Final Report of FSO
Final Report of FSO
Final Report of FSO
A Minor Project Report Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of
Department of Electrical Engineering Electronics & Communication Engineering Program Institute of Technology, Nirma University Ahmedabad-382481 May 2012
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the Minor Project Report entitled Free Space Optic Link Design submitted by Falak Shah (09bec082) & Kavish Shah (09bec083) as the partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Bachelor of Technology in Electronics & Communication Engineering, Institute of Technology, Nirma University is the record of work carried out by his/her under my supervision and guidance. The work submitted in our opinion has reached a level required for being accepted for the examination.
Date: 20/11/2012
Prof. P.N.Tekvani HOD (Electronics & Communication Engineering) Nirma University, Ahmedabad
Acknowledgement
It gives us great pleasure in expressing thanks and profound gratitude to Prof. Dhaval Shah, Department of Electronics & communication Engineering, Institute of Technology, Nirma University for his valuable guidance and continual encouragement throughout the Minor project. We are heartily thankful to him for continuous suggestion and the clarity of the concepts of the topic that helped us a lot during the project. We are also thankful to Prof. Yogesh Trivedi, Department of Electronics & communication Engineering, Institute of Technology, Nirma University for his kind support in understanding the fundamentals of wireless communication. Lastly, we would like to thank our friends for providing us constant inspiration and support during various aspects of the project.
Abstract
Free Space Optics (FSO) is a communication technology uses that light propagating in free space to transmit data between two points. The technology is useful where the physical connections by the means of fiber optic cables are impractical due to high costs or other considerations. Free-spaceoptical links can be implemented using infrared laser light or LEDs as a source and the receiver with photodiode at the receiver end. This project aims at understanding all that is needed in order to create a transceiver for a FSO link. Beginning with a formal definition and overview of the technology, it goes on to explain the considerations for the transmitter and receiver. Moving ahead, the channel models for optical communications have been explained in the final chapter. The practical design issues for the transmitter as well as receiver have been presented along with the theoretical explanations. Lastly, the circuit designed for function as transceiver and its working is covered.
Beaming light through the air offers the speed of optics without the expense of fiber - IEEE Spectrum August 2001
II
Index
Chapter No. Acknowledgement Abstract Index List of Figures List of Tables Nomenclature 1 Introduction 1.1 Definition 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 2 Factors behind market growth A Case Study Advantages of FSO Limitations of FSO Applications of FSO A typical system model Objectives Of This Project Title Page No. I II III VI VIII VIII 1 1 3 4 5 5 6 6 8 9 9 10 11 11 11 12 12 13 13 16
III
Transmitter for Free Space Optical Communication 2.1 Block diagram and practical circuit layout of FSO transmitter 2.2 Qualities of the optical source 2.2.1 2.2.2 2.2.3 2.3 LED v/s LASER A novel development in light sourcesVCSEL Frequency(wavelength) of operation in Optical Wireless
Modulation Schemes Communications 2.3.1 On-Off Keying 2.3.2 2.3.3 2.3.4 2.3.5 2.3.6 RZ OOK
Manchester Encoded Signal Pulse Position Modulation Comparison of Modulation Schemes Conclusion
2.4
All about LASERs 2.4.1 2.4.2 2.4.3 2.4.4 2.4.5 Unique characteristics Types of LASERs available Working of LASER Diode Classes of LASERs based on eye safety and power Selection of LASER for FSO applications LED Operation and Characteristics Types of LEDs and lifetimes LED Driver LASER Driver Circuit
16 16 16 17 17 17 18 18 19 19 19 21 22 22 24 25 27 28 31 31 31 32 32 33 33 34 35 35 36 36 36 36 37
IV
2.5
2.6
2.7
Practical Design Steps 2.7.1 PC to Transceiver Interface 2.7.2 2.7.3 2.7.4 Using Hyper-terminal to send a file to a remote computer Selection of light source Practical Driver Design models
2.7.5 Power Calculation Receiver for Free Space Optical Communication 3.1 3.2 Block Diagram for Receiver of FSO Photo Detector 3.2.1 3.2.2 3.3 3.3.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.3.4 3.4 3.4.1 3.4.2 3.4.3 3.5 3.5.1 Requirements of photo diode Working principle PIN photo diode Material selection for photo detector Avalanche photo diode (APD) PIN Photo Diode v/s APD Dark current noise Quantum noise Thermal noise Low impedance pre-amplifier
Noise in receiver
Pre-amplifier
37 38 38 38 39 39 40 41 41 43 45 45 47 49 50 50 51 53 53 54
Decision Circuitry Introduction to channel parameters 4.1.1 Atmospheric Turbulence 4.1.2 Scintillation Index Various Channel models 4.2.1 4.2.2 4.2.3 4.2.4 4.2.5 Lognormal channel model with and without perfect CSI Gamma-Gamma Channel model Negative Exponential Model K channel model I-K Channel model
Channel Models
4.2
Comparison of Channel Models Objectives of the Project Design specifications Circuit description Scope Result of the project
Conclusion
References
55
LIST OF FIGURES
Fig. No. 1.1 1.2 1.3 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 Title 10-Gbps FSO link, deployed by MRV Communications' Tele-Scope Last-Mile Connectivity Terabeam Transceiver Block diagram of FSO Transmitter Practical form of transmitter Light power v/s current for LED and LASER Small-signal frequency responses of an LED and an LD with negligible parasitic effects BER performance for OOK (NRZ and RZ), from Eq. (2.38), and L-PPM (L = 2, 4, and 8) Page No. 1 3 6 8 8 9 10 14
Power spectrum of the transmitted signals for OOK (NRZ and RZ), and L-PPM (L 15 = 2, 4, 8) Example of (a) LED drivers, (b) shunt driver Output power v/s current for LASER diode LASER Driver Circuits Ports DB-9 AND MAX232 RS232 to TTL interface HyperTerminal screen variety LEDs available a typical LASER diode 20 21 22 23 24 25 25 26
VI
2.15 2.16 2.17 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 5.1 5.2
Collection of and gates as LASER Driver LASER Driver using op-amp Overall attenuation v/s distance plot for different wavelengths Block diagram of Simple Receiver V-I characteristic of photo diode energy band diagram of PIN photo diode responsivity v/s wavelengths sensitivity v/s Photodiode areas various kinds of Noises Low impedance circuits Trans Impedance circuits Decision Circuitry HVB21 Models Performance of perfect CSI at receiver for log-normal channel model Performance of imperfect CSI at receiver for log-normal channel model Performance of Gamma-Gamma channel model Performance of K channel model Performance of I-K channel model Block Diagram of Transceiver Circuit Photograph of circuit board
27 28 29 31 32 33 34 35 35 37 38 38 40 42 43 45 46 48 51 52
VII
LIST OF TABLES
1.1 2.1 2.2 Comparison of FSO with other technologies in terms of cost Comparison of different baseband intensity modulation techniques. Relationship among Material, System Wavelength, and Band Gap Energy for LED Structures 2.3 5.1 5.2 Power Calculation project design specifications electrical characteristic of BPW-34 30 50 51 2 15 19
NOMENCLATURE
FSO LOS R.I. S.I. CSI BER SNR IM/DD OOK HVB Free Space Optics Line Of Sight Refractive Index Scintillation Index Channel State Information Bit Error Rate Signal to Noise Ratio Intensity Modulation/Direct Detection On Off Keying Hufnagel Valley Boundary model
VIII
Chapter 1
Introduction
1.1 Definition
Free Space Optics, the industry term for Cable-free Optical Communication Systems, is a line-of-sight optical technology in which voice; video and data are sent through the air (free space) on low-power light beams at speeds of megabytes or even gigabytes per second [1]. A free-space optical link consists of 2 optical transceivers accurately aligned to each other with a clear line-of-sight. Typically, the optical transceivers are mounted on building rooftops or behind windows. These transceivers consist of a laser transmitter and a detector to provide full duplex capability. It works over distances of several hundred meters to a few kilometres.
Figure 1.1 10-Gbps FSO link, deployed by MRV Communications' Tele-Scope 10GE. Feb 12, 2010.
the need to turn up services quickly and cost-effectively at a time when capital expenditures are constrained. From a technology standpoint, there are several options to address this "last mile connectivity bottleneck" but most don't make economic sense. Fibre - Optic Cable: Without a doubt, fibre is the most reliable means of providing optical communications. But the digging, delays and associated costs to lay fibre often make it economically prohibitive. Moreover, once fibre is deployed, it becomes a "sunk" cost and cannot be re-deployed if a customer relocates or switches to a competing service provider, making it extremely difficult to recover the investment in a reasonable timeframe. Connecting with fibre can cost US $100 000-$200 000/km in metropolitan areas, with 85 percent of the total figure tied to trenching and installation [2]. Radio frequency (RF) Wireless: RF is a mature technology that offers longer ranges distances than FSO, but RF-based networks require immense capital investments to acquire spectrum license. Yet, RF technologies cannot scale to optical capacities of several gigabits. The current RF bandwidth ceiling is 622 megabits. When compared to FSO, RF does not make economic sense for service providers looking to extend optical networks [3]. Wire & Copper-based technologies: (i.e. cable modem, T1s or DSL): Although copper infrastructure is available almost everywhere and the percentage of buildings connected to copper is much higher than fibre, it is still not a viable alternative for solving the connectivity bottleneck. The biggest hurdle is bandwidth scalability. Copper technologies may ease some short-term pain, but the bandwidth limitations of 2 megabits to 3 megabits make them a marginal solution [3].
Table 1.1 Comparison of FSO with other technologies in terms of cost [5].
2
The need for FSO is accelerated by several factors. First, more and more bandwidth is needed by the end user, which means that more data access must be provided. As a fact, the number of internet users will be increased to approximately 796 million by the end of 2005 [4]. It has been shown that the FSO implementation is not only cheaper compared to the fibre optics, but also compare to other popular technologies like the digital subscriber line (DSL) or cable modem services [5]. Providing last mile connectivity is extremely difficult and expensive. In metropolitan areas, an estimated 95 percent of buildings are within 1.5 km of fibre-optic infrastructure. But at present, they are unable to access it. Street trenching and digging are expensive, cause traffic jams and displace trees.
Figure 1.2 Last-Mile Connectivity Working via a hub building, free-space optics can connect each of the three buildings at the left to a central office of competitive local exchange carrier at 100-Mb/s. This office is a node on a metropolitan-area ring, which is connected to a regional ring by means of conventional fibreoptics equipment [5].
leasing regional dark fibre rings and long-haul capacity from a wholesale fibre provider. It has identified a potential hub, or point-of-presence, less than a kilo-meter from the office park and within sight of one of its central offices. The CLEC currently has no fibre deployed to target customer buildings [see Figure 2]. When fibre was compared with free-space optics, deployment costs for service to the three buildings worked out to $396 500 versus $59 000, respectively. The fibre cost was calculated on a need for 1220 meters: 530 meters of trunk fibre from the CLECs central office to its hub in the office park plus an average of 230 meters of feeder fibre for each of the runs from the hub to a target building, all at $325 per meter. Free space optics is calculated as $18 000 for free-space optics equipment per building and $5000 for installation. Supposing a 15 percent annual revenue increase for future sales and customer acquisition, the internal rate of return for fibre over five years is 22 percent versus 196 percent for free-space optics[2].
The time-consuming and expensive process of getting permits and trenching city roads is completely avoided. Using FSO, a service provider can be generating revenue while a fibrebased competitor is still seeking municipal approval to dig up a street to lay its cable.
6. Very less setup times. 7. Provide an excellent platform for design and testing of more advanced FSO projects and communication protocols. For this, we first describe the components of the transmitter and then receiver, both of which are the elements of the link to be established. We aim at designing the link for testing over small distance under laboratory conditions and hence wont be including any tracking mechanism.
Chapter 2
Source
Modulator
Driver Circuit
Light Sorce
Beam Concentrators
Cooling Mechanism
Figure 2.2 Practical for m of trans mitter The transmitter, which consists of two parts; an interface circuit and a source drive circuit, converts the input signal to an optical signal suitable for transmission. The drive circuit of the transmitter transforms the electrical signal to an optical signal by varying the current flow through the light source. This optical light source can be of two types: (1) a light-emitting diode (LED) or (2) a laser diode (LD). The information signal modulates the field generated by the light source and after passing through optics for concentrating the generated beam moves to the channel. The peltier element acts to cool the laser diode as it is very sensitive to temperature.
8
(ii)
Figure 2.3 Light power v/s current for LED and LASER showing temperature dependency of LASER [6].
(iii)
Speed of operation. Laser diodes are much faster than LEDs due to LED having spontaneous recombination and LASER having simulated emission. Modulation bandwidth up to few MHz for LED as compared up to 10 GHz for LASER.
Figure 2.4 Small-signal frequency responses of an LED and an LD with negligible parasitic effects. (iv) Brightness of LASER as a light source is higher as it combines the properties of an LED and a cavity reflector, producing an external light radiation that is higher in power and has a better focused beam as compared to LED.
10
In the demodulator, the received pulse is integrated over one bit period, then sampled and compared to a threshold to decide a one or zero bit. This is called the maximum likelihood receiver, which minimizes the bit error rate (BER). Another important parameter that needs to be considered in any modulation scheme is the bandwidth requirement. The bandwidth is estimated by the first zeros in the spectral density of the signal. The spectral density is given by the Fourier transform of the autocorrelation function.
2.3.2 RZ OOK
There is a variation of OOK, in which the pulse shape is high for only a fraction of bit duration dTb with 0 < d <1. The benefit obtained from this scheme is a reduction in transmitted power. However, as d decreases, the bandwidth requirement grows faster than the decrease in power requirement. Thus, this type of OOK is inferior to PPM, which offers less bandwidth to achieve a given reduction in power. For d = 0.5, this scheme is commonly called return-to-zero (RZ) OOK. In RZ-OOK, it is intuitive to show that the power requirement is reduced to half of the regular non-return-to-zero (NRZ) OOK discussed earlier, with the expense of doubling the bandwidth.
The demodulator separately integrates the detector output over the two half bit intervals and compares them for bit decoding. The bit is decoded according to which integration produces the higher value, and no threshold need be selected. The system still uses pulse signalling, but
12
the pulse time is one half the bit times, and these results in higher required bandwidths. The BER is now the probability that the bit half interval containing the pulse does not produce the higher value. Since the Manchester signalling is identical to 2-PPM, all the results for PPM can be applied directly in analyzing this scheme.
Since L possible pulse positions code for log2L bits of information, the bit rate is Rb = log2L/T f . The optimum L-PPM receiver consists of a filter bank, each integrating the photocurrent in one pulse interval. The demodulated pulse is taken to originate from the slot in which the most current level was found. If the demodulated pulse position is the correct pulse position, log 2L bits are decoded correctly. Otherwise, we assume that all L -1 wrong position are equally likely to occur. Therefore bit errors usually occur in groups. The BER for Manchester signals for L=2 is identical to the BER of OOK modulation.
13
It is fairly obvious that 8-PPM has the best BER performance, and hence is the most power efficient scheme. To achieve a given BER value, the comparison of power requirement in OOK and L-PPM scheme show that L-PPM requires a factor of ((L /2) log2L)0.5 less power than OOK to obtain a particular BER performance.
Figure 2.5 shows the BER performance of OOK, for both NRZ and RZ, and L-PPM for L = 2, 4, and 8.
Figure 2.5 BER performance for OOK (NRZ and RZ), from Eq. (2.38), and L-PPM (L = 2 , 4, and 8)
14
Another important measure of performance is the bandwidth efficiency. The bandwidth required for modulation can be estimated from the first zero of the transmitted signals power spectrum. Fig.9 illustrates the spectral density envelope (without the Dirac impulses) of the transmitted signals for OOK and L-PPM. Note that only positive frequency is shown and the frequency is normalized to the bit rate Rb.
Figure 2.6 Power spectrum of the transmitted signals for OOK (NRZ and RZ), and L-PPM (L = 2, 4, 8). The bandwidth efficiency is defined as the ratio between bit rate and required bandwidth (in bps/Hz). The required bandwidth is B = Rb for OOK and B =LRb /log2L; for L-PPM. Thus, the bandwidth efficiency of L-PPM can be shown to be at least 1.9 times worse than OOK. To conclude, the comparison results are also summarized as
2.3.6 Conclusion
Signal transmission in optical wireless systems is generally realized using an intensity modulation technique. For FSO systems, although the power efficiency is inferior to PPM, OOK encoding is more commonly used due to its efficient bandwidth usage and robustness to timing errors [11]. Furthermore, the slot timing capability places a lower limit on the slot times that can be used in PPM systems, limiting their advantage over OOK systems. Therefore, in this research work, FSO systems are designed using intensity modulation/direct detection (IM/DD) with an OOK technique.
16
Laser diodes with wavelengths around 635 nanometres are available which is a red beam. Deep Red (670 nm) and beyond, IR (780 nm, 800 nm, 900 nm, 1550 nm, etc.) up to several micrometers are also available. Green and blue laser diodes which have been produced in various research labs, only operated at liquid nitrogen temperatures, had very limi ted life spans (~100 hours or worse), or both. Due to the sensitivity curve of the human eye, a wavelength of 635 nm appears at least 4 times brighter than an equivalent power level at 670 nm. Thus, shorter wavelength laser diodes will be preferred choice.
18
Table 2.2 Relationship among Material, System Wavelength, and Band Gap Energy for LED Structures
because it takes far too long to turn on a diode once it has been completely turned off. The photon intensity from the diode when it is barely conducting must be negligible when designing a product.
b) Circuit Design
The basic construction for any LED driver, in core remains as shown here. The LED are operated with switching on and off of a current in the range of a few tens to a few hundreds mA. This current switching is performed in response to input logic voltage levels at the driving circuit. A common method of performing this current switching operation of the LED is shown in Figure 2.7(a). The common emitter configuration is adapted with a bipolar transistor providing current gain. In this circuit, the output current flowing through the LED is set by the value of R2. However, the switching speed is limited by the diffusion capacitance which means that the bandwidth and current gain have the trade-off relation. To increase the switching speed, low impedance driver (shunt driver) is developed as shown in Figure 2.7(b).
jitter, and decrease the extinction ratio. Maxim designed a high speed LED driver circuit with a data rate of 155 Mbps.
Figure 2.8 Output power v/s current for LASER diode For biasing the laser, a bias control circuit is necessary in designing laser driver circuits. A simple laser driver circuit used to connect the output of a current driver circuit directly to the laser diode is shown in figure 12(a). The threshold current for a laser is provided by Vb ias and modulation current is provided by source resistor, R mod, respectively.
21
This type of single-ended laser driver is typically used with low operating speed due to the unwanted parasitic inductance from the packages bondi ng wires. When this parasitic inductance is combined with the capacitance of the laser driver circuits and lasers, it degrades output of the lasers rise time and causes power supply current ripple. Another example of the laser driver circuit is shown in Figure 12(b) when the driver circuit and the laser are placed in different package. In this topology, a matching circuitry between the driver and the laser is necessitated to overcome the large impedance mismatch. In this circuit, I bias controls the DC threshold current and I mod provides the modulation current for the laser.
22
Working:
Serial RS-232 (V.24) communication works with voltages (between -15V ... -3V are used to transmit a binary '1' and +3V ... +15V to transmit a binary '0') as per the electrical specifications contained in the EIA (Electronics Industry Association) for the RS232C standard. Also, the region between +3 and -3 volts is undefined and open circuit voltage should never exceed 25 volts. On the other hand, classic TTL computer logic operates between 0V ... +5V (roughly 0V ... +0.8V referred to as low for binary '0', +2V ... +5V for high binary '1' ). Modern low-power logic operates in the range of 0V ... +3.3V or even lower. So, the maximum RS-232 signal levels are far too high for today's computer logic electronics. Therefore, to receive serial data from an RS-232 interface the voltage has to be reduced, and the 0 and 1 voltage levels inverted. In the other direction (sending data from some logic over RS-232) the low logic voltage has to be "bumped up", and a negative voltage has to be generated, too. The MAX232 from Maxim just needs one voltage (+5V) and generates the necessary RS-232 voltage levels (approx. -10V and +10V) internally. The MAX232 has a successor, the MAX232A. The ICs are almost identical, however, the MAX232A is much more often used (and easier to get) than the original MAX232, and the MAX232A only needs external capacitors 1/10th the capacity of what the original MAX232 needs. It should be noted that the MAX232 (A) is just a driver/receiver. It does not generate the necessary RS-232 sequence of marks and spaces with the right timing; it does not provide a serial/parallel conversion. All it does is to convert signal voltage levels. 2) RS232 data cable which automatically converts the digital TTL signal to RS232 and back as mobiles need 5V or 3.3V supply can also be used. 3) MAX232N by Texas Instruments. It needs at least 1F capacitors as compared to 0.1 F capacitors in MAX2322A by MAXIM. It is also cheaper in comparison- costs around Rs. 26. 4) Circuit for RS232 to TTL interface level converter can also be used
23
Figure 2.11 RS232 to TTL interface Complete explanation of this http://www.botkin.org/dale/rs232_interface.htm can be viewed at:
24
Setting up HyperTerminal
1) Performing this task does not require you to have administrative credentials. Therefore, as a security best practice, consider performing this task as a user without administrative credentials. 2) To open HyperTerminal, click Start, point to all programs, point to Accessories, point to Communications, and then click HyperTerminal. 3) You must have an active HyperTerminal session connected prior to performing this procedure. Both the sending computer and the receiving computer must be using the same file transfer protocol. 4) If you use the Modem protocol to transfer data, the remote computer will receive the file automatically and will not need to perform a manual receive procedure.
a) LEDs Today, we have available in the market a large variety of LEDs and laser diodes. When looking for LED, we have IR LEDs at our desired range of 850 nm to 880 nm, 1200 to 1300 nm as well as 1550 nm available (although 850 nm and 1550 nm remain the most commonly available and used). They come in a large variety of price ranges from Rs. 5 to as high as Rs. 500 (several manufacturers were contacted and the prices are as quoted by them for bulk purchase of IR LEDs) based on their spectral width, power radiated, half power angle and maximum operating frequency. A few of the IR LED manufacturers are listed below. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) Hamamatsu Dense light Semiconductors PVT. LTD. Cree LED lights Ray science Innovation Ltd. Ad labs Pvt. LTD. New age instruments and materials private Ltd. For our experiment, we use typically, 850 nm LED (cheaper than 1550 nm although having slightly higher atmospheric attenuation index). 1550 nm would be preferred choice in longer distance involving designs. 20-50 nm full width half maximum spectral width 10 mW to 100 mW power are commonly used although up to 350 mW available(as per distance of transmission) 7 deg to 45 deg half power angle (as per cost consideration)
b) LASER Diode
26
A wide variety of LASER sources are available but due to reasons explained in the theory portion, we make use of only LASER diodes. Laser diodes best suited for FSO applications are the above mentioned IR wavelength diodes. LASER diodes are available in IR range (up to 830 nm) but cost as high as Rs. 8000 for LD of power 10 mW and 830 nm. . However a talk with the sales executives of New age instruments and materials PVT. Ltd and other laser diode suppliers and authorised agents for Hamamatsu in India was suggestive that laser diode with 1550 nm remains unavailable. But for our low cost experimental purposes, we can use the cheaply available red lasers of 635 nm range. Here, we look for Power radiated (calculations shown below) Beam spread angle in vertical and parallel directions. Laser diodes are fairly monochromatic so, spectral width is not so much of a concern. Also, at all times in FSO, point lasers and not line lasers should be considered as in line lasers, divergence increases.
Another method of design is to make use of the op-amp The low speed transmitter mainly consists of an op amp, a BJT (Bipolar Junction Transistor) and a LASER. The main idea of the circuit is to function as a constant current source switched on and off by an external pulse generator. When the supply (VCC) is high enough, the current through the laser diode will be dependent on the size of the resistor (REmitter), the voltage applied to the positive port of the op amp and the maximum output swing of the op amp. An example circuit using this has been shown here.
28
2. OPTICAL RECEIVER SYSTEM The receiver system includes the receiver lens, the concentrator, interference filter and the detector. The attenuation of the receiver system RS is given by a sum of looses of its parts. The attenuation of cover window WR, receiver lens RXA, and the attenuation due to the transmission medium to PD coupling PD are given by its practical measurement. The practical measurement at the wavelength = 1550 nm gives us the values: WR = -1 dB, RXA = -0.3 dB and PD = -3 dB. For the wavelength = 1550 nm the value of overall receiver attenuation RS = -4.3 dB and for the 830 nm wavelength the value RS = -6.8 dB. 3. NEP Next, we have noise equivalent power calculations as (example of Type : C30737E-500, Perkin Elmer is considered) . For it, at 1 Mhz [15], NEPDiode = Itot[A] / S [A/W]*(frequency)^0.5 = 1.14 x 10 -12 W/Hz-1/2 B = 1 MHz. This gives NEP=-89.4 dBm. 4. Atmospheric attenuation For the FSO-link the transmission through the atmosphere could be described with attenuation due to the particles influence and propagation attenuation. The propagation attenuation 12 is given by the link distance L12 and the full transmitted angle represented by the back distance L0. The attenuation due to the particles influence part is for the clear atmosphere and the wavelength of 1550 nm given by 1part = 0.48 dB/km [16]. The overall attenuation of the atmosphere is given by a sum
Figure 2.17 Overall attenuation v/s distance plot for different wavelengths
29
5. LINK POWER BUDGET For distance limit calculations it is necessary to calculate the mini mal value of the receiver systems input power PRXA and the output power of the transmitter system PTXA. The minimum power PMIN to guarantee requested bit error rate BER = 10-6 is equal to the photodiodes noise equivalent power NEP increased by the signal to noise ratio SNR = 13.5 dB. The required minimum power at the photodiode PPD is then PMIN increased by the link power margin (20 dB reserve used). The minimal value of the receiver systems input power PRXA is then PMIN increased by the attenuation of the receiver system PRXA. Here for 50 mW system, PTX= 17 dBm is considered and range calculated.
Table 2.3 Power Calculation All units in dBm NEP = -89.4 dBm PMIN= NEP + 13.5 + 20 = -55.9 dBm This means for the above mentioned laser diode of 50 mW power and avalanche photodiode, we get a theoretical maximum range of 10.5 km for 850 nm and 11.5 km for 1550 nm wavelengths used.
30
Chapter 3
Figure 3.2 V-I characteristic of photo diode As shown in V-I characteristic of photo diode, the value of reverse current increases with increase in light intensity. And for particular value of light intensity, current firstly increases and then becomes saturated.
There are 2 types of photo diodes those are mainly used, o PIN photo diode o Avalanche photo diode Avalanche photo diode has its internal gain, while PIN photo diode has not its internal gain, which is well compensated by its larger bandwidth [18].
Figure 3.3 energy band diagram of PIN photo diode The energy band diagram of PIN photo diode is shown here, when photon has energy greater than band-gap energy, it gives energy to electron as shown in the figure.
Where is number of electron-hole pair generated and is the number of incident photons.
Figure 3.4 responsivity v/s wavelengths As shown in the figure, the responsivity is the function of the wavelength and it increases as wavelength increases. But as wavelength increases beyond a limit, then photon energy becomes less than the band-gap energy of the material and responsivity reduces suddenly. Quantum efficiency is independent of wavelength. The best material as photo detector is silicon for wavelengths below 1 m, because in order to produce very large current in photo diode, there must be very large separation between hole and electron, and somehow silicon gives the best separation between hole-electron [21]. So, at wavelengths below 1 m, silicon is used. And at higher wavelengths between 1.1 m and 1.7 m, InGaAs is used, as its responsivity is more at these wavelengths.
34
Figure 3.5 sensitivity v/s Photodiode areas As shown in figure, sensitivity decreases with decrement in photodiode area. And the graph shows the gain of average 10 dB in sensitivity using APD over PIN photo diode.
Figure 3.6 various kinds of Noises As shown in figure, there are mainly three types of the noises. Dark current noise Quantum noise Thermal noise
Dark current noise is present in the receiver as the continuous current flow even when there is no any incident light. Dark current does not depend on the optical signal. Dark current noise is given as, 2 = 2 Where q is charge on electron, B is bandwidth and is dark current. The value of dark current noise is very less in silicon photo diodes.
Where k is Boltzmann constant, R is resistor, B is bandwidth and T is the absolute temperature. As shown in the equation, the light incident on the detector must be reduced for more reduction in induced noise. Very narrow band pass filters are used to select the wavelength of a laser diode and then reduce the ambient light, which is generated by the fluorescent, incandescent lamps and sunlight. So, using this filters noise can be effectively reduced [23].
3.5 Pre-amplifier
The signal is received and converted into photo current by the photo detector, but it suffers from attenuation and its amplitude becomes very low. So, some kind of amplification is required there. Pre-amplifier is of 3 main types, Low-impedance amplifier High- impedance amplifier Trans- impedance amplifier
36
While choosing which amplifier to use, there are mainly 3 parameters to be known are noise, bandwidth and sensitivity. And load resistance plays an important role in setting these 3 parameters [19]. Noise is receiver is inversely proportioned to the load resistance (R L) of the circuit. Thermal noise N,
Bandwidth of the receiver is also inversely proportioned to the load resistance (R L). Bandwidth B,
Sensitivity of the receiver circuit is directly proportioned to the load resistance (R L). Sensitivity S, So, we can say that to keep thermal noise low, we must keep load resistance high. But, with high load, bandwidth decreases. In short, there is trade-off between bandwidth and noise, sensitivity [20].
Figure 3.7 Low impedance circuits As there is low impedance, and bandwidth is inversely proportional to load resistance, we can get higher bandwidth at low impedance. But, this advantage is hindered by the noise and sensitivity of the circuit. Because at low impedance noise is very high and sensitivity is low, which is not tolerable [21]. So, there is trade-off between sensitivity and bandwidth.
Figure 3.8 Trans Impedance circuits Trans-impedance amplifier is mostly used where more bandwidth as well as more sensitivity is required [21].
Figure 3.9 Decision Circuitry In the receiver, after photo diode and pre-amplifier, there is binary decision circuit. This circuit is controlled by mainly a threshold value. This decision circuit compares the sample value with the threshold value, and accordingly, it decides the perfect value, which was transmitted [18]. The comparison is triggered using a clock signal to synchronize. In order to improve the performance of the receiver, some other circuits like, forward error correction, adaptive equalizers are also used. And after signal is detected, further signal processing circuitry is also connected to receiver.
38
Chapter 4
Channel Model
4.1 Introduction to channel parameters 4.1.1 Atmospheric Turbulence
The main purpose In FSO channel model, the most important factor is environment and major impairments due to atmospheric effects. There are many losses like free space loss exponent, clear air absorption, scattering, refraction and reflections considered as atmospheric losses. Now, the refractive index at every different point in environment will vary because of temperature and pressure fluctuation will be different at different points, this will result in atmospheric turbulence. This atmospheric turbulence is responsible for scintillation or signal fading, which is irradiance fluctuation in received signal. The effect of scintillation will degrade the performance of overall established link, which will finally increase bit error rate for same signal to noise ratio over the optical link. In order to understand the overall effect on BER due to atmospheric turbulence, it is important to describe the power spectrum of atmospheric turbulence in its mathematical model. That is derived using Kalmogorov theory as, 1 1 L0 l0 2 Where L0 and l0 are large and small eddy size of 10-100 m and 1 cm, respectively, is the refractive index structure parameter that gives the spatial frequency and it depends upon 2 the geographical location, altitude and time of day. Values of for different turbulence levels like weak turbulence, moderate turbulence and strong turbulence: n =0.033C2 - 3 , n
11
where
2 = 10-17 m-2/3 for weak turbulence = 10-15 m- 2/3 for moderate turbulence = 10-13 m-2/3 for strong turbulence
Refractive index structure parameter is almost constant for horizontal path propagation. But in vertical path propagation, temperature gradient is different at different altitude and thats why refractive index structure parameter varies w ith altitude. Now, when we want to measure Refractive index structure parameter for slant edge, we have to consider vertical propagation and that is why it is very difficult to measure it for slant edge. There are some models like SLC-Day model, clear 1 model, Hufnagel Valley Boundary (HVB) model, PAMELA model, Greenwood model, HV-Night model and Gurvich model, which give refractive index structure parameter for slant edges. But as a special case of ground to satellite communication for uplink the data, there are large variations in the atmospheric conditions. In
39
these conditions, Hufnagel Valley Boundary (HVB) model gives the best performance. So, model should be chosen according to application. The mathematical model of HVB is as shown below,
2 = 1
27
10
exp
2 + 2 exp + 0 exp 1 2 3
Where a1= 5.94 x 10-23, a2= 2.7 x 10-16, s1=1000 m, s2= 1500 m, s3= 100 m and h is altitude (m), V is the root mean square wind speed in m/s which controls high altitude turbulence strength at ground level. The refractive index structure parameter versus the altitude, h has been shown in Fig. 1 for HVB-21 model with V= 21 m/s. For different values 2 2 2 of (0), decreases with increasing height and is nearly independent of (0) when altitude is greater than 1 km.
Here I denote irradiance that is the received intensity of the optical field after passing it through turbulent medium. Now from this value of S, turbulence can be identified as strong or weak. As shown in equation, S is basically ratio of standard deviation to mean of irradiance. Now if S is exactly 1, that means mean is equal to standard deviation, in this case the effect of turbulence is so high, so fluctuations are very frequent such that deviation is equal to the mean value of signal, so in this case there is strong turbulence. On the other hand, if S is less than 0.75, in that case deviation in signal or fluctuations in the signal is less than
40
its average value, so the effect of turbulence is less in this case than before one, so here is weak turbulence.
Where is the quantum efficiency of the photo receiver, e the electron charge, the signal wavelength, Planks constant and c is the speed of light. And definition of I will change according to models.
4.2.1 Lognormal channel model A. With perfect channel state information (CSI) at receiver
As it is mentioned earlier that I depends on channel models, in lognormal channel model, I is = 2 Where, Z is the Gaussian distribution with Mean 0 and variance 2. So, I will follow 2 2 2 log-normal distribution with mean 2 and variance 4 ( 4 1) [25]. Now finding Signal to Noise ratio (SNR) from all above equation, it should be 2*E[I]2/N0, but using somewhat different definition of SNR, we are taking formula as, = 2 E 2 E 2 N0
41
Now calculating error probability for this model using power series approach, Pe,L(g, x)= 2
1 1
Where Pe,L is bit error rate probability which is a function of g (signal to noise ration) and x (fading intensity).SNR can be calculated by
4 2 2 (1+0) 2
.Where, R is responsivity
of receiver, P is transmitted power and 1 and 0 are standard deviation of noise currents for symbols 1 and 0. As the channel coefficients h at different times are independent identical variable, than according to moment-generating function (MFG) the variance of h can be calculated as, =
2 +2 2 4 +4 2
I2 = 2 []2 =
( 4 1)
= 1 1 2 Where, and are mean and standard deviation of random variable x at transmitter and 1 is mean of channel due to scintillation [25]. Now if y = hx+n, and power of x is Es, then signal power = E[hx] 2 = E[h]2*Es , but transmitted power is Es . And channel cant add or abstract power, so transmitted power is equal to received power. So, E[h] 2 is equal to 1. Same will be the case here with channel fading due to scintillation taking as h. So, 1 = 1. = 2 . Finally, I 2=( 4 1). Below is the graph of BER v/s SNR for different value of .
2
Figure 4.2 Performance of perfect CSI at receiver for log-normal channel model
42
Using all above equations [25], we can convert the value of SNR in terms of h, SNR = (1+0) 2
4 2 2 2
Figure 4.3 Performance of imperfect CSI at receiver for log-normal channel model
43
Where Ka(.) is the modified Bessel function of second kind of order a. and are the effective number of small scale and large scale eddies of the scattering environment. Modified Rytov theory defines the optical field as a function of perturbations which are due to large scale and small scale atmospheric effects [24]. Now from this result, we can find the BER performance of scheme as, Pb= Where D() is given by D()=2
+4 4
2 6 () 0 (122 )2
K-(2
Where c1=
(
+1 ) 2
c2=( +
2
1 16
( )2 )
2
In above equation, and are the effective number of small scale and large scale eddies of the scattering environment and can be calculated as [24], 0.49 2 = exp (1 + 0.18 2 + 0.56 12/5 )7/6 0.51 2 (1 + 0.69 12/5 )5/6 = exp (1 + 0.9 2 + 0.62 2 12/5 )5/6
1
1
1
44
1 1 exp ;
> 0
45
1 exp ; ()
> 0
1 , 0
and is a channel
parameter related to effective number of discrete scatters. The unconditional distribution for irradiance is given as,
1 2
+1 +1 2 +1 ( ) 4
Using a simple transformation, the pdf of instantaneous SNR can be given as,
2 4
+1 3 +1 4
= ()
1 2
Where, K() is the modified Bessel function of the second kind of order . is average electrical SNR at the receiver. Which is given by =([])2 0 . As the Bessel function is denoted by K here, this channel model is known as K channel model. The BER v/s SNR plot is given as below,
Figure 4.5 Performance of K channel model The limitation of the K channel model is that it lacks the numerical computation in much closed form, thats why I-K channel model is proposed [29].
46
1 2
1+
1 2 1 + ; < 2 1 +
1+
1 2
1 2
1+
1 2 1 + ; >
Where, () is modified Bessel function of first kind of order , K() is the modified Bessel function of the second kind of order , and are channel parameters related to effective number of discrete scatters and coherence parameters, respectively [27]. Again using a simple transformation, SNR is obtained as, 2 1 + 1 = 2 1 + 1
1+
1 3 2 4 +1 4
2 1 +
1+
1 3 2 4 +1 4
2 1 +
Now from the equation of channel capacity, = log 2 (1 + ), we have pdf of capacity, C as following,
47
2 +1 (2) 1
1 +
1+
1 3 1) 4 2 (2 +1 4
1 2
1+ 2
1 =
2 1 + 1 +
2 1
2 +1 (2) 1
1+
1 3 1) 4 2 (2 +1 4
2 1 +
2 1 0
> 2 (1+ )2
Now, outage probability, r is defined as, = So, pdf of outage can be written as, 2 = 1 2 (1 + ) 2 1 +
1+
1+ 2 (2 1)4 2 1
2 1 +
1 1)4 2 (2
2 1
; > 2 (1+ ) 2
The following shows the result of BER v/s SNR for I-K channel model,
49
Chapter 5
The following table shows the electrical characteristic of BPW-34 Min. Typ. Max. Reverse Breakdown Voltage V(BR) 60 Reverse Dark Current Iro 2 30 Rev. Light Current Ira 75 65 Half Angle Peak Wavelength 900 600-1050 Spectral Bandwidth Rise & Fall Time 100/100 Table 5.2 electrical characteristic of BPW-34 Unit V nA uA deg nm nm uS
Figure 5.1 Block Diagram of Transceiver Circuit Almost all digital devices which we are using today require either TTL or CMOS logic levels. Therefore the first step to connecting a device to the RS-232 port is to transform the RS-232 levels back into 0 and 5 Volts by RS-232 Level Converters. Two common RS-232 Level Converters are the 1488 RS-232 Driver and the 1489 RS232 Receiver and each package contains 4 inverters of the one type, either Drivers or Receivers. The driver requires two supply voltages, +7.5 to +15v and -7.5 to -15v. The transceiver is based on the MAX232A IC for transmitting and receiving RS-232 compatible voltage signals. The MAX232A generates +10V and -10V voltage swings using a dual charge-pump voltage converter from a single +5VDC voltage. This IC includes two receivers and two transmitters in the same package in order to make it full duplex. The
51
MAX232A version requires only 0.1uF capacitors for the charge-pump and inverter, whereas the MAX232 requires 1uF capacitors for the same. So, the advantage of the A version is that it has faster response times, and allows for faster data rates. The laser diode driver consists of a 7405 open-collector hex inverter IC to convert it to 5V DC and all the outputs of the inverters are coupled together to provide enough drive current for the laser diode which draws around 35mA @ 3V. The two 1N4001 diodes, in series with the laser diode, step down the voltage from +5VDC to around 3.6VDC which is close to the nominal voltage for the laser diode to drive it. The receiving sensor is a PIN Infrared photo-diode numbered BPW-34, which has a very wide spectral bandwidth from 600nm to 1050 nm. The signal from the photo-diode is amplified by the Non-inverting OPAMP amplifier 741. The gain of the amplifier is set to 10 by fixing the resistance ratio of 10:1. This amplifier serves 2 purposes: One it acts as a high impedance buffer to the output of the photodiode as this is needed since the photodiode cannot source more than a few microamperes of current and secondly the range of voltage variation between the light and dark condition at the output of the photo-diode was very small and had to be amplified to digital levels. The output of the OPAMP is then buffered via a pair of Schmitt trigger buffers to clean up and square the signal or sharp that signal. The output of the second buffer is then directly converted to a RS-232 standard signal using the MAX232A. The transceiver is designed in such a way that when no signal is present, at that time the laser is on. This helps to see where the laser is pointing during the laser-detector alignment or not. The transceiver is powered by a 9V DC battery and draws 80mA (laser on) and 40mA (laser off).
5.4 Scope
Due to financial constraints we have implemented this technology at an elementary level. Availability of more funds will help us implement the circuit for higher speeds of the order higher Kbps to Mbps and also widen its communication range from meters to kilometers. The system implemented is basically a one to one bi-directional communication system. It can be modified into one to many multichannel system. One of the limitations of the above system is that it is not able to operate with efficiency in presence of fog, heavy rain or snow. This limitation can be overcome by implementing the several techniques mentioned previously for dealing with environmental factors. When line of sight communication is not possible then the system can be implemented by the use of reflection and deviation mirrors.
53
Conclusion
In nearby future, FSO will become important and necessary medium of information exchange due to its advantages over fiber optics communication. Proper low cost design of transmitters is a viable and better option to prevent trenching and sunken cost of fiber optics. For this project in particular, the FSO transceiver was designed using red laser diode and tested for 1 kbps data transfer in laboratory conditions. The range extension can be done by the use of higher power infrared laser diodes. All the theoretical aspects for transmitter, receiver as well as modulation techniques to be used were studied and design issues arising were discussed. The channel models for the free space optic link were studied in detail and imperfect CSI model added. The simulations for all present day models were carried out using Matlab and the results presented. Thus, a low cost prototype for free space optical communication was designed.
54
References
1. Free Space Optics For Laser Communication Through the Air, Dennis Killinger, Optics & Photonics News , October 2002, Optical Society of America 2. Fiber Optics Without Fiber, IEEE Spectrum, August,2001 3. Mobile computing and wireless communications, by Amjad Umar 4. V. Ramasarma, Free Space Optics: A Viable Last-Mile Solution, Bechtel Telecommunications Technical Journal, pp. 22-30, December 2002 5. Free-Space Optics for Fixed Wireless Broadband (thesis) , Pramadityo Tjondronegoro, 10.12.2004 Munich University of Technology 6. Optical Wireless communications, IR for Wireless Connectivity,Roberto Ramirez-Iniguez, Sevia M. Idrus and Ziran Sun 7. D.C. OBrien, G. Faulkner, K. Jim, E. Zyambo, D.J. Edwards, M. Whitehead, P.N.Stavrinou, G. Parry, V.M. Joyner, R.J. Samsudin, D.M. Holburn, and R.J. Mears, High-Speed Integrated Transceivers for Optical Wireless, IEEE Communications Magazine, 41(3), 5862, 2003. 8. J.M. Senior, Optical Fiber Communications: Principles and Practice, 2nd ed. Prentice Hall International, 1992. 9. X. Zhu and J. Kahn, Free-space optical communication through atmospheric turbulence channels [A], IEEE Trans. on Communications, no. 2, pp. 12931300,2003. 10. Sabi S. and Vijayakumar N. Simulation of a Modem using Digital Pulse Interval Modulation for Wireless Optical Links. 10th National Conference on Technological Trends (NCTT09) 6 -7 Nov 2009. 11. M.Ijaz, O. Adebanjo, S. Ansari, Z. Ghassemlooy, S. Rajbhandari, H. Le Minh, A. Gholami and E. Leitgeb. Experimental Investigation of the Performance of OOK-NRZ and RZ Modulation Techniques under Controlled Turbulence Channel in FSO Systems. IEEE Trans. 2010. 12. THESIS, FREE SPACE OPTICS COMMUNICATION FOR MOBILE MILITARY PLATFORMS by Soo Sim Daniel Neo,December 2003. 13. C. Sinah, J. John, Y.N. Singh, and K.K. Tripathi, Design Aspects of High-Performance Indoor Optical Wireless Transceivers, presented at IEEE ICPWC2005, New Delhi, 2005, pp. 1418. 14. High-speed 1.3-m LED transmitter using GaAs driver IC , Suzuki, T. Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd., Shimaya, Konohana-ku, Osaka, Japan Ebata, T. ; Fukuda, K. ; Hirakata, N. ; Yoshida, K. ; Hayashi, S. ; Takada, H. ; Sugawa, T. 55
15. NEP-Menlo-E-SPC-0002 Issue 01 16. ANDREWS, L. C, PHILIPS. R. L., HOPEN, C. Y.: Laser beam scintillation with application, Washington: SPIE PRESS, 2001 17. KIVK, P. and WILFERT, O.: Power equivalent Gaussian beam for terrestrial optical wirele ss link power budget. In Proceedings of the Junior Scientist conference 2006. Vienna: Vienna University of Technology, 2006. 18. Nur Haedzerin Md. Noor, A.W. Naji, Wajdi Al-Khateeb, Theoretical Analysis of Multiple Transmitters/Receivers on the Performance of Free Space Optics (FSO) Link, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Space Science and Communication, 12-13 July 2011, Penang, Malaysia. 19. J. A. R. Pacheco de Carvalhol, H. Veigal, P. A. J. Gomes, Claudia F. F. P. Ribeiro Pacheco, A. D. Reis , Experimental Performance Study of a Very High Speed Free Space Optics Case Study, 2008 IEEE. 20. Jaime A. Anguita, Jaime E. Cisternas, Experimental evaluation of transmitter and receiver diversity in a terrestrial FSO link, IEEE Globecom 201 0 Workshop on Optical Wireless Communications. 21. Nur Haedzerin Md Noor, Wajdi Al-Khateeb, A.W. Naji, Experimental Evaluation of Multiple Link at the University of Beira Interior Campus: a
Transmitters/Receivers on Free Space Optics Link, IEEE Globecom 2010 Workshop on Optical Wireless Communications. 22. Shen Changyu, Feng Huajun, Xu Zhihai, Jin Shangzhongt, High Speed Free Space Optical Communication System for l km communication 23. Frank S. Marzano, Saverio Mori, Fabrizio Frezza, Paolo Nocito, Giorgio M. Tosi Beleffi, Gabriele Incerti, ElioRestuccia, Fernando Consalvi, EuCAP 2011 - Convened Papers. 24. Murat Uysal , Jing (Tiffany) Li, Error Rate Performance of Coded Free-Space Optical Links over Gamma-Gamma Turbulence Channels, Communications, 2004 IEEE International Conference, 20-24 June 2004, 3331 - 3335 Vol.6. 25. Hassan Moradi, Maryam Falahpour, Hazem H. Refai, Peter G. LoPresti, Mohammed Atiquzzaman, BER Analysis of Optical Wireless Signals through Lognormal Fading Channels with Perfect CSI, Telecommunications (ICT), 2010 IEEE 17th International Conference Publications, 493 497. 26. Hector E. NISTAZAKIS, Andreas D. TSIGOPOULOS, Michalis P. HANIAS, Christos. D. PSYCHOGIOS, Dimitris MARINOS, Costas AIDINIS, George S. TOMBRAS, Estimation of Outage Capacity for Free Space Optical Links over I-K and K Turbulent Channels, RADIOENGINEERING, VOL. 20, NO. 2, JUNE 2011. 27. LETZEPIS, N., FABREGAS, A. G. Outage probability of the free space optical channel with doubly stochastic scintillation. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 2009, vol. 57, no. 10. 56
28. ANDREWS, L. C., PHILIPS, R. L. Mathematical genesis of the IK distribution for random optical fields. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 1986, vol. 3, no. 11, p. 1912 - 1919. 29. ANDREWS, L. C., PHILIPS, R. L. I-K distribution as a universal propagation model of laser beams in atmospheric turbulence. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 1985, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 160 163. 30. ANDREWS, L. C., PHILIPS, R. L. Mathematical genesis of the IK distribution for random optical fields. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 1986, vol. 3, no. 11, p. 1912 - 1919.
57