Injection Molding Without The Drying
Injection Molding Without The Drying
Injection Molding Without The Drying
004323
Figure 1. Poly(methyl methacrylate) parts molded without drying (a) without gas counter pressure (GCP) and (b) with GCP.
pressure, which needs to be adjusted to a preset value to cope with a change in the unlled cavity volume and melt pressure. Furthermore, a reservoir with sufcient volume is needed. We evaluated the performance of our GCP molding method by checking the visual quality and the mechanical properties of parts molded with poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and polycarbonate (PC). We used an electric injection molding machine (Sumitomo SE50D) to test the proposed system. For all cases, we chose a mold temperature of 60 C and an injection speed of 50mm per second. Tensile test parts made with undried PMMA and no GCP contained a large number of bubbles whereas those made with GCP were free from bubbles (see Figure 1). The GCP has a similar role in suppressing the formation of voids as in previous foam-molding studies.7 We used our GCP system to manufacture a commercial product part made entirely from PC recycled from scraps, which are not dried prior to molding (see Figure 2). The part molded without GCP has a large number of visible splashes on the surface whereas the part molded under the GCP has an unblemished, glossy surface. The part quality would be acceptable for commercial applications. Continued on next page
10.1002/spepro.004323 Page 2/3 Author Information Sang-Won Woo NID Fusion Graduate School Seoul National University of Science and Technology Seoul, South Korea Sang-Won Woo is a graduate student working on injection molding. Yeong-Eun Yoo Nano-Mechanical Systems Research Division Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials Daejeon, South Korea Yeong-Eun Yoo was a senior scientist at LG Chemistry and is currently a principal researcher. His work focuses on roll-to-roll forming and injection molding of nano- and microstructures. Sun Kyoung Kim Seoul National University of Science and Technology Seoul, South Korea Sun Kyoung Kims research focuses on polymer characterization and processing. He is the director of industry-academia collaborations for SPEs Korea Section.
References 1. M. J. Gordon Jr., Total Quality Process Control for Injection Molding, Wiley, New York, 2010. 2. M. F. Lacrampe and J. Pabiot, Defects in surface appearance of injection moulded thermoplastic parts: a review of some problems in surface gloss distribution, J. Inj. Molding Technol. 4, pp. 167176, 2000. 3. A. M. Grillet, A. C. B. Bogaerds, G. W. M. Peters, and F. P. T. Baaijens, Numerical analysis of ow mark surface defects in injection molding ow, J. Rheol. 46, pp. 651 669, 2002. doi:10.1122/1.1459419 4. J. Bozzelli, Injection molding: you must dry hygroscopic resins, Plast. Technol. 57, p. 27, 2011. 5. M. J. Moran and H. N Shapiro, Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics, 6th ed., Wiley, New York, 2008. 6. S. B. Driscoll and W. F. Gacek, Gas counter pressure structural foam molding versus conventional low-pressure SF molding - a comparison of mechanical properties, Plast. Eng. 40, p. 34, 1984. 7. J. S. Wu and M. J. Lee, Studies on gas counter pressure and low pressure structural foam molding, III. Effect of processing conditions on mechanical properties of molded parts, Plast. Rubber Compos. 21, pp. 163171, 1994. 8. S. Djoumaliisky, D. Christova, N. Touleshkov, and E. Nedkov, Morphology and orientation of PP structural foam moldings, J. Macromol. Sci. Part A Pure Appl. Chem. 35 (7), pp. 11471158, 1998. doi:10.1080/10601329808002108 9. S. Djoumaliisky, M. L. Cerrada, T. Dobreva, and P. Zipper, Development of and isotactic polypropylene polymorphs in injection molded structural foams, Chem. Pap. 64 (2), pp. 246254, 2010. doi:10.2478/s11696-009-0107-6
In summary, we developed an injection molding technology that facilitates manufacture of perfect parts without the need for an energy intensive drying process by keeping the pressure above that of saturation to raise the saturation temperature. The GCP system prevents absorbed water from evaporating out of the polymer during molding and can be transferred to commercial processes with ease. We are currently investigating the vaporization mechanism during injection molding. An easier mold modication technique for the GCP is also under development. The Small and Medium Business Administration, Korea, funded the system development. This study has also been conducted through the Development Project of Large Surface Micro-Machining System Technology funded by the Ministry of Knowledge Economy, Korea. The Industry Academic Cooperation Foundation at Seoul National University of Science and Technology has also supported this study. We thank Dr Kun Sup Hyun and Dr Myung Ho Kim for discussions at the SPE Korea meeting. Uni-Solution Plus, Korea, has commercialized our whole system, which is called UNIMAS.
Figure 2. A commercial part made from 100% recycled polycarbonate (a) without GCP and (b) with GCP.
10. A. K. Bledzki, H. Kirschling, G. Steinbichler, and P. Egger, Polycarbonate microfoams with a smooth surface and higher notched impact strength, J. Cell. Plast. 40, pp. 489 496, 2004. doi:10.1177/0021955X04048423 11. G. Menges, W. Michaeli, and P. Mohren, How to Make Injection Molds, 3rd ed., Hanser, New York, 2001. 12. R. B. Johnson and M. Caropreso, Designing for counterpressure foam molding, Polym.-Plast. Technol. Eng. 25, pp. 187207, 1986. doi:10.1080/03602558608070083