Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 16 views

    Groups Count Sum Average Variance

    Uploaded by

    Sivanesan Nadarajah
    The document appears to analyze usage data by gender for various campus locations including the cafeteria, hostel, and FK. It performs an ANOVA test to determine if usage is equally distributed between genders across locations. The ANOVA results show no significant difference, so the null hypothesis that genders equally use locations is not rejected. A regression analysis further supports no relationship between gender and location usage.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Groups Count Sum Average Variance

    Uploaded by

    Sivanesan Nadarajah
    16 views7 pages
    The document appears to analyze usage data by gender for various campus locations including the cafeteria, hostel, and FK. It performs an ANOVA test to determine if usage is equally distributed between genders across locations. The ANOVA results show no significant difference, so the null hypothesis that genders equally use locations is not rejected. A regression analysis further supports no relationship between gender and location usage.

    Original Title

    RND

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document appears to analyze usage data by gender for various campus locations including the cafeteria, hostel, and FK. It performs an ANOVA test to determine if usage is equally distributed between genders across locations. The ANOVA results show no significant difference, so the null hypothesis that genders equally use locations is not rejected. A regression analysis further supports no relationship between gender and location usage.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    16 views7 pages

    Groups Count Sum Average Variance

    Uploaded by

    Sivanesan Nadarajah
    The document appears to analyze usage data by gender for various campus locations including the cafeteria, hostel, and FK. It performs an ANOVA test to determine if usage is equally distributed between genders across locations. The ANOVA results show no significant difference, so the null hypothesis that genders equally use locations is not rejected. A regression analysis further supports no relationship between gender and location usage.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 7

    Gender Usage Location Cafeteria Hostel FK

    Male 8 12 6

    Female 9 11 6

    H0: All the two genders of the first year students in Unisel are equally using the specified locations Ha: Not all genders are equally using the specified locations

    Anova: Single Factor SUMMARY Groups Male Female

    Count 3 3

    Sum 26 26

    Average Variance 8.666667 9.333333 8.666667 6.333333

    ANOVA Source of Variation Between Groups Within Groups Total

    SS 0 31.33333 31.33333

    df 1 4 5

    MS 0 7.833333

    F 0

    P-value 1

    F crit 7.708647422

    Conclusion: We do not reject H0 because F is less than F critical. The usage of specified location is not sign

    cified locations

    of specified location is not significantly different.

    Gender Usage Location Cafeteria Taska Outside FK

    Male 4 10 6 5

    Female 6 12 2 7

    Total 10 22 8 12

    Severity 20 44 16 24

    SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Multiple R 1 R Square 1 Adjusted R Square 1 Standard Error 1.776E-15 Observations 3 ANOVA Regression Residual Total df 1 1 2 SS 416 3.15544E-30 416 MS F Significance F 416 1.32E+32 5.54452E-17 3.16E-30

    Intercept 10

    Coefficients Standard Error 7.105E-15 2.64549E-15 2 1.74186E-16

    t Stat P-value Lower 95% 2.685865 0.226903 -2.65087E-14 1.15E+16 5.54E-17 2

    RESIDUAL OUTPUT Observation 1 2 3 Predicted 20 44 16 24 Residuals 0 -3.55271E-15 0

    PROBABILITY OUTPUT Percentile 16.66667 50 83.33333 20 16 24 44

    10 Residual Plot
    0 5 10 15 20 25

    Residuals
    -4E-15

    10

    Normal Probability Plot


    Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0% 4.072E-14 -2.6509E-14 4.072E-14 2 2 2
    60

    20

    40 20 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 Sample Percentile

    10 Line Fit Plot


    60

    20

    40 20 0 0 5 10 10 15 20 25 Series1 Predicted 20

    redicted 20

    Gender Food Variety Mixed Rice Nasi Ayam/Goreng Breakfast Items Snacks Drinks

    Male 2 1 2 5 6

    Female 3 2 1 7 7

    F-Test Two-Sample for Variances Variable 1 3.2 4.7 5 4 0.5875 0.30950413 0.15653781 Variable 2 4 8 5 4

    Mean Variance Observations df F P(F<=f) one-tail F Critical one-tail

    Gender Male Female

    Male 2 1

    Female 3 2

    Dinner

    You might also like