Oscilloscope Selection Guide
Oscilloscope Selection Guide
Page 1 of 7
Search Site
Home Online Catalog Oscilloscopes Data Acquisition Software Accessories Customer Service
Introduction
For many engineers, choosing a new oscilloscope can be daunting there are hundreds of different models to choose from with widely varying costs and specifications. This article guides you through the maze of considerations and will hopefully help you avoid making what could prove to be an expensive mistake. By Alan Tong, Technical Director, Pico Technology.
Data Loggers
Data Logger Range Temperature Humidity General Purpose High Speed pH Monitoring
Where will you use the scope (on the bench, at a customer's site, under the hood of a car)? How many signals do you need to measure at once? What are the maximum and minimum amplitudes of signals that you need to measure? What is the highest frequency of signal you need to measure? Are your signals repetitive or single shot? Do you need to view signals in the frequency domain (spectrum analysis) as well as the time domain?
Part # Search
z z z
Contact Us Selection Advice Online Forum Technical Tips Technical Support Technical Articles View Account Previous Orders
z z
Although there are still some engineers who love the look-and-feel (let alone the warmth) of analog scopes, they have few, if any, features that cannot be surpassed by a DSO. If you are still tempted by an analog scope you will find your choice limited. Only a few manufacturers still make analog scopes; some of the models still on sale are based on rather old technology and often have very limited performance. Buying a second hand analog scope may initially seem like good economic sense but, before doing so, check for the availability of spares, as high repair costs can make the purchase a false economy. There are other criteria that have added weight to the analogue vs digital debate. DSOs:
z z z z z
are small and portable have the highest bandwidths have single shot ability have color displays provide on-screen measurements
http://www.pc-oscilloscopes.com/oscilloscope_selection_guide.htm
9/27/2012
Page 2 of 7
z z
Modern DSOs, with their PC connectivity, can also be fully integrated into Automatic Test Equipment (ATE) systems. In addition, the DSO is often used as the front-end of a high speed data acquisition system, making the cost per channel much more economically viable.
Bandwidth
The first feature to consider is bandwidth. This can be defined as the maximum frequency of signal that can pass through the front-end amplifiers. It therefore follows that the analogue bandwidth of your scope must be higher than the maximum frequency that you wish to measure (real time). Bandwidth alone is not enough to ensure that a DSO can accurately capture a high frequency signal. The goal of scope manufacturers is to achieve a specific type of frequency response with their designs. This response is known as the Maximally Flat Envelope Delay (MFED). A frequency response of this type delivers excellent pulse fidelity with minimum overshoot, undershoot and ringing. However, since a DSO is composed of amplifiers, attenuators, ADCs, interconnects, and relays, MFED response is a goal that can only be approached, and never met completely. It is worth noting that most scope manufacturers define the bandwidth as the frequency at which a sine wave input signal will be attenuated to 71% of its true amplitude (-3dB point). Or, to put it another way, they allow the displayed trace to be 29% in error of the input before calling it a day. Remember also that, if your input signal is not a pure sine wave, it will contain higher frequency harmonics. For example, a 20MHz pure square wave viewed on a 20MHz bandwidth scope will be displayed as an attenuated and distorted waveform. As a rule of thumb, try to purchase a scope with a bandwidth five times higher than the maximum frequency signal you wish to measure. Unfortunately, high bandwidth scopes are expensive, so you may have to compromise here. On some scopes, the quoted bandwidth is not available on all voltage ranges, so check the data sheet carefully.
Sample Rate
With analog scopes life was simple: you just selected the bandwidth that you required. For digital scopes, sampling rate and memory depth are equally important. For DSO's, the sampling rate is usually specified in mega samples per second (MS/s) or giga samples per second (GS/s). The Nyquist criterion states that the sampling rate must be at least twice the maximum frequency that you want to measure: for a spectrum analyzer this may be true, but for a scope you require at least 5 samples to accurately reconstruct a waveform. Most scopes have two different sampling rates (modes) depending on the signal being measured: real time and equivalent time sampling (ETS) - often called repetitive sampling. However, ETS only works if the signal you are measuring is stable and repetitive, since this mode works by building up the waveform from successive acquisitions.
figure 1a: 20MHZ square wave captured with a sampling rate of 50MS/s.
http://www.pc-oscilloscopes.com/oscilloscope_selection_guide.htm
9/27/2012
Page 3 of 7
For example the Pico Technology 12-bit ADC-212/100 will sample at 100MS/s real-time or, for repetitive waveforms, at 5GS/s. Figure 1a shows a 20MHz square wave captured with a sampling rate of 50MS/s - almost unrecognizable compared to Figure 1b, the same wave captured at 5GS/s. Now, 5GS/s sounds great, but remember that if the signal is a transient or changing (say a video waveform) then ETS will not work and you will have to rely on the real time (single shot) bandwidth, which is typically much lower.
Memory Depth
Memory depth is perhaps the least understood aspect of a DSO which is a shame because it is one of the most important. DSOs store captured samples in a buffer memory, so, for a given sampling rate, the size of the buffer memory determines how long it can capture a signal for before the memory is full. The relationship between sampling rate and memory depth is important; a scope with a high sampling rate but small memory will only be able to use its full sampling rate on the top few time bases. Figure 2a shows 200ms of a video waveform captured using 1K of buffer memory. The 1K buffer memory limits the sampling rate to 5MS/s (1K / 200s) even though the scope is capable of sampling at 100MS/s.
http://www.pc-oscilloscopes.com/oscilloscope_selection_guide.htm
9/27/2012
Page 4 of 7
figure 2b: The limitation of the small buffer memory is revealed when the waveform is expanded to display the color burst signal.
http://www.pc-oscilloscopes.com/oscilloscope_selection_guide.htm
9/27/2012
Page 5 of 7
figure 2c: shows the same waveform, this time using a 128kB buffer memory.
Bandwidth - to measure the 12MHz signal, we need an absolute minimum of 12MHz, however this will give a very distorted signal so a scope with at least 50MHz bandwidth would be sensible. Sampling rate - to reconstruct the 12MHz signal, we need around 5 points per waveform, so a minimum
http://www.pc-oscilloscopes.com/oscilloscope_selection_guide.htm
9/27/2012
Page 6 of 7
Memory depth - to capture data at 60MS/s for 1ms requires a minimum memory depth of 60,000 samples.
Triggering Capabilities
A scope's trigger function synchronizes the horizontal sweep at the correct point of its signal: this is essential for clear signal characterization. Trigger controls allow you to stabilize repetitive waveforms and capture single-shot waveforms. Depending on the type of signals being investigated, it is worth looking at the trigger options offered by a manufacturer. All digital scopes offer the same basic trigger options (source, level, slope, pre/post trigger) but differ in the more advanced trigger functions. Whether or not the more advanced trigger functions will be useful again depends on the signals being measured. Pulse triggers are useful for digital signals, and an automatic save to disk/memory option can be a great help when tracking down intermittent faults. Some application specific triggers (disk drive testing, for example) are often available as cost extras and are installed as a software or firmware upgrade. If you are likely to use one of these 'cost extras', don't be afraid to negotiate with the vendor. It is not unusual for such 'optional extras' to be thrown in free of charge to clinch the deal.
Form Factor
DSOs broadly fall into three categories: traditional bench-top, hand-held, and PC-based. A purpose built bench top digital scope will usually have the highest performance, and that will be reflected in the cost. Features such as FFT spectrum analysis, PC interfaces, disk drives and printers all tend to be expensive optional extras. Hand-held oscilloscopes have obvious advantages for an engineer on the move, but beware of poor displays (difficult to read in sunlight) and short battery life. For a given performance level they also tend to be the most expensive option. PC based oscilloscopes are growing in popularity as they offer a considerable cost saving over their bench top equivalents. The reason for the cost saving is obvious; by using the mass produced PC already sitting on your desk, you end up with a large color display, fast processor, disk drives and keyboard effectively for free. The
http://www.pc-oscilloscopes.com/oscilloscope_selection_guide.htm
9/27/2012
Page 7 of 7
ability to export data to word processors and spreadsheets with a couple of mouse clicks is also a big advantage. PC based scopes come in two varieties: external and internal. Internal PC based scopes usually come in PCI format plug in cards. In theory, these should be the lowest cost option but this does not always prove to be true. The main disadvantage of PC cards is noise - the inside of a PC can be a very noisy electrical environment and some cards do suffer. Another issue is portability; oscilloscopes based on PC cards are tied to being used with one desktop PC. External PC based oscilloscopes take the form of a small box that connects to the PC via either the USB or the parallel port. By keeping all the analog electronics outside the PC, the noise problem is avoided. A second advantage of external PC-based scopes is portability - they can be used with either desktop or laptop PCs;
Summing Up
Like the dinosaur, the analog scope has really had its day. The cost and performance arguments have made sure that the DSO is here to stay. It only remains to decide which type to buy. When choosing between different scopes, check the following:
z
Try before you buy - and do not be afraid to compare different scopes from different manufacturers. If a vendor will not offer a 'your money back if you are not satisfied' guarantee, then you are better off not dealing with them. For higher cost scopes, get demos and make sure the demos are done with the actual signals you want to measure, not just signals that show the scope in a good light. When buying any scope, ask about upgrades and check what is included in the cost. For PC-based scopes make sure the software is included and ask if you will have to pay for software upgrades. For bench top scopes check the cost of cables and software to connect to PCs/Printers - it can add 50% to the total cost. Check the length of warranty. If your unit fails in use, will the vendor lend another whilst it is being repaired? Finally, look on the internet for independent reviews of oscilloscopes. A search for 'oscilloscope review' on google is a good starting point.
In summary, and in order of priority, It is Bandwidth, Sampling rate (Real-time and/or Equivalent time) and then Memory depth. Note: bandwidth and sampling rate are not upgrade options on most DSOs, so once you've paid anything up to $60,000 (70,000) you are stuck with your choice. Pico PC Based Oscilloscope Range> General Purpose and High Speed Oscilloscopes> High Resolution PC Oscilloscopes> Pico Low Cost Oscilloscopes>
Home
Online Store
Oscilloscopes
Automotive
Data Loggers
Software
About Pico
Site Map
Privacy
Support
http://www.pc-oscilloscopes.com/oscilloscope_selection_guide.htm
9/27/2012