Scribd
Upload
60 views10 pages

Analysis of Pre Test

- The document analyzes pre-test and post-test scores of experimental and control classes with 37 students each. For the pre-test, the average score of the experimental class was 31.75 and the control class was 37.02. - An F-test was conducted and showed equal variances between the classes. A t-test then showed no significant difference in pre-test scores. - For the post-test, the experimental class average increased to 43.78 while the control class increased slightly less to 42.56. Another F-test and t-test showed no significant difference between the classes in post-test scores. - It was concluded that the experimental technique of Cloze Procedure was

Uploaded by

vegaboz
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
60 views10 pages

Analysis of Pre Test

- The document analyzes pre-test and post-test scores of experimental and control classes with 37 students each. For the pre-test, the average score of the experimental class was 31.75 and the control class was 37.02. - An F-test was conducted and showed equal variances between the classes. A t-test then showed no significant difference in pre-test scores. - For the post-test, the experimental class average increased to 43.78 while the control class increased slightly less to 42.56. Another F-test and t-test showed no significant difference between the classes in post-test scores. - It was concluded that the experimental technique of Cloze Procedure was

Uploaded by

vegaboz
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10

ANALYSIS OF PRE TEST

Experiment class

Control class

N1 = 37

N1 = 37

X1 = 1175

X2 = 1370

X12

x22 = 56600

= 54725

(x1)2 = 1386025

(x2)2 = 1876900

1 = 31, 75

2= 37, 02

Before t-test calculation, F test was done:

S2=

S1

S1

S1

S1

S1

S1

S1 =

S1 =

S1 =

S1 = 21, 89

S1 = 12, 77
= 0,05; df numerator = 37 1= 36; F table = 1, 68
=
Compare F count and F table = 0,34 1, 68

ANALYSIS OF POST TEST


Experiment class

Control class

N1 = 37

N1 = 37

X1 = 1620

X2 = 1575

X12

x22 = 75175

= 77400

(x1)2 = 2624400

(x2)2 = 2480625

1 = 43, 78

2= 42, 56

Before t-test calculation, F test was done:

S2=

S1

S1

S1

S1

S1

S1

S1 =

S1 =

S1 =

S1 = 13, 40

S1 = 15, 02
= 0,05; df numerator = 37 1= 36; F table = 1, 68
=
Compare F count and F table = 1,25 1, 68

F count F table. It means that the both samples have equal variance. Thus, the analysis was continued by
using the t-test for equal variance. Therefore we used a formula:

T count =

S diff =

S diff =

S diff =

)
)

S diff =
S diff =

(0, 02)

S diff =
S diff =
S diff = 2, 46

T count =
T count =

= - 2, 14

The t-table (72) was found to be 1.66629 ( = 0.05; df = N1 + N2 2 = 37 +37 2 = 72)


two tailed test.
The t-count was compared to t-table. T count was found to be smaller than t-table. (2.14 1.66)

Conclusion
H0 was accepted and H1 was rejected. In other word, there was no significance
difference in pre test score average between the two samples. It means that the ability of
two samples were equal. Therefore, the experiment could be continued.

F count F table. It means that the both samples have equal variance. Thus, the analysis was continued by
using the t-test for equal variance. Therefore we used a formula:

T count =

S diff =

S diff =

S diff =

S diff =
S diff =

(0, 02)

S diff =
S diff =
S diff = 1, 96

T count =
T count =

= 0,62

The t-table (72) was found to be 1.66629 ( = 0.05; df = N1 + N2 2 = 37 +37 2 = 72)


two tailed test.
The t-count was compared to t-table. T count was found to be smaller than t-table. (0.62
1.66)

Conclusion
H0 was accepted and H1 was rejected. In other word, there was no significance difference
in pre test score average between the two samples. It means that the use of Cloze Procedure
Technique was not effective for improving the second junior high school students in vocabulary
mastering. Therefore, it can be concluded that this experiment was fail.

Pre Test Score Analysis of the Experimental Class and Control Class
NO

Subject

Experimental
x

Class (XAP1)
X

Subject

Control
x

Class (XAP 2)
x

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37

80
80
80
80
65
65
40
40
40
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
30
25
25
20
20
20
20
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
10
10
10

6400
6400
6400
6400
4225
4225
1600
1600
1600
1225
1225
1225
1225
1225
1225
1225
1225
900
625
625
400
400
400
400
225
225
225
225
225
225
225
225
225
100
100
100

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37

80
65
55
55
55
50
50
45
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
35
35
35
35
35
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25

6400
4225
3025
3025
3025
2500
2500
2025
1600
1600
1600
1600
1600
1600
1600
1225
1225
1225
1225
1225
900
900
900
900
900
900
900
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
625

38
39
40

38
39
40
TOTAL
n=37

1175
x1 = 1175
(x1)2 = 1380625
= 31,75

54725
(x1)2=54725

38
39
40
TOTAL
n=37

1370
x2= 1370
(x2)2=1876900
= 37,02

56600
(x2)2= 56600

Post Test Score Analysis of the Experimental Class and Control Class
NO

Subject

Experimental
x

Class (XAP1)
X

Subject

Control
x

Class (XAP 2)
x

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37

80
80
65
65
60
60
55
55
50
50
45
45
45
45
45
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
30
30
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
30
25
25

6400
6400
4225
4225
3600
3600
3025
3025
2500
2500
2025
2025
2025
2025
2025
1600
1600
1600
1600
1600
1600
1600
1600
900
900
1225
1225
1225
1225
1225
1225
1225
1225
1225
900
625
625

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37

80
75
75
65
65
65
60
60
50
45
45
45
40
40
40
40
40
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
30
30
30
30
30
25
25
25

6400
5625
5625
4225
4225
4225
3600
3600
2500
2025
2025
2025
1600
1600
1600
1600
1600
1225
1225
1225
1225
1225
1225
1225
1225
1225
1225
1225
1225
900
900
900
900
900
625
625
625

38
39
40
TOTAL
n=37

1620
x1 = 1620
(x1)2 = 2624400
= 43,78

77400
(x1)2=77400

TOTAL
n=37

1575
x2= 1575
(x2)2=2480625
= 42,56

75175
(x2)2= 75175

You might also like