Biomass Co-Firing: A Partner in Clean Energy
Biomass Co-Firing: A Partner in Clean Energy
Biomass
Molar ratio
1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 O/C H/C
Biomass has higher H/C & O/C ratio than fossil fuels
Why is it important?
Biomass is a renewable energy No net greenhouse contribution to atmosphere Locally available Less fuel processing energy consumption for absence of mining or extraction
Co-firing concerns
Potential cost of interference with coal plant operation may out weigh additional revenues from co-firing Risks
1. Reduced availability & flexibility 2. Increased O&M of biomass associated equipment
Technical issues
a) fuel preparation & handling b) Combustion related issues c) Ash related issues d) environmental issues
Co-firing options
1. Direct firing - feed biomass in pulverizers2. Indirect firing - Gasify biomass in a CFB gasifier and reburn it in the furnace 3. Parallel firing a) Burn biomass in an external hot gas
generator and feed the gas into the furnace b) Burn biomass in an external boiler and use that steam for heating / generation
It fires the low BTU gas either in the existing boiler or in a special burner May not be acceptable in a gas fired unit Flame stability may be affected
Bio-reburn system
Biomass is gasified in an external gasifier Low BTU gas is burnt in above the burner for reduction in NOx 70% reduction in NOx expected besides CO2 credit (Sutton Station, USA)
Europe
EU countries have a goal of 5-12% power from biomass Near term goal for biomass power generation is through co-firing For example: all available Dutch coal fired plants use about 5% co-firing
CONCLUSION
Co-firing of biomass in existing fossil fuel fired boiler is the fastest and least expensive means for CO2 reduction Externally co-fired CFB boiler gives an attractive practical option for cofiring with minimum impact on existing units
Team proposal Marketing & Financial analysis Sask power SRC USASK
TEAM 50%
NS Power
INDIA WBPDCL