SMS Advertising in India
SMS Advertising in India
There are about 60 million television sets in the country and about four million PCs. The reach of newspapers and other magazines is even lower. One medium, which has the highest reach in the country, is the mobile
1|Page
in
Metro/Urban
India.
Indias largest Wireless Service Providers are Bharti Airtel (23.74%), Reliance (17.54%), Vodafone (16.9%) and BSNL (15.62%). However, these Big 4 service providers are to get increasing competition from Tata Teleservices and Idea Cellular. Also further competition will come from new international entrants such as Bahrain's Batelco, Norway's Telenor and Russia's Sistema.
Figure3: Market Share of Wireless Service Providers (As on 31st March 2008). 2|Page
Mobile operators in India along with voice services, provide mobile value added services like SMS, mobile Internet, e-mail services, chatting services, GPRS etc to customers. Based on the need of customers, innovative services like Closed User Group, Video Conferencing etc. are available to mobile customers. However, SMS currently dominates and contributes around 49% to the overall MVAS revenues.
not understood the full potential mobile advertising. They wish to explore what it means to consumer and as consumer is not responding well to SMS advertising, they say The consumer sees mobile as communication device, so its the consumer wholl tell what to do. Therefore, this study with its objective to find out Indian consumers view of dominantly prevailing SMS advertising will give intensive insight to marketers and will give directions towards the future of SMS advertising in India. This will be done by identifying the drivers of consumers attitude towards SMS advertising, if SMS ads generate purchase intentions and if brand advertise through SMS have any effect on purchase intentions. Further, it will be determined if consumers are willing to except Location Based Advertising and if privacy concerns regarding location tracking will be significant for Location Based Advertising.
Further, SMS advertisements are relatively cheap and easy to send compared with other mediums and provides wide reach, short lead times and rapid response. Mobile marketing is one of the few mobile opportunities in which the potential of the opportunity actually exceeds its current hype. A viral effect takes place and is immense if the receiver of SMS advertisement find it appealing and forwards it to their friends, family and so on, who are not the initial target of the campaign. This turns out as a positive word of mouth or can say positive word of text as people believe, trust and respond well to messages from their known. This viral makes it possible to enlarge the reach of the SMS marketing campaign and also increase its effectiveness linked mobile marketing as having "your best salesman in the pocket of your best customer."
4|Page
without soliciting a backlash as seen on phone calls. Its effective for getting the message out to potential customers or retaining existing ones. Some key points of this report are:
1 in 5 urban Indians have used a SMS based VAS service either as a one-off or on subscription basis
SMS is an effective marketing tool, showing conversion rates a lot higher than other conventional mediums i.e. TV/Radio etc. 1 in 3 Urban Indian has acted in some manner over the SMS i.e. forwarding to others or enquiring about it.
SMS, an advertising medium, has an interaction rate of around 5% A quarter of urban Indians have participated in some sort of SMS contest, a valuable tool for getting consumers involved with products/services
6|Page
7|Page
8|Page
The intensity of using SMS for marketing/promotions is quite high with almost 75% receiving a minimum of 4 such SMS.
9|Page
10 | P a g e
11 | P a g e
Haghirian & Madlberger defines mobile advertising as: The usage of interactive wireless media (such as mobile phone) to transmit advertising messages to consumers in form of time and location sensitive, personalized information with the overall goal to promote goods and services.
Where Scharl, Dickinger and Murphy define mobile marketing as: Using a wireless medium to provide consumers with time- and location-sensitive, personalized information that promotes products, services and ideas, thereby benefiting all stakeholders.
Both these definitions highlight that mobile advertising creates opportunity and value for both, the marketer and the consumer. Definitions also bring out the important features of mobile advertising i.e. personalized, time and location sensitive advertising. Amongst these, time- and location is exclusive feature of mobile advertising, which is not present in any other medium. Location-based advertising takes advantage of this feature to send advertisements based on users location.
12 | P a g e
13 | P a g e
2.3.1 SMS
SMS also referred to as text messages or texting is a form of Instant Messaging system that allows users to send alphanumeric messages of up to 160 characters to any GSM (Global System for Mobile communication) phone. SMS was introduced in 1992 and is one of the fastest growing communications technologies in human history. SMS is most widely used mobile phone service after voice and popular among users of all ages for social and business contacts around the world.
Wei, Xiaoming & Pan (2009) refer SMS as the most successful killer mobile service application. According to ABI Research, SMS accounts for 83% of all mobile messaging revenues until 2013, providing global service revenues of $177 billion. According to Telecoms market research (2009), till mid - 2008 worlds population was 6.7 billion, there were 3.5 billion mobile subscribers and there were 2.3 trillion SMS sent. Such a high usage and popularity show that marketers and businesses would not like to miss this tool to send across their message and bring business.
campaigns. They further noted that SMS ads are 50 % more successful at building brand awareness than TV and 130 % more than radio. SMS advertisements and promotions in the U.S. have proven effective with response rates of up to 12%. Six ways of using SMS for advertising, i.e. brand building, special offers, timely media teasers competitions, polls/voting, products, services and information requests. LBA is done by SMS at present and different ways of SMS advertising would translate to LBA when sent based on the location-specific information of a consumer.
Which Wei, Xiaoming & Pan argue is another major difference between SMS/Mobile advertising and traditional forms of advertising. Adding to it, Location Based SMS Advertising is also categorized into push and pull model.
use mobile phone to check for promotions in preferred categories from retailers in an around that area.
16 | P a g e
Permission based approach is the easiest way to tackle the privacy issue and can effectively build trust. After giving permission consumers would not be surprised on receiving the SMS form marketer, as they would know where and why it is coming, and will respond well to it. Therefore, with permission, marketers can precisely target the consumers and send relevant advertisements, thereby increasing the effectiveness of the campaign. Getting permission to send marketing message is a prerequisite of effective mobile advertising. However, showing creativity by using right combination of questions framing and default answers marketers can encourage customers to give permission. Cyber Dialogue in their study found that 69% of US internet users did not knew how they had given consent to be included on email distribution list. This raises the question for permission to be effective. If consumers issues regarding the privacy and security are not considered, the growth of mobile marketing may be jeopardized, similar to what happened with the growth of e-mail marketing.
17 | P a g e
According to Saunders, Lewis & Thornhill (2007) methodology is the theory of how research should be undertaken, including the theoretical and philosophical assumptions upon which research is based and the implications of these for the method or methods adopted.
18 | P a g e
questions. Both inductive and deductive researches are not totally exclusive of each other and include elements of one another.
in data collection. The research uses e-mail questionnaire survey for collecting the primary data to answer all the research questions, which is usually quicker.
20 | P a g e
3.4. Sampling
Sampling is an important part of research activity. A sample is a subset of large population which represents the characteristics of the entire population and helps gathering the important data in less time and economically. The population for this research is basically all mobile users in Urban India.
21 | P a g e
The Theory of Reasoned Action (Ajzen & Fishbein, 1980; Fishbein & Ajzen 1975) proposes that Attitude influences behavior through intention. Intention is defined as the strength of a persons Informativeness, Credibility, Irritation, Attitude, Intention, Gender, Prior Permission, Entertainment, Subjective Norm conscious plan to perform the target behavior. A study of coupon usage shows that attitude and subjective norm will lead to intention to use coupon
22 | P a g e
Informativeness
Entertainment ATTITUDE
INTENTION
Credibility
INTENTIO N
Consumers attitudes towards mobile advertising are positively related to their behavioral intention to receive and read mobile advertisements.
Apart from ones attitude towards an object, another important variable determining intention is subjective norm in the TRA model. Subjective norm refers to an individuals perception of what Important people think he/she should or should not do, and the individuals inclination to comply with their specific desires. One of the assumptions of the TRA model is that human beings are rational. Basic economic theory states that an individual often maximizes his/her utility. Under this circumstance, consumers only accept mobile advertising when they perceive benefit in receiving and reading mobile advertisements. The use-and-gratification approach can explain the utility perception of mobile advertising. This approach implies that people will consciously choose and employ certain media to satisfy specific needs since the mass media have social and psychological functions.
23 | P a g e
The more positive the subjective norm, the higher the behavioral intention to receive and read mobile advertising.
Katz, Hass, & Gurevitech (1973) also suggested other two needs: 1. Needs related to strengthening information, knowledge, and understanding; 2. Needs related to strengthening aesthetic, pleasurable and emotional experience; Informativeness is described as the ability to inform customers of product alternatives for their greatest possible satisfaction. Informativeness can be interpreted as the ability of advertising to deliver information to consumers in order to satisfy their needs. The Optimum Stimulation Level theory states that people aspire to accomplish a certain degree of stimulation and collect information with intrinsic motivation. It has been considered as the main factor in acceptance of advertising. Informative content is also essential for Internet advertising. A research finds that the majority of the respondents regard the Internet as an information source rather than as an entertainment source. Informativeness is positively related to consumers attitude towards mobile advertising.
With Referring to Figure 1, the fourth hypothesis concerns the effect of the entertainment dimension on consumers attitude. Entertainment element in advertising can fulfill consumers needs for aesthetic enjoyment and emotional release. Based on the studies of Bauer and Greyer (1968), Pollay and Mittal (1993) found that hedonic pleasure (perceived entertainment value) had a positive effect on attitudes towards advertising. The perceived entertainment value of mobile advertisements will be one of the important factor affecting consumers attitudes towards advertising.
Entertainment has a positive influence on attitudes towards mobile advertising. The credibility of advertising is defined as consumers perception of the truthfulness and believability of advertising in general... Credibility has been shown to be one of the antecedents affecting attitudes towards advertising.
24 | P a g e
Credibility is positively related to attitudes towards mobile advertising. Zanot (1981) reviewed survey results in 1930s to 1970s and concluded that the publics attitudes towards advertising became unfavorable gradually. One of the important reasons why people criticize advertising is irritation. The theory of psychological reactance suggests that people react adversely when they perceived their freedom of choice is being threatened. When people feel that advertising is annoying or irritating, they will probably express their irritation by developing unfavorable attitudes towards receiving advertising. People would also tend to maximize their benefits or utilities by reducing the cost, i.e. the irritation caused by the advertising.
Other than the belief dimensions, prior permission (opt-in permission) is also an important factor affecting consumers attitude towards advertising. Permission-based marketing means that Consumers permit marketers to educate them concerning its products. One experimental study indicates that prior permission for an email marketing campaign would favor attitudes towards the advertisers and increase consumers purchase intentions. Since the mobile phone is a highly personal communication tool of the user, prior permission is important for mobile advertising. In addition, perceived risk will determine an individuals behavior. The risk associated with mobile marketing is the loss of privacy of mobile phone users. Rather than maximizing benefits, people will try to minimize their risk. Prior permission can minimize users risk by reducing the chance of abusing their personal data.
Prior permission has a positive effect on attitudes towards mobile advertising. Finally, the next construct, gender, will exercise an effect on consumers attitudes. Gender is regarded as a crucial variable in affecting ones cognition and attitude. Since males and females represent different biological and sociological processes, they will have different affects and cognition during their information processes. Previous studies have revealed that the beliefs, attitude and behavior vary according to gender.
25 | P a g e
Gender will have influence on the attitude towards mobile advertising Various studies found that "Perceived Usefulness" is the central driver of the consumers attitude and acceptance of mobile advertising. Perceived usefulness is "the degree to which a person believes that using a particular system would enhance his or her job performance. Researcher determined that utility or usefulness of mobile advertising to consumers is influenced by message characteristics such as entertainment, credibility, informativeness, and irritation and they have used these message related dimensions and various important consumers related factors to determine the attitude of consumer towards SMS advertising.
4.2 Antecedents of Attitude towards SMS Advertising 4.2.1 Message related factors 4.2.1.1. Entertainment:
SMS advertising can also be viewed as fun, interesting and entertaining, as users need mobile phones for aesthetic, pleasurable, and emotional experiences. Feeling of fun and enjoyment associated with advertisements play a great role towards consumers overall attitudes toward the advertisements. Entertaining advertisements have a good chance to attracting consumers. Therefore, it is important that the message is concise and funny, that can immediately captures consumers attention. Entertainment is the major factor that affects the overall attitude in mobile advertising.
4.2.1.2. Informativeness:
As mobile phones are very personal device, the information delivered to customers must be the one which is in his interest and is relevant to him. The advertisement need to show accuracy, timeliness, and usefulness for the consumer. Advertisements tend to be ineffective and irrelevant because they reach consumers when they are not actually shopping. The contextual information
26 | P a g e
(location and time Information) can improve the effect. Information significantly influences the attitude towards SMS advertising.
4.2.1.3. Irritation:
Receiving frequent and high number of messages on mobile phone can cause irritation to customers, especially at inappropriate time, where customer is busy with his work, which can extremely damage brand image. The relevance and entertainment of advertising may decline with the repetition of messages and would lead to boredom. The number of advertising messages received on mobile influences the advertising value and attitude of the consumer. Adding to it, the cause of irritation are unwanted messages (spam) which may lead to a feeling that ads are too intrusive and affects customers privacy. Due to privacy concerns consumers fear registration on SMS-based information services. Privacy, data security and unsuitable content have been viewed as consumer risk, and have been negatively related with positive attitude towards SMS advertising.
4.2.2. Consumer Related Factors: 4.2.2.1 Attitude towards control and permission:
27 | P a g e
Users permission to receive SMS advertising and control over it have been highlighted across many studies. The importance of privacy issues call for prior consent (permission) from consumers. Consumers wish to have to opt in before they receive mobile advertising messages, and have the option to opt out at any stage and control the volume of SMS ads they receive. Permission is considered to be a major factor that may affect attitudes towards SMS advertising. Marketing communications over mobile phone can only be effective if consumers permit the continuous reception of advertising.
4.2.2.2. Incentives
Individuals by nature like receiving some sorts of benefits and incentives. They especially like receiving incentives from direct marketing programs. Incentives for SMS advertising can include free minutes, free texts, free connection time etc, and they have impact on consumers attitude and intentions towards SMS advertising.
4.2.2.3. Age
Generally, young people are heavy users of mobile services. SMS is infused with the fun factor which makes it especially attractive to young consumers. Younger consumers also show a more favorable attitude toward traditional advertising in a number of dimensions and feel more comfortable with ads. The age influences the attitude towards SMS advertising.
In one of the earliest studies done by Rettie & Brum (2001), found that respondents disliked unsolicited SMS advertising and wanted control over them. Negative attitude was determined, but respondents were positive and preferred receiving ads with incentives (like discount phone calls and promotional offers) and preferred receiving messages only after giving permission. Another early research by Barwise & Strong (2002) in U.K found that consumers enthusiastically showed acceptance for permission based adverting and found it a good way to communicate with them, given that incentives are provided, the message is relevant and the volume of messages is not much. Their study was on 16 to 30 year-olds, and evidence suggests that 51 % of respondents were very satisfied and 42 per cent were fairly satisfied by permission based advertising. Some 72 per cent agreed that advertising with permission was relevant to them and 84 per cent were willing to recommend it.
The importance of permission was echoed in the studies by Bamba and Barnes (2007) in U.K and Tsang, Ho & Liang (2004) in Taiwan, where consumers had negative attitude without permission, but positive if permission was obtained. Bamba and Barnes (2007) noted overall negative attitude of consumer, and identified that brand familiarity did not have an impact on consumers. However, Tsang, Ho & Liang (2004) determined that entertainment was the most significant factor affecting respondents attitudes, followed by credibility and irritation. They also found that consumers were positive when offered incentives and it can increase their intention to receive SMS advertisements. Drossos et al (2007) in an experimental study in Greece also found that incentives were important, however, credibility did not affected consumers attitude.
Bauer et al (2005) in their research identified that the higher the perceived utility (information and entertainment) of SMS advertising the more positive consumers are towards SMS advertising, and higher the risk perceived (data security and privacy), the more negative they are. Entertainment and information value were identified as the central acceptance drivers of SMS advertising. Choi, Hwang & McMillan (2008) found that entertainment and credibility were key factors predicting positive attitude among both Koreans and Americans. But in the U.S., where
29 | P a g e
informativeness positively influenced and irritation was negatively related to the attitude, these did not have any significant effects on Korean consumers.
Further, Haghirian & Madlberger (2005) in their study on Austrian mobile users found all the message related factors to influence the attitude towards SMS advertising, where information was identified to be the strongest factor. They found that attitude toward SMS advertising strongly depends on message characteristics and it need to be developed carefully. They also determined that customers attributes like age do not play dominant role in attitude towards SMS advertising. However, Barutcu (2008) in Turkey found that youngsters between 21- 30 years have more positive attitude towards SMS advertisements and found that consumers have positive attitudes towards SMS advertising. Carroll et al (2007) in their study in New Zealand found that permission to send the message, limit to the number of mobile advertising messages they wished to receive, receiving relevant messages and at suitable time were important factors predicting positive attitude and acceptance of SMS advertising. However, the overall attitude and consumer acceptance of SMS advertising messages was much low.
4.3.1. Conclusion:
Overall an extensive literature review of consumers attitude towards SMS advertising and the main drivers behind these has been done. The main drivers highlighted are entertainment, informativeness, irritation, credibility, incentives, age, and permission and control. It has been analyzed that permission for SMS advertising is really important, which has been identified in the very earliest research by Rettie & Brum (2001), and has been seen across all researches, which makes unpermitted SMS advertising a aggregator of negative attitude. However, the attitude of mobile phone users towards SMS ads has been different in different countries e.g. consumers in Turkey have positive attitude, whereas in New Zealand and U.K more towards negative. Also the other important factors influencing the attitude show differences, like credibility is an important factor for consumers in Taiwan, Korea and America, but not in Greece and U.K, and information has positive effect on Americans and Austrians but no effect on Koreans. This entirely seems to be due to the cultural and technological differences. The
past studies have been conducted in various developed countries like U.K, U.S, Australia, New
30 | P a g e
Zealand etc, and a clear lack of such investigation has been noted in developing countries like India, which is culturally and technologically different to an great extent from the countries past researches have been done. Therefore, based on Research Question 1 What are the main drivers influencing Indian consumers attitude towards SMS advertising amongst Entertainment, Informativeness, Irritation, Credibility, Age, Incentives, and Attitude towards control and permission, it will be interesting to see what are the key factors influencing their attitude and how similar or different are they with the attitude researched in developed countries. This will help in understanding Indian consumers better, for planning SMS marketing strategies effectively.
4.4. Previous research on purchase intentions through SMS advertising and role of brand advertise in purchase intentions.
There is very limited research done regarding purchase intentions through SMS advertising. Wei, Xiaoming & Pan (2009) in their study in Singapore found that SMS advertisement creates purchase intentions and can be highly effective in triggering a purchase when consumers respond positively towards SMS advertising. Rettie, Grandcolas & Deakins (2005), in their study in U.K also found that SMS advertising had positive effect on purchase intentions of consumers. The positive effect on purchase was approximately twice that of positive effect on brand attitude. Positive purchase intentions were related to brand image, where 87.7 % of those who felt more positively towards the brand claimed they were more likely to make purchase. Message relevance was also related to purchase intention and intentions were significant in youngsters between 16 24 yrs. Similarly Choi, Hwang & McMillan (2008) in their study found that brand was a key factors contributing to the purchase intention among both Koreans and Americans. However, Drossos et al (2007) in Greece found that incentives influenced purchase intentions but brand advertised in SMS did not impact the intentions of consumers to purchase.
31 | P a g e
4.4.1. Conclusion:
As per the literature review it has been analyzed that SMS ads have a positive effect on purchase intention. Further, it has been noticed that a brand advertised in SMS can influence the purchase intentions, as seen in case of U.K. and U.S. However, these studies have been done in advance countries where culture and consumer behavior or buying behavior is different from India. From the marketers perspective it is crucial to know how far SMS advertising has an impact on purchase intentions of consumers. Therefore, based on Research Question 2 Does SMS advertising have a positive effect on purchase intentions of Indian consumer and Research Question 3 Does brand advertised in SMS has any positive effect on purchase intentions it will interesting to see the effect of SMS ads on generating purchase intentions and how far the brand advertised influences purchase intentions.
negative attitude and intention was privacy concerns with respect to tracking of location information, as consumers fear marketer tracing them and it will be more intrusive and tend to interrupt the consumer. Even the benefits and value of Location Based Advertising such as relevant message with context (time and location) was valued low by the consumers. Similarly, Drossos et al in Greece found that SMS advertising did not led to positive attitude when received closer to the selling point, reflecting their unwillingness to adopt LBA and location privacy concerns.
4.5.1. Conclusion:
It is analyzed that mobile users from different countries have different responses towards Location Based Advertising. For instance, consumers in Singapore and Finland are ready to use highly personalized location and timely services, and on the other hand consumer in Greece and U.S., are unwilling and do not show value to contextual benefits of Location Based Advertising due to the fear that they can be traced and will be in reach of marketers anytime. Looking at the marketing opportunities and benefits provided by Location Based Advertising, it is expected as a next big thing in India. But no research on consumers views about it has been done there. Any technology cannot precede the human factor, and consumers for whom and on whom this tool will we used it is important to know their views and willingness about it. Therefore, based on the Research Question 4 Are Indian consumers willing to accept Location Based advertising and Research Question 5 Will consumers privacy concerns about location tracking be significant for Location Based Advertising, it will be identified if Indian consumers are positive and willing to accept Location Based Advertising, or will they show significant resistance to it due to location tracking privacy concerns. Overall, the five Research Questions once analyzed will give an extensive insight and knowledge to marketers in India and abroad about how Indian consumer value and how effective the at present used push SMS advertisements sent to them are. Further, it will bring out the views of consumers towards LBA. All the Research Questions are steps by step process to analyze the present and determine the future of push SMS advertising in India.
33 | P a g e
The first section of this chapter presents and analyses the results from the consumer survey. Data has been analyzed using the mean values generated by descriptive statistics using Excel 2007 and one sample t-test is conducted on quantitative data to make relevant statistical inferences. Where ever possible a comparison of findings from previous studies has been done. The second section discusses the findings with relevance to research aim and questions, and lists the opportunities and threats for marketers.
The respondents were also well qualified, with majority having Bachelor (44) or Masters Degree (36). Around 30% were students and 23% were professionals at managerial levels, and remaining were at good executive and analyst levels. It shows quite a good balance of males and
34 | P a g e
females which are the major part of mobile phone users in Urban India. Also the respondents were well educated and at good profiles. Being heavy mobile users they form a good target group for SMS advertising and provide varied data as they have different needs so are their perceptions towards SMS advertisements.
Descriptive Statistics
The descriptive statistics computed from the data is presented below. Data with complete percentages is in Appendix D. *S.D = Standard Deviation. Consumers Attitude and Drivers Overall Attitude Entertainment Informativeness Irritation Credibility of Mobile Credibility of Brand Incentives Permission Control Purchase Intentions Brand effect on Purchase Intentions Willingness for LBA Location Tracking Privacy Mean 3.05 3.43 2.70 2.20 3.16 2.35 2.28 1.93 1.74 3.12 2.47 2.43 3.03 S.D 0.98 0.94 0.97 0.92 0.87 0.91 1.01 0.88 0.81 0.73 0.84 0.85 1.11
Descriptive Statistics
In the results, Mean 1 2.70 is positive (except of irritation) Mean - 2.80 3.20 is neutral and Mean 3.20 above is negative, which is also based on the percentage of responses when analysed for particular question.
35 | P a g e
Entertainment Mean S.D Q1. I feel that receiving SMS advertising is enjoyable and 3.43 0.94 entertaining.
According to the mean rating of 3.43 it appears that Indian consumers dont find receiving SMS ads entertaining and enjoyable. 28.7 % disagreed, 14.81% strongly disagreed and 43.52% respondents were neutral for Q1. Conducting a t-test showed that population mean was () 3.57 (Appendix E 2).
36 | P a g e
Question 2
Informativeness Mean S.D Q2. I feel that SMS advertising is a good source for timely 2.70 0.97 information.
Many authors indicated that consumers will only be positive and accept SMS advertising if they perceive benefits in receiving them on their mobile phone (Bauer et al 2005). The mean rating of 2.70 reflects that Indian consumers find SMS advertising a relatively good source for timely and useful information. As push SMS advertising is mostly for boosting sales, it seems that timely promotional offers and sales informations through SMS channel are found useful and liked by consumers in India, which positively influences their attitude. 6.48% strongly agreed, 38.89% agreed to this and 40.74% were neutral. Conducting a t-test it was inferred that population mean is () 2.55 (Appendix E 3).
37 | P a g e
Question 3
Though Indian consumers find SMS advertisements timely and useful, they consider it as a hindrance in their privacy, which is reflected by the mean of 2.20 for Q3. As the ads are sent without consumers permission in India - too much SMS ads, unwanted messages and any time/anywhere i.e. may be consumer is at work or busy elsewhere causes this irritation. 21.30% respondents strongly agreed and 48.15% agreed that SMS advertising are irritating. Conducting a t-test it was inferred that population mean is () 2.10 (Appendix E 4), which indicates that most people agree and find SMS ads irritating.
38 | P a g e
Question 4 and 5
Credibility of Mobile as Advertisement Medium Mean S.D Q4. I trust the SMS advertisements received on my mobile phone 3.16 0.87
Credibility of Brand advertised on Mobile Mean S.D Q5. I only trust SMS advertisements by the brand I am familiar 2.35 0.91 with.
Analyzing the responses of credibility of mobile ads, it was seen that Indian consumers are almost neutral towards believing and trusting the ads received on their mobile phone. In the mean rating of 3.16, 51.89% said that they are neutral and 18.87% agreed for Q4.
However, Indian consumers show much trust in SMS ads received through the brand they are familiar with, which is indicated by the mean of 2.35 for Q 5. 12.15% strongly agreed, 54.21% agreed and 23.36% were neutral for it. Conducting a t-test showed that population mean was () 2.25 for Q5 (Appendix E 5). This shows that brand and companys image plays an important role for Indian consumers to trust the message sent on mobile phone.
39 | P a g e
Question 6
I am willing to receive SMS ads when some incentives are provided, e.g. free calls, free SMS package, discounts etc.
Incentives Mean S.D Q6. I am willing to receive SMS ads when some incentives are 2.28 1.01 provided, e.g. free calls, free SMS package, discounts etc.
Indian consumers show a positive inclination and intention towards SMS advertising when incentives are provided, as indicated by a mean of 2.28 for Q 6, where 19.44% strongly agree and 50.93% agree for it. Conducting a t-test for Q 6 showed that population mean is () 2.15 (Appendix E6). The power of incentives to influence can also be noted that consumers would be ready to trade off their privacy concern when incentives in form of monetary rewards are given to some extent.
40 | P a g e
Question 7 and 8
I am willing to receive SMS advertisements when I have provided my permission (Consent). After giving permission, it is important that I can refuse (opt-out) to receive SMS advertisements anytime I want.
Mean S.D Permission and Control 0.88 Q7. I am willing to receive SMS advertisements when I have 1.93 provided my permission (Consent). 0.81 Q8. After giving permission, it is important that I can refuse (opt- 1.74 out) to receive SMS advertisements anytime I want.
Like consumers in all countries studied in the past, Indian consumers also consider permission very important for receiving SMS ads, which positively influences their attitude, as indicated by the mean of 1.93 for Q 7, where 31.48% respondents strongly agreed and 51.85% agreed for it. Conducting a t-test for Q7 showed that population mean is () 1.80 (Appendix E7). After giving permission, control over it is even more important for Indian consumers, which is indicated by the mean of 1.74 for Q 8, where 42.06% strongly agreed and 47.66% agreed for it. Conducting a t-test for Q8 showed population mean is () 1.62 (Appendix E 8).
41 | P a g e
Question 9
Based on a five-point Likert scale, where 1 is strongly agree and 5 is strongly disagree, average respondents score was 3.05. This implies that consumers in India are neutral towards SMS advertising. In terms of highest percentage, 39.81% respondents were neutral, 27.78% agreed and 20.37% disagreed for Q9. Conducting a t-test it was inferred that population mean () = 3.04 (Appendix E 1).
42 | P a g e
Question 10 and 11
I am likely to purchase if SMS advertisement is from the brand I am familiar with and trust.
Purchase Intentions
Q10. I am likely to purchase the product(s) presented in the SMS 3.12 advertisements. Q11. I am likely to purchase if SMS advertisement is from the 2.47 brand I am familiar with and trust.
0.84
The mean of 3.12 for Q10 shows that SMS advertising has a neutral effect on Indian consumers overall purchase intentions. 61 % respondents were neutral, 14% agreed and 19.44% disagreed for Q 10. However, if the ad is from a well known and familiar brand, it leads to a positive effect on purchase intentions, as indicated by the mean of 2.47 for Q11. 7.41% strongly agreed, 50% agreed and 33 % were neutral for it. Conducting a t-test for Q11 showed that population mean () 2.34 (Appendix E 9).
43 | P a g e
Question 12 and 13
I would like being able to receive location based SMS advertisements. I would like my location to be traced by the mobile service provider and would be comfortable over my location data being shared with the retailers.
Q12. I would like being able to receive location based SMS 2.43 advertisements.
Q13. I would like my location to be traced by the mobile service 3.03 provider and would be comfortable over my location data being shared with the retailers.
1.11
The mean of 2.43 for Q12 represents that Indian consumers are willing to accept LBA. A good amount of 55.56% respondents agreed, 7.41% strongly agreed and 25.93% showed no strong feeling for accepting LBA. Conducting a t-test for Q 12 showed that population mean is () 2.30 (Appendix E 10). However as per the mean of 3.03 for Q 13 it occurs that consumers are neutral towards their location tracking privacy. 4.63% strongly agreed, 31.48% agreed, and 34.26 % showed no strong feeling for Q13.
44 | P a g e
6.1 Findings:
The following can be the finding for the SMS advertising in Urban India:
1. Feeling of fun and enjoyment associated with advertisements play a great role towards consumers overall attitudes toward the advertisements. According to the survey done it was found that Indian consumers didnt find receiving SMS advertising on their mobile phones entertaining and enjoyable. 28.7 % disagreed, 14.81% strongly disagreed and 43.52% respondents were neutral 2. As mobile phones are very personal device, the information delivered to customers must be the one which is in his interest and is relevant to him. Indian consumers find SMS advertising a relatively good source for timely and useful information. 3. Though Indian consumers find SMS advertisements timely and useful, they consider it as a hindrance in their privacy as the ads are sent without consumers permission in India too much SMS ads, unwanted messages and any time/anywhere i.e. may be consumer is at work or busy elsewhere causes this irritation. The relevance and entertainment of advertising may decline with the repetition of messages and would lead to boredom. The number of advertising messages received on mobile influences the advertising value and attitude of the consumer. Adding to it, the cause of irritation are unwanted messages (spam) which may lead to a feeling that ads are too intrusive and affects customers privacy. 4. Indian consumers are almost neutral towards believing and trusting the ads received on their mobile phone. 5. Indian consumers show much trust in SMS ads received through the brand they are familiar with. Trust is crucial and advertisements received from a credible source give the sense of reliability and positive response. Consumers familiarity with the company and its products or brand contributes towards a source of trust. 6. Indian consumers show a positive inclination and intention towards SMS advertising when incentives are provided. Incentives for SMS advertising can include free minutes,
45 | P a g e
free texts, free connection time etc, and they have impact on consumers attitude and intentions towards SMS advertising.
7. Indian consumers also consider permission very important for receiving SMS ads, which positively influences their attitude. Consumers wish to have to opt in before they receive mobile advertising messages, and have the option to opt out at any stage and control the volume of SMS ads they receive. Permission is considered to be a major factor that may affect attitudes towards SMS advertising.
8. After giving permission, control over it is even more important for Indian consumers. 9. SMS advertising has a neutral effect on Indian consumers overall purchase intentions. 61 % respondents were neutral, 14% agreed and 19.44% disagreed 10. Indian consumers are willing to accept LBA. A good amount of 55.56% respondents agreed, 7.41% strongly agreed and 25.93% showed no strong feeling for accepting LBA. However it occurs that consumers are neutral towards their location tracking privacy.
6.2 Recommendations:
While conducting this research we came to know about the likings and disliking about the customers, we also came to know which factors are more demanding to people for making mobile advertising successful. The following can be the recommendations to the companies opting for SMS advertising: 1. Permission based approach is the easiest way to tackle the privacy issue and can effectively build trust. After giving permission consumers would not be surprised on receiving the SMS form marketer, as they would know where and why it is coming, and will respond well to it. Therefore, with permission, marketers can precisely target the consumers and send relevant advertisements, thereby increasing the effectiveness of the campaign. Companies must have control over receiving and stopping mobile advertisements. 2. Due to privacy concerns consumers fear registration on SMS-based information services. Privacy, data security and unsuitable content have been viewed as consumer
46 | P a g e
risk, and have been negatively related with positive attitude towards SMS advertising. Companies must be concerned about customer data, they should protect their privacy.
3.
Entertaining advertisements have a good chance to attracting consumers. Therefore, it is important that the message is concise and funny, that can immediately captures consumers attention. Entertainment is the major factor that affects the overall attitude in mobile advertising.
4. There should be some selectable time for receiving advertisements. 5. There should be some way of getting location based advertising, for those who want it. 6. Mobile Advertising can be applied for couponing, for creating brand awareness, as entertainment provider in location based services, while can also be used for launching new products and also for building customer relationships. 7. Before sending advertisements companies should try confirm whether the advertisements supports customers interests and moreover companies should try to make the SMS advertisements personalized.
47 | P a g e
CHAPTER 7 References
http://www.mgovernment.org/resurces/euromgov2005/PDF/46_R130MD.pdf http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2008_July_24/ai_n27944624/ http://www.bileta.ac.uk/Document%20Library/1/Privacy%20issues%20in%20Mo bile%20Advertising.pdf . . http://is2.lse.ac.uk/asp/aspecis/20050038.pdf http://smib.vuw.ac.nz:8081/WWW/ANZMAC2004/CDsite/papers/James1.PDF http://www.e-lba.com/Milestones/ELBA_Milestone_4.pdf http://smib.vuw.ac.nz:8081/www/anzmac2005/cd-site/pdfs/12-ElectronicMarketing/12-Lai.pdf [Accessed 4/7/2009]. http://herkules.oulu.fi/isbn9789514288159/isbn9789514288159.pdf http://www.mmaglobal.com/studies/groundbreaking-lba-trials-proveeffectiveness-useful-networks http://www.the-cma.org/PublicUploads/224862FutureMobileDec08.pdf http://www.marketingcollege.com/upload/52438%20MobileMktngMaster.pdf http://www.kingston.ac.uk/~ku03468/includes/docs/M%20Commerce%20The%2 0Role%20of%20SMS%20Text%20Messages.pdf [Accessed 14/May/2009]
48 | P a g e
http://www.sph.com.sg/article.display.php?id=399 http://www.strategyanalytics.com/default.aspx?mod=ReportAbstractViewer&a0= 4016 http://www.slideshare.net/rocky.meets/mobile-marketing-using-a-location-basedservice-presentation http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6V1H4W0WJ5V-11&_cdi=5675&_user=7477707&_orig=search&_coverDate=04%2F05%2F2009& _sk=999999999&view=c&wchp=dGLbVlzzSkWz&md5=da1268da5e6c145c8a91663dd7dbaf47&ie=/sdarticle.pdf http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6V1H4F60JX8-31&_cdi=5675&_user=7477707&_orig=search&_coverDate=08%2F01%2F2005& _sk=999779996&view=c&wchp=dGLbVtbzSkzk&md5=c22dbfcc43eaa44330f8bdcfb55669e4&ie=/sdarticle.pdf http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/ViewContentServlet?Filename=Published/ EmeraldFullTextArticle/Articles/2160020205.html http://writing.colostate.edu/guides/research/survey/contrib.cfm http://www.trai.gov.in/WriteReadData/trai/upload/PressReleases/671/pr21apr09no 38.pdf http://www.trai.gov.in/annualreport/TRAIAR2007-08E.pdf http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=1672102731&sid=1&Fmt=3&clientId=1244 9&RQT=309&VName=PQD&cfc=1 Economic Times 2008 http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/msid3625914,flstry-1.cms
49 | P a g e
http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=uAWZUE7EYzwC&pg=PA183&dq=pull+sm s+advertising+example&lr=#v=onepage&q=pull%20sms%20advertising%20exa mple&f=false http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=HDh1bK5uMvUC&pg=PA91&dq=pull+mobi le+advertising#v=onepage&q=pull%20mobile%20advertising&f=false http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0BDW/is_13_42/ai_72631325/ http://www.netcaucus.org/books/privacy2001/pdf/cacmfinaldoc.pdf http://ndncregistry.gov.in/ndncregistry/index.jsp http://www.trai.gov.in/trai/upload/PressReleases/452/pr23apr07no40.pdf http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Opinion/Editorial/Operators_face_Rs_20K_fin e_for_pesky_calls/articleshow/2706517.cms http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Stressful_and_abusive_lives_of_telemark eters/articleshow/3524321.cms
Permission-Based Mobile Advertising [Online] Journal of interactive marketing Bruner & Kumar 2007 Bruner, C. G. and Kumar, A. (2007). Attitude toward Location-Based Advertising.[Online] Journal of Interactive Advertising
International Journal of Advertising E-Business and E-Commerce Management Journal of Interactive Advertising Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising
51 | P a g e
APPENDIX
APPENDIX 1:
T- Test
1. Performing a two tail t-test on Q9 I feel positively about SMS advertising. Null Hypothesis (H0): Population mean () = 3.04 Alternative Hypothesis (H1): = 3.04 Level of significance = 0.05 Sample mean x = 3.05 Sample Standard deviation = 0.98 Sample size n=108
= 0.106 For t0.025, 107 = + and - 1.960 We accept the null hypothesis Hence, for Q 9 the population mean is () = 3.04 2. Performing t-test on Q1. I feel that receiving SMS advertising is enjoyable and entertaining. Null Hypothesis (H0): Population mean () Alternative Hypothesis (H1): < 3.57 Level of significance = 0.05 Sample mean x = 3.43 Sample Standard deviation = 0.94 Sample size n=108
3.57
52 | P a g e
= - 1.55 For t0.05, 107 = - 1.645 Since t > t0.05, 107, we can accept null hypothesis. Hence, for Q 1 the population mean is () = 3.57 3. Performing t-test on Q2. I feel that SMS advertising is a good source for timely information. Null Hypothesis (H0): Population mean () 2.55 Alternative Hypothesis (H1): < 2.55 Level of significance = 0.05 Sample mean x = 2.70 Sample Standard deviation = 0.97 Sample size n=108
= 1.612 For t0.05, 107 = 1.645 Since, t < t0.05, 156, we can accept the null hypothesis H0. Hence, for Q 2 the population mean is () 2.55
4. Performing t-test on Q3 I feel that SMS advertisements are irritating. Null Hypothesis (H0): Population mean () 2.10 Alternative Hypothesis (H1): < 2.10 Level of significance = 0.05 Sample mean x = 2.20 Sample Standard deviation = 0.92
53 | P a g e
= 1.136 For t0.05, 107 = 1.645 Since, t < t0.05, 156, we can accept the null hypothesis H0. Hence, for Q 3 the population mean is () 2.10
5. Performing t-test on Q5 I only trust SMS advertisements by the brand I am familiar with.
Null Hypothesis (H0): Population mean () 2.25 Alternative Hypothesis (H1): < 2.25 Level of significance = 0.05 Sample mean x = 2.35 Sample Standard deviation = 0.91 Sample size n=108
= 1.149 For t0.05, 107 = 1.645 Since, t < t0.05, 156, we can accept the null hypothesis H0. Hence, for Q 5 the population mean is () 2.25 6. Performing t-test on Q6 I am willing to receive SMS ads when some incentives are provided, e.g. free calls, free SMS package, discounts etc. Null Hypothesis (H0): Population mean () 2.15 Alternative Hypothesis (H1): < 2.15 Level of significance = 0.05
54 | P a g e
Sample mean x = 2.28 Sample Standard deviation = 1.01 Sample size n=108
= 1.340 For t0.05, 107 = 1.645 Since, t < t0.05, 156, we can accept the null hypothesis H0. Hence, for Q 6 the population mean is () 2.15
7. Performing t-test on Q7 I am willing to receive SMS advertisements when I have provided my permission (Consent). Null Hypothesis (H0): Population mean () 1.80 Alternative Hypothesis (H1): < 1.80 Level of significance = 0.05 Sample mean x = 1.93 Sample Standard deviation = 0.88 Sample size n=108
= 1.547 For t0.05, 107 = 1.645 Since, t < t0.05, 156, we can accept the null hypothesis H0. Hence, for Q 7 the population mean is () 1.80
8. Performing t-test on Q8 After giving permission, it is important that I can refuse (opt-out) to receive SMS advertisements anytime I want. Null Hypothesis (H0): Population mean () 1.62
55 | P a g e
Alternative Hypothesis (H1): < 1.62 Level of significance = 0.05 Sample mean x = 1.74 Sample Standard deviation = 0.81 Sample size n=108
= 1.558 For t0.05, 107 = 1.645 Since, t < t0.05, 156, we can accept the null hypothesis H0. Hence, for Q 8 the population mean is () 1.62
9. Performing t-test on Q11 I am likely to purchase if SMS advertisement is from the brand I am familiar with and trust. Null Hypothesis (H0): Population mean () 2.34 Alternative Hypothesis (H1): < 2.34 Level of significance = 0.05 Sample mean x = 2.47 Sample Standard deviation = 0.84 Sample size n=108
= 1.625 For t0.05, 107 = 1.645 Since, t < t0.05, 156, we can accept the null hypothesis H0. Hence, for Q 11 the population mean is () 2.34
10. Performing t-test on Q12 I would like being able to receive location based SMS advertisements.
56 | P a g e
Null Hypothesis (H0): Population mean () 2.30 Alternative Hypothesis (H1): < 2.30 Level of significance = 0.05 Sample mean x = 2.43 Sample Standard deviation = 0.85 Sample size n=108
= 1.604 For t0.05, 107 = 1.645 Since, t < t0.05, 156, we can accept the null hypothesis H0. Hence, for Q 12 the population mean is () 2.30
57 | P a g e
APPENDIX 2:
2. I feel that SMS advertising is a good source for timely information Strongly Agree Neutral Agree Strongly disagree Disagree
3. I feel that SMS advertisements are irritating Strongly Agree Neutral Agree Strongly disagree Disagree
Disagree
5. I only trust SMS advertisements by the brand I am familiar with Strongly Agree Neutral Agree Strongly disagree Disagree
6. I am willing to receive SMS ads when some incentives are provided, e.g. free calls, free SMS package, discounts etc. Strongly Agree Neutral Agree Strongly disagree Disagree
7. I am willing to receive SMS advertisements when I have provided my permission (Consent). Strongly Agree Neutral Agree Strongly disagree Disagree
8. After giving permission, it is important that I can refuse (opt-out) to receive SMS advertisements anytime I want Strongly Agree Neutral Agree Strongly disagree Disagree
9. I feel positively about SMS advertising Strongly Agree Neutral Agree Strongly disagree Disagree
10. I am likely to purchase the product(s) presented in the SMS advertisements Strongly Agree Agree Disagree
59 | P a g e
Neutral
Strongly disagree
11. I am likely to purchase if SMS advertisement is from the brand I am familiar with and trust. Strongly Agree Neutral Agree Strongly disagree Disagree
Location Based SMS Advertising is SMS advertisement which you can receive based on your location. Example, when you are near a mall or in the mall, you can receive a SMS from Levis that '50% discount has started right now, come and grab the latest collection'. Another example, a discounted dinner offer when passing by a favorite restaurant in the evening. Location Based Advertising will be permission based, meaning, where you have given your active permission (consent) to receive the SMS from retailers or businesses you want. Please mark the appropriate for the following questions
12. I would like being able to receive location based SMS advertisements Strongly Agree Neutral Agree Strongly disagree Disagree
13. I would like my location to be traced by the mobile service provider and would be comfortable over my location data being shared with the retailers. Strongly Agree Neutral Agree Strongly disagree Disagree
60 | P a g e