0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views3 pages

QT 2 Final

Participants in this experiment consisted of 67 California State University, Northridge students. In a double-blind procedure, participants were randomly assigned to follow directions from either a casually or professionally dressed experimenter. The authors predicted that participants in the professionally dressed condition would follow directions more accurately, but results indicated that participants who received directions from a casual experimenter were more compliant. It may be that students follow directions more accurately when those directions are given by someone who is dressed more similar to themselves. The document also discusses how dress has been shown to influence hiring decisions during job interviews.

Uploaded by

nawabrp
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views3 pages

QT 2 Final

Participants in this experiment consisted of 67 California State University, Northridge students. In a double-blind procedure, participants were randomly assigned to follow directions from either a casually or professionally dressed experimenter. The authors predicted that participants in the professionally dressed condition would follow directions more accurately, but results indicated that participants who received directions from a casual experimenter were more compliant. It may be that students follow directions more accurately when those directions are given by someone who is dressed more similar to themselves. The document also discusses how dress has been shown to influence hiring decisions during job interviews.

Uploaded by

nawabrp
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

ASSlCMLn1 nC1

CuAn1A1lvL 1LCPnlCuLS2
Cn
LCLL L8CL1lCn Cn


Su8Ml11Lu 1C Su8Ml11Lu 8?
LLC1 A8PlSPLk uu11A SPASPl 8PuSPAn
8LC nC10907626
SLC 19090A22






CCn1Ln1
1lnLroducLlon
2Cb[ecLlve
3LlLeraLure revlew
4Concluslon
38eference



















AbsLracL
arLlclpanLs ln Lhls experlmenL conslsLed of 67 Callfornla SLaLe unlverslLy
norLhrldge sLudenLs ln Lhls doublebllnd procedure parLlclpanLs were randomly
asslgned Lo follow dlrecLlons from elLher a casually or professlonallydressed
experlmenLer 1he auLhors predlcLed LhaL parLlclpanLs ln Lhe professlonally
dressed condlLlon would follow dlrecLlons more accuraLely buL resulLs lndlcaLed
LhaL parLlclpanLs who recelved dlrecLlons from a casual experlmenLer were more
compllanL lL may be LhaL sLudenLs follow dlrecLlons more accuraLely when Lhose
dlrecLlons are glven by someone who ls dressed more slmllar Lo Lhemselves And
from Lhe 8rlLlsh [ournal on dressed up of men's
lnLroducLlon
A buslness llke appearance ls ofLen LhoughL Lo be a prerequlslLe Lo success ln
many socleLles especlally for Lhose people who work ln professlonal careers
(pelucheLLe karl 2006) Lmployees may belleve LhaL dresslng professlonally
lndlcaLes Lo coworkers LhaL Lhey are moLlvaLed skllled hardworklng and serlous
abouL Lhelr workplace responslblllLles (pelucheLLe karl 2006) uress has also
been shown Lo lnfluence hlrlng declslons durlng [ob lnLervlews (forsyLh drake
cox 1983) !usL as many buslnesses prefer professlonally dressed employees
many

You might also like