Chapter 5
Chapter 5
Chapter V
5.3
Hyderabad is characterized by a very significant presence of the urban poor, with a growing poverty profile. Slum settlements have multiplied over decades and the living conditions of the poor have not improved. Environm ental decline, vehicular pollution, inadequate basic services and infrastructure in the poor settlements hit the poor hardest. Slums are scattered across the city and surrounding municipalities, with high population densities and the number of people inhabiting them estimated to be around two million. It is estimated that more than half of these slums are on private land, and the rest on lands belonging to various public entities.
67
Poverty has a visible gender dimension too. The incidence of poverty among women is higher and female-headed households constitute the poorest of poor. The number of slums and slum population in Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad has been increasing at a faster pace over the decades. In addition, in the municipalities around the MCH constituting the Hyderabad Urban Agglomeration (HUA), there are around 500 slums. As these municipalities were constituted only in the late 1980s the slum population is high. For example in Quthbullahpur, Alwal and Rajendranagar they constitute about 60% of the total population underpinning the enormity of the problem. Their slum populations are presented in Table.5.2. In the HUA area, as can be seen from Table 5.2, there are 1631 slums with an approximate population of 2.0 million which are not concentric at a particular location. They are spatially spread all over the HUA area, which is a cause for concern and requires appropriate strategies. Another concern is that sereval of them are non-notified making it difficult for the provision of infrastructure and other services on sustainable basis. Some of the slums in the MCH area are very old established more than five decades ago and continue to suffer deprivations. Table 5.2: Slum Population in MCH Surrounding Municipalities Town MCH Serilingampally Kukatpally Quthbullahpur Alwal Malkajgiri Kapra Uppal Kalan LBNagar Rajendranagar Total
Source: ULBs
Slum Population (2001) 1411000 73866 19585 138360 62585 47396 47064 43586 23478 84287 1951207
% of Slum Population 38.83 49.07 6.74 61.27 58.81 27.08 29.57 36.86 8.96 58.87 37.47
The poor, not only habitat in slums of HUA area but are spread in squatter and informal settlements in small groups deprived of basic services. This makes them more vulnerable to vagries of nature and threat of eviction. There is no record of data on the number of such settlements and their population.
5.4
5.4.1 Communities
Slum population in HUA is heterogeneous in character - with Hindus, Muslims and Christians having migrated from different neighbouring districts, which once formed part of the erstwhile Nizam's dominion. Languages predominantly spoken in slums in Hyderabad and Secunderabad are Telugu and Urdu, followed by a smattering of Marathi and Kannada. Similar pattern exists in surrounding municipalities as well.
68
5.4.2 Literacy
As per the census 2001, the literacy rate of slum population was found to vary between 60 80%. Female literacy in slums varied from 52 - 73%. Table 5.3 gives the literacy status of slum population in MCH and surrounding municipalities. Table 5.3: Literacy among Slum Population Literacy Rate (2001) 72.5 63.75 72 73.5 80.29 75.34 69.55 73.05 63.67 60.15 Female Literacy Rate (2001) 65.94 55.79 63.48 64.62 72.38 67.38 59.37 63.14 53.25 51.66
Town MCH Serilingampally Kukatpally Quthbullahpur Alwal Malkajgiri Kapra Uppal Kalan LBNagar Rajendranagar
9% 30%
2% 55% 1% 3%
Own Land
69
slums in Hyderabad are gastro-enteritis, dysentery, liver enlargement, malnutrition, ringworm, scabies and other skin diseases. To overcome these hazards health infrastructure was developed and 64 urban primary health centres were established under IPP VIII. Most of the slum communities and the poor access the services from these centres. However in surrounding municipalities such facilities are not available.
Drinking Water Supply Piped Supply Km Drinking Water Supply Public Stand Posts No. (PSPs) LCS Units Community Centres Schools Water Supply Coverage Sanitation Facility Electricity No. No. No. % % %
About one third of the slums have individual service connections and the rest depend upon public taps. A significant feature s that despite 90% coverage of slum areas with water supply i lines, the individual service connections are less. Basic infrastructure facilities in the slum indicates that they are minimal and inadequate and need to be strengthened.
Anganwadi
1 2
93 107 200
Bala Jyothi 5 15 20
70
State Sponsored
ULBs Funds
71
As we shall see later, several government agencies and NGOs also implement programmes relating to education, health, welfare and others. Studies indicate that there is lack of coordination and convergence in programme implementation. There is need to bring all these efforts under a single authority to facilitate coordination and convergence and to avoid duplication of effort and resources. In addition to the above, the state government has taken up the following initiatives ?? Water supply connection to BPL families for Rs 1200 ?? Policy of spending 40 % of net municipal fund for improvement of slums ?? Notification of Un-notified Slums ?? Slum Improvement based on new Prioritised Matrix Approach ?? New citizen friendly street vendor policy The full impact of these new initiatives is yet to be seen as they were initiated only recently.
72
Linkages should be established between the UCD/UPA Cells and civil society and their role in poverty reduction should be clearly understood. Table 5.7 Indicative list of Institutions and Programmes S. No. 1 Institutions MCH/ULBs Programmes Implementation of poverty programmes Notification and denotification UCD Health and Sanitation Town Planning Infrastructure Issue of Pattas Provision of loans and subsidy for livelihoods Provision of loans and subsidy for livelihoods Provision of loans and subsidy for livelihoods House Development School education Health care and ICDS Welfare of backward sections Planning and development Primary health care Livelihoods and services Studies and surveys Training Impact assessment Policy advice and support Articulating needs and priorities Planning and implementation
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
District Collector Scheduled Caste Corporation Minorities Development Corporation Women Welfare Development Corporation Housing Corporation/Board Education Department Health Department Social Welfare Department HUDA, QQSUDA Urban Health Posts/Centres NGOs Research and Training Institutions
14
CBOs
In the urban agglomeration area effective coordination between the Corporation and ten municipalities will benefit both. Similarly, urban health centre in MCH should become the focal point for implementing the programmes. Similar system should be established in the surrounding municipalities as well. There is also need for convergence of programmes and coordination between UCD and UPA cells and government agencies, for effective targeting and better impact. In addition to ensuring better coordination across the public agencies, private sector and the civil society, it is recommended that a high level Task Force at the metropolitan city level should be set up with representatives of public sector, private sector and the civil society as the members. The Task Force should provide support for implementation of the action plans .
73
Key Challenges
In spite of several initiatives towards poverty alleviation there are several critical issues and challenges that need to be addressed. They Include: ? Lack of Dependable Data: Lack of dependable data on various aspects of poverty ? including number of slums, slum population, access to services like water and sanitation, livelihood, etc. ? Land Tenure: Land tenure continues to be a daunting issue in addressing the problems ? of the poor. People living in non-notified slums are most vulnerable, as they are not officially recognised. They are most vulnerable with no regular incomes, access to basic services absence of tenural rights, etc ? Infrastructure Deficiency: Deterioration of infrastructure created by investments under ? various slum improvement programs due to inadequate maintenance, finance and direction in the post-project phase resulting in poor quality of service availability to the residents in the already improved slums. The infrastructure created in slums is not linked to the citywide networks. With funds constraints, service provision for the poor becomes a sporadic activity rather than a regular service delivery system of local government. ? Absence of Integrated Response: The experience of implementing poverty ? programmes clearly brings out the need for an integrated response to deal with the problems of the urban poor. The experience highlights the fact that no sectoral intervention would mitigate the problems of the urban poor or improves their quality of life. It is also noted that programmes for the poor need to focus on particularly vulnerable groups among them, like women and children, disabled and destitute, the aged and children in difficult circumstances. Lack of coordination leads to inefficient use of resources. ? Neglect of Informal Settlement: Programs arte targeted mostly for notified and ? developed Slums. Lack of awareness of non-notified slums and de-notification policy for developed slums. ? Weak Municipal Resource Base: Poor resource base for creating and constantly ? maintaining infrastructure is a critical issue. As they depend on adhoc grants, the service provision for the poor becomes a sporadic activity rather than a regular service delivery system of local government institutions. ? Absence of Connectivity: The infrastructure created in slums is not linked to the ? citywide networks in all cases. ? Lack of co-ordination among various programs and institutions to addres s the ? problems in an integrated and meaningful way. ? Vulnerability: Programs for the poor need also to focus on vulnerable groups among ? them, like women and children, disabled and destitute, aged and children, etc.
74