AbelsProof Peter Pesic
AbelsProof Peter Pesic
AbelsProof Peter Pesic
Abel's Proof
Peter Pesic
Pesic, Peter. Abel's proof: an essay on the sources and meaning of mathematical unsolvability / Peter Pesic. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-262-16216-4 (hc : alk. paper) 1. Equations, roots of. 2. Abel, Niels Henrik, 1802-1829. 1. Title. QA212 .P47 2003 512.9'4--dc21
2002031991
Contents
Introduction
5
23
47
73
95 111
131 145
Seeing Symmetries
Vlll
Contents
Appendix A: Abel's 1824 Paper 155 Appendix B: Abel on the General Fonn of an Algebraic Solution 171 Appendix C: Cauchy's Theorem on Permutations 175 Notes 181 Acknowledgments 203 Index 205
The story begins with a secret and a scandal. About 2,500 years ago, in Greece, a philosopher named Pythagoras and his followers adopted the motto "All is number." The Pythagorean brotherhood discovered many important mathematical tr aths and explored the ways they were manifest in the world. Butthey also wrapped themselves in mystery, considering themselves guardians of the secrets of mathematics from the profane world. Because of their secrecy, many details of their work are lost, and even the degree to which they were indebted to prior discoveries made in Mesopotamia and Egypt remains obscure. Those who followed looked back on the Pythagoreans as the source of mathematics. Euclid's masterful compilation, The Elements, written several hundred years later, includes Pythagorean discoveries along with later work, culminating in the construction of the five "Platonic solids," the only solid figures that are regular (having identical equal-sided faces): the tetrahedron, the cube, the octahedron, the dodecahedron, and the icosahedron (figure 1.1). The major contribution of the Pythagoreans, though, was the concept of mathematical proof, the idea that one could construct irrefutable demonstrations of theoretical propositions that would admit of no
In his attempt to survey the irrational magnitudes, Euclid was laying out possible solutions of what we now call the quadratic equation. But that statement distorts his own way of understanding these matters and thus is seriously misleading. The ancient Greek mathematicians did not know the word algebra," or the symbolic system we mean by it, even though many of their propositions can be translated into algebraic language. Euclid kept numbers rigorously separate from lines and magnitudes. He might have been horrified by the way algebra mixes rational and irrational, numbers and roots. So, as we prepare to consider the meaning of equations, we need to pause and assess the significance of the mathematical revolution reflected in the rise of algebra as we know it. The word algebra" is Arabic, not Greek, and refers to the joining together of what is broken. Thus, in Don Quixote, Cervantes calls someone who sets broken bones an algebrista. The original Arabic algebraists created recipes for solving different kinds of problems, usually imTolving whole numbers. They worked by presenting examples with solutions, but without the methodical symbolism we now associate with algebra and without the systematic processes of solution that are equally important. They did recognize the logical
II II
Van Roomen was so impressed by Viete's astonishing feat that he traveled to France expressly to meet him. Here was a man w 0 c aIme to ave oun t e master art t at wou solve any algebraic problem. Was it really possible that Viete had the tools to solve every possible equation, of whatever degree? In the case of van Roomen's equation of the fortyfifth degree, Viete was lucky, for he recognized that particular equation as closely related to formulas he found in trigonometry. Had van Roomen changed a single coefficient, Viete's solution would no longer have been valid. Clearly, van Roomen had not been envisaging the general problem of solving equations of higher degrees but had come upon that specific equation in the course of his trigonometric studies' and was testing to see if others had discovered it also. Thus, the solution of van Roomen's equation did not after all illuminate the general question of whether all equations are solvable in radicals, and indeed Viete's solution involved trigonometry, which (as we shall see) goes beyond radicals. The tenor of Viete's conviction was clearly that all to solve the quadratic, cubic, and quartic equations. Other