0% found this document useful (0 votes)
210 views1 page

Mult Comp

This document summarizes several important multiple comparisons procedures for analyzing differences between means from multiple treatment groups: 1) Least Significant Difference (LSD) compares means to a threshold based on a t-distribution. 2) Sidak correction provides a tighter bound than Bonferroni by adjusting the critical value of significance. 3) Stepdown Bonferroni assigns adjusted p-values in order from smallest to largest. 4) Scheffe's method and Tukey's procedure compare means to critical values based on an F-distribution and studentized range statistic respectively to control familywise error rate.

Uploaded by

Héctor Yendis
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
210 views1 page

Mult Comp

This document summarizes several important multiple comparisons procedures for analyzing differences between means from multiple treatment groups: 1) Least Significant Difference (LSD) compares means to a threshold based on a t-distribution. 2) Sidak correction provides a tighter bound than Bonferroni by adjusting the critical value of significance. 3) Stepdown Bonferroni assigns adjusted p-values in order from smallest to largest. 4) Scheffe's method and Tukey's procedure compare means to critical values based on an F-distribution and studentized range statistic respectively to control familywise error rate.

Uploaded by

Héctor Yendis
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Statistics 850 Clayton January 29, 2004

Some Important Multiple Comparisons Procedures


In the following, suppose there are k treatments, let r =
_
k
2
_
, and let t
ii
=
y
i
y
i

2/n
.
Least Signicant Dierence
Compare t
ii
to T
dfErr,/2
. This is equivalent to comparing | y
i
y
i

| to T
dfErr,/2
s

_
2/n.
Sidak
Like Bonferroni, but use CER = 1 (1 )
1/r
. This produces a bound that is slightly tighter than
Bonferroni.
A Stepdown Bonferroni p-value
Put the unadjusted p-values in order from smallest to largest: p
1
< p
2
< < p
r
. The adjusted
p-values are p
1
= min{1, rp
1
}; p
2
= min{1, max{ p
1
, (r 1)p
2
}}; p
3
= min{1, max{ p
2
, (r 2)p
3
}}; etc
Schee
Compare |t
ii
| to
_
(k 1)F
k1,dfErr,
. Equivalently, compare | y
i
y
i

| to
_
(k 1)F
k1,dfErr,
s

_
2/n.
Schees result can be extended to contrasts:
P
_
k

1
c
i

i

k

1
c
i

Y
i

_
(k 1)F
k1,dfErr,
s

c
2
i
/n
i
c s.t. c

1 = 0
_
= 1
Tukey
Compare | y
i
y
i

| to Q
k,dfErr,
s

_
1/n where Q is chosen such that
P
_
max
i,i

|(

Y
i

i
) (

Y
i


i
)|
s

n
Q
_
= 1
This method also works for contrasts: P
_

k
1
c
i

i


k
1
c
i

Y
i
Qs

k
1
|c
i
|/2 c s.t. c

1 = 0
_
=
1
Student-Newman-Keuls
Same as Tukey for means separations, except, for a subset of size m, use Q
m,dfErr,
.
Duncans New Multiple Range Test
Like SNK, but for a group of size m, use Q
m,dfErr,m
where
m
= 1 (1 )
m1
.
Fishers Least Signicant Dierence
Also called a Protected LSD: rst perform the F test in ANOVA, and proceeds with LSD means
comparisons only if the F test is signicant.
Hayter
Like Fishers LSD, rst do the F test. If it rejects H
0
, then use Tukeys method to compare means,
but use Q
k1
instead of Q
k
.
References
Hsu, J. C., 1996, Multiple Comparisons. Theory and Methods
Miller, R. G., 1981, Simultaneous Statistical Inference (Second Edition)
1

You might also like