Distance Ladder Report
Distance Ladder Report
Distance Ladder Report
Table
of
Contents
ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................................... 1
GALAXIES
IN
THE
UNIVERSE ....................................................................................................... 2
CONSTRUCTING
THE
DISTANCE
LADDER .......................................................................................................2
PROPERTIES
OF
THE
GALAXIES
IN
THE
UNIVERSE .......................................................................................3
Types
of
Galaxies
present .......................................................................................................................... 3
Sizes
of
Galaxies............................................................................................................................................. 4
Mass
to
Light
Ratios .................................................................................................................................... 4
Dark
Matter..................................................................................................................................................... 4
Hertzsprung-Russell
Diagram................................................................................................................. 5
THE
COSMOLOGICAL
PRINCIPLE ............................................................................................... 6
ISOTROPY
AND
HOMOGENEITY ........................................................................................................................6
THE
AGE
OF
OUR
UNIVERSE ........................................................................................................ 6
THE
FUTURE
FOR
OUR
UNIVERSE ............................................................................................. 7
APPENDIX .......................................................................................................................................... 8
Abstract
This
report
will
cover
the
discoveries
made
about
the
galaxy
we
reside
in.
It
will
cover
topics
such
as
constructing
the
distance
ladder,
where
it
is
revealed
that
nearby
galaxies
are
as
close
as
300pc
and
as
far
away
as
2000pc,
whilst
the
fuzzy
objects
are
shown
to
be
104
pc
up
to
6x105
pc.
The
typical
properties
of
the
galaxies
in
our
universe
are
also
discussed,
as
well
as
the
presence
of
dark
matter.
Both
spiral
and
elliptical
galaxies
were
found,
and
the
spiral
galaxies
were
found
to
have
radii
between
30-170pc.
We
also
found
mass
to
light
ratios
of
several
galaxies,
and
all
exceeded
16M/L
(in
solar
units),
implying
the
presence
of
a
significant
amount
of
dark
matter
in
our
universe.
The
cosmological
principle
is
also
covered,
as
well
as
an
estimation
of
the
age
of
our
universe,
and
its
possible
future.
We
found
that
our
universe
indeed
follows
the
cosmological
principle
-
that
the
expansion
is
homogeneous
and
isotropic
and
we
calculated
the
age
of
the
universe
to
be
approximately
280
million
years.
d=
Where d is the distance to the star, and the symbol represents the angular change in the stars position between the two times of measurement. The double prime denotes that the measurements are taken in arcseconds. This simple relation allows us to calculate distances up to ~10 parsecs. At distances greater than this the angular change in the stars position becomes too small to measure accurately. The next step in the construction of the ladder was to identify the Cepheids that were present in the Universe. They were categorized by the length of their pulsation period. (Completed by Matthew Crank) After the identification of these Cepheids, distances could be calculated to these stars via the parallax method, for the Cepheids that had a parallax angle of greater than 0.01 arcseconds (angles for which the error in the measurements was less than 10%). Once the distances to these close Cepheids were known, their luminosity could be calculated from their measured flux and the newly calculated distance to them via the relationship
1 ''
F=
With F as the sum of the measured fluxes, L the luminosity of the star, and R as calculated via the stellar parallax method. Once their luminosities were calculated, we could construct a plot of the period of a Cepheid against the Luminosity of the Cepheid in order to find a relationship between these two properties of the stars. (Completed by Muhamad Norazman Abd Rahman). The results showed that we had two well defined types of Cepheids, those with a pulsation period of roughly 20hrs and those with a pulsation period of ~65 hours. Both types had very well defined luminosities associated with them. There were vastly more Cepheids in the second group (about 4 times as many) so only Cepheids with this period were used as our standard candle. Cepheids 23 with a period of ~65hrs were found to have a total luminosity of 3.8 10 W . Using this fact we could then calibrate the distances to other nearby galaxies by locating 65hr period Cepheids that were present in them, and using the same flux-luminosity relationship in order to find the distances to the Cepheids. The distance to the galaxy could then be approximated as the average distance to the Cepheids in the galaxy.
L 4 R
The next and final rung in the distance ladder was finding a means to measure distances to the fuzzy objects that were present in the cameras. These objects were found to be clusters of galaxies. A method similar to the one used for the Cepheids was used to find the distances to these objects. The calibration made use of the X-ray sources in the universe. First, there were assumptions that were made in order to progress further with the distance ladder. The first assumption was that all of the X-ray sources were of the same intrinsic brightness. This seems like a rather unrealistic assumption initially, but with such a limited number of X-ray sources in the universe it seems reasonable to assume that the sources only form from a very particular process, or set of conditions. Following this train of thought it does not seem unrealistic to think that all of these sources, if they are indeed all the same type of object, will have very similar values of intrinsic brightness. The next assumption that was made was that the number of X-ray photons collected by the camera is proportional to the luminosity of the object. This is a far more logical assumption to make. Finally, to actually start calculating the final rung in the distance ladder, an X-ray source was found in a nearby galaxy (one that we had already calculated the distance to via the Cepheid period-luminosity relationship). After finding the approximate distance to the source, we could then use the ratio of photon counts between this X-ray source and a second source with a smaller count. The theory behind this process is as follows:
N photons F
N1 F1 L1 4 R 2 2
= = N 2 F2 L2 4 R12
2 N1 R2 = 2 N 2 R1
In this set of equations, the assumption of equal luminosities allows the cancellation of the luminosity ratio, L1/L2. So, from the ratio of the photon counts we can calculate the distance to a second X-ray source. Using this method distances all the way out to the furthest fuzzy objects that contained X-ray sources can be found. (Completed by Aqeel Akber and Matthew Crank) Upon completion of the distance ladder we can say that nearby galaxies are up to ~2000pc away, whilst the fuzzy objects range from ~0.05-0.6 Mpc. So we can say the size of the observable universe is approximately 0.6Mpc in radius.
Sizes
of
Galaxies
From
the
distance
ladder,
it
was
simply
a
small
exercise
in
trigonometry
to
calculate
the
absolute
size
of
the
nearby
galaxies
in
our
universe.
There
were
inescapable
uncertainties,
however,
in
these
calculations.
The
method
used
to
find
the
size
of
these
galaxies
involved
measuring
their
angular
size
(which
typically
involved
little
error),
and
then
using
trigonometry
to
calculate
the
linear
size
of
the
galaxy
based
on
the
angle
and
its
distance
from
us.
The
distance
to
a
given
galaxy
was
estimated
by
the
average
distance
to
65hr
period
Cepheids
that
appeared
to
reside
within
the
galaxy.
This
distance
approximation
is
where
the
large
error
creeps
into
the
method,
because
whilst
we
can
accurately
determine
the
distance
to
a
given
Cepheid,
there
is
no
guarantee
that
the
average
distance
to
the
Cepheids
in
a
particular
galaxy
is
a
good
indication
of
the
distance
to
the
galaxy
itself,
especially
when
the
galaxies
are
quite
close
(500-1500pc).
Because
of
the
(relatively)
small
distances
involved,
the
size
of
the
galaxy
is
almost
comparable
to
the
distance
to
the
galaxy.
This
results
in
a
large
uncertainty
in
the
exact
sizes
of
the
galaxies,
but
the
values
presented
are
accurate
enough
to
provide
a
decent
idea
of
the
average
size
of
the
nearby
galaxies.
The
sizes
of
galaxies
in
our
universe
were
quite
small.
Typically
they
had
radii
around
~70pc,
but
some
had
radii
as
low
as
30pc
while
some
were
as
large
as
120pc.
Once the absolute sizes of the galaxies were found, it was relatively easy to create the rotation curves for the spiral galaxies that were close to edge-on from our point of view. Taking the average radial velocity of a given galaxy and subtracting it from the radial velocities of the stars in the galaxy gave the rotational velocity of the stars in the galaxy. This simply has the effect of separating the rotational component of the radial velocity from the component of the radial velocity that arises from any motion the galaxy might have towards or away from us. Once this was calculated, a plot of the rotational velocity against the orbital radii of the stars was constructed. This analysis was completed for every nearby galaxy that was close to being edge-on in our universe. (Completed by Matthew Crank and myself, example plots contained within the appendix) Once these plots were completed, it was possible to calculate the mass to light ratios for the galaxies we had analyzed. Keplers laws state that the orbital speed of an object about a central mass is proportional to the square of the rotational velocity times the orbital radius, i.e.:
m=
( v(R))2 R
G
Using this formula and the aforementioned rotation curve, we could deduce the outermost star in the galaxy and its approximate rotational velocity. From this we could find the mass inside the stars orbit, or, in other words, the mass of the galaxy. Given the mass of a galaxy and its luminosity, we can determine the mass to luminosity ratio, a value that can show interesting aspects of the galaxy. We found mass to light ratios ranging from ~16-120M/L (in solar units). These values are quite large, and as such they imply that there is a very large proportion of matter in the galaxy that is not emitting light of any sort.
Dark
Matter
The
discoveries
in
the
previous
section
naturally
lead
to
the
question
of
whether
or
not
dark
matter
exists
in
our
universe.
The
answer
to
this
question
is
most
likely.
With
such
high
values
of
the
mass
to
luminosity
ratios,
we
can
reasonably
expect
that
the
extra
mass
present
in
the
universe
is
dark
matter.
There
is
simply
too
much
matter
that
can
not be accounted for in terms of star mass, and so we naturally expect there is a relatively large amount of dark matter present in our universe.
Hertzsprung-Russell
Diagram
In
order
to
gain
knowledge
of
the
composition
of
galaxies
in
our
universe,
we
created
Hertzsprung-Russell
diagrams
for
some
sample
galaxies.
They
showed
the
typical
main
sequence
of
stars,
as
well
as
some
white
dwarf
stars,
and
also
many
stars
on
the
instability
strip
of
the
diagram.
An
example
diagram
is
shown
below:
H-R
diagram
0
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
Log(Luminosity)
Log(Blue
Ilux/Total
Ilux)
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-1
-1.2
-1.4
-1.6
The two colours on the plot represent two sets of stars. The first (red) are the stars with a parallax of greater than 0.01, whilst the blue are all the other stars. (Completed by Matthew Crank)
There were three fuzzy objects that were clear outliers, and they were removed from the plot in order to get a better fit for the points that clearly followed a linear trend. As the plot shows, there is an incredibly strong correlation between a fuzzy objects distance from us and its radial velocity away from us. This gives us a Hubble constant of ~3450.9 This is the evidence that visibly shows that our universe is expanding isotropically and homogeneously. This is obvious from the strong linear fit. Since the points were taken from every camera and because of the fit, we can suppose that the expansion is the same in every direction. The plot itself shows that the expansion is constant with distance, and by these two observations we know the expansion will be constant at every point in space.
This small calculation tells us that the age of the universe is approximately 280 million years, which seems quite reasonable given the distance to the farthest fuzzy objects and their current radial velocities. This assumes that the expansion of the universe has remained approximately constant over its whole lifetime, which appears to be a reasonable assumption, however we are unsure as to how valid the assumption is. (Completed by myself)
Appendix
This
table
shows
the
characteristics
that
were
determined
about
the
spiral
galaxies
present
in
our
galaxy.
(The
ones
close
to
edge
on)
Galaxy
Mass
(kg)
Luminosity
~Radius
(pc)
Mass/Luminosity
M/L
(Solar
name
(W)
(kg/W)
units)
BA03
6.4e34
1.1e29
75
1.29e6
116
BE04
6.9e34
1.3e29
60
4.98e5
99
RD05
2.5e34
3.1e29
60
8.10e4
16
RC05
5e34
2.1e29
40
2.33e5
37
RA05
1.0e35
5.2e29
55
1.96e5
31
FC01
5.8e34
2.7e29
110
2.7e5
42
FE03/4
1.4e35
3.7e29
50
3.8e5
59
What
follows
is
an
example
rotation
curve
for
a
particular
galaxy:
50
40
30
20
10