CSI Sap2000 Bridge Examples
CSI Sap2000 Bridge Examples
CSI Sap2000 Bridge Examples
SAP2000 Bridge Examples Copyright by Computers and Structures, Inc, 2006 All rights reserved.
The computer program SAP2000 and all associated documentation are proprietary and copyrighted products. Worldwide rights of ownership rest with Computers and Structures, Inc. Unlicensed use of the program or reproduction of the documentation in any form, without prior written authorization from Computers and Structures, Inc., is explicitly prohibited. Further information and copies of this documentation may be obtained from: CSI Educational Services Computers and Structures, Inc. 1995 University Avenue Berkeley, California 94704 USA Phone: (510) 845-2177 Fax: (510) 845-4096 Email: [email protected] (for general questions) Email: [email protected] (for technical support questions) Web: www.csiedu.com
The CSI Logo, ETABS , SAP2000 and SAP90 are registered trademarks of Computers and Structures, Inc.; SAFE is a trademark of Computers and Structures, Inc.
PREFACE
This lecture is generally geared towards the intermediate user level of SAP2000. However, if you have never used SAP2000 or SAP2000 Bridge Modeler before, the level of information provided is intended to give the user sufcient information to reproduce all of the bridge examples contained in this booklet. We have designed this course such that the inexperienced SAP2000 user will have no problem following along. The end-to-end examples that are presented will exhibit the most general and common modeling techniques. It is strongly recommended that the SAP2000 user read Chapter XXVI, Bridge Analysis, of the Analysis Reference Manual. The SAP2000 user can use the Help / Documantation / Manuals command to nd this document.
iii
SEMINAR TOPICS
Preface .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
iii v 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 5 7 7 8 9 12 13 14 15 16 21 21 22 24 24 25 28 29 30 30 31 33 34
Seminar Topics Part I I.1 I.2 I.3 I.4 I.5 I.6 I.7 I.8 I.9 I.10 I.11 I.12 I.13 I.14 I.15 I.16 I.17 Part II II.1 II.2 II.3 II.4 II.5 II.6 II.7 II.8 II.9 II.10 II.11 II.12
Concrete Box Girder Bridge Concrete Box Girder Bridge Example Description . . . . . . . . . Model Parameters . . . . . . . Modeling Steps . . . . . . . . Step 1: Layout Lines . . . . . . Step 2: Deck Section Denition . . Step 3: Abutment Denition . . . Step 4: Bent Denition . . . . . Step 5: Diaphragm Denition . . . Step 6: Hinge Denition . . . . . Step 7: Parametric Variation Denition Step 8: Bridge Object Denition . . Step 9: Update Linked Model . . . Step 10: Lane Denition . . . . . Step 11: Vehicle Denition . . . . Step 12: Analysis Cases . . . . . Results . . . . . . . . . . Steel Bridge Steel Bridge Example 1.0 . . . . Layout Line Denition . . . . . Deck Section Denition . . . . . Bridge Object 1 Denition . . . . Create Linked Model . . . . . . Modify Abutment Properties . . . Modify Bent Properties . . . . . Modify Vertical Diaphragm Properties Further Modify Bridge Object 1 . . Update Linked Bridge Model . . . Analyze BOBJ1 . . . . . . . Live Loads . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
vi
Add Vehicles . . . . . . . . Add Analysis Case . . . . . . Add Trucks with Speed and Direction Add Bridge Extensions . . . . . Completed Model . . . . . . . Final Analysis . . . . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . .
36 37 40 47 50 52 53 53 54 54 55 57 57 58 60 63 65 67 69 69 70 71 71 71 75 77
Part III Cablestayed Bridge III.1 Cable stayed Bridge Example . . . III.2 Description of Cable stayed Bridge . III.3 Description of Model . . . . . III.4 Nonlinear Material Property Denition III.5 Cable Property Denition . . . . III.6 Deck Section Denition . . . . . III.7 Pylon Section Denition . . . . . III.8 Model Creation . . . . . . . . III.9 Group Assignments . . . . . . III.10 Staged Construction Analysis Case . APPENDIX
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
Part A Mesh Transitioning, Compatibility, and Line Constraint A.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A.2 Example 1: Simply Supported Plate (Mismatched Meshing) A.3 Example 2: Curved Ramp Supported by Curved Wall . . A.4 Example 3: Floor Slab Shear Wall Compatibility . . . A.5 Example 4: Shear Wall Spandrel Transition . . . . . Bibliography .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . .
. .
. . . . .
. .
. . . . .
. .
PART I
Concrete Box Girder Bridge
I.2 Description
This example demonstrates the powerful bridge module in SAP2000. The model is a concrete box girder bridge with a 200 ft span and is loaded with 2 trafc lanes. The bridge has 3 columns with different heights supporting the deck at midspan. There are parametric variations along the length of the bridge as well as prestressed tendons assigned to the deck. The bridge abutments are skewed 15 degrees at the 2 ends of the bridge deck.
The user can quickly dene a basic model that applies program defaults using the following abbreviated approach:
PART I.
a. Dene a layout line using Step 1. b. Dene a deck section using Step 2. c. Skip to Step 8 to create a bridge object. d. Create a linked model using Step 9.
For the abbreviated approach, SAP2000 will apply default abutment, bent, hinge, and diaphragm properties. If necessary, Steps 3, 4, 5 and 6 of this Wizard can be used to change those default denitions. In addition, prestressed tendons can be added as part of the bridge object denition (see Step 8). Each one of the 12-steps is described in detail.
PART I.
dened column support. A user dened column support can be a specied Link/Support property or it can be a user dened support condition. The user support condition allows each of the six degrees of freedom at the column base to be specied as xed, free or partially restrained with a specied spring constant. The user dened column support is dened separately from the bent. It is also possible to specify that a vertical diaphragm is to be provided at the bent location. The diaphragm is only applicable to area object and solid object models. It does not apply to spine models. After a bent is dened it can be assigned to the bridge as part of the bridge object denition (see Step 8). In this example, click on the Bride menu Bents and select the Add New Bridge Bent option. In the Bent Data box, type in the number of columns: 3. Next, click on the Modify/Show Column Data box in the lower left hand corner. Fill out the form as shown in Figure I.4below and click OK. Make sure you are in Kip-ft units.
PART I.
PART I.
Next, in the same manner as described in the steps above, create a 2nd variation. Only, this time the variation shall be dened with the Linear Parabolic quick start option. The new PARV2 variation should be the exact mirror of the PARV1 variation. Next the user needs to apply these variations to the bridge object. This can be accomplished by rst using the Bridge/Bridge Objectscommand, then opening the Bridge Objects dialog box and selecting the modify/show spans command. The user should apply the PARV1 and PARV2 variations to the Span1 and SpanToEnd as shown in Figure I.6 below. See also, the steps outlined in Step 8 below.
10
The prestress tendon quick start options allow quick and easy layout of prestressed tendons. The prestress tendon parabolic calculator makes quick work of the layout of parabolic prestress tendons. To work within the Bridge Object menu, click on the modify/show bridge object using Dene/Bridge Object command. The Bridge Object menu should appear as shown in Figure I.7.
Next, click the on Modify/Show spans button. In this dialogue box, for Span 1, double click on the span varies box. A Bridge section variation box will open. Double-click on the variation for Total Depth box and select PVAR1 and click OK. Do the same for the next span except select PVAR2 for the variation. See Figure I.6. To apply a skew to the ends of the bridge, click on the Modify/Show Spans and simply type in the bearing angle as shown in the dialog box in Figure I.10
PART I.
11
Bridge Prestress button and select Add new Tendon. Fill in a tendon area of 10 in2 and load force of 1500 kips. Select a Prestress load case. (To create a Prestress load case, go to Dene/Static Load Cases dialogue box.) Click on the Quick Start button for vertical layout and select parabolic tendon 1 and click Ok twice. The tendon loss parameters should also be dened.
12
Once a single tendon has been dened, it can be copied to each of the concrete girder locations by simply clicking on the Copy To All Girders command.
The user can verify the location of the tendon graphically by selecting the the Show All Tendons command and viewing the tendon proles and locations.
PART I.
13
In Figure I.12, you can see the parametric variation along the length of the deck. You can also view the tendons located inside the bridge deck by turning off the area object ll if desired.
14
PART I.
15
16
I.17 Results
I.17.1 Inuence Surfaces
The inuence lines can be displayed for the various displacements, reactions, forces, moments, shears, torsion or axial loads on joints, frames, shells, planes, solids, solids, and links resulting from a unit load on a dened bridge lane in the structure. As an example, after lanes have been dened and a moving analysis case has been dened and run, select a column and use the Display/Show Inuence Lines/Surfaces command to display the Show Inuence Lines/Surfaces form. See Figure I.16
PART I.
17
Figure I.17: Inuence Surface Plot for Axial Force of Bent Columns
18
PART I.
19
To obtain shell forces on the bridge deck, go to Draw/Section Cut. Draw a line through any portion of the structure that you would like to sum forces about. The ashing line represents the section cut. Section Cut forces will then be visible on the screen.
PART II
Steel Bridge
This Example is intended to help the new SAP2000 Bridge User navigate through the program and is intended to get the new SAP2000 user familiar with the Bridge Module. This example provides a step-by-step tutorial for the bridge model shown below. The bridge model is broken down into ve distinct steps using the le names Steel Bridge 1 through Steel Bridge 5. A copy of these input les can be obtained from Computer and
21
22
Structures, Inc. To begin the Example 1 steel bridge model we will initiate the SAP2000 program and select a blank screen using Kip-Ft units and a single window. Then using the Bridge pull down menu we will begin to dene the rst of three bridge objects that will be used to complete this bridge example. Each of the bridge objects are shown below.
Sta tion
Sta
tion
g Brid
t1 jec Ob e
11 00 F
g Brid
T
b eO
t2 jec
12
00
FT
Brid
bje eO
ct
n tio Sta 00 10 FT
PART II.
STEEL B RIDGE
23
From the layout line menu the Quick Start menus can be used to dene various curved, straight or combined curved-straight shapes. For this example the bridge layout line 1(BLL1) will have a straight shape.
Using the layout line dialog box shown in Figure 1.3 the end station is set at 1210 and the start station is set at 990. Note that the bridge layout line is longer than the actual bridge.
24
For this example four interior beams will be specied and the size of the bridge girders will be assigned as W36X230. No other changes to this deck template will be made. The bridge deck section will be given the default name of BSEC1.
PART II.
STEEL B RIDGE
25
It will be important for the SAP2000 bridge user to become familiar with each of the Bridge Object Assignment. Several of the assignment options will be used in this example but the SAP2000 user is encouraged to explore the range of denitions that are possible.
26
The spine model of BOBJ1 can be viewed in its extruded form using the View>Set Display Options command and checking the Extruded option. The following image can be rotated and displayed as follows:
PART II.
STEEL B RIDGE
27
At this stage of model creation the center bent has only a single column support and the end abutment is dened as a single point restraint. The center bent has horizontal girder located ush with the deck instead of being offset vertically. The bent and abutments will be further modied such that additional columns will be added to the bent and point restraints will be added to each of the wide ange supports at the abutment.
28
All the translational and rotational degrees of freedom are set to xed except the translation in the U2 direction. Additionally, the horizontal location of the abutment supports is set to each girder location. Diaphragms are added at the abutment by selecting the include vertical diaphragm option.
PART II.
29
The reference point of the cap beam is set to 16.5ft which is half the width of the 33ft wide deck section. The number of columns is set to 3 and the vertical diaphragms are included. To dene the column heights and locations the Modify/Show Column Data button needs to be selected. upon doing so the following dialog box is displayed:
30
The column locations are set to 4, 16.5 and 29 with heights of 24, 27 and 30ft.
Using the Chord and Brace option and using a W8X10 as the chord and brace member sizes, the BDIA1 properties are modied.
PART II.
31
From this dialog box the Modify/Show Bents button can be selected and a value of -5ft can be assigned to the vertical offset of the bent. Similarly, the Modify/Show Cross Diaphragms button can be selected to add cross diaphragms at 25ft along span1 and 25ft along span2.
32
Not that the spine model above does not show the cross diaphragms. Updating the linked bridge model as an area object model produces the following model:
PART II.
33
The SAP2000 program has, as a default, an analysis case already dened DEAD and MODAL. Running the model at this time will produce results for each of these default analysis cases. With the linked bridge model dened as a spine model the frame member bending moments can be displayed as follows:
Unlocking the model and changing the linked bridge model to area objects, the BOBJ1 model can be rerun. Below left are the F11 shell resultant forces. Below right the frame member M33 moments are displayed.
34
PART II.
35
The rst of two lanes is dened as having an end station of 1100ft and a beginning station of 1000ft. the width of the lane is set at 12ft with an offset of 8ft and the color is set to a shade of blue. The Lane Load Discretization is set at 5ft along the span and 10ft across the span. The second lane is dened as a copy of the rst with an offset of -16ft. The BOBJ1 can be shown with the lanes visible using the Display>Show Lanes command.
36
The SAP2000 Bridge Module has a variety of predened auto, truck and train vehicles. These can be found using the Bridge>Vehicles command. For this example the HS2044, HS2044l and AML vehicles will be selected and be added as General Vehicles as shown below:
Now that the vehicles have been dened the vehicles need to be assigned to a vehicle class. This is necessary in order to have the vehicles assigned to a specic analysis case which will be assign later. Using the Bridge>Vehicle Class command the three general vehicles are assigned to a vehicle class names HS.
PART II.
37
In the dialog box below the Analysis Case Name is set to MOVE1, the Analysis Case Type is set to Moving Load and the Vehicle Class is set to HS. Every permutation of vehicle classes operating in trafc lanes that is permitted by the entries in this table will be considered in the analysis.
38
With the MOVE1 analysis case now dened the model can be run. If the model is run as a spine model (See previous Section xx)and a combination COMB1 is dened as DEAD plus MOVE1 the resulting M3 moments can be displayed.
PART II.
39
With the MOVE1 analysis case now dened the model can be run. If the model is run as a spine model (See previous Section xx)and a combination COMB1 is dened as DEAD plus MOVE1 the resulting M3 moments can be displayed.
With the MOVE1 analysis case now dened the model can be run. If the model is run as a spine model (See previous Section xx)and a combination COMB1 is dened as DEAD plus MOVE1 the resulting M3 moments can be displayed.
40
It is recommended that the new SAP2000 Bridge User spend some time reviewing the analysis results for the MOVE1 load case and examine various individual member forces and stresses. The user can compare this results of this model with the results of the Steel Bridge PR model that has been provided. Upon completion of the analysis the current model should be saved as Steel Bridge 3
PART II.
41
The menu above allows the user to assign a specic vehicle to a specic lane traveling with a specic direction starting at a specic time. For the load case dened named moving, three trucks are set in motion, two in lane one and one in lane two, with the start times of 0, 7 and 3 seconds. The speeds are dened as 44, 44 and 22 feet per second and the truck in lane two has been assigned a backward direction. Below, a second loads case is given the name move and consists of three vehicles assigned to lane one with staggered start times of 0, 5 and 9 sec. The speeds are different for each vehicle with the assignments of 44,88 and 176 feet per second.
Next, the analysis cases are dened using the Dene>Analysis Cases command. The move case and the moving case are added to the existing DEAD, MODAL and
42
MOVE1 cases using the Add New Case command. For the moving case the Analysis Case Type is set to Multi-step Static. This analysis case will produce an analysis result for each step of the applied load as it has been dened in the Load Case denition.
The analysis case move will be analyzed using a time-history analysis method. This will allow the user to examine the vibratory response of the bridge for each of the trucks which are traveling at different speeds. To dene the time-history case the following dialog box is modied as follows:
PART II.
43
For the time-history load case a damping value of 2% has been specied by selecting the Damping>ShowModify button and assigning the values as:
To view the shell stresses for the moving load case the SAP2000 user can use the Display>Show Forces/Stresses>Shells and selecting the moving load case, F11 resultant forces with the multivalued option set to step 1 the graphic display will show the unstressed bridge deck. To see the deck stresses the user can simply step through the various analysis output steps that SAP has saved as part of the multistepped analysis. Stepping through the F11 force graphic shows the following:
44
In lieu of stepping through the output manually, the SAP2000 user can create an AVI or movie le. This is done by selecting the File>Create Viedo>Create Multi-step Animation Video. When the following window appears the user needs to select the moving load case. The image below was created with a magnication of 10 and a speed of 10 frames per second.
PART II.
45
To view the time-history results the SAP2000 user can use the Display>Show Plot Functions command.
46
After selecting a joint, in this case joint 144, the following dialog box is used to select the move load case and dene the desired plot function. For this example the U2 displacements are plotted below:
This plot shows the third vehicle, t=9sec, inducing a larger dynamic response than the
PART II.
47
Before proceeding with changes to the model it is recommended that the current model now be saved as Steel Bridge 4. If necessary this model can be compared to the model provided. Adding the two narrower bridge extensions will consist of dening a new free abutment, dening an additional bridge deck section, dening a new curved layout line, modifying BOBJ1 and adding two new bridge objects. These steps can be broken down as follows: 1. Using the Bridge>Abutments command add a new abutment with the name AbutFree. Set all restraint degrees of freedom to free 2. Add a new bridge deck using the same bridge template as before except that the width of the deck is dened as 18 feet wide and the number of interior girders used is set to one. Offset the Insertion Pt in the local-y dir by 9ft. 3. Add copy of Bent1 and call it Bent2. Edit the width to be 15ft, the reference point set at 7.5ft and a single column located at 7.5ft with a height of 27ft. 4. Add a copy of the Layout Line 1 and name it BLL2. The Quick Start button can be used and the Curved Right option should be selected. The Initial Y dimension needs to be set at -18ft. 5. Modify BOBJ1 as follows:
48
6. Add copy of BOBJ1 and name it BOBJ2 and modify as follows: 1. Span4 Span to Abutment @ 1200 Abut5 2. Span3 Spans to Bent @ 1145 Bent4 3. Split Start @ 1100 Split 4. Modify Spans: Set spans to the BSEC2 property 5. Modify Abutments: Assign the AbutFree property ABUT2 6. Modify Bents: Assign BENT to have a horizontal offset of 9ft and a drop of -5 7. Modify Diaphragms: Add BDIA1 to Span3 @ 22.4 and Span4 @ 27.5. The BOBJ2 dialog box should appear as follows:
PART II.
49
7. Add a copy of BOBJ1 and name it BOBJ3 with the following modications: a. Split, Start @ 1100 Split b. Span3, Span to Bent @ 1145 Bent2 c. Span4, Span to Abutment @ 1200 Abut5 d. Modify Spans, change to BSEC2 e. Modify Abutments, change to ABUT2, ABUT1 f. Modify bents, change to BENT2 @ 9, -5 g. Modify diaphragms, properties BDIA1, Span3 @ 22.5, Span4 @ 27.5 h. Update Bridge model and mesh at 5ft
50
i. Modify Superelevations, BBL2 to have 0 @ 1100 and 10% @ 1200 When the edits above are completed the BOBJ3 dialog box should appear as follows:
PART II.
51
52
With the bridge complete the user can run the nal bridge conguration and look at the analysis results.
PART III
cablestayed Bridge
53
54
This bridge model is intended to demonstrate the SAP2000 Staged Construction Analysis using a cablestayed bridge as an illustrative example. This example provides a step-by-step tutorial for the staged construction analysis case. A copy of the input le can be obtained from Computer and Structures, Inc.
PART III.
C ABLESTAYED B RIDGE
55
56
The Show Advanced Material Properties box needs to be selected to provide the user with the option to dene the Advanced Material Property Data. For this example the Time Dependent Properties option was selected which gives the user the following dialog box:
PART III.
C ABLESTAYED B RIDGE
57
The cable diameter is specied as 0.05 meters. The cable properties are calculated using the specied diameter. Similarly, the cable properties can be determined if the user species the cable area.
58
PART III.
C ABLESTAYED B RIDGE
59
With the pylon placed into the model the model will appear as follows:
60
The offset nodes that will be used to connect the cables to the bridge deck can be drawn using the Draw Special Joint command. An offset of 3 m and -3 m in the ydirection can be used to create a single pair of nodes located at x=-90 m. Next, a rigid link can be drawn connecting each of these nodes to the deck node at x=-90 m. Using the Replicate command, these nodes and links can be replicated in the x-direction 18 times to provide points of connection for the cable elements. The replicate command will create a pair of nodes and links at the pylon as well but this particulat pair of nodes and links are not needed and should be deleted. The deck, nodes and links now look like follows:
PART III.
C ABLESTAYED B RIDGE
61
Next, the draw special joint command can be used to place nine special joints along the upper portion of the pylon. These special joints are to be located 2 m apart with the uppermost special joint located 4 m from the top of the pylon. Using the offset command, the rst special joint can be drawn 4 m below the top of the pylon and the other 8 joints can be easily replicated with a spacing of 2 m. With the special joints in place the cable elements can now be drawn. For this example a cable diameter of 0.05 m was used. Using the Draw Frame/ Cable Element command, the cables can be added by snapping to the start and end joint of each cable and inserting the appropriate parameters. After the end node is selected the following dialog box appears:
62
Specifying the Cable Type as Tension At I-End allows the user to control the initial drape of the cable. A tension amount must be specied if this option is selected. The cable element uses an elastic catenary formulation to represent the behavior of a slender element under self weight, temperature and strain loading. This behavior is highly nonlinear and inherently includes p-delta and large displacement geometry. It is highly recommended that the user read the Cable Element chapter in the Analysis Reference Manual.
PART III.
C ABLESTAYED B RIDGE
63
64
Using the Select command and the Assign/ Dene Group Names command the user can dene all ten pairs of deck and cable groups along with a group named, Pylon, that contains only the pylon element for a total of eleven groups.
PART III.
C ABLESTAYED B RIDGE
65
66
For this example, the nonlinear creep and shrinkage effects are included in the analysis. If desired, the creep effects can be studied for the for any period of time after completion of the structure. This can be done by adding additional stages having the Duration input specifying the appropriate number of days. In this example stage 12 is aged 10 additional days. Stage 18 that is aged 10000 additional days. Stages 13 through 17 vary from 30 to 3000 days bringing the total number of days that the model is aged to 14,473 days.
APPENDIX
A PPENDIX A
Mesh Transitioning and Compatibility The Automated Line Constraint
Ashraf Habibullah1 , S.E. M. Iqbal Suharwardy2 , S.E., Ph.D.
A.1
Introduction
In the application of the Finite Element Analysis Method, the most time consuming task is usually the creation and modication of the nite element mesh of the system. Not to mention the fact that creation of mesh transitions from coarse to ne meshes can be very tedious. Also matching up node points to create compatible meshes at intersecting planes, such as walls and oors can be very labor intensive. And even if the mesh generation is automated the mesh transitioning usually produces irregular or skewed elements that may perform poorly. This may have adverse effects on the design, especially in regions of stress concentration, such as in the vicinity of intersecting planes. The object based modeling environment of ETABS & SAP2000 clearly addresses these time-consuming shortcomings of the Finite Element Method. In the object-based modeling environment the Engineer generates the structural model by creating only a few large area objects that physically dene the structural units such as wall panels, oors or ramps. The nite element mesh is not explicitly created by the user, but is automatically generated by assigning meshing parameters to the area objects. These parameters may include variables, such as mesh size, mesh spacing and mesh grading among others. With this capability the engineer can study the effects of mesh renement by just dening a few control parameters. The new model with the desired level of renement is thus created with minimal effort. If the meshes on common edges of adjacent area objects do not match up, automated line constraints are generated along those edges. These Line Constraints enforce displacement compatibility between the mismatched meshes of adjacent objects and eliminate the need for mesh transition elements.
1 President 2 Director
& CEO, Computers & Structures, Inc. of Research & Development, Computers & Structures, Inc.
69
70
What makes this technology really powerful is that while making modications to the model the Engineer need only be concerned about the few large physical objects of the structure. The modied nite element analytical model gets recreated automatically with any changes to the base objects. The following examples are designed to illustrate the power and practicality of this technology.
A.2
As illustrated in Figure A.1, this is a model of a simply supported plate, which has been modeled in two different ways. In one case the mesh is uniform across the plate and in the other case the mesh is ne on one half of the plate and coarse on the other half of the plate. In the latter case, an interpolating line constraint is automatically generated to enforce displacement compatibility between the adjacent halves of the plate where the mesh does not match. As shown in the gure, correlation between the two models is very good.
A PPENDIX A.
71
A.3
This example, Figure A.2, illustrates the use of Line Constraints to capture the interaction of a curved shear wall supporting a curved ramp. Notice that there are no joints at the points where the ramp element edges intersect the wall element edges. Displacement compatibility along the lines of intersection of the ramp and the wall is enforced automatically by the generation of Line Constraints along those lines. Notice how the application of Line Constraints allows the wall and ramp mesh to retain a simple rectangular (or quadrilateral) conguration. A conventional nite element model would be very irregular because it would need all the additional joints (and corresponding elements) to allow for the ramp element and wall element edge intersections.
A.4
This example, Figure A.3, illustrates a 3D Concrete Flat Plate Building with shear walls and an elevator core. Again, in this model, Line Constraints automatically appear at the lines where the oor and wall objects intersect. This, of course, as in previous examples, will enforce displacement compatibility when mesh geometries do not match. As shown in the deformed shape of the Elevator Core, in many places the wall meshing does not match the oor meshing. All elements meeting at common edges, however, still show no displacement incompatibilities, even though the element nodes do not coincide.
A.5
This example, Figure A.4, models a Shear wall Spandrel System, illustrating mesh transitioning from the spandrel to the shear wall. Line Constraints are generated as needed in any direction. In this case the Line Constraints are vertical as well as horizontal.
72
A PPENDIX A.
73
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Computers and Structures Inc. [2006a], ETABS Three Dimensional Analysis of Building Systems, Berkeley, California. Technical Reference Manual. Computers and Structures Inc. [2006b], SAP2000 Integrated Structural Analysis and Design Software, Berkeley, California. Technical Reference Manual. Computers and Structures Inc. [2006c], Website, www.computersandstructures.com. See the latest web contents.
75
Robert Tovani, PE, SE: Robert Tovani has twenty-ve years of experience in structural analysis, design, project management, and construction administration. He is currently president of Engineering Analysis Corporation and an employee of Computer and Structures, Inc. Mr. Tovani received his Bachelors and Masters of Science Degrees for the University of California, Berkeley and is licensed in California as a Civil and Structural Engineer. Mr. Tovani has developed an extensive background in computer-aided analysis and design. His analysis background includes work on a variety of structures using linear and nonlinear analysis of new and existing structures in static and dynamic loading environments. He has developed computer models on high rise structures in excess of 100 stories and has provided design work on a variety of structural framing types including base isolation and other complex framing systems. Mr. Tovani has been using the SAP and ETABS computer programs for over twenty-ve years and has worked at CSI providing training, analysis and modeling assistance to CSI and Engineering Analysis clients. Recently, Mr. Tovani has provided detailed SAP2000 Bridge Training Seminars. Atif Habibullah, PE: Atif Habibullah has extensive experience using CSI products, having worked in CSIs Software Support department for ve years. For the past two years, Atif has helped instruct engineers through CSI Educational Services training seminars. He has a strong background in modeling a variety of structural systems, solving special modeling problems and in the interpretation of analysis results. Prior to working at CSI, Atif worked at a leading design rm for 4 years using CSI products, particularly in the design of multi-story steel and concrete building structures such as hospitals, ofce buildings, towers, bridges, stadiums and dams.
77