0% found this document useful (0 votes)
45 views3 pages

SS CLAMPDeschutesEstuarySTF

Download as pdf
Download as pdf
Download as pdf
You are on page 1/ 3

SPECIAL STUDY SESSION

DATE 1/20/09
AGENDA ITEM 1

CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL STUDY SESSION
Olympia, Washington
January 20, 2009

CLAMP/Deschutes River Estuary Alternatives Analysis


__________________________________________________________________
CITY MANAGER’S
RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff to implement the proposed evaluation of Capitol
Lake issues and public involvement approach.

COMMITTEE
RECOMMENDATION: The Committee of Chairs asked staff to return to the City Council with
an initial briefing and a proposed public involvement process.

STAFF CONTACT: Joe Roush, Program and Planning Supervisor, [email protected],


753-8563
Andy Haub, Planning and Engineering Manager,
[email protected], 753-8475

ORIGINATED BY: Public Works Department

PRESENTERS AND
OTHERS NOTIFIED: Nathaniel Jones, Washington State Department of General
Administration

ATTACHMENTS:
1. Capitol Lake Adaptive Management Plan (CLAMP) Overview of Issues
for Olympia
2. Proposed public involvement approach

BUDGET IMPACT/
SOURCE OF FUNDS: None at this time.

PRIOR COUNCIL/
COMMITTEE REVIEW: Council Committee of the Chairs, December 3, 2008

BACKGROUND: The State Department of General Administration (GA) manages Capitol


Lake as part of the Capitol Campus. In 1997, GA formed the Capitol
Lake Adaptive Management Plan – Steering Committee (CLAMP), to help
advise GA on short and long-term management of the lake.

The steering committee consists of four state agencies (General


Administration, Department of Fish and Wildlife, Department of
Natural Resources & Department of Ecology), three local governments
(Olympia, Tumwater, Thurston County), the Port of Olympia and the
Squaxin Island Tribe. Councilmember Hyer represents City Council on
the committee.
In its first years, the committee began to consider options for the long
term management of Capitol Lake. At that time, it was decided to
maintain a freshwater lake during the next 10 years, while studying the
feasibility of other management options.

From 2003 – 2008, the committee conducted a series of scientific


feasibility studies and alternative analyses. The evaluation has focused
on three potential management options: a managed freshwater lake
(similar in traits to the current lake), and two different estuary
options.

The CLAMP committee is in the process of publishing comparative


summaries, three analysis options, as well as initiating a new round of
public involvement. Later this spring, the committee will present a
recommendation to the Director of General Administration, who will in
turn recommend an option to the State Capitol Committee. The State
Legislature will make the final decision regarding the lake’s future.

Olympia is a major stakeholder in the management of Capitol Lake.


CLAMP acknowledges the City’s role and encourages our input.

ANALYSIS AND OPTIONS: The attached briefing paper provides background on the CLAMP
planning process and an initial evaluation of key issues that may affect
Olympia residents (Attachment 1). The paper serves as an introduction
to the issues that Council will evaluate in more detail over the course
of the next few months. Specific issues include:

Sediment management and impacts on Percival Landing,


private marinas and the Port of Olympia
Potential flooding in downtown Olympia
Recreational activities and community events
City streets and utility infrastructure
Fish and wildlife habitat
Water quality
Local economy
Visual appearance
Cultural values

Staff has prepared a proposed public involvement approach for Council


consideration (Attachment 2). The approach includes dissemination of
information using existing tools (media, City webpage) and small
meetings with affected parties. Staff would summarize the input on
the various issues and present the results to Council and the community
at an informal open house later this spring.

Option 1: Direct staff to implement the proposed evaluation of Capitol Lake


issues and proposed public involvement approach.

Page 2 of 3
Implications

1. Dedicate staff time for further analysis of the issues and


implementation of the public process
2. Will likely require additional meetings with Council subcommittees,
as well as an additional Council meeting in April prior to submitting
a formal recommendation to the CLAMP committee.
3. Informal open house requiring City Council attendance in March or
April.

Option 2: Modify the proposed plan to analyze the issues and/or proposed public
involvement process, while still resulting in the City Council making a
timely recommendation to the CLAMP committee.

Implications:

1. Additional or lengthy processes could jeopardize the City’s ability


to meet CLAMP timelines.
2. Financial resources for the work efforts are limited.

Option 3: Discontinue the work effort.

Implications:
1. Ability to shift City resources to higher priority work efforts.
2. Olympia concerns would not be considered by the CLAMP
committee.

Page 3 of 3

You might also like