IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AND PRIORITY PROJECT LIST

For The

KINNICKINNIC RIVER WATERSHED

Prepared by Kinnickinnic River Watershed Action Team November 2010

Table of Contents
Table of Contents.....................................................................................................................................................2 I. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.................................................................................................................................3 II. INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................................................3 Summary of 2010 Kinnickinnic River Watershed Implementation Plan Staging Timetable.................................4 III. KINNICKINNIC RIVER WATERSHED PROJECTS......................................................................................6 IV. KINNICKINNIC RIVER WATERSHED priority PROJECTS For 2011/2012...............................................12 V. NEXT STEPS....................................................................................................................................................24 VI. APPENDIX......................................................................................................................................................25

I. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Kinnickinnic River Watershed Action Team and Sweet Water (the Southeastern Wisconsin Watersheds Trust, Inc.) gratefully acknowledge the support of the Joyce Foundation and the work of all our partners and participants in completing this ambitious process. Thanks to everyone, the Kinnickinnic River Watershed Action Team is that much closer to making positive things happen for our communities and the lake and rivers on which we depend. II. INTRODUCTION This document is the product of a multi-year effort to collect scientific knowledge about the Kinnickinnic River Watershed in Southeastern Wisconsin, to distill that information into a comprehensive, five-year Watershed Restoration Plan (WRP) for the river, and to review and refine the WRP into a concise action plan for years 2011 and 2012. This document presents the action plan, outlining recommended high priority short-term watershed restoration actions and focusing in more detail on particular shortterm objectives that are now or soon to be underway. In 2007, the Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission (SEWRPC) and the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD), in collaboration with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR), completed the Regional Water Quality Management Plan Update partly to recommend the most cost-effective means of improving water quality over time. A Technical Advisory Committee made up of representatives of local and special-purpose units of government, agencies, academic institutions, and conservation organizations guided and reviewed the process to develop the regional water quality plan. In 2008, regional stakeholders created a collaborative, umbrella organization, the Southeastern Wisconsin Watersheds Trust, Inc. (called Sweet Water), to implement recommendations coming out of the Regional Water Quality Management Plan Update. In 2009, the MMSD began work on WRPs for the Menomonee and Kinnickinnic River watersheds that refined the information in the regional plan by identifying specific actions requiring implementation to improve water quality. During this process, the public provided input that helped make habitat and aesthetics a primary focus of the WRPs, along with the issues of bacteria/human health and nutrients/phosphorus. Sweet Water invited the public to regular meetings of the Kinnickinnic and Menomonee River Watershed Action Teams (WATs), at which the authors of the WRPs requested and incorporated feedback into the final WRPs. In the March through September 2010 timeframe, a total of 15 Watershed Action Team meetings were held in the two watersheds, attracting a total of 350 attendees. With the WRPs completed early in 2010, the Kinnickinnic and Menomonee River WATs have since been given the responsibility for developing and implementing on-the-ground projects. The outline below reviews the staging timetable that was utilized by Sweet Water and its many partners to examine the Kinnickinnic River WRP and then complete a mapping exercise whereby WAT members worked in a group setting with large-scale aerial maps of each sub-watershed. The mapping exercise served to identify localized opportunities to implement the Foundation Actions identified
3 Figure 1: Most impaired sub-watersheds in the Kinnickinnic River watershed.

in Chapter 7 of the WRP, and examined their implications in the most impaired sub-watersheds of the Kinnickinnic River. The most impaired sub-watersheds, which represent hot spots of pollutants, were determined by combining the highest ranked sub-watersheds generating amounts of fecal coliform, total suspended solids, and total phosphorus per acre of land. Summary of 2010 Kinnickinnic River Watershed Implementation Plan Staging Timetable April Sweet Water tested out sub-watershed mapping and WRP Foundation Action review exercises at the Kinnickinnic River WAT meeting. Activities focused on water quality measures and Foundation Actions for the most impaired sub-watershed, Holmes Avenue Creek (KK-5 on Figure 1). Approximately 22 people attended the meeting. May-July The Kinnickinnic River Watershed Action Team hosted meetings that brought key actors and stakeholders in the watershed together to conduct modified versions of the April mapping/action review process for the other 5 most impaired sub-watersheds. This method led the KK WAT to focus on Lyons Park Creek (KK-1), the Upper Kinnickinnic River mainstem (KK-3), Villa Mann Creek (KK-6), Wilson Park Creek (KK-8) and the Middle Kinnickinnic River mainstem (KK-10). The WAT produced maps identifying potential restoration actions and projects within each sub-watershed. Attendance at these meetings numbered from 16 to 23 participants. August The WAT co-chairs updated and sought input from the Sweet Water Science Committee on the process used to develop WRP implementation projects. September The Watershed Action Team co-chairs and Sweet Water met to distill the results of the mapping exercises for the sub-watersheds, with the goal being to project the discussions about the 6 most impaired sub-watersheds across the entire Kinnickinnic River system. Two WAT meetings were held in September. To finalize mapping and planning efforts, 10 people attended the first meeting. Comments from all sub-watershed mapping discussions were combined to produce a draft action summary for the watershed. Also, the Watershed Action Team co-chairs and Sweet Water met to identify WRP implementation projects and to incorporate projects into a draft implementation plan. Later in the month, 12 participants of the KK WAT met to provide final input to the draft action plan. During this timeframe, WAT members also met individually with local municipalities and key state agencies to discuss draft implementation plans and insure alignment with facility and program efforts at those levels. October The WAT co-chairs presented the draft implementation plan to the Sweet Water Science Committee to obtain feedback on the development and prioritization of implementation projects. The draft Implementation Plan was also presented to the Sweet Water Executive Steering Council on October 20 and later to the full WAT for consideration and refinement. November and Beyond The final Implementation Plan was presented to the full WAT for approval and to the Executive Steering Council. A formal adoption of the plan by the Sweet Water Steering Council is anticipated at its December meeting.
4

It is anticipated that regular Kinnickinnic WAT meetings will continue to be scheduled and publicized as this Implementation Plan is transformed into work in the watershed. Active community support is essential to the success of this effort. Following an operations and reporting procedure outlined more fully in Section V below, each WAT meeting will include a review of currently-underway projects, an update on near-term funding opportunities and planned follow up to those deadlines, and a regular review of the Implementation Plan components to determine if any listed projects are prime for adoption, given evolving partnership and funding arrangements.

III. KINNICKINNIC RIVER WATERSHED PROJECTS The table included on the following pages presents a consolidated listing of all projects and initiatives that emerged from the mapping exercise carried out at WAT meetings during the summer of 2010. WAT leaders worked to organize projects into 11 Project Categories that represent refinements to the three primary categories of recommendations contained within the KK WRP (Public Health/Bacteria, Instream & Aquatic Habitat and Nutrients). All projects listed below in bold have been determined to be higher priority projects that the Watershed Action Team, Sweet Water, and its partners will focus on implementing in 2011 and 2012. Priority projects chosen for earlyout implementation are described in Section IV of this document. Funding, availability of project partners, and other factors will ultimately determine which projects move forward. Higher priority projects chosen for early-out implementation are described later in Section IV of this document.
Project Category Data Collection & Mapping Data Collection & Mapping Assessment Area Project Description Establish data collection, management and analysis capacity in conjunction with MMSD, SEWRPC and UWM to meet Sweet Water project needs. Work with MMSD, Milwaukee County, Milwaukee, Greenfield, Cudahy, St. Francis, West Allis and West Milwaukee to collect GIS-based stormwater catchment area maps and public/private outfalls and integrate data into Sweet Water GIS platform. Identify and integrate parcel, property owner and land use/occupancy data into Sweet Water GIS platform. Survey recreational use of high priority areas throughout the watershed to determine risk of human exposure. High priority areas are likely to include portions of the river corridor that travel through Milwaukee County Parks and those areas that are in close proximity to residential areas. Work with WDOT and Milwaukee County (?) to determine Interstate 94, 894 and 43 stormwater catchment areas and discharge locations (KK-5, KK-6, KK-8, KK-10). Work with WDNR to collect industrial point source discharges and integrate data into Sweet Water GIS platform. Work to align citizen-based and institutional (NGO, academic and governmental) water quality monitoring capacity and activities with Sweet Water project needs.

Multiple

Data Collection & Mapping

Multiple

Data Collection & Mapping

Multiple

Data Collection & Mapping

Multiple

Data Collection & Mapping Data Collection & Mapping Data Collection & Mapping

Multiple Multiple Multiple

Project Category Data Collection & Mapping Pollutant Loading Analysis & Mitigation Pollutant Loading Analysis & Mitigation

Assessment Area KK-5

Project Description Work with Milwaukee County to determine Mitchell cargo terminal and remote parking stormwater catchment areas and discharge locations. Convene small technical group to develop a strategy that prioritizes find and fix activities based on results of recreational use surveys, data collection/mapping work and existing bacteria loading data. Review Milwaukee Riverkeeper outfall test results for the KK watershed and determine what retest/test activities are necessary. Utilize volunteer water quality monitors to identify dry weather discharges at storm sewers throughout the watershed. Identify and implement activities to support municipal efforts at "find and fix" activities Evaluate DNR WPDES Discharge data to determine public health risk issues and determine a strategy to address risks. Organize community-based river cleanups to address debris and litter issues. Work to support Milwaukee County/Mitchell Airport efforts to mitigate pollutant loading resulting from aircraft deicing operations

Multiple

Pollutant Loading Analysis & Mitigation Pollutant Loading Analysis & Mitigation Pollutant Loading Analysis & Mitigation Pollutant Loading Analysis & Mitigation Pollutant Loading Analysis & Mitigation Pollutant Loading Analysis & Mitigation Stormwater Management & Green Infrastructure

Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple KK-4

Project Category

Assessment Area

Stormwater Management & Green Infrastructure

Multiple

Project Description Based on sewershed and stormwater catchment area mapping and parcel data, determine priority stormwater catchment areas for clustered green infrastructure applications to manage stormwater quantity and quality. High priority areas may include the following- KK-1: Commercial properties at 60th and Oklahoma, City of Milwaukees Smart Street plan for Oklahoma and Maple Leaf Circle housing development; KK-3: Alverno College, City of Milwaukee DPW facilities and rail yard; KK-6: S. 27th Street Corridor (commercial big box), Greenfield Public Schools and Barnard Park, Interstate 43/894 Corridor; KK-8: Westgate Shopping Center, 27th Street corridor, St. Lukes Hospital and Interstate; KK-10: Chase/Howell Ave. commercial corridor, S. 5th Street/Place industrial properties and Interstate corridor; Watershed-wide: Appropriate residential areas (i.e. basins), public and private school facilities and other institutional facilities throughout watershed. Work with Milwaukee County to help meet County-wide NR 216 stormwater management requirements. Work to support Milwaukee County/Mitchell Airport efforts to address TSS loading and stormwater treatment tied to runway expansion projects Work to support Milwaukee County/Mitchell Airport efforts to address TSS loading and stormwater treatment tied to redevelopment of Air National Guard facility Work with WDOT to maximize performance of stormwater management in the Airport Spur reconstruction project. Industrial park/properties, I-94 and Airport Spur Corridor, Mitchell Airport facilities (cargo terminal and remote parking lots), American Rivers-affiliated sites and the Holler Park Neighborhood Association target area. Work with WDOT to maximize performance of stormwater management in the Loomis Rd/HWY36 reconstruction project. Work with WDOT to maximize performance of stormwater management in the S. 27th St/HWY41 reconstruction project.
8

Stormwater Management & Green Infrastructure Stormwater Management & Green Infrastructure

Multiple KK-4

Stormwater Management & Green Infrastructure Stormwater Management & Green Infrastructure

KK-4 KK-5

Stormwater Management & Green Infrastructure

KK-5

Stormwater Management & Green Infrastructure Stormwater Management & Green Infrastructure

KK-7 KK-8

Project Category Stormwater Management & Green Infrastructure Stormwater Management & Green Infrastructure Stormwater Management & Green Infrastructure Reduced Chlorides Reduced Chlorides

Assessment Area KK-8 KK-10 KK-11

Project Description Work with WDOT to maximize performance of stormwater management in the Howell Ave/HWY38 reconstruction project. Investigate Bay View Neighborhood Association downspout disconnect program and determine ability to expand/replicate in other parts of the watershed. Implement Residential BMPs in the 6th to 16th St stretch in conjunction with KK Corridor Neighborhood Plan Convene multi-jurisdiction task force to compile local best practices for salt application Identify high priority areas for applying chloride BMPs. (e.g. appropriate residential areas (i.e. basins), Milwaukee County Parks, public and private school facilities and other institutional facilities throughout watershed) Establish a methodology to prioritize and implement riparian buffer enhancement opportunities. Milwaukee County Parks will be a critical partner in much of this work. High priority areas may include the following- KK-1: Lyons Park and adjacent upstream/downstream areas; KK-2: KK River Parkway; KK-3: Jackson Park (noting erosion issues) and adjacent upstream/downstream areas; KK-6: Downstream portion of Villa Mann Creek; KK-8: Areas to be addressed by MMSD Wilson Park Creek flood management project; KK-10/KK-11: MMSD flood management and channel rehabilitation project and downstream area to Lincoln Ave. Partner with DNR, Milwaukee County, MMSD and municipalities to design and implement streambank stabilization projects consistent with the priorities identified in MMSD's forthcoming KK Watershed Sediment Transport Study Work with Milwaukee County Parks and Department of Transportation & Public Works to identify areas to minimize turf mowing adjacent to surface water bodies.

Multiple

Reduced Chlorides Riparian Buffer Restoration/Channel Enhancements

Multiple

Riparian Buffer Restoration/Channel Enhancements

Multiple

Riparian Buffer Restoration/Channel Enhancements

Multiple

Riparian Buffer Restoration/Channel Enhancements

Multiple

Project Category

Assessment Area

Riparian Buffer Restoration/Channel Enhancements

KK-2

Project Description Partner with Village of West Milwaukee to initiate conceptual design & preliminary engineering for the 43rd Street Ditch west of Miller Park Way, and explore redevelopment opportunities for the auto salvage facility at 4798 W. Burnham St to serve as a connector from West Milwaukee Park to 43rd Street Ditch Initiate the preliminary engineering for concrete removal/channel rehabilitation in the 27th St to Jackson Park stretch, including fish passage objectives Design and implement aquatic and terrestrial habitat improvements in the I-94 to Becher St. stretch Increase access in conjunction with City of Milwaukee Kinnickinnic River Trail Project, Washington St - 6th St Increase access in conjunction with MMSD flood management project, Chase Ave - 27th St Evaluate the results of Sweet Water Household Survey (fall 2010) and develop public education programming that responds to the identified needs. Develop a watershed-wide educational outreach program that increases awareness of pet waste contributions to pollution loading. Work with Milwaukee County Parks to provide pet litter management supplies and signage in high traffic areas within park system. Education and outreach to general public regarding stormwater management, household hazardous waste and water quality. Consider Northeast Wisconsin Stormwater Collaborative (NEWSC) approach to public education. Utilize extensive network of neighborhood associations to disseminate water resource educational information.

Riparian Buffer Restoration/Channel Enhancements Riparian Buffer Restoration/Channel Enhancements Recreational Access Improvements Recreational Access Improvements Recreational Access Improvements Education Education

KK-3 KK-11

KK-10, KK11 KK-9, KK-10, KK-11

Multiple

Education

Multiple

Education

Multiple

Education

Multiple

Education Fish Passage/Habitat Improvements

Multiple

10

Project Category Fish Passage/Habitat Improvements Reduced Nutrient Inputs Reduced Nutrient Inputs Science/Research Science/Research

Assessment Area

Project Description

Multiple

Work with Milwaukee County Parks and Department of Transportation & Public Works to identify areas to reduce fertilizer application and migration to surface water bodies. Research an appropriate strategy for the use of alternative indicators to help identify and eliminate human sources of bacteria to the rivers, lake, and beaches. Collect and analyze in-stream bacteroides data across the hydrograph, in order to better measure progress of reducing and eliminating human sources of bacteria in the future. Pursue opportunities to further municipal progress toward meeting their NR 151/216 mandate to reduce total suspended solids (TSS) inputs to the Kinnickinnic River system via trading of TSS reduction credits between municipalities. Engage stakeholders through Sweet Waters Watershed Action Teams in the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage Districts processes to create TMDLs and implementation plans for bacteria, phosphorus, and sediment in the Kinnickinnic River watershed, in hopes of enhancing efforts to further improve water quality through the TMDL effort in parallel with Watershed Restoration Plan implementation efforts.

Multiple

Science/Research Policy Policy

Multiple

Multiple

Policy

Multiple

11

IV. KINNICKINNIC RIVER WATERSHED PRIORITY PROJECTS FOR 2011/2012 The priority projects below were developed from the process described in the introduction and listed in Section III of this document. The projects target recommended actions in strategic locations to effectively implement the Kinnickinnic River Watershed Restoration Plan. This list does not represent all of the actions needed to show water quality improvements watershed-wide, nor are the Priority Projects ranked in any way. Additionally, a number of the projects described below refer to work that will be carried out to address needs in the Kinnickinnic and Menomonee Watersheds. Going forward, Sweet Water will seek to refine the process of further project development, as well as project implementation. 1. Title: Timeline: Establish data collection, management and analysis capacity in conjunction with MMSD, SEWRPC and UWM to meet Sweet Water project needs. Fall 2010-ongoing

Key partners: MMSD, SEWRPC, and University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Estimated Costs: $21,000 per year

Funding Sources: Current funding - Sweet Water, $4,000 Potential funding - Wisconsin Coastal Management Program, $17,000 Project Category Addressed: Data Collection & Mapping Project Summary: Working with the limited funds Sweet Water currently has at its disposal, the Executive Director and Joyce Foundation-funded partners will work to establish a data collection, management and analysis capacity to help meet Sweet Water project needs. Ideally, this capacity will begin in time to help with specific implementation projects outlined in the implementation plans for the Menomonee and Kinnickinnic River watersheds, which were finalized in November 2010. This added capacity will also assist Sweet Water with mapping needs associated with communicating the content of the implementation plans to key audiences. Intended Outcomes: GIS-based analysis and mapping needed to ensure progress on priority projects in this and the Menomonee River watershed implementation plan, and maps useful for communicating the priorities set forth in both watershed implementation plans to key audiences Sweet Water will rely on to assist with implementation. 2. Title: Work with MMSD, Milwaukee County, Milwaukee, Greenfield, Cudahy, St. Francis, West Allis and West Milwaukee to collect GIS-based stormwater catchment area maps and public/private outfalls and integrate data into SWWT GIS platform. Fall 2010-ongoing

Timeline:

Key partners: Municipalities, MMSD, SEWRPC, Milwaukee Riverkeeper, Sixteenth Street Community Health Center, American Rivers, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
12

Estimated Costs:

Costs included in project #1 above

Funding Sources: Costs included in project #1 above Project Category Addressed: Data Collection & Mapping Project Summary: A project within a project (part of project #1, with relevance to projects 5-9 below) to produce the information needed to better understand stormwater catchment areas in target assessment point areas within the Kinnickinnic and Menomonee River watersheds. Intended Outcomes: The information gathered as part of this effort will allow Sweet Water to target specific neighborhoodscale areas in which the clustering of green infrastructure and/or stormwater management best management practices will be most cost-effective. 3. Title: Timeline: Identify and integrate parcel, property owner and land use/occupancy data into SWWT GIS platform. Fall 2010-ongoing

Key partners: Municipalities, the Nonprofit Center of Milwaukee, MMSD, SEWRPC, Milwaukee Riverkeeper, Sixteenth Street Community Health Center, University of WisconsinMilwaukee. Estimated Costs: Costs included in project #1 above

Funding Sources: Costs included in project #1 above Project Category Addressed: Data Collection & Mapping Project Summary: A project within a project (part of project #1, with relevance to various projects below) to provide Sweet Water with access to information needed to target areas and specific properties within the Kinnickinnic and Menomonee River watersheds where best management practices could be implemented in the most cost-effective manner. Intended Outcomes: The information gathered as part of this effort will allow Sweet Water to target areas and specific properties within the Kinnickinnic and Menomonee River watersheds where best management practices could be implemented in the most cost-effective manner. 4. Title: Survey recreational use of high priority areas throughout the watershed to determine risk of human exposure.
13

Timeline:

April 2011-October 2011

Key partners: Sixteenth Street Community Health Center, American Rivers, University of WisconsinMilwaukee Estimated Costs: $3,000

Funding Sources: TBD Project Category Addressed: Data Collection & Mapping Project Summary: A 7-month project will develop and implement a survey methodology that will characterize the public use of surface waters and adjacent lands throughout the Kinnickinnic River Watershed. The survey is likely to include field monitoring and interviews with residents, property owners and public officials, and would be conducted by undergraduate or graduate level students from the University of Wisconsin Milwaukee. High priority areas are likely to include portions of the river corridor that travel through Milwaukee County Parks and those areas that are in close proximity to residential areas. Intended Outcomes: A report that details the public use of surface waters and adjacent lands that will assist Sweet Water in understanding the locations where the highest risk exists of human exposure to in-stream bacteria pollution. This information will inform and influence the areas to be prioritized for find and fix activities described in Project #5, below. 5. Title: Convene small technical group to develop a strategy that prioritizes find and fix activities based on results of recreational use surveys, data collection/mapping work and existing bacteria loading data. December 2010 December 2011

Timeline:

Key partners: Sweet Water Science Committee, Milwaukee Riverkeeper, Great Lakes Water Institute, municipalities, MMSD, SEWRPC, WDNR Estimated Costs: TBD

Funding Sources: Potential funding - Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, Municipalities, Fund for Lake Michigan, Wisconsin Coastal Management Program Project Category Addressed: Pollutant Loading Analysis & Mitigation Project Summary: This is an effort to build off of the human bacteria monitoring information generated by the work in recent years of Milwaukee Riverkeeper and the Great Lakes Water Institute and to move toward the elimination of the sources of hot spots identified through that work where illicit discharges of human sewage are known to be very serious. The next step is to convene, under the auspices of Sweet
14

Waters Science Committee, a group of partners with the necessary knowledge to help Sweet Water craft a strategy for prioritizing stream reaches and/or specific stormwater outfalls that can be the subject of a pilot clean-up effort. Intended Outcomes: Project activities will result in a strategy for prioritizing stream reaches and/or specific stormwater outfalls that can be the subject of a pilot clean-up effort to eliminate serious illicit discharges of human sewage. A pilot project may be targeted to the Menomonee and/or the Kinnickinnic River watershed , subject to the strategy discussions described here and the availability of funding and willing partners. 6. Title: Timeline: Determine priority stormwater catchment areas for clustered green infrastructure applications to manage stormwater quantity and quality. November 2010-May 2011

Key partners: Sweet Water, Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District, Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission, Municipalities, Transition Milwaukee Estimated Costs: TBD

Funding Sources: TBD Project Category Addressed: Stormwater Management & Green Infrastructure Project Summary: Based on sewershed and stormwater catchment area mapping and parcel data collected as part of Project #1-3, the project partners will develop and implement a methodology to determine priority locations for clustered green infrastructure applications to manage stormwater quantity and quality. Stormwater catchment areas will be delineated for the watershed or appropriate sub-watersheds, and catchment areas will be ranked based on a number of criteria including current land use and susceptibility to change, property ownership, property configuration, and proximity to other economic and water resource investments being made by the community. High priority opportunities in the Kinnickinnic River Watershed may include the following: KK-1: Commercial properties at 60th and Oklahoma, City of Milwaukees Smart Street plan for Oklahoma and Maple Leaf Circle housing development KK-3: Alverno College, City of Milwaukee DPW facilities and rail yard KK-6: S. 27th Street Corridor (commercial big box), Greenfield Public Schools and Barnard Park, Interstate 43/894 Corridor KK-8: Westgate Shopping Center, 27th Street corridor, St. Lukes Hospital and Interstate KK-10: Chase/Howell Ave. commercial corridor, S. 5th Street/Place industrial properties and Interstate corridor Watershed-wide: Appropriate residential areas (i.e. basins), public and private school facilities and other institutional facilities throughout watershed Intended Outcomes: The project will result in a strategic and value-added approach to determining where investments in stormwater management should be made throughout the Kinnickinnic River Watershed. The priorities
15

that emerge from this project will influence how Sweet Water and other entities direct investments in on-the-ground stormwater management projects throughout the watershed. 7. Title: Timeline: Work with Milwaukee County to define and implement projects that help meet County-wide NR 216 stormwater management requirements. November 2010-December 2013

Key partners: Milwaukee County, Sweet Water, Municipalities Estimated Costs: TBD

Funding Sources: Potential funding - Milwaukee County, Others Project Category Addressed: Stormwater Management & Green Infrastructure Project Summary: Milwaukee County is working to determine where stormwater management investments should be made to most cost-effectively meet NR 216 stormwater management requirements. Sweet Water will work with Milwaukee County to foster collaborative approaches to stormwater management and will explore funding opportunities that will advance cost-effective on-the-ground stormwater management projects in the Kinnickinnic & Menomonee River Watersheds. Intended Outcomes: Improvements in the impact that Milwaukee County facilities and operations have on water quality throughout Milwaukee County through the reduction of flow, total suspended solids and other pollutant constituents, and the ability of Milwaukee County to meet NR 216 requirements. 8. Title: Timeline: Implementation of Clustered Residential Best Management Practices in the Kinnickinnic & Menomonee River Watersheds July 2010-May 2012

Key partners: Sixteenth Street Community Health Center, Milwaukee Riverkeeper, Groundwork Milwaukee, and Sweet Water Estimated Costs: $370,000

Funding Sources: Current funding - $32,000 Wisconsin Coastal Management Program, $63,175 Sweet Water Potential Funding - TBD Project Category Addressed: Stormwater Management & Green Infrastructure Project Summary: A three-year project includes a scalable approach to clustering stormwater best management practices (BMPs) and green infrastructure applications on residential properties in targeted areas of the
16

Kinnickinnic and Menomonee River Watersheds in Southeastern Wisconsin. Residential land use comprises 34% and 30% of these two watersheds, respectively, and scalable approaches to address nonpoint source load reductions are necessary to achieve fishable and swimmable waters. The initial phase will focus on a key stretch of the Kinnickinnic River between S. 6th and S. 16th Streets. Additional phases will expand and apply the project approach to 2 additional sites in the Kinnickinnic river Watershed and three sites in the Menomonee River Watershed. Intended Outcomes: Project activities will result in quantified reductions in nonpoint source pollution loading (Total Suspended Solids, Biological Oxygen Demand and Phosphorus), a ground-tested project approach that will be suitable for widespread replication and transference throughout the Milwaukee River Basin, and will contribute to delisting of beneficial use impairments in the Milwaukee Estuary Area of Concern. Examples of information that will be conveyed in this section include the number of BMPs installed, the number of residences affected, the amount of impervious surface removed, the length of riparian buffers installed, municipalities affected, etc. 9. Title: Timeline: Low Impact Development and Best Management Practices Clustering in the Wilson Park Creek/Holmes Ave. Creek Subwatersheds of the Kinnickinnic River March 2010-August 2012

Key partners: American Rivers, Milwaukee Municipal Sewerage District, Sweet Water, Milwaukee Department of Public Works, and the Gateway Business Improvement District Estimated Costs: $2,500,000

Funding Sources: Current funding - $214,000 Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District, $210,000 Private property owners Project Category Addressed: Stormwater Management & Green Infrastructure Project Summary: This project focuses on outreach, education and Low Impact Development demonstration sites in the Wilson Park Creek and Holmes Avenue Creek subwatersheds. The long term goal of the project includes increasing citizen and business participation in stormwater projects and improving and preserving the water quality and habitats of Milwaukees rivers. The short term goal of the project is to demonstrate the benefits of green Infrastructure and Low Impact Development best management practices to improve water quality and reduce the volume, rate and temperature of stormwater runoff. Intended Outcomes: Project activities will result in 124,600 square feet of green roofs; 50,300 square feet of permeable pavement; 51,400 square feet of bioswales and rain gardens; and the installation of 55 rain barrels. 10. Title: Timeline: Convene multi-jurisdictional task force to compile local best practices for salt application. January 2011 June 2011
17

Key Partners: Sweet Water Watershed Action Teams, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Municipalities, Wisconsin Department of Transportation Estimated Costs: TBD

Funding Sources: TBD Project Category Addressed: Reduced Chlorides Project Summary: Project Partners will work with municipalities, the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (DOT) and private property owners to compile local best practices regarding salt application and identify opportunities for salt use reduction. The results of the this effort will be presented at a discussion forum that involves all jurisdictions and facilitated to review reduction opportunities, identify municipal and state impediments to salt use reduction and create a plan that reduces salt use to the greatest extent possible through coordination of efforts and improved best management practices utilization. The forum will also identify additional training needs. Intended Outcomes: Project activities will result in reduced salt application through enhanced communication among municipalities, DOT and private property owners; improved communication between the groups regarding stormwater pollution abatement practices; greater awareness of the municipalities and DOT of each others practices as well as research on and successful applications of new best management practices; and advancement of the delisting of Beneficial Use Impairments in the Milwaukee Estuary Area of Concern. 11. Title: Timeline: Prioritizing and Implementing Riparian Buffer and Channel Enhancement Opportunities throughout the Kinnickinnic River March 2011-December 2012

Key partners: Milwaukee County Parks, City of Milwaukee, Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District, Army Corps of Engineers, Sweet Water, Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission, American Rivers Estimated Costs: TBD

Funding Sources: TBD Project Category Addressed: Riparian Buffer Restoration/Channel Enhancements Project Summary: This project will protect the watershed from nonpoint source pollution and provide bank stabilization, wildlife habitat and riparian buffer enhancements at key locations along the Kinnickinnic River Mainstem and its tributaries. The project will develop a planning document that integrates flood management activities being led by MMSD with streambank stabilization and rehabilitation
18

opportunities within the watershed, and will provide a method for project prioritization. High priority areas are likely to include the riparian corridors travelling through Lyons Park and Jackson Park, and portions of Villa Mann Creek and Wilson Park Creek. Intended Outcomes: Project activities will result in a prioritized listing of riparian channel and habitat enhancement projects that will provide Sweet Water with a roadmap for directing investments in these activities over the next several years. 12. Title: Timeline: Increase access in conjunction with City of Milwaukee Kinnickinnic River Trail Project, Washington St - 6th St January 2011-December 2012

Key partners: City of Milwaukee, Groundwork Milwaukee, Sixteenth Street Community Health Center Estimated Costs: $60,000

Funding Sources: Potential funding - Wisconsin Department of Transportation, Wisconsin Coastal Management Program, City of Milwaukee Project Category Addressed: Recreational Access Improvements Project Summary: The project will construct a series of trailhead amenities, stream bank restoration and walking trails connecting the City of Milwaukees 2.5-mile paved Kinnickinnic River Trail (KKRT) with the Kinnickinnic River. Project objectives extend beyond providing public access, to also include aquatic and terrestrial habitat improvements. The project will include educational and way-finding signage, public art installations, native landscaping and additional amenities, which will provide a platform for education and recreational programming. The trail and its associated amenities will also increase safety and improve public health and general quality of life for the areas adjacent to the trail and to the bicyclists who use it as a transportation route. Intended Outcomes: Outcomes include enhanced physical connections to the Kinnickinnic River, improved pedestrian and bicycle connections, community gathering places, water quality and storm water management features, in-stream and riparian habitat for fish, birds, insects, and other wildlife, and new economic opportunities for local businesses and entrepreneurs. 13. Title: Education and Outreach: Evaluate the results of Sweet Water Household Survey (fall 2010) and develop public education programming that responds to the identified needs. November 2010 May 2012

Timeline:

Key partners: Sweet Water, 1000 Friends of Wisconsin, Root-Pike Watershed Initiative Network, UWExtension
19

Estimated Costs:

$66,240

Funding Sources: Current funding - $34,240 from Sweet Water and in-kind from UW-Milwaukee. Potential funding - Wisconsin Coastal Management Program, Municipalities Project Category Addressed: Education Project Summary: With the findings of the public survey of knowledge, behaviors, and attitudes regarding water resources and stormwater as a foundation, the partners propose to develop over an 18 month period a mass media campaign to reduce pollution from urban stormwater and nonpoint sources in the Lake Michigan watersheds of southeast Wisconsin. With over 60% of the pollutants now coming from stormwater, there is no simple end-of-pipe solution. The solution necessitates the engagement of the citizens throughout communities who assume the responsibility for stormwater generated on their own property and act to reduce its impact. The survey will identify gaps in the general understanding of nonpoint pollution and will enable outreach efforts to be crafted in such a way as to improve the understanding of individuals regarding the impacts of their actions and behaviors on the health of our waters. It will also develop a local waters literacy that not only addresses the challenge of improving water quality and resource protection, but will also strive to foster a greater sense of identity and civic pride associated to the improvement of water quality and protection of water resources. The Greater Milwaukee Watersheds have the potential to be recognized as a regional model for innovative, science-based approaches to nonpoint pollution that are embraced and championed by diverse neighborhoods and communities for whom healthy waterways and water resources are central for their quality of life. Intended Outcomes: With focused educational and outreach efforts targeted to behaviors and issues prioritized in both the implementation plan for the restoration of the Kinnickinnic River and the findings of the survey, the partners will be able to craft messages and delivery methodologies to specific audiences for the desired behaviors. Targeted messages and communication of clear, stewardship actions can lead residents to specific changes in behaviors that will lead to improved health of our waters. The campaign will help to communicate that while the effects of individual actions may be incremental; when added together with the efforts of other individuals, the individual actions are accumulative and lead to large impacts. An additional outcome will include a strengthened identity and practice of water stewardship in communities throughout our region. 14. Title: Timeline: Research an appropriate strategy for the use of alternative indicators to help identify and eliminate human sources of bacteria to the rivers, lake, and beaches. January 2011December 2012

Key partners: Sweet Water Science Committee, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Great Lakes WATER Institute, Milwaukee Riverkeeper, Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission, Racine Health Department. Estimated TBD
20

Costs: Funding Sources: TBD Project Category Addressed: Science/Research Project Summary: A group of experts will be convened to determine what strategy will work best to continue monitoring regulatory human health indicators while expanding efforts to utilize alternative indicators better suited to targeting human pathogens with the greatest likelihood of making people sick should they come into contact with them in the water. Intended Outcomes: Detailed recommendations on how best to continue monitoring regulatory human health indicators while expanding efforts to utilize alternative indicators better suited to targeting human pathogens. 15. Title: Collect and analyze in-stream bacteroides data across the hydrograph, in order to better measure progress of reducing and eliminating human sources of bacteria in the future. 20112012

Timeline:

Key partners: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Great Lakes WATER Institute, Sweet Water Science Committee, Milwaukee Riverkeeper, Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission Estimated Costs: TBD

Funding Sources: TBD Project Category Addressed: Science / Research Project Summary: Researchers would be better able to point to useful methods for measuring progress in reducing and eliminating human sources of bacteria if they were armed with information gathered in the field on how human bacteroides levels in the rivers vary over the course of the hydrographic fluctuations typically seen with precipitation events. Intended Outcomes: Analysis of data collected in the Menomonee and Kinnickinnic Rivers on how human bacteroides levels in the rivers vary over the course of the hydrographic fluctuations typically seen with precipitation events. Based on that information, a recommended monitoring strategy will be developed for measuring progress in the reduction of human sources of bacteria in the rivers.

21

16. Title:

Pursue opportunities to further municipal progress toward meeting their NR 151/216 mandate to reduce total suspended solids (TSS) inputs to the Kinnickinnic River system via trading of TSS reduction credits between municipalities. January 2011December 2012

Timeline:

Key partners: Municipalities, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, and Sweet Water Policy Committee Estimated Costs: TBD

Funding Sources: TBD Project Category Addressed: Policy Project Summary: Sweet Water will explore the potential benefits, costs, and institutional framework requirements of possible trading of total suspended solids reduction credits between municipalities within the same watershed. Intended Outcomes: The goal of this project is an evaluation of the feasibility of this potential policy tool, which would support the maximum water quality improvement across jurisdictional boundaries in the most costeffective manner. 17. Title: Engage stakeholders through Sweet Waters Watershed Action Teams in the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage Districts processes to create Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) and implementation plans for bacteria, phosphorus, and sediment in the Kinnickinnic River Watershed, in hopes of enhancing efforts to further improve water quality through the TMDL effort in parallel with Watershed Restoration Plan implementation efforts. January 2011December 2012

Timeline:

Key partners: Sweet Water, Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District, Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Funding: TBD

Funding Sources: TBD Project Category Addressed: Policy Project Summary: MMSD will contract with consultants to perform the technical work associated with identification of TMDLs for each target pollutant, including the creation of an implementation plan for each pollutant.
22

Throughout these processes, there will likely be needs for technical input, outreach to stakeholders, education on what these efforts entail and what implications they might have for the implementation of the WRPs and the activities of Sweet Water. Intended Outcomes: TMDLs, TMDL implementation plans, and attendant implementation efforts that serve to improve water quality in Sweet Waters target watersheds, and clear roles for Sweet Water throughout the process that add value to the regional effort these projects will entail.

23

V. NEXT STEPS Adaptive Management as an Ongoing Approach The implementation plan we have outlined is based on an adaptive management approach. As a collaborative organization with many partners and uncertainty concerning future project implementation funds, Sweet Water will need to remain flexible in its ongoing planning efforts. Sweet Water will have to adjust project priorities from the opportunities described in this Implementation Plan as potential funding and other considerations unfold. Sweet Water will provide a coordinating role in future projects, especially those detailed in Section IV, while the leadership role on particular projects will be determined on a case-by-case basis as opportunities for funding support and partnerships become clear. Bi-Monthly Sweet Water Steering Council Updates/Review The Sweet Water Executive Director and leaders of the Watershed Action Teams (WATs), Policy, Science, and Communications Committees will provide the Steering Council with regular updates on their plans and implementation efforts at each bi-monthly Steering Council meeting, reporting on progress, challenges, and needed program adjustments. Quarterly Grant Review Meetings Sweet Waters Steering Council conducts quarterly Grant Review Board meetings, which include members of the Steering Council, the Executive Director and key representatives of the KK and Menomonee WATs. The purpose of these meetings is to evaluate recent progress towards generating deliverables identified in Sweet Water grant awards and to scan upcoming grant funding opportunities to determine if particular Sweet Water projects meet grantor criteria for support. These quarterly meetings provide a venue to review and address project priorities as characterized in this Implementation Plan and to adjust those priorities as necessary based in part on the prospects of securing grant support from a variety of public and private sources. Semi-Annual Meetings with Key Stakeholders To insure a higher level of interagency cooperation and collaboration, Sweet Water will organize semiannual project review meeting with its key regional water quality stakeholders. Those stakeholders include the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District, SEWRPC, the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, Milwaukee County (Parks and Transportation/Public Works), and major municipalities in the Sweet Water watersheds. Hosting regular meetings will help to reduce the number of missed opportunities for more effective cooperation on projects of mutual benefit. Annual Reevaluation of Priority Projects The various meetings mentioned above provide ample opportunity to revisit the Kinnickinnic River Watershed Priority Projects, detailed in Section IV of this document. The Sweet Water executive director and leaders of the WATs will evaluate the status of all priority projects. In addition, all Kinnickinnic River Watershed Projects (i.e. Section III) will be reviewed for their potential to be included as priority projects. The Priority Projects (i.e. Section IV) will be revised on an annual basis.

24

VI. APPENDIX 1. Kinnickinnic River Watershed Restoration Plan Executive Summary (contains map of subwatersheds referred to in this plan) 2. Map of Pollutant Hotspots by Sub-watershed in the Kinnickinnic River Watershed 3. Foundation Actions Table from the Kinnickinnic River Watershed Restoration Plan

25