Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 230 views

    Savage Vs Taypin

    Uploaded by

    Mezil Sarol Valdez
    The petitioner sought to nullify a search warrant issued in a case involving alleged intellectual property rights violations. The petitioner argued the court lacked jurisdiction and the search warrant application was deficient because it lacked a certification of non-forum shopping. The Supreme Court ruled against the petitioner, finding that all courts have the inherent authority to issue search warrants, and the certification of non-forum shopping is not required for search warrant applications under the Rules of Court.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Savage Vs Taypin

    Uploaded by

    Mezil Sarol Valdez
    230 views1 page
    The petitioner sought to nullify a search warrant issued in a case involving alleged intellectual property rights violations. The petitioner argued the court lacked jurisdiction and the search warrant application was deficient because it lacked a certification of non-forum shopping. The Supreme Court ruled against the petitioner, finding that all courts have the inherent authority to issue search warrants, and the certification of non-forum shopping is not required for search warrant applications under the Rules of Court.

    Original Title

    Savage vs Taypin

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The petitioner sought to nullify a search warrant issued in a case involving alleged intellectual property rights violations. The petitioner argued the court lacked jurisdiction and the search warrant application was deficient because it lacked a certification of non-forum shopping. The Supreme Court ruled against the petitioner, finding that all courts have the inherent authority to issue search warrants, and the certification of non-forum shopping is not required for search warrant applications under the Rules of Court.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    230 views1 page

    Savage Vs Taypin

    Uploaded by

    Mezil Sarol Valdez
    The petitioner sought to nullify a search warrant issued in a case involving alleged intellectual property rights violations. The petitioner argued the court lacked jurisdiction and the search warrant application was deficient because it lacked a certification of non-forum shopping. The Supreme Court ruled against the petitioner, finding that all courts have the inherent authority to issue search warrants, and the certification of non-forum shopping is not required for search warrant applications under the Rules of Court.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    1. KENNETH ROY SAVAGE VS. JUDGE TAYPIN G.R. NO.

    134217 May 11, 2000 Facts: Petitioner sought nullification of a search warrant issued by respondent court on the ground that the respondent court has no jurisdiction over the offense since it was not delegated as a special court for Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and that the application for search warrant should have been dismissed since it was not accompanied by a certification of non-forum shopping. Issue: Whether the search warrant should be nullified on the ground of lack of certification of non-forum shopping. Held: No. The authority to issue search warrants is inherent in all courts. Administrative Order No. 113-95 merely specified which court could try and decide cases involving violations of Intellectual Property Rights. It did not, and could not, vest exclusive jurisdiction with regard to all matters (including the issuance of search warrants and other judicial processes) in any one court. Jurisdiction is conferred upon courts by substantive law; in this case, BP Blg. 129, and not by procedural rule. With respect to the lack of a certification of non-forum shopping, the Rules of Court as amended requires such certification only from initiatory pleadings, omitting any mention of applications

    You might also like