 24 hours, which included all data from the interview. Each set of interview notes was concluded with the overall impressions of the interviewer. NVivo (computer-aided qualitative data analysis software) was employed as a means of organizing data and maintaining links between eld notes and recordings. A triangulated methodology was used to validate the data (Pettigrew, 1990). This included the in-depth interviews; documentary data (e.g. strategy and policy documents and business plans); and direct observation (e.g. attendance at formal and informal meetings). NVivo was also used to aid thematic analyses (King, 1998) and as a means of mapping evolving relationships between themes. Several iterations of thematic analysis proceeded. A key aspect of analysis was a reexive approach to the analytical process itself, particularly focusing on the way in which understandings emerged, were claried and became constructed in the process of writing this article. Findings The mean age of participants was 51.9 and the mean number of years self-employment was 5.5. The majority was married (63 percent), and had children (70 percent). Most (75 percent) had a degree and/or vocational qualications. As organizational employees, the women had worked in a variety of sectors including hotel and catering management, sales and marketing, training and development, journalism, technology, health care, graphic design and public relations. Over half (52 percent) now worked in the management consultancy sector, 18 percent were in the nancial sector, 19 percent in the technology sector, 16 percent in the education sector, and 5 percent were employed in the manufacturing sector. Over 70 percent operated from home. The majority were in micro businesses, that is employing less than ve staff. Two broad themes emerged in the interviews which were related to the push-pull theory. The rst was the negative organizational experience of some of the women which had caused dissatisfaction and disenchantment and they felt as if they were being pushed out of organizations. In such cases, self-employment was seen as the only

Midlife women

191

GM 27,3

next step. The second theme was changes triggered by a positive proactive choice to move into self-employment based on the women reassessing their life and identifying what they wanted from it. For such women the transition to self-employment was seen as the next best step. Transition to self-employment as a result of dissatisfaction and disenchantment with organizational employment Nearly half (n 45) of the women stated that they had moved to self-employment because they were dissatised and disenchanted with the organization in which they had worked. They said they were being penalised because of their appearance and sexuality, thus reinforcing the concept of a double jeopardy which Duncan and Loretto (2004) describe as gendered ageism. As one interviewee said:
I was told that due to a major reorganization there was a need to bring on [promote] younger people and I should not expect any further promotion. I never intended to set up my own business but was pushed to get out of a job which was leading nowhere and where my age was against me.

192

For a number of women, the issue was that they felt that they were no longer acceptable to the organization. As one woman said:
Despite 20 years experience in my eld I ended up coaching younger colleagues to go out to see clients who I previously would have gone to meet. I had to leave as I was losing sight of who and what I was. It was desperation that led me to set up my own company.

For these women the decision to leave resulted from an unwillingness to tolerate the lack of recognition and value afforded to them. Leaving the organization in such cases was described as a means of regaining a sense of oneself. Data from the current study shows that motivations which were pushing women to transition to self-employment centred on aspects of frustration with the working environments in organisations, such as a perceived lack of opportunity for advancement or not being valued. These were motivators that the women believed they had little or no inuence or control to change. The majority of these women had set up their own business in management consultancy and were operating as sole traders from home. Transition to self-employment as a result of recalibration Contrary to previous studies there are also older women who are proactively moving into self-employment with enthusiasm, energy and what has been referred to as the enterprising self (Rose, 1989), with a heightened vitality (Mead, 1975). For those women who made the choice to move (n 55), without feeling pushed, it was an exciting opportunity which offered them autonomy, authenticity and the chance to use their experience and knowledge in practice. These women were operating in a variety of different sectors and the majority included two to ve employees. The desire for autonomy was framed as one of the main motivators for moving into self-employment. One interviewee said:
There is a freedom that comes from your own business. Being willing to speak your mind and feeling liberated [. . .] I deliberately chose to set up my own business as my next career move.

Many women felt that by starting their own business, they were able to be true to themselves and bring aspects of themselves into their work lives. As one woman said:

The only place where I can be truly authentic is running my own business and creating a culture of empathy.

Midlife women

One of the most insightful ndings was such women saw self-employment as a positive next step in their career, in order to do something that they felt was of value to themselves and society. As one interviewee said:
I felt the need to use my experience, life skills, and networks in a way that would be of value to others.

193

These women described how they had changed the basis of their self perception at midlife. As one woman commented:
I feel more condent in my own skin. I like and respect who I am and what I do. I care much less about what people think. . .having been through the traumas life throws at you. I still have so many new things left to conquer.

Thus, the women emphasized their own competence, self-esteem and condence, which contradicts the view that women resign themselves to their own fate and that it is, difcult to quit ones job, let alone ones whole profession, and few in midlife, saddled with mortgage and, perhaps, tuition payments, have the fortitude to do so (Gardner, 2002, B2). The question arises about why the women were not simply looking for positions in other organizations but instead opted for self-employment. Four factors were identied during the interviews. First, a desire to nd an employment context which offered the opportunity to use their experience and knowledge. Second, the need to gain recognition and feel valued about what they did. Third, the need for autonomy and nally, the data showed that midlife women were looking for success, on their own terms, outside of organizations in order to succeed personally and professionally. They talked about taking stock of what they valued and considered important in their work and discarding those aspects with low importance and low meaningfulness. The data showed that they were reassessing their lives by moving into self-employment. Challenges of self-employment Having made the decision to move to self-employment, all the women mentioned that they derived a sense of accomplishment and satisfaction from being their own boss and doing work which was aligned to their own values. However, the women also reexively identied the risks of being self-employed. The majority of women (70 percent), in the current study stated that they had directly experienced a lack of nancial support from the banks. As one respondent said nding funding was a problem for women who were trying to start their own business, It was only the nancial support from my partner that has helped me keep the business going. This supports previous research which has found that obtaining banking nance can affect womens potential to become successful entrepreneurs (Gill and Ganesh, 2007) and that women starting businesses often have more difculties than men in relation to basic aspects, such as access to nance and, at a more fundamental level, being taken seriously as a business operator (Mirchandani, 1999; Still and Guerin, 1991; Still and Walker, 2006). The women, in the current study, also perceived self-employment as having personal and psychological risks. The women described making the change from the relative

GM 27,3

certainty of being a paid employee to being self-employed as an enormous emotional shift. As one interviewee said:
Although it is absolutely what I want to do it has been a massive upheaval in terms of working on my own and trying to establish a business during an economic recession. It has caused me a lot of sleepless nights.

194

Such risks have been found to result in womens businesses starting small and continuing to be very small and often undercapitalized (Marlow and Carter, 2004). The current study did, however, nd that women felt that they had the support to help deal with the risks they faced, particularly through businesswomens networks and more informal networks which were available face-to-face and online. This is contrary to previous studies which found that women going into business do not have support (Chell and Baines, 1998; Jurik, 1998). Discussion In this paper we addressed three related questions, rst, how midlife women account for their transition from organizations to self-employment? Second, why they opted for self-employment rather than simply changing organizations? Third what has been their experience of self-employment? The ndings reveal that self-employment offers the prospect of opportunities for midlife women. The current study did show that some women do feel pushed into self-employment due to the barriers they face in organizations. However, the study goes further than this and in contradiction to previous research (Walker and Webster, 2007; Kolvereid, 1996) shows that midlife women see business ownership as a positive employment option. The data indicates that midlife women desire to succeed both professionally and personally, and see self-employment as a way to achieve these aspirations. The women describe self-employment as giving them opportunities for autonomy, to be authentic and to build on their experience and apply their capabilities. They perceive midlife as a time to recalibrate their work lives; a period of reection to reassess if they are accomplishing what they set out to do and what they can still do. Whether moving into self-employment had enabled the women to recalibrate their working lives was dependent on how successful they felt they had been. The ndings suggest that most of the women measured their success in terms of self-fulllment and achievement of their personal goals, success was measured internally, in terms of personal growth, applying their skills and experience and being true to their own values, which one woman described as maintaining a person value system, rather than externally in quantitative measures. Those women who had all felt pulled to self-employee spoke of achieving the success they had hoped for. This was in comparison to only half of the women who had felt pushed from organizational life. Thus, indicating that motivations behind the transition to self-employment may have an impact on the success of women entrepreneurs. This study does not completely support the picture of midlife womens ageing as painful and negative. As Krekula (2007), illustrates the double standard assumption of ageing starts from a limited understanding of the process of ageing. It focuses on ageing as physical changes and ignores the life experience, energy and enthusiasm that older people bring to organisations. There is a picture of midlife women appearing which shows them in need of and seeking relevant, rewarding and stimulating career

opportunities and being recognised for the condence and experience they bring to organizations. Our ndings contradict the myth that as women age they have less to offer organizations. Indeed this study shows quite the opposite that as women age they have more to contribute to organizational life. The challenge is getting society and organizations to recognise the experience of these women. Implications for organizations Women moving out of organizations may provide a solution to the organizational barriers they face. However, it might also operate as a safety valve that allows organizational practices to remain as they are because it relieves the pressure for organizations to change. The tendency for women to create their own businesses instead of staying with organizations that do not offer them opportunities and recognition is likely to continue if organizational practices do not change. Silence about midlife women leaving organizations perpetuates high costs for both the organization and the individual involved. There is a need for dialogue about it. Organizations need to address the negative and discriminatory perceptions about midlife women. They need to recognize the trend towards more, not fewer, older women in the workplace and value the experience, skills and knowledge they bring. Despite evidence to the contrary the view that the problem of gender has been solved in the workplace still needs to be challenged (Broadbridge and Simpson, 2011). Implications for women The women in this study had substantial experience in organizations before launching out on their own and had time to develop their managerial and leadership skills and to develop networks that yielded valuable contacts during business start-up. Perhaps most importantly they had time to develop their competence and self-condence, a sense of purpose about their career and clarity about professional and personal values and priorities. Yet the issues women found in making the transition from an organization to self-employment appear to have changed little in the past ten years (Moore and Buttner, 1997). Financing the business through external sources, especially banks, continues to be a challenge for women entrepreneurs. Establishing their performance capability is time consuming and often at the cost of their personal life, which means that an emotional support system is important. For most women in this study, support came from a spouse or partner. The women repeatedly cautioned those interested in starting their own business not be to mesmerized by a dream and understand that things are changing rapidly. As one women said:
Todays marketplace is changing quickly and a key success factor is the ability to dene the viable opportunities. This is not an economy that is expanding. You are always in a situation where you are competing with people who are out of work and who will try their own businesses and fail in a year.

Midlife women

195

Thus, women who are considering leaving organisations need to consider the implications of setting up on their own and the challenges they will face. Future research This study was designed to guide further study, and inform organizational practice. Studies using longitudinal and multivariate methods are needed to examine whether

GM 27,3

196

the patterns identied are robust and whether they generalize to other midlife cohorts. One essential area for research is to study midlife women in other cultures and in different occupational contexts. Some work has been done with African-American women and Native American women (Barbee and Bauer, 1988; Brown et al., 2005). How various ethnic groups of women experience midlife remains poorly understood as a result of there being little published work about women from ethnic groups. Whether these ndings also apply to women from other racial or ethnic groups or to non-professional women also needs attention.
References Ackerman, R. (1990), Career development and transactions of middle aged women, Psychology of Women Quarterly, Vol. 14, pp. 513-30. Adelmann, P., Antonucci, T., Cohan, S. and Coleman, L. (1989), Empty nest, cohort and employment in the well-being of midlife women, Sex roles, Vol. 20, pp. 173-89. Anderson, D., Vinnicombe, S. and Singh, V. (2010), Women partners leaving the rm, choice, what choice?, Gender in Management: An International Journal, Vol. 25, pp. 170-83. Arber, S. and Ginn, J. (1991), Gender and Later Life, A Sociological Analysis of Resources and Constraints, Sage, London. Arber, S., Davidson, K. and Ginn, J. (2003), Gender and Ageing, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. Armstrong-Stassen, M. and Cameron, S. (2005), Factors related to the career satisfaction of older managerial and professional women, Career Development International, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 203-15. Arthur, M.B. and Rousseau, D.M. (Eds) (1996), The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era, Oxford University Press, Oxford. Atkinson, R. and Flint, J. (2001), Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations, Snowball Research Strategies, Social Research Update, Vol. 33, pp. 1-4. Austen, S. and Ong, R. (2010), The employment transitions of mid-life women, health and care effects, Age and Society, Vol. 30, pp. 207-27. Baltes, P., Staudinger, U. and Lindenberger, U. (1999), Lifespan psychology, theory and application to intellectual functioning, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 50, pp. 471-507. Banyard, K. (2010), The Equality Illusion: The Truth about Women and Men Today, Faber and Faber, London. Barbee, E. and Bauer, J. (1988), Ageing and life experiences of low-income, middle-aged African-American and caucasian women, The Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, Vol. 20, pp. 5-17. Beijan, D. and Salomone, P. (1995), Understanding mid-life career renewal, implications for counselling, Career Development Quarterly, Vol. 44, pp. 52-63. Bolchover, D. (2005), The Living Dead, Capstone, Chichester. Borysenko, J. (1996), A Womans Book of Life, The Biology, Psychology and Spirituality of the Feminine Cycle, Riverhead, New York, NY. Bradley, H. (2007), Gender, Polity Press, Cambridge. Brim, O., Ryff, C. and Kessler, R. (Eds) (2004), Ambition, How We Manage Success and Failure Throughout Our Live, Basic Books, New York, NY, pp. 37-63. Broadbridge, A. (2010), Choice or constraint? Tensions in female retail executives career narratives, Gender in Management, An International Journal, Vol. 25, pp. 244-60.

Broadbridge, A. and Simpson, R. (2011), 25 years on, reecting on the past and looking to the future in gender and management research, British Journal of Management, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 470-83. Bromberger, J. and Matthews, K. (1996), A longitudinal study of the effects of pessimism, trait anxiety, and life stress on depressive symptoms in middle-aged women, Psychology and Ageing, Vol. 11, pp. 207-13. Brooks-Gunn, J. and Kirsch, B. (1984), Life events and the boundaries of midlife for women, in Baruch, G. and Brook-Gunn, J. (Eds), Women in Midlife, Basic Books, New York, NY, pp. 31-68. Brown, C., Matthews, K. and Bromberger, J. (2005), How do African American and caucasian women view themselves at midlife, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 35 No. 10, pp. 2057-75. Bumpass, L. and Aquilino, W. (1995), A Social Map of Midlife, Family and Work Over the Midlife Course, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI. Bunting, M. (2004), Willing Slaves, Harper Collins, London. Calais, M., Smircich, L., and Boume, K.A. (2009), Extending the boundries: reframing entrepreneurship as social change through feminist perspectives, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 34 No. 3, pp. 552-69. Campbell, S. (1983), The fty year old women and midlife stress, International Journal of Aging and Human Development, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 295-307. Carter, S., Shaw, E., Wilson, F. and Lam, W. (2007), Gender, entrepreneurship and bank lending: the criteria and processes used by bank loan ofcers in assessing applications, Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 427-44. Carter, S., Cannon, T., Rosa, P., Baddon, L. and McClure, R. (1988), Female Entrepreneurship, Scottish Enterprise Foundation, Stirling. Chell, E. and Baines, S. (1998), Does gender affect business performance? A study of microbusiness in business services in the UK, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 117-36. Cohen, L. and Mallon, M. (1999), The transition from organisational employment to portfolio working, perceptions of boundarylessness, Work, Employment & Society, Vol. 13, pp. 329-52. Coney, S. (1994), The Menopause Industry: How the Medical Establishment Exploits Women, Hunter House, Alameda, CA. Curran, J. and Blackburn, R.A. (2001), Older people and the enterprise society: age and self-employment propensities, Work Employment and Society, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 889-902. Duncan, C. and Loretto, W. (2004), Never the right age? Gender and age-based discrimination in employment, Gender, Work and Organization, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 95-115. Eikhof, D.R. (2012), A double-edged sword: twenty rst century workplace trends and gender equality, Gender in Management: An International Journal, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 7-22. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989), Building theories from case study research, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, pp. 532-50. Gardner, H. (2002), Good work, well done, a psychological study, The Chronicle of Higher Education, Vol. 22, February, pp. B1-10. Gill, R. and Ganesh, S. (2007), Empowerment, constraint, and the entrepreneurial self, a study of white women entrepreneurs, Journal of Applied Communication Research, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 268-93.

Midlife women

197

GM 27,3

198

Gordon, B., Beatty, J. and Whelan-Berry, K. (2002), The midlife transition of professional women with children, Women in Management Review, Vol. 17 No. 7, pp. 328-41. Granger, B., Stanworth, J. and Stanworth, C. (1995), Self-employment career dynamics, the case of unemployment push in UK book publishing, Work, Employment & Society, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 499-516. Green, E. and Cassell, C. (1996), Women managers, gendered cultural processes and organizational change, Gender Work and Organization, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 168-78. Greene, F. and Storey, D. (2002), Greys lead the way in enterprises, Financial Times, Vol. 14, p. 29. Gullette, M.M. (1997), Declining to Decline: Cultural Combat and the Politics of Midlife, University Press, Charlottesville, VA. Hakim, C. (1989), New recruits to self-employment in the 1980s, Employment Gazette, June, pp. 286-97. Halal, W. (1997), The rise of the knowledge entrepreneur, The Futurist, November-December, pp. 13-16. Harding, R., Cowling, M. and Ream, M. (2004), Female Entrepreneurship, Achieving the Vision, British Chamber of Commerce, London. Helsen, R. and Wink, P. (1992), Personality change in women from the 40s to the early 50s, Psychology and Ageing, Vol. 7, pp. 46-55. Hochschild, A.R. (1978), The Unexpected Community, Portrait of an Old Age Subculture, University of California Press, London. Hornby, P. and Symon, G. (1994), Tracer studies, in Cassell, C. and Symond, G. (Eds), Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research, a Practical Guide, Sage, London. Hughes, K.D. (2003), Pushed or pulled? Womens entry into self-employment and small business ownership, Gender, Work and Organization, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 433-54. Itzin, C. and Phillipson, C. (1995), Gendered ageism, a double jeopardy for women in organizations, in Itzin, C. and Newman, J. (Eds), Gender, Culture and Organizational Change, Putting Theory into Practice, Routledge, London, pp. 81-90. Jurik, N.C. (1998), Getting away and getting by: the experiences of self-employed homeworkers, Work and Occupations, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 7-35. King, N. (1998), Template analysis, in Symon, G. and Cassell, C. (Eds), Qualitative Methods and Analysis in Organizational Research, Sage, London. Kolvereid, L. (1996), Predictions of employment status choice intentions, Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 47-57. Krekula, C. (2007), The intersection of age and gender, reworking gender theory and social gerontology, Current Sociology, Vol. 55, pp. 155-70. Kvale, S. and Brinkman, S. (2009), Interviews, Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing, 2nd ed., Sage, London. Lachman, M. (2004), Development in midlife, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 55, pp. 305-31. Lachman, M. and James, J. (1997), Charting the course of midlife development: an overview, in Lachman, M. and James, J. (Eds), Multiple Paths of Midlife Development, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. Levinson, D. (1986), A conception of adult development, American Psychologist, Vol. 41 No. 1, pp. 3-13. Lewis, P. and Simpson, R. (2010), Meritocracy, difference and merit: womens experiences of advantage and disadvantage at work, Gender in Management, Vol. 25 No. 3 (special issue).

Mainiero, L. and Sullivan, S. (2005), Kaleidoscope careers: an alternative explanation for the opt-out revolution, Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 106-203. Maitland, A. and Wittenberg-Cox, A. (2009), Why Women Mean Business, Wiley, New York, NY. Mallon, M. (1998), Opting for a portfolio career: why do it?, Personnel Review, Vol. 27 No. 5. Mallon, M. and Cohen, L. (2001), Time for a change? Womens accounts of the move from organizational careers to self-employment, British Journal of Management, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 217-31. Marlow, S. and Carter, S. (2004), Accounting for change, professional status, gender disadvantage and self-employment, Women in Management Review, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 5-17. Marlow, S. and McAdam, M. (2012), Gender and entrepreneurship: advancing debate and challenging myths: exploring the mystery of the under-performing female entrepreneur, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research (in press). Marlow, S. and Patton, D. (2005), All credit to men? Entrepreneurship, nance and gender, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, Vol. 29 No. 6, pp. 717-35. Marshall, J. (1995), Women Managers Moving On, Exploring Career and Life Choices, Routledge, London. Mattis, M. (2004), Women entrepreneurs, out from under the glass ceiling, Women in Management Review, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 154-63. Mead, M. (1975), Male and Female, A Study of the Sexes in a Changing World, Morrow and Co., London. Mirchandani, K. (1999), Feminist insight on gendered work, new directions in research on women and entrepreneurship, Gender, Work and Organization, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 224-35. Moen, P. and Wethington, E. (1999), Midlife development in a life course context, in Willis, S. and Reid, J. (Eds), Life in the Middle, Psychological and Social Development in Middle Age, Academic Press, San Diego, CA. Moore, D.P. and Buttner, H.E. (1997), Women Entrepreneurs, Sage, London. Moore, S. (2007), Age as a factor dening older womens experience of labour market participation in the UK, Industrial Law Journal, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 383-7. Morris, B. and Coxeter, R. (1995), Executive women confront midlife crisis, Fortune, Vol. 132 No. 6, pp. 60-86. Morris, D. and Mallier, T. (2003), Employment of older people in the European Union, Labour: Review of Labour Relations and Industrial Economics, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 623-48. Morris, M. (1998), My brilliant career, it isnt only love thats sweeter the second time around, More, Vol. 1, pp. 80-4. Neugarten, B. (1968), Middle Age and Ageing, Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL. OConnor, D. and Wolfe, D. (1991), From crises to growth at midlife, changes in personal paradigms, Journal of Organizational Behaviour, Vol. 12, pp. 323-40. ONeil, D. and Bilimoria, D. (2005), Womens career development phases, idealism, endurance, and reinvention, Career Development International, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 168-89. ONeil, D., Hopkins, M. and Bilimoria, D. (2008), Womens careers at the start of the 21st century, patterns and paradoxes, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 80, pp. 727-43. Paludi, M. (Ed.) (2008), The Psychology of Women at Work, Challenges and Solutions for Our Female Workforce, Praeger Publishers, Westport, CT. Patterson, N. and Mavin, S. (2009), Women entrepreneurs: jumping the corporate ship and gaining new wings, International Small Business Journal, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 173-92.

Midlife women

199

GM 27,3

200

Pettigrew, A. (1990), Longitudinal eld research on change: theory and practice, Organizational Science, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 267-80. Phillipson, C. (2004), Review article, older workers and retirement, critical perspectives on the research literature and policy implications, Social Policy and Society, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 189-95. Platman, K. (2004), Portfolio careers and the search for exibility in later life, Work Employment Society, Vol. 18, pp. 573-99. Pompper, D. (2011), Fifty years later, mid-career women of color against the glass ceiling in communications organizations, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 464-86. Putney, N. and Bengtson, V. (2001), Families, intergenerational relationships and kin keeping in midlife, in Lachman, M. (Ed.), Handbook of Midlife Development, Wiley, New York, NY, pp. 28-70. Reid, J. and Willis, S. (1999), Middle age: new thoughts, new directions, in Willis, S. and Reid, J. (Eds), Life in the Middle: Psychological and Social Development in Middle Age, Academic Press, San Diego, CA. Rose, N. (1989), Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self, Routledge, London. Rosin, H.M. and Korabick, K. (1992), Corporate ight of women managers, moving from ction to fact, Women in Management Review, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 31-5. Rossi, A. (1985), Gender and the Life Course, Aldine, New York, NY. Ryff, C. and Seltzter, M. (1996), The Parental Experience in Midlife, Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL. Schein, E.H. (1994), Commentary: what is an entrepreneur?, Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 87-8. Singh, G. and DeNoble, A. (2003), Early retirees as the next generation of entrepreneurs, Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 207-26. Staber, U. and Bogenhold, D. (1993), Self-employment, a study of seventeen OECD countries, Industrial Relations Journal, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 126-37. Staudinger, U. and Black, S. (2001), A view of midlife development from lifespan theory, in Lachman, M. (Ed.), Handbook of Midlife Development, Wiley, New York, NY, pp. 3-39. Stewart, A. and Ostrove, J. (1998), Womens personality in middle age, gender, history, and midcourse corrections, and womens well-being in midlife, American Psychologist, Vol. 53 No. 11, pp. 1185-93. Still, L. and Guerin, C. (1991), Barriers facing self-employed women, the Australian experience, Women in Management Review, Vol. 6 No. 6, pp. 1-10. Still, L. and Timms, W. (1999), The rst wave the older woman manager, a holistic perspective, International Journal of Employment Studies, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 81-102. Still, L. and Walker, E. (2006), The self-employed woman owner and her business, an Australian prole, Women in Management Review, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 294-310. Strenger, C. and Ruttenberg, A. (2008), The existential necessity of midlife change, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 86 No. 2, pp. 82-90. Terjesen, S. (2005), Senior women managers transition to entrepreneurship, leveraging embedded career capital, Career Development International, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 246-59. Trethewey, A. (2001), Reproducing and resisting the master narrative of decline, midlife professional womens experience of aging, Management Communication Quarterly, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 183-226. Vinnicombe, S. and Bank, J. (2003), Women with Attitude, Routledge, London.

Walker, E. and Webster, B. (2007), Gender, age and self-employment, some things change, some things stay the same, Women in Management Review, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 122-35. Warhurst, C., Hurrell, S., Gilbert, K., Nickson, D., Commander, J. and Calder, I. (2009), Just mothers, really? Role stretch and low pay among female classroom assistants, in Bolton, S. and Houlihan, M. (Eds), Work Matters: Critical Reections on Contemporary Work, Palgrave, Basingstoke. Weiler, S. and Bernasek, A. (2001), Dodging the glass ceiling? Networks and the new wave of women entrepreneurs, Social Science Journal, Vol. 38, pp. 85-105. Wengraf, T. (2001), Qualitative Research Interviewing, Biographic Narrative and Semi-structured Methods, Sage, London. Woods, N. and Mitchell, E. (1979), Womens images of midlife, observations from seattle midlife womens health study, Health Care for Women International, Vol. 18 No. 5, pp. 439-45. Yerkes, M. (2010), Diversity in work, the heterogeneity of womens employment patterns, Gender, Work and Organisation, Vol. 17 No. 6, pp. 696-720. Zemke, R., Raines, C. and Filipczak, B. (2000), Generations at Work, Managing the Clash of Veterans, Boomers, Xers, and Nexters in Your Workplace, AMACOM, New York, NY. Further reading Dey, I. (1993), Qualitative Data Analysis: A User-Friendly Guide for Social Scientists, Routledge, London. Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory, Strategies for Qualitative Research, Aldine Publishing, Chicago, IL. Miller, K. (2009), Organizational Communication, Approaches and Processes, 5th ed., Wadsworth Cengage Learning, Boston, MA. About the author Dr Julie Hodges is a Senior Lecturer and Director of the MBA Programmes at Newcastle University Business School. Prior to joining Newcastle she worked at Durham University Business School. Before joining the academy in 2006, she worked for over 20 years in international business with companies such as PwC, the British Council, Vertex and RBS. Her areas of research include sustaining change in organisations; and midlife women in business. Julie Hodges can be contacted at: [email protected]

Midlife women

201

To purchase reprints of this article please e-mail: [email protected] Or visit our web site for further details: www.emeraldinsight.com/reprints

You might also like