Chapter 10-Value Based Management
Chapter 10-Value Based Management
Chapter 10-Value Based Management
The key point of VBM is that the focusing on shareholder value gives
clear discipline. The goal is to analyze every strategic decision in terms
of its impact in shareholder’s wealth and also to focus upon
shareholder value to evaluate acquisitions, divestments, capital
investment projects and assess alt strategies.
VBM helps manage companies better from a strategic and financial
perspective but implementation is a challenge.
The different approaches and implementation of VBM can be seen in
terms of companies that:-
2
- Claim to be value oriented companies but their actions do not
support the claims.
10 Step approach
The overall framework for VBM can be viewed in terms of the following steps:-
3
6. How does the vision translate into customer, shareholder and other relevant
perspectives for the org?
7. How does the vision look in terms of the divisions/ business units?
8. What is the divisional value?
9. What are the key divisional value drivers?
10. What do these divisional value drivers look like in terms if the micro drivers and
KPIs?
The 10 steps above capture the sequence of events to be followed. The first 5 challenge
the current vision, value and potential for improvement for the whole business. In terms
of implementation, Balance Scorecard and Business Excellence Model are invaluable but
they need to be related to a vision that is clearly articulated and related specifically to
financial performance.
Successful implementation would require change to be driven down the business across
divisions. The advantage of using the 10 step approach is that it related specifically about
value and performance in financial terms at the overall business and business unit levels.
Refer to pp 303 to understand application- Asia Hotels Ltd case study given as example.
VBM should also be viewed from a strategic perspective. Therefore, scenario thinking is
particularly important. Issues to consider include:-
- What are the business’ prospects according to your scenario?
- What is driving the prospects?
- What are the values of these prospects?
- Do these prospects make sense?
- What should be the business response?
4
Scenario thinking
Scenarios start from the premise that there is more than one future and recognize that
there is more than one future and requires the consideration of major forces and trends
driving valuation, their relationships and critical uncertainties. Refer text pp 305 for Shell
e.g.
The value of performing scenario thinking is the insights discovered in the process of
investigating the nature and existence of the opportunities available to management.
Scenario thinking avoids the shortcomings of traditional approaches to analysis where
assumptions are based on the present situation with little attention to the external
environment.
Linking ST with free cash flow and strategic value calculations provides a distinctive way
of grasping key questions about the future of the business. In terms of CAP, it focuses
thought about when conditions signaling the end of CAP might occur i.e. a return greater
than the coc cannot be achieved.
Scenarios helps managers recognize the external environment of the business over which
it has no control but to which they might respond in a timely manner. It encourages
thinking through various diverse speculations and structuring them in pathways that are
relevant to the business.
ST helps managers to anticipate and adjust for the potential impact on the value drivers of
change in the environment; develop a comprehensive set of assumptions about what the
future might be and how it will affect industry profitability and the company’s
performance.
There should be at least 2 equally credible scenarios posed against each other. Working
out of different potential values for a business gives more flexibility, realistic relevance
and ‘navigational’ value to the analysis of strategic value. Sharp and sensitive mental
preparation by advance calculation of the value impact of alternative scenarios allows
faster responses to be made.
Working out the CAP and present value of different scenarios enables managers to make
2 important gains in their strategic thinking.
- Strategic value outputs from the inputs of their preferred plans depends on
assumptions which could be clarified and critically evaluated by comparisons
5
made with the assumptions of credible alternative scenarios. Managers have to
focus on the quality of the assumptions re ext environment before relying on the
figures generated by the Shareholder Value model.
- Considering present value and CAP implications should sharpen managers’ sense
of range of options they could have in driving forward their business in a
particular direction.
- Each scenario helps clarify the dominant strategic challenges associated with it
and the similarities and differences between the required responses.
Phase 1
This will take a minimum of 6 months involving:
- Presentation to senior corporate and divisional management of the concepts and
their benefits
- Discussing key concerns and issues
- Obtaining commitment of the MD and other key management
Phase 2
This will require considerable time and effort which depends on the size of the org but on
average 6 months is manageable. Involves:
- Formulation of a ‘task force’ drawn from senior central management and
divisions.
6
- Identification of specific obstacles and issues e.g. relating the approach to
corporate financial management and reporting culture.
- Determination of app divisional coc, TV frameworks and planning periods
- Development of app applications at corporate and divisional level
- Development of application guidelines
- Identification of education requirements of employees who will perform or need
to understand the approach.
- Development of educational programmes.
Phase 3
This is the longest and most critical part of the implementation process. 9 months is
rough guideline. It involves the development of a framework that makes explicit
recognition of the need to ensure a strong customer focus. Aspirations of a strong
customer focus can be thwarted w/o the recognitions that it may have broader
organizational ramifications. Customer orientation can be attempted using either balanced
scorecard or business excellence model. Other initiatives include:
- Incorporation of the approach into performance measurement via financial and
non financial performance measures
- Delivery of education programmes and how it links to current practice
- Use of the approach for evaluating capital expenditure plans etc
- Provision of expert assistance when needed.
Phase 4
Involves:
- refinement of the approach and performance measurement
- linking of the approach to incentive compensation schemes
- development of the approach for investor communication
7
Balanced Scorecard (BS)
The needs of both customers and shareholders need to be satisfied at the same time.
Businesses need to be able to respond to customer requirements with their internal
delivery mechanisms and to update and change them as necessary. To be successful,
companies need a broad set of performance indicators that are appropriate and relevant
rather than just financial indicators therefore the use of the BS.
This approach includes some financial measures complemented by operational measures
e.g. customer satisfaction, internal process measurement and the org innovations and
improvement to activities. These require operational measures of strategy and represent
the drivers for future financial performance.
8
- Can we continue to improve and create value? (innovation and learning
perspective)- focuses on change. It has to be recognized that targets have to keep
changing and need to be redefined. This perspective focuses on challenges and
measures them in terms of innovation, improvements and learning.
- How do we look at our shareholders? (financial perspective)- relates to
shareholders. KPI include profitability, liquidity and value creation.
The BS is invaluable for linking the vision with the managerial action needed to bring
about improvement. The BS offers the potential to align the business goals throughout the
whole org. The mechanism to make this possible are the org’s key management processes
e.g. business planning, budgeting, performance reporting and incentivisation.
When used in this way, the BS becomes part of a businesses VBM system for
understanding the dynamics of value creation.
9
In the fig above, there are 4 key processes to a typical VBM which are part of a self
reinforcing circle:
1. Strategy Development: concerned with articulating the org’s vision and
expressing it in terms of specific strategic goals needed to be achieved from the
s/holder, customer, employee and innovation perspective. The BS can be used to
translate the vision into tangible goals.
2. Business planning is about how the strategy should be specifically carried out
.e.g. activities, actions and programs to be undertaken to achieve the strategic
goals.
4. The incentivisation and reward stage concerns rewarding people for the
attainment of the strategic goals- the BS is a mechanism for communicating how
successful (or not ) the org was and capturing the key lesson that the business has
learned or should learn to achieve its vision.
10
The implementation has been shown to have 2 benefits:
- it brings together in a single management report the company’s competitive
agenda
- helps prevent decisions that are not in the interest of the whole org even though
they might benefit one aspect of the business. the BS helps managers see whether
improvements in one area may be achieved only at the expense of another area.
Many orgs that have adopted the principles of value focus on the BEM.
A standard European model has been developed to measure an org’s ‘level’ of excellence.
The BEM is based on the principle that in order to succeed there are a number of key
enablers that an org/team should concentrate its efforts and it should measure its success
through a no of key results areas. The key enablers are:
- How well the org is led
- How well its people are managed
- How far its policies and strategy are developed and implemented by
leaders and people
- How well it manages its resources and develops and manages its processes
11
The key result areas are:
- How far it satisfies its customers
- How well motivated and committed its workforce is
- How the local and national community outside the org view its activities –
contribution to society
- key business results- profits, ROCE, SE and achieving targets.
Below is recent research into the factors for successful implementation, their implication
and observations.
12
Key implementation issues
Timescale/Speed: Takes longer than anticipated. There has to be preparedness and
planning to overcome resistance to the changed requirements. Speed in being able to
create value is seen as crucial. Management processes will need to be improved and
external consultants can be used to speed up change.
The role of the champion: Success requires a champion who wants s/holder value to
be the way the company is measured and wants to take the lead. There is a considerable
resource requirement to provide an effective leader who may be tied up with
implementation for years. Management must plan for the resource and ensure continuity
and succession in the key role.
Level of cascading throughout the company: When the concept has been “bough into”
by senior management, next is cascading the concept in value development of value
creating strategies/processes undertaken with the business heads. The primary objective
of VB system is to link the firm’s strategies and management performance evaluation to
the creation of s/holder value. Those cascading the information have to portray the
concepts in practical ways rather than complicated theories. Implementation process at
corporate level will differ from implementation in lower levels. Most orgs used the
approach at corporate level, where the need to understand which parts of the business
deliver value and which use excessive capital without much returns is vital.
Cost of capital: Estimating and understanding the coc is a fundamental issue in s/holder
value. it is difficult to estimate the coc for each business unit. Often, the total company
13
coc is used and applied to each of the business units- this is inaccurate. The coc should be
understood below management level via commutation and education. W/o adequate
assessment of coc, it is not possible to determine how much or whether value has been
created or destroyed.
The ongoing nature approach: Most companies’ intention is that it will be managed and
governed to maximise value for its s/holders and stakeholders for the long term. The
objective is that the ROI exceeds the COC. Implementation does not have a finite end- its
ongoing via continual feedback, review and drive/momentum of top management to
sustain the approach.
In order to achieve value creation, it is a vital requirement that the company direct the
value creation process. It requires accepting long term responsibility for maintaining and
retaining the processes necessary to ensure that ROI exceeds COC and provides the
direction for it. The direction process has to be ongoing and will influence the whole org
and all functions of the company. Below is a list of the skills suggested for value
direction- (for full list refer text pp321)
o development of applied corporate finance
o value metrics
o strategic planning
o internal audit
o education and training
o value performance management
o IT
14
value direction means ensuring that the necessary links are in place between building
budgets and targets in physical value terms and enabling their transfer to financial
data at higher levels so that everyone can get on with managing the business in
meaningful terms for creating value.
DON’T’S:
o Avoid degeneration into a number crunching exercise
15
o Avoid manipulating TV figures of business strategies which need to be
tested against ext assumptions
o Do not apply VBM exclusively to just one area of management process
o Avoid being “bull headed”- compromise to make headway- e.g. defer
reward system changes
KEY BENEFITS:
o Development of a common framework for integrating long range strategic
plans, acquisitions, short term budgets and capital programmes etc
o Reward systems that align behavior and motivation
o Realisation that a trade off exists between large investment and revenue
projects
o Performance measurement has a more outward focus relative to
competitors and market conditions.
For successful businesses embarking on shareholder value initiative, there are 3 crucial
issues to address:
16
integration strategies, deploying cutting edge technology and working to upgrade quality
of people and processes.
Finance function has to manage value created from:
- an internal perspective- managing for value
- an external perspective- M&A
17