Operative Obstetrics
Operative Obstetrics
FORCEPS DELIVERY termination of the 2nd stage of labor for any condition
Components: threatening the mother or the fetus that is likely to be
1. Blade relieved by delivery
a. Fenestrated- hole, Simpson, Kielland
b. Solid- permits a firmer hold on the fetal head, Tucker, Maternal Indications
McClaine Heart disease
2. Curves Pulmonary injury or compromise
a. Cephalic curve- conforms to the shape of the fetal head Intrapartum infection
b. Pelvic curve- conforms to the shape of the pelvic canal Neurological complications
Exhaustion
Classification (AAP & ACG 2003) Prolonged 2nd stage of labor
Outlet Forceps Scalp is visible through the introitus
(head >+2) without separating the labia Fetal Indications
Fetal skull has reached the pelvic Umbilical cord prolapse
floor Premature separation of the placenta
Non-reassuring FHR
Sagittal suture is in AP diameter, ROA
or LOA or OP position Prerequisite for Successful Forceps Application
Fetal head is at or on the perineum 1. The head must be engaged
Rotation does not exceed 45o 2. The fetus must present as vertex or by face with chin
Low Forceps anterior
Leading point of the fetal skull is at 3. The position of the fetal head must be precisely known
station >+2 and not on the pelvic floor 4. The cervix must be completely dilated
1. rotation < 45o 5. The membranes must be ruptured
2. rotation > 45o 6. There must be no CPD
Mid Forceps Station above +2 but head is
Preparation for Forceps Delivery
engaged
Anesthesia- pudendal, regional, or IV ketamine
High Forceps Not included in the classification (not Empty bladder
done anymore) Identification of exact position
o Sagittal sutures
Incidence o Two fontanels
Decline in operative vaginal deliveries, increase in CS
Forceps: 17.7 % 4 % Forceps Application
CS: 16.5 % 22.9 % BPD (biparietal diameter) corresponds to the greatest
distance between approximately applied blades
Epidural Anesthesia Long axis of blades corresponds to occipito-mental diameter
Failure of spontaneous rotation to an OA position Concave margin of blades
o 27 %- persistent OP o Towards sagittal suture- OA
o 8 %- persistent OP in those not given epidural o Towards face- OP
anesthesia
Traction
Slowing of 2nd stage of labor Gentle, intermittent, horizontal
Decreased maternal expulsive efforts As vulva is directed by occiput, do episiotomy
2-fold increased rates in forceps delivery Handles are gradually elevated as parietal bones emerge
Apply traction only with each uterine contraction
Functions of Forceps When head appears, remove the forceps and deliver the
May be used as a tractor, rotator or both fetus in the usual manner
Simpson- to deliver a fetus with molded head to nullipara
Tucker-McLaine- for a fetus with rounded head multipara Maternal Morbidity
Keilland- for rotation
Elective outlet forceps delivery with rotations not >45o
o No increase in maternal morbidity
Indications
Maternal injury increases with rotation >45o
MARY YVETTE ALLAIN TINA RALPH SHERYL BART HEINRICH PIPOY KC JAM CECILLE DENESSE VINCE HOOPS CES XTIAN LAINEY RIZ KIX EZRA GOLDIE BUFF MONA AM MAAN ADI KC
PENG KARLA ALPHE AARON KYTH ANNE EISA KRING CANDY ISAY MARCO JOSHUA FARS RAIN JASSIE MIKA SHAR ERIKA MACKY VIKI JOAN PREI KATE BAM AMS HANNAH MEMAY PAU
RACHE ESTHER JOEL GLENN TONI
Subject: Obstetrics 2
Topic: Operative Obstetrics
Page 2 of 4
Increased blood transfusions o Anterior placement will aggravate cervical spine
o Most common morbidity secondary to hemorrhage extension
o 6.1% vacuum extraction o Asymmetric placement –worsen asynclitism
o 4.2% forceps delivery
o 1.4% CS 2. Full circumference of cup should be palpated prior to
1. Lacerations and Episiotomy traction
Bigger episiotomies o Avoids entrapment of maternal soft tissue
More 3rd and 4th degree lacerations 3. Gradual increase in suction pressure
o 13% outlet forceps 4. Traction
o 22% low forceps with <45̊ rotation o Intermittent and coordinated with maternal expulsive
o 44% low forceps with >45̊ rotation
o 37% mild forceps Relative Contraindications
2. Urinary and Rectal Incontinence Face or other non-vertex presentation
Lower febrile morbidity due to metritis secondary to Extreme prematurity –intracranial hemorrhage
forceps than CS Fetal coagulopathies –hemorrhage
Known macrosomia
Perinatal morbidity Following recent scalp blood sampling
Complications Vacuum % Forceps %
Complications
APGAR 1min <7 10 10 1. Scalp lacerations and bruising
APGAR 5min <8 2 2 2. Cephalhematomas, intracranial hemorrhage
Cephalhematoma 2.15 10-Jul 3. Neonatal Jaundice (due to hematoma formation)
Caput Succenadaeum 3.4 14 4. Subconjunctival hemorrhage
Facial mark/injury 2 18 5. Clavicular fracture
6. Shoulder dystocia
Erb palsy 1 0 7. Erb palsy
Fractured clavicle 2 0 8. Retinal hemorrhage
Retinal hemorrhage 16-37 8 9. Fetal death
Abducens nerve injury 3.2 2.4
Elevated bilirubin 20 10 CAESAREAN SECTION
Infant stay 3.4 3.1 Incidence
From 4.5 % (1965) to 25% (1988)
Trial vs. Failed Forceps
Trial Forceps 2002- 26.1%
o Attempt at operative vaginal delivery is anticipated to be
difficult
o OR and staff are ready for immediate CS
1. Few doctors know how to peform forceps
o If satisfactory applications or forceps cannot be
2. CS technique becomes easy – available anesthesia
achieved, abandon procedure and proceed to CS
Failed Forceps
o The assumption is vaginal/forceps is adequate to 3. CS by request
deliver baby
o If unexpectedly, delivery is found to be too difficult, ACOG Recommendation for 2010
proceed to CS Decrease CS rate – 15.5% for nulliparas at 37 weeks or
o Staff and OR not necessarily prepared more with singleton cephalic presentation
VACUUM EXTRACTION Increase VBAC (Vaginal Birth After CS) rate – 37% at 37
Advantages over Forceps weeks or more after one prior to low transverse CS
1. Avoidance of insertion of space occupying steel blades
within the vagina of positioning precisely over the fetal head Causes of Increases in CS
2. ability to rotate fetal head without impinging on maternal soft 1. Reduced parity
tissues
3. less intracranial pressure during traction 2. Older women are having children
Indications and prerequisites same as in forceps delivery
3. Electronic fetal heart monitoring
Technique
1. Center of cup placed over sagittal suture 3cm in front of 4. Breech presentation
posterior fontanelles
5. Decreased forceps and vacuum deliveries
Subject: Obstetrics 2
Topic: Operative Obstetrics
Page 3 of 4
6. Rise in rates of labor induction ADVANTAGE: cosmetic
7. Obesity DISADVANTAGES:
9. Concern over pelvic floor injury o In repeat surgery, re-entry is more difficult and
time-consuming (more prone to adhesion)
Indications
Repeat Caesarian section – most common 2. Vertical incision
Morbidity ADVANTAGES:
POSTMORTEM CS
Caesarian delivery is performed on a woman who has just died
or is expected to die momentarily.
PERIPARTUM HYSTERECTOMY
Indications:
1. Arrest hemorrhage